中国水稻科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (4): 422-436.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2024.231116
吕宙1, 易秉怀1, 陈平平1, 周文新1,*(), 唐文帮2,3,*(), 易镇邪1,*()
收稿日期:
2023-11-27
修回日期:
2024-03-05
出版日期:
2024-07-10
发布日期:
2024-07-11
通讯作者:
*email: zwxok@hunau.net, tangwenbang@163.com, yizhenxie@126.com
基金资助:
LÜ Zhou1, YI Binghuai1, CHEN Pingping1, ZHOU Wenxin1,*(), TANG Wenbang2,3,*(), YI Zhenxie1,*()
Received:
2023-11-27
Revised:
2024-03-05
Online:
2024-07-10
Published:
2024-07-11
Contact:
*email: zwxok@hunau.net, tangwenbang@163.com, yizhenxie@126.com
摘要:
【目的】 明确小粒型杂交稻的产量形成特性。【方法】 以卓两优0985(小粒型杂交稻)和丰两优4号(对照)为材料,在不同施氮量(0,N0;180 kg/hm2,N1;210 kg/hm2,N2)和密度(26.7 cm×20.0 cm,D1;20.0 cm×20.0 cm,D2;20.0 cm×16.7 cm,D3)条件下开展大田试验。【结果】 两品种LAI、叶片SPAD值随施氮量增大而提高,N1与N2差异不显著,但显著高于N0处理;两品种茎鞘物质输出率随施氮量增大而下降,而叶片物质输出率表现相反;两品种产量随施氮量增加而提高,但N1与N2间差异不显著,不同密度处理下一般以D2处理较高;N0处理下卓两优0985产量显著高于对照品种,而施氮条件下两品种产量相当。【结论】 卓两优0985产量形成特性为叶面积较小、穗粒数较多、库源比较大,灌浆中后期光合优势明显,花后物质积累量与茎叶物质转运率、经济系数较高,不施氮条件下具有较高产量等。本研究条件下,卓两优0985以N1D2(180 kg/hm2、20 cm×20 cm)为最佳处理。
吕宙, 易秉怀, 陈平平, 周文新, 唐文帮, 易镇邪. 施氮量与移栽密度对小粒型杂交水稻产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 422-436.
LÜ Zhou, YI Binghuai, CHEN Pingping, ZHOU Wenxin, TANG Wenbang, YI Zhenxie. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate and Transplanting Density on Yield Formation of Small Seed Hybrid Rice[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 422-436.
处理 Treatment | 卓两优0985 Zhuoliangyou 0985 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2022 | 2023 | |||||||||
孕穗期 Booting | 灌浆中期 Mid-filling | 成熟期 Maturity | 孕穗期 Booting | 灌浆中期 Mid-filling | 成熟期 Maturity | |||||
N0D1 | 3.72±0.16 bc | 3.27±0.19 b | 2.36±0.18 c | 3.88±0.17 b | 3.28±0.16 c | 2.44±0.14 c | ||||
N0D2 | 4.05±0.20 c | 3.44±0.18 b | 2.65±0.17 c | 4.06±0.14 b | 3.54±0.13 bc | 2.67±0.12 c | ||||
N0D3 | 3.48±0.18 b | 2.93±0.16 b | 2.27±0.15 c | 3.52±0.15 b | 3.98±0.14 b | 2.31±0.12 c | ||||
平均 Mean | 3.75 | 3.21 | 2.43 | 3.82 | 3.60 | 2.47 | ||||
N1D1 | 6.85±0.17 a | 5.92±0.17 a | 5.02±0.15 b | 6.94±0.21 a | 6.02±0.16 a | 5.12±0.15 b | ||||
N1D2 | 7.02±0.22 a | 6.12±0.21 a | 5.24±0.19 a | 7.21±0.16 a | 6.21±0.16 a | 5.26±0.20 a | ||||
N1D3 | 6.77±0.20 a | 5.86±0.19 a | 4.88±0.20 b | 6.78±0.17 a | 5.92±0.16 a | 4.89±0.16 b | ||||
平均Mean | 6.88 | 5.97 | 5.05 | 6.98 | 6.05 | 5.09 | ||||
N2D1 | 6.97±0.19 a | 6.15±0.13 a | 5.23±0.13 a | 7.02±0.15 a | 6.21±0.16 a | 5.26±0.18 a | ||||
N2D2 | 7.22±0.14 a | 6.33±0.21 a | 5.51±0.14 a | 7.36±0.15 a | 6.38±0.14 a | 5.64±0.19 a | ||||
N2D3 | 6.82±0.21 a | 6.02±0.20 a | 5.12±0.15 ab | 6.94±0.19 a | 6.04±0.19 a | 5.21±0.18 ab | ||||
平均Mean | 7.00 | 6.17 | 5.29 | 7.11 | 6.21 | 5.37 | ||||
F值 F value | 72.82 | 60.81 | 71.54 | 93.44 | 67.32 | 73.43 | ||||
施氮量 N rate(N) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ||||
密度 Density(D) | * | * | * | ** | ns | * | ||||
施氮量×密度 N×D | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||||
处理 Treatment | 丰两优4号 Fengliangyou 4 | |||||||||
2022 | 2023 | |||||||||
孕穗期 Booting | 灌浆中期 Mid-filling | 成熟期 Maturity | 孕穗期 Booting | 灌浆中期 Mid-filling | 成熟期 Maturity | |||||
N0D1 | 4.12±0.13 c | 2.98±0.16 cd | 2.26±0.16 c | 4.19±0.15 cd | 2.99±0.16 c | 2.31±0.13 d | ||||
N0D2 | 4.45±0.10 c | 3.39±0.16 c | 2.43±0.14 c | 4.56±0.17 c | 3.41±0.15 c | 2.51±0.12 d | ||||
N0D3 | 3.68±0.14 d | 2.83±0.16 d | 2.12±0.13 c | 3.84±0.14 d | 2.89±0.16 cd | 2.24±0.14 d | ||||
平均Mean | 4.08 | 3.07 | 2.27 | 4.20 | 3.10 | 2.35 | ||||
N1D1 | 7.55±0.16 ab | 6.77±0.17 ab | 5.94±0.15 ab | 7.66±0.13 ab | 6.81±0.19 ab | 6.04±0.11 abc | ||||
N1D2 | 7.89±0.16 a | 6.98±0.15 a | 6.08±0.16 a | 7.96±0.17 ab | 7.13±0.19 a | 6.24±0.12 ab | ||||
N1D3 | 7.31±0.16 b | 6.48±0.16 b | 5.63±0.14 b | 7.42±0.13 b | 6.51±0.17 b | 5.71±0.15 c | ||||
平均Mean | 7.58 | 6.74 | 5.88 | 7.68 | 6.82 | 6.00 | ||||
N2D1 | 7.62±0.16 ab | 6.81±0.15 ab | 6.02±0.17 ab | 7.69±0.16 ab | 6.92±0.19 ab | 6.04±0.14 abc | ||||
N2D2 | 7.96±0.19 a | 7.14±0.15 a | 6.28±0.12 a | 8.03±0.16 a | 7.24±0.18 a | 6.36±0.12 a | ||||
N2D3 | 7.55±0.15 ab | 6.72±0.16 ab | 5.94±0.17 ab | 7.58±0.15 b | 6.81±0.18 a | 5.89±0.14 bc | ||||
平均Mean | 7.71 | 6.89 | 6.08 | 7.77 | 6.99 | 6.10 | ||||
F值 F value | 138.80 | 142.74 | 144.74 | 137.30 | 121.58 | 204.87 | ||||
施氮量 N rate(N) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ||||
密度 Density(D) | * | * | * | * | ns | ns | ||||
施氮量×密度 N×D | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
表1 施氮量与移栽密度对小粒杂交稻叶面积指数的影响
Table 1. Effect of nitrogen application and transplanting density on leaf area index of small-seed hybrid rice
处理 Treatment | 卓两优0985 Zhuoliangyou 0985 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2022 | 2023 | |||||||||
孕穗期 Booting | 灌浆中期 Mid-filling | 成熟期 Maturity | 孕穗期 Booting | 灌浆中期 Mid-filling | 成熟期 Maturity | |||||
N0D1 | 3.72±0.16 bc | 3.27±0.19 b | 2.36±0.18 c | 3.88±0.17 b | 3.28±0.16 c | 2.44±0.14 c | ||||
N0D2 | 4.05±0.20 c | 3.44±0.18 b | 2.65±0.17 c | 4.06±0.14 b | 3.54±0.13 bc | 2.67±0.12 c | ||||
N0D3 | 3.48±0.18 b | 2.93±0.16 b | 2.27±0.15 c | 3.52±0.15 b | 3.98±0.14 b | 2.31±0.12 c | ||||
平均 Mean | 3.75 | 3.21 | 2.43 | 3.82 | 3.60 | 2.47 | ||||
N1D1 | 6.85±0.17 a | 5.92±0.17 a | 5.02±0.15 b | 6.94±0.21 a | 6.02±0.16 a | 5.12±0.15 b | ||||
N1D2 | 7.02±0.22 a | 6.12±0.21 a | 5.24±0.19 a | 7.21±0.16 a | 6.21±0.16 a | 5.26±0.20 a | ||||
N1D3 | 6.77±0.20 a | 5.86±0.19 a | 4.88±0.20 b | 6.78±0.17 a | 5.92±0.16 a | 4.89±0.16 b | ||||
平均Mean | 6.88 | 5.97 | 5.05 | 6.98 | 6.05 | 5.09 | ||||
N2D1 | 6.97±0.19 a | 6.15±0.13 a | 5.23±0.13 a | 7.02±0.15 a | 6.21±0.16 a | 5.26±0.18 a | ||||
N2D2 | 7.22±0.14 a | 6.33±0.21 a | 5.51±0.14 a | 7.36±0.15 a | 6.38±0.14 a | 5.64±0.19 a | ||||
N2D3 | 6.82±0.21 a | 6.02±0.20 a | 5.12±0.15 ab | 6.94±0.19 a | 6.04±0.19 a | 5.21±0.18 ab | ||||
平均Mean | 7.00 | 6.17 | 5.29 | 7.11 | 6.21 | 5.37 | ||||
F值 F value | 72.82 | 60.81 | 71.54 | 93.44 | 67.32 | 73.43 | ||||
施氮量 N rate(N) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ||||
密度 Density(D) | * | * | * | ** | ns | * | ||||
施氮量×密度 N×D | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||||
处理 Treatment | 丰两优4号 Fengliangyou 4 | |||||||||
2022 | 2023 | |||||||||
孕穗期 Booting | 灌浆中期 Mid-filling | 成熟期 Maturity | 孕穗期 Booting | 灌浆中期 Mid-filling | 成熟期 Maturity | |||||
N0D1 | 4.12±0.13 c | 2.98±0.16 cd | 2.26±0.16 c | 4.19±0.15 cd | 2.99±0.16 c | 2.31±0.13 d | ||||
N0D2 | 4.45±0.10 c | 3.39±0.16 c | 2.43±0.14 c | 4.56±0.17 c | 3.41±0.15 c | 2.51±0.12 d | ||||
N0D3 | 3.68±0.14 d | 2.83±0.16 d | 2.12±0.13 c | 3.84±0.14 d | 2.89±0.16 cd | 2.24±0.14 d | ||||
平均Mean | 4.08 | 3.07 | 2.27 | 4.20 | 3.10 | 2.35 | ||||
N1D1 | 7.55±0.16 ab | 6.77±0.17 ab | 5.94±0.15 ab | 7.66±0.13 ab | 6.81±0.19 ab | 6.04±0.11 abc | ||||
N1D2 | 7.89±0.16 a | 6.98±0.15 a | 6.08±0.16 a | 7.96±0.17 ab | 7.13±0.19 a | 6.24±0.12 ab | ||||
N1D3 | 7.31±0.16 b | 6.48±0.16 b | 5.63±0.14 b | 7.42±0.13 b | 6.51±0.17 b | 5.71±0.15 c | ||||
平均Mean | 7.58 | 6.74 | 5.88 | 7.68 | 6.82 | 6.00 | ||||
N2D1 | 7.62±0.16 ab | 6.81±0.15 ab | 6.02±0.17 ab | 7.69±0.16 ab | 6.92±0.19 ab | 6.04±0.14 abc | ||||
N2D2 | 7.96±0.19 a | 7.14±0.15 a | 6.28±0.12 a | 8.03±0.16 a | 7.24±0.18 a | 6.36±0.12 a | ||||
N2D3 | 7.55±0.15 ab | 6.72±0.16 ab | 5.94±0.17 ab | 7.58±0.15 b | 6.81±0.18 a | 5.89±0.14 bc | ||||
平均Mean | 7.71 | 6.89 | 6.08 | 7.77 | 6.99 | 6.10 | ||||
F值 F value | 138.80 | 142.74 | 144.74 | 137.30 | 121.58 | 204.87 | ||||
施氮量 N rate(N) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ||||
密度 Density(D) | * | * | * | * | ns | ns | ||||
施氮量×密度 N×D | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
处理 Treatment | 卓两优0985 Zhuoliangyou 0985 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2022 | 2023 | |||||||||||
孕穗期 Booting | 灌浆中期 Mid-filling | 成熟期 Maturity | 孕穗期 Booting | 灌浆中期 Mid-filling | 成熟期 Maturity | |||||||
N0D1 | 29.05±0.891 d | 27.11±0.92 b | 22.51±0.52 b | 29.14±0.77 d | 27.58±0.52 b | 22.54±0.49 b | ||||||
N0D2 | 31.22±0.60 cd | 28.24±0.65 b | 23.01±0.17 b | 30.17±0.57 cd | 28.48±0.50 b | 22.63±0.47 b | ||||||
N0D3 | 32.65±0.53 c | 28.69±0.66 b | 23.71±0.70 b | 31.22±0.58 c | 28.65±0.57 b | 23.15±0.57 b | ||||||
平均Mean | 30.97 | 28.01 | 23.08 | 30.18 | 28.24 | 22.77 | ||||||
N1D1 | 42.66±0.78 b | 42.56±0.77 a | 34.66±0.62 a | 42.51±0.59 b | 42.66±0.59 a | 34.88±0.50 a | ||||||
N1D2 | 42.55±0.70 b | 43.54±0.82 a | 35.62±0.58 a | 42.57±0.56 b | 44.15±0.50 a | 35.21±0.56 a | ||||||
N1D3 | 43.02±0.48 b | 43.35±0.71 a | 36.05±0.55 a | 43.15±0.54 b | 43.68±0.83 a | 35.24±0.63 a | ||||||
平均Mean | 42.74 | 43.15 | 35.44 | 42.74 | 43.50 | 35.11 | ||||||
N2D1 | 42.57±0.42 b | 43.17±0.54 a | 34.68±0.53 a | 42.68±0.48 b | 43.12±0.49 a | 35.14±0.40 a | ||||||
N2D2 | 44.79±0.77 ab | 43.31±0.75 a | 35.47±0.57 a | 43.58±0.51 ab | 44.02±0.48 a | 35.27±0.52 a | ||||||
N2D3 | 46.25±0.60 a | 43.44±0.66 a | 36.24±0.62 a | 45.15±0.49 a | 43.94±0.56 a | 36.12±0.62 a | ||||||
平均Mean | 44.54 | 43.31 | 35.46 | 43.80 | 43.69 | 35.51 | ||||||
F值 F value | 101.58 | 109.7 | 128.83 | 133.82 | 181.67 | 137.97 | ||||||
施氮量 N rate(N) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ||||||
密度 Density(D) | ** | ns | * | ** | ns | ns | ||||||
施氮量×密度N×D | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||||||
处理 Treatment | 丰两优4号 Fengliangyou 4 | |||||||||||
2022 | 2023 | |||||||||||
孕穗期 Booting | 灌浆中期 Mid-filling | 成熟期 Maturity | 孕穗期 Booting | 灌浆中期 Mid-filling | 成熟期 Maturity | |||||||
N0D1 | 30.25±0.66 c | 27.44±0.52 b | 18.77±0.49 b | 30.25±0.43 b | 27.54±0.47 c | 18.89±0.50 b | ||||||
N0D2 | 30.85±0.47 c | 27.67±0.31 b | 18.66±0.51 b | 30.87±0.30 b | 27.68±0.40 c | 18.47±0.30 b | ||||||
N0D3 | 30.25±0.51 c | 27.75±0.71 b | 19.02±0.59 b | 31.25±0.49 b | 27.99±0.51 c | 19.35±0.52 b | ||||||
平均Mean | 30.45 | 27.62 | 18.82 | 30.79 | 27.74 | 18.90 | ||||||
N1D1 | 44.58±0.58 b | 41.29±0.55 a | 27.55±0.53 a | 44.68±0.52 a | 40.28±0.40 b | 27.68±0.40 a | ||||||
N1D2 | 44.21±0.54 b | 41.05±0.85 a | 28.01±0.41 a | 44.98±0.53 a | 40.98±0.34 ab | 28.42±0.58 a | ||||||
N1D3 | 45.04±0.54 ab | 41.25±0.48 a | 28.61±0.60 a | 45.24±0.44 a | 41.25±0.51 ab | 28.69±0.54 a | ||||||
平均Mean | 44.61 | 41.20 | 28.06 | 44.97 | 40.84 | 28.26 | ||||||
N2D1 | 45.02±0.57 ab | 41.78±0.51 a | 27.42±0.57 a | 43.98±0.43 a | 41.58±0.42 a | 28.01±0.46 a | ||||||
N2D2 | 45.41±0.52 ab | 40.87±0.59 a | 28.11±0.36 a | 44.68±0.44 a | 41.27±0.42 ab | 27.59±0.41 a | ||||||
N2D3 | 46.25±0.60 a | 41.55±0.55 a | 28.67±0.52 a | 45.29±0.40 a | 41.65±0.42 a | 28.64±0.47 a | ||||||
平均Mean | 45.56 | 41.40 | 28.07 | 44.65 | 41.50 | 28.08 | ||||||
F值 F value | 179.44 | 144.07 | 82.44 | 244.52 | 239.43 | 97.53 | ||||||
施氮量 N rate(N) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ||||||
密度 Density(D) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||||||
施氮量×密度N×D | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
表2 施氮量与移栽密度对小粒杂交稻叶片SPAD值的影响
Table 2. Effect of nitrogen application and transplanting density on SPAD value of small-seed hybrid rice
处理 Treatment | 卓两优0985 Zhuoliangyou 0985 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2022 | 2023 | |||||||||||
孕穗期 Booting | 灌浆中期 Mid-filling | 成熟期 Maturity | 孕穗期 Booting | 灌浆中期 Mid-filling | 成熟期 Maturity | |||||||
N0D1 | 29.05±0.891 d | 27.11±0.92 b | 22.51±0.52 b | 29.14±0.77 d | 27.58±0.52 b | 22.54±0.49 b | ||||||
N0D2 | 31.22±0.60 cd | 28.24±0.65 b | 23.01±0.17 b | 30.17±0.57 cd | 28.48±0.50 b | 22.63±0.47 b | ||||||
N0D3 | 32.65±0.53 c | 28.69±0.66 b | 23.71±0.70 b | 31.22±0.58 c | 28.65±0.57 b | 23.15±0.57 b | ||||||
平均Mean | 30.97 | 28.01 | 23.08 | 30.18 | 28.24 | 22.77 | ||||||
N1D1 | 42.66±0.78 b | 42.56±0.77 a | 34.66±0.62 a | 42.51±0.59 b | 42.66±0.59 a | 34.88±0.50 a | ||||||
N1D2 | 42.55±0.70 b | 43.54±0.82 a | 35.62±0.58 a | 42.57±0.56 b | 44.15±0.50 a | 35.21±0.56 a | ||||||
N1D3 | 43.02±0.48 b | 43.35±0.71 a | 36.05±0.55 a | 43.15±0.54 b | 43.68±0.83 a | 35.24±0.63 a | ||||||
平均Mean | 42.74 | 43.15 | 35.44 | 42.74 | 43.50 | 35.11 | ||||||
N2D1 | 42.57±0.42 b | 43.17±0.54 a | 34.68±0.53 a | 42.68±0.48 b | 43.12±0.49 a | 35.14±0.40 a | ||||||
N2D2 | 44.79±0.77 ab | 43.31±0.75 a | 35.47±0.57 a | 43.58±0.51 ab | 44.02±0.48 a | 35.27±0.52 a | ||||||
N2D3 | 46.25±0.60 a | 43.44±0.66 a | 36.24±0.62 a | 45.15±0.49 a | 43.94±0.56 a | 36.12±0.62 a | ||||||
平均Mean | 44.54 | 43.31 | 35.46 | 43.80 | 43.69 | 35.51 | ||||||
F值 F value | 101.58 | 109.7 | 128.83 | 133.82 | 181.67 | 137.97 | ||||||
施氮量 N rate(N) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ||||||
密度 Density(D) | ** | ns | * | ** | ns | ns | ||||||
施氮量×密度N×D | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||||||
处理 Treatment | 丰两优4号 Fengliangyou 4 | |||||||||||
2022 | 2023 | |||||||||||
孕穗期 Booting | 灌浆中期 Mid-filling | 成熟期 Maturity | 孕穗期 Booting | 灌浆中期 Mid-filling | 成熟期 Maturity | |||||||
N0D1 | 30.25±0.66 c | 27.44±0.52 b | 18.77±0.49 b | 30.25±0.43 b | 27.54±0.47 c | 18.89±0.50 b | ||||||
N0D2 | 30.85±0.47 c | 27.67±0.31 b | 18.66±0.51 b | 30.87±0.30 b | 27.68±0.40 c | 18.47±0.30 b | ||||||
N0D3 | 30.25±0.51 c | 27.75±0.71 b | 19.02±0.59 b | 31.25±0.49 b | 27.99±0.51 c | 19.35±0.52 b | ||||||
平均Mean | 30.45 | 27.62 | 18.82 | 30.79 | 27.74 | 18.90 | ||||||
N1D1 | 44.58±0.58 b | 41.29±0.55 a | 27.55±0.53 a | 44.68±0.52 a | 40.28±0.40 b | 27.68±0.40 a | ||||||
N1D2 | 44.21±0.54 b | 41.05±0.85 a | 28.01±0.41 a | 44.98±0.53 a | 40.98±0.34 ab | 28.42±0.58 a | ||||||
N1D3 | 45.04±0.54 ab | 41.25±0.48 a | 28.61±0.60 a | 45.24±0.44 a | 41.25±0.51 ab | 28.69±0.54 a | ||||||
平均Mean | 44.61 | 41.20 | 28.06 | 44.97 | 40.84 | 28.26 | ||||||
N2D1 | 45.02±0.57 ab | 41.78±0.51 a | 27.42±0.57 a | 43.98±0.43 a | 41.58±0.42 a | 28.01±0.46 a | ||||||
N2D2 | 45.41±0.52 ab | 40.87±0.59 a | 28.11±0.36 a | 44.68±0.44 a | 41.27±0.42 ab | 27.59±0.41 a | ||||||
N2D3 | 46.25±0.60 a | 41.55±0.55 a | 28.67±0.52 a | 45.29±0.40 a | 41.65±0.42 a | 28.64±0.47 a | ||||||
平均Mean | 45.56 | 41.40 | 28.07 | 44.65 | 41.50 | 28.08 | ||||||
F值 F value | 179.44 | 144.07 | 82.44 | 244.52 | 239.43 | 97.53 | ||||||
施氮量 N rate(N) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ||||||
密度 Density(D) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||||||
施氮量×密度N×D | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
处理 Treatment | 2022 | 2023 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
卓两优0985 Zhuoliangyou 0985 | 丰两优4号 Fengliangyou 4 | 卓两优0985 Zhuoliangyou 0985 | 丰两优4号 Fengliangyou 4 | ||
N0D1 | 18.22±0.30 c | 16.25±0.46 c | 18.46±0.29 c | 16.56±0.27 c | |
N0D2 | 18.25±0.33 c | 16.87±0.31 c | 18.49±0.30 c | 16.74±0.24 c | |
N0D3 | 18.67±0.42 c | 16.59±0.41 c | 18.52±0.20 c | 16.68±0.29 c | |
平均Mean | 18.38 | 16.57 | 17.49 | 16.66 | |
N1D1 | 23.86±0.45 b | 20.44±0.46 b | 23.88±0.30 b | 20.65±0.25 b | |
N1D2 | 24.58±0.34 ab | 21.24±0.41 ab | 23.96±0.45 ab | 20.87±0.27 ab | |
N1D3 | 24.98±0.40 ab | 21.41±0.28 ab | 24.15±0.44 ab | 21.17±0.39 ab | |
平均Mean | 24.47 | 21.03 | 24.00 | 20.90 | |
N2D1 | 23.99±0.26 ab | 20.46±0.29 ab | 23.98±0.23 b | 20.55±0.29 b | |
N2D2 | 24.66±0.44 ab | 21.31±0.32 ab | 24.54±0.39 ab | 21.54±0.24 a | |
N2D3 | 25.06±0.45 a | 21.54±0.30 a | 24.98±0.31 a | 21.69±0.42 a | |
平均Mean | 24.57 | 21.10 | 24.50 | 21.26 | |
F值 F value | 63.49 | 39.064 | 72.40 | 54.82 | |
施氮量 N rate(N) | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
密度 Density(D) | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
施氮量×密度 N×D | ns | ns | ns | ns |
表3 施氮量与移栽密度对小粒杂交稻叶片灌浆期净光合速率的影响
Table 3. Effect of nitrogen application and transplanting density on net photosynthetic rate of small-seed hybrid rice leaves at filling stage [μmol/(m2·s)]
处理 Treatment | 2022 | 2023 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
卓两优0985 Zhuoliangyou 0985 | 丰两优4号 Fengliangyou 4 | 卓两优0985 Zhuoliangyou 0985 | 丰两优4号 Fengliangyou 4 | ||
N0D1 | 18.22±0.30 c | 16.25±0.46 c | 18.46±0.29 c | 16.56±0.27 c | |
N0D2 | 18.25±0.33 c | 16.87±0.31 c | 18.49±0.30 c | 16.74±0.24 c | |
N0D3 | 18.67±0.42 c | 16.59±0.41 c | 18.52±0.20 c | 16.68±0.29 c | |
平均Mean | 18.38 | 16.57 | 17.49 | 16.66 | |
N1D1 | 23.86±0.45 b | 20.44±0.46 b | 23.88±0.30 b | 20.65±0.25 b | |
N1D2 | 24.58±0.34 ab | 21.24±0.41 ab | 23.96±0.45 ab | 20.87±0.27 ab | |
N1D3 | 24.98±0.40 ab | 21.41±0.28 ab | 24.15±0.44 ab | 21.17±0.39 ab | |
平均Mean | 24.47 | 21.03 | 24.00 | 20.90 | |
N2D1 | 23.99±0.26 ab | 20.46±0.29 ab | 23.98±0.23 b | 20.55±0.29 b | |
N2D2 | 24.66±0.44 ab | 21.31±0.32 ab | 24.54±0.39 ab | 21.54±0.24 a | |
N2D3 | 25.06±0.45 a | 21.54±0.30 a | 24.98±0.31 a | 21.69±0.42 a | |
平均Mean | 24.57 | 21.10 | 24.50 | 21.26 | |
F值 F value | 63.49 | 39.064 | 72.40 | 54.82 | |
施氮量 N rate(N) | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
密度 Density(D) | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
施氮量×密度 N×D | ns | ns | ns | ns |
处理 Treatment | 卓两优0985 Zhuoliangyou 0985 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2022 | 2023 | ||||||||
齐穗期 Full heading | 灌浆中期 Mid-filling | 成熟期 Maturity | 齐穗期 Full heading | 灌浆中期 Mid-filling | 成熟期 Maturity | ||||
N0D1 | 0.97±0.01 a | 0.99±0.01 ab | 1.37±0.06 a | 1.03±0.02 a | 1.06±0.02 a | 1.43±0.03 a | |||
N0D2 | 0.87±0.01 c | 0.94±0.01 c | 1.21±0.03 b | 0.92±0.03 c | 0.97±0.03 b | 1.28±0.04 b | |||
N0D3 | 0.96±0.01 a | 1.00±0.04 a | 1.30±0.06 ab | 1.02±0.02 ab | 0.99±0.02 b | 1.37±0.02 a | |||
平均Mean | 0.93 | 0.98 | 1.29 | 0.99 | 1.01 | 1.36 | |||
N1D1 | 0.88±0.01 bc | 0.95±0.01 bc | 1.12±0.03 bc | 0.94±0.02 bc | 1.01±0.02 ab | 1.18±0.02 c | |||
N1D2 | 0.91±0.01 b | 0.97±0.01 bc | 1.13±0.03 bc | 0.96±0.02 bc | 1.01±0.03 ab | 1.19±0.03 c | |||
N1D3 | 0.91±0.01 b | 0.97±0.01 bc | 1.17±0.01 bc | 0.95±0.02 bc | 1.00±0.02 ab | 1.21±0.02 bc | |||
平均Mean | 0.90 | 0.96 | 1.14 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 1.19 | |||
N2D1 | 0.88±0.01 bc | 0.93±0.01 c | 1.09±0.01 c | 0.95±0.03 bc | 1.00±0.031 ab | 1.18±0.04 c | |||
N2D2 | 0.88±0.01 bc | 0.95±0.01 bc | 1.09±0.02 c | 0.94±0.02 bc | 1.01±0.025 ab | 1.15±0.03 c | |||
N2D3 | 0.92±0.02 b | 0.97±0.01 bc | 1.14±0.01 bc | 0.94±0.02 bc | 0.98±0.023 ab | 1.14±0.03 c | |||
平均Mean | 0.89 | 0.95 | 1.11 | 0.94 | 1.00 | 1.16 | |||
F值 F value | 9.2 | 3.76 | 8.62 | 3.02 | 1.17 | 12.48 | |||
施氮量 N rate(N) | ** | * | ** | * | ns | ** | |||
密度 Density(D) | * | * | ns | ns | ns | ns | |||
施氮量×密度N×D | ** | ns | ns | * | ns | ns | |||
处理 Treatment | 丰两优4号 Fengliangyou 4 | ||||||||
2022 | 2023 | ||||||||
齐穗期 Full heading | 灌浆中期 Mid-filling | 成熟期 Maturity | 齐穗期 Full heading | 灌浆中期 Mid-filling | 成熟期 Maturity | ||||
N0D1 | 0.55±0.01 d | 0.70±0.02 a | 0.92±0.02 a | 0.56a±0.01 bc | 0.72±0.02 a | 0.93±0.02 a | |||
N0D2 | 0.51±0.02 d | 0.61±0.02 c | 0.85±0.03 b | 0.53±0.02 c | 0.61±0.02 c | 0.83±0.03 b | |||
N0D3 | 0.59±0.01 bc | 0.69±0.01 a | 0.92±0.01 a | 0.60±0.01 b | 0.69±0.01 a | 0.89±0.01 a | |||
平均Mean | 0.55 | 0.66 | 0.90 | 0.56 | 0.67 | 0.88 | |||
N1D1 | 0.56±0.01 cd | 0.62±0.01 c | 0.71±0.01 d | 0.58±0.01 b | 0.66±0.01 b | 0.74±0.01 cd | |||
N1D2 | 0.60±0.02 bc | 0.64±0.02 bc | 0.73±0.02 cd | 0.65±0.02 a | 0.67±0.02 b | 0.77±0.02 c | |||
N1D3 | 0.63±0.01 ab | 0.66±0.01 bc | 0.76±0.01 cd | 0.66±0.01 a | 0.69±0.01 a | 0.79±0.01 bc | |||
平均Mean | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.74 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.76 | |||
N2D1 | 0.59±0.02 bc | 0.63±0.01 c | 0.72±0.02 cd | 0.60±0.02 b | 0.64±0.02 b | 0.73±0.02 d | |||
N2D2 | 0.63±0.02 ab | 0.65±0.02 bc | 0.74±0.02 cd | 0.65±0.02 a | 0.67±0.02 b | 0.77±0.02 c | |||
N2D3 | 0.65±0.02 a | 0.68±0.02 ab | 0.77±0.02 c | 0.65±0.02 a | 0.68±0.02 ab | 0.78±0.02 bc | |||
平均Mean | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.74 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.76 | |||
F值 F value | 10.36 | 4.33 | 20.53 | 10.64 | 4.14 | 13.05 | |||
施氮量 N rate(N) | ** | ns | ** | ** | ns | ** | |||
密度 Density(D) | ** | ** | * | * | * | ns | |||
施氮量×密度N×D | * | * | ns | * | ** | * |
表4 施氮量与移栽密度对小粒杂交稻叶片不同时期粒叶比的影响
Table 4. Effect of nitrogen application and transplanting density on grain to leaf ratio of small-seed hybrid rice at different growing stages grain/cm2
处理 Treatment | 卓两优0985 Zhuoliangyou 0985 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2022 | 2023 | ||||||||
齐穗期 Full heading | 灌浆中期 Mid-filling | 成熟期 Maturity | 齐穗期 Full heading | 灌浆中期 Mid-filling | 成熟期 Maturity | ||||
N0D1 | 0.97±0.01 a | 0.99±0.01 ab | 1.37±0.06 a | 1.03±0.02 a | 1.06±0.02 a | 1.43±0.03 a | |||
N0D2 | 0.87±0.01 c | 0.94±0.01 c | 1.21±0.03 b | 0.92±0.03 c | 0.97±0.03 b | 1.28±0.04 b | |||
N0D3 | 0.96±0.01 a | 1.00±0.04 a | 1.30±0.06 ab | 1.02±0.02 ab | 0.99±0.02 b | 1.37±0.02 a | |||
平均Mean | 0.93 | 0.98 | 1.29 | 0.99 | 1.01 | 1.36 | |||
N1D1 | 0.88±0.01 bc | 0.95±0.01 bc | 1.12±0.03 bc | 0.94±0.02 bc | 1.01±0.02 ab | 1.18±0.02 c | |||
N1D2 | 0.91±0.01 b | 0.97±0.01 bc | 1.13±0.03 bc | 0.96±0.02 bc | 1.01±0.03 ab | 1.19±0.03 c | |||
N1D3 | 0.91±0.01 b | 0.97±0.01 bc | 1.17±0.01 bc | 0.95±0.02 bc | 1.00±0.02 ab | 1.21±0.02 bc | |||
平均Mean | 0.90 | 0.96 | 1.14 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 1.19 | |||
N2D1 | 0.88±0.01 bc | 0.93±0.01 c | 1.09±0.01 c | 0.95±0.03 bc | 1.00±0.031 ab | 1.18±0.04 c | |||
N2D2 | 0.88±0.01 bc | 0.95±0.01 bc | 1.09±0.02 c | 0.94±0.02 bc | 1.01±0.025 ab | 1.15±0.03 c | |||
N2D3 | 0.92±0.02 b | 0.97±0.01 bc | 1.14±0.01 bc | 0.94±0.02 bc | 0.98±0.023 ab | 1.14±0.03 c | |||
平均Mean | 0.89 | 0.95 | 1.11 | 0.94 | 1.00 | 1.16 | |||
F值 F value | 9.2 | 3.76 | 8.62 | 3.02 | 1.17 | 12.48 | |||
施氮量 N rate(N) | ** | * | ** | * | ns | ** | |||
密度 Density(D) | * | * | ns | ns | ns | ns | |||
施氮量×密度N×D | ** | ns | ns | * | ns | ns | |||
处理 Treatment | 丰两优4号 Fengliangyou 4 | ||||||||
2022 | 2023 | ||||||||
齐穗期 Full heading | 灌浆中期 Mid-filling | 成熟期 Maturity | 齐穗期 Full heading | 灌浆中期 Mid-filling | 成熟期 Maturity | ||||
N0D1 | 0.55±0.01 d | 0.70±0.02 a | 0.92±0.02 a | 0.56a±0.01 bc | 0.72±0.02 a | 0.93±0.02 a | |||
N0D2 | 0.51±0.02 d | 0.61±0.02 c | 0.85±0.03 b | 0.53±0.02 c | 0.61±0.02 c | 0.83±0.03 b | |||
N0D3 | 0.59±0.01 bc | 0.69±0.01 a | 0.92±0.01 a | 0.60±0.01 b | 0.69±0.01 a | 0.89±0.01 a | |||
平均Mean | 0.55 | 0.66 | 0.90 | 0.56 | 0.67 | 0.88 | |||
N1D1 | 0.56±0.01 cd | 0.62±0.01 c | 0.71±0.01 d | 0.58±0.01 b | 0.66±0.01 b | 0.74±0.01 cd | |||
N1D2 | 0.60±0.02 bc | 0.64±0.02 bc | 0.73±0.02 cd | 0.65±0.02 a | 0.67±0.02 b | 0.77±0.02 c | |||
N1D3 | 0.63±0.01 ab | 0.66±0.01 bc | 0.76±0.01 cd | 0.66±0.01 a | 0.69±0.01 a | 0.79±0.01 bc | |||
平均Mean | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.74 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.76 | |||
N2D1 | 0.59±0.02 bc | 0.63±0.01 c | 0.72±0.02 cd | 0.60±0.02 b | 0.64±0.02 b | 0.73±0.02 d | |||
N2D2 | 0.63±0.02 ab | 0.65±0.02 bc | 0.74±0.02 cd | 0.65±0.02 a | 0.67±0.02 b | 0.77±0.02 c | |||
N2D3 | 0.65±0.02 a | 0.68±0.02 ab | 0.77±0.02 c | 0.65±0.02 a | 0.68±0.02 ab | 0.78±0.02 bc | |||
平均Mean | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.74 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.76 | |||
F值 F value | 10.36 | 4.33 | 20.53 | 10.64 | 4.14 | 13.05 | |||
施氮量 N rate(N) | ** | ns | ** | ** | ns | ** | |||
密度 Density(D) | ** | ** | * | * | * | ns | |||
施氮量×密度N×D | * | * | ns | * | ** | * |
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 2022 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
分蘖期 Tillering | 孕穗期 Booting | 齐穗期 Full heading | 灌浆中期 Mid-filling | 成熟期 Maturity | ||
卓两优0985 Zhuoliangyou 0985 | N0D1 | 2.27±0.12 b | 4.54±0.24 b | 6.36±0.34 b | 7.81±0.41 b | 9.08±0.48 b |
N0D2 | 2.18±0.09 b | 4.35±0.18 b | 6.09±0.25 b | 7.48±0.30 b | 8.70±0.35 b | |
N0D3 | 2.11±0.12 b | 4.22±0.25 b | 5.91±0.35 b | 7.26±0.42 b | 8.44±0.49 b | |
平均Mean | 2.19 | 4.37 | 6.12 | 7.52 | 8.74 | |
N1D1 | 3.62±0.22 a | 7.23±0.44 a | 10.12±0.62 a | 12.44±0.76 a | 14.46±0.88 a | |
N1D2 | 3.65±0.18 a | 7.30±0.35 a | 10.22±0.49 a | 12.56±0.61 a | 14.60±0.71 a | |
N1D3 | 3.51±0.19 a | 7.01±0.39 a | 9.81±0.54 a | 12.06±0.66 a | 14.02±0.77 a | |
平均Mean | 3.59 | 7.18 | 10.05 | 12.35 | 14.36 | |
N2D1 | 3.86±0.14 a | 7.72±0.34 a | 10.80±0.39 a | 13.27±0.49 a | 15.43±0.56 a | |
N2D2 | 3.81±0.17 a | 7.63±0.28 a | 10.68±0.48 a | 13.12±0.59 a | 15.25±0.69 a | |
N2D3 | 3.75±0.17 a | 7.51±0.34 a | 10.51±0.48 a | 12.91±0.59 a | 15.01±0.68 a | |
平均Mean | 3.81 | 7.62 | 10.66 | 13.10 | 15.23 | |
F值F value | 22.44 | 22.53 | 22.47 | 22.50 | 22.49 | |
施氮量 N rate(N) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
密度 Density(D) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
施氮量×密度N×D | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
丰两优4号 | N0D1 | 2.07±0.11 b | 4.15±0.33 b | 6.22±0.39 b | 7.38±0.33 b | 8.29±0.44 b |
Fengliangyou 4 | N0D2 | 2.02±0.08 b | 4.04±0.24 b | 6.05±0.29 b | 7.18±0.24 b | 8.07±0.33 b |
N0D3 | 1.96±0.11 b | 3.91±0.34 b | 5.87±0.41 b | 6.96±0.34 b | 7.82±0.46 b | |
平均Mean | 2.02 | 4.03 | 6.05 | 7.17 | 8.06 | |
N1D1 | 3.93±0.24 a | 7.86±0.72 a | 11.78±0.85 a | 13.98±0.72 a | 15.71±0.96 a | |
N1D2 | 3.99±0.19 a | 7.98±0.58 a | 11.97±0.69 a | 14.20±0.60 a | 15.96±0.77 a | |
N1D3 | 4.02±0.22 a | 8.04±0.66 a | 12.05±0.78 a | 14.30±0.66 a | 16.07±0.89 a | |
平均Mean | 3.98 | 7.96 | 11.93 | 14.16 | 15.91 | |
N2D1 | 4.10±0.15 a | 8.21±0.44 a | 12.31±0.53 a | 14.60±0.44 a | 16.41±0.59 a | |
N2D2 | 4.34±0.20 a | 8.68±0.59 a | 13.01±0..68 a | 15.44±0.59 a | 17.35±0.78 a | |
N2D3 | 4.18±0.18 a | 8.36±0.53 a | 12.54±0.70 a | 14.88±0.60 a | 16.72±0.76 a | |
平均Mean | 4.21 | 8.41 | 12.62 | 14.98 | 16.83 | |
F值 F value | 35.94 | 35.97 | 36.85 | 35.47 | 36.12 | |
施氮量 N rate(N) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
密度 Density(D) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
施氮量×密度N×D | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 2023 | ||||
分蘖期 Tillering | 孕穗期 Booting | 齐穗期 Full heading | 灌浆中期 Mid-filling | 成熟期 Maturity | ||
卓两优0985 Zhuoliangyou 0985 | N0D1 | 2.32±0.12 b | 4.59±0.24 b | 6.67±0.35 b | 9.02±0.48 b | 9.71±0.51 b |
N0D2 | 2.23±0.09 b | 4.41±0.18 b | 6.40±0.25 b | 8.64±0.35 b | 9.25±0.37 b | |
N0D3 | 2.14±0.13 b | 4.31±0.25 b | 6.21±0.37 b | 8.43±0.49 b | 8.74±0.51 b | |
平均Mean | 2.23 | 4.44 | 6.44 | 8.70 | 9.22 | |
N1D1 | 3.75±0.23 a | 7.32±0.45 a | 10.64±0.62 a | 13.58±0.83 a | 16.21±0.99 a | |
N1D2 | 3.72±0.18 a | 7.38±0.36 a | 10.73±0.49 a | 13.81±0.67 a | 16.65±0.81 a | |
N1D3 | 3.61±0.20 a | 7.12±0.39 a | 10.33±0.54 a | 13.24±0.73 a | 15.47±0.85 a | |
平均Mean | 3.69 | 7.27 | 10.56 | 13.54 | 16.11 | |
N2D1 | 3.96±0.14 a | 7.88±0.24 a | 11.35±0.39 a | 14.29±0.52 a | 16.93±0.61 a | |
N2D2 | 3.89±0.18 a | 7.64±0.34 a | 11.22±0.48 a | 14.28±0.64 a | 17.36±0.78 a | |
N2D3 | 3.81±0.17 a | 7.58±0.35 a | 11.03±0.49 a | 14.02±0.66 a | 16.32±0.75 a | |
平均Mean | 3.89 | 7.70 | 11.19 | 14.20 | 17.01 | |
F值F value | 22.68 | 22.26 | 22.50 | 18.2 | 26.44 | |
施氮量 N rate(N) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
密度 Density(D) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
施氮量×密度N×D | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
丰两优4号 | N0D1 | 2.11±0.11 b | 4.21±0.22 b | 6.69±0.35 b | 8.41±0.45 b | 8.75±0.46 b |
Fengliangyou 4 | N0D2 | 2.05±0.08 b | 4.12±0.17 b | 6.52±0.26 b | 8.25±0.33 b | 8.53±0.34 b |
N0D3 | 1.98±0.12 b | 4.02±0.23 b | 6.30±0.37 b | 8.05±0.47 b | 8.05±0.47 b | |
平均Mean | 2.05 | 4.12 | 6.52 | 8.24 | 8.44 | |
N1D1 | 4.01±0.25 a | 8.05±0.49 a | 12.66±0.77 a | 15.12±0.92 a | 17.44±1.06 a | |
N1D2 | 3.98±0.19 a | 8.01±0.40 a | 12.84±0.64 a | 15.31±0.77 a | 18.12±0.90 a | |
N1D3 | 3.86±0.21 a | 7.88±0.39 a | 12.93±0.71 a | 15.65±1.09 a | 17.89±0.95 a | |
平均Mean | 3.95 | 7.98 | 12.83 | 15.36 | 17.81 | |
N2D1 | 4.15±0.15 a | 8.29±0.43 a | 13.21±0.48 a | 15.85±0.57 a | 18.06±0.65 a | |
N2D2 | 4.34±0.20 a | 8.78±0.30 a | 14.00±0.63 a | 16.14±0.72 a | 19.56±0.88 a | |
N2D3 | 4.23±0.19 a | 8.44±00.39 a | 13.50±0.62 a | 16.04±0.74 a | 18.45±0.84 a | |
平均Mean | 4.24 | 8.50 | 13.54 | 16.01 | 18.70 | |
F值 F value | 35.08 | 34.73 | 35.73 | 26.08 | 40.69 | |
施氮量 N rate(N) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
密度 Density(D) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
施氮量×密度N×D | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
表5 施氮量与移栽密度对小粒杂交稻干物质积累的影响
Table 5. Effect of nitrogen application and transplanting density on dry matter accumulation of rice in each treatment t/hm2
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 2022 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
分蘖期 Tillering | 孕穗期 Booting | 齐穗期 Full heading | 灌浆中期 Mid-filling | 成熟期 Maturity | ||
卓两优0985 Zhuoliangyou 0985 | N0D1 | 2.27±0.12 b | 4.54±0.24 b | 6.36±0.34 b | 7.81±0.41 b | 9.08±0.48 b |
N0D2 | 2.18±0.09 b | 4.35±0.18 b | 6.09±0.25 b | 7.48±0.30 b | 8.70±0.35 b | |
N0D3 | 2.11±0.12 b | 4.22±0.25 b | 5.91±0.35 b | 7.26±0.42 b | 8.44±0.49 b | |
平均Mean | 2.19 | 4.37 | 6.12 | 7.52 | 8.74 | |
N1D1 | 3.62±0.22 a | 7.23±0.44 a | 10.12±0.62 a | 12.44±0.76 a | 14.46±0.88 a | |
N1D2 | 3.65±0.18 a | 7.30±0.35 a | 10.22±0.49 a | 12.56±0.61 a | 14.60±0.71 a | |
N1D3 | 3.51±0.19 a | 7.01±0.39 a | 9.81±0.54 a | 12.06±0.66 a | 14.02±0.77 a | |
平均Mean | 3.59 | 7.18 | 10.05 | 12.35 | 14.36 | |
N2D1 | 3.86±0.14 a | 7.72±0.34 a | 10.80±0.39 a | 13.27±0.49 a | 15.43±0.56 a | |
N2D2 | 3.81±0.17 a | 7.63±0.28 a | 10.68±0.48 a | 13.12±0.59 a | 15.25±0.69 a | |
N2D3 | 3.75±0.17 a | 7.51±0.34 a | 10.51±0.48 a | 12.91±0.59 a | 15.01±0.68 a | |
平均Mean | 3.81 | 7.62 | 10.66 | 13.10 | 15.23 | |
F值F value | 22.44 | 22.53 | 22.47 | 22.50 | 22.49 | |
施氮量 N rate(N) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
密度 Density(D) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
施氮量×密度N×D | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
丰两优4号 | N0D1 | 2.07±0.11 b | 4.15±0.33 b | 6.22±0.39 b | 7.38±0.33 b | 8.29±0.44 b |
Fengliangyou 4 | N0D2 | 2.02±0.08 b | 4.04±0.24 b | 6.05±0.29 b | 7.18±0.24 b | 8.07±0.33 b |
N0D3 | 1.96±0.11 b | 3.91±0.34 b | 5.87±0.41 b | 6.96±0.34 b | 7.82±0.46 b | |
平均Mean | 2.02 | 4.03 | 6.05 | 7.17 | 8.06 | |
N1D1 | 3.93±0.24 a | 7.86±0.72 a | 11.78±0.85 a | 13.98±0.72 a | 15.71±0.96 a | |
N1D2 | 3.99±0.19 a | 7.98±0.58 a | 11.97±0.69 a | 14.20±0.60 a | 15.96±0.77 a | |
N1D3 | 4.02±0.22 a | 8.04±0.66 a | 12.05±0.78 a | 14.30±0.66 a | 16.07±0.89 a | |
平均Mean | 3.98 | 7.96 | 11.93 | 14.16 | 15.91 | |
N2D1 | 4.10±0.15 a | 8.21±0.44 a | 12.31±0.53 a | 14.60±0.44 a | 16.41±0.59 a | |
N2D2 | 4.34±0.20 a | 8.68±0.59 a | 13.01±0..68 a | 15.44±0.59 a | 17.35±0.78 a | |
N2D3 | 4.18±0.18 a | 8.36±0.53 a | 12.54±0.70 a | 14.88±0.60 a | 16.72±0.76 a | |
平均Mean | 4.21 | 8.41 | 12.62 | 14.98 | 16.83 | |
F值 F value | 35.94 | 35.97 | 36.85 | 35.47 | 36.12 | |
施氮量 N rate(N) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
密度 Density(D) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
施氮量×密度N×D | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 2023 | ||||
分蘖期 Tillering | 孕穗期 Booting | 齐穗期 Full heading | 灌浆中期 Mid-filling | 成熟期 Maturity | ||
卓两优0985 Zhuoliangyou 0985 | N0D1 | 2.32±0.12 b | 4.59±0.24 b | 6.67±0.35 b | 9.02±0.48 b | 9.71±0.51 b |
N0D2 | 2.23±0.09 b | 4.41±0.18 b | 6.40±0.25 b | 8.64±0.35 b | 9.25±0.37 b | |
N0D3 | 2.14±0.13 b | 4.31±0.25 b | 6.21±0.37 b | 8.43±0.49 b | 8.74±0.51 b | |
平均Mean | 2.23 | 4.44 | 6.44 | 8.70 | 9.22 | |
N1D1 | 3.75±0.23 a | 7.32±0.45 a | 10.64±0.62 a | 13.58±0.83 a | 16.21±0.99 a | |
N1D2 | 3.72±0.18 a | 7.38±0.36 a | 10.73±0.49 a | 13.81±0.67 a | 16.65±0.81 a | |
N1D3 | 3.61±0.20 a | 7.12±0.39 a | 10.33±0.54 a | 13.24±0.73 a | 15.47±0.85 a | |
平均Mean | 3.69 | 7.27 | 10.56 | 13.54 | 16.11 | |
N2D1 | 3.96±0.14 a | 7.88±0.24 a | 11.35±0.39 a | 14.29±0.52 a | 16.93±0.61 a | |
N2D2 | 3.89±0.18 a | 7.64±0.34 a | 11.22±0.48 a | 14.28±0.64 a | 17.36±0.78 a | |
N2D3 | 3.81±0.17 a | 7.58±0.35 a | 11.03±0.49 a | 14.02±0.66 a | 16.32±0.75 a | |
平均Mean | 3.89 | 7.70 | 11.19 | 14.20 | 17.01 | |
F值F value | 22.68 | 22.26 | 22.50 | 18.2 | 26.44 | |
施氮量 N rate(N) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
密度 Density(D) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
施氮量×密度N×D | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
丰两优4号 | N0D1 | 2.11±0.11 b | 4.21±0.22 b | 6.69±0.35 b | 8.41±0.45 b | 8.75±0.46 b |
Fengliangyou 4 | N0D2 | 2.05±0.08 b | 4.12±0.17 b | 6.52±0.26 b | 8.25±0.33 b | 8.53±0.34 b |
N0D3 | 1.98±0.12 b | 4.02±0.23 b | 6.30±0.37 b | 8.05±0.47 b | 8.05±0.47 b | |
平均Mean | 2.05 | 4.12 | 6.52 | 8.24 | 8.44 | |
N1D1 | 4.01±0.25 a | 8.05±0.49 a | 12.66±0.77 a | 15.12±0.92 a | 17.44±1.06 a | |
N1D2 | 3.98±0.19 a | 8.01±0.40 a | 12.84±0.64 a | 15.31±0.77 a | 18.12±0.90 a | |
N1D3 | 3.86±0.21 a | 7.88±0.39 a | 12.93±0.71 a | 15.65±1.09 a | 17.89±0.95 a | |
平均Mean | 3.95 | 7.98 | 12.83 | 15.36 | 17.81 | |
N2D1 | 4.15±0.15 a | 8.29±0.43 a | 13.21±0.48 a | 15.85±0.57 a | 18.06±0.65 a | |
N2D2 | 4.34±0.20 a | 8.78±0.30 a | 14.00±0.63 a | 16.14±0.72 a | 19.56±0.88 a | |
N2D3 | 4.23±0.19 a | 8.44±00.39 a | 13.50±0.62 a | 16.04±0.74 a | 18.45±0.84 a | |
平均Mean | 4.24 | 8.50 | 13.54 | 16.01 | 18.70 | |
F值 F value | 35.08 | 34.73 | 35.73 | 26.08 | 40.69 | |
施氮量 N rate(N) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
密度 Density(D) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
施氮量×密度N×D | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 茎鞘干质量 Dry weight of stems (t/hm2) | 茎鞘物质 输出率 Dry matter output rate of stem and sheath (%) | 茎鞘物质 转换率 Conversion rate of stem and sheath matter (%) | 叶片干重 Dry weight of leaves (t/hm2) | 茎鞘物质 输出率 Dry matter output rate of stem and sheath (%) | 茎鞘物质 转换率 Conversion rate of stem and sheath matter (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
齐穗期 Full heading | 成熟期 Maturity | 齐穗期 Full heading | 成熟期 Maturity | ||||||
卓两优0985 Zhuoliangyou 0985 | N0D1 | 4.08±0.22 b | 2.96±0.16 c | 27.45±1.45 b | 21.88±1.16 bc | 1.63±0.08 b | 1.00±0.05 b | 38.65±2.05 a | 12.30±0.65 bc |
N0D2 | 3.90±0.16 b | 2.61±0.11 c | 33.08±1.34 a | 25.34±1.02 a | 1.56±0.06 b | 1.00±0.04 b | 35.90±1.45 b | 11.00±0.44 c | |
N0D3 | 3.78±0.22 b | 2.97±0.17 c | 21.43±0.26 c | 17.72±1.04 c | 1.52±0.09 b | 0.90±0.05 b | 40.79±2.39 a | 13.57±0.80 ab | |
平均Mean | 3.93 | 2.85 | 27.48 | 21.93 | 1.57 | 0.97 | 38.22 | 12.18 | |
N1D1 | 6.50±0.40 a | 5.11±0.31 ab | 21.38±1.31 c | 17.77±1.09 c | 2.59±0.16 a | 1.53±0.09 a | 40.93±2.50 a | 13.55±0.83 ab | |
N1D2 | 6.55±0.33 a | 4.73±0.24 ab | 27.79±0.39 b | 22.06±1.10 bc | 2.62±0.13 a | 1.62±0.08 a | 38.17±1.91 a | 12.12±0.60 bc | |
N1D3 | 6.30±0.35 a | 4.48±0.25 ab | 28.89±1.59 b | 22.81±1.26 bc | 2.52±0.14 a | 1.56±0.09 a | 38.10±2.10 a | 12.03±0.66 bc | |
平均Mean | 6.45 | 4.77 | 26.05 | 20.95 | 2.58 | 1.57 | 39.15 | 12.60 | |
N2D1 | 6.93±0.25 a | 5.40±0.20 a | 22.08±0.79 c | 19.08±0.69 c | 2.77±0.09 a | 1.56±0.06 a | 43.68±1.57 a | 15.18±0.55 a | |
N2D2 | 6.85±0.31 a | 5.29±0.24 a | 22.7±1.03 c | 18.73±0.84 c | 2.74±0.12 a | 1.63±0.07 a | 40.51±1.83 a | 13.33±0.60 ab | |
N2D3 | 6.73±0.30 a | 5.38±0.25 a | 20.06±0.92 c | 16.77±0.76 c | 2.69±0.12 a | 1.58±0.07 a | 41.26±1.89 a | 13.79±0.64 ab | |
平均Mean | 6.83 | 5.36 | 21.64 | 18.19 | 2.73 | 1.59 | 41.76 | 14.05 | |
F值F value | 22.47 | 27.66 | 12.54 | 8.14 | 22.32 | 19.73 | 1.32 | 3.64 | |
施氮量N rate(N) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ns | ** | |
密度Density(D) | ns | ns | ** | ** | ns | ns | ns | * | |
施氮量×密度N×D | ns | ns | ** | ** | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
丰两优4号 Fengliangyou 4 | N0D1 | 4.06±0.21 b | 3.11±0.16 c | 23.40±1.24 b | 21.94±1.16 b | 1.45±0.07 b | 0.94±0.05 b | 35.17±1.86 a | 11.78±0.62 b |
N0D2 | 3.95±0.16 b | 3.03±0.12 c | 23.29±0.94 b | 21.80±0.88 b | 1.41±0.06 b | 0.92±0.04 b | 34.75±1.40 a | 11.61±0.47 b | |
N0D3 | 3.81±0.22 b | 2.78±0.16 c | 27.03±1.58 a | 25.18±1.48 a | 1.37±0.08 b | 0.89±0.05 b | 35.04±2.05 a | 11.74±0.69 b | |
平均Mean | 3.95 | 2.96 | 25.06 | 23.49 | 1.41 | 0.92 | 34.75 | 11.62 | |
N1D1 | 7.67±0.47 a | 6.19±0.38 b | 19.30±1.18 cd | 18.93±1.16 c | 2.74±0.17 a | 1.70±0.10 a | 37.96±2.32 a | 13.30±0.81 a | |
N1D2 | 7.78±0.39 a | 5.94±0.30 b | 23.65±1.18 b | 22.36±1.12 ab | 2.78±0.14 a | 1.79±0.09 a | 35.61±1.78 a | 12.03±0.60 b | |
N1D3 | 7.84±0.43 a | 6.32±0.35 ab | 19.39±1.07 cd | 18.98±1.05 c | 2.80±0.15 a | 1.74±0.06 a | 37.86±2.09 a | 13.23±0.73 ab | |
平均Mean | 7.78 | 6.15 | 20.95 | 20.33 | 2.77 | 1.74 | 37.18 | 12.85 | |
N2D1 | 8.01±0.29 a | 6.79±0.25 ab | 15.23±0.55 d | 15.44±0.56 cd | 2.86±0.10 a | 1.72±0.06 a | 39.86±1.76 a | 14.43±0.52 a | |
N2D2 | 8.48±0.38 a | 7.01±0.32 a | 17.33±0.78 d | 17.31±0.78 c | 3.03±0.14 a | 1.85±0.08 a | 38.94±1.71 a | 13.90±0.63 a | |
N2D3 | 8.18±0.37 a | 6.49±0.30 ab | 20.66±0.95 bc | 20.12±0.92 bc | 2.92±0.15 a | 1.83±0.08 a | 37.33±1.76 a | 12.98±0.59 ab | |
平均Mean | 8.20 | 6.77 | 17.44 | 17.30 | 2.93 | 1.80 | 38.57 | 13.67 | |
F值 F value | 35.75 | 42.19 | 11.26 | 7.98 | 35.59 | 31.82 | 1.02 | 2.61 | |
施氮量 N rate(N) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ns | * | |
密度 Density(D) | ns | ns | ** | ** | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
施氮量×密度N×D | ns | ns | ** | ** | ns | ns | ns | ns |
表6 2022年施氮量与移栽密度对小粒杂交稻物质转运的影响
Table 6. Effect of nitrogen application and transplanting density on matter transport of rice in 2022
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 茎鞘干质量 Dry weight of stems (t/hm2) | 茎鞘物质 输出率 Dry matter output rate of stem and sheath (%) | 茎鞘物质 转换率 Conversion rate of stem and sheath matter (%) | 叶片干重 Dry weight of leaves (t/hm2) | 茎鞘物质 输出率 Dry matter output rate of stem and sheath (%) | 茎鞘物质 转换率 Conversion rate of stem and sheath matter (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
齐穗期 Full heading | 成熟期 Maturity | 齐穗期 Full heading | 成熟期 Maturity | ||||||
卓两优0985 Zhuoliangyou 0985 | N0D1 | 4.08±0.22 b | 2.96±0.16 c | 27.45±1.45 b | 21.88±1.16 bc | 1.63±0.08 b | 1.00±0.05 b | 38.65±2.05 a | 12.30±0.65 bc |
N0D2 | 3.90±0.16 b | 2.61±0.11 c | 33.08±1.34 a | 25.34±1.02 a | 1.56±0.06 b | 1.00±0.04 b | 35.90±1.45 b | 11.00±0.44 c | |
N0D3 | 3.78±0.22 b | 2.97±0.17 c | 21.43±0.26 c | 17.72±1.04 c | 1.52±0.09 b | 0.90±0.05 b | 40.79±2.39 a | 13.57±0.80 ab | |
平均Mean | 3.93 | 2.85 | 27.48 | 21.93 | 1.57 | 0.97 | 38.22 | 12.18 | |
N1D1 | 6.50±0.40 a | 5.11±0.31 ab | 21.38±1.31 c | 17.77±1.09 c | 2.59±0.16 a | 1.53±0.09 a | 40.93±2.50 a | 13.55±0.83 ab | |
N1D2 | 6.55±0.33 a | 4.73±0.24 ab | 27.79±0.39 b | 22.06±1.10 bc | 2.62±0.13 a | 1.62±0.08 a | 38.17±1.91 a | 12.12±0.60 bc | |
N1D3 | 6.30±0.35 a | 4.48±0.25 ab | 28.89±1.59 b | 22.81±1.26 bc | 2.52±0.14 a | 1.56±0.09 a | 38.10±2.10 a | 12.03±0.66 bc | |
平均Mean | 6.45 | 4.77 | 26.05 | 20.95 | 2.58 | 1.57 | 39.15 | 12.60 | |
N2D1 | 6.93±0.25 a | 5.40±0.20 a | 22.08±0.79 c | 19.08±0.69 c | 2.77±0.09 a | 1.56±0.06 a | 43.68±1.57 a | 15.18±0.55 a | |
N2D2 | 6.85±0.31 a | 5.29±0.24 a | 22.7±1.03 c | 18.73±0.84 c | 2.74±0.12 a | 1.63±0.07 a | 40.51±1.83 a | 13.33±0.60 ab | |
N2D3 | 6.73±0.30 a | 5.38±0.25 a | 20.06±0.92 c | 16.77±0.76 c | 2.69±0.12 a | 1.58±0.07 a | 41.26±1.89 a | 13.79±0.64 ab | |
平均Mean | 6.83 | 5.36 | 21.64 | 18.19 | 2.73 | 1.59 | 41.76 | 14.05 | |
F值F value | 22.47 | 27.66 | 12.54 | 8.14 | 22.32 | 19.73 | 1.32 | 3.64 | |
施氮量N rate(N) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ns | ** | |
密度Density(D) | ns | ns | ** | ** | ns | ns | ns | * | |
施氮量×密度N×D | ns | ns | ** | ** | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
丰两优4号 Fengliangyou 4 | N0D1 | 4.06±0.21 b | 3.11±0.16 c | 23.40±1.24 b | 21.94±1.16 b | 1.45±0.07 b | 0.94±0.05 b | 35.17±1.86 a | 11.78±0.62 b |
N0D2 | 3.95±0.16 b | 3.03±0.12 c | 23.29±0.94 b | 21.80±0.88 b | 1.41±0.06 b | 0.92±0.04 b | 34.75±1.40 a | 11.61±0.47 b | |
N0D3 | 3.81±0.22 b | 2.78±0.16 c | 27.03±1.58 a | 25.18±1.48 a | 1.37±0.08 b | 0.89±0.05 b | 35.04±2.05 a | 11.74±0.69 b | |
平均Mean | 3.95 | 2.96 | 25.06 | 23.49 | 1.41 | 0.92 | 34.75 | 11.62 | |
N1D1 | 7.67±0.47 a | 6.19±0.38 b | 19.30±1.18 cd | 18.93±1.16 c | 2.74±0.17 a | 1.70±0.10 a | 37.96±2.32 a | 13.30±0.81 a | |
N1D2 | 7.78±0.39 a | 5.94±0.30 b | 23.65±1.18 b | 22.36±1.12 ab | 2.78±0.14 a | 1.79±0.09 a | 35.61±1.78 a | 12.03±0.60 b | |
N1D3 | 7.84±0.43 a | 6.32±0.35 ab | 19.39±1.07 cd | 18.98±1.05 c | 2.80±0.15 a | 1.74±0.06 a | 37.86±2.09 a | 13.23±0.73 ab | |
平均Mean | 7.78 | 6.15 | 20.95 | 20.33 | 2.77 | 1.74 | 37.18 | 12.85 | |
N2D1 | 8.01±0.29 a | 6.79±0.25 ab | 15.23±0.55 d | 15.44±0.56 cd | 2.86±0.10 a | 1.72±0.06 a | 39.86±1.76 a | 14.43±0.52 a | |
N2D2 | 8.48±0.38 a | 7.01±0.32 a | 17.33±0.78 d | 17.31±0.78 c | 3.03±0.14 a | 1.85±0.08 a | 38.94±1.71 a | 13.90±0.63 a | |
N2D3 | 8.18±0.37 a | 6.49±0.30 ab | 20.66±0.95 bc | 20.12±0.92 bc | 2.92±0.15 a | 1.83±0.08 a | 37.33±1.76 a | 12.98±0.59 ab | |
平均Mean | 8.20 | 6.77 | 17.44 | 17.30 | 2.93 | 1.80 | 38.57 | 13.67 | |
F值 F value | 35.75 | 42.19 | 11.26 | 7.98 | 35.59 | 31.82 | 1.02 | 2.61 | |
施氮量 N rate(N) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ns | * | |
密度 Density(D) | ns | ns | ** | ** | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
施氮量×密度N×D | ns | ns | ** | ** | ns | ns | ns | ns |
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 茎鞘干质量 Dry weight of stems (t/hm2) | 茎鞘物质 输出率 Dry matter output rate of stem and sheath (%) | 茎鞘物质 转换率 Conversion rate of stem and sheath matter (%) | 叶片干质量 Dry weight of leaves (t/hm2) | 茎鞘物质 输出率 Dry matter output rate of stem and sheath (%) | 茎鞘物质 转换率 Conversion rate of stem and sheath matter (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
齐穗期 Full heading | 成熟期 Maturity | 齐穗期 Full heading | 成熟期 Maturity | ||||||
卓两优0985 Zhuoliangyou 0985 | N0D1 | 4.28±0.23 b | 3.11±0.16 c | 27.34±1.45 a | 21.08±1.11 ab | 1.71±0.09 b | 1.05±0.05 b | 38.68±2.05 ab | 11.93±0.63 bc |
N0D2 | 4.10±0.17 b | 2.86±0.12 c | 30.24±1.22 a | 23.22±0.94 a | 1.64±0.07 b | 1.05±0.04 b | 35.93±1.45 b | 11.02±0.45 c | |
N0D3 | 3.97±0.22 b | 3.06±0.18 c | 22.92±1.34 bc | 19.20±1.13 b | 1.60±0.09 b | 0.94±0.06 b | 40.82±2.39 ab | 13.75±0.81 a | |
平均Mean | 4.13 | 2.99 | 27.60 | 21.88 | 1.65 | 1.02 | 38.25 | 12.11 | |
N1D1 | 6.83±0.42 a | 5.36±0.33 ab | 21.52±1.31 bc | 15.91±0.97 c | 2.72±0.17 a | 1.61±0.10 a | 40.96±2.50 ab | 12.06±0.74 bc | |
N1D2 | 6.88±0.34 a | 4.97±0.25 b | 27.76±1.39 a | 19.14±0.96 b | 2.75±0.14 a | 1.70±0.09 a | 38.20±1.91 ab | 10.53±0.53 c | |
N1D3 | 6.62±0.36 a | 4.70±0.26 b | 29.00±1.60 a | 21.03±1.16 ab | 2.65±0.15 a | 1.64±0.09 a | 38.13±2.10 ab | 11.05±0.61 bc | |
平均Mean | 6.77 | 5.01 | 26.00 | 18.62 | 2.71 | 1.65 | 39.18 | 11.23 | |
N2D1 | 7.28±0.26 a | 5.79±0.21 a | 20.47±0.74 c | 15.68±0.57 c | 2.91±0.10 a | 1.64±0.06 a | 43.71±1.58 a | 13.39±0.48 a | |
N2D2 | 7.19±0.32 a | 5.55±0.25 ab | 22.81±1.03 bc | 16.24±0.73 c | 2.88±0.13 a | 1.71±0.08 a | 40.54±1.83 ab | 11.55±0.52 bc | |
N2D3 | 7.07±0.32 a | 5.65±0.26 ab | 20.08±0.92 c | 15.76±0.71 c | 2.83±0.14 a | 1.66±0.07 a | 41.30±1.89 ab | 12.95±0.59 ab | |
平均Mean | 7.17 | 5.80 | 19.11 | 14.36 | 2.87 | 1.67 | 41.79 | 12.56 | |
F值 F value | 22.48 | 27.44 | 9.74 | 8.95 | 22.31 | 19.88 | 1.32 | 3.46 | |
施氮量 N rate(N) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ns | * | |
密度 Density(D) | ns | ns | ** | * | ns | ns | ns | * | |
施氮量×密度N×D | ns | ns | ** | * | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
丰两优4号 Fengliangyou 4 | N0D1 | 4.26±0.23 b | 3.27±0.17 c | 23.24±1.23 ab | 22.05±1.17 b | 1.52±0.08 b | 0.99±0.05 b | 35.21±1.86 a | 11.94±0.63 ab |
N0D2 | 4.15±0.17 b | 3.18±0.13 c | 23.37±0.94 ab | 22.15±0.90 b | 1.48±0.06 b | 0.97±0.04 b | 34.79±1.41 a | 11.76±0.48 ab | |
N0D3 | 4.00±0.23 b | 2.92±0.17 c | 27.00±1.58 a | 25.71±1.51 a | 1.44±0.08 b | 0.93±0.05 b | 35.07±2.05 a | 12.01±0.70 ab | |
平均Mean | 4.15 | 3.11 | 25.06 | 23.85 | 1.48 | 0.97 | 34.79 | 11.81 | |
N1D1 | 8.05±0.49 a | 6.50±0.40 ab | 19.25±1.18 c | 16.92±1.03 cd | 2.88±0.18 a | 1.78±0.11 a | 37.99±2.32 a | 11.93±0.73 ab | |
N1D2 | 8.17±0.40 a | 6.24±0.31 b | 23.62±1.18 ab | 19.30±0.97 bc | 2.92±0.15 a | 1.88±0.09 a | 35.65±1.78 a | 10.41±0.52 b | |
N1D3 | 8.23±0.45 a | 6.64±0.37 ab | 19.32±1.06 c | 16.88±0.93 c | 2.94±0.16 a | 1.83±0.10 a | 37.89±2.09 a | 11.83±0.65 ab | |
平均Mean | 8.17 | 6.46 | 20.93 | 17.96 | 2.91 | 1.83 | 37.22 | 11.37 | |
N2D1 | 8.41±0.30 a | 7.13±0.26 ab | 15.22±0.55 d | 14.04±0.51 d | 3.00±0.11 a | 1.81±0.07 a | 39.89±1.44 a | 13.14±0.47 a | |
N2D2 | 8.91±0.40 a | 7.36±0.33 ab | 17.40±0.78 cd | 15.11±0.68 d | 3.18±0.14 a | 1.94±0.09 a | 38.98±1.78 a | 12.09±0.55 ab | |
N2D3 | 8.59±0.39 a | 6.81±0.31 a | 20.72±0.95 bc | 18.31±0.84 c | 3.07±0.15 a | 1.92±0.08 a | 37.36±1.71 a | 11.79±0.54 ab | |
平均Mean | 8.61 | 7.11 | 17.42 | 15.46 | 3.08 | 1.89 | 38.60 | 12.25 | |
F值 F value | 35.77 | 42.15 | 11.19 | 14.62 | 35.61 | 31.77 | 1.02 | 1.37 | |
施氮量 N rate(N) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ns | ns | |
密度 Density(D) | ns | ns | ** | * | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
施氮量×密度N×D | ns | ns | * | * | ns | ns | ns | ns |
表7 2023年施氮量与移栽密度对小粒杂交稻物质转运
Table 7. Effect of nitrogen application and transplanting density on matter transport of rice in each treatment in 2023
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 茎鞘干质量 Dry weight of stems (t/hm2) | 茎鞘物质 输出率 Dry matter output rate of stem and sheath (%) | 茎鞘物质 转换率 Conversion rate of stem and sheath matter (%) | 叶片干质量 Dry weight of leaves (t/hm2) | 茎鞘物质 输出率 Dry matter output rate of stem and sheath (%) | 茎鞘物质 转换率 Conversion rate of stem and sheath matter (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
齐穗期 Full heading | 成熟期 Maturity | 齐穗期 Full heading | 成熟期 Maturity | ||||||
卓两优0985 Zhuoliangyou 0985 | N0D1 | 4.28±0.23 b | 3.11±0.16 c | 27.34±1.45 a | 21.08±1.11 ab | 1.71±0.09 b | 1.05±0.05 b | 38.68±2.05 ab | 11.93±0.63 bc |
N0D2 | 4.10±0.17 b | 2.86±0.12 c | 30.24±1.22 a | 23.22±0.94 a | 1.64±0.07 b | 1.05±0.04 b | 35.93±1.45 b | 11.02±0.45 c | |
N0D3 | 3.97±0.22 b | 3.06±0.18 c | 22.92±1.34 bc | 19.20±1.13 b | 1.60±0.09 b | 0.94±0.06 b | 40.82±2.39 ab | 13.75±0.81 a | |
平均Mean | 4.13 | 2.99 | 27.60 | 21.88 | 1.65 | 1.02 | 38.25 | 12.11 | |
N1D1 | 6.83±0.42 a | 5.36±0.33 ab | 21.52±1.31 bc | 15.91±0.97 c | 2.72±0.17 a | 1.61±0.10 a | 40.96±2.50 ab | 12.06±0.74 bc | |
N1D2 | 6.88±0.34 a | 4.97±0.25 b | 27.76±1.39 a | 19.14±0.96 b | 2.75±0.14 a | 1.70±0.09 a | 38.20±1.91 ab | 10.53±0.53 c | |
N1D3 | 6.62±0.36 a | 4.70±0.26 b | 29.00±1.60 a | 21.03±1.16 ab | 2.65±0.15 a | 1.64±0.09 a | 38.13±2.10 ab | 11.05±0.61 bc | |
平均Mean | 6.77 | 5.01 | 26.00 | 18.62 | 2.71 | 1.65 | 39.18 | 11.23 | |
N2D1 | 7.28±0.26 a | 5.79±0.21 a | 20.47±0.74 c | 15.68±0.57 c | 2.91±0.10 a | 1.64±0.06 a | 43.71±1.58 a | 13.39±0.48 a | |
N2D2 | 7.19±0.32 a | 5.55±0.25 ab | 22.81±1.03 bc | 16.24±0.73 c | 2.88±0.13 a | 1.71±0.08 a | 40.54±1.83 ab | 11.55±0.52 bc | |
N2D3 | 7.07±0.32 a | 5.65±0.26 ab | 20.08±0.92 c | 15.76±0.71 c | 2.83±0.14 a | 1.66±0.07 a | 41.30±1.89 ab | 12.95±0.59 ab | |
平均Mean | 7.17 | 5.80 | 19.11 | 14.36 | 2.87 | 1.67 | 41.79 | 12.56 | |
F值 F value | 22.48 | 27.44 | 9.74 | 8.95 | 22.31 | 19.88 | 1.32 | 3.46 | |
施氮量 N rate(N) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ns | * | |
密度 Density(D) | ns | ns | ** | * | ns | ns | ns | * | |
施氮量×密度N×D | ns | ns | ** | * | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
丰两优4号 Fengliangyou 4 | N0D1 | 4.26±0.23 b | 3.27±0.17 c | 23.24±1.23 ab | 22.05±1.17 b | 1.52±0.08 b | 0.99±0.05 b | 35.21±1.86 a | 11.94±0.63 ab |
N0D2 | 4.15±0.17 b | 3.18±0.13 c | 23.37±0.94 ab | 22.15±0.90 b | 1.48±0.06 b | 0.97±0.04 b | 34.79±1.41 a | 11.76±0.48 ab | |
N0D3 | 4.00±0.23 b | 2.92±0.17 c | 27.00±1.58 a | 25.71±1.51 a | 1.44±0.08 b | 0.93±0.05 b | 35.07±2.05 a | 12.01±0.70 ab | |
平均Mean | 4.15 | 3.11 | 25.06 | 23.85 | 1.48 | 0.97 | 34.79 | 11.81 | |
N1D1 | 8.05±0.49 a | 6.50±0.40 ab | 19.25±1.18 c | 16.92±1.03 cd | 2.88±0.18 a | 1.78±0.11 a | 37.99±2.32 a | 11.93±0.73 ab | |
N1D2 | 8.17±0.40 a | 6.24±0.31 b | 23.62±1.18 ab | 19.30±0.97 bc | 2.92±0.15 a | 1.88±0.09 a | 35.65±1.78 a | 10.41±0.52 b | |
N1D3 | 8.23±0.45 a | 6.64±0.37 ab | 19.32±1.06 c | 16.88±0.93 c | 2.94±0.16 a | 1.83±0.10 a | 37.89±2.09 a | 11.83±0.65 ab | |
平均Mean | 8.17 | 6.46 | 20.93 | 17.96 | 2.91 | 1.83 | 37.22 | 11.37 | |
N2D1 | 8.41±0.30 a | 7.13±0.26 ab | 15.22±0.55 d | 14.04±0.51 d | 3.00±0.11 a | 1.81±0.07 a | 39.89±1.44 a | 13.14±0.47 a | |
N2D2 | 8.91±0.40 a | 7.36±0.33 ab | 17.40±0.78 cd | 15.11±0.68 d | 3.18±0.14 a | 1.94±0.09 a | 38.98±1.78 a | 12.09±0.55 ab | |
N2D3 | 8.59±0.39 a | 6.81±0.31 a | 20.72±0.95 bc | 18.31±0.84 c | 3.07±0.15 a | 1.92±0.08 a | 37.36±1.71 a | 11.79±0.54 ab | |
平均Mean | 8.61 | 7.11 | 17.42 | 15.46 | 3.08 | 1.89 | 38.60 | 12.25 | |
F值 F value | 35.77 | 42.15 | 11.19 | 14.62 | 35.61 | 31.77 | 1.02 | 1.37 | |
施氮量 N rate(N) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ns | ns | |
密度 Density(D) | ns | ns | ** | * | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
施氮量×密度N×D | ns | ns | * | * | ns | ns | ns | ns |
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 有效穗数 Effective panicles (104/hm2) | 每穗粒数 Grains per panicles | 结实率 Seed setting rate(%) | 千粒重 1000-grain weight(g) | 理论产量 Theoretical yield (t/hm2) | 实际产量 Actual yield (t/hm2) | 经济系数 Harvest index |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
卓两优 0985 Zhuoliangyou 0985 | 177.78±9.41 b | 181.6±9.6 c | 84.01±1.75 a | 22.25±0.46 a | 6.03±0.32 b | 5.92±0.31 b | 0.56±0.01 ab | |
N0D2 | 164.54±6.65 b | 195.5±7.9 bc | 83.71±2.56 a | 22.26±0.68 a | 5.99±0.24 b | 5.88±0.24 b | 0.58±0.02 a | |
N0D3 | 147.61±8.65 b | 199.4±11.7 bc | 84.14±1.26 a | 22.34±0.34 a | 5.53±0.32 b | 5.28±0.31 b | 0.54±0.01 abc | |
平均Mean | 163.31 | 192.17 | 83.95 | 22.28 | 5.85 | 5.69 | 0.56 | |
N1D1 | 265.14±16.20 a | 211.7±12.9 abc | 75.42±1.32 b | 22.05±0.39 a | 9.33±0.57 a | 9.04±0.55 a | 0.54±0.01 abc | |
N1D2 | 264.54±13.22 a | 223.4±11.2 ab | 74.26±1.86 b | 22.08±0.55 a | 9.69±0.48 a | 9.54±0.48 a | 0.57±0.01 ab | |
N1D3 | 236.72±13.04 a | 241.1±13.3 a | 74.11±1.34 b | 22.05±0.40 a | 9.33±0.51 a | 9.23±0.51 a | 0.57±0.01 ab | |
平均Mean | 255.47 | 225.40 | 74.60 | 22.06 | 9.45 | 9.27 | 0.56 | |
N2D1 | 268.42±9.68 a | 212.7±7.7 abc | 76.25±2.33 b | 22.06±0.67 a | 9.60±0.35 a | 9.21±0.33 a | 0.52±0.02 c | |
N2D2 | 272.64±12.29 a | 220.8±1.0 ab | 74.28±1.86 b | 22.04±0.55 a | 9.86±0.44 a | 9.63±0.43 a | 0.55±0.01 abc | |
N2D3 | 239.82±10.99 a | 242.7±11.1 a | 74.01±1.75 b | 22.07±0.52 a | 9.51±0.43 a | 9.31±0.42 a | 0.54±0.01 bc | |
平均Mean | 260.29 | 225.40 | 74.85 | 22.06 | 9.66 | 9.38 | 0.53 | |
F值 F value | 18.63 | 3.57 | 6.51 | 0.05 | 19.59 | 19.88 | 2.58 | |
施氮量 N rate(N) | ** | ** | ns | ns | ** | ** | * | |
密度 Density(D) | * | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
施氮量×密度N×D | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
丰两优4号 Fengliangyou 4 | N0D1 | 189.42±10.2 b | 109.8±5.8 d | 85.02±1.77 a | 29.25±0.61 a | 5.17±0.27 b | 5.01±0.27 b | 0.52±0.01 a |
N0D2 | 179.83±7.27 b | 114.5±4.6 cd | 84.78±2.59 a | 29.31±0.89 a | 5.12±0.21 b | 4.88±0.20 b | 0.52±0.02 a | |
N0D3 | 163.44±9.58 b | 119.4±7.0 bcd | 85.14±1.30 a | 29.33±0.45 a | 4.87±0.29 b | 4.64±0.28 b | 0.52±0.01 a | |
平均Mean | 177.56 | 114.57 | 84.98 | 29.30 | 5.05 | 4.84 | 0.52 | |
N1D1 | 319.56±19.53 a | 135.0±8.1 bcd | 74.24±1.33 b | 29.03±0.51 a | 9.30±0.56 a | 9.13±0.55 a | 0.50±0.01 ab | |
N1D2 | 310.84±15.54 a | 144.4±7.2 ab | 74.66±1.87 b | 28.94±0.72 a | 9.70±0.48 a | 9.51±0.48 a | 0.52±0.01 ab | |
N1D3 | 276.53±15.23 a | 157.3±8.6 a | 75.14±1.35 b | 29.11±0.52 a | 9.51±0.52 a | 9.26±0.51 a | 0.50±0.01 ab | |
平均Mean | 302.31 | 143.53 | 74.68 | 29.03 | 9.50 | 9.30 | 0.50 | |
N2D1 | 320.78±11.57 a | 134.3±4.8 bc | 75.01±2.29 b | 29.04±0.59 a | 9.38±0.34 a | 9.13±0.33 a | 0.48±0.02 b | |
N2D2 | 319.56±14.41 a | 146.1±6.6 a | 74.59±1.86 b | 29.06±0.73 a | 10.12±0.43 a | 9.82±0.44 a | 0.49±0.01 ab | |
N2D3 | 280.41±12.85 a | 162.6±7.5 a | 75.26±1.78 b | 28.98±0.68 a | 9.94±0.46 a | 9.71±0.46 a | 0.50±0.01 ab | |
平均Mean | 306.92 | 147.67 | 74.95 | 29.03 | 9.82 | 9.55 | 0.49 | |
F值 F value | 24.34 | 7.24 | 7.66 | 0.045 | 30.71 | 31.73 | 1.74 | |
施氮量 N rate(N) | ** | ** | ns | ns | * | ** | ns | |
密度 Density(D) | ** | ns | ns | ns | ns | * | ns | |
施氮量×密度N×D | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
表8 2022年施氮量与移栽密度对小粒杂交稻产量及其构成因素的影响
Table 8. Effect of nitrogen application and transplanting density on rice yield and its components in 2022
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 有效穗数 Effective panicles (104/hm2) | 每穗粒数 Grains per panicles | 结实率 Seed setting rate(%) | 千粒重 1000-grain weight(g) | 理论产量 Theoretical yield (t/hm2) | 实际产量 Actual yield (t/hm2) | 经济系数 Harvest index |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
卓两优 0985 Zhuoliangyou 0985 | 177.78±9.41 b | 181.6±9.6 c | 84.01±1.75 a | 22.25±0.46 a | 6.03±0.32 b | 5.92±0.31 b | 0.56±0.01 ab | |
N0D2 | 164.54±6.65 b | 195.5±7.9 bc | 83.71±2.56 a | 22.26±0.68 a | 5.99±0.24 b | 5.88±0.24 b | 0.58±0.02 a | |
N0D3 | 147.61±8.65 b | 199.4±11.7 bc | 84.14±1.26 a | 22.34±0.34 a | 5.53±0.32 b | 5.28±0.31 b | 0.54±0.01 abc | |
平均Mean | 163.31 | 192.17 | 83.95 | 22.28 | 5.85 | 5.69 | 0.56 | |
N1D1 | 265.14±16.20 a | 211.7±12.9 abc | 75.42±1.32 b | 22.05±0.39 a | 9.33±0.57 a | 9.04±0.55 a | 0.54±0.01 abc | |
N1D2 | 264.54±13.22 a | 223.4±11.2 ab | 74.26±1.86 b | 22.08±0.55 a | 9.69±0.48 a | 9.54±0.48 a | 0.57±0.01 ab | |
N1D3 | 236.72±13.04 a | 241.1±13.3 a | 74.11±1.34 b | 22.05±0.40 a | 9.33±0.51 a | 9.23±0.51 a | 0.57±0.01 ab | |
平均Mean | 255.47 | 225.40 | 74.60 | 22.06 | 9.45 | 9.27 | 0.56 | |
N2D1 | 268.42±9.68 a | 212.7±7.7 abc | 76.25±2.33 b | 22.06±0.67 a | 9.60±0.35 a | 9.21±0.33 a | 0.52±0.02 c | |
N2D2 | 272.64±12.29 a | 220.8±1.0 ab | 74.28±1.86 b | 22.04±0.55 a | 9.86±0.44 a | 9.63±0.43 a | 0.55±0.01 abc | |
N2D3 | 239.82±10.99 a | 242.7±11.1 a | 74.01±1.75 b | 22.07±0.52 a | 9.51±0.43 a | 9.31±0.42 a | 0.54±0.01 bc | |
平均Mean | 260.29 | 225.40 | 74.85 | 22.06 | 9.66 | 9.38 | 0.53 | |
F值 F value | 18.63 | 3.57 | 6.51 | 0.05 | 19.59 | 19.88 | 2.58 | |
施氮量 N rate(N) | ** | ** | ns | ns | ** | ** | * | |
密度 Density(D) | * | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
施氮量×密度N×D | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
丰两优4号 Fengliangyou 4 | N0D1 | 189.42±10.2 b | 109.8±5.8 d | 85.02±1.77 a | 29.25±0.61 a | 5.17±0.27 b | 5.01±0.27 b | 0.52±0.01 a |
N0D2 | 179.83±7.27 b | 114.5±4.6 cd | 84.78±2.59 a | 29.31±0.89 a | 5.12±0.21 b | 4.88±0.20 b | 0.52±0.02 a | |
N0D3 | 163.44±9.58 b | 119.4±7.0 bcd | 85.14±1.30 a | 29.33±0.45 a | 4.87±0.29 b | 4.64±0.28 b | 0.52±0.01 a | |
平均Mean | 177.56 | 114.57 | 84.98 | 29.30 | 5.05 | 4.84 | 0.52 | |
N1D1 | 319.56±19.53 a | 135.0±8.1 bcd | 74.24±1.33 b | 29.03±0.51 a | 9.30±0.56 a | 9.13±0.55 a | 0.50±0.01 ab | |
N1D2 | 310.84±15.54 a | 144.4±7.2 ab | 74.66±1.87 b | 28.94±0.72 a | 9.70±0.48 a | 9.51±0.48 a | 0.52±0.01 ab | |
N1D3 | 276.53±15.23 a | 157.3±8.6 a | 75.14±1.35 b | 29.11±0.52 a | 9.51±0.52 a | 9.26±0.51 a | 0.50±0.01 ab | |
平均Mean | 302.31 | 143.53 | 74.68 | 29.03 | 9.50 | 9.30 | 0.50 | |
N2D1 | 320.78±11.57 a | 134.3±4.8 bc | 75.01±2.29 b | 29.04±0.59 a | 9.38±0.34 a | 9.13±0.33 a | 0.48±0.02 b | |
N2D2 | 319.56±14.41 a | 146.1±6.6 a | 74.59±1.86 b | 29.06±0.73 a | 10.12±0.43 a | 9.82±0.44 a | 0.49±0.01 ab | |
N2D3 | 280.41±12.85 a | 162.6±7.5 a | 75.26±1.78 b | 28.98±0.68 a | 9.94±0.46 a | 9.71±0.46 a | 0.50±0.01 ab | |
平均Mean | 306.92 | 147.67 | 74.95 | 29.03 | 9.82 | 9.55 | 0.49 | |
F值 F value | 24.34 | 7.24 | 7.66 | 0.045 | 30.71 | 31.73 | 1.74 | |
施氮量 N rate(N) | ** | ** | ns | ns | * | ** | ns | |
密度 Density(D) | ** | ns | ns | ns | ns | * | ns | |
施氮量×密度N×D | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 有效穗数 Effective panicles (×104/hm2) | 每穗粒数 Grains per panicle | 结实率 Seed setting rate(%) | 千粒重 1000-grain weight(g) | 理论产量 Theoretical yield (t/hm2) | 实际产量 Actual yield (t/hm2) | 经济系数 Harvest index |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
卓两优0985 Zhuoliangyou 0985 | 183.58±9.71 b | 189.54±10.03 c | 85.24±1.30 a | 22.35±0.47 a | 6.63±0.35 b | 6.42±0.34 b | 0.60±0.01 bcd | |
N0D2 | 172.54±6.97 b | 198.65±8.03 bc | 84.68±1.29 ab | 22.32±0.68 a | 6.48±0.26 b | 6.17±0.25 b | 0.60±0.02 bcd | |
N0D3 | 156.87±9.20 b | 201.54±11.81 bc | 85.78±1.31 a | 22.36±0.34 a | 6.06±0.36 b | 5.48±0.32 b | 0.56±0.01 d | |
平均Mean | 171.00 | 196.58 | 85.23 | 22.34 | 6.39 | 6.02 | 0.59 | |
N1D1 | 276.21±16.88 a | 219.56±13.42 abc | 81.15±1.24 b | 22.11±0.39 a | 10.88±0.66 a | 10.68±0.65 a | 0.62±0.01 abc | |
N1D2 | 275.84±13.79 a | 227.21±11.36 abc | 82.35±1.26 ab | 22.12±0.55 a | 11.42±0.57 a | 11.54±0.58 a | 0.66±0.02 a | |
N1D3 | 243.15±13.39 a | 242.54±13.36 a | 82.17±1.25 ab | 22.15±0.40 a | 10.73±0.59 a | 10.55±0.58 a | 0.64±0.01 abc | |
平均Mean | 265.07 | 229.77 | 81.89 | 22.13 | 11.01 | 10.92 | 0.64 | |
N2D1 | 278.58±10.04 a | 222.68±8.03 abc | 81.25±1.24 b | 22.14±0.68 a | 11.16±0.40 a | 10.98±0.40 a | 0.61±0.02 abc | |
N2D2 | 276.98±12.49 a | 233.68±10.54 ab | 82.67±1.26 ab | 22.15±0.55 a | 11.85±0.53 a | 11.68±0.53 a | 0.65±0.02 ab | |
N2D3 | 244.64±11.21 a | 243.11±11.14 a | 81.86±1.25 ab | 22.18±0.52 a | 10.80±0.49 a | 10.42±0.48 a | 0.59±0.01 cd | |
平均Mean | 266.73 | 233.16 | 81.93 | 22.16 | 11.27 | 11.03 | 0.62 | |
F值 F value | 17.65 | 3.1 | 1.90 | 0.039 | 24.45 | 28.08 | 4.76 | |
施氮量 N rate(N) | ** | ** | ns | ns | * | * | ** | |
密度 Density(D) | ** | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
施氮量×密度N×D | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
丰两优4号 Fengliang you 4 | N0D1 | 192.36±10.18 b | 111.54±5.90 d | 86.65±1.32 a | 29.31±0.61 a | 5.45±0.29 b | 5.19±0.27 b | 0.53±0.01 c |
N0D2 | 182.35±7.37 b | 114.69±4.64 cd | 85.47±1.31 ab | 29.31±0.89 a | 5.24±0.21 b | 5.06±0.20 b | 0.53±0.02 c | |
N0D3 | 165.42±9.69 b | 120.56±7.06 bcd | 86.95±1.33 a | 29.33±0.45 a | 5.09±0.30 b | 4.86±0.28 b | 0.53±0.01 c | |
平均Mean | 180.04 | 115.60 | 86.36 | 29.32 | 5.26 | 5.04 | 0.53 | |
N1D1 | 320.41±19.58 a | 139.57±8.53 ab | 82.14±1.25 b | 29.11±0.51 a | 10.69±0.65 a | 10.59±0.65 a | 0.57±0.01 abc | |
N1D2 | 320.21±16.01 a | 149.51±7.48 a | 83.46±1.27 ab | 29.07±0.73 a | 11.62±0.58 a | 11.56±0.58 a | 0.60±0.02 a | |
N1D3 | 288.52±15.89 a | 155.68±8.57 a | 84.14±1.28 ab | 29.15±0.53 a | 11.02±0.61 a | 10.89±0.60 a | 0.59±0.01 ab | |
平均Mean | 309.71 | 148.25 | 83.25 | 29.11 | 11.11 | 11.01 | 0.58 | |
N2D1 | 324.01±11.68 a | 136.05±4.91 abc | 83.26±1.27 ab | 29.01±0.88 a | 10.65±0.38 a | 10.54±0.38 a | 0.55±0.02 bc | |
N2D2 | 325.24±14.67 a | 150.25±6.77 a | 83.98±1.31 ab | 29.08±0.73 a | 11.93±0.54 a | 11.86±0.52 a | 0.58±0.02 ab | |
N2D3 | 289.24±13.25 a | 159.68±7.32 a | 84.15±1.28 ab | 29.13±0.69 a | 11.32±0.52 a | 11.24±0.54 a | 0.57±0.01 abc | |
平均Mean | 312.83 | 148.66 | 83.80 | 29.07 | 11.30 | 11.21 | 0.57 | |
F值 F value | 24.46 | 6.82 | 1.52 | 0.03 | 39.45 | 42.24 | 4.24 | |
施氮量 N rate(N) | ** | ** | * | ns | * | * | ** | |
密度 Density(D) | * | * | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
施氮量×密度N×D | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
表9 2023年施氮量与移栽密度对小粒杂交稻产量及其构成因素的影响
Table 9. Effect of nitrogen application and transplanting density on rice yield and its components in 2023
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 有效穗数 Effective panicles (×104/hm2) | 每穗粒数 Grains per panicle | 结实率 Seed setting rate(%) | 千粒重 1000-grain weight(g) | 理论产量 Theoretical yield (t/hm2) | 实际产量 Actual yield (t/hm2) | 经济系数 Harvest index |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
卓两优0985 Zhuoliangyou 0985 | 183.58±9.71 b | 189.54±10.03 c | 85.24±1.30 a | 22.35±0.47 a | 6.63±0.35 b | 6.42±0.34 b | 0.60±0.01 bcd | |
N0D2 | 172.54±6.97 b | 198.65±8.03 bc | 84.68±1.29 ab | 22.32±0.68 a | 6.48±0.26 b | 6.17±0.25 b | 0.60±0.02 bcd | |
N0D3 | 156.87±9.20 b | 201.54±11.81 bc | 85.78±1.31 a | 22.36±0.34 a | 6.06±0.36 b | 5.48±0.32 b | 0.56±0.01 d | |
平均Mean | 171.00 | 196.58 | 85.23 | 22.34 | 6.39 | 6.02 | 0.59 | |
N1D1 | 276.21±16.88 a | 219.56±13.42 abc | 81.15±1.24 b | 22.11±0.39 a | 10.88±0.66 a | 10.68±0.65 a | 0.62±0.01 abc | |
N1D2 | 275.84±13.79 a | 227.21±11.36 abc | 82.35±1.26 ab | 22.12±0.55 a | 11.42±0.57 a | 11.54±0.58 a | 0.66±0.02 a | |
N1D3 | 243.15±13.39 a | 242.54±13.36 a | 82.17±1.25 ab | 22.15±0.40 a | 10.73±0.59 a | 10.55±0.58 a | 0.64±0.01 abc | |
平均Mean | 265.07 | 229.77 | 81.89 | 22.13 | 11.01 | 10.92 | 0.64 | |
N2D1 | 278.58±10.04 a | 222.68±8.03 abc | 81.25±1.24 b | 22.14±0.68 a | 11.16±0.40 a | 10.98±0.40 a | 0.61±0.02 abc | |
N2D2 | 276.98±12.49 a | 233.68±10.54 ab | 82.67±1.26 ab | 22.15±0.55 a | 11.85±0.53 a | 11.68±0.53 a | 0.65±0.02 ab | |
N2D3 | 244.64±11.21 a | 243.11±11.14 a | 81.86±1.25 ab | 22.18±0.52 a | 10.80±0.49 a | 10.42±0.48 a | 0.59±0.01 cd | |
平均Mean | 266.73 | 233.16 | 81.93 | 22.16 | 11.27 | 11.03 | 0.62 | |
F值 F value | 17.65 | 3.1 | 1.90 | 0.039 | 24.45 | 28.08 | 4.76 | |
施氮量 N rate(N) | ** | ** | ns | ns | * | * | ** | |
密度 Density(D) | ** | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
施氮量×密度N×D | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
丰两优4号 Fengliang you 4 | N0D1 | 192.36±10.18 b | 111.54±5.90 d | 86.65±1.32 a | 29.31±0.61 a | 5.45±0.29 b | 5.19±0.27 b | 0.53±0.01 c |
N0D2 | 182.35±7.37 b | 114.69±4.64 cd | 85.47±1.31 ab | 29.31±0.89 a | 5.24±0.21 b | 5.06±0.20 b | 0.53±0.02 c | |
N0D3 | 165.42±9.69 b | 120.56±7.06 bcd | 86.95±1.33 a | 29.33±0.45 a | 5.09±0.30 b | 4.86±0.28 b | 0.53±0.01 c | |
平均Mean | 180.04 | 115.60 | 86.36 | 29.32 | 5.26 | 5.04 | 0.53 | |
N1D1 | 320.41±19.58 a | 139.57±8.53 ab | 82.14±1.25 b | 29.11±0.51 a | 10.69±0.65 a | 10.59±0.65 a | 0.57±0.01 abc | |
N1D2 | 320.21±16.01 a | 149.51±7.48 a | 83.46±1.27 ab | 29.07±0.73 a | 11.62±0.58 a | 11.56±0.58 a | 0.60±0.02 a | |
N1D3 | 288.52±15.89 a | 155.68±8.57 a | 84.14±1.28 ab | 29.15±0.53 a | 11.02±0.61 a | 10.89±0.60 a | 0.59±0.01 ab | |
平均Mean | 309.71 | 148.25 | 83.25 | 29.11 | 11.11 | 11.01 | 0.58 | |
N2D1 | 324.01±11.68 a | 136.05±4.91 abc | 83.26±1.27 ab | 29.01±0.88 a | 10.65±0.38 a | 10.54±0.38 a | 0.55±0.02 bc | |
N2D2 | 325.24±14.67 a | 150.25±6.77 a | 83.98±1.31 ab | 29.08±0.73 a | 11.93±0.54 a | 11.86±0.52 a | 0.58±0.02 ab | |
N2D3 | 289.24±13.25 a | 159.68±7.32 a | 84.15±1.28 ab | 29.13±0.69 a | 11.32±0.52 a | 11.24±0.54 a | 0.57±0.01 abc | |
平均Mean | 312.83 | 148.66 | 83.80 | 29.07 | 11.30 | 11.21 | 0.57 | |
F值 F value | 24.46 | 6.82 | 1.52 | 0.03 | 39.45 | 42.24 | 4.24 | |
施氮量 N rate(N) | ** | ** | * | ns | * | * | ** | |
密度 Density(D) | * | * | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
施氮量×密度N×D | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
[1] | 乔月, 朱建强, 吴启侠, 黄思倩, 李明辉. 氮肥运筹下不同种植方式水稻对氮素的吸收、转运和利用[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021(6): 180-188. |
Qiao Y, Zhu J Q, Wu Q X, Huang S Q, Li M H. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer management on nitrogen absorption, translocation and utilization of rice in different planting methods[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2021(6): 180-188. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 杨建昌, 杜永, 吴长付, 刘立军, 王志琴, 朱庆森. 超高产粳型水稻生长发育特性的研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2006(7): 1336-1345. |
Yang J C, Du Y, Wu C F, Liu L J, Wang Z Q, Zhu Q S. Growth and development characteristics of super-high-yielding mid-season japonica rice[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2006(7): 1336-1345. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 郭九信, 孔亚丽, 谢凯柳, 李东海, 冯绪猛, 凌宁, 王敏, 郭世伟. 养分管理对直播稻产量和氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(7): 1016-1025. |
Guo J X, Kong Y L, Xie K L, Li D H, Feng X M, Ling N, Wang M, Guo S W. Effects of nutrient management on yield and nitrogen use efficiency of direct seeding rice[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2016, 42(7): 1016-1025. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 陈海飞, 冯洋, 蔡红梅, 徐芳森, 周卫, 刘芳, 庞再明, 李登荣. 氮肥与移栽密度互作对低产田水稻群体结构及产量的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(6): 1319-1328. |
Chen H F, Feng Y, Cai H M, Xu F S, Zhou W, Liu F, Pang Z M, Li D R. Effect of the interaction of nitrogen and transplanting density on the rice population structure and grain yield in low-yield paddy fields[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2014, 20(6): 1319-1328. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 龙文飞, 傅志强, 钟娟, 苏珊, 李康丽. 节水灌溉条件下氮密互作对双季晚稻丰源优299物质生产特性的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2017, 32(2): 185-193. |
Long W F, Fu Z Q, Zhong J, Su S, Li K L. Effects of nitrogen application and planting density on late rice fengyuanyou 299 material production characteristics under the condition of water saving irrigation[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2017, 32(2): 185-193. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 吴培, 陈天晔, 袁嘉琦, 黄恒, 邢志鹏, 胡雅杰, 朱明, 李德剑, 刘国林, 张洪程. 施氮量和直播密度互作对水稻产量形成特征的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(3): 269-281. |
Wu P, Chen T Y, Yan J Q, Huang H, Xing Z P, Hu Y J, Zhu M, Li D J, Liu G L, Zhang H C. Effects of interaction between nitrogen application rate and direct-sowing density on yield formation characteristics of rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2019, 33(3): 269-281. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 周勇, 黄世君, 李乾安, 魏应海, 曾松, 杨建刚, 郑英. 高产大穗型水稻品种干物质积累与分配特性研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2014, 27(3): 910-914. |
Zhou Y, Huang S J, Li Q A, Wei Y H, Zeng S, Yang J G, Zheng Y. Studies on dry matter accumulation and distributive characteristics in high-yield,big-panicle rice[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 27(3): 910-914. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 刘坚, 陶红剑, 施思, 叶卫军, 钱前, 郭龙彪. 水稻穗型的遗传和育种改良[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2012, 26(2): 227-234. |
Liu J, Tao H J, Shi S, Ye W J, Qian Q, Guo L B. Genetics and breeding improvement for panicle type in rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2012, 26(2): 227-234. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 马均, 朱庆森, 马文波, 田彦华, 杨建昌, 周开达. 重穗型水稻光合作用、物质积累与运转的研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2003(4): 375-381. |
Ma J, Zhu Q S, Ma W B, Tian Y H, Yang J C, ZhouK D. Studies on the photosynthetic characteristics and accumulation and transformation of assimilation product in heavy panicle type of rice[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2003(4): 375-381. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 秦俭, 杨志远, 孙永健, 徐徽, 马均. 不同穗型杂交籼稻物质积累、氮素吸收利用和产量的差异比较[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2014, 28(5): 514-522. |
Qin J, Yang Z Y, Sun Y J, Xu H, Ma J. Different ialcomparison of assimilation products accumulation, nitrogenuptake and utilization and grain yield of hybrid indicarice combinations with different panicletypes[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2014, 28(5): 514-522. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 闫川, 洪晓富, 阮关海, 余守武, 王绍华, 丁艳锋. 大穗型水稻-(13)C光合产物的积累与分配[J]. 核农学报, 2014, 28 (7): 1282-1287. |
Yan C, Hong X H, Ruan G H, Yu S W, Wang S H, Ding Y F. Studies on the accumulation and transformation of assimilation product of heavy panicle type rice using 13C labeling technique[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 28(7): 1282-1287. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 王悦, 吴周周, 刘佳欣, 周禅禅, 王术, 贾宝艳, 黄元财, 王岩, 王韵, 冯跃. 灌溉模式与施氮方式对北方粳稻产量及干物质积累的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(5): 71-77. |
Wang Y, Wu Z Z, Liu J X, Zhou C C, Wang S, Jia B Y, Huang Y C, Wang Y, Wang Y, Feng Y. Effects of irrigation pattern and nitrogen application on yield and dry matter accumulation of northern japonica rice[J]. China Rice, 2023, 29(5): 71-77. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 马群, 杨雄, 李敏, 李国业, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 高辉. 不同氮肥群体最高生产力水稻品种的物质生产积累[J]. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(20): 4159-4169. |
Ma Q, Yang X, LI M, Li G Y, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Gao H. Studies on the characteristics of dry matter production and accumulation of rice varieties with different productivity levels[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(20): 4159-4169. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 史鸿儒, 张文忠, 解文孝, 杨庆, 张振宇, 韩亚东, 徐正进, 陈温福. 不同氮肥施用模式下北方粳型超级稻物质生产特性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2008(11): 1985-1993. |
Shi H R, Zhang W Z, Jie W X, Yang Q, Zhang Z Y, Han Y D, Xu Z J, Chen W F. Analysis of matter production characteristics under different nitrogen application patterns of japonica super rice in north China[J]. Acta Cropologica Sinica, 2008(11): 1985-1993. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 唐文帮, 陈晓军, 张桂莲, 邓化冰, 胡远艺, 田妍. 杂交水稻机械化制种现状与技术突破[J]. 中国稻米, 2022, 28(5): 20-27. |
Tang W B, Chen X J, Zhang G L, Deng H B, Hu Y Y, Tian Y. Present situation and technical breakthrough of hybrid rice mechanized seed production[J]. China Rice, 2022, 28(5): 20-27. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 唐文帮, 张桂莲, 邓化冰. 杂交水稻机械化制种的技术探索与实践[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(2): 95-103. |
Tang W B, Zhang G L, Deng H B. Technology exploration and practice of hybrid rice mechanized seed production[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2019, 34(2): 95-103. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 俞慧友. 云南个旧杂交中稻超高产攻关亩产突破 1200 公斤[N/OL]. 中国科技网, (2022-09-15) [2023-02-01]. http://www.stdaily.com/index/kejixinwen/202209/247eb0527ec44176a19afe15f6a27da0.shtml. |
Yu H Y. The super high yield researchon hybrid medium rice exceeded 1200 kg per Mu in Gejiu, Yunnan Province, China[N/OL]. China Science and Technology network, (2022-09-15) [2023-02-01]. http://www.stdaily.com/index/kejixinwen/202209/247eb0527ec44176a19afe15f6a27da0.shtml. (in Chinese) | |
[18] | 郭浪, 肖敏, 崔璨, 程周琦, 刘玉武, 卓乐, 吴思, 唐文帮, 易镇邪. 施氮量对小粒型杂交稻产量与氮素利用效率的影响[J]. 杂交水稻, 2023, 38(5): 108-114. |
Guo L, Xiao M, Cui C, Cheng Z Q, Liu Y W, Zhuo L, Wu S, Tang W B, Yi Z X. Effects of nitrogen application rate on yield and nitrogen efficiency of small-grain hybrid rice[J]. Hybrid Rice, 2023, 38(5): 108-114. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 王元康. 机直播条件下小粒型杂交稻品种特性对比研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2022. |
Wang Y K. Comparative study on the characteristics of small-grain hybrid rice varieties under the condition of machine directbroadcasting[D]. Changsha: Hunan Agricultural University, 2022. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 吴桂成, 张洪程, 钱银飞, 李德剑, 周有炎, 徐军, 吴文革, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 高辉, 徐宗进, 钱宗华, 孙菊英, 赵品恒. 粳型超级稻产量构成因素协同规律及超高产特征的研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(2): 266-276. |
Wu G C, Zhang H C, Qian Y F, Li D J, Zhou Y Y, Xu J, Wu W G, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Gao H, Xu Z J, Qian Z H, Sun J Y, Zhao P H. Rule of grain yield components from high yield to super high yield and the characters of super-high yielding japonica super rice[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(2): 266-276. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 张耗, 谈桂露, 薛亚光, 王志琴, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 江苏省粳稻品种近60年演进过程中产量与形态生理特征的变化[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36(1): 133-140. |
Zhang H, Tan G L, Xue Y G, Wang Z Q, Liu L J, Yang J C. Changes in grain yield and morphological and physiological characteristics during 60-year evolution of japonica rice cultivars in jiangsu province, china[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2010, 36(1): 133-140. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 杨惠杰, 李义珍, 杨仁崔, 姜照伟, 郑景生. 超高产水稻的干物质生产特性研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2001, 15(4): 26-31. |
Yang H J, Li Y Z, Yang R C, Jiang Z W, Zheng J S. Dry matter production characteristics of super high yield rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2001, 15(4): 26-31. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 翟虎渠, 曹树青, 万建民, 陆巍, 张荣铣, 李良壁, 匡延云, 闵绍楷, 朱德峰, 程式华. 超高产杂交稻灌浆期光合功能与产量的关系[J]. 中国科学(C辑:生命科学), 2002(3): 211-217. |
Zhai H Q, Cao S Q, Wan J M, Lu W, Zhang R X, Li L B, Kuang Y Y, Min S K, Zhu D F, Cheng S H. Relationship between photosynthetic function and yield of super high yield hybrid rice at filling stage[J]. Science in China (Series C: Life Sciences), 2002(3): 211-217. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 彭既明. 多穗型超级杂交稻研究[J]. 杂交水稻, 2017, 32(4): 1-8. |
Peng J M. Researchonpanicle-richtype super hybrid rice[J]. Hybrid Rice, 2017, 32(4): 1-8. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 周红英, 吴晓亮, 雷东阳, 陈立云, 陈周兵, 张桂莲, 肖应辉, 邓化冰. 超大穗水稻R1126及其组合生育后期光合特性与产量的关系[J]. 现代农业科技, 2023(21): 1-8+19. |
Zhou H Y, Wu X L, Lei D Y, Chen L Y, Chen Z B, Zhang G L, Xiao Y H, Deng H B. Relationship between photosynthetic characteristics at late growth stage and yield of super large panicle rice R1126 and its combinations[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023(21): 1-8+19. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | 汪家凯, 陈文丰, 彭菁菁, 刘彦卓, 梁开明, 李晨, 毛兴学, 潘俊峰. 华南超大穗型水稻种质DS23“源-库-流”特征及其超高产潜力研究[J/OL]. 广东农业科学: 1-12. |
Wang J K, Chen W F, Peng J J, Liu Y Z, Liang K M, Li C, Mao X X, Pan J F. Source-sink-flow characteristics and super-high yield potential of the super-large-panicle rice line DS23 in south china[J/OL]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences: 1-12. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | 张国, 崔克辉. 水稻茎鞘非结构性碳水化合物积累与转运研究进展[J]. 植物生理学报, 2020, 56(6): 1127-1136. |
Zhang G, Cui K H. Research advances on accumulation and translocation of stem non-structural carbohydrates in rice[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2020, 56(6): 1127-1136. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | 唐益平, 李向峰, 王辉, 胡王琴, 任楚婷, 黄亚茹, 徐鹏, 尤翠翠, 柯健, 何海兵, 武立权. 茎鞘非结构性碳水化合物对大穗型粳稻强、弱势粒灌浆与品质的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2021, 36(5): 107-117. |
Tang Y P, Li X F, Wang H, Hu W Q, Ren C T, Huang Y R, Xu P, You C C, Ke J, He H B, Wu LQ. Effect of non-structural carbohydrate in stem and sheath on grain filling and quality of superior and inferior spikelets in large-panicle japonica rice[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 21, 36(5): 107-117. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[29] | 李会杰. 影响水稻分蘖的因素及增加水稻有效分蘖的措施[J]. 现代农村科技, 2013(20): 12. |
Li H J. Factors affecting tillering of rice and measures to increase effective tillering of rice[J]. Modern Rural Science and Technology, 2013(20): 12. (in Chinese) | |
[30] | 刘彦卓, 胡香玉, 黄农荣, 梁开明, 潘俊峰, 田卡, 钟旭华. 氮肥减量后移对华南双季稻产量和氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2021, 48(10): 132-140. |
Liu Y Z, Hu X Y, Huang N R, Liang K M, Pan J F, Tian K, Zhong X H. Grain yield and nitrogen utilization efficiency of double-cropping rice in response to reduced and delayed application of nitrogen in south china[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 48(10): 132-140. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[31] | 崔德心. 开花灌浆期低温对水稻籽粒蛋白质的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2023(18): 27-32. |
Cui D X. Effect of low temperature on protein grain content of rice during flowering and filling stages[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023(18): 27-32. (in Chinese) | |
[32] | 周超, 王俊强, 韩业辉, 许健, 马宝新, 孙善文, 董扬, 丁昕颖. 氮密互作对嫩单23产量及干物质积累特性的影响[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2022(2): 6-9+13. |
Zhou C, Wang J Q, Han Y H, Xu J, Ma B X, Sun S W, Dong Y, Ding X Y. Effects of nitrogenapplication and density interaction on yield and dry matter accumulation characteristics of Nendan 23[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022(2): 6-9+13. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[33] | 王振洋, 王冀川, 袁杰, 王奉斌. 不同施氮量与栽插密度对水稻群体生长及产量构成的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(12): 2969-2978. |
Wang Z Y, Wang J C, Yuan J, Wang F B. Effects of different nitrogen application rates and planting densities on population growth and yield components of rice[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(12): 2969-2978. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[34] | 黄梅燕, 潘文兴, 农永前, 王国明, 韦小莲, 陆干伟, 卢媛. 不同施氮量和种植密度对水稻葛68优9938产量的影响[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2021(11): 107-110. |
Huang M Y, Pan W X, Nong Y Q, Wang G M, Wei X J, Lu G W, Lu Y. Effects of different nitrogen application rates and planting density on yield of rice Ge68you 9938[J]. Bulletin of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021(11): 107-110. (in Chinese) | |
[35] | 罗强鑫, 冯跃华, 许桂玲, 彭庆国, 王晓珂, 彭金风, 苏卫, 欧达, 王玲莉, 卢苇, 韩志丽, 李杰, 李敏, Somsana P. 有机肥施用量和种植密度对有机栽培水稻生长及产量的影响[J]. 作物研究, 2021, 35(2): 102-107+140. |
Luo Q X, Feng Y H, Xu G L, Peng Q G, Wang X K, Peng J F, Su W, Ou D, Wang L L, Lu W, Han Z L, Li J, LI M, Somsana P. Effects of organic fertilizer application rate and planting density on growth and yield of organic cultivation rice[J]. Crop Research, 2019, 35(2): 102-107+140. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[36] | 邓中华, 明日, 李小坤, 郑磊, 徐维明, 杨运清, 任涛, 丛日环, 鲁剑巍. 不同密度和氮肥用量对水稻产量、构成因子及氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 土壤, 2015, 47(1): 20-25. |
Deng Z H, Ming R, Li X K, Zheng L, Xu W M, Yang Y Q, Ren T, Cong R H, Lu J W. Effects of nitrogen application rate and planting density on grain yields, yield components and nitrogen use efficiencies of rice[J]. Soil Science, 2015, 47(1): 20-25. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[37] | 周江明, 赵琳, 董越勇, 徐进, 边武英, 毛杨仓, 章秀福. 氮肥和栽植密度对水稻产量及氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16(2): 274-281. |
Zhou J M, Zhao L, Dong Y Y, Xu J, Bian W Y, Mao Y C, Zhang X F. Nitrogen and transplanting density interactions on the rice yield and N use rate[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2010, 16(2): 274-281. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[38] | 胡杨, 段斌, 何世界, 扶定, 方玲, 李慧龙, 霍二伟, 沈光辉. 基本苗数和氮肥运筹对深两优19产量及稻米品质的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2023, 51(19): 23-26+40. |
Hu Y, Duan B, He S J, Fu D, Fang L, Li H L, Huo E W, Shen G H. Effects of basic seedling number and nitrogen fertilizer management on yield and quality of Shenliangyou 19[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 51(19): 23-26+40. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[39] | 金峰, 邵玺文, 李彦利, 耿艳秋, 华霜, 王帅, 朱明霞, 韩康顺, 时羽. 株行距配置对吉林省水稻生长发育动态及物质生产的影响[J]. 东北农业科学, 2016, 41(5): 17-23. |
Jin F, Shao X W, Li Y L, Geng Y Q, Hua S, Wang S, Zhu M X, Han K S, Shi Y. Effects of row-spacing on dynamics of growth and development, and matter production of rice in Jilin province[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 41(5): 17-23. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[40] | 方文英, 陈佳麒, 沈兴连, 莫红华, 刘海威, 纪国成. 氮肥调控运筹实现甬优12超15 t·hm-2的性状特征与技术途径[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2022, 63(6): 1218-1222. |
Fang W Y, Chen J Q, Shen X L, Mo H H, Liu H W, Ji G C. Characteristics and technical approaches of nitrogen control and management to achieveyield exceeding 15 t·hm-2 of Yongyou 12[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 63(6): 1218-1222. (in Chinese) | |
[41] | 李圆圆, 何平, 茅桁. 稻田水肥管理研究进展及思考[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2023, 41(8): 825-832. |
Li Y Y, He P, Mao H. Research progress and thinking on water and fertilizer management inrice field[J]. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering, 2023, 41(8): 825-832. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 黄亚茹, 徐鹏, 王乐乐, 贺一哲, 王辉, 柯健, 何海兵, 武立权, 尤翠翠. 外源海藻糖对粳稻品系W1844籽粒灌浆特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 379-391. |
[2] | 任维晨, 常庆霞, 张亚军, 朱宽宇, 王志琴, 杨建昌. 不同氮利用率粳稻品种的碳氮积累与转运特征及其生理机制[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(6): 586-600. |
[3] | 苏庆旺, 苍柏峰, 白晨阳, 李韫哲, 宋泽, 李俊材, 吴美康, 魏晓双, 崔菁菁, 武志海. 施硅量对旱作水稻产量和干物质积累的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(1): 87-95. |
[4] | 贾琰, 杨亮, 邹德堂, 瞿炤珺, 王敬国, 刘化龙, 王晋, 赵宏伟. 孕穗期冷水胁迫下施用外源物质对寒地粳稻氮光合效率及产量的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(5): 443-456. |
[5] | 潘俊峰, 王博, 崔克辉, 黄见良, 聂立孝. 氮肥对水稻节间和叶鞘非结构性碳水化合物积累转运特征的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2016, 30(3): 273-282. |
[6] | 裴鹏刚, 张均华, 朱练峰, 胡志华, 金千瑜. 秸秆还田耦合施氮水平对水稻光合特性、氮素吸收及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2015, 29(3): 282-290. |
[7] | 张卫星#,孙成效#,闵捷,段彬伍,朱智伟*. 水稻生育中后期使用外源植酸对产量和米质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2013, 27(6): 603-609. |
[8] | 朱齐超,危常州* ,李美宁,朱金龙,吴诚,王佳. 氮肥运筹对膜下滴灌水稻生长和产量的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2013, 27(4): 440-446. |
[9] | 易镇邪,周文新,屠乃美. 留桩高度对再生稻源库性状与物质运转的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2009, 23(5): 509-516 . |
[10] | 饶立华,薛建明,蒋德安,洪键,陈玉银. 钾营养对杂交稻光合作用动态及产量形成的效应[J]. 中国水稻科学, 1990, 4(3): 106-112 . |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||