中国水稻科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 159-170.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2021.210204
黄涛1,2, 王燕宁1, 钟奇1, 程琴1, 杨朦朦1, 王鹏1, 吴光亮1, 黄诗颖1, 李才敬1, 余剑峰1, 贺浩华1,3,*(), 边建民1,3,*()
收稿日期:
2021-02-06
修回日期:
2021-05-02
出版日期:
2022-03-10
发布日期:
2022-03-11
通讯作者:
贺浩华,边建民
基金资助:
HUANG Tao1,2, WANG Yanning1, ZHONG Qi1, CHENG Qin1, YANG Mengmeng1, WANG Peng1, WU Guangliang1, HUANG Shiying1, LI Caijing1, YU Jianfeng1, HE Haohua1,3,*(), BIAN Jianmin1,3,*()
Received:
2021-02-06
Revised:
2021-05-02
Online:
2022-03-10
Published:
2022-03-11
Contact:
HE Haohua, BIAN Jianmin
摘要:
【目的】 挖掘水稻粒重和粒型相关性状QTL,对于解析水稻籽粒遗传机理具有重要作用。【方法】 本研究以籼稻9311为受体、粳稻日本晴为供体构建的染色体片段置换系(Chromosome Segment Substitution Lines, CSSLs)群体为材料,在4个环境下对控制稻谷与糙米的粒重和粒型QTL进行了定位分析。【结果】 共检测到77个控制水稻粒重和粒型的QTL,贡献率为4.62%~51.01%,其中19个QTL的增效等位基因来自日本晴,58个QTL的增效等位基因来自9311。这些QTL分布在水稻10条染色体的46个区域,其中16个区域为多效性位点。在两个及两个以上环境中重复检测到的QTL有14个,其中qGW5.1和qLW5能够在4个环境中稳定表达,且位于同一染色体区域;qBRL3.2和qGL4.1为新鉴定的影响水稻粒重和粒型的QTL。【结论】 本研究结果为后续克隆这些QTL和解析水稻粒重和粒型遗传机理奠定了基础。
黄涛, 王燕宁, 钟奇, 程琴, 杨朦朦, 王鹏, 吴光亮, 黄诗颖, 李才敬, 余剑峰, 贺浩华, 边建民. 利用染色体片段置换系群体定位和分析水稻粒重和粒型QTL[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(2): 159-170.
HUANG Tao, WANG Yanning, ZHONG Qi, CHENG Qin, YANG Mengmeng, WANG Peng, WU Guangliang, HUANG Shiying, LI Caijing, YU Jianfeng, HE Haohua, BIAN Jianmin. Mapping and Analysis of QTLs for Rice Grain Weight and Grain Shape Using Chromosome Segment Substitution Line Population[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2022, 36(2): 159-170.
性状 Trait | 环境Environment | 亲本 Parent | 置换系群体 CSSL | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
9311 | 日本晴 Nipponbare | 均值±标准Mean±SD | 变幅 Range | 峰度Kurtosis | 偏度Skewness | |||
稻谷粒长 | E1 | 9.86±0.47** | 7.38±1.56 | 9.59±0.35 | 8.37~10.69 | -0.46 | 2.58 | |
Grain length / mm | E2 | 9.76±0.08** | 7.68±0.16 | 9.31±0.28 | 8.23~9.77 | -1.66 | 3.99 | |
E3 | 9.79±0.16** | 7.67±0.19 | 9.52±0.33 | 8.05~10.14 | -1.79 | 5.19 | ||
E4 | 9.80±0.24** | 7.63±0.29 | 9.78±0.31 | 8.71~10.30 | -1.06 | 1.42 | ||
稻谷粒宽 | E1 | 2.79±0.12* | 3.24±0.60 | 2.78±0.13 | 2.55~3.53 | 2.33 | 10.17 | |
Grain width / mm | E2 | 2.48±0.12* | 3.30±0.56 | 2.99±0.12 | 2.69~3.61 | 2.00 | 8.05 | |
E3 | 2.59±0.19* | 3.17±0.00 | 2.81±0.13 | 2.43~3.38 | 1.83 | 6.11 | ||
E4 | 2.65±0.14* | 3.13±0.42 | 2.83±0.11 | 2.56~3.27 | 1.43 | 4.11 | ||
稻谷长宽比 | E1 | 3.55±0.27** | 2.29±0.13 | 3.49±0.19 | 2.62~3.78 | -1.91 | 4.62 | |
Length-width ratio | E2 | 3.47±0.12** | 2.31±0.23 | 3.14±0.16 | 2.42~3.38 | 1.60 | 3.70 | |
E3 | 3.78±0.11** | 2.42±0.19 | 3.41±0.19 | 2.71~3.71 | -1.59 | 2.73 | ||
E4 | 3.70±0.05** | 2.34±0.14 | 3.47±0.18 | 2.60~3.80 | -1.82 | 5.04 | ||
稻谷粒厚 | E1 | 2.26±0.09 | 2.17±0.05 | 2.19±0.05 | 2.04~2.34 | 0.07 | 0.64 | |
Grain thickness / mm | E2 | 2.14±0.10 | 2.09±0.06 | 2.18±0.05 | 2.05~2.33 | 0.20 | 0.12 | |
E3 | 2.09±0.05 | 2.19±0.09 | 2.12±0.06 | 1.93~2.24 | -0.54 | 0.05 | ||
E4 | 1.99±0.06 | 2.01±0.12 | 2.10±0.05 | 1.95~2.20 | -0.33 | 0.05 | ||
稻谷千粒重 | E1 | 31.02±2.37** | 22.44±1.69 | 29.51±2.29 | 22.17~34.21 | -0.64 | 0.70 | |
1000-grain weight / g | E2 | 31.36±3.06** | 22.26±2.01 | 29.63±1.97 | 23.24~34.90 | -0.40 | 0.77 | |
E3 | 30.39±2.74** | 21.86±1.49 | 27.39±2.42 | 19.71~33.65 | -0.21 | 0.48 | ||
E4 | 32.53±2.36** | 22.65±1.84 | 29.46±2.16 | 23.46~33.49 | -0.58 | 0.41 | ||
糙米长 | E1 | 6.87±0.31** | 4.88±0.36 | 6.91±0.23 | 6.14~7.30 | -1.50 | 2.67 | |
Brown rice length | E2 | 6.84±0.41** | 0.86±0.49 | 6.84±0.24 | 5.94~7.36 | -1.64 | 3.57 | |
/mm | E3 | 6.91±0.46** | 4.99±0.61 | 6.93±0.24 | 5.96~7.39 | -1.54 | 3.65 | |
E4 | 6.91±0.37** | 4.70±0.23 | 6.92±0.27 | 5.97~7.54 | -0.57 | 0.55 | ||
糙米宽 | E1 | 2.38±0.12* | 2.70±0.08 | 2.36±0.11 | 2.17~2.92 | 2.04 | 7.85 | |
Brown rice width | E2 | 2.27±0.14* | 2.67±0.13 | 2.52±0.09 | 2.31~3.01 | 1.90 | 9.25 | |
/mm | E3 | 2.32±0.19* | 2.78±0.05 | 2.40±0.09 | 2.16~2.79 | 1.50 | 5.41 | |
E4 | 2.46±0.11* | 2.75±0.06 | 2.36±0.11 | 2.07~2.89 | 1.17 | 4.67 | ||
糙米长宽比 | E1 | 2.98±0.21** | 1.87±0.19 | 2.95±0.17 | 2.17~3.21 | -1.67 | 3.84 | |
Length-to-width ratio | E2 | 2.94±0.23** | 1.84±0.17 | 2.72±0.14 | 2.11~2.99 | -1.56 | 4.07 | |
of brown rice | E3 | 2.98±0.31** | 1.81±0.16 | 2.91±0.15 | 2.33~3.15 | -1.53 | 3.09 | |
E4 | 2.76±0.27** | 1.86±0.19 | 2.95±0.14 | 2.26~3.16 | -1.95 | 5.56 | ||
糙米厚 | E1 | 1.93±0.10 | 2.07±0.06* | 1.93±0.05 | 1.79~2.10 | 0.14 | 0.66 | |
Thickness of brown rice | E2 | 1.90±0.01 | 2.12±0.04* | 1.91±0.05 | 1.77~2.08 | 0.36 | 1.48 | |
/ mm | E3 | 1.85±0.07 | 1.96±0.06* | 1.87±0.05 | 1.73~2.07 | 0.10 | 2.63 | |
E4 | 1.91±0.06 | 2.10±0.05* | 1.88±0.05 | 1.77~2.06 | 0.37 | 0.38 | ||
糙米千粒重 | E1 | 23.55±0.49* | 21.88±0.32 | 24.64±1.57 | 20.47~29.46 | 0.03 | 0.33 | |
1000-grain weight | E2 | 22.86±0.09* | 21.76±0.36 | 24.32±1.37 | 20.34~28.20 | -0.21 | 0.72 | |
of brown rice / g | E3 | 22.29±0.14* | 20.35±0.60 | 23.14±1.61 | 18.19~27.60 | -0.10 | 0.31 | |
E4 | 23.67±0.52* | 21.66±0.54 | 2.83±1.56 | 19.63~26.95 | -0.39 | 0.00 |
表1 四个环境下亲本9311和日本晴及CSSL群体粒重和粒型表现
Table 1 Grain weight and shape performance of 9311 and Nipponbare and CSSLs population in four environments.
性状 Trait | 环境Environment | 亲本 Parent | 置换系群体 CSSL | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
9311 | 日本晴 Nipponbare | 均值±标准Mean±SD | 变幅 Range | 峰度Kurtosis | 偏度Skewness | |||
稻谷粒长 | E1 | 9.86±0.47** | 7.38±1.56 | 9.59±0.35 | 8.37~10.69 | -0.46 | 2.58 | |
Grain length / mm | E2 | 9.76±0.08** | 7.68±0.16 | 9.31±0.28 | 8.23~9.77 | -1.66 | 3.99 | |
E3 | 9.79±0.16** | 7.67±0.19 | 9.52±0.33 | 8.05~10.14 | -1.79 | 5.19 | ||
E4 | 9.80±0.24** | 7.63±0.29 | 9.78±0.31 | 8.71~10.30 | -1.06 | 1.42 | ||
稻谷粒宽 | E1 | 2.79±0.12* | 3.24±0.60 | 2.78±0.13 | 2.55~3.53 | 2.33 | 10.17 | |
Grain width / mm | E2 | 2.48±0.12* | 3.30±0.56 | 2.99±0.12 | 2.69~3.61 | 2.00 | 8.05 | |
E3 | 2.59±0.19* | 3.17±0.00 | 2.81±0.13 | 2.43~3.38 | 1.83 | 6.11 | ||
E4 | 2.65±0.14* | 3.13±0.42 | 2.83±0.11 | 2.56~3.27 | 1.43 | 4.11 | ||
稻谷长宽比 | E1 | 3.55±0.27** | 2.29±0.13 | 3.49±0.19 | 2.62~3.78 | -1.91 | 4.62 | |
Length-width ratio | E2 | 3.47±0.12** | 2.31±0.23 | 3.14±0.16 | 2.42~3.38 | 1.60 | 3.70 | |
E3 | 3.78±0.11** | 2.42±0.19 | 3.41±0.19 | 2.71~3.71 | -1.59 | 2.73 | ||
E4 | 3.70±0.05** | 2.34±0.14 | 3.47±0.18 | 2.60~3.80 | -1.82 | 5.04 | ||
稻谷粒厚 | E1 | 2.26±0.09 | 2.17±0.05 | 2.19±0.05 | 2.04~2.34 | 0.07 | 0.64 | |
Grain thickness / mm | E2 | 2.14±0.10 | 2.09±0.06 | 2.18±0.05 | 2.05~2.33 | 0.20 | 0.12 | |
E3 | 2.09±0.05 | 2.19±0.09 | 2.12±0.06 | 1.93~2.24 | -0.54 | 0.05 | ||
E4 | 1.99±0.06 | 2.01±0.12 | 2.10±0.05 | 1.95~2.20 | -0.33 | 0.05 | ||
稻谷千粒重 | E1 | 31.02±2.37** | 22.44±1.69 | 29.51±2.29 | 22.17~34.21 | -0.64 | 0.70 | |
1000-grain weight / g | E2 | 31.36±3.06** | 22.26±2.01 | 29.63±1.97 | 23.24~34.90 | -0.40 | 0.77 | |
E3 | 30.39±2.74** | 21.86±1.49 | 27.39±2.42 | 19.71~33.65 | -0.21 | 0.48 | ||
E4 | 32.53±2.36** | 22.65±1.84 | 29.46±2.16 | 23.46~33.49 | -0.58 | 0.41 | ||
糙米长 | E1 | 6.87±0.31** | 4.88±0.36 | 6.91±0.23 | 6.14~7.30 | -1.50 | 2.67 | |
Brown rice length | E2 | 6.84±0.41** | 0.86±0.49 | 6.84±0.24 | 5.94~7.36 | -1.64 | 3.57 | |
/mm | E3 | 6.91±0.46** | 4.99±0.61 | 6.93±0.24 | 5.96~7.39 | -1.54 | 3.65 | |
E4 | 6.91±0.37** | 4.70±0.23 | 6.92±0.27 | 5.97~7.54 | -0.57 | 0.55 | ||
糙米宽 | E1 | 2.38±0.12* | 2.70±0.08 | 2.36±0.11 | 2.17~2.92 | 2.04 | 7.85 | |
Brown rice width | E2 | 2.27±0.14* | 2.67±0.13 | 2.52±0.09 | 2.31~3.01 | 1.90 | 9.25 | |
/mm | E3 | 2.32±0.19* | 2.78±0.05 | 2.40±0.09 | 2.16~2.79 | 1.50 | 5.41 | |
E4 | 2.46±0.11* | 2.75±0.06 | 2.36±0.11 | 2.07~2.89 | 1.17 | 4.67 | ||
糙米长宽比 | E1 | 2.98±0.21** | 1.87±0.19 | 2.95±0.17 | 2.17~3.21 | -1.67 | 3.84 | |
Length-to-width ratio | E2 | 2.94±0.23** | 1.84±0.17 | 2.72±0.14 | 2.11~2.99 | -1.56 | 4.07 | |
of brown rice | E3 | 2.98±0.31** | 1.81±0.16 | 2.91±0.15 | 2.33~3.15 | -1.53 | 3.09 | |
E4 | 2.76±0.27** | 1.86±0.19 | 2.95±0.14 | 2.26~3.16 | -1.95 | 5.56 | ||
糙米厚 | E1 | 1.93±0.10 | 2.07±0.06* | 1.93±0.05 | 1.79~2.10 | 0.14 | 0.66 | |
Thickness of brown rice | E2 | 1.90±0.01 | 2.12±0.04* | 1.91±0.05 | 1.77~2.08 | 0.36 | 1.48 | |
/ mm | E3 | 1.85±0.07 | 1.96±0.06* | 1.87±0.05 | 1.73~2.07 | 0.10 | 2.63 | |
E4 | 1.91±0.06 | 2.10±0.05* | 1.88±0.05 | 1.77~2.06 | 0.37 | 0.38 | ||
糙米千粒重 | E1 | 23.55±0.49* | 21.88±0.32 | 24.64±1.57 | 20.47~29.46 | 0.03 | 0.33 | |
1000-grain weight | E2 | 22.86±0.09* | 21.76±0.36 | 24.32±1.37 | 20.34~28.20 | -0.21 | 0.72 | |
of brown rice / g | E3 | 22.29±0.14* | 20.35±0.60 | 23.14±1.61 | 18.19~27.60 | -0.10 | 0.31 | |
E4 | 23.67±0.52* | 21.66±0.54 | 2.83±1.56 | 19.63~26.95 | -0.39 | 0.00 |
图1 9311/日本晴CSSLs群体中稻谷和糙米粒型和粒重相关性状分布
Fig. 1. Frequency distribution of grain shape and grain weight related traits of 9311/Nipponbare CSSLs population.
图2 四个不同环境下CSSL群体稻谷和糙米的粒重和粒型相关性状间的相关性分析 颜色越红,表明相关性系数r越接近1,呈正相关;反之颜色越蓝,表明r越接近-1,呈负相关。GL-粒长;GW-粒宽;GT-粒厚;LW-长宽比;TGW-千粒重;BRL-糙米长;BRW-糙米宽;BRLW-糙米长宽比;BRTW-糙米千粒重。
Fig. 2. Correlation analysis between grain weight and shape related traits in CSSLs population under four environments. The redder the color, the closer the correlation coefficient r is to 1, meaning positive correlation. On the contrary, the bluer the color, the closer the correlation coefficient r is to -1, the negative correlation. GL, Grain length; GW, Grain width; GT, Grain thickness; LW, Length to width ratio; TGW, 1000-grain weight; BRL, Brown rice length; BRW, Brown rice width; BRLW, Length to width ratio of brown rice; BRTW, 1000-grain weight of brown rice.
QTL | 区间 Interval | E1 | E2 | E3 | E4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOD | 加性效应Additive | 贡献率PVE/% | LOD | 加性效应Additive | 贡献率PVE/% | LOD | 加性效应Additive | 贡献率PVE/% | LOD | 加性效应Additive | 贡献率PVE/% | ||||||||||||||||
qGL2 | M123-M124 | 3.32 | -0.29 | 7.63 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qGL3.1 | M204-M205 | 6.61 | -0.48 | 17.64 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qGL3.2 | M217-M218 | 3.40 | -0.30 | 11.16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qGL3.3 | 6.90 | -0.43 | 17.02 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
qGL4.1 | M245-M246 | 3.01 | -0.38 | 7.48 | 3.04 | -0.34 | 6.94 | ||||||||||||||||||||
qGL4.2 | M255-M256 | 3.90 | -0.29 | 14.13 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qGW1 | M9-M10 | 3.25 | -0.07 | 5.10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qGW2.1 | M142-M143 | 10.44 | 0.10 | 15.05 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qGW2.2 | M157-M158 | 4.56 | 0.13 | 9.17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qGW5.2 | M334-M335 | 8.27 | 0.10 | 18.13 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qGW5.1 | M328-M329 | 13.14 | 0.14 | 35.23 | 21.04 | 0.16 | 38.10 | 12.77 | 0.12 | 30.29 | 22.19 | 0.20 | 51.01 | ||||||||||||||
qGW7 | M491-M492 | 8.05 | 0.11 | 19.41 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qGW8 | M537-M538 | 4.64 | -0.10 | 9.28 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qGW9 | M553-M554 | 8.72 | -0.11 | 12.15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qGW10 | M639-M640 | 3.89 | 0.10 | 6.24 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qLW2.1 | M136-M137 | 4.28 | -0.11 | 9.86 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qLW2.2 | M138-M139 | 5.24 | -0.10 | 9.74 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qLW3.2 | M204-M205 | 3.47 | -0.15 | 7.86 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qLW3.1 | M217-M218 | 10.41 | -0.23 | 21.53 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qLW3.3 | M220-M221 | 6.21 | -0.21 | 16.81 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qLW4.1 | M245-M246 | 3.04 | -0.16 | 5.40 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qLW4.2 | M255-M256 | 4.31 | -0.14 | 13.34 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qLW4.3 | M276-M277 | 3.14 | -0.10 | 7.07 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qLW5 | M328-M329 | 10.89 | -0.18 | 22.75 | 6.25 | -0.14 | 20.13 | 8.54 | -0.17 | 21.5 | 8.92 | -0.17 | 25.51 | ||||||||||||||
qLW7 | M491-M492 | 4.11 | -0.12 | 10.67 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qLW10.0 | M643-M644 | 3.58 | -0.12 | 6.44 | 4.42 | -0.15 | 10.21 | ||||||||||||||||||||
qGT1.1 | M89-M90 | 6.42 | -0.05 | 14.72 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qGT1.2 | M90-M91 | 3.52 | -0.04 | 10.40 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qGT4 | M260-M261 | 3.08 | -0.04 | 6.59 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qGT7.1 | M488-M489 | 3.18 | 0.06 | 10.01 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qGT7.2 | M483-M484 | 3.31 | 0.05 | 12.42 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qGT8.1 | M540-M541 | 3.23 | -0.04 | 10.17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qGT8.2 | M537-M538 | 7.02 | -0.09 | 16.30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qGT8.3 | M539-M540 | 4.89 | -0.04 | 15.12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qTGW2 | M153-M154 | 3.18 | 1.83 | 9.99 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qTGW3 | M204-M205 | 4.90 | -2.66 | 12.58 | 3.11 | -2.16 | 9.67 | ||||||||||||||||||||
qTGW4.1 | M299-M300 | 3.29 | -1.51 | 7.96 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qTGW4.2 | M308-M309 | 3.02 | -1.98 | 9.66 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qTGW5.1 | M363-M364 | 13.76 | -10.14 | 11.55 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qTGW5.2 | M374-M375 | 22.19 | 9.6 | 30.05 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qTGW8.2 | M537-M538 | 3.29 | -2.38 | 10.36 | 4.00 | -2.47 | 12.68 | ||||||||||||||||||||
qTGW8.1 | M540-M541 | 4.47 | -1.69 | 11.37 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRL1.1 | M61-M62 | 4.97 | -0.23 | 7.75 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRL1.2 | M84-M85 | 3.08 | 0.13 | 4.62 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRL2 | M123-M124 | 4.82 | -0.22 | 7.49 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRL3.3 | M193-M194 | 5.86 | -0.18 | 9.30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRL3.1 | M204-M205 | 3.84 | -0.27 | 12.54 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
QTL | 区间 Interval | E1 | E2 | E3 | E4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
LOD | 加性效应Additive | 贡献率PVE/% | LOD | 加性效应Additive | 贡献率PVE/% | LOD | 加性效应Additive | 贡献率PVE/% | LOD | 加性效应Additive | 贡献率PVE/% | ||||||||||||||||
qBRL3.2 | M217-M218 | 12.22 | -0.38 | 30.96 | 9.17 | -0.28 | 15.59 | ||||||||||||||||||||
qBRL4.1 | M245-M246 | 3.94 | -0.28 | 8.40 | 4.70 | -0.27 | 7.29 | 4.02 | -0.36 | 10.74 | |||||||||||||||||
qBRL5.1 | M336-M337 | 4.18 | -0.20 | 11.41 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRL8.1 | M537-M538 | 4.07 | -0.20 | 6.23 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRL8.2 | M549-M550 | 3.66 | -0.24 | 9.72 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRW2 | M143-M144 | 6.55 | 0.06 | 12.17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRW4 | M228-M229 | 3.44 | -0.08 | 10.98 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRW5.2 | M328-M329 | 16.82 | 0.11 | 38.80 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRW5.1 | M324-M325 | 5.62 | 0.10 | 19.85 | 15.31 | 0.12 | 43.56 | ||||||||||||||||||||
qBRW7 | M488-M489 | 4.60 | 0.10 | 10.46 | 5.16 | 0.16 | 17.04 | ||||||||||||||||||||
qBRW8.2 | M537-M538 | 4.39 | -0.07 | 7.82 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRLW2.2 | M136-M137 | 3.31 | -0.08 | 10.38 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRLW2.1 | M116-M117 | 3.33 | -0.08 | 6.32 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRLW3.1 | M217-M218 | 12.09 | -0.19 | 27.46 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRLW3.2 | M220-M221 | 6.22 | -0.18 | 20.65 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRLW5 | M324-M325 | 3.22 | -0.12 | 11.89 | 9.64 | -0.14 | 20.80 | ||||||||||||||||||||
qBRLW7.1 | M489-M490 | 5.23 | -0.19 | 19.91 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRLW7.2 | M488-M489 | 4.71 | -0.19 | 15.17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRT1 | M66-M67 | 5.70 | -0.05 | 12.94 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRT2 | M170-M171 | 4.45 | -0.04 | 10.26 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRT7.2 | M485-M486 | 5.09 | 0.05 | 11.41 | 4.33 | 0.06 | 13.69 | ||||||||||||||||||||
qBRT7.1 | M488-M489 | 4.59 | 0.07 | 16.39 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRT8 | M544-M545 | 4.98 | -0.05 | 11.25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRTW1 | M66-M67 | 3.84 | -1.35 | 9.09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRTW2 | M153-M154 | 3.02 | 1.07 | 7.01 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRTW3 | M204-M205 | 4.70 | -1.41 | 9.58 | 3.16 | -1.54 | 9.90 | ||||||||||||||||||||
qBRTW5.1 | M324-M325 | 6.81 | 1.24 | 14.48 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRTW8.2 | M537-M538 | 5.36 | -1.86 | 13.03 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRTW8.1 | M539-M540 | 4.27 | -1.17 | 8.79 | 4.77 | -1.38 | 15.64 | ||||||||||||||||||||
qBRTW11.1 | M652-M653 | 4.84 | -0.72 | 9.89 |
表2 利用CSSLs群体定位到的水稻粒型和粒重QTL
Table 2 QTL of rice grain shape and grain weight identified by CSSL population.
QTL | 区间 Interval | E1 | E2 | E3 | E4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOD | 加性效应Additive | 贡献率PVE/% | LOD | 加性效应Additive | 贡献率PVE/% | LOD | 加性效应Additive | 贡献率PVE/% | LOD | 加性效应Additive | 贡献率PVE/% | ||||||||||||||||
qGL2 | M123-M124 | 3.32 | -0.29 | 7.63 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qGL3.1 | M204-M205 | 6.61 | -0.48 | 17.64 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qGL3.2 | M217-M218 | 3.40 | -0.30 | 11.16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qGL3.3 | 6.90 | -0.43 | 17.02 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
qGL4.1 | M245-M246 | 3.01 | -0.38 | 7.48 | 3.04 | -0.34 | 6.94 | ||||||||||||||||||||
qGL4.2 | M255-M256 | 3.90 | -0.29 | 14.13 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qGW1 | M9-M10 | 3.25 | -0.07 | 5.10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qGW2.1 | M142-M143 | 10.44 | 0.10 | 15.05 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qGW2.2 | M157-M158 | 4.56 | 0.13 | 9.17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qGW5.2 | M334-M335 | 8.27 | 0.10 | 18.13 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qGW5.1 | M328-M329 | 13.14 | 0.14 | 35.23 | 21.04 | 0.16 | 38.10 | 12.77 | 0.12 | 30.29 | 22.19 | 0.20 | 51.01 | ||||||||||||||
qGW7 | M491-M492 | 8.05 | 0.11 | 19.41 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qGW8 | M537-M538 | 4.64 | -0.10 | 9.28 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qGW9 | M553-M554 | 8.72 | -0.11 | 12.15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qGW10 | M639-M640 | 3.89 | 0.10 | 6.24 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qLW2.1 | M136-M137 | 4.28 | -0.11 | 9.86 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qLW2.2 | M138-M139 | 5.24 | -0.10 | 9.74 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qLW3.2 | M204-M205 | 3.47 | -0.15 | 7.86 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qLW3.1 | M217-M218 | 10.41 | -0.23 | 21.53 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qLW3.3 | M220-M221 | 6.21 | -0.21 | 16.81 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qLW4.1 | M245-M246 | 3.04 | -0.16 | 5.40 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qLW4.2 | M255-M256 | 4.31 | -0.14 | 13.34 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qLW4.3 | M276-M277 | 3.14 | -0.10 | 7.07 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qLW5 | M328-M329 | 10.89 | -0.18 | 22.75 | 6.25 | -0.14 | 20.13 | 8.54 | -0.17 | 21.5 | 8.92 | -0.17 | 25.51 | ||||||||||||||
qLW7 | M491-M492 | 4.11 | -0.12 | 10.67 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qLW10.0 | M643-M644 | 3.58 | -0.12 | 6.44 | 4.42 | -0.15 | 10.21 | ||||||||||||||||||||
qGT1.1 | M89-M90 | 6.42 | -0.05 | 14.72 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qGT1.2 | M90-M91 | 3.52 | -0.04 | 10.40 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qGT4 | M260-M261 | 3.08 | -0.04 | 6.59 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qGT7.1 | M488-M489 | 3.18 | 0.06 | 10.01 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qGT7.2 | M483-M484 | 3.31 | 0.05 | 12.42 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qGT8.1 | M540-M541 | 3.23 | -0.04 | 10.17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qGT8.2 | M537-M538 | 7.02 | -0.09 | 16.30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qGT8.3 | M539-M540 | 4.89 | -0.04 | 15.12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qTGW2 | M153-M154 | 3.18 | 1.83 | 9.99 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qTGW3 | M204-M205 | 4.90 | -2.66 | 12.58 | 3.11 | -2.16 | 9.67 | ||||||||||||||||||||
qTGW4.1 | M299-M300 | 3.29 | -1.51 | 7.96 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qTGW4.2 | M308-M309 | 3.02 | -1.98 | 9.66 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qTGW5.1 | M363-M364 | 13.76 | -10.14 | 11.55 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qTGW5.2 | M374-M375 | 22.19 | 9.6 | 30.05 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qTGW8.2 | M537-M538 | 3.29 | -2.38 | 10.36 | 4.00 | -2.47 | 12.68 | ||||||||||||||||||||
qTGW8.1 | M540-M541 | 4.47 | -1.69 | 11.37 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRL1.1 | M61-M62 | 4.97 | -0.23 | 7.75 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRL1.2 | M84-M85 | 3.08 | 0.13 | 4.62 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRL2 | M123-M124 | 4.82 | -0.22 | 7.49 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRL3.3 | M193-M194 | 5.86 | -0.18 | 9.30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRL3.1 | M204-M205 | 3.84 | -0.27 | 12.54 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
QTL | 区间 Interval | E1 | E2 | E3 | E4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
LOD | 加性效应Additive | 贡献率PVE/% | LOD | 加性效应Additive | 贡献率PVE/% | LOD | 加性效应Additive | 贡献率PVE/% | LOD | 加性效应Additive | 贡献率PVE/% | ||||||||||||||||
qBRL3.2 | M217-M218 | 12.22 | -0.38 | 30.96 | 9.17 | -0.28 | 15.59 | ||||||||||||||||||||
qBRL4.1 | M245-M246 | 3.94 | -0.28 | 8.40 | 4.70 | -0.27 | 7.29 | 4.02 | -0.36 | 10.74 | |||||||||||||||||
qBRL5.1 | M336-M337 | 4.18 | -0.20 | 11.41 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRL8.1 | M537-M538 | 4.07 | -0.20 | 6.23 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRL8.2 | M549-M550 | 3.66 | -0.24 | 9.72 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRW2 | M143-M144 | 6.55 | 0.06 | 12.17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRW4 | M228-M229 | 3.44 | -0.08 | 10.98 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRW5.2 | M328-M329 | 16.82 | 0.11 | 38.80 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRW5.1 | M324-M325 | 5.62 | 0.10 | 19.85 | 15.31 | 0.12 | 43.56 | ||||||||||||||||||||
qBRW7 | M488-M489 | 4.60 | 0.10 | 10.46 | 5.16 | 0.16 | 17.04 | ||||||||||||||||||||
qBRW8.2 | M537-M538 | 4.39 | -0.07 | 7.82 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRLW2.2 | M136-M137 | 3.31 | -0.08 | 10.38 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRLW2.1 | M116-M117 | 3.33 | -0.08 | 6.32 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRLW3.1 | M217-M218 | 12.09 | -0.19 | 27.46 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRLW3.2 | M220-M221 | 6.22 | -0.18 | 20.65 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRLW5 | M324-M325 | 3.22 | -0.12 | 11.89 | 9.64 | -0.14 | 20.80 | ||||||||||||||||||||
qBRLW7.1 | M489-M490 | 5.23 | -0.19 | 19.91 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRLW7.2 | M488-M489 | 4.71 | -0.19 | 15.17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRT1 | M66-M67 | 5.70 | -0.05 | 12.94 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRT2 | M170-M171 | 4.45 | -0.04 | 10.26 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRT7.2 | M485-M486 | 5.09 | 0.05 | 11.41 | 4.33 | 0.06 | 13.69 | ||||||||||||||||||||
qBRT7.1 | M488-M489 | 4.59 | 0.07 | 16.39 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRT8 | M544-M545 | 4.98 | -0.05 | 11.25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRTW1 | M66-M67 | 3.84 | -1.35 | 9.09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRTW2 | M153-M154 | 3.02 | 1.07 | 7.01 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRTW3 | M204-M205 | 4.70 | -1.41 | 9.58 | 3.16 | -1.54 | 9.90 | ||||||||||||||||||||
qBRTW5.1 | M324-M325 | 6.81 | 1.24 | 14.48 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRTW8.2 | M537-M538 | 5.36 | -1.86 | 13.03 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
qBRTW8.1 | M539-M540 | 4.27 | -1.17 | 8.79 | 4.77 | -1.38 | 15.64 | ||||||||||||||||||||
qBRTW11.1 | M652-M653 | 4.84 | -0.72 | 9.89 |
染色体 Chr. | 区间 Marker interval | 多效性QTL Pleiotropic QTL | 已克隆基因 Cloned gene | 参考文献 Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | M66-M67 | qBRTW1, qBRT1 | PGL2 | Seonghoe et al. [ |
2 | M123-M124 | qGL2, qBRL2 | GW2 | Song et al. [ |
M136-M137 | qLW2.2, qBRLW2.2 | GS2 | Hu et al. [ | |
M153-M154 | qTGW2, qBRTW2 | |||
3 | M204-M205 | qGL3.1, qLW3.2, qTGW3, qBRTW3, qBRL3.1 | GS3 | Liu et al. [ |
M217-M218 | qGL3.2, qLW3.1, qBRL3.2, qBRLW3.1 | |||
M220-M221 | qGL3.3, qLW3.3, qBRLW3.2 | PGL1 | Dany H et al. [ | |
4 | M245-M246 | qGL4.1, qLW4.1, qBRL4.1 | GL4 | Wu et al. [ |
M255-M256 | qGL4.2, qLW4.2 | |||
5 | M328-M329 | qGW5.1, qLW5, qBRW5.2 | gw5 | Wan et al. [ |
M324-M325 | qBRW5.1, qBRLW5, qBRTW5.1 | |||
7 | M491-M492 | qGW7, qLW7 | GW7 | Wang et al. [ |
M488-M489 | qGT7.1, qBRW7, qBRLW7.2, qBRT7.1 | |||
8 | M537-M538 | qGW8, qGT8.2, qBRL8.1, qBRW8.2, qTGW8.2, qBRTW8.2 | GW8 | Wang et al. [ |
M539-M540 | qBRTW8.1, qGT8.3 | |||
M540-M541 | qTGW8.1, qGT8.1 |
表3 粒重和粒型QTL多效性区域分析
Table 3 Pleiotropic regional analysis of QTLs for grain shape and grain weight.
染色体 Chr. | 区间 Marker interval | 多效性QTL Pleiotropic QTL | 已克隆基因 Cloned gene | 参考文献 Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | M66-M67 | qBRTW1, qBRT1 | PGL2 | Seonghoe et al. [ |
2 | M123-M124 | qGL2, qBRL2 | GW2 | Song et al. [ |
M136-M137 | qLW2.2, qBRLW2.2 | GS2 | Hu et al. [ | |
M153-M154 | qTGW2, qBRTW2 | |||
3 | M204-M205 | qGL3.1, qLW3.2, qTGW3, qBRTW3, qBRL3.1 | GS3 | Liu et al. [ |
M217-M218 | qGL3.2, qLW3.1, qBRL3.2, qBRLW3.1 | |||
M220-M221 | qGL3.3, qLW3.3, qBRLW3.2 | PGL1 | Dany H et al. [ | |
4 | M245-M246 | qGL4.1, qLW4.1, qBRL4.1 | GL4 | Wu et al. [ |
M255-M256 | qGL4.2, qLW4.2 | |||
5 | M328-M329 | qGW5.1, qLW5, qBRW5.2 | gw5 | Wan et al. [ |
M324-M325 | qBRW5.1, qBRLW5, qBRTW5.1 | |||
7 | M491-M492 | qGW7, qLW7 | GW7 | Wang et al. [ |
M488-M489 | qGT7.1, qBRW7, qBRLW7.2, qBRT7.1 | |||
8 | M537-M538 | qGW8, qGT8.2, qBRL8.1, qBRW8.2, qTGW8.2, qBRTW8.2 | GW8 | Wang et al. [ |
M539-M540 | qBRTW8.1, qGT8.3 | |||
M540-M541 | qTGW8.1, qGT8.1 |
图4 水稻粒型性状QTL对应染色体片段置换系与背景亲本9311的表型差异比较
Fig. 4. Differences of phenotypic values of rice grain shape traits between genetic background parent 9311 and the CSSLs harboring the QTL alleles.
[1] | Bai X, Luo L, Yan W, Kovi M R, Zhan W, Xing Y. Genetic dissection of rice grain shape using a recombinant inbred line population derived from two contrasting parents and fine mapping a pleiotropic quantitative trait locus qGL7[J]. BMC Genetics, 2010,11(1):16. |
[2] | Xing Y, Zhang Q. Genetic and molecular bases of rice yield[J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2010,61(1):421-442. |
[3] | 袁隆平. 中国的杂交水稻[J]. 中国水稻科学, 1986,1(1):18. |
Yuan L P. Hybrid rice in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 1986,1(1):8-18. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 康雪蒙, 马梦影, 巩文靓, 段海燕. 水稻粒型基因研究进展及应用[J]. 农学学报, 2020,10(12):21-25. |
Kang X M, Ma M Y, Gong W J, Duan H Y. Rice grain shape genes: Research progress and application[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2020,10(12):21-25. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | Huang R Y, Jiang L R, Zheng J S, Wang T S, Wang H C, Huang Y M, Hong Z L. Genetic bases of rice grain shape: so many genes, so little known[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 2013,18(4):218-226. |
[6] | 张波, 裴瑞琴, 杨维丰, 朱海涛, 刘桂富, 张桂权, 王少奎. 利用单片段代换系鉴定巴西陆稻IAPAR9中的水稻粒型基因[J]. 作物学报, 2021,47(1):1472-1480. |
Zhang B, Pei R Q, Yang W F, Zhu H T, Liu G F, Zhang G Q, Wang S K. Mapping and identification QTL controlling grain size in rice (Oryza sativa L.) by using single segment substitution lines derived from IAPAR9[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021,47(1):1472-1480. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 孙滨, 占小登, 林泽川, 高志强, 于萍, 刘群恩, 沈希宏, 张迎信, 陈代波. 水稻粒形和粒重性状的相关性分析及QTL定位[J]. 分子植物育种, 2015,13(12):2663-2672. |
Sun B, Zhan X D, Lin Z C, Gao Z Q, Yu P, Liu Q E, Shen X H, Zhang Y X, Chen D B. Correlation analysis and QTL mapping of grain shape and grain weight in rice[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2015,13(12):2663-2672. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 郑跃滨, 李智, 赵海燕, 朱光枫, 廖芷依, 竺正航, 王兰. 水稻粒长QTL定位与主效基因的遗传分析[J]. 西北植物学报, 2020,40(4):598-604. |
Zheng Y B, Li Z, Zhao H Y, Zhu G F, Liao Z Y, Zhu Z H, Wang L. Mapping quantitative trait loci associated with grain length and genetic analysis of major quantitative loci in rice[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2020,40(4):598-604. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 姚国新, 李金杰, 张强, 胡广隆, 陈超, 汤波, 张洪亮, 李自超. 利用4个姊妹近等基因系群体定位水稻粒重和粒形QTL[J]. 作物学报, 2010,36(8):1310-1317. |
Yao G X, Li J J, Zhang Q, Hu G L, Chen C, Shang B, Zhang H L, Li Z C. Mapping QTL for grain weight and shape using four sisters near isogenic lines in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2010,36(8):1310-1317. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 谭耀鹏, 李兰芝, 李平, 王玲霞, 胡中立. 利用DH群体定位水稻谷粒外观性状的QTL[J]. 分子植物育种, 2005,3(3):314-322. |
Tan Y P, Li L Z, Li P, Wang L X, Hu Z L. Quantitative trait loci for grain appearance traits of rice using a doubled haploid population[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2005,3(3):314-322. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 康艺维, 陈玉宇, 张迎信. 水稻粒型基因克隆研究进展及育种应用展望[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020,34(6):479-490. |
Kang Y W, Chen Y Y, Zhang Y X. Research progress and breeding prospects of grain size associated genes in rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2020,34(6):479-490. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | Yan S, Zou G, Li S, Wang H, Liu H, Zhai G, Guo P, Song H, Yan C, Tao Y. Seed size is determined by the combinations of the genes controlling different seed characteristics in rice[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2011,123(7):1173-1181. |
[13] | Liu Q, Han R, Wu K, Zhang J, Ye Y, Wang S, Chen J, Pan Y, Li Q, Xu X, Zhou J, Tao D, Wu Y, Fu X. G-protein βγ subunits determine grain size through interaction with MADS-domain transcription factors in rice[J]. Nature Communications, 2018,9(1):852. |
[14] | Ishimaru K, Hirotsu N, Madoka Y, Murakami N, Hara N, Onodera H, Kashiwagi T, Ujiie K, Shimizu B I, Onishi A, Miyagawa H, Katoh E. Loss of function of the IAA-glucose hydrolase gene TGW6 enhances rice grain weight and increases yield[J]. Nature Genetics, 2013,45(6):707-711. |
[15] | Song X J, Kuroha T, Ayano M, Ashikari M. Rare allele of a previously unidentified histone H4 acetyltransferase enhances grain weight, yield, and plant biomass in rice[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015,112(1):76. |
[16] | Huang K, Wang D, Duan P, Zhang B, Xu R, Li N, Li Y. WIDE AND THICK GRAIN 1, which encodes an otubain- like protease with deubiquitination activity, influences grain size and shape in rice. Plant Journal, 2017,91(5):849-860. |
[17] | Wang Y. Copy number variation at the GL7 locus contributes to grain size diversity in rice. Nature Genetics, 2015,47(8):944-948. |
[18] | Wan X Y, Wan J M, Weng J F, Jiang L, Bi J C, Wang C M, Zhai H Q. Stability of QTL for rice grain dimension and endosperm chalkiness characteristics across eight environments. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2005,110(7):1334-1346. |
[19] | Wu G L, Deng H D, Yu M X, Cai Y C, Zhou D H, Tan J A, Yu J F, Luo X, Tong S, Wang P, Zhang X Y, Li C J, Li C J, Wang Y N, Cheng Q, He H H, Bian J M. Genetic analysis of rice seed recovery under low-temperature conditions using a new CSSL population with a high-density genetic map in rice. Molecular Breeding, 2020,40(12):109. |
[20] | McCouch S R. Gene nomenclature system for rice. Rice, 2008,1(1):72-84. |
[21] | Jang S, An G, Li H Y. Rice leaf angle and grain size are affected by the OsBUL1 transcriptional activator complex. Plant Physiology, 2017,173(1):688-702. |
[22] | Hu J, Wang Y, Fang Y, Zeng L, Xu J, Yu H, Shi Z, Pan J, Zhang D, Kang S, Zhu L, Dong G, Guo L, Zeng D, Zhang G, Xie L, Xiong G, Li J, Qian Q. A rare allele of GS2 enhances grain size and grain yield in rice. Molecular Plant, 2015,8(10):1455-1465. |
[23] | Heang D, Sassa H. Antagonistic actions of HLH/bHLH proteins are involved in grain length and weight in rice. PLoS One, 2012,7(2):e31325. |
[24] | Wu W, Liu X Y, Wang M H, Meyer R S, Ndjiondjop M N, Tan L B, Zhang J W, Wu J Z, Cai H W, Sun C Q, Wang X K, Wing R A, Zhu Z F. A single-nucleotide polymorphism causes smaller grain size and loss of seed shattering during African rice domestication. Nature Plants, 2017,3(6):17064. |
[25] | Wang S, Li S, Liu Q, Wu K, Zhang J, Wang S, Engineering I O, Wang Y, Chen X, Zhang Y, Gao C, Wang F, Huang H, Fu X. The OsSPL16-GW7 regulatory module determines grain shape and simultaneously improves rice yield and grain quality[J]. Nature Genetics, 2015,47(8):949-954. |
[26] | Wang S, Wu K, Yuan Q, Liu X, Liu Z, Lin X, Zeng R, Zhu H, Dong G, Qian Q, Zhang G, Fu X. Control of grain size, shape and quality by OsSPL16 in rice[J]. Nature Genetics, 2012,44(8):950-954. |
[27] | 王小雷, 李炜星, 曾博虹, 孙晓棠, 欧阳林娟, 陈小荣, 贺浩华, 朱昌兰. 基于染色体片段置换系对水稻粒形及千粒重QTL检测与稳定性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2020,46(10):1517-1525. |
Wang X L, Li H X, Zeng B H, Sun X T, OuYang L J, Chen X R, He H H, Zhu C L. QTL detection and stability analysis of rice grain shape and thousand-grain weight based on chromosome segment substitution lines[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020,46(10):1517-1525. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | Xia D, Zhou H, Liu R. GL3.3, a novel QTL encoding a GSK3/SHAGGY-like kinase, epistatically interacts with GS3 to form extra-long grains in rice[J]. Molecular Plant, 2018,11(5):754-756. |
[29] | Fan C, Xing Y, Mao H, Lu T, Han B, Xu C, Li X, Zhang Q. GS3, a major QTL for grain length and weight and minor QTL for grain width and thickness in rice, encodes a putative transmembrane protein[J]. Theoretical & Applied Genetics, 2006,112(6):1164-1171. |
[30] | Ma X, Cheng Z, Qin R, Qiu Y, Heng Y, Yang H, Ren Y, Wang X, Bi J, Ma X, Zhang X, Wang J, Lei C, Guo X, Wang J, Wu F, Jiang L, Wang H, Wan J. OsARG encodes an arginase that plays critical roles in panicle development and grain production in rice[J]. Plant Journal, 2013,73(2):190-200. |
[31] | Kesavan M, Song J T, Seo H S. Seed size: A priority trait in cereal crops[J]. Physiologia Plantarum, 2013,147(2):113-120. |
[32] | Xu F, Fang J, Ou S, Gao S, Zhang F, Du L, Xiao Y, Wang H, Sun X, Chu J, Wang G, Chu C. Variations in CYP78A13 coding region influence grain size and yield in rice[J]. Plant Cell & Environment, 2015,38(4):800-811. |
[33] | Kang Y J, Shim K C, Lee H S, Jeon Y A, Kim S H, Kang J W, Yun Y T, Park I K, Ahn S N. Fine mapping and candidate gene analysis of the quantitative trait locus gw8.1 associated with grain length in rice[J]. Genes & Genomics, 2018,40(4):389-397. |
[34] | Wang Z, Chen J Y, Zhu Y J. Validation of qGS10, a quantitative trait locus for grain size on the long arm of chromosome 10 in rice(Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2017,16(1):16-26. |
[1] | 郭展, 张运波. 水稻对干旱胁迫的生理生化响应及分子调控研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 335-349. |
[2] | 韦还和, 马唯一, 左博源, 汪璐璐, 朱旺, 耿孝宇, 张翔, 孟天瑶, 陈英龙, 高平磊, 许轲, 霍中洋, 戴其根. 盐、干旱及其复合胁迫对水稻产量和品质形成影响的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 350-363. |
[3] | 许丹洁, 林巧霞, 李正康, 庄小倩, 凌宇, 赖美玲, 陈晓婷, 鲁国东. OsOPR10正调控水稻对稻瘟病和白叶枯病的抗性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 364-374. |
[4] | 丁正权, 潘月云, 施扬, 黄海祥. 基于基因芯片的嘉禾系列长粒优质食味粳稻综合评价与比较[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 397-408. |
[5] | 候小琴, 王莹, 余贝, 符卫蒙, 奉保华, 沈煜潮, 谢杭军, 王焕然, 许用强, 武志海, 王建军, 陶龙兴, 符冠富. 黄腐酸钾提高水稻秧苗耐盐性的作用途径分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 409-421. |
[6] | 吕宙, 易秉怀, 陈平平, 周文新, 唐文帮, 易镇邪. 施氮量与移栽密度对小粒型杂交水稻产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 422-436. |
[7] | 胡继杰, 胡志华, 张均华, 曹小闯, 金千瑜, 章志远, 朱练峰. 根际饱和溶解氧对水稻分蘖期光合及生长特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 437-446. |
[8] | 刘福祥, 甄浩洋, 彭焕, 郑刘春, 彭德良, 文艳华. 广东省水稻孢囊线虫病调查与鉴定[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 456-461. |
[9] | 陈浩田, 秦缘, 钟笑涵, 林晨语, 秦竞航, 杨建昌, 张伟杨. 水稻根系和土壤性状与稻田甲烷排放关系的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 233-245. |
[10] | 缪军, 冉金晖, 徐梦彬, 卜柳冰, 王平, 梁国华, 周勇. 过量表达异三聚体G蛋白γ亚基基因RGG2提高水稻抗旱性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 246-255. |
[11] | 尹潇潇, 张芷菡, 颜绣莲, 廖蓉, 杨思葭, 郭岱铭, 樊晶, 赵志学, 王文明. 多个稻曲病菌效应因子的信号肽验证和表达分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 256-265. |
[12] | 朱裕敬, 桂金鑫, 龚成云, 罗新阳, 石居斌, 张海清, 贺记外. 全基因组关联分析定位水稻分蘖角度QTL[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 266-276. |
[13] | 魏倩倩, 汪玉磊, 孔海民, 徐青山, 颜玉莲, 潘林, 迟春欣, 孔亚丽, 田文昊, 朱练峰, 曹小闯, 张均华, 朱春权. 信号分子硫化氢参与硫肥缓解铝对水稻生长抑制作用的机制[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 290-302. |
[14] | 周甜, 吴少华, 康建宏, 吴宏亮, 杨生龙, 王星强, 李昱, 黄玉峰. 不同种植模式对水稻籽粒淀粉含量及淀粉关键酶活性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 303-315. |
[15] | 关雅琪, 鄂志国, 王磊, 申红芳. 影响中国水稻生产环节外包发展因素的实证研究:基于群体效应视角[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 324-334. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||