Chinese Journal OF Rice Science ›› 2021, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 466-474.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2021.200802
• Research Papers • Previous Articles Next Articles
Xiangan TANG1,2, Jinshui XIE1,2,*(), Changxu XU2,*(), Jia LIU2, Fusheng YUAN2, Guangrong LIU2, Zuzhang LI2
Received:
2020-08-03
Revised:
2021-03-17
Online:
2021-09-10
Published:
2021-09-10
Contact:
Jinshui XIE, Changxu XU
唐先干1,2, 谢金水1,2,*(), 徐昌旭2,*(), 刘佳2, 袁福生2, 刘光荣2, 李祖章2
通讯作者:
谢金水,徐昌旭
基金资助:
Xiangan TANG, Jinshui XIE, Changxu XU, Jia LIU, Fusheng YUAN, Guangrong LIU, Zuzhang LI. Effects of Chinese Milk Vetch and Reduced Chemical Fertilizer Application on Quality and Nutrient Uptake of Early Rice in Red Soil Paddy Field[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2021, 35(5): 466-474.
唐先干, 谢金水, 徐昌旭, 刘佳, 袁福生, 刘光荣, 李祖章. 红壤性稻田紫云英与化肥减施对早稻品质与养分吸收的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(5): 466-474.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.ricesci.cn/EN/10.16819/j.1001-7216.2021.200802
处理 Treatment | 穗长 Panicle length /cm | 有效穗数 Effective panicle number/(×104·hm-2) | 结实率 Seed setting rate/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | 每穗粒数 Spikelet number per panicle | 2018年实际产量 Yield in 2018 /(kg·hm-2) | 2019年实际产量 Yield in 2019 /(kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 17.5±1.2 b | 224.7±48.3 b | 92.2±1.1 a | 25.8±0.6 a | 94.7±11.1 c | 4629±557 c | 4698±470 d |
G | 18.9±0.8 ab | 298.2±25.2 ab | 90.1±1.1 ab | 25.0±0.3 b | 105.9±10.8 b | 5883±196 b | 5989±201 c |
N100 | 19.9±0.3 a | 323.4±37.8 ab | 88.4±1.9 b | 24.9±0.4 b | 129.5±12.6 a | 8214±229 a | 8378±234 a |
GN100 | 20.3±1.2 a | 352.8±31.5 a | 87.3±2.9 b | 24.8±0.3 b | 129.5±6.6 a | 8186±334 a | 8513±287 a |
GN80 | 19.2±0.7 ab | 363.3±56.7 a | 88.6±2.3 b | 24.8±0.3 b | 112.7±8.2 ab | 8254±159 a | 8667±208 a |
GN60 | 19.2±0.8 ab | 340.2±37.8 a | 88.4±2.4 b | 25.0±0.1 b | 113.2±7.0 ab | 7752±235 a | 7558±229 b |
Table 1 Effect of Chinese milk vetch returning and chemical fertilizer reduction on rice yield and its components.
处理 Treatment | 穗长 Panicle length /cm | 有效穗数 Effective panicle number/(×104·hm-2) | 结实率 Seed setting rate/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | 每穗粒数 Spikelet number per panicle | 2018年实际产量 Yield in 2018 /(kg·hm-2) | 2019年实际产量 Yield in 2019 /(kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 17.5±1.2 b | 224.7±48.3 b | 92.2±1.1 a | 25.8±0.6 a | 94.7±11.1 c | 4629±557 c | 4698±470 d |
G | 18.9±0.8 ab | 298.2±25.2 ab | 90.1±1.1 ab | 25.0±0.3 b | 105.9±10.8 b | 5883±196 b | 5989±201 c |
N100 | 19.9±0.3 a | 323.4±37.8 ab | 88.4±1.9 b | 24.9±0.4 b | 129.5±12.6 a | 8214±229 a | 8378±234 a |
GN100 | 20.3±1.2 a | 352.8±31.5 a | 87.3±2.9 b | 24.8±0.3 b | 129.5±6.6 a | 8186±334 a | 8513±287 a |
GN80 | 19.2±0.7 ab | 363.3±56.7 a | 88.6±2.3 b | 24.8±0.3 b | 112.7±8.2 ab | 8254±159 a | 8667±208 a |
GN60 | 19.2±0.8 ab | 340.2±37.8 a | 88.4±2.4 b | 25.0±0.1 b | 113.2±7.0 ab | 7752±235 a | 7558±229 b |
处理 Treatment | 糙米率 Brown rice rate/% | 精米率 Milled rice rate/% | 整精米率Head rice rate/% | 垩白度Chalkiness degree/% | 垩白粒率 Chalky rice rate/% | 粒长 Grain length /mm | 长宽比Length- width ratio | 碱消值 Alkali spreading value | 胶稠度 Gel consistency /mm | 直链淀粉Amylose content/% | 蛋白质Protein content/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 82.5±0.2 b | 69.9±1.6 a | 39.5±3.5 b | 9.3±0.9 bc | 48.7±15 b | 5.8±0.1 a | 2.3±0.1 a | 5.2±0.0 a | 84.3±2.5 a | 27.0±0.1 a | 6.4±0.6 c |
G | 82.7±0.2 b | 70.4±3.3 a | 41.5±6.9 b | 11.4±1.9 a | 64.0±6.2 a | 5.8±0.1 a | 2.2±0.1 a | 5.2±0.1 a | 82.7±3.1 ab | 26.8±0.3 a | 6.5±0.3 c |
N100 | 83.5±0.2 a | 72.4±2.0 a | 45.9±3.0 ab | 8.4±0.7 c | 61.0±9.5 ab | 5.7±0.0 a | 2.2±0.0 a | 5.2±0.1 a | 77.3±4.7 b | 26.7±0.3 a | 7.9±0.3 a |
GN100 | 83.7±0.2 a | 72.7±3.4 a | 53.0±0.5 a | 11.3±1.0 a | 74.7±4.2 a | 5.8±0.1 a | 2.2±0.0 a | 5.2±0.1 a | 82.7±1.5 ab | 26.8±0.6 a | 7.4±0.3 ab |
GN80 | 83.7±0.3 a | 71.1±4.8 a | 53.2±1.1 a | 10.8±0.7 ab | 73.3±2.1 a | 5.8±0.2 a | 2.2±0.1 a | 5.2±0.1 a | 81.0±2.6 ab | 27.0±0.1 a | 7.4±0.3 ab |
GN60 | 83.7±0.4 a | 74.5±0.5 a | 52.6±4.2 a | 10.8±0.4 ab | 71.7±6.4 a | 5.8±0.1 a | 2.2±0.0 a | 5.3±0.1 a | 80.0±4.0 ab | 26.6±0.3 a | 7.0±0.4 bc |
Table 2 Effect of Chinese milk vetch and chemical fertilizer reduction on rice quality.
处理 Treatment | 糙米率 Brown rice rate/% | 精米率 Milled rice rate/% | 整精米率Head rice rate/% | 垩白度Chalkiness degree/% | 垩白粒率 Chalky rice rate/% | 粒长 Grain length /mm | 长宽比Length- width ratio | 碱消值 Alkali spreading value | 胶稠度 Gel consistency /mm | 直链淀粉Amylose content/% | 蛋白质Protein content/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 82.5±0.2 b | 69.9±1.6 a | 39.5±3.5 b | 9.3±0.9 bc | 48.7±15 b | 5.8±0.1 a | 2.3±0.1 a | 5.2±0.0 a | 84.3±2.5 a | 27.0±0.1 a | 6.4±0.6 c |
G | 82.7±0.2 b | 70.4±3.3 a | 41.5±6.9 b | 11.4±1.9 a | 64.0±6.2 a | 5.8±0.1 a | 2.2±0.1 a | 5.2±0.1 a | 82.7±3.1 ab | 26.8±0.3 a | 6.5±0.3 c |
N100 | 83.5±0.2 a | 72.4±2.0 a | 45.9±3.0 ab | 8.4±0.7 c | 61.0±9.5 ab | 5.7±0.0 a | 2.2±0.0 a | 5.2±0.1 a | 77.3±4.7 b | 26.7±0.3 a | 7.9±0.3 a |
GN100 | 83.7±0.2 a | 72.7±3.4 a | 53.0±0.5 a | 11.3±1.0 a | 74.7±4.2 a | 5.8±0.1 a | 2.2±0.0 a | 5.2±0.1 a | 82.7±1.5 ab | 26.8±0.6 a | 7.4±0.3 ab |
GN80 | 83.7±0.3 a | 71.1±4.8 a | 53.2±1.1 a | 10.8±0.7 ab | 73.3±2.1 a | 5.8±0.2 a | 2.2±0.1 a | 5.2±0.1 a | 81.0±2.6 ab | 27.0±0.1 a | 7.4±0.3 ab |
GN60 | 83.7±0.4 a | 74.5±0.5 a | 52.6±4.2 a | 10.8±0.4 ab | 71.7±6.4 a | 5.8±0.1 a | 2.2±0.0 a | 5.3±0.1 a | 80.0±4.0 ab | 26.6±0.3 a | 7.0±0.4 bc |
处理Treatment | N | P | K | Ca | Mg | Si |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 7.75±0.55 c | 2.98±0.11 a | 4.63±0.04 a | 0.45±0.08 a | 0.33±0.02 a | 10.76±1.06 a |
G | 8.40±0.80 c | 2.94±0.27 a | 4.31±0.31 a | 0.52±0.09 a | 0.35±0.01 a | 8.36±1.00 b |
N100 | 9.09±0.42 b | 2.84±0.24 a | 4.59±0.36 a | 0.48±0.12 a | 0.37±0.07 a | 7.61±1.61 bc |
GN100 | 10.00±0.60 a | 3.05±0.35 a | 4.56±0.18 a | 0.44±0.07 a | 0.37±0.07 a | 7.21±1.49 bc |
GN80 | 9.35±0.13 ab | 2.79±0.25 a | 4.39±0.28 a | 0.45±0.07 a | 0.34±0.09 a | 5.80±0.40 c |
GN60 | 8.60±0.65 bc | 2.93±0.45 a | 4.45±0.56 a | 0.47±0.13 a | 0.33±0.07 a | 6.87±1.24 bc |
Table 3 Effect of Chinese milk vetch and chemical fertilizer reduction on grain nutrient contents. mg/g
处理Treatment | N | P | K | Ca | Mg | Si |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 7.75±0.55 c | 2.98±0.11 a | 4.63±0.04 a | 0.45±0.08 a | 0.33±0.02 a | 10.76±1.06 a |
G | 8.40±0.80 c | 2.94±0.27 a | 4.31±0.31 a | 0.52±0.09 a | 0.35±0.01 a | 8.36±1.00 b |
N100 | 9.09±0.42 b | 2.84±0.24 a | 4.59±0.36 a | 0.48±0.12 a | 0.37±0.07 a | 7.61±1.61 bc |
GN100 | 10.00±0.60 a | 3.05±0.35 a | 4.56±0.18 a | 0.44±0.07 a | 0.37±0.07 a | 7.21±1.49 bc |
GN80 | 9.35±0.13 ab | 2.79±0.25 a | 4.39±0.28 a | 0.45±0.07 a | 0.34±0.09 a | 5.80±0.40 c |
GN60 | 8.60±0.65 bc | 2.93±0.45 a | 4.45±0.56 a | 0.47±0.13 a | 0.33±0.07 a | 6.87±1.24 bc |
Fig. 1. Effect of Chinese milk vetch and chemical fertilizer reduction on uptake of N, P, K, Ca, Mg and Si by grain. Different lowercase letters on the bars represent significant difference between treatments(P<0.05).
籽粒养分 Rice nutrient | 糙米率 Brown rice rate | 精米率 Milled rice rate | 整精米率 Head rice rate | 垩白度 Chalkiness degree | 垩白粒率 Chalky rice rate | 碱消值 Alkali spreading value | 胶稠度 Gel consistency | 直链淀粉Amylose content | 蛋白质 Protein content | 产量 Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
籽粒养分吸收Nutrient uptake by grain | ||||||||||
N | 0.910** | 0.380 | 0.720** | 0.160 | 0.788** | -0.110 | -0.420 | -0.180 | 0.773** | 0.966** |
P | 0.874** | 0.508* | 0.671** | 0.170 | 0.776** | -0.100 | -0.487* | -0.190 | 0.726** | 0.898** |
K | 0.878** | 0.440 | 0.697** | 0.030 | 0.702** | -0.130 | -0.460 | -0.180 | 0.769** | 0.947** |
Ca | 0.634** | 0.629** | 0.511* | 0.190 | 0.674** | 0.030 | -0.619** | -0.450 | 0.688** | 0.716** |
Mg | 0.767** | 0.635** | 0.540* | 0.140 | 0.701** | -0.030 | -0.532* | -0.210 | 0.748** | 0.794** |
Si | 0.130 | -0.020 | 0.240 | -0.180 | -0.020 | 0.090 | -0.340 | -0.190 | 0.290 | 0.330 |
籽粒养分含量Grain nutrient content | ||||||||||
N | 0.775** | 0.280 | 0.581* | 0.200 | 0.696** | -0.260 | -0.290 | -0.120 | 0.688** | 0.730** |
P | 0.060 | 0.290 | -0.020 | 0.070 | 0.130 | -0.190 | -0.160 | 0.050 | 0.080 | -0.100 |
K | 0.060 | 0.230 | 0.060 | -0.370 | -0.100 | -0.270 | -0.150 | 0.120 | 0.230 | -0.010 |
Ca | -0.110 | 0.440 | -0.050 | 0.180 | 0.110 | 0.030 | -0.270 | -0.420 | 0.140 | -0.110 |
Mg | 0.280 | 0.596** | 0.110 | 0.110 | 0.340 | -0.030 | -0.380 | -0.100 | 0.410 | 0.230 |
Si | -0.789** | -0.390 | -0.532* | -0.320 | -0.777** | 0.130 | 0.190 | 0.140 | -0.501* | -0.743** |
Table 4 Correlation between yield, quality and nutrients in rice.
籽粒养分 Rice nutrient | 糙米率 Brown rice rate | 精米率 Milled rice rate | 整精米率 Head rice rate | 垩白度 Chalkiness degree | 垩白粒率 Chalky rice rate | 碱消值 Alkali spreading value | 胶稠度 Gel consistency | 直链淀粉Amylose content | 蛋白质 Protein content | 产量 Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
籽粒养分吸收Nutrient uptake by grain | ||||||||||
N | 0.910** | 0.380 | 0.720** | 0.160 | 0.788** | -0.110 | -0.420 | -0.180 | 0.773** | 0.966** |
P | 0.874** | 0.508* | 0.671** | 0.170 | 0.776** | -0.100 | -0.487* | -0.190 | 0.726** | 0.898** |
K | 0.878** | 0.440 | 0.697** | 0.030 | 0.702** | -0.130 | -0.460 | -0.180 | 0.769** | 0.947** |
Ca | 0.634** | 0.629** | 0.511* | 0.190 | 0.674** | 0.030 | -0.619** | -0.450 | 0.688** | 0.716** |
Mg | 0.767** | 0.635** | 0.540* | 0.140 | 0.701** | -0.030 | -0.532* | -0.210 | 0.748** | 0.794** |
Si | 0.130 | -0.020 | 0.240 | -0.180 | -0.020 | 0.090 | -0.340 | -0.190 | 0.290 | 0.330 |
籽粒养分含量Grain nutrient content | ||||||||||
N | 0.775** | 0.280 | 0.581* | 0.200 | 0.696** | -0.260 | -0.290 | -0.120 | 0.688** | 0.730** |
P | 0.060 | 0.290 | -0.020 | 0.070 | 0.130 | -0.190 | -0.160 | 0.050 | 0.080 | -0.100 |
K | 0.060 | 0.230 | 0.060 | -0.370 | -0.100 | -0.270 | -0.150 | 0.120 | 0.230 | -0.010 |
Ca | -0.110 | 0.440 | -0.050 | 0.180 | 0.110 | 0.030 | -0.270 | -0.420 | 0.140 | -0.110 |
Mg | 0.280 | 0.596** | 0.110 | 0.110 | 0.340 | -0.030 | -0.380 | -0.100 | 0.410 | 0.230 |
Si | -0.789** | -0.390 | -0.532* | -0.320 | -0.777** | 0.130 | 0.190 | 0.140 | -0.501* | -0.743** |
处理 Treatment | pH值 pH value | 有机质 Organic matter /(g·kg-1) | 全氮 Total N /(g·kg-1) | 全磷 Total P /(g·kg-1) | 全钾 Total K /(g·kg-1) | 碱解氮 Alkaline N /(mg·kg-1) | 有效磷 Available P /(mg·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available K /(mg·kg-1) | 交换性钙 Exchangeable Ca /(cmol·kg-1) | 交换性镁 Exchangeable Mg /(cmol·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 5.55±0.24 a | 24.31±2.95 b | 1.21±0.13 a | 0.48±0.09 a | 18.77±1.88 a | 81.25±6.54 b | 13.27±4.14 b | 57.00±3.00 bc | 2.54±0.30 ab | 0.63±0.11 b |
G | 5.65±0.15 a | 27.84±1.18 a | 1.47±0.34 a | 0.49±0.03 a | 21.48±0.52 a | 80.56±4.30 b | 13.15±3.20 b | 54.00±5.00 c | 2.81±0.03 a | 0.66±0.06 ab |
N100 | 5.90±0.12 a | 24.78±2.51 ab | 1.38±0.03 a | 0.45±0.01 a | 20.33±2.41 a | 84.55±2.87 b | 23.46±9.31 a | 75.33±10.69 a | 2.68±0.44 ab | 0.81±0.04 a |
GN100 | 5.71±0.14 a | 25.59±3.57 ab | 1.23±0.10 a | 0.45±0.11 a | 20.57±0.22 a | 92.31±9.01 ab | 19.69±3.07 ab | 68.00±14.93 ab | 2.35±0.52 b | 0.67±0.07 ab |
GN80 | 5.63±0.15 a | 25.70±1.80 ab | 1.51±0.25 a | 0.56±0.08 a | 21.25±1.37 a | 98.51±6.49 a | 17.71±2.88 ab | 72.00±8.54 ab | 2.04±0.17 c | 0.65±0.09 b |
GN60 | 5.65±0.33 a | 26.52±2.78 ab | 1.29±0.13 a | 0.54±0.04 a | 22.15±1.09 a | 96.13±3.93 ab | 18.55±3.25 ab | 57.33±4.16 bc | 2.00±0.19 c | 0.71±0.09 ab |
Table 5 Effect of Chinese milk vetch and chemical fertilizer reduction on soil nutrients
处理 Treatment | pH值 pH value | 有机质 Organic matter /(g·kg-1) | 全氮 Total N /(g·kg-1) | 全磷 Total P /(g·kg-1) | 全钾 Total K /(g·kg-1) | 碱解氮 Alkaline N /(mg·kg-1) | 有效磷 Available P /(mg·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available K /(mg·kg-1) | 交换性钙 Exchangeable Ca /(cmol·kg-1) | 交换性镁 Exchangeable Mg /(cmol·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 5.55±0.24 a | 24.31±2.95 b | 1.21±0.13 a | 0.48±0.09 a | 18.77±1.88 a | 81.25±6.54 b | 13.27±4.14 b | 57.00±3.00 bc | 2.54±0.30 ab | 0.63±0.11 b |
G | 5.65±0.15 a | 27.84±1.18 a | 1.47±0.34 a | 0.49±0.03 a | 21.48±0.52 a | 80.56±4.30 b | 13.15±3.20 b | 54.00±5.00 c | 2.81±0.03 a | 0.66±0.06 ab |
N100 | 5.90±0.12 a | 24.78±2.51 ab | 1.38±0.03 a | 0.45±0.01 a | 20.33±2.41 a | 84.55±2.87 b | 23.46±9.31 a | 75.33±10.69 a | 2.68±0.44 ab | 0.81±0.04 a |
GN100 | 5.71±0.14 a | 25.59±3.57 ab | 1.23±0.10 a | 0.45±0.11 a | 20.57±0.22 a | 92.31±9.01 ab | 19.69±3.07 ab | 68.00±14.93 ab | 2.35±0.52 b | 0.67±0.07 ab |
GN80 | 5.63±0.15 a | 25.70±1.80 ab | 1.51±0.25 a | 0.56±0.08 a | 21.25±1.37 a | 98.51±6.49 a | 17.71±2.88 ab | 72.00±8.54 ab | 2.04±0.17 c | 0.65±0.09 b |
GN60 | 5.65±0.33 a | 26.52±2.78 ab | 1.29±0.13 a | 0.54±0.04 a | 22.15±1.09 a | 96.13±3.93 ab | 18.55±3.25 ab | 57.33±4.16 bc | 2.00±0.19 c | 0.71±0.09 ab |
籽粒养分 Rice nutrient | pH值 pH value | 有机质 Organic matter | 全氮 Total N | 全磷 Total P | 全钾 Total K | 碱解氮 Alkaline N | 有效磷 Available P | 速效钾 Available K | 交换性钙 Exchangeable Ca | 交换性镁 Exchangeable Mg |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
籽粒养分吸收Nutrient uptake by grain | ||||||||||
N | 0.250 | -0.040 | 0.030 | 0.000 | -0.050 | 0.613** | 0.508* | 0.590** | -0.380 | 0.280 |
P | 0.060 | 0.160 | 0.050 | -0.030 | -0.010 | 0.577* | 0.507* | 0.410 | -0.480* | 0.140 |
K | 0.200 | 0.140 | 0.100 | 0.040 | 0.010 | 0.610** | 0.617** | 0.533* | -0.380 | 0.250 |
Ca | -0.170 | 0.190 | 0.350 | -0.090 | 0.150 | 0.320 | 0.220 | 0.220 | -0.489* | 0.190 |
Mg | 0.000 | 0.050 | 0.110 | -0.160 | -0.060 | 0.390 | 0.420 | 0.340 | -0.460 | 0.170 |
Si | 0.300 | 0.110 | -0.050 | 0.110 | -0.010 | 0.150 | 0.250 | 0.280 | 0.340 | 0.160 |
籽粒养分含量Grain nutrient content | ||||||||||
N | 0.080 | -0.130 | -0.130 | -0.200 | -0.260 | 0.491* | 0.310 | 0.460 | -0.330 | 0.060 |
P | -0.574* | 0.280 | -0.140 | -0.280 | -0.200 | -0.080 | -0.060 | -0.300 | -0.544* | -0.469* |
K | -0.350 | 0.290 | -0.050 | -0.210 | -0.240 | -0.010 | 0.230 | -0.040 | -0.440 | -0.290 |
Ca | -0.642** | 0.280 | 0.430 | -0.200 | 0.140 | -0.290 | -0.330 | -0.340 | -0.290 | -0.160 |
Mg | -0.360 | 0.080 | 0.090 | -0.330 | -0.150 | -0.070 | 0.090 | -0.070 | -0.460 | -0.130 |
Si | -0.130 | -0.010 | -0.140 | -0.030 | -0.130 | -0.501* | -0.370 | -0.340 | 0.300 | -0.240 |
Table 6 Correlation between soil nutrients and rice nutrient uptake.
籽粒养分 Rice nutrient | pH值 pH value | 有机质 Organic matter | 全氮 Total N | 全磷 Total P | 全钾 Total K | 碱解氮 Alkaline N | 有效磷 Available P | 速效钾 Available K | 交换性钙 Exchangeable Ca | 交换性镁 Exchangeable Mg |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
籽粒养分吸收Nutrient uptake by grain | ||||||||||
N | 0.250 | -0.040 | 0.030 | 0.000 | -0.050 | 0.613** | 0.508* | 0.590** | -0.380 | 0.280 |
P | 0.060 | 0.160 | 0.050 | -0.030 | -0.010 | 0.577* | 0.507* | 0.410 | -0.480* | 0.140 |
K | 0.200 | 0.140 | 0.100 | 0.040 | 0.010 | 0.610** | 0.617** | 0.533* | -0.380 | 0.250 |
Ca | -0.170 | 0.190 | 0.350 | -0.090 | 0.150 | 0.320 | 0.220 | 0.220 | -0.489* | 0.190 |
Mg | 0.000 | 0.050 | 0.110 | -0.160 | -0.060 | 0.390 | 0.420 | 0.340 | -0.460 | 0.170 |
Si | 0.300 | 0.110 | -0.050 | 0.110 | -0.010 | 0.150 | 0.250 | 0.280 | 0.340 | 0.160 |
籽粒养分含量Grain nutrient content | ||||||||||
N | 0.080 | -0.130 | -0.130 | -0.200 | -0.260 | 0.491* | 0.310 | 0.460 | -0.330 | 0.060 |
P | -0.574* | 0.280 | -0.140 | -0.280 | -0.200 | -0.080 | -0.060 | -0.300 | -0.544* | -0.469* |
K | -0.350 | 0.290 | -0.050 | -0.210 | -0.240 | -0.010 | 0.230 | -0.040 | -0.440 | -0.290 |
Ca | -0.642** | 0.280 | 0.430 | -0.200 | 0.140 | -0.290 | -0.330 | -0.340 | -0.290 | -0.160 |
Mg | -0.360 | 0.080 | 0.090 | -0.330 | -0.150 | -0.070 | 0.090 | -0.070 | -0.460 | -0.130 |
Si | -0.130 | -0.010 | -0.140 | -0.030 | -0.130 | -0.501* | -0.370 | -0.340 | 0.300 | -0.240 |
[1] | 曹卫东, 包兴国, 徐昌旭, 聂军, 高亚军, 耿明建. 中国绿肥科研60年回顾与未来展望[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(6): 1450-1461. |
Cao W D, Bao X G, Xu C X, Nie J, Gao Y J, Geng M J. Reviews and prospects on science and technology of green manure in China[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2017, 23(6): 1450-1461. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 陈明江, 刘贵富, 余泓, 王冰, 李家洋. 水稻高产优质的分子基础与品种设计[J]. 科学通报, 2018, 63(14): 1275-1289. |
Chen M J, Liu G F, Yu Y, Wang B, Li J Y. Towards molecular design of rice plant architecture and grain quality[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2018, 63(14): 1275-1289. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 张浪周玲红魏甲彬, 成小琳, 徐华勤, 肖志祥, 唐启源, 唐剑武. 冬季种养结合对双季稻生长与土壤肥力的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 32(3): 226-236. |
Zhang L, Zhou L H, Wei J B, Cheng X L, Xu H Q, Xiao Z X, Tang Q Y, Tang J W. Effects of rice planting combined with chicken raising in winter on double-cropping rice growth and soil fertility[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2018, 32(3): 226-236. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 高嵩涓, 曹卫东, 白金顺, 高菊生, 黄晶, 曾闹华, 常单娜, 志水胜好. 长期冬种绿肥改变红壤稻田土壤微生物生物量特性[J]. 土壤学报, 2015, 52(4): 902-910. |
Gao S J, Cao W D, Bai J S, Gao J S, Huang J, Zeng N H, Chang D N, Zhi S S H. Long-term application of winter green manures changed the soil microbial biomass properties in red paddy soil[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2015, 52(4): 902-910. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 杨曾平, 高菊生, 郑圣先, 聂军, 徐明岗, 谢坚, 廖育林. 长期冬种绿肥对红壤性水稻土微生物特性及酶活性的影响[J]. 土壤, 2011, 43(4): 576-583. |
Yang Z P, Gao J S, Zheng S X, Nie J, Xu M G, Xie J, Liao Y L. Effects of long-term winter planting-green manure on microbial properties and enzyme activities in reddish paddy soil[J]. Soils, 2011, 43(4): 576-583. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 王丹英, 彭建, 徐春梅, 赵锋, 章秀福. 油菜作绿肥还田的培肥效应及对水稻生长的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2012, 26(1): 85-91. |
Wang D Y, Peng J, Xu C M, Zhao F, Zhang X F. Effects of rape straw manuring on soil fertility and rice growth[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2011, 26(1): 85-91. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 万水霞, 朱宏斌, 唐杉, 郭熙盛, 王允青. 紫云英与化肥配施对安徽沿江双季稻区土壤生物学特性的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(2):387-395. |
Wan S X, Zhu H B, Tang S, Guo X S, Wang Y Q. Effects of Astragalus sinicus manure and fertilizer combined application on biological properties of soil in Anhui double cropping rice areas along the Yangtze River[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2015, 21(2):387-395. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 周国朋, 谢志坚, 曹卫东, 徐昌旭, 白金顺, 曾闹华, 高嵩涓, 杨璐. 稻草高茬-紫云英联合还田改善土壤肥力提高作物产量[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(23): 157-163. |
Zhou G P, Xie Z J, Cao W D, Xu C X, Bai J S, Zeng N H, Gao S J, Yang L. Co-incorporation of high rice stubble and Chinese milk vetch improving soil fertility and yield of rice[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017, 33(23): 157-163. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 刘春增, 刘小粉, 李本银, 王守刚, 吕玉虎, 潘兹亮, 曹卫东. 紫云英配施不同用量化肥对土壤养分、团聚性及水稻产量的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2013, 44(2): 409-413. |
Liu C Z, Liu X F, Li B Y, Wang S G, Lü Y H, Pan Z L, Cao W D . Effects of applying Chinese milk vetch with different amounts of chemical fertilizer on soil nutrients, aggregation and rice yield[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2013, 44(2): 409-413. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 刘威, 王晓雨, 朱德雄, 詹鹏, 李培根, 戴志刚, 鲁剑巍, 耿明建. 紫云英与化肥配比施用对早稻养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2017, 56(8): 1438-1444. |
Liu W, Wang X Y, Zhu D X, Zhan P, Li P G, Dai Z G, Lu J W, Geng M J. Effects of combining application of Astragalus sinicus and chemical fertilizer on nutrient absorption and yield of early rice[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 56(8): 1438-1444. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社,1999. |
Lu R K. Analytical methods for soil and agro-chemistry[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 1999. (in Chinese) | |
[12] | 刘世平, 聂新涛, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲. 免耕套种与秸秆还田对水稻生长及稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2007, 21(1): 71-76. |
Liu S P, Nie X T, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K. Effects of interplanting with zero tillage and wheat straw manuring on rice growth and grain quality[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2007, 21(1): 71-76. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 严奉君, 孙永健, 马均, 徐徽, 李玥, 代邹, 杨志远. 不同土壤肥力条件下麦秆还田与氮肥运筹对杂交稻氮素利用、产量及米质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2015, 29(1): 56-64. |
Yan F J, Sun Y J, Ma J, Xu H, Li Y, Dai Z, Yang Z Y. Effects of wheat straw mulching and nitrogen management on grain yield, rice quality and nitrogen utilization in hybrid rice under different soil fertility conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2015, 29(1): 56-64. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 曾研华, 吴建富, 潘晓华, 石庆华, 朱德峰. 稻草不同还田方式对双季水稻产量及稻米品质的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(3): 534-542. |
Zeng Y H, Wu J F, P X H, Shi Q H, Zhu D F. Effects of rice straw incorporation on soil physical, chemical and biological properties in double cropping paddy fields[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2013, 19(3): 534-542. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 陈培峰,董明辉,顾俊荣, 惠锋, 乔中英, 杨代凤, 刘腾飞. 麦秸还田与氮肥运筹对超级稻强弱势粒粒重与品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2012, 26(6): 715-722. |
Chen P F, Dong M H, Gu J R, Hui F, Qiao Z Y, Yang D F, Liu T F. Effects of returning wheat-residue to field and nitrogen management on grain weight and quality of superior and inferior grains in super rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2012, 26(6): 715-722. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 汤文光, 唐海明, 罗尊长, 汪柯, 杨光立, 肖小平. 不同种植模式对稻田土壤重金属含量及晚稻稻米品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2011, 37(8): 1457-1464. |
Tang W G, Tang H M, Luo Z C, Wang K, Yang G L, Xiao X P. Impacts of winter planting patterns on soil heavy metal content and grain quality in late rice in double cropping rice area[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2011, 37(8): 1457-1464. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 符冠富, 王丹英, 徐春梅, 彭建, 韩博, 陶龙兴, 章秀福. 稻田冬季保护性耕作对土壤酶活性以及稻米品质的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15(3): 618-624. |
Fu G F, Wang D Y, Xu C M, Peng J, Han B, Tao L X, Zhang X F. Effect of winter conservation tillage in paddy field on soil enzyme activities and grain quality[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2009, 15(3): 618-624. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 吴关庭, 李旭晨. 稻米食味的研究与改良[J]. 中国农学通报, 2000, 16(6): 21-24. |
Wu G T, Li X C. Research and improvement of rice taste[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2000, 16(6): 21-24. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 杨静, 罗秋香, 钱春荣, 刘海英, 金正勋. 氮素对稻米蛋白质组分含量及蒸煮食味品质的影响[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2006, 37(2):145-150. |
Yang J, Luo Q X, Qian C R, Liu H Y, Jin Z X. Effect of nitrogen on the protein fractions content and cooking and eating quality of rice grain[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2006, 37(2): 145-150. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 谢宏, 原蓼蓼, 李丹丹, 梁婧婧. 含二硫键的稻米蛋白质对米饭蒸煮食味品质的影响[J]. 食品科技, 2012, 37(9): 139-142. |
Xie H, Yuan L L, Li D D, Liang J J. Impacts of proteins on cooking and eating properties of rice[J]. Food Science and Technology, 2012, 37(9): 139-142. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 石吕, 张新月, 孙惠艳, 曹先梅, 刘建, 张祖建. 不同类型水稻品种稻米蛋白质含量与蒸煮食味品质的关系及后期氮肥的效应[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(6): 541-552. |
Shi L, Zhang X Y, Sun H Y, Cao X M, Liu J, Zhang Z J. Relationship of grain protein content with cooking and eating quality as affected by nitrogen fertilizer at late growth stage for different types of rice varieties[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2019, 33(6): 541-552. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 商全玉, 张文忠, 韩亚东, 荣蓉, 徐海, 徐正进, 陈温福. 硅肥对北方粳稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2009, 23(06): 661-664. |
Shang Q Y, Zhang W Z, Han Y D, Rong R, Xu H, Xu Z J, Chen W F. Effect of Si fertilizer application on yield and grain quality of japonica rice from northeast China[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2009, 23(06): 661-664. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 蔡德龙. 国内外硅肥研究与应用进展[J]. 磷肥与复肥, 2017, 32(1): 37-39. |
Cai D L. Progress in research and application of silicon fertilizer at home and abroad[J]. Phosphate and Compound Fertilizer, 2017, 32(1): 37-39. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 李祖章, 陶其骧, 刘光荣, 章和珍, 刘益仁. 江西省耕地土壤有效硅含量调查研究[J]. 江西农业学报, 1999, 11(3): 1-9. |
Li Z Z, Tao Q X, Liu G R, Zhang H Z, Liu Y R. Investigation of available silicon content in cultivated soil in Jiangxi Province[J]. Acta Agriculture Jiangxi, 1999, 11(3): 1-9. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 钱永德, 左豫虎, 郑桂萍, 李晓蕾, 马艳, 赵凤亮.氮镁耦合对寒地早粳龙粳20商品品质影响[J].核农学报,2013,27(1):118-125. |
Qian Y D, Zuo Y H, Zheng G P, Li X L, Ma Y, Zhao F L. Effects of nitrogen and magnesium coupling on commercial qualities of the early japonica Longjing 20 in cold region[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 27(1): 118-125. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | 马艳, 郑桂萍, 赵洋, 蔡永盛, 李丹丹, 郑悦, 潘世驹, 胡法龙, 李晓蕾.硫酸镁对水稻光合特性和品质的影响[J]. 黑龙江八一农垦大学学报, 2014, 26(6): 1-6. |
Ma Y, Zheng G P, Zhao Y, Cai Y S, Li D D, Zheng Y, Pan S J, Hu F L, Li X L. Effects of magnesium sulfate on photosynthetic characteristics and quality of rice[J]. Journal of Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, 2014, 26(6): 1-6. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | 徐昌旭, 谢志坚, 许政良, 苏全平, 李水荣, 秦文婧. 等量紫云英条件下化肥用量对早稻养分吸收和干物质积累的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2010, 22(10): 13-15. |
Xu C X, Xie Z J, Xu Z L, Su Q P, Li S R, Qin W J. Effects of applying mineral fertilizer reasonably on nutrient absorption and dry matter accumulation of early rice under applying equivalent Astragalus sinicus[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2010, 22(10): 13-15. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | 王建红, 曹凯, 张贤. 紫云英翻压量对单季晚稻养分吸收和产量的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(1): 156-163. |
Wang J H, Cao K, Z X. Effects of incorporation amounts of Chinese milk vetch on nutrient uptake and yield of single cropping late rice[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2014, 20(1): 156-163. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[29] | 鲁艳红, 廖育林, 聂军, 周兴, 谢坚, 杨曾平. 紫云英与尿素或控释尿素配施对双季稻产量及氮钾利用率的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(2): 360-368. |
Lu Y H, Liao Y L, Nie J, Zhou X, Xie J, Yang Z P. Effect of different incorporation of Chinese milk vetch coupled with urea or controlled release urea on yield and nitrogen and potassium nutrient use efficiency in double-cropping rice system[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2017, 23(2): 360-368. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[30] | 王士梅, 朴钟泽, 李培德, 申广勒. 钙增效剂对稻米中钙等矿质元素积累及稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2007(2): 185-188. |
Wang S M, Pu Z Z, Li P D, Shen G L. Effects of Ca potentiators to Ca contents, mineral elements and quality in rice[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2007 (2): 185-188. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[31] | 刘立军, 常二华, 范苗苗, 王志琴, 杨建昌. 结实期钾、钙对水稻根系分泌物与稻米品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2011, 37(4): 661-669. |
Liu L J, Chang E H, Fan M M, Wang Z Q, Yang J C. Effects of potassium and calcium on root exudates and grain quality during grain filling[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2011, 37(4): 661-669. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | YI Xiaoxuan, LIU Weiqi, ZENG Gai, LUO Lihua, XIAO Yinghui. Effect of High Temperature Stress at Grain Filling Stage on Early indica Rice Quality Traits [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(1): 72-80. |
[2] | WU Yuhong, LI Yanhua, WANG Lü, QIN Yuhang, LI Shanshan, HAO Xingshun, ZHANG Qinglu, CUI Yuezhen, XIAO Fei. Improvement of Yield and Quality of Rice by Combining Returning of Green Manure (Astragalus smicus L.) and Rice Straw with Reduced Application of Nitrogen Fertilizer in Southern Shaanxi Province [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(6): 628-641. |
[3] | HUANG Jinwen, LI Rikun, CHEN Zhicheng, ZHANG Bianhong, LEI Han, PAN Ruixin, YANG Mingyu, PAN Meiqing, TANG Lina. Effects of Straw Returning Techniques on Soil Nutrients, Organic Carbon and Microbial Diversity in Tobacco-rice Rotation System [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 415-426. |
[4] | YANG Xiaolong, WANG Biao, WANG Benfu, ZHANG Zhisheng, ZHANG Zuolin, YANG Lantian, CHENG Jianping, LI Yang. Effects of Different Water Management on Yield and Rice Quality of Dry-seeded Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 285-294. |
[5] | WEI Xiaodong, SONG Xuemei, ZHAO Ling, ZHAO Qingyong, CHEN Tao, LU Kai, ZHU Zhen, HUANG Shengdong, WANG Cailin, ZHANG Yadong. Effects of Silicon and Zinc Fertilizer and Their Application Ways on Yield and Grain Quality of Rice Variety Nanjing 46 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 295-306. |
[6] | CHEN Yun, LIU Kun, LI Tingting, LI Siyu, LI Guoming, ZHANG Weiyang, ZHANG Hao, GU Junfei, LIU Lijun, YANG Jianchang. Effects of Alternate Wetting and Moderate Soil Drying Irrigation on Root Traits, Grain Yield and Soil Properties in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2022, 36(3): 269-277. |
[7] | XU Qingshan, HUANG Jing, SUN Aijun, HONG Xiaozhi, ZHU Lianfeng, CAO Xiaochuang, KONG Yali, JIN Qianyu, ZHU Chunquan, ZHANG Junhua. Effects of Low Temperature on the Growth and Development of Rice Plants and the Advance of Regulation Pathways: A Review [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2022, 36(2): 118-130. |
[8] | YANG Chen, ZHENG Chang, YUAN Shen, XU Le, PENG Shaobing. Effect of Fertilizer Management on the Yield and Quality of Different Rice Varieties in Ratoon Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2022, 36(1): 65-76. |
[9] | Yunxia WU, Changchun GUO, Yongjian SUN, Fangyan LIU, Zhiyuan YANG, Yuanyuan SUN, Mingtian MA, Jun MA. Relationship Between Canopy Microclimate at Grain Filling Stage and Rice Quality of Directly Seeded Rice Under Water and Nitrogen Interaction [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2021, 35(3): 269-278. |
[10] | Kailou LIU, Tianfu HAN, Wenjun LI, Xichu YU, Zhihua HU, Huicai YE, Dandan HU, Huijie SONG, Daming LI, Qinghai HUANG. Analysis on the Key Factors of Soil Physicochemical Properties Responsible for Changes in Rice Yield with Chinese Milk Vetch Turned over for Different Years [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2021, 35(3): 291-302. |
[11] | Chunyan WEN, XIONGYunhua, Xiaoyun YAO, Chunlian CHEN, Biaolin HU, Yongping HUANG, Yanshou WU. Effect of Nitrogen Application on Yield, Rice Quality and ProcessingCharacteristics inRice Noodle-specific Varieties [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2020, 34(6): 574-585. |
[12] | Hao WANG, Xiangchen LIU, Qiang ZHANG, Guilong YU, Wendi ZHANG, Jian HUANG, An ZHU, Lijun LIU. Differences in Grain Yield and Quality in Main and Ratoon Rice in Southern Henan Province [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2020, 34(5): 425-434. |
[13] | Guohui HU, Shunqi SONG, Jing XIANG, Defeng ZHU, Huizhe CHEN, Yikai ZHANG, Yaliang WANG, Yicheng XU, Zihao YI, Junke WANG, Yuping ZHANG. Effect of Biodegradable Film Mulching on Growth and Quality of Mechanically Transplanted Rice (Oryza sativa L.) [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2020, 34(2): 159-170. |
[14] | Sha LIAO, Xueming TAN, Muying LI, Kai HU, Xiaohua PAN, Qinghua SHI. Effects of Brassinolide on Physiological Characteristics and Growth of Straw Substrate-cultured Rice Seedlings After Transplanting [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2020, 34(2): 181-190. |
[15] | Xiaolei WANG, Yang LIU, Xiaotang SUN, Linjuan OUYANG, Jinlong PAN, Xiaosong PENG, Xiaorong CHEN, Xiaopeng HE, Junru FU, Jianmin BIAN, Lifang HU, Jie XU, Haohua HE, Changlan ZHU. Identification and Stability Analysis of QTL for Grain Quality Traits Under Multiple Environments in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2020, 34(1): 17-27. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||