Chinese Journal OF Rice Science ›› 2015, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 273-281.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001G7216.2015.03.006
• ResearchPaper • Previous Articles Next Articles
Jin-long GONG1,2, Zhi-peng XING1, Ya-jie HU1, Hong-cheng ZHANG1,*(), Qi-gen DAI1, Zhong-yang HUO1, Ke XU1, Hai-yan WEI1, Hui GAO1
Received:
2014-02-14
Revised:
2014-06-04
Online:
2015-05-10
Published:
2015-05-10
Contact:
Hong-cheng ZHANG
龚金龙1,2, 邢志鹏1, 胡雅杰1, 张洪程1,*(), 戴其根1, 霍中洋1, 许轲1, 魏海燕1, 高辉1
通讯作者:
张洪程
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Jin-long GONG, Zhi-peng XING, Ya-jie HU, Hong-cheng ZHANG, Qi-gen DAI, Zhong-yang HUO, Ke XU, Hai-yan WEI, Hui GAO. Difference in Lodging Resistance of Culm Between indica and japonica Super Rice[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2015, 29(3): 273-281.
龚金龙, 邢志鹏, 胡雅杰, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 高辉. 籼、粳超级稻茎秆抗倒支撑特征的差异研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2015, 29(3): 273-281.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.ricesci.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1001G7216.2015.03.006
年份 Year | 参数 Parameter | 镇稻11号 Zhendao 11 | 武运粳24号 Wuyunjing 24 | 扬两优6号 Yangliangyou 6 | 两优培九 Liangyoupeijiu |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2011 | 实收产量Grain yield/(t·hm-2) | 10.62 aAB | 11.05 aA | 9.42 bC | 9.79 bBC |
表观倒伏率 Apparent lodging rate/% | - | - | 11.58 aA | 11.94 aA | |
2012 | 实收产量 Grain yield/(t·hm-2) | 10.94 aAB | 11.31 aA | 9.86 bC | 10.05 bBC |
表观倒伏率 Apparent lodging rate/% | - | - | 12.35 aA | 13.05 aA |
Table 1 Difference in grain yield and apparent lodging rate in the field between indica and japonica super rice.
年份 Year | 参数 Parameter | 镇稻11号 Zhendao 11 | 武运粳24号 Wuyunjing 24 | 扬两优6号 Yangliangyou 6 | 两优培九 Liangyoupeijiu |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2011 | 实收产量Grain yield/(t·hm-2) | 10.62 aAB | 11.05 aA | 9.42 bC | 9.79 bBC |
表观倒伏率 Apparent lodging rate/% | - | - | 11.58 aA | 11.94 aA | |
2012 | 实收产量 Grain yield/(t·hm-2) | 10.94 aAB | 11.31 aA | 9.86 bC | 10.05 bBC |
表观倒伏率 Apparent lodging rate/% | - | - | 12.35 aA | 13.05 aA |
节间与参数 Internodes and parameters | 镇稻11号 Zhendao 11 | 武运粳24号 Wuyunjing 24 | 扬两优6号 Yangliangyou 6 | 两优培九 Liangyoupeijiu |
---|---|---|---|---|
基部第1节间 The 1st internode from the bottom | ||||
弯曲力矩Breaking resistance/(cm·g) | 1846.11 cC | 1689.67 dC | 2685.40 bB | 2904.33 aA |
抗折力 Bending moment/g | 4815.04 aA | 4674.93 bB | 4314.04 dD | 4478.74 cC |
倒伏指数 Lodging index/(cm g·g-1) | 38.34 bB | 36.14 bB | 62.25 aA | 64.85 aA |
基部第2节间 The 2nd internode from the bottom | ||||
弯曲力矩 Breaking resistance/(cm·g) | 1724.29 cC | 1584.41 dC | 2459.64 bB | 2646.91 aA |
抗折力 Bending moment/g | 2097.34 aA | 2038.24 bA | 1734.91 dC | 1887.24 cB |
倒伏指数 Lodging index/(cm g ·g-1) | 82.21 bB | 77.73 cB | 141.77 aA | 140.25 aA |
基部第3节间 3rd internode from the bottom | ||||
弯曲力矩Breaking resistance/(cm·g) | 1447.79 cB | 1328.91 dB | 2064.43 bA | 2219.12 aA |
抗折力 Bending moment/g | 810.46 aA | 767.56 bA | 615.59 cB | 638.80 cB |
倒伏指数 Lodging index/(cm g·g-1) | 178.64 cC | 173.13 dC | 335.36 bB | 347.39 aA |
基部第4节间 The 4th internode from the bottom | ||||
弯曲力矩 Breaking resistance/(cm·g) | 1061.15 cB | 966.30 dB | 1537.89 bA | 1658.90 aA |
抗折力 Bending moment/g | 454.70 aA | 417.30 aA | 296.49 bB | 305.55 bB |
倒伏指数 Lodging index/(cm g·g-1) | 233.38 cC | 231.56 cC | 518.70 bB | 542.92 aA |
基部0~20 0-20 cm from the bottom | ||||
抗折力 Bending moment/g | 852.34 aA | 791.00 bA | 502.73 cB | 515.71 cB |
倒伏指数 Lodging index/(cm g ·g-1) | 216.59 cC | 213.61 cC | 534.17 bB | 563.18 aA |
Table 2 Difference in breaking resistance, bending moment and lodging index of each basal internode between indica and japonica super rice.
节间与参数 Internodes and parameters | 镇稻11号 Zhendao 11 | 武运粳24号 Wuyunjing 24 | 扬两优6号 Yangliangyou 6 | 两优培九 Liangyoupeijiu |
---|---|---|---|---|
基部第1节间 The 1st internode from the bottom | ||||
弯曲力矩Breaking resistance/(cm·g) | 1846.11 cC | 1689.67 dC | 2685.40 bB | 2904.33 aA |
抗折力 Bending moment/g | 4815.04 aA | 4674.93 bB | 4314.04 dD | 4478.74 cC |
倒伏指数 Lodging index/(cm g·g-1) | 38.34 bB | 36.14 bB | 62.25 aA | 64.85 aA |
基部第2节间 The 2nd internode from the bottom | ||||
弯曲力矩 Breaking resistance/(cm·g) | 1724.29 cC | 1584.41 dC | 2459.64 bB | 2646.91 aA |
抗折力 Bending moment/g | 2097.34 aA | 2038.24 bA | 1734.91 dC | 1887.24 cB |
倒伏指数 Lodging index/(cm g ·g-1) | 82.21 bB | 77.73 cB | 141.77 aA | 140.25 aA |
基部第3节间 3rd internode from the bottom | ||||
弯曲力矩Breaking resistance/(cm·g) | 1447.79 cB | 1328.91 dB | 2064.43 bA | 2219.12 aA |
抗折力 Bending moment/g | 810.46 aA | 767.56 bA | 615.59 cB | 638.80 cB |
倒伏指数 Lodging index/(cm g·g-1) | 178.64 cC | 173.13 dC | 335.36 bB | 347.39 aA |
基部第4节间 The 4th internode from the bottom | ||||
弯曲力矩 Breaking resistance/(cm·g) | 1061.15 cB | 966.30 dB | 1537.89 bA | 1658.90 aA |
抗折力 Bending moment/g | 454.70 aA | 417.30 aA | 296.49 bB | 305.55 bB |
倒伏指数 Lodging index/(cm g·g-1) | 233.38 cC | 231.56 cC | 518.70 bB | 542.92 aA |
基部0~20 0-20 cm from the bottom | ||||
抗折力 Bending moment/g | 852.34 aA | 791.00 bA | 502.73 cB | 515.71 cB |
倒伏指数 Lodging index/(cm g ·g-1) | 216.59 cC | 213.61 cC | 534.17 bB | 563.18 aA |
品种 Cultivar | 株高 Plant height /cm | 穗下节间长/秆长 Ratio of neck internode length to stalk length/% | 基部节间外径 Outer diameter of basal internode/cm | 秆型指数 Stalk type index | 重心高 Height of gravity center/cm | 相对重心高度 Ratio of gravity center height to plant height/% | 单穗质量 Single panicle weight/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
镇稻11号Zhendao 11 | 104.3 bB | 40.24 aA | 0.806 bBC | 0.91 bA | 48.4 bB | 46.43 cB | 3.33 dD |
武运粳24号Wuyunjing 24 | 102.2 bB | 40.33 aA | 0.776 bC | 0.90 bA | 47.8 bB | 46.82 cB | 3.57 cC |
扬两优6号Yangliangyou 6 | 120.6 aA | 38.58 bB | 0.967 aAB | 1.00 abA | 57.3 aA | 47.50 bA | 3.85 bB |
两优培九Liangyoupeijiu | 119.5 aA | 38.39 bB | 1.039 aA | 1.09 aA | 58.2 aA | 48.67 aA | 4.29 aA |
Table 3 Difference in the main agronomic traits between indica and japonica super rice.
品种 Cultivar | 株高 Plant height /cm | 穗下节间长/秆长 Ratio of neck internode length to stalk length/% | 基部节间外径 Outer diameter of basal internode/cm | 秆型指数 Stalk type index | 重心高 Height of gravity center/cm | 相对重心高度 Ratio of gravity center height to plant height/% | 单穗质量 Single panicle weight/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
镇稻11号Zhendao 11 | 104.3 bB | 40.24 aA | 0.806 bBC | 0.91 bA | 48.4 bB | 46.43 cB | 3.33 dD |
武运粳24号Wuyunjing 24 | 102.2 bB | 40.33 aA | 0.776 bC | 0.90 bA | 47.8 bB | 46.82 cB | 3.57 cC |
扬两优6号Yangliangyou 6 | 120.6 aA | 38.58 bB | 0.967 aAB | 1.00 abA | 57.3 aA | 47.50 bA | 3.85 bB |
两优培九Liangyoupeijiu | 119.5 aA | 38.39 bB | 1.039 aA | 1.09 aA | 58.2 aA | 48.67 aA | 4.29 aA |
项目 Items | 基部节间 Basal internodes | 镇稻11号 Zhendao 11 | 武运粳24号 Wuyunjing 24 | 扬两优6号 Yangliangyou 6 | 两优培九 Liangyoupeijiu |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
茎秆粗度 Culm diameter/cm | N1 | 0.646 bB | 0.626 bB | 0.794 aAB | 0.863 aA |
N2 | 0.570 bA | 0.552 bA | 0.690 aA | 0.733 aA | |
N3 | 0.445 bA | 0.431 bA | 0.582 aA | 0.617 aA | |
N4 | 0.431 bA | 0.420 bA | 0.553 aA | 0.577 aA | |
N5 | 0.393 bcA | 0.384 cA | 0.486 abA | 0.505 aA | |
N6 | 0.243 aA | 0.238 aA | 0.306 aA | 0.315 aA | |
茎壁厚度 Culm wall thickness/mm | N1 | 1.17 aA | 1.16 aA | 1.17 aA | 1.19 aA |
N2 | 1.05 aA | 1.04 aA | 1.05 aA | 1.06 aA | |
N3 | 0.94 aA | 0.93 aA | 0.95 aA | 0.96 aA | |
N4 | 0.85 aA | 0.85 aA | 0.86 aA | 0.88 aA | |
N5 | 0.78 aA | 0.77 aA | 0.79 aA | 0.79 aA | |
N6 | 0.74 aA | 0.73 aA | 0.77 aA | 0.78 aA |
Table 4 Difference in culm diameter and culm wall thickness between indica and japonica super rice.
项目 Items | 基部节间 Basal internodes | 镇稻11号 Zhendao 11 | 武运粳24号 Wuyunjing 24 | 扬两优6号 Yangliangyou 6 | 两优培九 Liangyoupeijiu |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
茎秆粗度 Culm diameter/cm | N1 | 0.646 bB | 0.626 bB | 0.794 aAB | 0.863 aA |
N2 | 0.570 bA | 0.552 bA | 0.690 aA | 0.733 aA | |
N3 | 0.445 bA | 0.431 bA | 0.582 aA | 0.617 aA | |
N4 | 0.431 bA | 0.420 bA | 0.553 aA | 0.577 aA | |
N5 | 0.393 bcA | 0.384 cA | 0.486 abA | 0.505 aA | |
N6 | 0.243 aA | 0.238 aA | 0.306 aA | 0.315 aA | |
茎壁厚度 Culm wall thickness/mm | N1 | 1.17 aA | 1.16 aA | 1.17 aA | 1.19 aA |
N2 | 1.05 aA | 1.04 aA | 1.05 aA | 1.06 aA | |
N3 | 0.94 aA | 0.93 aA | 0.95 aA | 0.96 aA | |
N4 | 0.85 aA | 0.85 aA | 0.86 aA | 0.88 aA | |
N5 | 0.78 aA | 0.77 aA | 0.79 aA | 0.79 aA | |
N6 | 0.74 aA | 0.73 aA | 0.77 aA | 0.78 aA |
Fig. 1. Difference in length of each internode and panicle between indica and japonica super rice.( N1-N6 refer to the 1st-6th inter nodes from the bottom.The same as below.)
茎秆性状 Characters of culm | 基部节间 Basal internode | 镇稻11号 Zhendao 11 | 武运粳24号 Wuyunjing 24 | 扬两优6号 Yangliangyou 6 | 两优培九 Liangyoupeijiu |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
茎秆干质量 | N1 | 0.047 cB | 0.043 cB | 0.072 bA | 0.083 aA |
Dry weight of culm /(g·stem-1) | N2 | 0.115 bcA | 0.111 cA | 0.121 abA | 0.127 aA |
N3 | 0.144 bB | 0.138 bB | 0.164 aA | 0.169 aA | |
N4 | 0.165 bB | 0.156 bB | 0.189 aA | 0.191 aA | |
N5 | 0.140 bB | 0.135 bB | 0.171 aA | 0.177 aA | |
N6 | 0.132 bB | 0.129 bB | 0.165 aA | 0.169 aA | |
叶鞘干质量 | N1 | 0.123 bB | 0.128 bB | 0.130 bB | 0.164 aA |
Dry weight of leaf sheath /(g· stem-1) | N2 | 0.137 bB | 0.141 bB | 0.142 bB | 0.176 aA |
N3 | 0.141 bB | 0.147 bB | 0.144 bB | 0.181 aA | |
N4 | 0.140 bB | 0.149 bB | 0.140 bB | 0.178 aA | |
N5 | 0.139 bB | 0.147 bB | 0.140 bB | 0.175 aA | |
N6 | 0.138 bB | 0.145 bB | 0.135 bB | 0.173 aA | |
单位节间茎秆干质量 | N1 | 28.570 bB | 28.277 bB | 36.746 aA | 37.597 aA |
Dry weight per unit internode/(mg· cm-1) | N2 | 23.132 abA | 22.985 abA | 22.336 bA | 23.335 aA |
N3 | 13.334 bA | 13.155 bA | 13.709 abA | 14.455 aA | |
N4 | 10.954 aA | 10.618 aA | 10.907 aA | 11.164 aA | |
N5 | 6.948 bA | 6.749 bA | 7.621 abA | 8.018 aA | |
N6 | 3.711 aA | 3.709 aA | 4.448 aA | 4.641 aA |
Table 5 Difference in dry weight of culm, leaf sheath and internode per unit between indica and japonica super rice.
茎秆性状 Characters of culm | 基部节间 Basal internode | 镇稻11号 Zhendao 11 | 武运粳24号 Wuyunjing 24 | 扬两优6号 Yangliangyou 6 | 两优培九 Liangyoupeijiu |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
茎秆干质量 | N1 | 0.047 cB | 0.043 cB | 0.072 bA | 0.083 aA |
Dry weight of culm /(g·stem-1) | N2 | 0.115 bcA | 0.111 cA | 0.121 abA | 0.127 aA |
N3 | 0.144 bB | 0.138 bB | 0.164 aA | 0.169 aA | |
N4 | 0.165 bB | 0.156 bB | 0.189 aA | 0.191 aA | |
N5 | 0.140 bB | 0.135 bB | 0.171 aA | 0.177 aA | |
N6 | 0.132 bB | 0.129 bB | 0.165 aA | 0.169 aA | |
叶鞘干质量 | N1 | 0.123 bB | 0.128 bB | 0.130 bB | 0.164 aA |
Dry weight of leaf sheath /(g· stem-1) | N2 | 0.137 bB | 0.141 bB | 0.142 bB | 0.176 aA |
N3 | 0.141 bB | 0.147 bB | 0.144 bB | 0.181 aA | |
N4 | 0.140 bB | 0.149 bB | 0.140 bB | 0.178 aA | |
N5 | 0.139 bB | 0.147 bB | 0.140 bB | 0.175 aA | |
N6 | 0.138 bB | 0.145 bB | 0.135 bB | 0.173 aA | |
单位节间茎秆干质量 | N1 | 28.570 bB | 28.277 bB | 36.746 aA | 37.597 aA |
Dry weight per unit internode/(mg· cm-1) | N2 | 23.132 abA | 22.985 abA | 22.336 bA | 23.335 aA |
N3 | 13.334 bA | 13.155 bA | 13.709 abA | 14.455 aA | |
N4 | 10.954 aA | 10.618 aA | 10.907 aA | 11.164 aA | |
N5 | 6.948 bA | 6.749 bA | 7.621 abA | 8.018 aA | |
N6 | 3.711 aA | 3.709 aA | 4.448 aA | 4.641 aA |
品种 Cultivar | 固持力 Retaining force /(kg·hill-1) | 按压恢复度Recovery after pushing | 抗弯阻力Buckling resistance/N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
推压至60° Pushing to 60° | 推压至30° Pushing to 30° | 推动至60° Pushing to 60° | 推动至30° Pushing to 30° | |||
镇稻11号Zhendao 11 | 4.87 aA | 93.00 bA | 66.00 bB | 15.885 aA | 35.825 aA | |
武运粳24号Wuyunjing 24 | 4.57 aA | 92.44 bA | 63.67 bB | 15.404 aA | 35.014 aA | |
扬两优6号Yangliangyou 6 | 3.37 bB | 96.67 aA | 72.33 aA | 14.028 bA | 30.169 bB | |
两优培九Liangyoupeijiu | 3.58 bB | 97.89 aA | 74.11 aA | 14.278 bA | 30.705 bB |
Table 6 Difference in retaining ability and recovering characteristics after pushing between indica and japonica super rice.
品种 Cultivar | 固持力 Retaining force /(kg·hill-1) | 按压恢复度Recovery after pushing | 抗弯阻力Buckling resistance/N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
推压至60° Pushing to 60° | 推压至30° Pushing to 30° | 推动至60° Pushing to 60° | 推动至30° Pushing to 30° | |||
镇稻11号Zhendao 11 | 4.87 aA | 93.00 bA | 66.00 bB | 15.885 aA | 35.825 aA | |
武运粳24号Wuyunjing 24 | 4.57 aA | 92.44 bA | 63.67 bB | 15.404 aA | 35.014 aA | |
扬两优6号Yangliangyou 6 | 3.37 bB | 96.67 aA | 72.33 aA | 14.028 bA | 30.169 bB | |
两优培九Liangyoupeijiu | 3.58 bB | 97.89 aA | 74.11 aA | 14.278 bA | 30.705 bB |
[1] | FAO. Statistical Databases.Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the Untied Nations, 2004. |
[2] | 龚金龙, 邢志鹏, 胡雅杰, 等. “籼改粳”的相对优势及生产发展对策. 中国稻米, 2013, 19(5): 1-6. |
[3] | 李旭毅, 池忠志, 姜心禄, 等. 成都平原两熟区籼粳稻品种籽粒灌浆特性. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(16): 3256-3264. |
[4] | 卜祥. 粳稻潜力待挖. 农经杂志, 2011(2): 42-44. |
[5] | 张洪程, 张军, 龚金龙, 等. “籼改粳”的生产优势及其形成机理. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(4): 686-704. |
[6] | 程飞虎, 周培建. 江西适度发展粳稻的探索与思考. 中国农技推广, 2012, 28(1): 7-9. |
[7] | 张似松, 汤颢军, 柴婷婷, 等. 加快粳稻发展,进一步做强湖北省水稻产业. 湖北农业科学, 2012, 51(3): 450-453. |
[8] | 宋世枝, 段斌, 扶定, 等. 粳稻在豫南晚播的生长发育及增产效果研究. 信阳师范学院学报:自然科学版, 2002, 15(1): 104-106. |
[9] | 龚金龙, 张洪程, 李杰, 等. 超级稻生态育种及超高产栽培特征与途径的研究进展. 中国农业科技导报, 2011, 13(1): 25-33. |
[10] | 申广勒, 石英尧, 黄艳玲, 等. 水稻抗倒伏特性及其与茎秆性状的相关性研究. 中国农学通报, 2007, 23(12): 58-62. |
[11] | 李红娇, 张喜娟, 李伟娟, 等. 不同穗型粳稻品种抗倒伏性的比较. 中国水稻科学, 2009, 23(2): 191-196. |
[12] | 华泽田, 郝宪彬, 沈枫, 等. 东北地区超级杂交粳稻倒伏性状的研究. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2003, 34(3): 161-164. |
[13] | 杨世民, 谢力, 郑顺林, 等. 氮肥水平和栽插密度对杂交稻茎秆理化特性与抗倒伏性的影响. 作物学报, 2009, 35(1): 93-103. |
[14] | 刘立军, 袁莉民, 王志琴, 等. 旱种水稻倒伏生理原因分析与对策的初步研究. 中国水稻科学, 2002, 16(3): 225-230. |
[15] | 李杰, 张洪程, 龚金龙, 等. 不同种植方式对超级稻植株抗倒伏能力的影响. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(11): 2234-2243. |
[16] | 张庆, 殷春渊, 张洪程, 等. 水稻氮高产高效与低产低效两类品种株型特征差异研究. 作物学报, 2010, 36(6): 1011-1021. |
[17] | 李敏, 张洪程, 杨雄, 等. 不同氮利用效率基因型水稻茎秆特性比较. 作物学报, 2012, 38(7): 1277-1285. |
[18] | Koutroubas S D, Ntanos D A.Genotypic differences for grain yield and nitrogen utilization in indica and japonica rice under Mediterranean conditions.Field Crops Res, 2003, 83(3): 251-260. |
[19] | Ntanos D A, Koutroubas S D.Dry matter and N accumulation and translocation for indica and japonica rice under Mediterranean conditions.Field Crops Res, 2003, 74(1): 93-101. |
[20] | Asai H, Saito K, Samson B, et al.Yield response of indica and tropical japonica genotypes to soil fertility conditions under rainfed uplands in northern Laos.Field Crops Res, 2009, 112: 141-148. |
[21] | 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 等. 偏迟熟水稻北移及配套高产栽培技术的研究. 江苏农学院学报, 1996, 17(3): 51-56. |
[22] | 瀬古秀生, 佐本啓智, 鈴木嘉一郎. 水稲の倒伏に及ぼす二, 三栽培条件の影響(II). 日本作物学会紀事, 1959, 27(2): 173-176. |
[23] | 杨泽峰, 徐辰武, 顾世梁. SPSS农业试验数据分析实用教程. 南京: 南京大学出版社, 2009. |
[24] | 龚金龙, 邢志鹏, 胡雅杰, 等. 籼、粳超级稻根系形态生理特征的差异研究. 作物学报, 2014, 40(6): 1073-1089. |
[25] | Setter T L, Laureles E V, Mazaredo A M.Lodging reduces yield of rice by self-shading and reductions in canopy photosynthesis.Field Crops Res, 1997, 49: 95-106. |
[26] | 龚金龙, 胡雅杰, 葛梦婕, 等. 南方粳型超级稻氮肥群体最高生产力及其形成特征的研究. 核农学报, 2012, 26(3): 558-572. |
[27] | 郭保卫, 张春华, 陈厚存, 等. 抛秧立苗的根系特点及其对水稻生长的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2011, 25(6): 623-630. |
[28] | 张倩, 张明才, 张海燕, 等. 30%矮·烯微乳剂对水稻茎秆理化特性的调控. 作物学报, 2013, 39(6): 1089-1095. |
[29] | 张洪程, 朱聪聪, 霍中洋, 等. 钵苗机插水稻产量形成优势及主要生理生态特点. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(21): 50-59. |
[30] | Kashiwagi T, Ishimaru K.Identification and functional analysis of a locus for improvement of lodging resistance in rice.Plant Physiol, 2004, 134(2): 676-683. |
[31] | Ishimaru K, Togawa E, Ookawa T, et al.New target for rice lodging resistance and its effect in a typhoon.Planta, 2008, 227(3): 601-609. |
[32] | 刘立军, 王康君, 葛立立, 等. 旱种水稻基部节间性状与倒伏的关系及其生理机制. 作物学报, 2012, 38(5): 848-856. |
[33] | 郎有忠, 杨晓东, 王美娥, 等. 结实阶段不同时期倒伏对水稻产量及稻米品质的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2011, 25(4): 407-412. |
[34] | 孙永健, 陈宇, 孙园园, 等. 不同施氮量和栽插密度下三角形强化栽培杂交稻抗倒伏性与群体质量的关系. 中国水稻科学, 2012, 26(2): 189-196. |
[35] | 窦永秀. 水稻结实期抗倒性评价及倒伏对产量与品质影响的研究. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2008. |
[36] | 雷小龙, 刘利, 苟文, 等. 种植方式对杂交籼稻植株抗倒伏特性的影响. 作物学报, 2013, 39(10): 1814-1825. |
[37] | 马均, 马文波, 田彦华, 等. 重穗型水稻植株抗倒伏能力的研究. 作物学报, 2004, 30(2): 143-148. |
[1] | LI Gang, GAO Qingsong, LI Wei, ZHANG Wenxia, WANG Jian, CHEN Baoshan, WANG Di, GAO Hao, XU Weijun, CHEN Hongqi, JI Jianhui. Directed Knockout of SD1 Gene Improves Lodging Resistance and Blast Resistance of Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 359-367. |
[2] | HUANG Yaru, XU Peng, WANG Lele, HE Yizhe, WANG Hui, KE Jian, HE Haibing, WU Liquan, YOU Cuicui. Effects of Exogenous Trehalose on Grain Filling Characteristics and Yield Formation of japonica Rice Cultivar W1844 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 379-391. |
[3] | ZHANG Xiaopeng, GONG Yanlong, YAN Bingchun, LI Li, LI Kunyi, WANG Yiwei, JU Xiaotang, CHEN Xiaoyi, XU Hai. Effects of Trinexapac-ethyl on Lodging Resistance, Yield and Rice Quality of Northern Rice with Good Quality [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2022, 36(2): 181-194. |
[4] | Qing ZHANG, Baowei GUO, Yajie HU, Hongcheng ZHANG, Yufeng XU, Xiaojie XU, Banghui ZHU, Jiefen XU, Zhongyi NIU, Rongwen TU. Differences in Yield and Rice Quality of Soft <i>japonica </i>Rice with High Quality and High Yield Under Different Nitrogen Levels [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2021, 35(6): 606-616. |
[5] | Wenxia WANG, Yanzhi ZHOU, Yongjun ZENG, Ziming WU, Xueming TAN, Xiaohua PAN, Qinghua SHI, Yanhua ZENG. Effects of Different Mechanical Direct Seeding Patterns on Yield and Lodging Resistance of High-Quality Late indica Rice in South China [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2020, 34(1): 46-56. |
[6] | Zhenxing XIE, Junian ZHANG, Qi LIN, Feng LIU, Chuzhang ZHANG, Fangmei ZHUO, Zhaowei JIANG, Chuanying ZHUO. Effect of Plant Growth Regulators on Rice Lodging Resistance and Grain Production of Main-crop and Ratooning Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2019, 33(2): 158-166. |
[7] | Chang LIU, Lai-geng LI. Advances in Molecular Understanding of Rice Lodging Resistance [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2016, 30(2): 216-222. |
[8] | Zhong-hua SHENG, Zi-liang ZHU, Ning MA, Wei LI, Ji-wai HE, Xiang-jin WEI, Gao-neng SHAO, Jian-long WANG, Pei-song HU, Shao-qing TANG. QTL Mapping of Yield Related Traits in Super Rice Variety Zhongjiazao 17 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2016, 30(1): 35-43. |
[9] | Xue-qin YANG, Ting-ting CHEN, Xia ZHAO, Cai-xia ZHANG, Yong-jie YANG, Guan-fu FU, Long-xing TAO. Mechanism Behind the Effects of GA3 and PP333 on Grain Yield Formation of Super Rice Yongyou 12 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2016, 30(1): 53-61. |
[10] | Nan XIA, Hong-wei ZHAO, Yan-chao LV, Zhen-dong ZHAO, De-tang ZOU, Hua-long LIU, Jing-guo WANG, Yan JIA. Effect of Cold-water Stress at Grain-filling Stage on Starch Accumulation and Related Enzyme Activities in Grains of japonica Rice in Cold-region [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2016, 30(1): 62-74. |
[11] | Li-nan ZHU, Hai-ying LIU, Lu-lu SUN, Tao SUN, Xue-dong GUO, Fang-xu ZHU, Zhong-chen ZHANG, Zheng-xun JIN. Analysis of Expression Characteristics of Isoamylase and the Correlation with Starch Content During Grain Filling in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2015, 29(5): 528-534. |
[12] | Yang LIU, Er-bao LIU, Si-yuan ZENG, Wei PU, Qiang-ming LIU, Li-jun LIANG, Pei-rui LIU, Qi-meng ZHANG, De-lin HONG. Identification of Molecular Marker Fragments Associated with Combining Ability for Quality Traits in Parents of Hybrid japonica Rice (Oryza sativa L.) [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2015, 29(4): 373-381. |
[13] | Yan JIA, Yang SHEN, De-tang ZOU, Han-jing SHA, Jing-guo WANG, Hua-long LIU, Zhen-dong ZHAO, Nan XIA, Hong-wei ZHAO. Effect of Cold-Water Irrigation at Booting Stage on Grain Filling and Nitrogen Accumulation of Rice in Cold-Region [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2015, 29(3): 259-272. |
[14] | Bao-wei GUO, Da-wei ZHU, Ke XU, Hong-cheng ZHANG, Xing-tao ZHOU, Cong-cong ZHU, Li-qiang CAO, Hou-cun CHEN, Jing-du CHEN, Qi-gen DAI, Zhong-yang HUO, Hai-yan WEI, Ming-yin LI. Effect of Ordered Transplanting and Optimized Broadcasting on the Culm Lodging Resistance of Super Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2015, 29(1): 45-55. |
[15] | LEI Xiaolong 1, LIU Li1, LIU Bo1, HUANG Guangzhong2, MA Rongchao1,*, REN Wanjun1,*. Physical and Chemical Characteristics and Lodging Resistance of Culm of indica Hybrid Rice F you 498 under Mechanical Planting [J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2014, 28(6): 612-620. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||