中国水稻科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 475-486.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2021.201109
王孟佳, 殷敏, 褚光, 刘元辉, 徐春梅, 章秀福, 王丹英, 陈松*()
收稿日期:
2020-11-30
修回日期:
2021-02-09
出版日期:
2021-09-10
发布日期:
2021-09-10
通讯作者:
陈松
基金资助:
Mengjia WANG, Min YIN, Guang CHU, Yuanhui LIU, Chunmei XU, Xiufu ZHANG, Danying WANG, Song CHENG*()
Received:
2020-11-30
Revised:
2021-02-09
Online:
2021-09-10
Published:
2021-09-10
Contact:
Song CHENG
摘要:
【目的】明确不同类型双季晚粳稻在长江中下游不同生态区产量表现、生育期及温光资源配置差异,为早籼-晚粳模式在长江中下游稻区应用提供理论依据。【方法】试验于2018–2019年在浙江富阳(30.13°N,海拔41.7 m)和温州(28.52°N,海拔83 m)开展。选择生产上大面积应用品种,以高产籼稻(IR)为对照,设置常规粳稻(IJR)和籼粳杂交稻(IJHR)2个处理。比较不同生态区晚季温光条件下籼稻、常规粳稻和籼粳杂交稻在产量、生育特性以及温光资源配置上的差异。【结果】1)低纬度下粳型水稻品种干物质量、有效穗数及库容较高纬度均有所下降,导致产量降低2.4%~19.1%;但结实率和千粒重稳定或略有提高。同时,籼粳杂交稻产量在两地均最高,分别为8.8~10.3 t/hm2(富阳)和8.0~10.2 t/hm2(温州);2)供试品种生育时期因纬度不同而存在差异。与高纬度相比,低纬度的水稻营养生长期无显著差异,穗发育期有所缩短(4.2%~27.3%),而灌浆期显著缩短,其中籼稻、常规粳稻以及籼粳杂交稻分别缩短7.3%~11.9%、20.8%~41.9%以及23.1%~35%。3)不同生育阶段温光配置差异主要体现在灌浆期,平均温度低纬度要高于高纬度(籼稻提高0.4~2.4 ℃;常规粳稻2.3~3.5 ℃;籼粳杂交稻2.5~2.8 ℃);有效积温纬度间的差异随品种类型而异,其中籼稻无显著变化,常规粳稻和籼粳杂交稻分别降低24.7~126.4 ℃和25.7~107 ℃。4)主成分分析表明,纬度变化造成的温光资源积累差异(PC1和PC2)是主因(贡献度49%),也是产量差异的主要原因;其次为品种的温光敏感性(PC5,贡献度18%)以及品种的穗粒结构(PC3,贡献度14%)。【结论】与高纬相比,低纬粳型水稻产量降低主要源于生育期缩短(灌浆期为主),有效积温减少,库容降低。籼粳杂交稻在低纬度仍具有较高的产量优势,可能源于其较强的穗粒优势。有鉴于此,重(大)穗型粳稻在长江中下游较低纬度双季晚稻种植可能更具有应用潜力。
王孟佳, 殷敏, 褚光, 刘元辉, 徐春梅, 章秀福, 王丹英, 陈松. 长江中下游双季晚粳稻产量、生育时期及温光资源配置的生态性差异[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(5): 475-486.
Mengjia WANG, Min YIN, Guang CHU, Yuanhui LIU, Chunmei XU, Xiufu ZHANG, Danying WANG, Song CHENG. Ecological Differences in Yield, Growth Period and the Utilization of Temperature and Light Resources of Double-cropping Late japonica Rice in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2021, 35(5): 475-486.
类型 Type | 品种 Cultivar | 参考区域 Reference area | 参考种植制度 Reference cropping system | 熟性 Maturity | 产量 Yield/(t·hm-2) | 生育期 Growth duration/d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IR | 黄华占Huanghuazhan | 长江流域Yangtze River Valley | 单季稻 SR | 早熟Early maturity | 7.97 | 127 |
天优华占Tianyouhuazhan | 长江流域Yangtze River Valley | 单季稻 SR | 早熟Early maturity | 7.54 | 123 | |
IJR | 嘉58 Jia 58 | 浙江省Zhejiang Province | 单季稻 SR | 中熟Medium maturity | 9.27 | 156 |
南粳46 Nanjing 46 | 上海Shanghai | 单季稻 SR | 中熟Medium maturity | 8.80 | 158 | |
宁粳4号Ningjing 4 | 江苏上海Jiangsu and Shanghai | 单季稻 SR | 中熟Medium maturity | 8.79 | 156 | |
秀水134 Xiushui 134 | 浙江省Zhejiang Province | 单季稻 SR | 中熟Medium maturity | 8.36 | 152 | |
IJHR | 甬优1540 Yongyou 1540 | 浙江省Zhejiang Province | 双季晚稻 DLR | 迟熟Late maturity | 10.27 | 145 |
甬优540 Yongyou 540 | 浙江省Zhejiang Province | 单季稻 SR | 中熟Medium maturity | 10.21 | 156 | |
甬优538 Yongyou 538 | 浙江省Zhejiang Province | 单季稻 SR | 中熟Medium maturity | 10.78 | 154 |
表1 2018–2019年试验品种信息
Table 1 Rice cultivars information from 2018 to 2019.
类型 Type | 品种 Cultivar | 参考区域 Reference area | 参考种植制度 Reference cropping system | 熟性 Maturity | 产量 Yield/(t·hm-2) | 生育期 Growth duration/d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IR | 黄华占Huanghuazhan | 长江流域Yangtze River Valley | 单季稻 SR | 早熟Early maturity | 7.97 | 127 |
天优华占Tianyouhuazhan | 长江流域Yangtze River Valley | 单季稻 SR | 早熟Early maturity | 7.54 | 123 | |
IJR | 嘉58 Jia 58 | 浙江省Zhejiang Province | 单季稻 SR | 中熟Medium maturity | 9.27 | 156 |
南粳46 Nanjing 46 | 上海Shanghai | 单季稻 SR | 中熟Medium maturity | 8.80 | 158 | |
宁粳4号Ningjing 4 | 江苏上海Jiangsu and Shanghai | 单季稻 SR | 中熟Medium maturity | 8.79 | 156 | |
秀水134 Xiushui 134 | 浙江省Zhejiang Province | 单季稻 SR | 中熟Medium maturity | 8.36 | 152 | |
IJHR | 甬优1540 Yongyou 1540 | 浙江省Zhejiang Province | 双季晚稻 DLR | 迟熟Late maturity | 10.27 | 145 |
甬优540 Yongyou 540 | 浙江省Zhejiang Province | 单季稻 SR | 中熟Medium maturity | 10.21 | 156 | |
甬优538 Yongyou 538 | 浙江省Zhejiang Province | 单季稻 SR | 中熟Medium maturity | 10.78 | 154 |
图2 2018–2019年浙江富阳和温州不同类型晚稻产量差异不同小写字母代表品种类型或纬度间显著性差异(P<0.05,邓肯新复极差法)。
Fig. 2. Differences in the yield of different types of late rice from 2018 to 2019 in Fuyang and Wenzhou, Zhejiang.Different lowercase letters represent significant difference between different types of late rice or latitudes in the same year (P<0.05, the Duncan’s New Multiple Range Test).
年份 Year | 类型 Type | 纬度 Latitude | 品种 Cultivar | 干物质量Biomass /(g·m-2) | 收获指数 Harvest index | 有效穗数Productive panicle per m2 | 每穗粒数 Spikelet number per panicle | 结实率 Seed setting rate/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | 库容 Sink /(×104·m-2) | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | IR | 富阳Fuyang | 黄华占Huanghuazhan | 1597±45 | 0.40±0.01 | 304±14 | 155±1 | 74.8±1.6 | 22.9±0.5 | 4.7±0.2 | |||||||||||||||||
天优华占Tianyouhuazhan | 1545±87 | 0.43±0.02 | 265±20 | 200±16 | 58.2±2.3 | 23.7±0.3 | 5.3±0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
温州Wenzhou | 黄华占Huanghuazhan | 1349±67 | 0.56±0.01 | 290±3 | 133±2 | 69.9±6.2 | 23.3±0.2 | 3.9±0.1 | |||||||||||||||||||
天优华占Tianyouhuazhan | 1113±55 | 0.47±0.02 | 257±16 | 162±4 | 53.7±2.9 | 24.8±0.3 | 4.2±0.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
IJR | 富阳Fuyang | 嘉58 Jia 58 | 1380±7 | 0.53±0.01 | 316±32 | 130±15 | 71.2±0.6 | 24.9±0.1 | 4.1±0.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
南粳46 Nanjing 46 | 1767±150 | 0.41±0.02 | 318±20 | 147±5 | 70.3±2.1 | 26.2±0.2 | 4.7±0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
宁粳4号Ningjing 4 | 1653±44 | 0.42±0.01 | 331±21 | 147±2 | 60.2±0.6 | 25.4±0.2 | 4.9±0.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
秀水134 Xiushui 134 | 1698±51 | 0.41±0.01 | 298±30 | 159±1 | 77.3±0.6 | 24.8±0.4 | 4.7±0.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
温州Wenzhou | 嘉58 Jia 58 | 1131±34 | 0.57±0 | 254±27 | 113±4 | 77.0±4.5 | 25.6±0.2 | 2.9±0.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
南粳46 Nanjing 46 | 1213±79 | 0.51±0.01 | 284±18 | 104±2 | 66.0±3.2 | 24.1±0.6 | 2.9±0.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
宁粳4号Ningjing 4 | 1104±52 | 0.43±0.01 | 230±7 | 97±0 | 76.9±0.7 | 24.5±0.3 | 2.2±0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
秀水134 Xiushui 134 | 1207±55 | 0.57±0.02 | 258±15 | 118±2 | 73.4±2.0 | 24.5±0.4 | 3.1±0.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
IJHR | 富阳Fuyang | 甬优1540 Yongyou 1540 | 1938±134 | 0.44±0.01 | 222±24 | 278±14 | 70.3±0.9 | 22.5±0.3 | 6.2±0.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
甬优538 Yongyou 538 | 1892±47 | 0.43±0 | 217±5 | 340±8 | 57.3±0.5 | 22.0±0.2 | 7.4±0.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
甬优540 Yongyou 540 | 1954±71 | 0.39±0 | 231±13 | 316±17 | 61.6±1.7 | 21.7±0.2 | 7.3±0.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
温州Wenzhou | 甬优1540 Yongyou 1540 | 1606±97 | 0.55±0.01 | 203±14 | 209±15 | 77.3±5.0 | 23.4±0.4 | 4.2±0.5 | |||||||||||||||||||
甬优538 Yongyou 538 | 1424±90 | 0.58±0.01 | 178±18 | 261±17 | 70.9±3.4 | 22.5±0.1 | 4.6±0.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
甬优540 Yongyou 540 | 1303±74 | 0.56±0.02 | 179±13 | 219±14 | 66.1±3.5 | 21.9±0.2 | 3.9±0.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
均值 | IR | 富阳 Fuyang | 1571 b | 0.42 c | 285 b | 177 c | 66.5 abc | 23.3 c | 5.0 b | ||||||||||||||||||
Average | 温州 Wenzhou | 1231 c | 0.52 b | 274 bc | 148 d | 61.8 c | 24.1 b | 4.0 d | |||||||||||||||||||
IJR | 富阳 Fuyang | 1624 b | 0.44 c | 316 a | 146 d | 69.8 ab | 25.3 a | 4.6 bc | |||||||||||||||||||
温州 Wenzhou | 1164 c | 0.52 ab | 257 c | 108 e | 73.3 a | 24.7 b | 2.8 e | ||||||||||||||||||||
IJHR | 富阳 Fuyang | 1928 a | 0.42 c | 223 d | 311 a | 63.1 bc | 22.1 d | 6.9 a | |||||||||||||||||||
温州 Wenzhou | 1444 c | 0.56 a | 187 e | 230 b | 71.4 a | 22.6 d | 4.3 cd | ||||||||||||||||||||
ANOVA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
品种类型 Type(T) | 28.36*** | 38.57*** | 28.59*** | 296.72*** | 29.20*** | 113.95*** | 37.38*** | ||||||||||||||||||||
纬度 Latitude(L) | 448.72*** | 788.59*** | 63.21*** | 350.11*** | 18.24** | 0.16 | 230.86** | ||||||||||||||||||||
T×L | 5.03** | 32.81*** | 3.42** | 10.53*** | 12.40*** | 17.12*** | 5.87** | ||||||||||||||||||||
2019 | IR | 富阳Fuyang | 黄华占Huanghuazhan | 1906±176 | 0.32±0.01 | 312±6 | 139±5 | 91.6±0.3 | 22.4±0.3 | 4.3±0.1 | |||||||||||||||||
天优华占Tianyouhuazhan | 1828±216 | 0.44±0.03 | 311±12 | 134±10 | 93.7±3.0 | 23.9±0.8 | 4.2±0.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
温州Wenzhou | 黄华占Huanghuazhan | 1434±157 | 0.43±0.03 | 278±23 | 148±7 | 92.6±0.3 | 20.6±0.1 | 4.1±0.3 | |||||||||||||||||||
天优华占Tianyouhuazhan | 1340±175 | 0.49±0.04 | 238±9 | 196±11 | 80.1±3.2 | 21.9±0.1 | 4.6±0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
IJR | 富阳Fuyang | 嘉58 Jia 58 | 1839±124 | 0.41±0.03 | 330±22 | 123±8 | 93.8±1.7 | 22.7±0.4 | 4.1±0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
南粳46 Nanjing 46 | 1561±119 | 0.46±0.02 | 370±18 | 91±1 | 93.9±0.8 | 25.7±0.6 | 3.4±0.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
宁粳4号Ningjing 4 | 1307±148 | 0.56±0.03 | 299±23 | 155±3 | 82.8±2.2 | 23.5±0.8 | 4.6±0.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
秀水134 Xiushui 134 | 1512±84 | 0.46±0.03 | 320±13 | 105±6 | 97.3±0.7 | 23.4±0 | 3.4±0.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
温州Wenzhou | 嘉58 Jia 58 | 1239±162 | 0.51±0.04 | 258±9 | 115±8 | 91.5±0 | 24.8±0.3 | 3.0±0.1 | |||||||||||||||||||
南粳46 Nanjing 46 | 1175±223 | 0.49±0.08 | 254±20 | 109±11 | 91.4±3.1 | 25.8±0.5 | 2.8±0.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
宁粳4号Ningjing 4 | 1020±68 | 0.59±0.09 | 240±4 | 131±3 | 84.5±0.3 | 23.5±0.4 | 3.2±0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
秀水134 Xiushui 134 | 1335±334 | 0.45±0.10 | 236±12 | 139±15 | 92.3±1.9 | 24.3±0.2 | 3.3±0.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
IJHR | 富阳Fuyang | 甬优1540 Yongyou 1540 | 1935±242 | 0.46±0.03 | 253±11 | 205±15 | 90.5±2.9 | 20.5±0.9 | 5.2±0.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
甬优538 Yongyou 538 | 1743±78 | 0.50±0.04 | 232±3 | 222±3 | 93.8±4.1 | 19.6±0.3 | 5.1±0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
甬优540 Yongyou 540 | 1869±41 | 0.45±0.01 | 243±8 | 228±5 | 90.4±2.1 | 19.1±0.9 | 5.5±0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
温州Wenzhou | 甬优1540 Yongyou 1540 | 1450±342 | 0.49±0.08 | 189±8 | 292±26 | 91.5±2.3 | 21.4±0.1 | 5.5±0.7 | |||||||||||||||||||
甬优538 Yongyou 538 | 1373±134 | 0.54±0.03 | 205±11 | 241±52 | 85.0±2.6 | 20.9±0.1 | 4.9±0.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||
甬优540 Yongyou 540 | 1491±227 | 0.46±0.03 | 185±5 | 249±9 | 87.1±0 | 20.8±0.4 | 4.6±0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
均值 | IR | 富阳 Fuyang | 1867 a | 0.38 b | 311 a | 136 d | 92.7 a | 23.2 b | 4.2 bc | ||||||||||||||||||
Average | 温州 Wenzhou | 1387 bc | 0.46 a | 258 b | 172 c | 86.4 b | 21.3 c | 4.4 b | |||||||||||||||||||
IJR | 富阳 Fuyang | 1555 b | 0.47 a | 330 a | 119 d | 91.9 a | 23.8 ab | 3.9 c | |||||||||||||||||||
温州 Wenzhou | 1192 c | 0.51 a | 247 b | 124 d | 89.9 ab | 24.6 a | 3.0 d | ||||||||||||||||||||
IJHR | 富阳 Fuyang | 1849 a | 0.47 a | 243 b | 218 b | 91.5 a | 19.7 d | 5.3 a | |||||||||||||||||||
温州 Wenzhou | 1438 b | 0.50 a | 193 c | 260 a | 87.9 ab | 21.0 c | 5.0 a | ||||||||||||||||||||
ANOVA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
品种类型 Type(T) | 5.17** | 9.06*** | 44.64*** | 76.55*** | 15.33*** | 93.88*** | 32.06*** | ||||||||||||||||||||
纬度 Latitude(L) | 62.63*** | 11.78** | 311.87*** | 31.50*** | 36.28*** | 7.38* | 16.40** | ||||||||||||||||||||
T×L | 0.66 | 1.32 | 5.83*** | 6.75*** | 8.26*** | 12.96*** | 4.92** |
表2 浙江富阳和温州不同类型晚稻产量构成差异
Table 2 Differences in yield components of different types of late rice in Fuyang and Wenzhou, Zhejiang in 2018 and 2019.
年份 Year | 类型 Type | 纬度 Latitude | 品种 Cultivar | 干物质量Biomass /(g·m-2) | 收获指数 Harvest index | 有效穗数Productive panicle per m2 | 每穗粒数 Spikelet number per panicle | 结实率 Seed setting rate/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | 库容 Sink /(×104·m-2) | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | IR | 富阳Fuyang | 黄华占Huanghuazhan | 1597±45 | 0.40±0.01 | 304±14 | 155±1 | 74.8±1.6 | 22.9±0.5 | 4.7±0.2 | |||||||||||||||||
天优华占Tianyouhuazhan | 1545±87 | 0.43±0.02 | 265±20 | 200±16 | 58.2±2.3 | 23.7±0.3 | 5.3±0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
温州Wenzhou | 黄华占Huanghuazhan | 1349±67 | 0.56±0.01 | 290±3 | 133±2 | 69.9±6.2 | 23.3±0.2 | 3.9±0.1 | |||||||||||||||||||
天优华占Tianyouhuazhan | 1113±55 | 0.47±0.02 | 257±16 | 162±4 | 53.7±2.9 | 24.8±0.3 | 4.2±0.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
IJR | 富阳Fuyang | 嘉58 Jia 58 | 1380±7 | 0.53±0.01 | 316±32 | 130±15 | 71.2±0.6 | 24.9±0.1 | 4.1±0.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
南粳46 Nanjing 46 | 1767±150 | 0.41±0.02 | 318±20 | 147±5 | 70.3±2.1 | 26.2±0.2 | 4.7±0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
宁粳4号Ningjing 4 | 1653±44 | 0.42±0.01 | 331±21 | 147±2 | 60.2±0.6 | 25.4±0.2 | 4.9±0.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
秀水134 Xiushui 134 | 1698±51 | 0.41±0.01 | 298±30 | 159±1 | 77.3±0.6 | 24.8±0.4 | 4.7±0.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
温州Wenzhou | 嘉58 Jia 58 | 1131±34 | 0.57±0 | 254±27 | 113±4 | 77.0±4.5 | 25.6±0.2 | 2.9±0.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
南粳46 Nanjing 46 | 1213±79 | 0.51±0.01 | 284±18 | 104±2 | 66.0±3.2 | 24.1±0.6 | 2.9±0.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
宁粳4号Ningjing 4 | 1104±52 | 0.43±0.01 | 230±7 | 97±0 | 76.9±0.7 | 24.5±0.3 | 2.2±0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
秀水134 Xiushui 134 | 1207±55 | 0.57±0.02 | 258±15 | 118±2 | 73.4±2.0 | 24.5±0.4 | 3.1±0.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
IJHR | 富阳Fuyang | 甬优1540 Yongyou 1540 | 1938±134 | 0.44±0.01 | 222±24 | 278±14 | 70.3±0.9 | 22.5±0.3 | 6.2±0.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
甬优538 Yongyou 538 | 1892±47 | 0.43±0 | 217±5 | 340±8 | 57.3±0.5 | 22.0±0.2 | 7.4±0.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
甬优540 Yongyou 540 | 1954±71 | 0.39±0 | 231±13 | 316±17 | 61.6±1.7 | 21.7±0.2 | 7.3±0.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
温州Wenzhou | 甬优1540 Yongyou 1540 | 1606±97 | 0.55±0.01 | 203±14 | 209±15 | 77.3±5.0 | 23.4±0.4 | 4.2±0.5 | |||||||||||||||||||
甬优538 Yongyou 538 | 1424±90 | 0.58±0.01 | 178±18 | 261±17 | 70.9±3.4 | 22.5±0.1 | 4.6±0.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
甬优540 Yongyou 540 | 1303±74 | 0.56±0.02 | 179±13 | 219±14 | 66.1±3.5 | 21.9±0.2 | 3.9±0.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
均值 | IR | 富阳 Fuyang | 1571 b | 0.42 c | 285 b | 177 c | 66.5 abc | 23.3 c | 5.0 b | ||||||||||||||||||
Average | 温州 Wenzhou | 1231 c | 0.52 b | 274 bc | 148 d | 61.8 c | 24.1 b | 4.0 d | |||||||||||||||||||
IJR | 富阳 Fuyang | 1624 b | 0.44 c | 316 a | 146 d | 69.8 ab | 25.3 a | 4.6 bc | |||||||||||||||||||
温州 Wenzhou | 1164 c | 0.52 ab | 257 c | 108 e | 73.3 a | 24.7 b | 2.8 e | ||||||||||||||||||||
IJHR | 富阳 Fuyang | 1928 a | 0.42 c | 223 d | 311 a | 63.1 bc | 22.1 d | 6.9 a | |||||||||||||||||||
温州 Wenzhou | 1444 c | 0.56 a | 187 e | 230 b | 71.4 a | 22.6 d | 4.3 cd | ||||||||||||||||||||
ANOVA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
品种类型 Type(T) | 28.36*** | 38.57*** | 28.59*** | 296.72*** | 29.20*** | 113.95*** | 37.38*** | ||||||||||||||||||||
纬度 Latitude(L) | 448.72*** | 788.59*** | 63.21*** | 350.11*** | 18.24** | 0.16 | 230.86** | ||||||||||||||||||||
T×L | 5.03** | 32.81*** | 3.42** | 10.53*** | 12.40*** | 17.12*** | 5.87** | ||||||||||||||||||||
2019 | IR | 富阳Fuyang | 黄华占Huanghuazhan | 1906±176 | 0.32±0.01 | 312±6 | 139±5 | 91.6±0.3 | 22.4±0.3 | 4.3±0.1 | |||||||||||||||||
天优华占Tianyouhuazhan | 1828±216 | 0.44±0.03 | 311±12 | 134±10 | 93.7±3.0 | 23.9±0.8 | 4.2±0.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
温州Wenzhou | 黄华占Huanghuazhan | 1434±157 | 0.43±0.03 | 278±23 | 148±7 | 92.6±0.3 | 20.6±0.1 | 4.1±0.3 | |||||||||||||||||||
天优华占Tianyouhuazhan | 1340±175 | 0.49±0.04 | 238±9 | 196±11 | 80.1±3.2 | 21.9±0.1 | 4.6±0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
IJR | 富阳Fuyang | 嘉58 Jia 58 | 1839±124 | 0.41±0.03 | 330±22 | 123±8 | 93.8±1.7 | 22.7±0.4 | 4.1±0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
南粳46 Nanjing 46 | 1561±119 | 0.46±0.02 | 370±18 | 91±1 | 93.9±0.8 | 25.7±0.6 | 3.4±0.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
宁粳4号Ningjing 4 | 1307±148 | 0.56±0.03 | 299±23 | 155±3 | 82.8±2.2 | 23.5±0.8 | 4.6±0.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
秀水134 Xiushui 134 | 1512±84 | 0.46±0.03 | 320±13 | 105±6 | 97.3±0.7 | 23.4±0 | 3.4±0.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
温州Wenzhou | 嘉58 Jia 58 | 1239±162 | 0.51±0.04 | 258±9 | 115±8 | 91.5±0 | 24.8±0.3 | 3.0±0.1 | |||||||||||||||||||
南粳46 Nanjing 46 | 1175±223 | 0.49±0.08 | 254±20 | 109±11 | 91.4±3.1 | 25.8±0.5 | 2.8±0.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
宁粳4号Ningjing 4 | 1020±68 | 0.59±0.09 | 240±4 | 131±3 | 84.5±0.3 | 23.5±0.4 | 3.2±0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
秀水134 Xiushui 134 | 1335±334 | 0.45±0.10 | 236±12 | 139±15 | 92.3±1.9 | 24.3±0.2 | 3.3±0.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
IJHR | 富阳Fuyang | 甬优1540 Yongyou 1540 | 1935±242 | 0.46±0.03 | 253±11 | 205±15 | 90.5±2.9 | 20.5±0.9 | 5.2±0.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
甬优538 Yongyou 538 | 1743±78 | 0.50±0.04 | 232±3 | 222±3 | 93.8±4.1 | 19.6±0.3 | 5.1±0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
甬优540 Yongyou 540 | 1869±41 | 0.45±0.01 | 243±8 | 228±5 | 90.4±2.1 | 19.1±0.9 | 5.5±0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
温州Wenzhou | 甬优1540 Yongyou 1540 | 1450±342 | 0.49±0.08 | 189±8 | 292±26 | 91.5±2.3 | 21.4±0.1 | 5.5±0.7 | |||||||||||||||||||
甬优538 Yongyou 538 | 1373±134 | 0.54±0.03 | 205±11 | 241±52 | 85.0±2.6 | 20.9±0.1 | 4.9±0.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||
甬优540 Yongyou 540 | 1491±227 | 0.46±0.03 | 185±5 | 249±9 | 87.1±0 | 20.8±0.4 | 4.6±0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
均值 | IR | 富阳 Fuyang | 1867 a | 0.38 b | 311 a | 136 d | 92.7 a | 23.2 b | 4.2 bc | ||||||||||||||||||
Average | 温州 Wenzhou | 1387 bc | 0.46 a | 258 b | 172 c | 86.4 b | 21.3 c | 4.4 b | |||||||||||||||||||
IJR | 富阳 Fuyang | 1555 b | 0.47 a | 330 a | 119 d | 91.9 a | 23.8 ab | 3.9 c | |||||||||||||||||||
温州 Wenzhou | 1192 c | 0.51 a | 247 b | 124 d | 89.9 ab | 24.6 a | 3.0 d | ||||||||||||||||||||
IJHR | 富阳 Fuyang | 1849 a | 0.47 a | 243 b | 218 b | 91.5 a | 19.7 d | 5.3 a | |||||||||||||||||||
温州 Wenzhou | 1438 b | 0.50 a | 193 c | 260 a | 87.9 ab | 21.0 c | 5.0 a | ||||||||||||||||||||
ANOVA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
品种类型 Type(T) | 5.17** | 9.06*** | 44.64*** | 76.55*** | 15.33*** | 93.88*** | 32.06*** | ||||||||||||||||||||
纬度 Latitude(L) | 62.63*** | 11.78** | 311.87*** | 31.50*** | 36.28*** | 7.38* | 16.40** | ||||||||||||||||||||
T×L | 0.66 | 1.32 | 5.83*** | 6.75*** | 8.26*** | 12.96*** | 4.92** |
年份 Year | 类型 Type | 纬度 Latitude | 营养生长期 Veg | 穗发育期 Rep | 灌浆期 GF | 全生育期 GP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | IR | 富阳Fuyang | 59 ab | 24 ab | 42 b | 125 b |
温州Wenzhou | 60 a | 25 a | 37 c | 121 c | ||
IJR | 富阳Fuyang | 57 bc | 22 bc | 62 a | 140 a | |
温州Wenzhou | 58 bc | 16 d | 36 c | 110 e | ||
IJHR | 富阳Fuyang | 58 bc | 22 abc | 60 a | 140 a | |
温州Wenzhou | 56 c | 21 c | 39 bc | 116 d | ||
ANOVA | ||||||
品种类型Type (T) | 7.94** | 18.06*** | 40.93*** | 9.23** | ||
纬度Latitude (L) | 0.09 | 8.07** | 319.69*** | 785.12*** | ||
T×L | 2.80 | 6.25** | 34.33*** | 9.23** | ||
2019 | IR | 富阳Fuyang | 60 b | 25 a | 41 c | 126 b |
温州Wenzhou | 62 a | 19 b | 38 d | 118 c | ||
IJR | 富阳Fuyang | 58 bc | 20 b | 48 b | 126 b | |
温州Wenzhou | 58 c | 19 b | 38 d | 114 c | ||
IJHR | 富阳Fuyang | 56 d | 26 a | 52 a | 134 a | |
温州Wenzhou | 58 c | 21 b | 40 bd | 119 c | ||
ANOVA | ||||||
品种类型Type (T) | 20.66*** | 14.41*** | 27.95*** | 6.23** | ||
纬度Latitude (L) | 5.64* | 32.08*** | 157.32*** | 49.09*** | ||
T×L | 4.63* | 4.78* | 12.95*** | 1.41 |
表3 浙江富阳和温州不同类型晚稻生育期差异
Table 3 Differences in growth period of different types of late rice in Fuyang and Wenzhou, Zhejiang in 2018 and 2019. d
年份 Year | 类型 Type | 纬度 Latitude | 营养生长期 Veg | 穗发育期 Rep | 灌浆期 GF | 全生育期 GP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | IR | 富阳Fuyang | 59 ab | 24 ab | 42 b | 125 b |
温州Wenzhou | 60 a | 25 a | 37 c | 121 c | ||
IJR | 富阳Fuyang | 57 bc | 22 bc | 62 a | 140 a | |
温州Wenzhou | 58 bc | 16 d | 36 c | 110 e | ||
IJHR | 富阳Fuyang | 58 bc | 22 abc | 60 a | 140 a | |
温州Wenzhou | 56 c | 21 c | 39 bc | 116 d | ||
ANOVA | ||||||
品种类型Type (T) | 7.94** | 18.06*** | 40.93*** | 9.23** | ||
纬度Latitude (L) | 0.09 | 8.07** | 319.69*** | 785.12*** | ||
T×L | 2.80 | 6.25** | 34.33*** | 9.23** | ||
2019 | IR | 富阳Fuyang | 60 b | 25 a | 41 c | 126 b |
温州Wenzhou | 62 a | 19 b | 38 d | 118 c | ||
IJR | 富阳Fuyang | 58 bc | 20 b | 48 b | 126 b | |
温州Wenzhou | 58 c | 19 b | 38 d | 114 c | ||
IJHR | 富阳Fuyang | 56 d | 26 a | 52 a | 134 a | |
温州Wenzhou | 58 c | 21 b | 40 bd | 119 c | ||
ANOVA | ||||||
品种类型Type (T) | 20.66*** | 14.41*** | 27.95*** | 6.23** | ||
纬度Latitude (L) | 5.64* | 32.08*** | 157.32*** | 49.09*** | ||
T×L | 4.63* | 4.78* | 12.95*** | 1.41 |
图3 2018–2019年浙江富阳和温州不同类型晚稻不同生育阶段温光资源配置差异Veg—营养生长期;Rep—穗发育期;GF—灌浆期;PI—幼穗分化期;HD—齐穗期。
Fig. 3. Differences in the allocation of temperature and light resources among different growth stages of different types of late rice from 2018 to 2019 in Fuyang and Wenzhou, Zhejiang.Veg, Vegetative stage; Rep, Reproductive stage; GF, Grain filling stage; PI, Panicle initiation; HD, Full heading stage.
主成分 Principle component | PC1 | PC5 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
特征值SS loadings | 6.54 | 3.81 | 3.76 | 2.86 | 1.54 |
贡献率Proportion of variance | 0.31 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.14 | 0.07 |
累积贡献率Cumulative of variance | 0.31 | 0.49 | 0.67 | 0.81 | 0.88 |
表4 2018–2019年富阳和温州晚稻主要农艺性状及温光资源贡献率
Table 4 Contribution rate of main agronomic traits and temperature and light resources of late rice in Fuyang and Wenzhou, Zhejiang from 2018 to 2019.
主成分 Principle component | PC1 | PC5 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
特征值SS loadings | 6.54 | 3.81 | 3.76 | 2.86 | 1.54 |
贡献率Proportion of variance | 0.31 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.14 | 0.07 |
累积贡献率Cumulative of variance | 0.31 | 0.49 | 0.67 | 0.81 | 0.88 |
参数 Parameter | PC1 | PC5 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
产量Yield | 0.11 | 0.44 | 0.71 | 0.18 | 0.11 |
干物质量Biomass | 0.65 | -0.01 | 0.32 | 0.23 | 0.26 |
收获指数Harvest index | -0.75 | 0.43 | 0.26 | -0.13 | -0.23 |
有效穗数Productive panicle number | 0.52 | -0.10 | 0.10 | -0.80 | 0.17 |
每穗粒数Spikelet number per panicle | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.93 | -0.23 |
结实率Seed setting rate | -0.09 | 0.00 | 0.11 | -0.18 | 0.95 |
千粒重1000-grain weight | 0.13 | 0.10 | -0.15 | -0.80 | -0.31 |
库容Sink | 0.47 | -0.02 | 0.09 | 0.69 | -0.22 |
营养生长期Vegetative stage | 0.06 | -1.00 | -0.11 | 0.08 | 0.00 |
穗发育期Reproductive stage | 0.18 | -0.13 | 0.85 | 0.03 | 0.06 |
灌浆期Grain filling stage | 0.90 | 0.39 | 0.08 | -0.10 | -0.02 |
全生育期Growth period | 0.86 | 0.08 | 0.34 | -0.06 | 0.00 |
营养生长期平均温度Veg-T | 0.87 | 0.11 | 0.07 | -0.12 | -0.32 |
穗发育期平均温度Rep-T | 0.43 | 0.45 | -0.56 | 0.11 | -0.04 |
灌浆期平均温度GF-T | -0.67 | 0.01 | -0.53 | 0.14 | 0.23 |
营养生长期有效积温Veg-AET | 0.65 | -0.68 | -0.02 | -0.02 | -0.23 |
穗发育期有效积温Rep-AET | 0.28 | -0.04 | 0.79 | 0.07 | 0.04 |
灌浆期有效积温GF-AET | 0.64 | 0.61 | -0.35 | -0.03 | 0.23 |
全生育期有效积温GP-AET | 0.90 | 0.01 | 0.21 | 0.01 | 0.05 |
幼穗分化期日照时数PI-SH | 0.10 | 0.89 | 0.01 | 0.11 | -0.12 |
齐穗期日照时数HD-SH | -0.21 | 0.54 | -0.62 | 0.01 | -0.05 |
表5 2018–2019年浙江富阳和温州主成分因子载荷表
Table 5 Principal component factors distribution of Fuyang and Wenzhou, Zhejiang from 2018 to 2019.
参数 Parameter | PC1 | PC5 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
产量Yield | 0.11 | 0.44 | 0.71 | 0.18 | 0.11 |
干物质量Biomass | 0.65 | -0.01 | 0.32 | 0.23 | 0.26 |
收获指数Harvest index | -0.75 | 0.43 | 0.26 | -0.13 | -0.23 |
有效穗数Productive panicle number | 0.52 | -0.10 | 0.10 | -0.80 | 0.17 |
每穗粒数Spikelet number per panicle | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.93 | -0.23 |
结实率Seed setting rate | -0.09 | 0.00 | 0.11 | -0.18 | 0.95 |
千粒重1000-grain weight | 0.13 | 0.10 | -0.15 | -0.80 | -0.31 |
库容Sink | 0.47 | -0.02 | 0.09 | 0.69 | -0.22 |
营养生长期Vegetative stage | 0.06 | -1.00 | -0.11 | 0.08 | 0.00 |
穗发育期Reproductive stage | 0.18 | -0.13 | 0.85 | 0.03 | 0.06 |
灌浆期Grain filling stage | 0.90 | 0.39 | 0.08 | -0.10 | -0.02 |
全生育期Growth period | 0.86 | 0.08 | 0.34 | -0.06 | 0.00 |
营养生长期平均温度Veg-T | 0.87 | 0.11 | 0.07 | -0.12 | -0.32 |
穗发育期平均温度Rep-T | 0.43 | 0.45 | -0.56 | 0.11 | -0.04 |
灌浆期平均温度GF-T | -0.67 | 0.01 | -0.53 | 0.14 | 0.23 |
营养生长期有效积温Veg-AET | 0.65 | -0.68 | -0.02 | -0.02 | -0.23 |
穗发育期有效积温Rep-AET | 0.28 | -0.04 | 0.79 | 0.07 | 0.04 |
灌浆期有效积温GF-AET | 0.64 | 0.61 | -0.35 | -0.03 | 0.23 |
全生育期有效积温GP-AET | 0.90 | 0.01 | 0.21 | 0.01 | 0.05 |
幼穗分化期日照时数PI-SH | 0.10 | 0.89 | 0.01 | 0.11 | -0.12 |
齐穗期日照时数HD-SH | -0.21 | 0.54 | -0.62 | 0.01 | -0.05 |
图4 2018–2019年浙江富阳和温州不同类型晚稻主成分1与主成分2、主成分3以及主成分5因子载荷图
Fig. 4. Distribution of principal component 1 and principal component 2, component 3 and component 5 of different types of late rice in Fuyang and Wenzhou, Zhejiang from 2018 to 2019.
参数 Parameter | 所有品种 All cultivars | IR | IJR | IJHR |
---|---|---|---|---|
有效穗数Productive panicle number | 0.48*** | 0.30 | 0.49* | 0.47* |
每穗粒数Spikelet per panicle | -0.45*** | -0.31 | -0.04 | -0.87*** |
结实率Seed setting rate | 0.07 | 0.34 | -0.57** | 0.71*** |
收获指数Harvest index | 0.76*** | 0.92*** | 0.71*** | 0.78*** |
库容Sink | -0.25 | -0.31 | 0.16 | -0.73*** |
营养生长期Vegetative stage | -0.17 | -0.25 | 0.20 | -0.70** |
穗发育期Reproductive stage | 0.44*** | 0.63* | -0.09 | 0.81*** |
灌浆期Grain filling stage | -0.10 | -0.96*** | -0.04 | -0.92*** |
全生育期Growth period | 0.01 | 0.08 | -0.02 | -0.94*** |
营养生长期平均温度Veg-T | -0.45*** | -0.25 | -0.23 | -0.94*** |
穗发育期平均温度Rep-T | -0.29* | -0.15 | -0.06 | -0.93*** |
灌浆期平均温度GF-T | -0.38** | -0.46 | -0.12 | -0.63** |
营养生长期有效积温Veg-AET | -0.37** | -0.25 | -0.01 | -0.81*** |
穗发育期有效积温Rep-AET | 0.30* | 0.78** | -0.09 | 0.59** |
灌浆期有效积温GF-AET | -0.32* | -0.75** | -0.09 | -0.87*** |
全生育期有效积温GP-AET | -0.21 | -0.31 | -0.09 | -0.94*** |
表6 不同类型品种纬度间产量差异与主要农艺性状及温光资源差异之间的相关性
Table 6 Correlation between yield and main agronomic traits and between yield and temperature and light resources at two latitudes for different rice types.
参数 Parameter | 所有品种 All cultivars | IR | IJR | IJHR |
---|---|---|---|---|
有效穗数Productive panicle number | 0.48*** | 0.30 | 0.49* | 0.47* |
每穗粒数Spikelet per panicle | -0.45*** | -0.31 | -0.04 | -0.87*** |
结实率Seed setting rate | 0.07 | 0.34 | -0.57** | 0.71*** |
收获指数Harvest index | 0.76*** | 0.92*** | 0.71*** | 0.78*** |
库容Sink | -0.25 | -0.31 | 0.16 | -0.73*** |
营养生长期Vegetative stage | -0.17 | -0.25 | 0.20 | -0.70** |
穗发育期Reproductive stage | 0.44*** | 0.63* | -0.09 | 0.81*** |
灌浆期Grain filling stage | -0.10 | -0.96*** | -0.04 | -0.92*** |
全生育期Growth period | 0.01 | 0.08 | -0.02 | -0.94*** |
营养生长期平均温度Veg-T | -0.45*** | -0.25 | -0.23 | -0.94*** |
穗发育期平均温度Rep-T | -0.29* | -0.15 | -0.06 | -0.93*** |
灌浆期平均温度GF-T | -0.38** | -0.46 | -0.12 | -0.63** |
营养生长期有效积温Veg-AET | -0.37** | -0.25 | -0.01 | -0.81*** |
穗发育期有效积温Rep-AET | 0.30* | 0.78** | -0.09 | 0.59** |
灌浆期有效积温GF-AET | -0.32* | -0.75** | -0.09 | -0.87*** |
全生育期有效积温GP-AET | -0.21 | -0.31 | -0.09 | -0.94*** |
[1] | 李晨. “北粳南移”困境被破解[J]. 粮食科技与经济, 2019, 44(9): 11. |
Li C. The dilemma of “japonica moving from north to south” has been solved[J]. Grain Science and Technology and Economy, 2019, 44(9): 11. (in Chinese) | |
[2] | 陈温福, 潘文博, 徐正进. 我国粳稻生产现状及发展趋势[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2006(6): 801-805. |
Chen W F, Pan W B, Xu Z J. Current situation and trends in production of japonica rice in China[J]. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 2006(6): 801-805. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 王晓凌. 中国东北粳稻供需及产业经营状况研究[D].北京: 中国农业科学院, 2012. |
Wang X L. Research on demand and supply, and production operation of Japonica rice in northeast China[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2012. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 梁玉刚, 周晶, 杨琴, 黄璜. 中国南方多熟种植的发展现状、功能及前景分析[J].作物研究, 2016, 30(5): 572-578. |
Liang Y G, Zhou J, Yang Q, Huang H. Development status, function and prospect analysis of the multiple cropping in southern China[J]. Crop Research, 2016, 30(5): 572-578. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 陈风波, 马志雄, 陈培勇. 农户水稻种植模式选择现状及其影响因素分析——对长江中下游地区四个省的调查[J]. 农业经济与管理, 2011(3): 62-73. |
Chen F B, Ma Z X, Chen P Y. Analysis on the present situation and influencing factors of farmers’ rice planting mode selection[J]. Agricultural Economics and Management, 2011(3): 62-73. (in Chinese) | |
[6] | 段里成, 庞博, 商庆银, 石庆华, 潘晓华, 吴自明. 双季稻“早籼晚粳”栽培模式周年产量构成与经济效益分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2016, 44(9): 82-85. |
Duan L C, Pang B, Shang Q Y, Shi Q H, Pan X H, Wu Z M. Analysis on annual yield composition and economic benefit of double cropping rice “early indica and late Japonica” cultivation mode[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 44(9): 82-85. (in Chinese) | |
[7] | 罗海淑. 南方稻区籼改粳的可行性[J]. 江西农业, 2020(2): 80. |
Luo H S. Feasibility of “replace indica rice with japonica rice” in southern China[J]. Jiangxi Agriculture, 2020(2): 80. (in Chinese) | |
[8] | 周活良, 黎二妹, 车新民, 谢忠平, 车慧燕. 双季晚粳高产栽培试验示范技术[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2013(4): 206-207. |
Zhou H L, Li E M, Che X M, Xie Z P, Che H Y. Experimental demonstration technique for high yield cultivation of double-season late japonica[J]. Bulletin of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2013(4): 206-207. (in Chinese) | |
[9] | 花劲, 周年兵, 张军, 张洪程, 霍中洋, 周培建, 程飞虎, 李国业, 黄大山, 陈忠平, 陈国梁, 戴其根, 许轲, 魏海燕, 高辉, 郭保卫. 双季稻区晚稻“籼改粳”品种筛选[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(23): 4582-4594. |
Hua J, Zhou N B, Zhang J, Zhang H C, Huo Z Y, Zhou P J, Cheng F H, Li G Y, Huang D S, Chen Z P, Chen G L, Dai Q G, Xu K, Wei H Y, Gao H, Guo B W. Selection of late rice cultivars of japonica rice switched from indica rice in double cropping rice area[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(23): 4582-4594. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 郭保卫, 花劲, 周年兵, 张洪程, 陈波, 舒鹏, 霍中洋, 周培建, 程飞虎, 黄大山, 陈忠平, 陈国梁, 陈恒,戴其根, 许轲, 魏海燕, 高辉. 双季晚稻不同类型品种产量及其群体动态特征差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(8): 1220-1236. |
Guo B W, Hua J, Zhou N B, Zhang H C, Chen B, Shu P, Huo Z Y, Zhou P J, Cheng F H, Huang D S, Chen Z P, Chen G L, Chen H, Dai Q G, Xu K, Wei H Y, Gao H. Difference in yield and population characteristics of different types of late rice cultivars in double-cropping rice area[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2015, 41(8): 1220-1236. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 殷敏, 刘少文, 褚光, 徐春梅, 王丹英, 章秀福, 陈松. 长江下游稻区不同类型双季晚粳稻产量与生育特性差异[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(5): 890-903. |
Yin M, Liu S W, Chu G, Xu C M, Wang D Y, Zhang X F, Chen S. Differences in yield and growth traits of different japonica varieties in the double cropping late season in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(5): 890-903. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 黄山, 何虎, 张卫星, 王志刚, 章秀福, 廖西元, 潘晓华. 不同粳稻品种在江西不同生态区的农学表现[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2013, 35(1): 25-32. |
Huang S, He H, Zhang W X, Wang Z G, Zhang X F, Liao X Y, Pan X H. Agronomic performance of different japonica rice varieties in different eco-regions in Jiangxi province[J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2013, 35(1): 25-32. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 董啸波, 霍中洋, 张洪程, 李国业, 曹开蔚, 程飞虎, 黄大山, 戴其根, 许轲, 魏海燕. 南方双季晚稻籼改粳优势及技术关键[J]. 中国稻米, 2012, 18(1): 25-28. |
Dong X B, Huo Z Y, Zhang H C, Li G Y, Cao K W, Cheng F H, Huang D S, Dai Q G, Xu K, Wei H Y. Advantages and key technology of “indica rice to japonica rice” of double-cropping late rice in southern China[J]. China Rice, 2012, 18(1): 25-28. (in Chinese) | |
[14] | 陈波, 周年兵, 郭保卫, 舒鹏, 张洪程, 霍中洋, 程飞虎, 花劲, 黄大山, 陈忠平, 陈恒, 刘云发, 廖世亮. 江西双季晚稻不同纬度产量、生育期及温光资源利用的差异[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(8): 1403-1415. |
Chen B, Zhou N B, Guo B W, Shu P, Zhang H C, Huo Z Y, Cheng F H, Hua J, Huang D S, Chen Z P, Chen H, Liu Y F, Liao S L. Differences of double-cropping late rice in yield, growth stage and utilization of temperature and illumination in different latitudes of Jiangxi province[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(8): 1403-1415. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 陈波. 江西双季晚稻不同类型品种综合生产力及其形成特征[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2017. |
Chen B. Studies on comprehensive productivity of different types of double-cropping late rice and characteristics analysis in Jiangxi Province[D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2017. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | Ball R A, Purcell L C, Carey S K. Evaluation of solar radiation prediction models in North America[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2004, 96(2): 391-397. |
[17] | 姚义, 霍中洋, 张洪程, 夏炎, 倪晓诚, 戴其根, 许轲, 魏海燕. 不同生态区播期对直播稻生育期及温光利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(4): 633-647. |
Yao Y, Huo Z Y, Zhang H C, Xia Y, Ni X C, Dai Q G, Xu K, Wei H Y. Effects of sowing date on growth stage and utilization of temperature and illumination of direct seeding rice in different ecological regions[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(4): 633-647. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 李杰, 张洪程, 董洋阳, 倪晓诚, 杨波, 龚金龙, 常勇, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕. 不同生态区栽培方式对水稻产量、生育期及温光利用的影响[J].中国农业科学, 2011, 44(13): 2661-2672. |
Effects of Cultivation Methods on Yield, Growth Stage and utilization of temperature and illumination of rice indifferent ecological regions[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(13): 2661-2672. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 张斯梅, 顾克军, 顾东祥, 张传辉, 许博, 张恒敢, 于建光, 杨四军. 江苏淮北地区粳稻产量与干物质生产特征研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(9): 1-7. |
Zhang S M, Gu K J, Gu D X, Zhang C H, Xu B, Zhang H G, Yu J G, Yang S J. Yield and dry matter production characteristics of japonica rice in Huaibei of Jiangsu[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(9): 1-7. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 陈青春, 蓝盾, 赵新飞, 张大伟, 张永顺, 付丽娇, 李明, 李艳大. 不同生育期水稻干物质量与产量的关系研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2017, 56(7): 1221-1227. |
Chen Q C, Lan D, Zhao X F, Zhang D W, Zhang Y S, Fu L J, Li M, Li Y D. Study on the relationship between dry weight and yield of rice at different growth stages[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 56(7): 1221-1227. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 敖和军, 王淑红, 邹应斌, 彭少兵, 唐启源, 方远祥, 肖安民, 陈玉梅, 熊昌明. 超级杂交稻干物质生产特点与产量稳定性研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(7): 1927-1936. |
Ao H J, Wang S H, Zou Y B, Peng S B, Tang Q Y, Fang Y X, Xiao A M, Chen Y M, Xiong C M. Study on yield stability and dry matter characteristics of super hybrid Rice[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2008, 41(7): 1927-1936. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 宋昕蔚, 林建荣, 吴明国. 水稻籼粳亚种间杂种优势利用研究进展与展望[J]. 科学通报, 2016, 61(35): 3778-3786. |
Song X W, Lin J R, Wu M G. Research progress and prospect of hybrid rice utilization of heterosis between indica and japonica subspecies[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2016, 61(35): 3778-3786. (in Chinese) | |
[23] | 张洪程, 张军, 龚金龙, 常勇, 李敏, 高辉, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕. “籼改粳”的生产优势及其形成机理[J]. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(4): 686-704. |
Zhang H C, Zhang J, Gong J L, Chang Y, Li M, Gao H, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y. The productive advantages and formation mechanisms of “indica rice to japonica rice”[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(4): 686-704. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 冯达权, 彭国照. 地理变差及气候相似距与早、中稻引种适应性的研究[J]. 应用气象学报, 1992(3): 371-375. |
Feng D Q, Peng G Z. Study on the relation of geographic conditions variation and deviation of climatic analogue with the adaptability of rice varieties introduced[J]. Quarterly Journal of Applied Meteorology, 1992(3): 371-375. (in Chinese) | |
[25] | 龚金龙, 邢志鹏, 胡雅杰, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 高辉. 江淮下游地区籼粳超级稻生育期与温光资源利用特征的差异研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2014, 28(3): 267-276. |
Gong J L, Xing Z P, Hu Y J, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Gao H. Difference in growth duration and utilization of temperature and solar radiation between indica and japonica super rice in the lower Yangtze and Huaihe River Valley[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2014, 28(3): 267-276. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | 孙建军, 张洪程, 尹海庆, 陈波, 郭保卫, 魏海燕, 戴其根, 王生轩, 陈献功, 姜元华, 姜明波, 杜元中, 夏彦. 不同生态区播期对机插水稻产量、生育期及温光利用的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(6): 113-121. |
Sun J J, Zhang H C, Yin H Q, Chen B, Guo B W, Wei H Y, Dai Q G, Wang S X, Chen X G, Jiang Y H, Jiang M B, Du Y Z, Xia Y. Effects of seeding date on yield, growth period and utilization of temperature and sunshine of mechanical transplanting rice in different ecological regions[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31(6): 113-121. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | 中稻宣. 2015年全国及各省(市、区)粮食及水稻播种面积和产量[J]. 中国稻米, 2017, 23(6): 110. |
Zhong Daoxuan. National and provincial(city, district) grain and rice planting area and production in 2015[J]. China Rice, 2017, 23(6): 110. (in Chinese) | |
[28] | 陈波, 周年兵, 郭保卫, 黄大山, 陈忠平, 花劲, 霍中洋, 张洪程. 南方稻区“籼改粳”研究进展[J]. 扬州大学学报: 农业与生命科学版, 2017, 38(1): 67-72,88. |
Chen B, Zhou N B, Guo B W, Huang D S, Chen Z P, Hua J, Huo Z Y, Zhang H C. Progress of “indica rice to japonica rice” in southern China[J]. Journal of Yangzhou University: Agricultural and Life Science Edition, 2017, 38(1): 67-72, 88. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[29] | 王学林, 曾凯, 柳军, 谢金花, 张玉龙, 邓斌. 长江中下游地区双季稻生长季内热量资源的变化特征及温度适宜度分析[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报: 自然科学版, 2021(3): 27-37. |
Wang X L, Zeng K, Liu J, Xie J H, Zhang Y L, Deng B. Variation characteristics of heat resource and temperature suitability for double cropping rice growing seasons in the middle and lower reaches of Yangtze River[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University: Natural Science Edition, 2021(3): 27-37. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[30] | 唐健, 唐闯, 郭保卫, 张诚信, 卫平洋, 张洪程, 陈恒, 李雄, 廖赟华, 李秋保, 余进, 孙明珠, 邵彩虹. 江西不同生态区优质双季晚稻产量、品质及温光资源利用差异[J]. 扬州大学学报: 农业与生命科学版, 2019, 40(6): 8-15. |
Tang J, Tang C, Guo B W, Zhang C X, Wei P Y, Zhang H C, Chen H, Li X, Liao Y H, Li Q B, Yu J, Sun M Z, Shao C H. Differences in yield, quality and utilization of temperature and illumination of high quality double-season late rice cultivars in different ecological regions of Jiangxi Province[J]. Journal of Yangzhou University: Agricultural and Life Science Edition, 2019, 40(6): 8-15. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[31] | 方杰, 谭旭生, 李智谋, 姚仁祥, 管恩相, 管锋. 湖南洞庭湖区发展“早籼晚粳”的优势分析及关键技术[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2015(11): 166-168. |
Fang J, Tan X S, Li Z M, Yao R X, Guan E X, Guan F. Advantage analysis and key techniques of developing early indica and late japonica in Dongting Lake district of Hunan Province[J]. Bulletin of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2015(11): 166-168. (in Chinese) | |
[32] | 邢志鹏, 胡雅杰, 张洪程, 龚金龙, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 张强, 王文婷, 李德剑, 刘国林, 刘国涛, 朱佳炜. 迟播迟栽对不同类型粳稻品种机插产量及生育期的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2014, 20(3): 11-16. |
Xing Z P, Hu Y J, Zhang H C, Gong J L, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Zhang Q, Wang W T, Li D J, Liu G L, Liu G T, Zhu J W. Effect of late sowing and late transplanting on yield and period of duration of different types of mechanical transplanting rice[J]. China Rice, 2014, 20(3): 11-16. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 郭展, 张运波. 水稻对干旱胁迫的生理生化响应及分子调控研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 335-349. |
[2] | 韦还和, 马唯一, 左博源, 汪璐璐, 朱旺, 耿孝宇, 张翔, 孟天瑶, 陈英龙, 高平磊, 许轲, 霍中洋, 戴其根. 盐、干旱及其复合胁迫对水稻产量和品质形成影响的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 350-363. |
[3] | 吕宙, 易秉怀, 陈平平, 周文新, 唐文帮, 易镇邪. 施氮量与移栽密度对小粒型杂交水稻产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 422-436. |
[4] | 赵艺婷, 谢可冉, 高逖, 崔克辉. 水稻分蘖期干旱锻炼对幼穗分化期高温下穗发育和产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 277-289. |
[5] | 周甜, 吴少华, 康建宏, 吴宏亮, 杨生龙, 王星强, 李昱, 黄玉峰. 不同种植模式对水稻籽粒淀粉含量及淀粉关键酶活性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 303-315. |
[6] | 彭显龙, 董强, 张辰, 李鹏飞, 李博琳, 刘智蕾, 于彩莲. 不同土壤条件下秸秆还田量对土壤还原性物质及水稻生长的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(2): 198-210. |
[7] | 朱旺, 张翔, 耿孝宇, 张哲, 陈英龙, 韦还和, 戴其根, 许轲, 朱广龙, 周桂生, 孟天瑶. 盐-旱复合胁迫下水稻根系的形态和生理特征及其与产量形成的关系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(6): 617-627. |
[8] | 邹宇傲, 吴启侠, 周乾顺, 朱建强, 晏军. 孕穗期杂交中稻对淹涝胁迫的响应[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(6): 642-656. |
[9] | 袁沛, 周旋, 杨威, 尹凌洁, 靳拓, 彭建伟, 荣湘民, 田昌. 化肥减氮配施对洞庭湖区双季稻产量和田面水氮磷流失风险的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(5): 518-528. |
[10] | 肖大康, 胡仁, 韩天富, 张卫峰, 侯俊, 任科宇. 氮肥用量和运筹对我国水稻产量及其构成因子影响的整合分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(5): 529-542. |
[11] | 黄亚茹, 徐鹏, 王乐乐, 贺一哲, 王辉, 柯健, 何海兵, 武立权, 尤翠翠. 外源海藻糖对粳稻品系W1844籽粒灌浆特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 379-391. |
[12] | 高欠清, 任孝俭, 翟中兵, 郑普兵, 吴源芬, 崔克辉. 头季穗肥和促芽肥对再生稻再生芽生长及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 405-414. |
[13] | 王文婷, 马佳颖, 李光彦, 符卫蒙, 李沪波, 林洁, 陈婷婷, 奉保华, 陶龙兴, 符冠富, 秦叶波. 高温下不同施肥量对水稻产量品质形成的影响及其与能量代谢的关系分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 253-264. |
[14] | 杨晓龙, 王彪, 汪本福, 张枝盛, 张作林, 杨蓝天, 程建平, 李阳. 不同水分管理方式对旱直播水稻产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 285-294. |
[15] | 魏晓东, 宋雪梅, 赵凌, 赵庆勇, 陈涛, 路凯, 朱镇, 黄胜东, 王才林, 张亚东. 硅锌肥及其施用方式对南粳46产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 295-306. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||