Effects of Different Nitrogen Application Regimes on Translocation of Rice Photosynthetic Products and Nitrogen Under Alternate Wetting and Drying Irrigation

doi:10.16819/j.1001-7216.2022.210507

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】Field plot experiments were conducted to study the effects of different irrigation and nitrogen application regimes on yield, photosynthetic physiological characteristics, non-structural carbohydrate and nitrogen use efficiency of rice, so as to lay a theoretical basis for scientific and reasonable irrigation and nitrogen management in local paddy fields. 【Method】With Zhongzheyou 1 as material, a field experiment was carried out under two irrigation regimes of flooding irrigation (FI) and alternate wetting and drying (AWD), as well as five nitrogen application regimes of zero nitrogen (N₀), conventional nitrogen application (PUN₁₀₀), 20% nitrogen reduction (PUN₈₀), 20% nitrogen reduction of slow-release compound fertilizer with biochar (CRFN₈₀-BC) and 20% nitrogen reduction of stable compound fertilizer with biochar (SFN₈₀-BC). 【Result】Different irrigation and nitrogen application regimes significantly affected the grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency, and the two factors showed significant interaction. Compared with FI, CRFN₈₀-BC and SFN₈₀-BC treatments significantly increased the net photosynthetic rate and leaf area index of rice at full heading stage, leaf non-structural carbohydrate accumulation and its transfer to grains under AWD, and finally increased the number of effective panicles and grains per panicle of rice. Compared with PUN₁₀₀, the yield increased by 6.8% and 10.4%, and the average yield in two years was 9656.5 kg/hm² and 10033 kg/hm², respectively. AWD also increased the amount of N translocation and the contribution rate of N translocation of stem and leaves from heading to filling stages under CRFN₈₀-BC and SFN₈₀-BC treatments, and then significantly increased rice nitrogen use efficiencies. Compared with PUN₈₀, CRFN₈₀-BC and SFN₈₀-BC under AWD significantly increased N recovery efficiency, N agronomic efficiency and N partial productivity, by 37.8% and 58.4%, 56.6% and 71.1%, 15.2% and 19.3%, respectively. 【Conclusion】Under AWD regimes, 20% (144 kg/hm²) N reduction of the stable compound fertilizer or slow-release compound fertilizer combined with biochar treatment significantly promote the leaf photosynthetic rate, non-structural carbohydrate and nitrogen accumulation at the vegetative growth period of rice, as well as their transportation to panicles at the reproductive growth period, which jointly improve rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency. It can serve as the suitable water and nitrogen management regimes for the green and efficient rice cultivation at the local area.

Key words: alternate wetting and drying, slow-release compound fertilizer or stable compound fertilizer, photosynthesis, nitrogen translocation, yield

摘要：

【目的】采用大田小区试验，研究不同灌溉模式下氮肥施用模式对水稻产量、光合生理特性、非结构性碳水化合物和氮素利用效率的影响，以期为当地稻田灌溉和施氮模式优化管理提供理论依据。【方法】以中浙优1号为供试材料，设常规淹灌和干湿交替2种灌溉模式，以及不施氮(N₀)、常规施氮(PUN₁₀₀)、减氮20%(PUN₈₀)、缓控释复合肥减氮20%+生物炭(CRFN₈₀-BC)和稳定性复合肥减氮20%+生物炭(SFN₈₀-BC) 5种施氮模式。【结果】不同灌溉和施氮模式显著影响水稻产量和氮素利用率，且二者存在显著交互作用。与常规淹灌相比，干湿交替灌溉下CRFN₈₀-BC和SFN₈₀-BC处理显著提高了水稻齐穗期净光合速率，增加了叶面积，促进了叶片非结构性碳水化合物累积及其向籽粒的转移，进而提高了水稻有效穗数和每穗粒数，其2年平均产量分别为9656.5 kg/hm²和10033 kg/hm²，较PUN₁₀₀处理分别提高了6.8%和10.4%。同时，干湿交替灌溉提高了CRFN₈₀-BC和SFN₈₀-BC处理下齐穗至灌浆期水稻茎鞘和叶片氮转运量和氮转运贡献率，进而显著提高水稻氮利用效率。与PUN₈₀处理相比，干湿交替灌溉下CRFN₈₀-BC和SFN₈₀-BC处理氮肥回收效率、氮肥农学利用率、氮肥偏生产力分别显著提高37.8%和58.4%、56.6%和71.1%、15.2%和19.3%。【结论】干湿交替灌溉模式下稳定性复合肥或缓控释复合肥减氮20%(144 kg/hm²)配施生物炭处理显著提高了水稻营养生长期叶片光合速率，促进了非结构性碳水化合物和氮素累积和转运，二者协同提高水稻产量和氮利用效率，可作为适宜当地水稻绿色高效栽培的最佳水氮管理模式。

关键词: 干湿交替, 缓控释/稳定性复合肥, 光合作用, 氮转运, 产量

WU Longlong, YU Yijun, TIAN Cang, ZHANG Lu, HUANG Jing, ZHU Lianfeng, ZHU Chunquan, KONG Yali, ZHANG Junhua, CAO Xiaochuang, JIN Qianyu. Effects of Different Nitrogen Application Regimes on Translocation of Rice Photosynthetic Products and Nitrogen Under Alternate Wetting and Drying Irrigation[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2022, 36(3): 295-307.

吴龙龙, 虞轶俊, 田仓, 张露, 黄晶, 朱练峰, 朱春权, 孔亚丽, 张均华, 曹小闯, 金千瑜. 干湿交替灌溉下施氮模式对水稻光合产物和氮转运的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(3): 295-307.

Figures/Tables 9

References 60

[1]	Chen G, Chen Y, Zhao G H, Cheng W D, Guo S W, Zhang H L, Shi W M. Do high nitrogen use efficiency rice cultivars reduce nitrogen losses from paddy fields?[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems＆Environment, 2015, 209: 26-33.
[2]	Sun B, Zhang L, Yang L, Zhang F S, Norse D, Zhu Z L. Agricultural non-point source pollution in China: Causes and mitigation measures[J]. Ambio, 2012, 41(4): 370-379.
[3]	Archer D W, Halvorson A D. Managing nitrogen fertilizer for economic returns and greenhouse gas reductions in irrigated cropping systems[J]. Better Crops with Plant Food, 2010, 94(2): 4-5.
[4]	张绍文, 何巧林, 王海月, 蒋明金, 李应洪, 严奉君, 杨志远, 孙永健, 郭翔, 马均. 控制灌溉条件下施氮量对杂交籼稻F优498氮素利用效率及产量的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(1): 82-94.
	Zhang S W, He Q L, Wang H Y, Jiang M J, Li Y H, Yan F J, Yang Z Y, Sun Y J, Guo X, Ma J. Effects of nitrogen application rates on nitrogen use efficiency and grain yield of indica hybrid rice F You 498 under controlled intermittent irrigation[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2018, 24(1): 82-94. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	姚锋先. 不同水氮管理对水稻生长和水氮效率影响的生理机制研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2011.
	Yao F X. Studies on physiological mechanism of rice growth and waterand nitrogen use efficiency under different water and nitrogen regimes[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2011. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	何海兵, 杨茹, 廖江, 武立权, 孔令聪, 黄义德. 水分和氮肥管理对灌溉水稻优质高产高效调控机制的研究进展[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(2): 305-318.
	He H B, Yang R, Liao J, Wu L Q, Kong L C, Huang Y D. Research advance of high-yielding and high efficiency in resource use and improving grain quality of rice plants under water and nitrogen managements in an irrigated region[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(2): 305-318. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	孙永健, 孙园园, 徐徽, 杨志远, 秦俭, 彭玉, 马均. 水氮管理模式与磷钾肥配施对杂交水稻冈优725养分吸收的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(7): 1335-1346.
	Sun Y J, Sun Y Y, Xu H, Yang Z Y, Qin J, Peng Y, Ma J. Effects of water-nitrogen management patterns and combined application of phosphorus and potassium fertilizers on nutrient absorption of hybrid rice Gangyou 725[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(7): 1335-1346. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	孙永健, 孙园园, 徐徽, 李玥, 严奉君, 蒋明金, 马均. 水氮管理模式对不同氮效率水稻氮素利用特性及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(9): 1639-1649.
	Sun Y J, Sun Y Y, Xu H, Li Y, Yan F J, Jiang J M, Ma J. Effects of water-nitrogen management patterns on nitrogen utilization[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2014, 40(9): 1639-1649. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	Liang X Q, Chen Y X, Li H, Tian G M, Zhang Z J, Ni W Z, He M M. Nitrogen interception in floodwater of rice field in Taihu region of China[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2007, 19: 1474-1481.
[10]	Geng J B, Ma Q, Chen J Q, Zhang M, Li C L, Yang Y C, Yang X Y, Zhang W T, Liu Z G. Effects of polymer coated urea and sulfur fertilization on yield, nitrogen use efficiency and leaf senescence of cotton[J]. Field Crops Research, 2016, 187: 87-95.
[11]	陈贵, 鲁晨妮, 石艳平, 倪雄伟, 程旺大, 张红梅, 王保君, 张丽萍, 孙达. 不同缓控释肥搭配脲铵对水稻产量、氮素利用效率和土壤养分的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(1): 122-130.
	Chen G, Lu C N, Shi Y P, Ni X W, Cheng W D, Zhang H M, Wang B J, Zhang L P, Sun D. Effect of different controlled-release fertilizers with urea ammonium on yield, nitrogen use efficiency and soil nutrients of rice[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(1): 122-130. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	陈萍, 王素梅, 张萍, 李丽, 伍德春, 杨义雄. 不同配比控释肥对水稻植株生长及产量的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2019, 58(15): 22-25.
	Chen P, Wang S M, Zhang P, Li L, Wu D C, Yang Y X. Effects of different ratio of controlled release fertilizers on growth and yield of rice plants[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 58(15): 22-25. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	马泉, 王亚华, 王梦尧, 李春燕, 丁锦峰, 朱敏, 郭文善, 朱新开. 缓控释肥的发展应用与评价体系研究进展[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2020, 48(18): 24-29.
	Ma Q, Wang Y H, Wang M Y, Li C Y, Ding J F, Zhu M, Guo W S, Zhu X K. Research progress on development, application and evaluation system of slow and controlled release fertilizer[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 48(18): 24-29. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	古慧娟, 石元亮, 于阁杰, 王晶. 我国缓/控释肥料的应用效应研究进展[J]. 土壤通报, 2011, 42(1): 220-224.
	Gu H J, Shi Y L, Yu G J, Wang J. Research advances on the use efficiency of slow/controlled release fertilizer[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2011, 42(1): 220-224. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	Linquist B A, Liu L J, Kessel C V, Groenigen K J V. Enhanced efficiency nitrogen fertilizers for rice systems: Meta-analysis of yield and nitrogen uptake[J]. Field Crops Research, 2013, 154: 246-254.
[16]	王欣, 尹带霞, 张凤, 谭长银, 彭渤. 生物炭对土壤肥力与环境质量的影响机制与风险解析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(4): 248-257.
	Wang X, Yin D X, Zhang F, Tan C Y, Peng B. Analysis of effect mechanism and risk of biochar on soil fertility and environmental quality[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31(4): 248-257. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	Spokas K A, Novak J M, Venterea R T. Biochar′s role as an alternative N-fertilizer: Ammonia capture[J]. Plant and Soil, 2012, 350(1): 35-42.
[18]	彭玉, 孙永健, 蒋明金, 徐徽, 秦俭, 杨志远, 马均. 不同水分条件下缓/控释氮肥对水稻干物质量和氮素吸收、运转及分配的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(5): 859-870.
	Peng Y, Sun Y J, Jiang M J, Xu H, Qin J, Yang Z Y, Ma J. Effects of water management and slow/controlled release nitrogen fertilizer on biomass and nitrogen accumulation, translocation, and distribution in rice[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2014, 40(5): 859-870. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	李芳, 徐丽娇, 谢伟, 郝志鹏, 陈保冬. 菌根化育苗对玉米生长和养分吸收的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(1): 42-50.
	Li F, Xu L J, Xie W, Hao Z P, Chen B D. Effects of seedling mycorrhization on the growth and nutrient uptake of maize[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020, 26(1): 42-50. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000: 134-137.
	Li H S. Principle and Technology of Plant Physiological and Biochemical Experiment[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000: 134-137. (in Chinese)
[21]	Yoshida S, Forno D A, Cook J H, Gomez K A. Laboratory Manual for Physiological Studies of Rice[M]. Philippines: International Rice Research Institute Press, 1976: 46-49.
[22]	鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000: 308-312.
	Lu R K. Soil Agricultural Chemical Analysis Method[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2000: 308-312. (in Chinese)
[23]	Zhang H, Chen T T, Liu L J, Wang Z Q, Yang J C, Zhang J H. Performance in grain yield and physiological traits of rice in the Yangtze river basin of China during the last 60 years[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2013, 12(1): 57-66.
[24]	刘立军, 王康君, 卞金龙, 熊溢伟, 王志琴, 杨建昌. 结实期干湿交替灌溉对籽粒蛋白质含量不同的转基因水稻的生理特性及产量的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2014, 28(4): 384-390.
	Liu L J, Wang K J, Bian J L, Xiong Y W, Wang Z Q, Yang J C. Effect of alternate wetting and soil drying irrigation during grain filling on the physiological traits and yield of transgenic rice with different protein content in grains[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2014, 28(4): 384-390. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	姚林, 郑华斌, 刘建霞, 贺慧, 黄璜. 中国水稻节水灌溉技术的现状及发展趋势[J]. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33(5): 1381-1387.
	Yao L, Zheng H B, Liu J X, He H, Huang H. Current situation and prospect of rice water-saving irrigation technology in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2014, 33(5): 1381-1387. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	Liu L J, Chen T T, Wang Z Q, Zhang H, Yang J C, Zhang J H. Combination of site-specific nitrogen management and alternate wetting and drying irrigation increases grain yield and nitrogen and water use efficiency in super rice[J]. Field Crops Research, 2013, 154: 226-235.
[27]	邵玺文, 刘红丹, 杜震宇, 杨晶, 孟繁霞, 马景勇. 不同时期水分处理对水稻生长及产量的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2007, 21(1): 193-196.
	Shao X W, Liu H D, Du Z Y, Yang J, Meng F X, Ma J Y. Effects of water disposal on growth and yield of rice[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2007, 21(1): 193-196. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	王绍华, 曹卫星, 丁艳锋, 田永超, 姜东. 水氮互作对水稻氮吸收与利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2004, 37(4): 497-501.
	Wang S H, Cao W X, Ding Y F, Tian Y C, Jiang D. Interactions of water management and nitrogen fertilizer on nitrogen absorption and utilization in rice[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2004, 37(4): 497-501. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	徐国伟, 王贺正, 翟志华, 孙梦, 李友军. 不同水氮耦合对水稻根系形态生理、产量与氮素利用的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(10): 132-141.
	Xu G W, Wang H Z, Zhai Z H, Sun M, Li Y J. Effect of water and nitrogen coupling on root morphology and physiology, yield and nutrition utilization for rice[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31(10): 132-141. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	程建平, 曹凑贵, 蔡明历, 原保忠, 王建漳, 郑传举. 不同灌溉方式对水稻产量和水分生产率的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2006(12): 28-33.
	Cheng J P, Cao C G, Cai M L, Yuan B Z, Wang J Z, Zheng C J. Effects of different irrigation modes on the yield and water productivity of rice[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2006 (12): 28-33. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]	Vitousek P M, Mooney H A, Lubchenco J, Melillo J M. Human domination of earth’s ecosystems[J]. Science, 1997, 277(5325): 494-499.
[32]	Lu J, Ookawa T, Hirasawa T. The effects of irrigation regimes on the water use, dry matter production and physiological responses of paddy rice[J]. Plant and Soil, 2000, 223(1-2): 209-218.
[33]	Hauck R D. Nitrogen fertilizer effects on nitrogen cycle processes[J]. Ecological Bulletins, 1981, 33: 551-562.
[34]	胡梦芸, 门福圆, 张颖君, 孙丽静, 刘茜, 李倩影, 刘富爽, 李辉. 水氮互作对作物生理特性和氮素利用影响的研究进展[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2016, 36(3): 332-340.
	Hu M Y, Men F Y, Zhang Y J, Sun L J, Liu Q, Li Q Y, Liu F S, Li H. Researche progress on water-nitrogen interaction and its effects on crop growth and utilization of nitrogen[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2016, 36(3): 332-340. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[35]	阳彬, 郭碧芝, 郭荣发. 水肥耦合调控对水稻光合特性的影响[J]. 热带作物学报, 2018, 39(7): 1311-1317.
	Yang B, Guo B Z, Guo R F. Effect of water and fertilizer coupling on photosynthetic characteristic in rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2018, 39(7): 1311-1317. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[36]	郝树荣, 郭相平, 王文娟. 旱后复水对水稻生长的后效影响[J]. 农业机械学报, 2010, 41(7): 76-79.
	Hao S R, Guo X P, Wang W J. After effects of rewatering after water stress on the rice growth[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2010, 41(7): 76-79. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[37]	Ashraf M, Harris P J C. Photosynthesis under stressful nvironments: An overview[J]. Photosynthetica, 2013, 51(2): 163-190.
[38]	丁雷, 李英瑞, 李勇, 沈其荣, 郭世伟. 梯度干旱胁迫对水稻叶片光合和水分状况的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2014, 28(1): 65-70.
	Ding L, Li Y R, Li Y, Shen Q R, Guo S W. Effects of drought stress on photosynthesis and water status of rice leaves[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2014, 28(1): 65-70. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[39]	郝树荣, 郑姬, 冯远周, 黄聪波, 马丹萍. 水稻拔节期水氮互作的后效性影响研究[J]. 农业机械学报, 2013, 44(3): 92-96.
	Hao S R, Zheng J, Feng Y Z, Huang C B, Ma D P. Aftereffects of water-nitrogen interaction on rice at jointing stage[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2013, 44(3): 92-96. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[40]	卫丽, 马超, 黄晓书, 杜园园, 王同朝. 控释肥对夏玉米碳、氮代谢的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16(3): 773-776.
	Wei L, Ma C, Huang X S, Du Y Y, Wang T C. Effects of controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer on carbon and nitrogen metabolism of summer maize[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2010, 16(3): 773-776. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[41]	Yang J C, Zhang J H. Crop management techniques to enhance harvest index in rice[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2011, 61: 3177-3189.
[42]	Fu J, Huang Z H, Wang Z Q, Yang J C, Zhang J H. Pre-anthesis non-structural carbohydrate reserve in the stem enhances the sink strength of inferior spikelets during grain filling of rice[J]. Field Crops Research, 123(2): 170-182.
[43]	Pal R, Mahajan G, Sardana V, Chauhan B S. Impact of sowing date on yield, dry matter and nitrogen accumulation, and nitrogen translocation in dry-seeded rice in North-West India[J]. Field Crops Research, 2017, 206: 138-148.
[44]	Pan J F, Cui K H, Wei D, Huang J, Xiang J L, Nie L X. Relationships of non-structural carbohydrates accumulation and translocation with yield formation in rice recombinant inbred lines under two nitrogen levels[J]. Physiologia Plantarum, 2011, 141(4): 321-331.
[45]	Yang J C, Zhang J H, Wang Z Q, Zhu Q S. Activities of starch hydrolytic enzymes and sucrose-phosphate synthase in the stems of rice subjected to water stress during grain filling[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 52(364): 2169-2179.
[46]	Yang J C, Zhang J H, Wang Z Q, Zhu Q S, Wang W. Hormonal changes in the grains of rice subjected to water stress during grain filling[J]. Plant Physiology, 2001, 127(1): 315-323.
[47]	Gebbing T, Schnyder H. Pre-anthesis reserve utilization for protein and carbohydrate synthesis in grains of wheat[J]. Plant physiology, 1999, 121: 871-878.
[48]	陈婷婷, 许更文, 钱希旸, 王志琴, 张耗, 杨建昌. 花后轻干-湿交替灌溉提高水稻籽粒淀粉合成相关基因的表达[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(7): 1288-1299.
	Chen T T, Xu G W, Qian X Y, Wang Z Q, Zhang H, Yang J C. The effects of irrigation and nitrogen application on grain yield and quality of rice[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(7): 1288-1299. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[49]	王维, 蔡一霞, 蔡昆争, 张建华, 杨建昌, 朱庆森. 水分胁迫对贪青水稻籽粒充实及其淀粉合成关键酶活性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2006, 32(7): 972-979.
	Wang W, Cai Y X, Cai K Z, Zhang J H, Yang J C, Zhu Q S. Effect of controlled soil drying on grain filling and activities of key enzymes for starch synthesis in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2006, 32(7): 972-979. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[50]	彭辉辉, 刘强, 荣湘民, 彭建伟, 谢桂先, 张玉平, 陈煦, 石其伟. 不同栽培法对水稻谷草转氨酶与天冬氨酸激酶活性的影响[J]. 湖南农业大学学报: 自然科学版, 2005, 31(3): 233-237.
	Peng H H, Liu Q, Rong X M, Peng J W, Xie G X, Zhang Y P, Chen X, Shi Q W. Effects of different cultural methods on activities of GOT and AK of rice[J]. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University: Natural Sciences, 2005, 31(3): 233-237. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[51]	Huang Q Y, Fan X L, Tang S H, Zhang M, Huang X, Yi Q, Pang Y W, Huang J F. Seasonal differences in N release dynamic of controlled-released urea in paddy field and its impact on the growth of rice under double rice cropping system[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2019, 195: 104371.
[52]	Mi W H, Gao Q, Xia S Q, Zhao H T, Wu L H, Mao W, Hu Z P, Liu Y L. Medium-term effects of different types of N fertilizer on yield, apparent N recovery, and soil chemical properties of a double rice cropping system[J]. Field Crops Research, 2019, 234: 87-94.
[53]	Ye Y S, Liang X Q, Chen Y X, Liu J, Gu J T, Guo R, Li L. Alternate wetting and drying irrigation and controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer in late-season rice. Effects on dry matter accumulation, yield, water and nitrogen use[J]. Field Crops Research, 2013, 144: 212-224.
[54]	李学红, 李东坡, 武志杰, 崔磊, 肖富容, 李永华, 郑野, 张金明. 脲酶/硝化抑制剂在黑土和褐土中对尿素氮转化的调控效果[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(4): 1352-1360.
	Li X H, Li D P, Wu Z J, Cui L, Xiao F R, Li Y H, Zheng Y, Zhang J M. Effect of urease/nitrification inhibitor on urea nitrogen conversion in black soil and cinnamon soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(4): 1352-1360. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[55]	Deng F, Li W, Wang L, Hu H, Liao S, Pu S L, Tao Y F, Li G H, Ren W J. Effect of controlled-release fertilizers on leaf characteristics, grain yield, and nitrogen use efficiency of machine-transplanted rice in southwest China[J]. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2020.1807519
[56]	Wang L, Xue C, Pan X, Chen F, Liu Y. Application of controlled-release urea enhances grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency in irrigated rice in the Yangtze river Basin, China[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2018, 9: 999.
[57]	董桂春, 王余龙, 周娟, 张彪, 张传胜, 张岳芳, 杨连新, 黄建晔. 不同氮素籽粒生产效率类型籼稻品种氮素分配与运转的差异[J]. 作物学报, 2009, 35(1): 149-155.
	Dong G C, Wang Y L, Zhou J, Zhang B, Zhang C S, Zhang Y F, Yang L X, Huang J Y. Difference of nitrogen accumulation and translocation in conventional indica rice cultivars with different nitrogen use efficiency for grain output[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2009, 35(1): 149-155. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[58]	Huang M, Liu Y, Qin H D, Jiang L G, Zou Y B. Fertilizer nitrogen uptake by rice increased by biochar application[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2014, 50(6): 997-1000.
[59]	Wu F P, Jia Z K, Wang S G, Chang S X, Startsev A. Contrasting effects of wheat straw and its biochar on greenhouse gas emissions and enzyme activity in a Chernozemic soil[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2013, 49(5): 555-565.
[60]	Cui P Y, Fan F L, Yin C, Li Z J, Song A L, Wan Y F, Liang Y C. Urea-and nitrapyrin-affected N₂O emission is coupled mainly with ammonia oxidizing bacteria growth in microcosms of three typical Chinese arable soils[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2013, 66: 214-221.

年份 Year	处理 Treatment		有效穗数 Effective panicle number/(×10⁴·hm^-2)	千粒重 1000-grain weight /g	每穗粒数 Grain number per panicle	结实率 Seed setting rate /%	产量 Grain yield /(kg·hm^-2)
年份 Year	氮肥模式^aNitrogen^a	灌溉模式Irrigation	有效穗数 Effective panicle number/(×10⁴·hm^-2)	千粒重 1000-grain weight /g	每穗粒数 Grain number per panicle	结实率 Seed setting rate /%	产量 Grain yield /(kg·hm^-2)
2019	N₀	FI	230.0±3.5 f	24.4±0.1 ab	130.0±1.8 d	87.0±0.4 b	6554±151 h
	N₀	AWD	207.2±3.8 g	24.2±0.1 bc	147.6±1.3 c	91.6±0.4 a	7119±38 g
	PUN₁₀₀	FI	308.9±7.5 b	24.1±0.2 cd	146.6±1.6 c	78.9±0.7 d	8061±226 e
	PUN₁₀₀	AWD	312.6±3.8 ab	23.6±0.1 e	155.7±2.7 b	83.0±0.4 c	8927±188 c
	PUN₈₀	FI	259.9±3.8 e	24.3±0.2 abc	155.8±2.2 b	79.7±0.5 d	7684±75 g
	PUN₈₀	AWD	275.0±3.8 d	24.4±0.2 ab	163.5±2.5 a	82.8±0.3 c	8136±226 e
	CRFN₈₀-BC	FI	297.7±3.7 c	24.3±0.2 abc	157.2±1.2 b	76.0±0.6 e	8475±188 d
	CRFN₈₀-BC	AWD	320.2±3.8 a	23.9±0.1 d	163.3±1.8 a	82.4±0.8 c	9492±151 b
	SFN₈₀-BC	FI	312.6±3.8 ab	24.5±0.2 a	156.9±1.2 b	76.2±0.8 e	8739±75 cd
	SFN₈₀-BC	AWD	320.2±3.8 a	24.1±0.1 cd	165.0±2.0 a	82.4±0.7 c	9907±188 a
2020	N₀	FI	193.8±3.0 f	24.5±0.1 ab	125.2±1.0 e	84.9±0.2 b	5808±142 i
	N₀	AWD	175.8±2.3 g	24.2±0.1 bc	143.5±2.7 d	89.5±0.2 a	6239±88 h
	PUN₁₀₀	FI	314.8±7.7 b	24.1±0.1 cd	158.5±1.8 c	74.1±0.4 d	8289±92 f
	PUN₁₀₀	AWD	321.7±0.8 ab	23.7±0.1 e	167.6±3.9 b	78.0±0.2 c	9199±194 c
	PUN₈₀	FI	264.9±3.8 e	24.3±0.1 abc	169.2±0.9 b	74.8±0.2 d	7886±31 g
	PUN₈₀	AWD	280.2±3.8 d	24.4±0.1 ab	170.7±1.8 b	77.8±0.2 c	8523±134 ef
	CRFN₈₀-BC	FI	303.4±3.7 c	24.3±0.1 abc	171.6±0.8 b	71.4±0.3 e	8739±284 de
	CRFN₈₀-BC	AWD	326.3±3.8 a	23.9±0.1 d	178.2±1.1 a	77.4±0.4 c	9821±252 b
	SFN₈₀-BC	FI	315.6±3.8 b	24.5±0.1 a	171.2±0.7 b	71.5±0.4 e	8900±147 cd
	SFN₈₀-BC	AWD	326.3±3.8 a	24.1±0.1 cd	180.1±1.3 a	77.4±0.4 c	10159±243 a
F值 F value	年份Year(Y)		3.9	0.0	19.0	939.3^**	0.9
	氮肥模式Nitrogen(N)		1734.5^**	25.8^**	298.0^**	921.5^**	575.2^**
	灌溉模式Irrigation(W)		36^**	66.0^**	184.0^**	1146.6^**	366.1^**
	Y×N		56.1^**	0.0	27.1^**	15.3^**	23.6
	Y×W		1.3	0.0	0.4	0.8	0.5
	N×W		46.1^**	7.6^**	11.4^**	18.8^**	10.1^**
	Y×N×W		0.2	0.0	1.0	0.03	0.4

年份 Year	处理 Treatment		有效穗数 Effective panicle number/(×10⁴·hm^-2)	千粒重 1000-grain weight /g	每穗粒数 Grain number per panicle	结实率 Seed setting rate /%	产量 Grain yield /(kg·hm^-2)
年份 Year	氮肥模式^aNitrogen^a	灌溉模式Irrigation	有效穗数 Effective panicle number/(×10⁴·hm^-2)	千粒重 1000-grain weight /g	每穗粒数 Grain number per panicle	结实率 Seed setting rate /%	产量 Grain yield /(kg·hm^-2)
2019	N₀	FI	230.0±3.5 f	24.4±0.1 ab	130.0±1.8 d	87.0±0.4 b	6554±151 h
	N₀	AWD	207.2±3.8 g	24.2±0.1 bc	147.6±1.3 c	91.6±0.4 a	7119±38 g
	PUN₁₀₀	FI	308.9±7.5 b	24.1±0.2 cd	146.6±1.6 c	78.9±0.7 d	8061±226 e
	PUN₁₀₀	AWD	312.6±3.8 ab	23.6±0.1 e	155.7±2.7 b	83.0±0.4 c	8927±188 c
	PUN₈₀	FI	259.9±3.8 e	24.3±0.2 abc	155.8±2.2 b	79.7±0.5 d	7684±75 g
	PUN₈₀	AWD	275.0±3.8 d	24.4±0.2 ab	163.5±2.5 a	82.8±0.3 c	8136±226 e
	CRFN₈₀-BC	FI	297.7±3.7 c	24.3±0.2 abc	157.2±1.2 b	76.0±0.6 e	8475±188 d
	CRFN₈₀-BC	AWD	320.2±3.8 a	23.9±0.1 d	163.3±1.8 a	82.4±0.8 c	9492±151 b
	SFN₈₀-BC	FI	312.6±3.8 ab	24.5±0.2 a	156.9±1.2 b	76.2±0.8 e	8739±75 cd
	SFN₈₀-BC	AWD	320.2±3.8 a	24.1±0.1 cd	165.0±2.0 a	82.4±0.7 c	9907±188 a
2020	N₀	FI	193.8±3.0 f	24.5±0.1 ab	125.2±1.0 e	84.9±0.2 b	5808±142 i
	N₀	AWD	175.8±2.3 g	24.2±0.1 bc	143.5±2.7 d	89.5±0.2 a	6239±88 h
	PUN₁₀₀	FI	314.8±7.7 b	24.1±0.1 cd	158.5±1.8 c	74.1±0.4 d	8289±92 f
	PUN₁₀₀	AWD	321.7±0.8 ab	23.7±0.1 e	167.6±3.9 b	78.0±0.2 c	9199±194 c
	PUN₈₀	FI	264.9±3.8 e	24.3±0.1 abc	169.2±0.9 b	74.8±0.2 d	7886±31 g
	PUN₈₀	AWD	280.2±3.8 d	24.4±0.1 ab	170.7±1.8 b	77.8±0.2 c	8523±134 ef
	CRFN₈₀-BC	FI	303.4±3.7 c	24.3±0.1 abc	171.6±0.8 b	71.4±0.3 e	8739±284 de
	CRFN₈₀-BC	AWD	326.3±3.8 a	23.9±0.1 d	178.2±1.1 a	77.4±0.4 c	9821±252 b
	SFN₈₀-BC	FI	315.6±3.8 b	24.5±0.1 a	171.2±0.7 b	71.5±0.4 e	8900±147 cd
	SFN₈₀-BC	AWD	326.3±3.8 a	24.1±0.1 cd	180.1±1.3 a	77.4±0.4 c	10159±243 a
F值 F value	年份Year(Y)		3.9	0.0	19.0	939.3^**	0.9
	氮肥模式Nitrogen(N)		1734.5^**	25.8^**	298.0^**	921.5^**	575.2^**
	灌溉模式Irrigation(W)		36^**	66.0^**	184.0^**	1146.6^**	366.1^**
	Y×N		56.1^**	0.0	27.1^**	15.3^**	23.6
	Y×W		1.3	0.0	0.4	0.8	0.5
	N×W		46.1^**	7.6^**	11.4^**	18.8^**	10.1^**
	Y×N×W		0.2	0.0	1.0	0.03	0.4

时期 Stage	处理 Treatment		净光合速率Photosynthetic rate /(μmol·m^-2s^-1)	气孔导度 Stomatal conductance /(mol·m^-2s^-1)	胞间CO₂浓度 Intercellular CO₂ concentration /(μmol·mol^-1)	蒸腾速率Transpiration rate /(mmol·m^-2s^-1)	叶绿素含量Chlorophyll contents /(mg·g^-1)	叶面积指数 Leaf area index	光合积累量 Photosynthate accumulation /(μmol·s^-1)
时期 Stage	氮肥模式 Nitrogen	灌溉模式Irrigation	净光合速率Photosynthetic rate /(μmol·m^-2s^-1)	气孔导度 Stomatal conductance /(mol·m^-2s^-1)	胞间CO₂浓度 Intercellular CO₂ concentration /(μmol·mol^-1)	蒸腾速率Transpiration rate /(mmol·m^-2s^-1)	叶绿素含量Chlorophyll contents /(mg·g^-1)	叶面积指数 Leaf area index	光合积累量 Photosynthate accumulation /(μmol·s^-1)
分蘖期 Tillering	N₀	FI	14.7±1.5 c	0.42±0.05 ab	324.6±21.9 a	7.20±0.46 b	1.80±0.02 d	1.23±0.07 c	1.59±0.16 d
	N₀	AWD	14.5±1.7 c	0.37±0.02 b	309.5±19.3 a	6.94±0.84 b	1.88±0.02 de	1.43±0.14 c	1.84±0.40 d
	PUN₁₀₀	FI	19.2±1.0 ab	0.41±0.02 ab	271.8±7.4 ab	10.40±0.07 a	2.19±0.02 ab	2.97±0.43 b	5.00±0.23 c
	PUN₁₀₀	AWD	19.7±0.2 a	0.48±0.08 ab	280.2±12.1 ab	9.91±0.57 a	2.22±0.01 a	2.75±0.15 b	4.80±0.26 c
	PUN₈₀	FI	18.8±0.5 ab	0.44±0.03 ab	233.2±39.4 b	10.04±0.11 a	2.19±0.06 ab	2.91±0.09 b	4.83±0.08 c
	PUN₈₀	AWD	19.6±0.2 ab	0.45±0.06 ab	277.9±8.1 ab	9.69±0.35 a	2.04±0.17 bc	3.34±0.29 ab	5.79±0.37 ab
	CRFN₈₀-BC	FI	17.7±0.1 ab	0.45±0.04 ab	287.5±6.5 ab	10.03±0.18 a	2.02±0.07 cd	3.33±0.30 ab	5.23±0.34 bc
	CRFN₈₀-BC	AWD	16.8±0.8 bc	0.44±0.05 ab	305.3±15.8 ab	9.42±0.18 a	2.18±0.04 ab	3.25±0.02 ab	4.84±0.48 c
	SFN₈₀-BC	FI	18.8±0.5 ab	0.54±0.06 a	272.7±8.5 a	9.89±0.29 a	2.01±0.03 cd	3.60±0.30 ab	6.01±0.62 a
	SFN₈₀-BC	AWD	18.4±0.6 ab	0.47±0.04 ab	309.2±9.7 a	9.35±0.41 a	1.95±0.05 cde	3.99±0.04 a	6.45±0.21 a
齐穗期 Heading	N₀	FI	16.3±1.3 g	0.41±0.48 b	329.8±22.3 a	7.30±0.81 b	1.78±0.10 bc	1.58 ±0.03 f	2.27±0.22 f
	N₀	AWD	18.3±0.9 fg	0.41±0.22 b	314.4±18.5 a	7.05±0.58 b	1.66±0.05 c	1.96±0.02 e	3.18±0.33 f
	PUN₁₀₀	FI	19.3±0.6 ef	0.40±0.19 b	276.2±7.5 ab	10.65±0.73 a	1.99±0.13 ab	3.85±0.01 c	6.58±0.30 d
	PUN₁₀₀	AWD	23.3±0.5 abc	0.47±0.73 ab	284.7±12.3 ab	9.83±0.36 a	2.08±0.12 a	4.13±0.02 c	8.52±0.68 c
	PUN₈₀	FI	20.6±0.7 def	0.43±0.31 b	236.9±40.1 b	10.64±0.11 a	2.11±0.04 a	4.58±0.19 b	8.37±0.60 c
	PUN₈₀	AWD	21.8±0.6 bcd	0.44±0.54 ab	282.3±8.3 ab	9.63±0.54 a	1.91±0.03 ab	4.19±0.23 c	8.09±0.39 c
	CRFN₈₀-BC	FI	19.5±0.6 def	0.44±0.42 ab	292.1±6.6 ab	10.64±0.19 a	1.96±0.14 ab	3.09±0.31 d	5.34±0.58 e
	CRFN₈₀-BC	AWD	23.6±0.9 ab	0.60±0.61 a	310.2±16.1 a	9.32±0.60 a	1.99±0.13 ab	5.62±0.24 a	11.73±0.48 b
	SFN₈₀-BC	FI	21.0±0.2 cde	0.44±0.55 ab	277.1±8.7 ab	10.49±0.30 a	2.03±0.03 a	4.71±0.13 b	8.76±0.31 c
	SFN₈₀-BC	AWD	24.7±0.8 a	0.54±0.67 ab	314.1±9.9 a	9.58±0.45 a	2.00±0.05 a	5.91±0.10 a	12.89±0.38 a

时期 Stage	处理 Treatment		净光合速率Photosynthetic rate /(μmol·m^-2s^-1)	气孔导度 Stomatal conductance /(mol·m^-2s^-1)	胞间CO₂浓度 Intercellular CO₂ concentration /(μmol·mol^-1)	蒸腾速率Transpiration rate /(mmol·m^-2s^-1)	叶绿素含量Chlorophyll contents /(mg·g^-1)	叶面积指数 Leaf area index	光合积累量 Photosynthate accumulation /(μmol·s^-1)
时期 Stage	氮肥模式 Nitrogen	灌溉模式Irrigation	净光合速率Photosynthetic rate /(μmol·m^-2s^-1)	气孔导度 Stomatal conductance /(mol·m^-2s^-1)	胞间CO₂浓度 Intercellular CO₂ concentration /(μmol·mol^-1)	蒸腾速率Transpiration rate /(mmol·m^-2s^-1)	叶绿素含量Chlorophyll contents /(mg·g^-1)	叶面积指数 Leaf area index	光合积累量 Photosynthate accumulation /(μmol·s^-1)
分蘖期 Tillering	N₀	FI	14.7±1.5 c	0.42±0.05 ab	324.6±21.9 a	7.20±0.46 b	1.80±0.02 d	1.23±0.07 c	1.59±0.16 d
	N₀	AWD	14.5±1.7 c	0.37±0.02 b	309.5±19.3 a	6.94±0.84 b	1.88±0.02 de	1.43±0.14 c	1.84±0.40 d
	PUN₁₀₀	FI	19.2±1.0 ab	0.41±0.02 ab	271.8±7.4 ab	10.40±0.07 a	2.19±0.02 ab	2.97±0.43 b	5.00±0.23 c
	PUN₁₀₀	AWD	19.7±0.2 a	0.48±0.08 ab	280.2±12.1 ab	9.91±0.57 a	2.22±0.01 a	2.75±0.15 b	4.80±0.26 c
	PUN₈₀	FI	18.8±0.5 ab	0.44±0.03 ab	233.2±39.4 b	10.04±0.11 a	2.19±0.06 ab	2.91±0.09 b	4.83±0.08 c
	PUN₈₀	AWD	19.6±0.2 ab	0.45±0.06 ab	277.9±8.1 ab	9.69±0.35 a	2.04±0.17 bc	3.34±0.29 ab	5.79±0.37 ab
	CRFN₈₀-BC	FI	17.7±0.1 ab	0.45±0.04 ab	287.5±6.5 ab	10.03±0.18 a	2.02±0.07 cd	3.33±0.30 ab	5.23±0.34 bc
	CRFN₈₀-BC	AWD	16.8±0.8 bc	0.44±0.05 ab	305.3±15.8 ab	9.42±0.18 a	2.18±0.04 ab	3.25±0.02 ab	4.84±0.48 c
	SFN₈₀-BC	FI	18.8±0.5 ab	0.54±0.06 a	272.7±8.5 a	9.89±0.29 a	2.01±0.03 cd	3.60±0.30 ab	6.01±0.62 a
	SFN₈₀-BC	AWD	18.4±0.6 ab	0.47±0.04 ab	309.2±9.7 a	9.35±0.41 a	1.95±0.05 cde	3.99±0.04 a	6.45±0.21 a
齐穗期 Heading	N₀	FI	16.3±1.3 g	0.41±0.48 b	329.8±22.3 a	7.30±0.81 b	1.78±0.10 bc	1.58 ±0.03 f	2.27±0.22 f
	N₀	AWD	18.3±0.9 fg	0.41±0.22 b	314.4±18.5 a	7.05±0.58 b	1.66±0.05 c	1.96±0.02 e	3.18±0.33 f
	PUN₁₀₀	FI	19.3±0.6 ef	0.40±0.19 b	276.2±7.5 ab	10.65±0.73 a	1.99±0.13 ab	3.85±0.01 c	6.58±0.30 d
	PUN₁₀₀	AWD	23.3±0.5 abc	0.47±0.73 ab	284.7±12.3 ab	9.83±0.36 a	2.08±0.12 a	4.13±0.02 c	8.52±0.68 c
	PUN₈₀	FI	20.6±0.7 def	0.43±0.31 b	236.9±40.1 b	10.64±0.11 a	2.11±0.04 a	4.58±0.19 b	8.37±0.60 c
	PUN₈₀	AWD	21.8±0.6 bcd	0.44±0.54 ab	282.3±8.3 ab	9.63±0.54 a	1.91±0.03 ab	4.19±0.23 c	8.09±0.39 c
	CRFN₈₀-BC	FI	19.5±0.6 def	0.44±0.42 ab	292.1±6.6 ab	10.64±0.19 a	1.96±0.14 ab	3.09±0.31 d	5.34±0.58 e
	CRFN₈₀-BC	AWD	23.6±0.9 ab	0.60±0.61 a	310.2±16.1 a	9.32±0.60 a	1.99±0.13 ab	5.62±0.24 a	11.73±0.48 b
	SFN₈₀-BC	FI	21.0±0.2 cde	0.44±0.55 ab	277.1±8.7 ab	10.49±0.30 a	2.03±0.03 a	4.71±0.13 b	8.76±0.31 c
	SFN₈₀-BC	AWD	24.7±0.8 a	0.54±0.67 ab	314.1±9.9 a	9.58±0.45 a	2.00±0.05 a	5.91±0.10 a	12.89±0.38 a

时期 Stage	处理 Treatment		干物质积累量 Dry matter accumulation/(kg·hm^-2)			收获指数 Harvest index
时期 Stage	氮肥模式 Nitrogen	灌溉模式Irrigation	茎 Stem	叶 Leaf	穗 Panicle	收获指数 Harvest index
分蘖期Tillering	N₀	CF	1134.9±71.1 f	737.4±46.2 f
	N₀	AWD	1639.5±158.1 e	1162.5±112.1 e
	PUN₁₀₀	CF	3259.8±469.5 cd	2050.0±295.3 cd
	PUN₁₀₀	AWD	3849.0±210.3 ab	2390.4±130.6 bc
	PUN₈₀	CF	3325.4±103.2 cd	2053.3±63.7 cd
	PUN₈₀	AWD	3087.4±264.2 d	1927.6±165.0 d
	CRFN₈₀-BC	CF	3435.4±223.4 bcd	2180.0±195.4 cd
	CRFN₈₀-BC	AWD	4110.8±301.7 a	3273.6±240.2 a
	SFN₈₀-BC	CF	3567.1±93.3 bc	2534.9±208.7 b
	SFN₈₀-BC	AWD	4154.0±213.5 a	3385.6±289.5 a
齐穗期Heading	N₀	CF	3990.4±53.2 e	1188.1±57.6 f	967.9±48.6 e
	N₀	AWD	4017.9±.253.0 e	1363.8±81.9 f	1109.1±48.6 de
	PUN₁₀₀	CF	6226.9±186.6 bc	2913.3±102.2 d	1830.2±122.5 b
	PUN₁₀₀	AWD	5286.0±91.5 d	2766.5±102.2 de	1992.3±248.5 b
	PUN₈₀	CF	5755.6±246.4 cd	2627.0±176.2 e	1441.1±32.8 c
	PUN₈₀	AWD	5740.0±624.5 cd	2544.6±109.6 e	1473.3±55.9 c
	CRFN₈₀-BC	CF	5096.4±860.2 d	2688.6±241.1 de	1198.3±71.2 d
	CRFN₈₀-BC	AWD	6178.5±322.4 bc	3479.2±109.0 b	1975.3±106.2 b
	SFN₈₀-BC	CF	6803.0±561.7 ab	3250.4±103.9 c	1933.6±79.1 b
	SFN₈₀-BC	AWD	7486.1±737.5 a	4045.0±80.8 a	2201.2±110.7 a
成熟期Maturity	N₀	CF	9403.8±314.7 e	4577.2±382.0 f	14896.1±329.5 e	0.52±0.0 cde
	N₀	AWD	7658.2±78.2 f	3390.8±87.4 g	14781.6±236.5 e	0.57±0.0 a
	PUN₁₀₀	CF	12498.3±181.5 b	6840.2±65.3 c	19993.7±228.0 bc	0.51±0.0 de
	PUN₁₀₀	AWD	13071.2±432.6 a	7117.4±162.6 bc	21061.4±294.3 a	0.51±0.0 de
	PUN₈₀	CF	11083.2±339.4 cd	6323.0±79.4 d	18922.5±228.7 d	0.52±0.0 bcd
	PUN₈₀	AWD	11342.4±390.0 cd	5786.7±51.4 e	19637.0±364.7 c	0.53±0.0 b
	CRFN₈₀-BC	CF	12404.2±448.3 b	7376.4±168.8 b	20179.6±326.5 bc	0.50±0.0 ef
	CRFN₈₀-BC	AWD	12647.0±279.5 ab	8210.9±330.4 a	20339.7±697.7 b	0.49±0.0 f
	SFN₈₀-BC	CF	11500.3±279.9 c	8022.6±216.9 a	20353.3±393.8 b	0.51±0.0 de
	SFN₈₀-BC	AWD	10844.2±279.7 d	8025.5±276.9 a	21012.5±384.1 a	0.53±0.0 bc