Chinese Journal OF Rice Science ›› 2015, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 282-290.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001G7216.2015.03.007
• ResearchPaper • Previous Articles Next Articles
Peng-gang PEI, Jun-hua ZHANG, Lian-feng ZHU, Zhi-hua HU, Qian-yu JIN*()
Received:
2014-07-27
Revised:
2014-12-02
Online:
2015-05-10
Published:
2015-05-10
Contact:
Qian-yu JIN
通讯作者:
金千瑜
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Peng-gang PEI, Jun-hua ZHANG, Lian-feng ZHU, Zhi-hua HU, Qian-yu JIN. Effects of Straw Returning Coupled with N Application on Rice Photosynthetic Characteristics, Nitrogen Uptake and Grain Yield Formation[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2015, 29(3): 282-290.
裴鹏刚, 张均华, 朱练峰, 胡志华, 金千瑜. 秸秆还田耦合施氮水平对水稻光合特性、氮素吸收及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2015, 29(3): 282-290.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.ricesci.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1001G7216.2015.03.007
Fig. 1. Rice tillering dynamics at various N application levels with straw returning. (S0,S4,S6,S8 indicate four staw returning levels,0,4000,6000 and 8000 kg/hm2, resectively. N0,N90,N180,N270 indicate four N application levels,0,90,180,270kg/hm2,respectively. The same as below. )
处理 Treatments | 移栽-分蘖盛期 TS-MTS /(g·m-2) | 分蘖盛期-齐穗期 MTS-FHS /(g·m-2) | 齐穗期-完熟期 FHS-FMS /(g·m-2) | 干物质总量 Total dry matter auumlation /(g·m-2) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
施氮水平 Nitrogen application level | 秸秆还田 Straw returning | ||||
N0 | S0 | 284.80±4.59 a | 493.08±42.65 b | 483.30±5.32 b | 1262.15±35.23 b |
S4 | 218.21±18.41 c | 584.52±31.05 a | 515.74±36.75 a | 1319.45±147.78 a | |
S6 | 246.57±16.98 b | 581.61±39.15 a | 522.35±1.53 a | 1351.50±113.02 a | |
S8 | 238.09±2.54 b | 578.41±40.10 a | 532.25±33.67 a | 1349.71±95.56 a | |
N90 | S0 | 354.71±14.02 a | 631.64±26.11 d | 587.73±38.08 a | 1575.04±137.51 a |
S4 | 318.07±11.73 b | 728.92±42.98 b | 548.66±33.47 b | 1596.62±49.50 a | |
S6 | 291.15±16.94 c | 777.51±44.12 a | 522.78±25.20 c | 1592.41±99.96 a | |
S8 | 294.18±25.36 c | 672.06±42.80 c | 509.08±24.53 c | 1476.28±64.89 b | |
N180 | S0 | 413.74±14.58 a | 653.30±41.18 c | 483.78±29.72 d | 1551.79±59.12 b |
S4 | 359.73±18.04 b | 641.71±31.07 c | 690.87±26.70 a | 1693.27±41.57 a | |
S6 | 362.21±12.91 b | 774.33±30.35 a | 568.80±25.56 c | 1706.31±94.42 a | |
S8 | 356.21±4.71 b | 731.58±20.12 b | 623.27±31.59 b | 1712.02±51.44 a | |
N270 | S0 | 415.01±16.65 a | 666.66±34.34 d | 475.00±34.92 a | 1557.64±116.53 b |
S4 | 386.76±11.32 b | 745.48±13.26 c | 443.07±15.27 c | 1576.28±44.17 b | |
S6 | 375.54±10.10 b | 777.13±16.21 a | 457.87±26.66 b | 1611.51±70.35 a | |
S8 | 351.42±12.29 b | 752.81±32.98 b | 455.30±14.90 b | 1560.50±82.41 b |
Table 1 Effects of straw returning coupled with N application rates on rice aboveground dry matter accumulations.
处理 Treatments | 移栽-分蘖盛期 TS-MTS /(g·m-2) | 分蘖盛期-齐穗期 MTS-FHS /(g·m-2) | 齐穗期-完熟期 FHS-FMS /(g·m-2) | 干物质总量 Total dry matter auumlation /(g·m-2) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
施氮水平 Nitrogen application level | 秸秆还田 Straw returning | ||||
N0 | S0 | 284.80±4.59 a | 493.08±42.65 b | 483.30±5.32 b | 1262.15±35.23 b |
S4 | 218.21±18.41 c | 584.52±31.05 a | 515.74±36.75 a | 1319.45±147.78 a | |
S6 | 246.57±16.98 b | 581.61±39.15 a | 522.35±1.53 a | 1351.50±113.02 a | |
S8 | 238.09±2.54 b | 578.41±40.10 a | 532.25±33.67 a | 1349.71±95.56 a | |
N90 | S0 | 354.71±14.02 a | 631.64±26.11 d | 587.73±38.08 a | 1575.04±137.51 a |
S4 | 318.07±11.73 b | 728.92±42.98 b | 548.66±33.47 b | 1596.62±49.50 a | |
S6 | 291.15±16.94 c | 777.51±44.12 a | 522.78±25.20 c | 1592.41±99.96 a | |
S8 | 294.18±25.36 c | 672.06±42.80 c | 509.08±24.53 c | 1476.28±64.89 b | |
N180 | S0 | 413.74±14.58 a | 653.30±41.18 c | 483.78±29.72 d | 1551.79±59.12 b |
S4 | 359.73±18.04 b | 641.71±31.07 c | 690.87±26.70 a | 1693.27±41.57 a | |
S6 | 362.21±12.91 b | 774.33±30.35 a | 568.80±25.56 c | 1706.31±94.42 a | |
S8 | 356.21±4.71 b | 731.58±20.12 b | 623.27±31.59 b | 1712.02±51.44 a | |
N270 | S0 | 415.01±16.65 a | 666.66±34.34 d | 475.00±34.92 a | 1557.64±116.53 b |
S4 | 386.76±11.32 b | 745.48±13.26 c | 443.07±15.27 c | 1576.28±44.17 b | |
S6 | 375.54±10.10 b | 777.13±16.21 a | 457.87±26.66 b | 1611.51±70.35 a | |
S8 | 351.42±12.29 b | 752.81±32.98 b | 455.30±14.90 b | 1560.50±82.41 b |
处理 Treatment | 每1 m2有效穗数 Effective panicle number per m2 | 每穗总粒数 Grain number per panicle | 每穗实粒数 Filled grain number per panicle | 结实率 seed setting rate /% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight /g | 稻谷产量 Rice grain yield /(t·hm-2) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
施氮量 Nitrogen level | 秸秆还田 Straw returning | ||||||
N0 | S0 | 204.84±3.53 a | 182.20±5.73 a | 155.56±4.32 a | 85.48±3.13 a | 23.30±0.16 a | 8.55±0.17 a |
S4 | 206.86±4.82 a | 163.82±6.74 b | 148.13±8.23 a | 83.26±1.70 a | 23.20±0.06 a | 8.77±0.62 a | |
S6 | 212.06±4.82 a | 172.13±4.31 ab | 148.00±7.33 a | 85.95±2.11 a | 23.35±0.39 a | 8.74±0.35 a | |
S8 | 204.55±2.87 a | 171.01±2.31 ab | 144.85±7.50 a | 84.68±3.24 a | 23.76±0.36 a | 8.93±0.60 a | |
N90 | S0 | 219.56±8.16 b | 177.14±5.77 a | 149.18±9.31 a | 84.58±3.62 a | 24.28±0.10 a | 9.27±0.21 a |
S4 | 230.23±8.74 a | 177.63±6.73 a | 148.67±3.96 a | 83.71±0.95 a | 23.89±0.23 a | 9.37±0.24 a | |
S6 | 222.44±8.78 b | 177.19±9.08 a | 151.46±7.14 a | 85.49±0.35 a | 24.32±0.32 a | 9.48±0.13 a | |
S8 | 213.79±8.78 b | 172.06±6.73 a | 133.87±7.25 a | 77.10±3.88 a | 23.36±0.33 a | 9.32±0.40 a | |
N180 | S0 | 229.65±9.96 b | 155.41±4.43 b | 132.32±9.25 b | 85.09±3.53 a | 24.28±0.30 a | 9.76±0.08 c |
S4 | 233.41±9.74 b | 183.09±4.47 a | 162.17±3.09 ab | 88.58±0.47 a | 24.20±0.12 a | 10.21±0.16 b | |
S6 | 244.08±3.77 a | 188.22±3.95 a | 168.88±8.54 a | 89.67±4.31 a | 24.36±0.36 a | 10.56±0.15 a | |
S8 | 226.48±4.23 b | 194.40±3.22 a | 166.82±9.06 a | 85.76±1.41 a | 23.68±0.30 a | 10.33±0.07 b | |
N270 | S0 | 248.12±2.50 b | 170.69±3.31 a | 155.26±1.13 a | 90.97±1.10 a | 24.26±0.26 a | 9.54±0.38 b |
S4 | 261.68±6.72 a | 181.55±5.24 a | 161.18±9.48 a | 88.64±3.29 a | 24.46±0.41 a | 9.64±0.05 b | |
S6 | 255.62±5.16 ab | 178.88±7.04 a | 160.98±1.96 a | 90.04±2.45 a | 24.75±0.34 a | 10.06±0.26 a | |
S8 | 234.85±4.44 c | 172.75±4.30 a | 157.07±2.83 a | 90.96±2.26 a | 24.80±0.31 a | 9.90±0.23 a |
Table 2 Effects of straw returning coulpled with N application rate on rice grain yield and its components.
处理 Treatment | 每1 m2有效穗数 Effective panicle number per m2 | 每穗总粒数 Grain number per panicle | 每穗实粒数 Filled grain number per panicle | 结实率 seed setting rate /% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight /g | 稻谷产量 Rice grain yield /(t·hm-2) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
施氮量 Nitrogen level | 秸秆还田 Straw returning | ||||||
N0 | S0 | 204.84±3.53 a | 182.20±5.73 a | 155.56±4.32 a | 85.48±3.13 a | 23.30±0.16 a | 8.55±0.17 a |
S4 | 206.86±4.82 a | 163.82±6.74 b | 148.13±8.23 a | 83.26±1.70 a | 23.20±0.06 a | 8.77±0.62 a | |
S6 | 212.06±4.82 a | 172.13±4.31 ab | 148.00±7.33 a | 85.95±2.11 a | 23.35±0.39 a | 8.74±0.35 a | |
S8 | 204.55±2.87 a | 171.01±2.31 ab | 144.85±7.50 a | 84.68±3.24 a | 23.76±0.36 a | 8.93±0.60 a | |
N90 | S0 | 219.56±8.16 b | 177.14±5.77 a | 149.18±9.31 a | 84.58±3.62 a | 24.28±0.10 a | 9.27±0.21 a |
S4 | 230.23±8.74 a | 177.63±6.73 a | 148.67±3.96 a | 83.71±0.95 a | 23.89±0.23 a | 9.37±0.24 a | |
S6 | 222.44±8.78 b | 177.19±9.08 a | 151.46±7.14 a | 85.49±0.35 a | 24.32±0.32 a | 9.48±0.13 a | |
S8 | 213.79±8.78 b | 172.06±6.73 a | 133.87±7.25 a | 77.10±3.88 a | 23.36±0.33 a | 9.32±0.40 a | |
N180 | S0 | 229.65±9.96 b | 155.41±4.43 b | 132.32±9.25 b | 85.09±3.53 a | 24.28±0.30 a | 9.76±0.08 c |
S4 | 233.41±9.74 b | 183.09±4.47 a | 162.17±3.09 ab | 88.58±0.47 a | 24.20±0.12 a | 10.21±0.16 b | |
S6 | 244.08±3.77 a | 188.22±3.95 a | 168.88±8.54 a | 89.67±4.31 a | 24.36±0.36 a | 10.56±0.15 a | |
S8 | 226.48±4.23 b | 194.40±3.22 a | 166.82±9.06 a | 85.76±1.41 a | 23.68±0.30 a | 10.33±0.07 b | |
N270 | S0 | 248.12±2.50 b | 170.69±3.31 a | 155.26±1.13 a | 90.97±1.10 a | 24.26±0.26 a | 9.54±0.38 b |
S4 | 261.68±6.72 a | 181.55±5.24 a | 161.18±9.48 a | 88.64±3.29 a | 24.46±0.41 a | 9.64±0.05 b | |
S6 | 255.62±5.16 ab | 178.88±7.04 a | 160.98±1.96 a | 90.04±2.45 a | 24.75±0.34 a | 10.06±0.26 a | |
S8 | 234.85±4.44 c | 172.75±4.30 a | 157.07±2.83 a | 90.96±2.26 a | 24.80±0.31 a | 9.90±0.23 a |
[1] | 安成立,杜建,岳秀琴,等.作物秸秆高效综合利用途径探析. 中国资源综合利用,2004(1): 25-27. |
[2] | 高利伟,马林,张卫峰,等.中国作物秸秆养分资源数量估算及其利用状况. 农业工程学报,2009,25(7): 173-179. |
[3] | Lal R.World crop residues production and implications of its use as a biofuel.Environ Int,2005,31(4): 575-584. |
[4] | 陈中玉,张祖立,白小虎.农作物秸秆的综合开发利用. 农机化研究,2007(5): 194-196. |
[5] | 高祥照,马文奇,马常宝,等.中国作物秸秆资源利用现状分析. 华中农业大学学报, 2002,21(3): 242-247. |
[6] | 徐玉宏. 我国秸秆焚烧污染与防治对策. 环境与可持续发展,2007(3): 21-24. |
[7] | Tanaka H,Kyaw K M,Toyota K,et al.Influence of application of rice straw, farmyard manure, and municipal biowastes on nitrogen fixation, soil microbial biomass N, and mineral N in a model paddy microcosm.Biol Fert Soils,2006,42(6): 501-505. |
[8] | 肖小平,汤海涛,纪雄辉.稻草还田模式对稻田土壤速效氮、钾含量及晚稻生长的影响. 作物学报,2008,34(8): 1464-1469. |
[9] | 朱强根,朱安宁,张佳宝,等.保护性耕作下土壤动物群落及其与土壤肥力的关系.农业工程学报,2010,26(2): 70-76. |
[10] | Zhang B,Pang C,Qin J,et al.Rice straw incorporation in winter with fertilizer-N application improves soil fertility and reduces global warming potential from a double rice paddy field.Biol Fert Soils,2013,49(8): 1039-1052. |
[11] | 俞映倞,薛利红,杨林章.不同氮肥管理模式对太湖流域稻田土壤氮素渗漏的影响. 土壤学报,2011,48(5): 988-995. |
[12] | 王秀斌,徐新朋,孙刚,等.氮肥用量对双季稻产量和氮肥利用率的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报,2013,19(6): 1279-1286. |
[13] | 高菊生,曹卫东,李冬初,等.长期双季稻绿肥轮作对水稻产量及稻田土壤有机质的影响. 生态学报,2011,31(16): 4542-4548. |
[14] | 叶文培,谢小立,王凯荣,等.不同时期秸秆还田对水稻生长发育及产量的影响. 中国水稻科学,2008,22(1): 65-70. |
[15] | 徐国伟,吴长付,刘辉,等.麦秸还田及氮肥管理技术对水稻产量的影响. 作物学报, 2007,33(2): 284-291. |
[16] | 马义虎,顾道健,刘立军,等.玉米秸秆源有机肥对水稻产量与温室气体排放的影响. 中国水稻科学,2013,27(5): 520-528. |
[17] | Soon Y K, Lupwayi N Z.Straw management in a cold semi-arid region: Impact on soil quality and crop productivity.Field Crops Res,2012,139: 39-46. |
[18] | 徐国伟,吴长付,刘辉,等.麦秸还田及氮肥管理技术对水稻产量的影响. 作物学报,2007,33(2): 284-291. |
[19] | 顾志权,李庆康,赵强基.苏南稻麦二熟区秸秆全量机械还田技术. 土壤肥料, 2001(5): 23-26. |
[20] | 马宗国,卢绪奎,万丽,等.小麦秸秆还田对水稻生长及土壤肥力的影响. 作物杂志,2003(5): 37-38. |
[21] | 王卫,谢小立,谢永宏,等.不同施肥制度对双季稻氮吸收、净光合速率及产量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报,2010,16(3): 752-757. |
[22] | 赵锋,程建平,张国忠,等.氮肥运筹和秸秆还田对直播稻氮素利用和产量的影响. 湖北农业科学,2011,50(18): 3702-3704. |
[23] | 赵步洪,王朋,张洪熙,等.两系杂交稻扬两优6号源库特征与结实特性的分析. 中国水稻科学, 2006,20(1): 65-72. |
[24] | 史鸿儒,张文忠,解文孝,等.不同氮肥施用模式下北方粳型超级稻物质生产特性分析. 作物学报,2008,34(11): 1985-1993. |
[25] | 胡钧铭,江立庚,莫润秀,等.优质籼稻桂华占、八桂香花后干物质积累与转运及灌浆的动态特征. 中国水稻科学,2009,23(6): 628-632. |
[26] | 李志勇,陈建军,陈明灿.不同水肥条件下冬小麦的干物质积累、产量及水氮利用效率. 麦类作物学报,2005,25(5): 80-83. |
[27] | 胡茂辉,张海清.不同种植模式下秸秆还田对水稻生长发育和产量的影响. 江西农业学报, 2012,24(3): 61-63. |
[28] | 汪军,王德建,张刚.太湖地区稻麦轮作体系下秸秆还田配施氮肥对水稻产量及经济效益的影响. 中国生态农业学报,2011,19(2): 265-270. |
[29] | 徐国伟,谈桂露,王志琴,等.秸秆还田与实地氮肥管理对直播水稻产量、品质及氮肥利用的影响.中国农业科学,2009,42(8): 2736-2746. |
[30] | 张媛媛,李建林,王春宏,等.氮素和生物腐解剂调控下稻草还田对水稻氮素积累及产量的影响. 土壤通报,2012,43(2): 435-438. |
[31] | 许有尊. 秸秆还田及有机肥对水稻生长和氮肥利用率影响的研究. 武汉:华中农业大学,2009. |
[32] | 葛立立,马义虎,卞金龙,等.玉米秸秆还田与实地氮肥管理对水稻产量与米质的影响. 中国水稻科学,2013,27(2): 153-160. |
[33] | 袁玲,张宣,杨静,等.不同栽培方式和秸秆还田对水稻产量和营养品质的影响. 作物学报, 2013,39(2): 350-359. |
[34] | 徐国伟,谈桂露,王志琴,等.秸秆还田与实地氮肥管理对直播水稻产量、品质及氮肥利用的影响. 中国农业科学,2009,42(8): 2736-2746. |
[35] | 余延丰,熊桂云,张继铭,等.秸秆还田对作物产量和土壤肥力的影响. 湖北农业科学, 2008,47(2): 169-171. |
[36] | 张洪熙,赵步洪,杜永林,等.小麦秸秆还田条件下轻简栽培水稻的生长特性. 中国水稻科学, 2008,22(6): 603-609. |
[37] | 吴建富,曾研华,潘晓华,等.稻草还田方式对双季水稻产量和土壤碳库管理指数的影响. 应用生态学报,2013,24(6): 1572-1578. |
[1] | GUO Zhan, ZHANG Yunbo. Research Progress in Physiological,Biochemical Responses of Rice to Drought Stress and Its Molecular Regulation [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 335-349. |
[2] | WEI Huanhe, MA Weiyi, ZUO Boyuan, WANG Lulu, ZHU Wang, GENG Xiaoyu, ZHANG Xiang, MENG Tianyao, CHEN Yinglong, GAO Pinglei, XU Ke, HUO Zhongyang, DAI Qigen. Research Progress in the Effect of Salinity, Drought, and Their Combined Stresses on Rice Yield and Quality Formation [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 350-363. |
[3] | XU Danjie, LIN Qiaoxia, LI Zhengkang, ZHUANG Xiaoqian, LING Yu, LAI Meiling, CHEN Xiaoting, LU Guodong. OsOPR10 Positively Regulates Rice Blast and Bacterial Blight Resistance [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 364-374. |
[4] | CHEN Mingliang, ZENG Xihua, SHEN Yumin, LUO Shiyou, HU Lanxiang, XIONG Wentao, XIONG Huanjin, WU Xiaoyan, XIAO Yeqing. Typing of Inter-subspecific Fertility Loci and Fertility Locus Pattern of indica-japonica Hybrid Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 386-396. |
[5] | DING Zhengquan, PAN Yueyun, SHI Yang, HUANG Haixiang. Comprehensive Evaluation and Comparative Analysis of Jiahe Series Long-Grain japonica Rice with High Eating Quality Based on Gene Chip Technology [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 397-408. |
[6] | HOU Xiaoqin, WANG Ying, YU Bei, FU Weimeng, FENG Baohua, SHEN Yichao, XIE Hangjun, WANG Huanran, XU Yongqiang, WU Zhihai, WANG Jianjun, TAO Longxing, FU Guanfu. Mechanisms Behind the Role of Potassium Fulvic Acid in Enhancing Salt Tolerance in Rice Seedlings [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 409-421. |
[7] | LÜ Zhou, YI Binghuai, CHEN Pingping, ZHOU Wenxin, TANG Wenbang, YI Zhenxie. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate and Transplanting Density on Yield Formation of Small Seed Hybrid Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 422-436. |
[8] | HU Jijie, HU Zhihua, ZHANG Junhua, CAO Xiaochuang, JIN Qianyu, ZHANG Zhiyuan, ZHU Lianfeng. Effects of Rhizosphere Saturated Dissolved Oxygen on Photosynthetic and Growth Characteristics of Rice at Tillering Stage [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 437-446. |
[9] | WU Yue, LIANG Chengwei, ZHAO Chenfei, SUN Jian, MA Dianrong. Occurrence of Weedy Rice Disaster and Ecotype Evolution in Direct-Seeded Rice Fields [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 447-455. |
[10] | LIU Fuxiang, ZHEN Haoyang, PENG Huan, ZHENG Liuchun, PENG Deliang, WEN Yanhua. Investigation and Species Identification of Cyst Nematode Disease on Rice in Guangdong Province [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 456-461. |
[11] | CHEN Haotian, QIN Yuan, ZHONG Xiaohan, LIN Chenyu, QIN Jinghang, YANG Jianchang, ZHANG Weiyang. Research Progress on the Relationship Between Rice Root, Soil Properties and Methane Emissions in Paddy Fields [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 233-245. |
[12] | MIAO Jun, RAN Jinhui, XU Mengbin, BO Liubing, WANG Ping, LIANG Guohua, ZHOU Yong. Overexpression of RGG2, a Heterotrimeric G Protein γ Subunit-Encoding Gene, Improves Drought Tolerance in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 246-255. |
[13] | YIN Xiaoxiao, ZHANG Zhihan, YAN Xiulian, LIAO Rong, YANG Sijia, Beenish HASSAN, GUO Daiming, FAN Jing, ZHAO Zhixue, WANG Wenming. Signal Peptide Validation and Expression Analysis of Multiple Effectors from Ustilaginoidea virens [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 256-265. |
[14] | ZHU Yujing, GUI Jinxin, GONG Chengyun, LUO Xinyang, SHI Jubin, ZHANG Haiqing, HE Jiwai. QTL Mapping for Tiller Angle in Rice by Genome-wide Association Analysis [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 266-276. |
[15] | WEI Qianqian, WANG Yulei, KONG Haimin, XU Qingshan, YAN Yulian, PAN Lin, CHI Chunxin, KONG Yali, TIAN Wenhao, ZHU Lianfeng, CAO Xiaochuang, ZHANG Junhua, ZHU Chunqun. Mechanism of Hydrogen Sulfide, a Signaling Molecule Involved in Reducing the Inhibitory Effect of Aluminum Toxicity on Rice Growth Together with Sulfur Fertilizer [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 290-302. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||