水稻回交群体剑叶性状综合评价及QTL定位

doi:10.16819/j.1001-7216.2021.210110

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】通过对水稻剑叶性状的综合评价,明确剑叶相关性状间及与6个农艺性状的关系。检测剑叶相关性状的QTL,为优良株型品种选育,剑叶性状基因的精细定位和克隆奠定基础。【方法】以日本优质粳稻品种越光和葡萄牙粳稻地方种Bertone构建的回交群体两个世代为实验材料,利用BC₃F₁群体基因型构建遗传连锁图谱;测定亲本和BC₃F₂群体各株系剑叶SPAD、剑叶长、剑叶宽,计算剑叶长宽比、剑叶面积;利用隶属函数和标准差系数赋予权重法获得剑叶性状综合评价值(D值),分析其与6个农艺性状间的关系。分别利用单标记分析(SPA)和区间作图(IM)检测水稻剑叶相关性状QTL。【结果】在抽穗灌浆期,两亲本剑叶SPAD值呈现先升高后降低的动态变化。BC₃F₂群体的5个剑叶相关性状变异丰富,总体表现趋向轮回亲本越光。4个剑叶形态性状间相关性均达到极显著水平,与剑叶SPAD的相关性不显著。主成分和逐步线性回归分析表明剑叶宽、剑叶SPAD、剑叶长、剑叶面积是影响剑叶综合评价值(D值)的主要因子。高D值株系的株高、穗长、茎基粗和单株产量均极显著高于低D值株系,两者的分蘖数和有效穗数差异不显著。共检测到18个控制剑叶性状的QTL,分布在水稻第1、4、7和8染色体上,贡献率分布范围为4.00%~28.00%(SPA)和3.41%~27.00%(IM),除qFLSPAD1之外的17个QTL增效基因均来自Bertone。在第8染色体上的RM22720-RM404区间发现1个QTL簇,含6个主效QTL,分别为qFLL8.1、qFLL8.2、qFLA8.1、qFLA8.2、qD8.1和qD8.2。【结论】获得了剑叶宽、剑叶SPAD、剑叶长和剑叶面积4个评价剑叶性状的关键指标;明确了剑叶性状与单株产量之间的正相关关系;检测到18个剑叶相关性状QTL,位于第8染色体RM22720-RM404区间的QTL簇,是影响剑叶性状的1个重要染色体区域。

关键词: 水稻, 回交群体, 剑叶性状, 综合评价, QTL定位

Abstract:

【Objective】In order to clarify the correlations between flag leaf-related traits and their relationships with six agronomic traits, a comprehensive evaluation of flag leaf traits was made. The identification of QTLs associated with flag leaf traits will lay a foundation for fine mapping and cloning of the functional genes underlying rice flag leaf-related traits, which is helpful to breed elite cultivars with excellent flag leaf traits. 【Method】A backcross population with two generations derived from an elite japonica rice cultivar Koshihikari (recipient) and a Portuguese rice landrace Bertone (donor) was used as plant materials. The genetic linkage maps were constructed by using SSR markers with the BC₃F₁population. Several parameters including flag leaf SPAD, flag leaf length, flag leaf width, length to width ratio of flag leaf as well as flag leaf area were measured in the parental varieties and BC₃F₂ population. In order to analyze the relationship between D value and the six agronomic traits, membership functions and the index weight method were used to comprehensively evaluate the flag leaf traits of these 260 BC₃F₂ lines. Single-point analysis (SPA) and interval mapping (IM) were used to identify QTLs for traits related to flag leaf in rice.【Result】After the flag leaf was fully expanded, the flag leaf SPAD values of the two parents showed a dynamic change, increasing at first and reduced subsequently. The five flag leaf-related traits of the BC₃F₂population exhibited diverse phenotypic variations, whose overall performance resembled the recurrent parent (Koshihikari). The results revealed that four morphological traits of flag leaf were significantly correlated with each other, while there were no significant correlations with flag leaf SPAD. Using principal component analysis (PCA) and stepwise regression analysis, flag leaf width, flag leaf SPAD, flag leaf length and flag leaf area were selected as the key indexes of D value out of the flag leaf comprehensive evaluation. The results showed that except for tiller number and effective panicle number, the other four traits including plant height, panicle length, basal culm thickness and grain yield per plant were all significantly higher in lines with a higher D value than that in lines with a small D value. A total of 18 QTLs were detected, which were located on chromosomes 1, 4, 7 and 8 with phenotypic variation explained ranging from 4.00% to 28.00% (SPA) and 3.41% to 27.00% (IM), respectively. Except for qFLSPAD1, the other 17 QTLs showed synergistic effect from Bertone alleles. Moreover, a QTL cluster was found in the RM22720–RM404 interval on chromosome 8, containing six major QTLs(qFLL8.1, qFLL8.2, qFLA8.1, qFLA8.2, qD8.1 and qD8.2). 【Conclusion】Flag leaf width, flag leaf SPAD, flag leaf length and flag leaf area were the important indicators that affect the comprehensive evaluation of flag leaf. The flag leaf traits were significantly or extremely significantly positively correlated with the yield per plant. Here we identified 18 QTLs for flag leaf traits and a QTL cluster detected in the RM22720–RM404 interval on chromosome 8, which is an important chromosomal region affecting flag leaf-related traits.

Key words: rice, backcross population, flag leaf traits, comprehensive evaluation, QTL mapping

李杰, 田蓉蓉, 白天亮, 朱春艳, 宋佳伟, 田蕾, 马帅国, 吕建东, 胡慧, 王震宇, 罗成科, 张银霞, 李培富. 水稻回交群体剑叶性状综合评价及QTL定位[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(6): 573-585.

Jie LI, Rongrong TIAN, Tianliang BAI, Chunyan ZHU, Jiawei SONG, Lei TIAN, Shuaiguo MA, Jiandong LÜ, Hui HU, Zhenyu WANG, Chengke LUO, Yinxia ZHANG, Peifu LI. Comprehensive Evaluation and QTL Analysis for Flag Leaf Traits Using a Backcross Population in Rice[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2021, 35(6): 573-585.

图/表 11

参考文献 45

[1]	李可, 禹晴, 徐云姬, 杨建昌. 水稻叶片早衰突变体的农艺与生理性状研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(2): 104-114.
	Li K, Yu Q, Xu Y J, Yang J C.Research progress in agronomic and physiological traits of early leaf senescence mutants in rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2020, 34(2): 104-114. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	Lü W K, Hu H, He L P, Zhang X C, Ou X X, Chen H Y, Yu S B, Xu J L, Qiu X J, Li Z X, Xu J Y, Wang X Y, Liu Z Y, Wang C R, Jiang J F, Lou J.Characterization and fine mapping of two white panicle genes with duplicated effect in rice[J]. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 2018, 20: 2805-2811.
[3]	童汉华, 梅捍卫, 邢永忠, 曹一平, 余新桥, 章善庆, 罗利军. 水稻生育后期剑叶形态和生理特性的QTL定位[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2007, 21(5): 493-499.
	Tong H H, Mei H W, Xing Y Z, Cao Y P, Yu X Q, Zhang S Q, Luo L J.QTL analysis for morphological and physiological characteristics of flag leaf at the late developmental stage in rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2007, 21(5): 493-499. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	Zhang B, Ye W J, Ren D Y, Tian P, Peng Y L, Gao Y, Ruan B P, Wang L, Zhang G H, Guo L B, Qian Q, Gao Z Y.Genetic analysis of flag leaf size and candidate genes determination of a major QTL for flag leaf width in rice[J]. Rice, 2015, 8(1):1-10.
[5]	Shen B, Yu W D, Zhu Y J, Fan Y Y, Zhuang J Y.Fine mapping of a major quantitative trait locus, qFLL6.2, controlling flag leaf length and yield traits in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Euphytica, 2012, 184(1): 57-64.
[6]	朱双兵, 吕文恺, 何丽萍, 邢丹英, 杨隆维, 邱先进, 徐建龙. 全基因组关联分析解析水稻剑叶及单株产量的遗传基础[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2020, 21(3): 663-673.
	Zhu S B, Lü W K, He L P, Xing D Y, Yang L W, Qiu X J, Xu J L.Genetic dissection of flag leaf related traits and grain yield per plant using genome-wide association analysis[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2020, 21(3): 663-673. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	Ye W J, Hu S K, Wu L W, Ge C W, Cui Y T, Chen P, Xu J, Dong G J, Guo L B, Qian Q.Fine mapping a major QTL qFCC7L for chlorophyll content in rice (Oryza sativa L.) cv. PA64s[J]. Plant Growth Regulation, 2017, 81(1): 81-90.
[8]	周勇, 陶亚军, 姚锐, 李畅, 谭文琛, 裔传灯, 龚志云, 梁国华. 利用染色体片段代换系定位水稻叶片形态性状QTL[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(11): 1650-1657.
	Zhou Y, Tao Y J, Yao R, Li C, Tan W C, Yi C D, Gong Z Y, Liang G H.QTL mapping for leaf morphological traits of rice using chromosome segment substitution lines[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2017, 43(11): 1650-1657. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	胡娟, 林晗, 徐娜, 焦然, 戴志俊, 鲁草林, 饶玉春, 王跃星. 水稻叶倾角分子机制及育种应用的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(5): 391-400.
	Hu J, Lin H, Xu N, Jiao R, Dai Z J, Lu C L, Rao Y C, Wang Y X.Advances in molecular mechanisms of rice leaf inclination and its application in breeding[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2019, 33(5): 391-400. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	朱长丰, 梁利君, 曾思远, 李天伟, 董冠杉, 洪德林. 水稻剑叶角度qFla-8-2位点的精细定位[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2016, 30(1): 27-34.
	Zhu C F, Liang L J, Zeng S Y, Li T W, Dong G S, Hong D L.Fine mapping of qFla-8-2 for flag leaf angle in rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2016, 30(1): 27-34. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	张孝波, 谢佳, 张晓琼, 田维江, 何沛龙, 刘思岑, 何光华, 钟秉强, 桑贤春. 水稻矮化剑叶卷曲突变体dcfl1的鉴定与基因精细定位[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(9): 1551-1558.
	Zhang X B, Xie J, Zhang X Q, Tian W J, He P L, Liu S C, He G H, Zhong B Q, Sang X C.Identification and gene mapping of a dwarf and curled flag leaf mutant dcfl1 in rice[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(9): 1551-1558. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	阿加拉铁, 曾龙军, 薛大伟, 胡江, 曾大力, 高振宇, 郭龙彪, 李仕贵, 钱前. 水稻灌浆期不同阶段叶绿素含量的QTL分析[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(1): 61-66.
	A J L T, Zeng L J, Xue D W, Hu J, Zeng D L, Gao Z Y, Guo L B, Li S G, Qian Q. QTL analysis for chlorophyll content in four grain-filling stage in rice[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008, 34(1): 61-66. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	周丽慧, 赵春芳, 赵凌, 张亚东, 朱镇, 陈涛, 赵庆勇, 姚姝, 于新, 王才林. 利用染色体片段置换系群体检测水稻叶片形态QTL[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2013, 27(1): 26-34.
	Zhou L H, Zhao C F, Zhao L, Zhang Y D, Zhu Z, Chen T, Zhao Q Y, Yao S, Yu X, Wang C L.QTL detection for leaf morphology of rice using chromosome segment substitution lines[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2013, 27(1): 26-34. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	张强, 陈凯, 梁云涛, 章禄标, 郑天清, 徐建龙, 张文忠, 黎志康. 利用双向导入系剖析水稻源、库相关性状的QTL[J]. 核农学报, 2013, 27(3): 261-271.
	Zhang Q, Chen K, Liang Y T, Zhang L B, Zheng T Q, Xu J L, Zhang W Z, Li Z K.QTL mapping of sink-source related traits using two sets of reciprocal introgression lines in rice[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 27(3): 261-271. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	王兰, 黄李超, 代丽萍, 杨窑龙, 徐杰, 冷语佳, 张光恒, 胡江, 朱丽, 高振宇, 董国军, 郭龙彪, 钱前, 曾大力. 利用日本晴/9311重组自交系群体定位水稻成熟期叶形相关性状QTL[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2014, 28(6): 589-597.
	Wang L, Huang L C, Dai L P, Yang Y L, Xu J, Leng Y J, Zhang G H, Hu J, Zhu L, Gao Z Y, Dong G J, Guo L B, Qian Q, Zeng D L.QTL analysis for rice leaf morphology at maturity stage using a recombinant inbred line population derived from a cross between Nipponbare and 9311[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2014, 28(6): 589-597. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	彭伟业, 孙平勇, 潘素君, 李魏, 戴良英. 水稻品种魔王谷粒形、剑叶性状和株高QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(11): 1673-1680.
	Peng W Y, Sun P Y, Pan S J, Li W, Dai L Y.Mapping QTLs for grain shape, flag leaf traits, and plant height in rice variety Mowanggu[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(11): 1673-1680. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	Chen M L, Luo J, Shao G N, Wei X J, Tang S Q, Sheng Z H, Song J, Hu P S.Fine mapping of a major QTL for flag leaf width in rice, qFLW4 , which might be caused by alternative splicing of NAL1[J]. Plant Cell Reports, 2012, 31(5): 863-872.
[18]	Farooq M, Tagle A G, Santos R E, Ebron L A, Kobayashi N.Quantitative trait loci mapping for leaf length and leaf width in rice cv. IR64 derived lines[J]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2010, 52(6): 578-584.
[19]	Tian Y H, Zhang H Y, Xu P Z, Chen X Q, Liao Y X, Han B L, Chen X B, Fu X D, Wu X J.Genetic mapping of a QTL controlling leaf width and grain number in rice[J]. Euphytica, 2015, 202(1): 1-11.
[20]	Bian J M, He H H, Shi H, Zhu G Q, Li C J, Zhu C L, Peng X S, Yu Q Y, Fu J R, He X P, Chen X R, Hu L F, Lin J, Ou-Yang L J. Quantitative trait loci mapping for flag leaf traits in rice using a chromosome segment substitution line population[J]. Plant Breeding, 2014, 133(2): 203-209.
[21]	Wang P, Zhou G L, Yu H H, Yu S B.Fine mapping a major QTL for flag leaf size and yield-related trait in rice[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2011, 123: 1319-1330.
[22]	谈聪, 翁小煜, 鄢文豪, 白旭峰, 邢永忠. 多效性基因Ghd7调控水稻剑叶面积[J]. 遗传, 2012, 34(7): 901-906.
	Tan C, Weng X Y, Yan W H, Bai X F, Xing Y Z.Ghd7, a pleiotropic gene controlling flag leaf area in rice[J]. Hereditas(Beijing), 2012, 34(7): 901-906. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	穆平, 李自超, 李春平, 张洪亮, 王象坤. 水、旱条件下水稻茎秆主要抗倒伏性状的QTL分析[J]. 遗传学报, 2004(7): 717-723.
	Mu P, Li Z C, Li C P, Zhang H L, Wang X K.QTL analysis for lodging resistance in rice using a DH population under lowland and upland ecosystems[J]. Acta Genetica Sinica, 2004(7): 717-723. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	田蕾, 陈亚萍, 刘俊, 马晓刚, 王娜, 杨兵, 李莹, 郭海东, 李娟, 胡慧, 张银霞, 李培富. 粳稻种质资源芽期耐盐性综合评价与筛选[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(6): 631-642.
	Tian L, Chen Y P, Liu J, Ma X G, Wang N, Yang B, Li Y, Guo H D, Li J, Hu H, Zhang Y X, Li P F.Comprehensive evaluation and selection of rice (Oryza sativa japonica) germplasm for saline tolerance at germination stage[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2017, 31(6): 631-642. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	王小雷, 李炜星, 曾博虹, 孙晓棠, 欧阳林娟, 陈小荣, 贺浩华, 朱昌兰. 基于染色体片段置换系对水稻粒形及千粒重QTL检测与稳定性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(10): 1517-1525.
	Wang X L, Li W X, Zeng B H, Sun X T, Ou-Yang L J, Chen X R, He H H, Zhu C L. QTL detection and stability analysis of rice grain shape and thousand-grain weight based on chromosome segment substitution lines[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(10): 1517-1525. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	张玲, 李晓楠, 王伟, 杨生龙, 李清, 王嘉宇. 水稻株型相关性状的QTL分析[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(12): 2128-2135.
	Zhang L, Li X N, Wang W, Yang S L, Li Q, Wang J Y.Analysis of QTLs for plant type traits in rice (Oryza sativa)[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2014, 40(12): 2128-2135. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	Fu Q, Zhang P J, Tan L B, Zhu Z F, Ma D, Fu Y C, Zhan X C, Cai H W, Sun C Q.Analysis of QTLs for yield-related traits in Yuanjiang common wild rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff.)[J]. Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 2010, 37(2): 147-157.
[28]	McCouch S R. Gene nomenclature system for rice[J]. Rice, 2008, 1(1): 72-84.
[29]	顾骏飞, 周振翔, 李志康, 戴琪星, 孔祥胜, 王志琴, 杨建昌. 水稻低叶绿素含量突变对光合作用及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(4): 551-560.
	Gu J F, Zhou Z X, Li Z K, Dai Q X, Kong X S, Wang Z Q, Yang J C.Effects of the mutant with low chlorophyll content on photosynthesis and yield in rice[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2016, 42(4): 551-560. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	Takai T, Kondo M, Yano M, Yamamoto T.A quantitative trait locus for chlorophyll content and its association with leaf photosynthesis in rice[J]. Rice, 2010, 3(2): 172-180.
[31]	殷延勃, 马洪文. 粳稻剑叶不同发育时期SPAD值遗传效应分析[J]. 西北农业学报, 2008, 17(5): 171-173, 193.
	Yin Y B, Ma H W.Analysis of genetic effects at different growth stages SPAD values in flag leaf of paddy rice[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2008, 17(5): 171-173, 193. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32]	Huang L C, Dai L P, Wang L, Leng Y J, Yang Y L, Xu J, Hu J, Rao Y C, Zhang G H, Zhu L, Dong G J, Guo L B, Qian Q, Zeng D L.Genetic dissection for chlorophyll content of the top three leaves during grain filling in rice ( Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2015, 34(2): 381-391.
[33]	胡茂龙, 王春明, 杨权海, 翟虎渠, 陆巍, 张荣铣, 万建民. 水稻光合功能相关性状QTL分析[J]. 遗传学报, 2005, 32(8): 818-824.
	Hu M L, Wang C M, Yang Q H, Zhai H Q, Lu W, Zhang R X, Wan J M.QTL analysis for traits associated with photosynthetic functions in rice (Oryza sativa L. )[J]. Acta Genetica Sinica, 2005, 32(8): 818-824. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34]	刘进, 王嘉宇, 姜树坤, 徐正进. 水稻叶绿素含量动态QTL分析[J]. 植物生理学报, 2012, 48(6): 577-583.
	Liu J, Wang J Y, Jiang S K, Xu Z J.Detection and analysis of dynamic QTL of leaf chlorophyll content in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J] Plant Physiology Journal, 2012, 48(6): 577-583. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[35]	Yue B, Xue W Y, Luo L J, Xing Y Z.QTL analysis for flag leaf characteristics and their relationships with yield and yield traits in rice[J]. Acta Genetica Sinica, 2006, 33(9): 824-832.
[36]	Jiang S K, Zhang X J, Wang J Y, Chen W F, Xu Z J.Fine mapping of the quantitative trait locus qFLL9 controlling flag leaf length in rice[J]. Euphytica, 2010, 176(3): 341-347.
[37]	Tang X X, Gong R, Sun W Q, Zhang C P, Yu S B.Genetic dissection and validation of candidate genes for flag leaf size in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2018, 131(4): 801-815.
[38]	Lin L H, Zhao Y F, Liu F, Chen Q, Qi J C.Narrow leaf 1 (NAL1) regulates leaf shape by affecting cell expansion in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2019, 516(3): 957-962.
[39]	Qi J, Qian Q, Bu Q Y, Li S Y, Chen Q, Sun J Q, Liang W X, Zhou Y H, Chu C C, Li X G, Ren F G, Palme K, Zhao B R, Chen J F, Chen M S, Li C Y.Mutation of the rice narrow leaf1 gene, which encodes a novel protein, affects vein patterning and polar auxin transport[J]. Plant Physiology, 2008, 147(4): 1947-1959.
[40]	Zhang G H, Li S Y, Wang L, Ye W J, Zeng D L, Rao Y C, Peng Y L, Hu J, Yang Y L, Xu J, Ren D Y, Gao Z Y, Zhu L, Dong G J, Hu X M, Yan M X, L, Guo L B, Li C Y, Qian Q. LSCHL4 from japonica cultivar, which is allelic to NAL1, increases yield of indica super rice 93-11[J]. Molecular Plant, 2014, 7(8): 1350-1364.
[41]	Xue W Y, Xing Y Z, Weng X Y, Zhao Y, Tang W J, Wang L, Zhou H J, Yu S B, Xu C G, Li X H, Zhang Q F.Natural variation in Ghd7 is an important regulator of heading date and yield potential in rice[J]. Nature Genetics, 2008, 40(6): 761-767.
[42]	邵高能, 唐绍清, 罗炬, 焦桂爱, 唐傲, 胡培松. 水稻剑叶形态与稻米粒形QTL分析及相应剩余杂合体衍生群体的构建[J]. 分子植物育种, 2009, 7(1): 16-22.
	Shao G N, Tang S Q, Luo J, Jiao G A, Tang A, Hu P S.QTL analysis for flag leaf and grain shape and populations construction derived from related residual heterozygous lines in rice[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2009, 7(1): 16-22. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[43]	吴亚辉, 陶星星, 肖武名, 郭涛, 刘永柱, 王慧, 陈志强. 水稻穗部性状的QTL分析[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(2): 214-221.
	Wu Y H, Tao X X, Xiao W M, Guo T, Liu Y Z, Wang H, Chen Z Q.Dissection of QTLs for panicle traits in rice (Oryza sativa)[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2014, 40(2): 214-221. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[44]	Wang P, Zhou G L, Cui K H, Li Z K, Yu S B.Clustered QTL for source leaf size and yield traits in rice ( Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Molecular Breeding, 2012, 29(1): 99-113.
[45]	Xu F F, Huang Y, Bao J S.Identification of QTLs for agronomic traits in indica rice using an RIL population[J]. Genes Genomics, 2015, 37(10): 809-817.

性状 Trait		亲本 Parent		世代 Generation	群体参数 Parameter of two populations
性状 Trait		越光Koshihikari	Bertone	世代 Generation	均值±标准差 Mean±SD	分布范围 Range	变异系数 CV/%	峰度 Kurtosis	偏度 Skewness
剑叶SPAD FLSPAD	35.67		44.06^**	BC₃F₁	41.16±3.60	32.40~52.50	8.75	0.18	0.31
剑叶SPAD FLSPAD				BC₃F₂	36.40±2.71	30.40~49.00	7.31	2.49	1.07
剑叶长 FLL/cm	29.28		35.38^*	BC₃F₁	30.16±5.18	15.83~44.53	17.18	-0.02	-0.24
剑叶长 FLL/cm				BC₃F₂	27.76±2.94	20.80~40.75	10.59	2.54	0.92
剑叶宽 FLW/cm	1.21		1.80^**	BC₃F₁	1.20±0.14	0.80~1.57	11.67	0.42	-0.30
剑叶宽 FLW/cm				BC₃F₂	1.21±0.08	1.00~2.00	5.00	45.09	5.13
剑叶长宽比 FLWR	24.20		19.66^*	BC₃F₁	25.30±4.43	13.61~42.10	17.51	1.24	0.60
剑叶长宽比 FLWR				BC₃F₂	23.07±2.43	16.00~33.96	10.64	1.66	0.45
剑叶面积FLA/cm²	26.57		47.76^**	BC₃F₁	27.32±6.23	9.50~46.27	22.80	0.11	-0.31
剑叶面积FLA/cm²				BC₃F₂	25.15±3.67	17.66~54.53	12.81	17.77	2.85

性状 Trait		亲本 Parent		世代 Generation	群体参数 Parameter of two populations
性状 Trait		越光Koshihikari	Bertone	世代 Generation	均值±标准差 Mean±SD	分布范围 Range	变异系数 CV/%	峰度 Kurtosis	偏度 Skewness
剑叶SPAD FLSPAD	35.67		44.06^**	BC₃F₁	41.16±3.60	32.40~52.50	8.75	0.18	0.31
剑叶SPAD FLSPAD				BC₃F₂	36.40±2.71	30.40~49.00	7.31	2.49	1.07
剑叶长 FLL/cm	29.28		35.38^*	BC₃F₁	30.16±5.18	15.83~44.53	17.18	-0.02	-0.24
剑叶长 FLL/cm				BC₃F₂	27.76±2.94	20.80~40.75	10.59	2.54	0.92
剑叶宽 FLW/cm	1.21		1.80^**	BC₃F₁	1.20±0.14	0.80~1.57	11.67	0.42	-0.30
剑叶宽 FLW/cm				BC₃F₂	1.21±0.08	1.00~2.00	5.00	45.09	5.13
剑叶长宽比 FLWR	24.20		19.66^*	BC₃F₁	25.30±4.43	13.61~42.10	17.51	1.24	0.60
剑叶长宽比 FLWR				BC₃F₂	23.07±2.43	16.00~33.96	10.64	1.66	0.45
剑叶面积FLA/cm²	26.57		47.76^**	BC₃F₁	27.32±6.23	9.50~46.27	22.80	0.11	-0.31
剑叶面积FLA/cm²				BC₃F₂	25.15±3.67	17.66~54.53	12.81	17.77	2.85

性状 Trait	剑叶SPAD FLSPAD	剑叶长 FLL	剑叶宽 FLW	剑叶长宽比 FLWR
剑叶长 Flag leaf length	0.089
剑叶宽 Flag leaf width	0.052	0.190^**
剑叶长宽比 Length to width ratio of flag leaf	0.069	0.897^**	-0.259^**
剑叶面积 Flag leaf area	0.094	0.913^**	0.569^**	0.641^**

性状 Trait	剑叶SPAD FLSPAD	剑叶长 FLL	剑叶宽 FLW	剑叶长宽比 FLWR
剑叶长 Flag leaf length	0.089
剑叶宽 Flag leaf width	0.052	0.190^**
剑叶长宽比 Length to width ratio of flag leaf	0.069	0.897^**	-0.259^**
剑叶面积 Flag leaf area	0.094	0.913^**	0.569^**	0.641^**

性状 Trait	CI1	CI2	CI3
剑叶SPAD Flag leaf SPAD	0.147	0.092	0.985
剑叶长 Flag leaf length	0.991	-0.123	-0.046
剑叶宽 Flag leaf width	0.306	0.948	-0.082
剑叶长宽比 Length to width ratio of flag leaf	0.838	-0.545	-0.004
剑叶面积 Flag leaf area	0.954	0.288	-0.074
特征值 Eigenvalue	2.709	1.302	0.984
贡献率 Contribution / %	54.171	26.043	19.683
累计贡献率Cumulative contribution / %	54.171	80.214	99.897