不同类型水稻品种产量和氮素吸收利用对大气CO2浓度升高响应的差异

doi:10.16819/j.1001-7216.2020.0404

中国水稻科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 561-573.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2020.0404

不同类型水稻品种产量和氮素吸收利用对大气CO₂浓度升高响应的差异

周娟¹, 舒小伟¹, 赖上坤^1,², 许高平^1,³, 黄建晔¹, 姚友礼¹, 杨连新¹, 董桂春¹, 王余龙^1,^*()

¹ 扬州大学江苏省作物遗传生理国家重点实验室培育点/农业部长江中下游作物生理生态与栽培重点开放实验室/粮食作物现代产业技术协同创新中心, 江苏扬州 225009
² 江苏省农业科学院宿迁农科所,江苏宿迁223800
³ 天津市农业科学院农作物研究所,天津 300112

收稿日期:2020-04-23 修回日期:2020-07-03 出版日期:2020-11-10 发布日期:2020-11-10
通讯作者: 王余龙
基金资助:
江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目;国家自然科学基金资助项目(31571608);江苏省农业自主创新项目[CX(18)1002];农业部农业重大技术协同推广计划点项目(2020-SJ-047-03);江苏省重点研究计划科技成果转化专项资金资助项目（BA2016173,202350040）;江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划资助项目

Differences in Response of Grain Yield, Nitrogen Absorption and Utilization to Elevated CO₂Concentration in Different Rice Varieties

Juan ZHOU¹, Xiaowei SHU¹, Shangkun LAI^1,², Gaoping XU^1,³, Jianye HUANG¹, Youli YAO¹, Lianxin Yang¹, Guichun DONG¹, Yulong WANG^1,^*()

¹ Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology of Jiangsu Province / Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology and Cultivation in Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River of Ministry of Agriculture/Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou225009,China
² Suqian Institute of Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Suqian 223800, China
³ Crop Research Institute, Tianjin Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Tianjin 300112, China

Received:2020-04-23 Revised:2020-07-03 Online:2020-11-10 Published:2020-11-10
Contact: Yulong WANG

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探明不同类型水稻品种产量和氮素吸收利用对FACE(大气CO₂浓度增高)响应的差异。方法以常规粳稻、杂交籼稻、常规籼稻共6个品种为供试材料,研究FACE对不同类型水稻产量、氮素吸收利用的影响。结果 1）FACE处理极显著提高了水稻产量,平均增加24.17%, 常规籼稻增幅最大,FACE和对照均以杂交籼稻最高;2）FACE处理显著增加了单位面积穗数,常规粳稻增幅最大,并显著增加了杂交籼稻和常规籼稻每穗粒数;3）FACE处理显著提高了成熟期吸氮量和氮素籽粒生产效率,成熟期吸氮量平均增加21.23%,杂交籼稻增幅最大, FACE和对照均以常规籼稻最高;氮素籽粒生产效率平均增加7.33%,杂交籼稻增幅最大,FACE和对照均以杂交籼稻最高。成熟期吸氮量对产量促进作用略大于成熟期氮素籽粒生产效率;4）FACE处理降低了植株含氮率,成熟期平均下降0.105个百分点,常规粳稻降幅最大。FACE处理极显著提高植株干物质量,成熟期平均增加23.95%,常规籼稻增幅最大;FACE处理显著提高常规籼稻和杂交籼稻成熟期单穗吸氮量,分别增加10.79%、13.93%,但常规粳稻下降了9.60%;FACE处理显著提高了成熟期群体吸氮强度,平均增加22.29%,杂交籼稻增幅最大。FACE处理对水稻全生育期天数无显著影响;FACE处理显著提高茎鞘、叶片、穗各器官吸氮量,叶片增幅最大,平均增加51.86%,杂交籼稻增幅最大;FACE处理显著提高了不同生育阶段吸氮量,抽穗-成熟阶段增幅最大,平均增加108.90%,杂交籼稻增幅最大;5）植株干物质量、单穗吸氮量、吸氮强度、穗吸氮量、抽穗-成熟阶段吸氮量对成熟期总吸氮量的促进作用分别大于植株含氮率、单位面积穗数、生育天数、茎鞘叶吸氮量、移栽-分蘖和分蘖-抽穗阶段吸氮量;6）FACE处理显著提高了氮肥偏生产力,降低了每百千克籽粒需氮量,前者平均增加24.16%,常规籼稻增加最多;后者平均降低4.7%,常规籼稻降幅最大。结论 FACE处理可显著提高水稻产量和氮素吸收利用效率,但品种间差异较大。

关键词: CO₂浓度增高, 水稻, 品种类型, 产量, 氮素吸收利用

Abstract:

【Objective】Our aim is to investigate the differences in response of grain yield, nitrogen absorption and utilization toFACE (atmospheric CO₂ concentration increase) of different rice varieties. 【Method】Six rice varieties, including conventional japonica rice, hybrid indica rice, and conventional indica rice, were used to study the effects of free-air CO₂enrichment (FACE) (atmospheric CO₂ concentration increase) on the nitrogen absorption, utilization, and yield of different types of rice.【Result】1) FACE treatment dramatically increased rice yield by 24.17% on average and the maximum increment was observed in conventional indica rice. Compared with other types of rice varieties, hybrid indica showed the highest grain yield under both FACE and control (CK) treatments. 2) Panicle number was significantly improved in FACE treatment with conventional japonica rice varieties having the maximum increment.Spikelet number per panicle was significantly improved in hybrid and conventional indica rice varieties in FACE treatment. 3) The nitrogen absorption(NA) and nitrogen use efficiency for grain yield (NUEg) were significantly higher in FACE treatment than those in CK treatment. The average increase of NA was 21.23% with the maximum increment in hybrid indica rice varieties. Compared with other rice varieties, conventional indica rice varieties had the highest NA both in FACE and CK treatments. The average increase of NUEg was 7.33% with hybridindica rice varieties enjoying the maximum increment. The hybrid indica rice varietieshad the highest NUEg in FACE treatment and in CK treatment, respectively.4) Nitrogen content was decreased in FACE treatment with the average decrease of 0.105%, amongwhichthe maximum decrease was observed in conventional japonica rice. Dry matter weight was extremely and significantly increased in FACE treatment. The average increase of dry weight was 23.95% with the maximum increment in conventional indica rice varieties. NA of single panicle was significantly improved in FACE treatment with the average increase of 10.79% in conventional indica rice varieties and 13.93% in hybrid indica rice varieties, but NA of single panicle was decrease by 9.60% in conventional japonica rice. FACE treatment significantly increased rice NA intensity with an average increase of22.29% and the maximum increment was observed inhybrid indica rice varieties. The growth duration was not influenced by FACE treatment in all rice varieties. NAs of stem, leaf and panicle were significantly higher in FACE treatment than in CK treatment with the highest increase of 51.86% in leaf. The largest increase of NA was observed in hybrid indica rice. NA in different rice growth stageswassignificantly improved with the maximum increment of 108.90% during heading-maturity. The maximum increment of NA from heading to maturity was observed in hybrid indica rice varieties. 5) Effects of dry matter weight, NA per panicle, NA intensity, NA of panicle and NA from heading to maturity on NA at maturity were greater thanthose of nitrogen content, panicle number, growth duration, NAA of leaf, stem andsheath, NAA during transplanting-tillering and tillering-heading. 6) Partial productivity of nitrogen fertilizer (PFP_N) was significantly improved in FACE treatment with an average increase of 24.16% and the maximum increment in conventional indica rice. NAA per 100 kg grains was significantly reduced in FACE treatment with an average decrease of 4.7%.The maximum decrease of NAA per 100 kg grains was observed in conventional indica rice varieties.【Conclusion】The results indicated that FACE could markedly increased both grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency in all rice varieties, but theincreases variedwith the variety types.

Key words: elevated CO₂ concentration, rice, variety type, grain yield, nitrogen absorption and utilization

中图分类号:

S181
S511.06

周娟, 舒小伟, 赖上坤, 许高平, 黄建晔, 姚友礼, 杨连新, 董桂春, 王余龙. 不同类型水稻品种产量和氮素吸收利用对大气CO₂浓度升高响应的差异[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(6): 561-573.

Juan ZHOU, Xiaowei SHU, Shangkun LAI, Gaoping XU, Jianye HUANG, Youli YAO, Lianxin Yang, Guichun DONG, Yulong WANG. Differences in Response of Grain Yield, Nitrogen Absorption and Utilization to Elevated CO₂Concentration in Different Rice Varieties[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2020, 34(6): 561-573.

图/表 10

参考文献 36

[1]	Stocker T F, Qin D, Plattner G K.IPCC:Climate change: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change[M].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013:1-1535.
[2]	Cracknell A P, Varotsos C A.The IPCC fourth assessment report and the fiftieth anniversary of Sputnik[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2007, 14(6): 384-387.
[3]	Ainsworth E A, Long S P.What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy[J]. New Phytologist, 2005, 165(2): 351-371.
[4]	Wei D, Cui K, Pan J, Ye G, Xiang J, Nie L, Huang J.Genetic dissection of grain nitrogen use efficiency and grain yield and their relationship in rice[J]. Field Crops Research, 2011, 124(3):340-346.
[5]	Roberts TL, Ross WJ, Norman RJ, Slaton NA, Jr. Wilson CE.Predicting nitrogen fertilizer needs for rice in arkansas using alkaline hydrolyzable-nitrogen[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2011, 75(3):1161-1171.
[6]	Liang XQ, Li H, Wang SX, Ye YS, Ji YJ, Tian GM, van Kessel C, Linquist BA. Nitrogen management to reduce yield-scaled global warming potential in rice[J]. Field Crops Research, 2013, 146:66-74.
[7]	Wang B, Guo C, Wan Y, Li J, Ju X, Cai W, You S, Qin X, Wilkes A, Li Y.Air warming and CO2 enrichment increase N use efficiency and decrease N surplus in a Chinese double rice cropping system[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 706(136063).
[8]	杨连新,王余龙,黄建晔,杨洪建,刘红江. 开放式空气CO2浓度增高对水稻生长发育影响的研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2006(7):1331-1337.
	Yang L X, Wang Y L, Huang J Y, YangH J, Liu H J. Responses of rice growth and development to free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE): A research review[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2006(7):1331-1337. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	杨连新, 王云霞, 朱建国. 十年水稻FACE的产量响应[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(3): 1486-1497.
	Yang L X, Wang Y X,Zhu J G.What have we learned from 10 years of free air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiments on riceCO2 and grain yield[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(3): 1486-1497. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	杨连新,王云霞,朱建国,Toshihiro H,王余龙.开放式空气中CO2浓度增高(FACE)对水稻生长和发育的影响[J].生态学报,2010,30(6):1573-1585.
	YangL X, Wang Y X, Zhu J G,Toshihiro H, Wang Y L. What have we learned from 10 years of free-air CO2enrichment(FACE)experiments on rice growth and development[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(6): 1573-1585. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	Noguchi K, Tsunoda T, Miyagi A, Kawai-Yamada M, Sugiura D, Miyazawa S, Tokida T, Usui Y, Nakamura H, Sakai H.Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on respiratory rates in mature leaves of two rice cultivars grown at a free-air CO2enrichment site and analyses of the underlying mechanisms[J]. Plant and Cell Physlology, 2018, 59(3): 637-649.
[12]	Cai C, Yin X, He S, Jiang W, Si C, Struik PC, Luo W, Li G, Xie Y, Xiong Y.Responses of wheat and rice to factorial combinations of ambient and elevated CO2 and temperature in FACE experiments[J]. Global Change Biology, 2016, 22(2): 856-874.
[13]	Cai C, Li G, Yang H, Yang J, Liu H, Struik PC, Luo W, Yin X, Di L, Guo X.Do all leaf photosynthesis parameters of rice acclimate to elevated CO2, elevated temperature, and their combination, in FACE environments[J]? Global Change Biology, 2018, 24(4):1685-1707.
[14]	Wang W, Cai C, He J, Gu J, Zhu G, Zhang W, Zhu J, Liu G.Yield, dry matter distribution and photosynthetic characteristics of rice under elevated CO2 and increased temperature conditions[J]. Field Crops Research, 2020, 248:107605.
[15]	Kim HY, Lieffering M, Miura S, Kobayashi K, Okada M.Growth and nitrogen uptake of CO2-enriched rice under field conditions[J]. New Phytologist, 2001, 150(2): 223-229.
[16]	谢祖彬, 朱建国, 张雅丽, 马红亮, 刘钢, 韩勇, 曾青, 蔡祖聪. 水稻生长及其体内C、N、P 组成对开放式空气 CO2浓度增高和N、P施肥的响应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2002, 13(10): 1223-1230.
	Xie Z B, Zhu J G, Zhang Y L, Liu G, Han Y, Zeng Q, Cai Z C.Responses of rice (Oryza sativa) growth and its C,N and P composition to FACE (Free-air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment) and N,P fertilization[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002, 13(10): 1223-1230.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	董桂春, 王余龙, 杨洪建,黄建晔, 朱建国, 杨连新, 单玉华. 开放式空气 CO2浓度增高对水稻N素吸收利用的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2002, 13(10): 1219-1222.
	Dong G C, Wang Y L, Yang H J, Huang J Y, Yang L X, Shan Y H.Effect of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) on nitrogen accumulation and utilization efficiency in rice (Oryza sativa)[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002,13(10): 1219-1222.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	黄建晔, 杨洪建, 杨连新,王余龙, 朱建国, 刘红江, 董桂春, 单玉华. 水稻不同生育时期N素营养对FACE响应的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2004, 30(12): 1237-1243.
	Huang J Y, Yang H J, Yang L X, Wang Y L, Zhu J G, Liu H J,Dong G C, Shan Y H.Effects of free-air CO2enrichment(FACE) on nitrogen nutrition at different growth stages in rice(Oryza sativa L.) cultivar Wuxiangjing 14[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2004,30(12): 1237-1243.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	庞静, 朱建国, 谢祖彬,刘刚, 陈改苹.CO2浓度升高条件下水稻蒸腾与N吸收的关系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2006, 20(2):205-209.
	Pang J, Zhu J G, Xie Z B, Liu G, Chen G P.Relations between transpiration and N uptake of rice grown in elevated air carbon dioxide concentration[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2006, 20(2):205-209.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	刘红江, 杨连新, 黄建晔, 董桂春, 朱建国, 刘钢, 王余龙. FACE对三系杂交籼稻汕优63氮素吸收利用的影响[J].农业环境科学学报, 2008, 27(3): 1015-1021.
	Liu H J, Yang L X, Huang J Y, Dong G C, Zhu J G, Liu G, Wang Y L.Effect of free-air CO2 enrichment(FACE)on phosphorus uptake and utilization of three-line indica hybrid rice cultivar Shanyou 63[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2008, 27(3): 1015-1021.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	Cotrufo MF, Ineson P, Scott AY.Elevated CO2 reduces thenitrogen concentration of plant tissues[J]. Global Change Biology, 1998, 4: 43-54.
[22]	Lin H W, Bai K Z, Kuang T Y.Effects of elevated CO2 and hightemperature on single leaf and canopy photosynthesis of rice.Acta Botanica Sinica, 1999, 41(6): 624-628.
[23]	黄建晔, 杨洪建, 董桂春. 开放式空气CO2对水稻产量形成的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2002, 13(10): 1210-1214.
	Huang J Y, Yang H J, Dong G C.Effects of free-air CO2enrichment(FACE) on yield formation in rice (Oryza sativa)[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002, 13(10): 1210-1214.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	张立极, 潘根兴, 张旭辉,李恋卿, 郑经伟, 郑聚峰, 俞欣妍, 王家芳. 大气CO2浓度和温度升高对水稻植株碳氮吸收及分配的影响[J]. 土壤, 2015, 47(1):26-32.
	Zhang L J, Pan G X, Zhang X H, Li L Q, Zheng J W, Zheng J F, Yu X Y, Wang J F.Effect of experimental CO2 enrichment and warming on uptake and distribution of C and N in rice plant[J]. Soils, 2015, 47(1): 26-32. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	刘红江, 杨连新, 黄建晔,董桂春, 杨欢, 朱建国, 刘钢, 王余龙.FACE对三系杂交籼稻汕优63产量形成的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2008,27(6):2285-2290.
	Liu H J,Yang L X, Huang J Y, Dong G C, Yang H, Zhu J G, Liu G, Wang Y L.Effect of free-air CO2enrichment(FACE)on phosphorus uptake and utilization of three-line indica hybrid rice cultivar shanyou 63[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2008, 27(6): 2285-2290. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	Kim H Y, Lieffering M, Kobayashi K, Okada M, Miura S.Seasonal changes in the effects of elevated CO2 on rice at three levels of nitrogen supply: A free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiment[J]. Global Change Biology, 2003, 9(6): 826-837.
[27]	刘红江, 杨连新, 黄建晔,董桂春, 朱建国, 刘钢, 王余龙. FACE对常规籼稻扬稻6号产量形成的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2009, 28(2): 299-304.
	Liu H J,Yang L X, Huang J Y, Dong G C, Zhu J G, Liu G, Wang Y L.Effect of free air CO2 enrichment(FACE)on yield formation of indica rice cultivar Yangdao 6[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2009, 28(2): 299-304.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	黄建晔, 董桂春, 杨洪建,王余龙, 朱建国, 杨连新, 单玉华. 开放式空气CO2增高对水稻物质生产与分配的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2003, 14(2): 253-257.
	Huang J Y, Dong G C,Yang H J, Wang Y L, Zhu J G, Yang L X, Shan Y H.Effect of free-air CO2 enrichment on biomass accumulation and distribution in rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2003, 14(2): 253-257. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	黄建晔, 杨洪建, 杨连新, 刘红江, 董桂春, 朱建国, 王余龙. 开放式空气CO2浓度增加(FACE)对水稻产量形成的影响及其与氮的互作效应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2004, 37(12): 1824-1830.
	Huang J Y, Yang H J, Yang L X, Liu H J, Dong G C, Zhu J G, Wang Y L.Effects of free-air CO2enrichment (FACE) on yield formation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) and its interaction with nitrogen[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica , 2004, 37(12): 1824-1830.
[30]	蔡威威, 艾天成, 万运帆, 李健陵, 郭晨. 环境温度和CO2浓度升高对湖北早稻氮素含量及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业气象, 2016, 37(2): 231-237.
	CaiW W, Ai T C, Wan Y F, Li J L, Guo C. Influence of elevated atmospheric temperature and CO2 concentration on plant and soil N concentration and yield of early rice in Hubei[J]. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2016, 37(2): 231-237. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]	龚金龙, 邢志鹏, 胡雅杰, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 高辉. 籼、粳超级稻氮素吸收利用与转运差异研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(4):796-810.
	Gong J L, Xing Z P, Hu Y J, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, GaoH. Differences of nitrogen uptake utilization and translocation between indica and japonica super rice[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2014, 20(4): 796-810. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32]	李超, 韦还和, 许俊伟,王子杰, 许轲, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 魏海燕, 郭保卫. 甬优系列籼粳杂交稻氮素积累与转运特征[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(5):1177-1186.
	Li C, Wei H H, Xu J W, Wang Z J, Xu K, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Wei H Y,Guo B W.Characteristics of nitrogen uptake, utilization and translocation in the indica-japonica hybrid rice of Yongyou series[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2016, 22(5): 1177-1186. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33]	陈贵, 陈梅, 张红梅, 王士磊, 施卫明, 程旺大. 籼粳杂交稻与常规粳稻产量、干物质氮素累积转运及氮素利用差异研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(12): 1992-2000.
	Chen G, Chen M, Zhang H M, Wang S L, Shi W M, Cheng W D.Differences of yield, accumulation and translocation properties of dry matter and N, and N use efficiency between indica-japonica hybrid rice and japonica rice[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2018, 30(12): 1992-2000. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34]	董桂春,于小凤,赵江宁,居静, 田昊, 李进前, 张燕, 王余龙.不同穗型常规籼稻品种氦素吸收利用的基本特点[J].作物学报,2009,35(11):2091-2100.
	Dong G C, Yu X F, Zhao J L,Ju J, Tian H, Li Q J, Zhang Y, Wang Y L.General characteristics of nitrogen uptake and utilization in conven-tional indica rice cultivars with different panicle weight types[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2009, 35(11): 2091-2100.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[35]	陈琛, 王熠, 羊彬,朱正康, 曹文雅, 罗刚, 周娟, 王祥菊, 于小凤, 袁秋梅. 株高对遗传群体水稻株系氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(22): 4450-4459.
	Chen C, Wang Y, Yang B, Cao W Y, Luo G, Zhou J, Wang X J, Yu X F, Yuan Q M.Plant height affects nitrogen absorption and utilization in rice with similar genetic background[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(22): 4450-4459. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[36]	马红亮, 朱建国, 谢祖彬,曾青, 刘钢. CO2浓度升高对水稻生物量及 C、N吸收分配的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2005, 13(3): 38-41.
	Ma H L, Zhu J G, Xie Z B, Zeng Q, Liu G.Effect of CO2 enrichment on the allocation of biomass and C, N uptake in rice organs[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2005, 13(3): 38-41.(in Chinese with English abstract)

处理 Treatment	类型 Type	品种 Variety	产量 Grain yield /(g·m^-2)	单位面积穗数 Panicle number per 1 m²	每穗颖花数Spikelet number per panicle	结实率 Seed-setting rate/%	千粒重 1000-grainweight/g
CK	常规粳稻	武运粳21 WYJ21	654.53 cB	198.5 abABC	143.6 bB	77.7 aA	29.87 bcBC
	CJR	扬辐粳8号YFJ8	659.15 cB	221.0 aA	139.8 bB	74.3 abA	28.70 cCD
	杂交籼稻	汕优63SY63	870.33 abAB	219.6 aA	157.6 bB	81.4 abA	31.49 abAB
	HIR	两优培九LYP9	929.96 aA	209.7 aAB	232.1 aA	71.2 bA	26.86 dD
	常规籼稻	扬稻6号YD6	814.64 abAB	174.6 cC	167.2 bB	87.0 aA	32.36 aA
	CIR	扬辐籼6号YFX6	759.98 bcAB	184.6 bcBC	168.0 bB	81.3 abA	30.53 bABC
平均值 Average			781.43	201.4	168.0	78.8	29.97
FACE	常规粳稻	武运粳21 WYJ21	808.12 cBC	255.8 abAB	140.1 cCD	76.0 bBC	29.95 bAB
	CJR	扬辐粳8号YFJ8	760.12 cC	279.1 aA	128.2 cD	73.7 bC	29.47 bB
	杂交籼稻	汕优63SY63	1093.28 abA	244.5 abABC	167.8 bBC	84.6 aAB	31.74 aA
	HIR	两优培九LYP9	1139.50 aA	225.4 bcBC	224.9 aA	83.2 aABC	27.24 cC
	常规籼稻	扬稻6号YD6	1061.24 abA	199.5 cC	188.6 bB	88.6 aA	32.11 aA
	CIR	扬辐籼6号YFX6	971.54 bAB	201.5 cC	182.7 bB	86.4 aA	30.70 abAB
平均值 Average			972.30	234.3	172.1	82.1	30.20
F_t			40.428**	29.900**	0.336	1.875	0.260
F_v			31.329**	22.983**	24.066**	6.355**	8.612**
F_t×v			1.137	4.213	1.174	1.126	0.095
r_y				0.082	0.557**	0.559**	0.089

处理 Treatment	类型 Type	品种 Variety	产量 Grain yield /(g·m^-2)	单位面积穗数 Panicle number per 1 m²	每穗颖花数Spikelet number per panicle	结实率 Seed-setting rate/%	千粒重 1000-grainweight/g
CK	常规粳稻	武运粳21 WYJ21	654.53 cB	198.5 abABC	143.6 bB	77.7 aA	29.87 bcBC
	CJR	扬辐粳8号YFJ8	659.15 cB	221.0 aA	139.8 bB	74.3 abA	28.70 cCD
	杂交籼稻	汕优63SY63	870.33 abAB	219.6 aA	157.6 bB	81.4 abA	31.49 abAB
	HIR	两优培九LYP9	929.96 aA	209.7 aAB	232.1 aA	71.2 bA	26.86 dD
	常规籼稻	扬稻6号YD6	814.64 abAB	174.6 cC	167.2 bB	87.0 aA	32.36 aA
	CIR	扬辐籼6号YFX6	759.98 bcAB	184.6 bcBC	168.0 bB	81.3 abA	30.53 bABC
平均值 Average			781.43	201.4	168.0	78.8	29.97
FACE	常规粳稻	武运粳21 WYJ21	808.12 cBC	255.8 abAB	140.1 cCD	76.0 bBC	29.95 bAB
	CJR	扬辐粳8号YFJ8	760.12 cC	279.1 aA	128.2 cD	73.7 bC	29.47 bB
	杂交籼稻	汕优63SY63	1093.28 abA	244.5 abABC	167.8 bBC	84.6 aAB	31.74 aA
	HIR	两优培九LYP9	1139.50 aA	225.4 bcBC	224.9 aA	83.2 aABC	27.24 cC
	常规籼稻	扬稻6号YD6	1061.24 abA	199.5 cC	188.6 bB	88.6 aA	32.11 aA
	CIR	扬辐籼6号YFX6	971.54 bAB	201.5 cC	182.7 bB	86.4 aA	30.70 abAB
平均值 Average			972.30	234.3	172.1	82.1	30.20
F_t			40.428**	29.900**	0.336	1.875	0.260
F_v			31.329**	22.983**	24.066**	6.355**	8.612**
F_t×v			1.137	4.213	1.174	1.126	0.095
r_y				0.082	0.557**	0.559**	0.089

处理 Treatment	类型 Type	品种 Variety	移栽期 Transplanting stage	分蘖期 Tillering stage	抽穗期 Heading stage	成熟期 Maturity stage
CK	常规粳稻 CJR	武运粳21 WYJ21	2.34 aAB	1.80 aA	1.45 aA	1.05 aA
	常规粳稻 CJR	扬辐粳8号YFJ8	2.38 aAB	1.75 aA	1.20 bB	0.92 abA
	杂交籼稻HIR	汕优63SY63	2.22 bB	1.99 aA	1.16 bB	0.85 bA
	杂交籼稻HIR	两优培九LYP9	2.24 aAB	2.04 aA	1.09 bB	0.95 abA
	常规籼稻CIR	扬稻6号YD6	3.04 aA	1.85 aA	1.16 bB	0.97 abA
	常规籼稻CIR	扬辐籼6号YFX6	2.75 aAB	1.86 aA	1.18 bB	0.98 abA
平均值 Average			2.50	1.89	1.21	0.95
FACE	常规粳稻 CJR	武运粳21 WYJ21	2.34 aAB	1.72 aA	1.24 aA	0.98 aA
	常规粳稻 CJR	扬辐粳8号YFJ8	2.38 aAB	1.71 aA	1.12 aA	0.87 aA
	杂交籼稻HIR	汕优63SY63	2.22 bB	1.98 aA	1.03 aA	0.86 aA
	杂交籼稻HIR	两优培九LYP9	2.24 aAB	1.79 aA	0.93 aA	0.93 aA
	常规籼稻CIR	扬稻6号YD6	3.04 aA	1.75 aA	1.05 aA	0.89 aA
	常规籼稻CIR	扬辐籼6号YFX6	2.75 aAB	1.78 aA	1.12 aA	0.98 aA
平均值 Average			2.50	1.79	1.08	0.92
F_t				1.530	8.459**	0.714
F_v			10.014**	1.986	7.979**	0.849
F_t×v				0.032	0.222	0.127
r_NAA			-0.054	-0.098	-0.287*	0.561**

处理 Treatment	类型 Type	品种 Variety	移栽期 Transplanting stage	分蘖期 Tillering stage	抽穗期 Heading stage	成熟期 Maturity stage
CK	常规粳稻 CJR	武运粳21 WYJ21	2.34 aAB	1.80 aA	1.45 aA	1.05 aA
	常规粳稻 CJR	扬辐粳8号YFJ8	2.38 aAB	1.75 aA	1.20 bB	0.92 abA
	杂交籼稻HIR	汕优63SY63	2.22 bB	1.99 aA	1.16 bB	0.85 bA
	杂交籼稻HIR	两优培九LYP9	2.24 aAB	2.04 aA	1.09 bB	0.95 abA
	常规籼稻CIR	扬稻6号YD6	3.04 aA	1.85 aA	1.16 bB	0.97 abA
	常规籼稻CIR	扬辐籼6号YFX6	2.75 aAB	1.86 aA	1.18 bB	0.98 abA
平均值 Average			2.50	1.89	1.21	0.95
FACE	常规粳稻 CJR	武运粳21 WYJ21	2.34 aAB	1.72 aA	1.24 aA	0.98 aA
	常规粳稻 CJR	扬辐粳8号YFJ8	2.38 aAB	1.71 aA	1.12 aA	0.87 aA
	杂交籼稻HIR	汕优63SY63	2.22 bB	1.98 aA	1.03 aA	0.86 aA
	杂交籼稻HIR	两优培九LYP9	2.24 aAB	1.79 aA	0.93 aA	0.93 aA
	常规籼稻CIR	扬稻6号YD6	3.04 aA	1.75 aA	1.05 aA	0.89 aA
	常规籼稻CIR	扬辐籼6号YFX6	2.75 aAB	1.78 aA	1.12 aA	0.98 aA
平均值 Average			2.50	1.79	1.08	0.92
F_t				1.530	8.459**	0.714
F_v			10.014**	1.986	7.979**	0.849
F_t×v				0.032	0.222	0.127
r_NAA			-0.054	-0.098	-0.287*	0.561**

处理 Treatment	类型 Type	品种 Variety	移栽期 Transplanting stage	分蘖期 Tillering stage	抽穗期 Heading stage	成熟期 Maturity stage
CK	常规粳稻 CJR	武运粳21 WYJ21	5.21 bcBC	90.67 dD	686.34 dC	1112.77 dD
CK	常规粳稻 CJR	扬辐粳8号YFJ8	5.35 bB	113.01 cCD	825.33 cBC	1286.28 cBC
	杂交籼稻HIR	汕优63SY63	4.08 cdCD	133.79 bBC	1005.46 bA	1358.31 bcAB
	杂交籼稻HIR	两优培九LYP9	3.60 dD	135.22 bBC	1141.62 aA	1576.69 aA
	常规籼稻CIR	扬稻6号YD6	9.07 aA	186.86 aA	1056.76 abA	1495.99 abAB
	常规籼稻CIR	扬辐籼6号YFX6	8.17 aA	153.67 bB	972.17 bAB	1369.15 bcAB
平均值 Average			5.91	135.54	947.95	1366.53
FACE	常规粳稻 CJR	武运粳21 WYJ21	5.21 bcBC	108.14 cD	742.78 dC	1382.25 bB
	常规粳稻 CJR	扬辐粳8号YFJ8	5.35 bB	127.76 cCD	1030.98 cB	1473.58 bB
	杂交籼稻HIR	汕优63SY63	4.08 cdCD	169.94 abAB	1424.38 aA	1863.12 aA
	杂交籼稻HIR	两优培九LYP9	3.60 dD	156.70 bBC	1253.98 bA	1846.88 aA
	常规籼稻CIR	扬稻6号YD6	9.07 aA	194.26 aA	1256.34 bA	1868.38 aA
	常规籼稻CIR	扬辐籼6号YFX6	8.17 aA	194.60 aA	1212.74 bAB	1826.99 aA
平均值 Average			5.91	158.57	1153.53	1710.20
F_t				10.513**	28.006**	60.370**
F_v			62.539**	35.617**	36.345**	25.871**
F_t×v				0.280	0.361	0.185
r_NAA			0.239*	0.526**	0.516**	0.691**

不同类型水稻品种产量和氮素吸收利用对大气CO₂浓度升高响应的差异

Differences in Response of Grain Yield, Nitrogen Absorption and Utilization to Elevated CO₂Concentration in Different Rice Varieties

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 36

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

处理 Treatment	类型 Type	品种 Variety	移栽-分蘖 Transplanting-tillering	分蘖-抽穗 Tillering-heading	抽穗-成熟 Heading-maturity
CK	常规粳稻 CJR	武运粳21 WYJ21	1.50 cC	8.25 aA	1.64 aA
	常规粳稻 CJR	扬辐粳8号YFJ8	1.82 cC	7.95 aA	1.74 aA
	杂交籼稻HIR	汕优63SY63	2.56 bAB	8.98 bA	-0.16 aA
	杂交籼稻HIR	两优培九LYP9	2.51 bB	9.73 aA	2.67 aA
	常规籼稻CIR	扬稻6号YD6	3.16 aA	8.80 aA	2.27 aA
	常规籼稻CIR	扬辐籼6号YFX6	2.66 bAB	8.62 aA	1.92 aA
平均值Average			2.37	8.72	1.68
FACE	常规粳稻 CJR	武运粳21 WYJ21	1.68 cB	7.32 bA	4.47 aA
	常规粳稻 CJR	扬辐粳8号YFJ8	2.03 bcB	9.39 abA	1.18 aA
	杂交籼稻HIR	汕优63SY63	3.22 aA	11.39 aA	1.37 aA
	杂交籼稻HIR	两优培九LYP9	2.68 abAB	9.01 abA	5.39 aA
	常规籼稻CIR	扬稻6号YD6	3.14 aA	9.93 abA	3.44 aA
	常规籼稻CIR	扬辐籼6号YFX6	3.29 aA	9.89 abA	4.53 aA
平均值Average			2.67	9.49	3.40
F_t			5.278*	2.119	4.467*
F_v			34.713**	3.022	0.379
F_t×v			0.221	0.299	0.134
r_NAA			0.451**	0.294*	0.721**

处理 Treatment	类型 Type	品种 Variety	抽穗期 Heading stage	成熟期 Maturity	抽穗后 After heading
CK	常规粳稻 CJR	武运粳21 WYJ21	58.32 bcB	49.18 bcAB	8.54 aA
	常规粳稻 CJR	扬辐粳8号YFJ8	52.64 cB	44.15 cB	7.92 aA
	杂交籼稻HIR	汕优63SY63	52.90 cB	53.60 bcAB	-1.06 aA
	杂交籼稻HIR	两优培九LYP9	71.82 abAB	59.05 abcAB	12.41 aA
	常规籼稻CIR	扬稻6号YD6	83.46 aA	68.84 aA	13.07 aA
	常规籼稻CIR	扬辐籼6号YFX6	72.74 abAB	61.09 abAB	10.47 aA
平均值Average			65.31	55.99	8.56
FACE	常规粳稻 CJR	武运粳21 WYJ21	54.04 cdC	35.94 bC	17.63 bB
	常规粳稻 CJR	扬辐粳8号YFJ8	46.27 dC	41.75 bBC	4.06 cC
	杂交籼稻HIR	汕优63SY63	65.68 bcBC	59.97 aAB	5.39 cC
	杂交籼稻HIR	两优培九LYP9	76.41 abAB	51.41 abABC	24.66 aA
	常规籼稻CIR	扬稻6号YD6	83.84 aAB	65.13 aA	17.37 bAB
	常规籼稻CIR	扬辐籼6号YFX6	89.22 aA	65.99 aA	22.15 aA
平均值Average			69.24	53.37	15.21
F_t			0.954	1.256	3.009
F_v			23.652**	23.625**	1.039
F_t×v			0.954	1.744	0.288
r_NAA			0.317**	0.848**	0.708**

处理 Treatment	类型 Type	品种 Variety	播种-抽穗 Sowing-heading	全生育期 Whole growth duration	抽穗-成熟 Heading-maturity
CK	常规粳稻 CJR	武运粳21 WYJ21	84.8 dC	132.5 cCD	47.7 bcB
	常规粳稻 CJR	扬辐粳8号YFJ8	92.2 bB	146.5 aA	54.3 aA
	杂交籼稻HIR	汕优63SY63	87.8 cC	131.5 cD	43.7 cB
	杂交籼稻HIR	两优培九LYP9	98.0 aA	144.2 aA	46.2 bcB
	常规籼稻CIR	扬稻6号YD6	94.2 bAB	137.8 bB	43.7 cB
	常规籼稻CIR	扬辐籼6号YFX6	91.8 bB	136.3 bBC	44.5 bcB
平均值Average			91.5	138.1	46.7
FACE	常规粳稻 CJR	武运粳21 WYJ21	82.8 dD	130.0 cC	47.2 bcB
	常规粳稻 CJR	扬辐粳8号YFJ8	90.3 cBC	144.5 aA	54.2 aA
	杂交籼稻HIR	汕优63SY63	89.2 cC	132.5 cC	43.3 cB
	杂交籼稻HIR	两优培九LYP9	95.5 aA	143.5 aA	48.0 bB
	常规籼稻CIR	扬稻6号YD6	93.7 abAB	137.7 bB	44.0 bcB
	常规籼稻CIR	扬辐籼6号YFX6	91.5 bcABC	136.2 bB	44.7 bcB
平均值Average			90.5	137.4	46.9
F_t			0.963	0.268	0.056
F_v			12.093**	0.311	19.128**
F_t×v			0.229	0.272	0.111
r_NAA			0.325**	0.043	-0.268*

处理 Treatment	类型 Type	品种 Variety	抽穗期 Heading	成熟期 Maturity	抽穗后 After heading
CK	常规粳稻CJR	武运粳21 WYJ21	116.21 aA	86.80abA	32.04 aA
	常规粳稻CJR	扬辐粳8号YFJ8	107.32 aA	79.57 bA	32.09 aA
	杂交籼稻HIR	汕优63SY63	132.14 aA	87.08 abA	-4.01 aA
	杂交籼稻HIR	两优培九LYP9	125.60 aA	103.52 aA	55.69 aA
	常规籼稻CIR	扬稻6号YD6	129.62 aA	105.30 aA	51.22 aA
	常规籼稻CIR	扬辐籼6号YFX6	124.27 aA	98.41 abA	40.49 aA
平均值Average			122.53	93.45	34.59
FACE	常规粳稻 CJR	武运粳21 WYJ21	109.84 bB	104.54 bcAB	90.89 aA
	常规粳稻 CJR	扬辐粳8号YFJ8	127.76 bAB	88.25 cB	23.76 aA
	杂交籼稻HIR	汕优63SY63	164.67 aA	121.31 abAB	30.23 aA
	杂交籼稻HIR	两优培九LYP9	123.13 bAB	120.21 abAB	121.82 aA
	常规籼稻CIR	扬稻6号YD6	142.03 abAB	121.83 abAB	78.80 aA
	常规籼稻CIR	扬辐籼6号YFX6	146.01 abAB	131.34 aA	104.21 aA
平均值Average			135.57	114.58	74.95
F_t			5.189*	16.917**	5.109*
F_v			5.787**	8.143**	0.647
F_t×v			0.286	0.595	0.184
r_NAA			0.344**	0.987**	0.735**

处理 Treatment	类型 Type	品种 Variety	茎鞘 Stem and sheath	叶 Leaf	穗 Panicle
CK	常规粳稻 CJR	武运粳21 WYJ21	2.14 cB	1.23 bA	8.14 abA
	常规粳稻 CJR	扬辐粳8号YFJ8	3.15 abAB	1.63 abA	6.87 bA
	杂交籼稻HIR	汕优63SY63	2.72 bcAB	1.36 bA	7.37 abA
	杂交籼稻HIR	两优培九LYP9	3.72 aA	1.57 abA	9.68 aA
	常规籼稻CIR	扬稻6号YD6	3.29 abA	2.30 aA	8.92 abA
	常规籼稻CIR	扬辐籼6号YFX6	3.49 abA	1.95 abA	7.98 abA
平均值Average			3.09	1.67	8.16
FACE	常规粳稻 CJR	武运粳21 WYJ21	2.59 bB	1.31 cB	9.69 abA
	常规粳稻 CJR	扬辐粳8号YFJ8	3.46 aA	1.37 cB	7.89 bA
	杂交籼稻HIR	汕优63SY63	4.05 aAB	1.81 cAB	10.21 abA
	杂交籼稻HIR	两优培九LYP9	3.22 abAB	4.05 abAB	9.88 abA
	常规籼稻CIR	扬稻6号YD6	3.75 aAB	2.26 bcAB	10.77 aA
	常规籼稻CIR	扬辐籼6号YFX6	3.56 aAB	4.62 aA	9.76 abA
平均值Average			3.44	2.57	9.70
F_t			2.508	4.784*	10.081**
F_v			3.751*	3.911*	2.586
F_t×v			0.040	1.447	0.099
r_NAA			0.641**	0.682**	0.748**

[1]	郭展, 张运波. 水稻对干旱胁迫的生理生化响应及分子调控研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 335-349.
[2]	韦还和, 马唯一, 左博源, 汪璐璐, 朱旺, 耿孝宇, 张翔, 孟天瑶, 陈英龙, 高平磊, 许轲, 霍中洋, 戴其根. 盐、干旱及其复合胁迫对水稻产量和品质形成影响的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 350-363.
[3]	许丹洁, 林巧霞, 李正康, 庄小倩, 凌宇, 赖美玲, 陈晓婷, 鲁国东. OsOPR10正调控水稻对稻瘟病和白叶枯病的抗性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 364-374.
[4]	候小琴, 王莹, 余贝, 符卫蒙, 奉保华, 沈煜潮, 谢杭军, 王焕然, 许用强, 武志海, 王建军, 陶龙兴, 符冠富. 黄腐酸钾提高水稻秧苗耐盐性的作用途径分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 409-421.
[5]	吕宙, 易秉怀, 陈平平, 周文新, 唐文帮, 易镇邪. 施氮量与移栽密度对小粒型杂交水稻产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 422-436.
[6]	胡继杰, 胡志华, 张均华, 曹小闯, 金千瑜, 章志远, 朱练峰. 根际饱和溶解氧对水稻分蘖期光合及生长特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 437-446.
[7]	刘福祥, 甄浩洋, 彭焕, 郑刘春, 彭德良, 文艳华. 广东省水稻孢囊线虫病调查与鉴定[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 456-461.
[8]	陈浩田, 秦缘, 钟笑涵, 林晨语, 秦竞航, 杨建昌, 张伟杨. 水稻根系和土壤性状与稻田甲烷排放关系的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 233-245.
[9]	缪军, 冉金晖, 徐梦彬, 卜柳冰, 王平, 梁国华, 周勇. 过量表达异三聚体G蛋白γ亚基基因RGG2提高水稻抗旱性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 246-255.
[10]	尹潇潇, 张芷菡, 颜绣莲, 廖蓉, 杨思葭, 郭岱铭, 樊晶, 赵志学, 王文明. 多个稻曲病菌效应因子的信号肽验证和表达分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 256-265.
[11]	朱裕敬, 桂金鑫, 龚成云, 罗新阳, 石居斌, 张海清, 贺记外. 全基因组关联分析定位水稻分蘖角度QTL[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 266-276.
[12]	赵艺婷, 谢可冉, 高逖, 崔克辉. 水稻分蘖期干旱锻炼对幼穗分化期高温下穗发育和产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 277-289.
[13]	魏倩倩, 汪玉磊, 孔海民, 徐青山, 颜玉莲, 潘林, 迟春欣, 孔亚丽, 田文昊, 朱练峰, 曹小闯, 张均华, 朱春权. 信号分子硫化氢参与硫肥缓解铝对水稻生长抑制作用的机制[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 290-302.
[14]	周甜, 吴少华, 康建宏, 吴宏亮, 杨生龙, 王星强, 李昱, 黄玉峰. 不同种植模式对水稻籽粒淀粉含量及淀粉关键酶活性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 303-315.
[15]	关雅琪, 鄂志国, 王磊, 申红芳. 影响中国水稻生产环节外包发展因素的实证研究：基于群体效应视角[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 324-334.