中国水稻科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3): 269-281.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2019.8112
吴培1, 陈天晔1, 袁嘉琦1, 黄恒1, 邢志鹏1, 胡雅杰1,*(), 朱明1, 李德剑2, 刘国林2, 张洪程1,*()
收稿日期:
2018-10-15
修回日期:
2018-11-18
出版日期:
2019-05-10
发布日期:
2019-05-10
通讯作者:
胡雅杰,张洪程
基金资助:
Pei WU1, Tianye CHEN1, Jiaqi YUAN1, Heng HUANG1, Zhipeng XING1, Yajie HU1,*(), Ming ZHU1, Dejian LI2, Guolin LIU2, Hongcheng ZHANG1,*()
Received:
2018-10-15
Revised:
2018-11-18
Online:
2019-05-10
Published:
2019-05-10
Contact:
Yajie HU, Hongcheng ZHANG
摘要:
【目的】旨在阐明施氮量和直播密度互作对水稻产量形成特征的影响。【方法】以优质食味粳稻南粳9108为试验材料,设置4个施氮量处理,即N1(0 kg/hm2)、N2(150 kg/hm2)、N3(225 kg/hm2)、N4(300 kg/hm2),5个直播密度处理,即D1(90×104/hm2)、D2(180×104/hm2)、D3(270×104/hm2)、D4(360×104/hm2)、D5(450×104/hm2)。【结果】随施氮量增加,机直播稻产量增加。在N1、N2和N3施氮量下,机直播稻产量随直播密度增加先增后降,分别在D4、D3和D2密度下获得最高产量,其最高产量分别为6.74、7.78和8.93 t/hm2;在N4施氮量下,水稻产量随直播密度增加而降低,在D1密度下获得最高产量,为9.55 t/hm2。不同施氮量下采用适宜直播密度可以提高水稻产量,其中N4施氮量配套D1直播密度机直播稻产量最高,其有效穗数适宜,穗型较大,生育中后期LAI较大、光合势高,生育后期群体生长率、净同化率和干物质积累量等指标均较优。【结论】机直播稻在300 kg/hm2的高氮水平下易取得高产,配套适宜直播密度可进一步提高水稻产量,但从稻田绿色生产和节本增效角度考虑,机直播稻适当降低施氮量至225 kg/hm2,配套180×104/hm2直播密度仍可获得9 t/hm2左右的产量,也值得推广。
中图分类号:
吴培, 陈天晔, 袁嘉琦, 黄恒, 邢志鹏, 胡雅杰, 朱明, 李德剑, 刘国林, 张洪程. 施氮量和直播密度互作对水稻产量形成特征的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(3): 269-281.
Pei WU, Tianye CHEN, Jiaqi YUAN, Heng HUANG, Zhipeng XING, Yajie HU, Ming ZHU, Dejian LI, Guolin LIU, Hongcheng ZHANG. Effects of Interaction Between Nitrogen Application Rate and Direct-sowing Density on Yield Formation Characteristics of Rice[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2019, 33(3): 269-281.
施氮量 Nitrogen application rate | 直播密度 Direct-sowing density | 播种期 Sowing (Month-Day) | 拔节期 Jointing (Month-Day) | 抽穗期 Heading (Month-Day) | 成熟期 Maturity (Month-Day) | 播种-拔节 Sowing- Jointing/d | 拔节-抽穗 Jointing- Heading/d | 抽穗-成熟 Heading- Maturity/d | 总生育期 Total period of duration/d) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N1 | D1 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-01 | 10-25 | 59 | 22 | 54 | 135 |
D2 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-01 | 10-25 | 59 | 22 | 54 | 135 | |
D3 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-01 | 10-25 | 59 | 22 | 54 | 135 | |
D4 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-01 | 10-25 | 59 | 22 | 54 | 135 | |
D5 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-01 | 10-25 | 59 | 22 | 54 | 135 | |
N2 | D1 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-02 | 10-27 | 59 | 23 | 55 | 137 |
D2 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-02 | 10-27 | 59 | 23 | 55 | 137 | |
D3 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-02 | 10-27 | 59 | 23 | 55 | 137 | |
D4 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-02 | 10-27 | 59 | 23 | 55 | 137 | |
D5 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-02 | 10-27 | 59 | 23 | 55 | 137 | |
N3 | D1 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-04 | 10-30 | 59 | 25 | 56 | 140 |
D2 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-04 | 10-30 | 59 | 25 | 56 | 140 | |
D3 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-04 | 10-30 | 59 | 25 | 56 | 140 | |
D4 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-04 | 10-30 | 59 | 25 | 56 | 140 | |
D5 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-04 | 10-30 | 59 | 25 | 56 | 140 | |
N4 | D1 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-05 | 11-03 | 59 | 26 | 59 | 144 |
D2 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-05 | 11-03 | 59 | 26 | 59 | 144 | |
D3 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-05 | 11-03 | 59 | 26 | 59 | 144 | |
D4 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-05 | 11-03 | 59 | 26 | 59 | 144 | |
D5 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-05 | 11-03 | 59 | 26 | 59 | 144 |
表1 氮密互作对机直播稻生育进程的影响
Table 1 Effect of nitrogen-density interaction on the growth stage in mechanical direct-sowing rice.
施氮量 Nitrogen application rate | 直播密度 Direct-sowing density | 播种期 Sowing (Month-Day) | 拔节期 Jointing (Month-Day) | 抽穗期 Heading (Month-Day) | 成熟期 Maturity (Month-Day) | 播种-拔节 Sowing- Jointing/d | 拔节-抽穗 Jointing- Heading/d | 抽穗-成熟 Heading- Maturity/d | 总生育期 Total period of duration/d) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N1 | D1 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-01 | 10-25 | 59 | 22 | 54 | 135 |
D2 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-01 | 10-25 | 59 | 22 | 54 | 135 | |
D3 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-01 | 10-25 | 59 | 22 | 54 | 135 | |
D4 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-01 | 10-25 | 59 | 22 | 54 | 135 | |
D5 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-01 | 10-25 | 59 | 22 | 54 | 135 | |
N2 | D1 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-02 | 10-27 | 59 | 23 | 55 | 137 |
D2 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-02 | 10-27 | 59 | 23 | 55 | 137 | |
D3 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-02 | 10-27 | 59 | 23 | 55 | 137 | |
D4 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-02 | 10-27 | 59 | 23 | 55 | 137 | |
D5 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-02 | 10-27 | 59 | 23 | 55 | 137 | |
N3 | D1 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-04 | 10-30 | 59 | 25 | 56 | 140 |
D2 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-04 | 10-30 | 59 | 25 | 56 | 140 | |
D3 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-04 | 10-30 | 59 | 25 | 56 | 140 | |
D4 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-04 | 10-30 | 59 | 25 | 56 | 140 | |
D5 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-04 | 10-30 | 59 | 25 | 56 | 140 | |
N4 | D1 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-05 | 11-03 | 59 | 26 | 59 | 144 |
D2 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-05 | 11-03 | 59 | 26 | 59 | 144 | |
D3 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-05 | 11-03 | 59 | 26 | 59 | 144 | |
D4 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-05 | 11-03 | 59 | 26 | 59 | 144 | |
D5 | 06-12 | 08-10 | 09-05 | 11-03 | 59 | 26 | 59 | 144 |
施氮量 Nitrogen application rate | 直播密度 Direct-sowing density | 有效穗数 Productive panicle number/(×104·hm-2) | 每穗颖花数 Spikelet number per panicle | 群体颖花量 Population spikelet number/(×104·hm-2) | 结实率 Seed-setting rate/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | 2017年实产 2017 yield /(t·hm-2) | 2016年实产 2016 yield /(t·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N1 | D1 | 283.14 j | 82.1 ghi | 23 249.40 j | 96.09 ab | 27.32 abc | 5.78 k | 5.89 l |
D2 | 307.45 i | 80.3 hij | 24 695.30 ij | 96.60 ab | 27.40 abc | 6.17 j | 6.27 kl | |
D3 | 325.82 gh | 77.9 ij | 25 373.73 ij | 96.84 ab | 27.65 ab | 6.45 ij | 6.50 jk | |
D4 | 342.88 f | 76.9 j | 26 358.36 i | 96.97 a | 27.77 a | 6.74 i | 6.90 ij | |
D5 | 352.54 ef | 71.4 k | 25 174.86 ij | 96.53 ab | 27.64 ab | 6.39 ij | 6.51 jk | |
均值Mean | 322.37 | 77.7 | 24 970.33 | 96.61 | 27.56 | 6.31 | 6.42 | |
N2 | D1 | 316.68 hi | 93.4 de | 29 588.39 h | 93.53 abc | 26.93 abc | 7.18 h | 7.24 hi |
D2 | 346.20 f | 89.2 ef | 30 865.57 fgh | 93.68 abc | 26.96 abc | 7.44 fgh | 7.54 fgh | |
D3 | 364.92 de | 87.8 f | 32 024.54 fg | 93.88 abc | 27.04 abc | 7.78 ef | 7.80 ef | |
D4 | 378.09 cd | 80.6 hij | 30 454.85 gh | 94.08 abc | 27.38 abc | 7.49 fgh | 7.61 fgh | |
D5 | 388.05 bc | 77.1 ij | 29 915.10 gh | 94.74 abc | 27.17 abc | 7.30 gh | 7.33 gh | |
均值Mean | 358.79 | 85.6 | 30 569.69 | 93.98 | 27.10 | 7.44 | 7.50 | |
N3 | D1 | 338.37 fg | 108.0 b | 36 526.07 cd | 92.09 abc | 26.48 abc | 8.53 c | 8.61 cd |
D2 | 368.43 de | 101.9 c | 37 559.49 bc | 93.35 abc | 26.57 abc | 8.93 b | 8.99 bc | |
D3 | 381.60 cd | 93.3 de | 35 594.16 cd | 93.49 abc | 26.84 abc | 8.47 c | 8.54 d | |
D4 | 391.59 abc | 84.4 fgh | 33 058.59 ef | 93.52 abc | 26.75 abc | 8.05 de | 8.20 de | |
D5 | 398.60 ab | 79.0 ij | 31 488.32 fgh | 93.21 abc | 26.90 abc | 7.59 fg | 7.72 fg | |
均值Mean | 375.72 | 93.3 | 34 845.33 | 93.13 | 26.71 | 8.32 | 8.41 | |
N4 | D1 | 354.90 ef | 115.4 a | 40 968.00 a | 91.09 c | 26.02 c | 9.55 a | 9.72 a |
D2 | 380.64 cd | 104.2 bc | 39 652.43 ab | 91.92 bc | 26.08 c | 9.33 a | 9.40 ab | |
D3 | 394.53 abc | 94.7 d | 37 351.11 c | 92.69 abc | 26.29 bc | 8.94 b | 8.99 bc | |
D4 | 402.48 ab | 86.7 fg | 34 885.22 de | 92.96 abc | 26.44 abc | 8.38 cd | 8.44 d | |
D5 | 407.94 a | 80.7 hij | 32 913.54 ef | 92.49 abc | 26.14 c | 7.70 ef | 7.76 f | |
均值Mean | 388.10 | 96.3 | 37 154.06 | 92.23 | 26.20 | 8.78 | 8.86 | |
方差分析 Variance analysis | N | ** | ** | ** | ns | ns | ** | ** |
D | ** | ** | ** | ns | ns | ** | ** | |
N×D | ns | ** | ** | ns | ns | ** | ** |
表2 氮密互作对机直播稻产量及其构成因素的影响
Table 2 Effect of nitrogen-density interaction on the yield and yield components in mechanical direct-sowing rice.
施氮量 Nitrogen application rate | 直播密度 Direct-sowing density | 有效穗数 Productive panicle number/(×104·hm-2) | 每穗颖花数 Spikelet number per panicle | 群体颖花量 Population spikelet number/(×104·hm-2) | 结实率 Seed-setting rate/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | 2017年实产 2017 yield /(t·hm-2) | 2016年实产 2016 yield /(t·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N1 | D1 | 283.14 j | 82.1 ghi | 23 249.40 j | 96.09 ab | 27.32 abc | 5.78 k | 5.89 l |
D2 | 307.45 i | 80.3 hij | 24 695.30 ij | 96.60 ab | 27.40 abc | 6.17 j | 6.27 kl | |
D3 | 325.82 gh | 77.9 ij | 25 373.73 ij | 96.84 ab | 27.65 ab | 6.45 ij | 6.50 jk | |
D4 | 342.88 f | 76.9 j | 26 358.36 i | 96.97 a | 27.77 a | 6.74 i | 6.90 ij | |
D5 | 352.54 ef | 71.4 k | 25 174.86 ij | 96.53 ab | 27.64 ab | 6.39 ij | 6.51 jk | |
均值Mean | 322.37 | 77.7 | 24 970.33 | 96.61 | 27.56 | 6.31 | 6.42 | |
N2 | D1 | 316.68 hi | 93.4 de | 29 588.39 h | 93.53 abc | 26.93 abc | 7.18 h | 7.24 hi |
D2 | 346.20 f | 89.2 ef | 30 865.57 fgh | 93.68 abc | 26.96 abc | 7.44 fgh | 7.54 fgh | |
D3 | 364.92 de | 87.8 f | 32 024.54 fg | 93.88 abc | 27.04 abc | 7.78 ef | 7.80 ef | |
D4 | 378.09 cd | 80.6 hij | 30 454.85 gh | 94.08 abc | 27.38 abc | 7.49 fgh | 7.61 fgh | |
D5 | 388.05 bc | 77.1 ij | 29 915.10 gh | 94.74 abc | 27.17 abc | 7.30 gh | 7.33 gh | |
均值Mean | 358.79 | 85.6 | 30 569.69 | 93.98 | 27.10 | 7.44 | 7.50 | |
N3 | D1 | 338.37 fg | 108.0 b | 36 526.07 cd | 92.09 abc | 26.48 abc | 8.53 c | 8.61 cd |
D2 | 368.43 de | 101.9 c | 37 559.49 bc | 93.35 abc | 26.57 abc | 8.93 b | 8.99 bc | |
D3 | 381.60 cd | 93.3 de | 35 594.16 cd | 93.49 abc | 26.84 abc | 8.47 c | 8.54 d | |
D4 | 391.59 abc | 84.4 fgh | 33 058.59 ef | 93.52 abc | 26.75 abc | 8.05 de | 8.20 de | |
D5 | 398.60 ab | 79.0 ij | 31 488.32 fgh | 93.21 abc | 26.90 abc | 7.59 fg | 7.72 fg | |
均值Mean | 375.72 | 93.3 | 34 845.33 | 93.13 | 26.71 | 8.32 | 8.41 | |
N4 | D1 | 354.90 ef | 115.4 a | 40 968.00 a | 91.09 c | 26.02 c | 9.55 a | 9.72 a |
D2 | 380.64 cd | 104.2 bc | 39 652.43 ab | 91.92 bc | 26.08 c | 9.33 a | 9.40 ab | |
D3 | 394.53 abc | 94.7 d | 37 351.11 c | 92.69 abc | 26.29 bc | 8.94 b | 8.99 bc | |
D4 | 402.48 ab | 86.7 fg | 34 885.22 de | 92.96 abc | 26.44 abc | 8.38 cd | 8.44 d | |
D5 | 407.94 a | 80.7 hij | 32 913.54 ef | 92.49 abc | 26.14 c | 7.70 ef | 7.76 f | |
均值Mean | 388.10 | 96.3 | 37 154.06 | 92.23 | 26.20 | 8.78 | 8.86 | |
方差分析 Variance analysis | N | ** | ** | ** | ns | ns | ** | ** |
D | ** | ** | ** | ns | ns | ** | ** | |
N×D | ns | ** | ** | ns | ns | ** | ** |
施氮量 Nitrogen application rate | 产量构成因素 Yield components | 产量构成因素间相关系数 Correlation coefficient among yield components | 对Y效应 Effect on Y (Pi-Y) | 对X3效应 Effect on X3 (Pi-X3) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | Y(Yield) | ||||
N1 | 有效穗数Productive panicle number (X1) | -0.920* | 0.850 | 0.697 | 0.898* | 0.866 | 2.081 | |
每穗颖花数Spikelet number per panicle (X2) | -0.575 | -0.375 | -0.696 | -0.602 | 1.339 | |||
群体颖花量Population spikelet number (X3) | 0.957* | 0.936* | 0.997** | 0.759 | ||||
结实率Seed-setting rate (X4) | 0.847 | 0.945* | 0.027 | |||||
千粒重1000-grain weight (X5) | 0.960** | 0.227 | ||||||
N2 | 有效穗数 Productive panicle number (X1) | -0.942* | 0.234 | 0.867 | 0.770 | 0.391 | 2.951 | |
每穗颖花数Spikelet number per panicle (X2) | 0.105 | -0.940* | -0.812 | -0.064 | 2.885 | |||
群体颖花量Population spikelet number (X3) | -0.168 | -0.057 | 0.971** | 0.983 | ||||
结实率Seed-setting rate (X4) | 0.593 | -0.038 | -0.008 | |||||
千粒重1000-grain weight (X5) | 0.167 | 0.228 | ||||||
N3 | 有效穗数Productive panicle number (X1) | -0.948* | -0.769 | 0.837 | 0.906* | -0.663 | 1.146 | |
每穗颖花数Spikelet number per panicle (X2) | 0.932* | -0.630 | -0.897* | 0.864 | 2.019 | |||
群体颖花量Population spikelet number (X3) | -0.309 | -0.770 | 0.984** | 0.926 | ||||
结实率Seed-setting rate (X4) | 0.674 | -0.154 | 0.251 | |||||
千粒重1000-grain weight (X5) | -0.721 | -0.176 | ||||||
N4 | 有效穗数Productive panicle number (X1) | -0.981** | -0.927* | 0.932* | 0.671 | -0.880* | 0.968 | |
每穗颖花数Spikelet number per panicle (X2) | 0.982** | -0.877 | -0.626 | 0.953* | 1.932 | |||
群体颖花量Population spikelet number (X3) | -0.791 | -0.558 | 0.990** | 1.135 | ||||
结实率Seed-setting rate (X4) | 0.876 | -0.698 | 0.119 | |||||
千粒重1000-grain weight (X5) | -0.437 | 0.092 |
表3 产量与其构成因素之间的相关系数及直接通径系数
Table 3 Correlation coefficients and path coefficients between yield and its components.
施氮量 Nitrogen application rate | 产量构成因素 Yield components | 产量构成因素间相关系数 Correlation coefficient among yield components | 对Y效应 Effect on Y (Pi-Y) | 对X3效应 Effect on X3 (Pi-X3) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | Y(Yield) | ||||
N1 | 有效穗数Productive panicle number (X1) | -0.920* | 0.850 | 0.697 | 0.898* | 0.866 | 2.081 | |
每穗颖花数Spikelet number per panicle (X2) | -0.575 | -0.375 | -0.696 | -0.602 | 1.339 | |||
群体颖花量Population spikelet number (X3) | 0.957* | 0.936* | 0.997** | 0.759 | ||||
结实率Seed-setting rate (X4) | 0.847 | 0.945* | 0.027 | |||||
千粒重1000-grain weight (X5) | 0.960** | 0.227 | ||||||
N2 | 有效穗数 Productive panicle number (X1) | -0.942* | 0.234 | 0.867 | 0.770 | 0.391 | 2.951 | |
每穗颖花数Spikelet number per panicle (X2) | 0.105 | -0.940* | -0.812 | -0.064 | 2.885 | |||
群体颖花量Population spikelet number (X3) | -0.168 | -0.057 | 0.971** | 0.983 | ||||
结实率Seed-setting rate (X4) | 0.593 | -0.038 | -0.008 | |||||
千粒重1000-grain weight (X5) | 0.167 | 0.228 | ||||||
N3 | 有效穗数Productive panicle number (X1) | -0.948* | -0.769 | 0.837 | 0.906* | -0.663 | 1.146 | |
每穗颖花数Spikelet number per panicle (X2) | 0.932* | -0.630 | -0.897* | 0.864 | 2.019 | |||
群体颖花量Population spikelet number (X3) | -0.309 | -0.770 | 0.984** | 0.926 | ||||
结实率Seed-setting rate (X4) | 0.674 | -0.154 | 0.251 | |||||
千粒重1000-grain weight (X5) | -0.721 | -0.176 | ||||||
N4 | 有效穗数Productive panicle number (X1) | -0.981** | -0.927* | 0.932* | 0.671 | -0.880* | 0.968 | |
每穗颖花数Spikelet number per panicle (X2) | 0.982** | -0.877 | -0.626 | 0.953* | 1.932 | |||
群体颖花量Population spikelet number (X3) | -0.791 | -0.558 | 0.990** | 1.135 | ||||
结实率Seed-setting rate (X4) | 0.876 | -0.698 | 0.119 | |||||
千粒重1000-grain weight (X5) | -0.437 | 0.092 |
施氮量 Nitrogen application rate | 直播密度 Direct-sowing density | 茎蘖数 No. of stems and tillers/(×104· hm-2) | 茎蘖成穗率 Percentage of productive tillers /% | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
拔节期 Jointing | 抽穗期 Heading | 成熟期 Maturity | |||
N1 | D1 | 395.34 j | 293.70 l | 283.14 k | 71.62 abc |
D2 | 443.52 i | 319.80 k | 307.45 j | 69.32 cde | |
D3 | 482.62 gh | 344.70 ij | 325.82 hi | 67.51 def | |
D4 | 539.38 e | 363.75 ghi | 342.88 gh | 63.57 gh | |
D5 | 604.70 c | 381.60 efg | 352.54 fg | 58.30 j | |
均值Mean | 493.11 | 340.71 | 322.37 | 66.06 | |
N2 | D1 | 433.16 i | 331.05 jk | 316.68 ij | 73.11 a |
D2 | 475.81 h | 366.15 fghi | 346.20 g | 72.76 a | |
D3 | 506.83 f | 388.35 def | 364.92 ef | 72.00 abc | |
D4 | 567.11 d | 406.80 cd | 378.09 de | 66.67 ef | |
D5 | 645.57 b | 423.60 bc | 388.05 bcd | 60.11 ij | |
均值Mean | 525.70 | 383.19 | 358.79 | 68.93 | |
N3 | D1 | 467.88 h | 358.35 hi | 338.37 gh | 72.32 ab |
D2 | 512.56 f | 392.55 de | 368.43 ef | 71.88 abc | |
D3 | 545.92 de | 410.10 cd | 381.60 cde | 69.90 bcd | |
D4 | 595.66 c | 421.80 bc | 391.59 abcd | 65.74 fg | |
D5 | 665.77 b | 436.50 ab | 398.60 abc | 59.87 ij | |
均值Mean | 557.56 | 403.86 | 375.72 | 67.94 | |
N4 | D1 | 501.63 fg | 377.10 efgh | 354.90 fg | 70.75 abc |
D2 | 549.98 de | 405.45 cd | 380.64 cde | 69.21 cde | |
D3 | 593.72 c | 427.35 bc | 394.53 abcd | 66.45 f | |
D4 | 647.28 b | 437.70 ab | 402.48 ab | 62.18 hi | |
D5 | 705.66 a | 451.65 a | 407.94 a | 57.81 j | |
均值Mean | 599.65 | 419.85 | 388.10 | 65.28 | |
方差分析 Variance analysis | N | ** | ** | ** | * |
D | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
N×D | ns | ns | ns | ns |
表4 氮密互作对机直播稻茎蘖数和成穗率的影响
Table 4 Effect of nitrogen-density interaction on the number of stems and tillers and the percentage of productive tillers in mechanical direct-sowing rice.
施氮量 Nitrogen application rate | 直播密度 Direct-sowing density | 茎蘖数 No. of stems and tillers/(×104· hm-2) | 茎蘖成穗率 Percentage of productive tillers /% | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
拔节期 Jointing | 抽穗期 Heading | 成熟期 Maturity | |||
N1 | D1 | 395.34 j | 293.70 l | 283.14 k | 71.62 abc |
D2 | 443.52 i | 319.80 k | 307.45 j | 69.32 cde | |
D3 | 482.62 gh | 344.70 ij | 325.82 hi | 67.51 def | |
D4 | 539.38 e | 363.75 ghi | 342.88 gh | 63.57 gh | |
D5 | 604.70 c | 381.60 efg | 352.54 fg | 58.30 j | |
均值Mean | 493.11 | 340.71 | 322.37 | 66.06 | |
N2 | D1 | 433.16 i | 331.05 jk | 316.68 ij | 73.11 a |
D2 | 475.81 h | 366.15 fghi | 346.20 g | 72.76 a | |
D3 | 506.83 f | 388.35 def | 364.92 ef | 72.00 abc | |
D4 | 567.11 d | 406.80 cd | 378.09 de | 66.67 ef | |
D5 | 645.57 b | 423.60 bc | 388.05 bcd | 60.11 ij | |
均值Mean | 525.70 | 383.19 | 358.79 | 68.93 | |
N3 | D1 | 467.88 h | 358.35 hi | 338.37 gh | 72.32 ab |
D2 | 512.56 f | 392.55 de | 368.43 ef | 71.88 abc | |
D3 | 545.92 de | 410.10 cd | 381.60 cde | 69.90 bcd | |
D4 | 595.66 c | 421.80 bc | 391.59 abcd | 65.74 fg | |
D5 | 665.77 b | 436.50 ab | 398.60 abc | 59.87 ij | |
均值Mean | 557.56 | 403.86 | 375.72 | 67.94 | |
N4 | D1 | 501.63 fg | 377.10 efgh | 354.90 fg | 70.75 abc |
D2 | 549.98 de | 405.45 cd | 380.64 cde | 69.21 cde | |
D3 | 593.72 c | 427.35 bc | 394.53 abcd | 66.45 f | |
D4 | 647.28 b | 437.70 ab | 402.48 ab | 62.18 hi | |
D5 | 705.66 a | 451.65 a | 407.94 a | 57.81 j | |
均值Mean | 599.65 | 419.85 | 388.10 | 65.28 | |
方差分析 Variance analysis | N | ** | ** | ** | * |
D | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
N×D | ns | ns | ns | ns |
施氮量 Nitrogen application rate | 直播密度 Direct-sowing density | 叶面积指数 Leaf area index | 结实期叶面积衰减率 Decreasing rate of leaf area at grain-filling stage/ (LAI·d-1) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
拔节期 Jointing | 抽穗期 Heading | 成熟期 Maturity | |||
N1 | D1 | 2.21 l | 4.38 j | 1.55 l | 0.0522 h |
D2 | 2.49 k | 4.79 i | 1.90 k | 0.0536 gh | |
D3 | 2.68 j | 5.01 hi | 2.03 jk | 0.0552 fgh | |
D4 | 3.09 i | 5.13 h | 2.11 j | 0.0560 fg | |
D5 | 3.31 h | 4.98 hi | 1.94 jk | 0.0564 fg | |
均值Mean | 2.76 | 4.86 | 1.90 | 0.0547 | |
N2 | D1 | 3.46 h | 6.43 g | 3.15 hi | 0.0595 de |
D2 | 3.77 g | 6.82 ef | 3.48 fg | 0.0607 cde | |
D3 | 3.99 f | 7.04 de | 3.68 e | 0.0610 cde | |
D4 | 4.37 d | 6.97 def | 3.39 g | 0.0651 ab | |
D5 | 4.64 bc | 6.64 fg | 3.02 i | 0.0659 a | |
均值Mean | 4.04 | 6.78 | 3.34 | 0.0624 | |
N3 | D1 | 3.74 g | 7.19 cd | 3.83 de | 0.0601 de |
D2 | 3.97 f | 7.44 bc | 3.99 cd | 0.0617 cd | |
D3 | 4.22 de | 7.22 cd | 3.65 ef | 0.0638 abc | |
D4 | 4.55 c | 7.05 de | 3.40 g | 0.0651 ab | |
D5 | 4.79 ab | 6.92 def | 3.20 h | 0.0664 a | |
均值Mean | 4.25 | 7.16 | 3.61 | 0.0628 | |
N4 | D1 | 4.06 ef | 7.92 a | 4.49 a | 0.0581 ef |
D2 | 4.24 d | 7.84 a | 4.30 b | 0.0600 de | |
D3 | 4.67 bc | 7.67 ab | 4.04 c | 0.0615 cd | |
D4 | 4.71 abc | 7.41 bc | 3.72 e | 0.0625 bcd | |
D5 | 4.87 a | 7.20 cd | 3.45 g | 0.0636 abc | |
均值Mean | 4.51 | 7.61 | 4.00 | 0.0611 | |
方差分析 Variance analysis | N | ** | ** | ** | ** |
D | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
N×D | ns | ** | ** | ns |
表5 氮密互作对机直播稻叶面积指数及结实期叶面积衰减率的影响
Table 5 Effect of nitrogen-density interaction on leaf area index and decreasing rate of leaf area at grain-filling stage in mechanical direct-sowing rice.
施氮量 Nitrogen application rate | 直播密度 Direct-sowing density | 叶面积指数 Leaf area index | 结实期叶面积衰减率 Decreasing rate of leaf area at grain-filling stage/ (LAI·d-1) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
拔节期 Jointing | 抽穗期 Heading | 成熟期 Maturity | |||
N1 | D1 | 2.21 l | 4.38 j | 1.55 l | 0.0522 h |
D2 | 2.49 k | 4.79 i | 1.90 k | 0.0536 gh | |
D3 | 2.68 j | 5.01 hi | 2.03 jk | 0.0552 fgh | |
D4 | 3.09 i | 5.13 h | 2.11 j | 0.0560 fg | |
D5 | 3.31 h | 4.98 hi | 1.94 jk | 0.0564 fg | |
均值Mean | 2.76 | 4.86 | 1.90 | 0.0547 | |
N2 | D1 | 3.46 h | 6.43 g | 3.15 hi | 0.0595 de |
D2 | 3.77 g | 6.82 ef | 3.48 fg | 0.0607 cde | |
D3 | 3.99 f | 7.04 de | 3.68 e | 0.0610 cde | |
D4 | 4.37 d | 6.97 def | 3.39 g | 0.0651 ab | |
D5 | 4.64 bc | 6.64 fg | 3.02 i | 0.0659 a | |
均值Mean | 4.04 | 6.78 | 3.34 | 0.0624 | |
N3 | D1 | 3.74 g | 7.19 cd | 3.83 de | 0.0601 de |
D2 | 3.97 f | 7.44 bc | 3.99 cd | 0.0617 cd | |
D3 | 4.22 de | 7.22 cd | 3.65 ef | 0.0638 abc | |
D4 | 4.55 c | 7.05 de | 3.40 g | 0.0651 ab | |
D5 | 4.79 ab | 6.92 def | 3.20 h | 0.0664 a | |
均值Mean | 4.25 | 7.16 | 3.61 | 0.0628 | |
N4 | D1 | 4.06 ef | 7.92 a | 4.49 a | 0.0581 ef |
D2 | 4.24 d | 7.84 a | 4.30 b | 0.0600 de | |
D3 | 4.67 bc | 7.67 ab | 4.04 c | 0.0615 cd | |
D4 | 4.71 abc | 7.41 bc | 3.72 e | 0.0625 bcd | |
D5 | 4.87 a | 7.20 cd | 3.45 g | 0.0636 abc | |
均值Mean | 4.51 | 7.61 | 4.00 | 0.0611 | |
方差分析 Variance analysis | N | ** | ** | ** | ** |
D | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
N×D | ns | ** | ** | ns |
施氮量 Nitrogen application rate | 直播密度 Direct-sowing density | 光合势Photosynthetic potential/(×104 m2 d∙hm-2) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
播种-拔节 Sowing-Jointing | 拔节-抽穗 Jointing-Heading | 抽穗-成熟 Heading-Maturity | ||
N1 | D1 | 65.33 m | 72.49 j | 160.10 i |
D2 | 73.59 l | 80.13 i | 180.53 h | |
D3 | 79.16 l | 84.63 hi | 190.07 h | |
D4 | 91.21 k | 90.44 h | 195.38 h | |
D5 | 97.79 j | 91.24 h | 186.76 h | |
均值Mean | 81.42 | 83.79 | 182.57 | |
N2 | D1 | 102.10 j | 113.71 g | 263.46 g |
D2 | 111.21 hi | 121.78 f | 283.25 f | |
D3 | 117.58 gh | 126.77 ef | 294.83 ef | |
D4 | 128.79 de | 130.36 de | 284.87 f | |
D5 | 136.90 bc | 129.73 de | 265.55 g | |
均值Mean | 119.32 | 124.47 | 278.39 | |
N3 | D1 | 110.35 i | 136.64 cd | 308.43 de |
D2 | 117.23 gh | 142.68 bc | 319.91 cd | |
D3 | 124.51 ef | 143.01 bc | 304.34 de | |
D4 | 134.08 cd | 144.94 b | 292.66 ef | |
D5 | 141.17 ab | 146.32 b | 283.47 f | |
均值Mean | 125.47 | 142.72 | 301.76 | |
N4 | D1 | 119.67 fg | 155.70 a | 366.10 a |
D2 | 124.96 ef | 156.99 a | 358.20 ab | |
D3 | 137.91 abc | 160.48 a | 345.49 b | |
D4 | 138.96 abc | 157.56 a | 328.39 c | |
D5 | 143.61 a | 156.89 a | 314.12 cd | |
均值Mean | 133.02 | 157.52 | 342.46 | |
方差分析 Variance analysis | N | ** | ** | ** |
D | ** | ** | ** | |
N×D | ns | ** | ** |
表6 氮密互作对机直播稻光合势的影响
Table 6 Effect of nitrogen-density interaction on photosynthetic potential in mechanical direct-sowing rice.
施氮量 Nitrogen application rate | 直播密度 Direct-sowing density | 光合势Photosynthetic potential/(×104 m2 d∙hm-2) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
播种-拔节 Sowing-Jointing | 拔节-抽穗 Jointing-Heading | 抽穗-成熟 Heading-Maturity | ||
N1 | D1 | 65.33 m | 72.49 j | 160.10 i |
D2 | 73.59 l | 80.13 i | 180.53 h | |
D3 | 79.16 l | 84.63 hi | 190.07 h | |
D4 | 91.21 k | 90.44 h | 195.38 h | |
D5 | 97.79 j | 91.24 h | 186.76 h | |
均值Mean | 81.42 | 83.79 | 182.57 | |
N2 | D1 | 102.10 j | 113.71 g | 263.46 g |
D2 | 111.21 hi | 121.78 f | 283.25 f | |
D3 | 117.58 gh | 126.77 ef | 294.83 ef | |
D4 | 128.79 de | 130.36 de | 284.87 f | |
D5 | 136.90 bc | 129.73 de | 265.55 g | |
均值Mean | 119.32 | 124.47 | 278.39 | |
N3 | D1 | 110.35 i | 136.64 cd | 308.43 de |
D2 | 117.23 gh | 142.68 bc | 319.91 cd | |
D3 | 124.51 ef | 143.01 bc | 304.34 de | |
D4 | 134.08 cd | 144.94 b | 292.66 ef | |
D5 | 141.17 ab | 146.32 b | 283.47 f | |
均值Mean | 125.47 | 142.72 | 301.76 | |
N4 | D1 | 119.67 fg | 155.70 a | 366.10 a |
D2 | 124.96 ef | 156.99 a | 358.20 ab | |
D3 | 137.91 abc | 160.48 a | 345.49 b | |
D4 | 138.96 abc | 157.56 a | 328.39 c | |
D5 | 143.61 a | 156.89 a | 314.12 cd | |
均值Mean | 133.02 | 157.52 | 342.46 | |
方差分析 Variance analysis | N | ** | ** | ** |
D | ** | ** | ** | |
N×D | ns | ** | ** |
施氮量 Nitrogen application rate | 直播密度 Direct-sowing density | 拔节期 Jointing/(t·hm-2) | 抽穗期 Heading/(t·hm-2) | 成熟期 Maturity/(t·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
N1 | D1 | 1.42 m | 7.49 h | 10.40 o |
D2 | 2.37 j | 7.74 gh | 11.38 n | |
D3 | 2.82 i | 7.75 gh | 11.77 mn | |
D4 | 3.25 gh | 7.98 g | 12.30 l | |
D5 | 3.58 f | 8.06 g | 11.96 lm | |
均值Mean | 2.69 | 7.80 | 11.56 | |
N2 | D1 | 1.78 l | 8.85 f | 12.78 k |
D2 | 2.76 i | 8.93 ef | 13.55 ij | |
D3 | 3.35 fg | 9.11 ef | 14.19 g | |
D4 | 3.86 e | 8.98 ef | 13.74 hi | |
D5 | 4.11 d | 8.93 ef | 13.25 j | |
均值Mean | 3.17 | 8.96 | 13.51 | |
N3 | D1 | 2.09 k | 9.66 bc | 15.43 de |
D2 | 3.08 h | 9.77 bc | 15.82 d | |
D3 | 3.83 e | 9.84 bc | 15.39 de | |
D4 | 4.28 cd | 9.64 c | 14.77 f | |
D5 | 4.58 ab | 9.21 de | 13.92 ghi | |
均值Mean | 3.57 | 9.62 | 15.07 | |
N4 | D1 | 2.30 jk | 10.59 a | 17.42 a |
D2 | 3.32 g | 10.54 a | 16.92 b | |
D3 | 4.11 d | 10.48 a | 16.38 c | |
D4 | 4.37 bc | 10.00 b | 15.19 ef | |
D5 | 4.75 a | 9.55 cd | 14.08 gh | |
均值Mean | 3.77 | 10.23 | 16.00 | |
方差分析 Variance analysis | N | ** | ** | ** |
D | ** | * | ** | |
N×D | * | ** | * |
表7 氮密互作对机直播稻干物质量的影响
Table 7 Effect of nitrogen-density interaction on the dry matter weight in mechanical direct-sowing rice.
施氮量 Nitrogen application rate | 直播密度 Direct-sowing density | 拔节期 Jointing/(t·hm-2) | 抽穗期 Heading/(t·hm-2) | 成熟期 Maturity/(t·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
N1 | D1 | 1.42 m | 7.49 h | 10.40 o |
D2 | 2.37 j | 7.74 gh | 11.38 n | |
D3 | 2.82 i | 7.75 gh | 11.77 mn | |
D4 | 3.25 gh | 7.98 g | 12.30 l | |
D5 | 3.58 f | 8.06 g | 11.96 lm | |
均值Mean | 2.69 | 7.80 | 11.56 | |
N2 | D1 | 1.78 l | 8.85 f | 12.78 k |
D2 | 2.76 i | 8.93 ef | 13.55 ij | |
D3 | 3.35 fg | 9.11 ef | 14.19 g | |
D4 | 3.86 e | 8.98 ef | 13.74 hi | |
D5 | 4.11 d | 8.93 ef | 13.25 j | |
均值Mean | 3.17 | 8.96 | 13.51 | |
N3 | D1 | 2.09 k | 9.66 bc | 15.43 de |
D2 | 3.08 h | 9.77 bc | 15.82 d | |
D3 | 3.83 e | 9.84 bc | 15.39 de | |
D4 | 4.28 cd | 9.64 c | 14.77 f | |
D5 | 4.58 ab | 9.21 de | 13.92 ghi | |
均值Mean | 3.57 | 9.62 | 15.07 | |
N4 | D1 | 2.30 jk | 10.59 a | 17.42 a |
D2 | 3.32 g | 10.54 a | 16.92 b | |
D3 | 4.11 d | 10.48 a | 16.38 c | |
D4 | 4.37 bc | 10.00 b | 15.19 ef | |
D5 | 4.75 a | 9.55 cd | 14.08 gh | |
均值Mean | 3.77 | 10.23 | 16.00 | |
方差分析 Variance analysis | N | ** | ** | ** |
D | ** | * | ** | |
N×D | * | ** | * |
施氮量 Nitrogen application rate | 直播密度 Direct-sowing density | 播种-拔节Sowing-Jointing | 拔节-抽穗Jointing-Heading | 抽穗-成熟Heading-Maturity | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
物质积累量 Dry matter accumulation /(t·hm-2) | 比例 Ratio/% /% | 物质积累量 Dry matter accumulation /(t·hm-2) | 比例 Ratio/% /% | 物质积累量 Dry matter accumulation /(t·hm-2) | 比例 Ratio/% /% | ||||
N1 | D1 | 1.42 m | 13.61 | 6.07 fgh | 58.35 | 2.92 k | 28.04 | ||
D2 | 2.37 j | 20.85 | 5.36 ij | 47.15 | 3.64 j | 32.00 | |||
D3 | 2.82 i | 23.97 | 4.93 jkl | 41.85 | 4.02 ij | 34.18 | |||
D4 | 3.25 gh | 26.44 | 4.73 kl | 38.43 | 4.32 hi | 35.13 | |||
D5 | 3.58 f | 29.88 | 4.49 l | 37.50 | 3.90 ij | 32.62 | |||
均值Mean | 2.69 | 22.95 | 5.11 | 44.66 | 3.76 | 32.39 | |||
N2 | D1 | 1.78 l | 13.89 | 7.07 cd | 55.32 | 3.94 ij | 30.79 | ||
D2 | 2.76 i | 20.37 | 6.17 fg | 45.49 | 4.63 gh | 34.13 | |||
D3 | 3.35 fg | 23.63 | 5.76 ghi | 40.55 | 5.08 efg | 35.82 | |||
D4 | 3.86 e | 28.07 | 5.12 jk | 37.25 | 4.77 fgh | 34.68 | |||
D5 | 4.11 d | 31.01 | 4.82 kl | 36.37 | 4.32 hi | 32.62 | |||
均值Mean | 3.17 | 23.40 | 5.79 | 43.00 | 4.55 | 33.61 | |||
N3 | D1 | 2.09 k | 13.52 | 7.57 b | 49.06 | 5.77 cd | 37.42 | ||
D2 | 3.08 h | 19.49 | 6.69 de | 42.29 | 6.04 bc | 38.22 | |||
D3 | 3.83 e | 24.88 | 6.01 fgh | 39.04 | 5.55 de | 36.08 | |||
D4 | 4.28 cd | 28.96 | 5.36 ij | 36.28 | 5.14 ef | 34.76 | |||
D5 | 4.58 ab | 32.90 | 4.63 kl | 33.28 | 4.71 fgh | 33.82 | |||
均值Mean | 3.57 | 23.95 | 6.05 | 39.99 | 5.44 | 36.06 | |||
N4 | D1 | 2.30 jk | 13.21 | 8.29 a | 47.60 | 6.83 a | 39.19 | ||
D2 | 3.32 g | 19.61 | 7.22 bc | 42.68 | 6.38 ab | 37.71 | |||
D3 | 4.11 d | 25.12 | 6.36 ef | 38.85 | 5.90 bcd | 36.03 | |||
D4 | 4.37 bc | 28.77 | 5.63 hi | 37.10 | 5.18 ef | 34.13 | |||
D5 | 4.75 a | 33.73 | 4.80 kl | 34.07 | 4.53 h | 32.20 | |||
均值Mean | 3.77 | 24.09 | 6.46 | 40.06 | 5.77 | 35.85 | |||
方差分析 Variance analysis | N | ** | - | ** | - | ** | - | ||
D | ** | - | ** | - | ** | - | |||
N×D | * | - | ** | - | ** | - |
表8 氮密互作对机直播稻不同阶段干物质积累量及其比例的影响
Table 8 Effect of nitrogen-density interaction on the dry matter accumulation and its rate at different growth periods in mechanical direct-sowing rice.
施氮量 Nitrogen application rate | 直播密度 Direct-sowing density | 播种-拔节Sowing-Jointing | 拔节-抽穗Jointing-Heading | 抽穗-成熟Heading-Maturity | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
物质积累量 Dry matter accumulation /(t·hm-2) | 比例 Ratio/% /% | 物质积累量 Dry matter accumulation /(t·hm-2) | 比例 Ratio/% /% | 物质积累量 Dry matter accumulation /(t·hm-2) | 比例 Ratio/% /% | ||||
N1 | D1 | 1.42 m | 13.61 | 6.07 fgh | 58.35 | 2.92 k | 28.04 | ||
D2 | 2.37 j | 20.85 | 5.36 ij | 47.15 | 3.64 j | 32.00 | |||
D3 | 2.82 i | 23.97 | 4.93 jkl | 41.85 | 4.02 ij | 34.18 | |||
D4 | 3.25 gh | 26.44 | 4.73 kl | 38.43 | 4.32 hi | 35.13 | |||
D5 | 3.58 f | 29.88 | 4.49 l | 37.50 | 3.90 ij | 32.62 | |||
均值Mean | 2.69 | 22.95 | 5.11 | 44.66 | 3.76 | 32.39 | |||
N2 | D1 | 1.78 l | 13.89 | 7.07 cd | 55.32 | 3.94 ij | 30.79 | ||
D2 | 2.76 i | 20.37 | 6.17 fg | 45.49 | 4.63 gh | 34.13 | |||
D3 | 3.35 fg | 23.63 | 5.76 ghi | 40.55 | 5.08 efg | 35.82 | |||
D4 | 3.86 e | 28.07 | 5.12 jk | 37.25 | 4.77 fgh | 34.68 | |||
D5 | 4.11 d | 31.01 | 4.82 kl | 36.37 | 4.32 hi | 32.62 | |||
均值Mean | 3.17 | 23.40 | 5.79 | 43.00 | 4.55 | 33.61 | |||
N3 | D1 | 2.09 k | 13.52 | 7.57 b | 49.06 | 5.77 cd | 37.42 | ||
D2 | 3.08 h | 19.49 | 6.69 de | 42.29 | 6.04 bc | 38.22 | |||
D3 | 3.83 e | 24.88 | 6.01 fgh | 39.04 | 5.55 de | 36.08 | |||
D4 | 4.28 cd | 28.96 | 5.36 ij | 36.28 | 5.14 ef | 34.76 | |||
D5 | 4.58 ab | 32.90 | 4.63 kl | 33.28 | 4.71 fgh | 33.82 | |||
均值Mean | 3.57 | 23.95 | 6.05 | 39.99 | 5.44 | 36.06 | |||
N4 | D1 | 2.30 jk | 13.21 | 8.29 a | 47.60 | 6.83 a | 39.19 | ||
D2 | 3.32 g | 19.61 | 7.22 bc | 42.68 | 6.38 ab | 37.71 | |||
D3 | 4.11 d | 25.12 | 6.36 ef | 38.85 | 5.90 bcd | 36.03 | |||
D4 | 4.37 bc | 28.77 | 5.63 hi | 37.10 | 5.18 ef | 34.13 | |||
D5 | 4.75 a | 33.73 | 4.80 kl | 34.07 | 4.53 h | 32.20 | |||
均值Mean | 3.77 | 24.09 | 6.46 | 40.06 | 5.77 | 35.85 | |||
方差分析 Variance analysis | N | ** | - | ** | - | ** | - | ||
D | ** | - | ** | - | ** | - | |||
N×D | * | - | ** | - | ** | - |
施氮量 Nitrogen application rate | 直播密度 Direct-sowing density | 群体生长率 Crop growth rate/ (g·m-2 d-1) | 净同化率 Net assimilation rate/ (g·m-2 d-1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
播种-拔节 Sowing-Jointing | 拔节-抽穗 Jointing-Heading | 抽穗-成熟 Heading-Maturity | 播种-拔节 Sowing-Jointing | 拔节-抽穗 Jointing-Heading | 抽穗-成熟 Heading-Maturity | |||
N1 | D1 | 2.40 m | 27.60 b | 5.40 k | 0.86 k | 8.70 a | 1.98 c | |
D2 | 4.02 j | 24.38 d | 6.74 j | 1.47 h | 6.93 b | 2.16 b | ||
D3 | 4.78 i | 22.39 ef | 7.45 ij | 1.76 fg | 6.01 d | 2.26 ab | ||
D4 | 5.51 gh | 21.48 f | 8.00 fghi | 2.01 e | 5.34 efg | 2.36 a | ||
D5 | 6.06 f | 20.39 fg | 7.23 ij | 2.19 d | 4.98 ghi | 2.24 ab | ||
均值Mean | 4.55 | 23.25 | 6.96 | 1.66 | 6.39 | 2.20 | ||
N2 | D1 | 3.01 l | 30.75 a | 7.16 ij | 1.08 j | 6.42 c | 1.56 ij | |
D2 | 4.68 i | 26.81 bc | 8.41 efgh | 1.65 g | 5.21 fgh | 1.69 ghi | ||
D3 | 5.68 fg | 25.02 cd | 9.24 de | 1.97 e | 4.66 ij | 1.78 defgh | ||
D4 | 6.54 e | 22.26 ef | 8.67 efg | 2.21 d | 4.00 kl | 1.74 fgh | ||
D5 | 6.96 d | 20.95 f | 7.86 ghi | 2.3 cd | 3.75 l | 1.71 ghi | ||
均值Mean | 5.38 | 25.16 | 8.27 | 1.84 | 4.81 | 1.70 | ||
N3 | D1 | 3.54 k | 30.28 a | 10.31 bc | 1.25 i | 5.74 de | 1.93 cde | |
D2 | 5.22 h | 26.75 bc | 10.79 ab | 1.81 f | 4.84 hi | 1.95 cd | ||
D3 | 6.49 e | 24.03 de | 9.92 cd | 2.21 d | 4.30 jk | 1.89 cdef | ||
D4 | 7.25 cd | 21.44 f | 9.17 de | 2.42 bc | 3.76 l | 1.83 cdefg | ||
D5 | 7.76 ab | 18.53 g | 8.40 efgh | 2.54 ab | 3.20 m | 1.74 fgh | ||
均值Mean | 6.05 | 24.21 | 9.72 | 2.05 | 4.37 | 1.87 | ||
N4 | D1 | 3.90 jk | 31.90 a | 11.57 a | 1.35 hi | 5.52 ef | 1.91 cdef | |
D2 | 5.62 gh | 27.77 b | 10.81 ab | 1.92 ef | 4.74 i | 1.83 cdefg | ||
D3 | 6.97 d | 24.48 d | 10.00 bcd | 2.30 cd | 4.05 kl | 1.77 efgh | ||
D4 | 7.40 bc | 21.67 f | 8.78 ef | 2.44 bc | 3.64 l | 1.64 hij | ||
D5 | 8.05 a | 18.45 g | 7.68 hi | 2.62 a | 3.10 m | 1.51 j | ||
均值Mean | 6.39 | 24.85 | 9.77 | 2.12 | 4.21 | 1.73 | ||
方差分析 Variance analysis | N | ** | * | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
D | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ||
N×D | * | ** | ** | ns | ** | ** |
表9 氮密互作对机直播稻不同阶段群体生长率和净同化率的影响
Table 9 Effect of nitrogen-density interaction on the crop growth rate and net assimilation rate at different growth periods in mechanical direct-sowing rice.
施氮量 Nitrogen application rate | 直播密度 Direct-sowing density | 群体生长率 Crop growth rate/ (g·m-2 d-1) | 净同化率 Net assimilation rate/ (g·m-2 d-1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
播种-拔节 Sowing-Jointing | 拔节-抽穗 Jointing-Heading | 抽穗-成熟 Heading-Maturity | 播种-拔节 Sowing-Jointing | 拔节-抽穗 Jointing-Heading | 抽穗-成熟 Heading-Maturity | |||
N1 | D1 | 2.40 m | 27.60 b | 5.40 k | 0.86 k | 8.70 a | 1.98 c | |
D2 | 4.02 j | 24.38 d | 6.74 j | 1.47 h | 6.93 b | 2.16 b | ||
D3 | 4.78 i | 22.39 ef | 7.45 ij | 1.76 fg | 6.01 d | 2.26 ab | ||
D4 | 5.51 gh | 21.48 f | 8.00 fghi | 2.01 e | 5.34 efg | 2.36 a | ||
D5 | 6.06 f | 20.39 fg | 7.23 ij | 2.19 d | 4.98 ghi | 2.24 ab | ||
均值Mean | 4.55 | 23.25 | 6.96 | 1.66 | 6.39 | 2.20 | ||
N2 | D1 | 3.01 l | 30.75 a | 7.16 ij | 1.08 j | 6.42 c | 1.56 ij | |
D2 | 4.68 i | 26.81 bc | 8.41 efgh | 1.65 g | 5.21 fgh | 1.69 ghi | ||
D3 | 5.68 fg | 25.02 cd | 9.24 de | 1.97 e | 4.66 ij | 1.78 defgh | ||
D4 | 6.54 e | 22.26 ef | 8.67 efg | 2.21 d | 4.00 kl | 1.74 fgh | ||
D5 | 6.96 d | 20.95 f | 7.86 ghi | 2.3 cd | 3.75 l | 1.71 ghi | ||
均值Mean | 5.38 | 25.16 | 8.27 | 1.84 | 4.81 | 1.70 | ||
N3 | D1 | 3.54 k | 30.28 a | 10.31 bc | 1.25 i | 5.74 de | 1.93 cde | |
D2 | 5.22 h | 26.75 bc | 10.79 ab | 1.81 f | 4.84 hi | 1.95 cd | ||
D3 | 6.49 e | 24.03 de | 9.92 cd | 2.21 d | 4.30 jk | 1.89 cdef | ||
D4 | 7.25 cd | 21.44 f | 9.17 de | 2.42 bc | 3.76 l | 1.83 cdefg | ||
D5 | 7.76 ab | 18.53 g | 8.40 efgh | 2.54 ab | 3.20 m | 1.74 fgh | ||
均值Mean | 6.05 | 24.21 | 9.72 | 2.05 | 4.37 | 1.87 | ||
N4 | D1 | 3.90 jk | 31.90 a | 11.57 a | 1.35 hi | 5.52 ef | 1.91 cdef | |
D2 | 5.62 gh | 27.77 b | 10.81 ab | 1.92 ef | 4.74 i | 1.83 cdefg | ||
D3 | 6.97 d | 24.48 d | 10.00 bcd | 2.30 cd | 4.05 kl | 1.77 efgh | ||
D4 | 7.40 bc | 21.67 f | 8.78 ef | 2.44 bc | 3.64 l | 1.64 hij | ||
D5 | 8.05 a | 18.45 g | 7.68 hi | 2.62 a | 3.10 m | 1.51 j | ||
均值Mean | 6.39 | 24.85 | 9.77 | 2.12 | 4.21 | 1.73 | ||
方差分析 Variance analysis | N | ** | * | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
D | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ||
N×D | * | ** | ** | ns | ** | ** |
[1] | 杨建昌, 杜永, 吴长付, 刘立军, 王志琴, 朱庆森. 超高产粳型水稻生长发育特性的研究. 中国农业科学, 2006, 39(7): 1336-1345. |
Yang J C, Du Y, Wu C F, Liu L J, Wang Z Q, Zhu Q S.Growth and development characteristics of super- high-yielding mid-season japonica rice.Sci Agric Sin, 2006, 39(7): 1336-1345. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 卢百关, 秦德荣, 樊继伟, 方兆伟, 李健, 刘辉, 迟铭, 徐大勇. 江苏省直播稻生产现状、趋势及存在问题探讨. 中国稻米, 2009(2): 45-47. |
Lu B G, Qin D R, Fan J W, Fang Z W, Li J, Liu H, Chi M, Xu D Y.Present situation, tendency and problems of direct seeding rice production in Jiangsu Province.China Rice, 2009(2): 45-47. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 金千瑜, 欧阳由男, 陆永良, 徐一成. 我国南方直播稻若干问题及其技术对策研究. 中国农学通报, 2001, 17(5): 44-48. |
Jin Q Y, Ou-Yang Y N, Lu Y L, Xu Y C. Some problems and technical measures of direct seeding rice in South China.Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2001, 17(5): 44-48. (in Chinese) | |
[4] | 张洪程. 直播稻种植科学问题研究. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2009: 1-15. |
Zhang H C.Study of Scientific Problems in Direct-Seeding Rice Cultivation. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2009: 1-15. (in Chinese) | |
[5] | 吴文革, 陈烨, 钱银飞, 王小军, 吴一梅. 水稻直播栽培的发展概况与研究进展. 中国农业科技导报, 2006, 8(4): 32-36. |
Wu W G, Chen Y, Qian Y F, Wang X J, Wu Y M.The current status and progresses of the research on direct seeding rice.Rev Chin Agric Sci Technol, 2006, 8(4): 32-36. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 何喜玲, 王俊. 水稻机械直播技术综述. 中国农机化, 2003(1): 23-25. |
He X L, Wang J.The technique of paddy direct seeding.Chin Agric Mech, 2003(1): 23-25. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 胡小荡, 胡雅杰. 水稻轻简栽培研究进展. 杂交水稻, 2013, 28(5): 1-5. |
Hu X D, Hu Y J.Research progress on simplified cultivation technology for rice.Hybrid Rice, 2013, 28(5): 1-5. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | Liu H Y, Hussain S, Zheng M M, Peng S B, Huang J L, Cui K H, Nie L X.Dry direct-seeded rice as an alternative to transplanted-flooded rice in Central China.Agron Sustain Dev, 2015, 35(1): 285-294. |
[9] | 郭九信, 孔亚丽, 谢凯柳, 李东海, 冯绪猛, 凌宁, 王敏, 郭世伟. 养分管理对直播稻产量和氮肥利用率的影响. 作物学报, 2016, 42(7): 1016-1025. |
Guo J X, Kong Y L, Xie K L, Li D H, Feng X M, Ling N, Wang M, Guo S W.Effects of nutrient management on yield and nitrogen use efficiency of direct seeding rice.Acta Agron Sin, 2016, 42(7): 1016-1025. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 陈海飞, 冯洋, 蔡红梅, 徐芳森, 周卫, 刘芳, 庞再明, 李登荣. 氮肥与移栽密度互作对低产田水稻群体结构及产量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(6): 1319-1328. |
Chen H F, Feng Y, Cai H M, Xu F S, Zhou W, Liu F, Pang Z M, Li D R.Effect of the interaction of nitrogen and transplanting density on the rice population structure and grain yield in low-yield paddy fields.Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2014, 20(6): 1319-1328. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 陈露, 张伟杨, 王志琴, 张耗, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 施氮量对江苏不同年代中粳稻品种产量与群体质量的影响. 作物学报, 2014, 40(8): 1412-1423. |
Chen L, Zhang W Y, Wang Z Q, Zhang H, Liu L J, Yang J C.Effects of nitrogen application rate on grain yield and population quality of mid-season japonica rice cultivars at different decades in Jiangsu Province.Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40(8): 1412-1423. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 张祖建, 谢成林, 谢仁康, 郎有忠, 杨岚, 张菊芳, 朱庆森. 苏中地区直播稻的群体生产力及氮肥运筹的效应. 作物学报, 2011, 37(4): 677-685. |
Zhang Z J, Xie C L, Xie R K, Lang Y Z, Yang L, Zhang J F, Zhu Q S.Population production capacity of direct-seeding rice in Central Jiangsu Region and effects of nitrogen application.Acta Agron Sin, 2011, 37(4): 677-685. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | Hassan G, Qureshi M, Shah N H, Awan I.Performance of six rice cultivars under direct wet seeded conditions of Dera Ismail Khan.Pak J Biol Sci, 1999, 2(4): 1504-1506. |
[14] | 霍中洋, 姚义, 张洪程, 夏炎, 倪晓诚, 戴其根, 许轲, 魏海燕. 播期对直播稻光合物质生产特征的影响. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(13): 2592-2606. |
Huo Z Y, Yao Y, Zhang H C, Xia Y, Ni X C, Dai Q G, Xu K, Wei H Y.Effect of sowing date on characteristics of photosynthesis and matter production of direct seeding rice.Sci Agric Sin, 2012, 45(13): 2592-2606. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 曾山, 黄忠林, 王在满, 罗锡文, 唐湘如. 不同密度对精量穴直播稻产量的影响. 华中农业大学学报, 2014, 33(3): 12-18. |
Zeng S, Huang Z L, Wang Z M, Luo X W, Tang X R.Effects of different planting density on grain yield of precision hill-drop drilling rice.J Huazhong Agric Univ, 2014, 33(3): 12-18. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | Suriyakup P, Polthanee A, Pannangpetch K, Katawatin R, Jean-Claude M.Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) residue and nitrogen rate affected growth and yield of direct seeded rice(Oryza sativa L.) in rainfed riceland. Asian J Plant Sci, 2007, 1(1): 25-29. |
[17] | 范平珊, 罗昊文, 段美洋, 黄穗华, 孔雷蕾, 钟卓君, 莫钊文, 潘圣刚. 浅水灌溉对直播稻秧苗形态特征和生理特性的影响. 华北农学报, 2017, 32(5): 185-191. |
Fan P S, Luo H W, Duan M Y, Hang S H, Kong L L, Zhong Z J, Mo Z W, Pan S G.Effects of shallow water irrigation on morphological and physiological characteristics of direct Seeding rice seedling.Acta Agric Boreali-Sin, 2017, 32(5): 185-191. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 张洪程, 吴桂成, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 高辉, 魏海燕, 端木银熙, 孙菊英, 赵品恒, 沙安勤, 周有炎, 李德剑, 肖跃成, 王宝金, 吴爱国. 粳型杂交水稻超高产形成规律与栽培途径的探讨. 杂交水稻, 2010, 25(Suppl1): 346-353. |
Zhang H C, Wu G C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Gao H, Wei H Y, Duan-Mu Y X, Sun J Y, Zhao P H, Shao A Q, Zhou Y Y, Li D J, Xiao Y C, Wang B J, Wu A G. Formulation of and cultural approach to super-high yielding in japonica hybrid rice. Hybrid Rice, 2010, 25(Suppl1): 346-353. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 吴桂成, 张洪程, 钱银飞, 李德剑, 周有炎, 徐军, 吴文革, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 高辉, 徐宗进, 钱宗华, 孙菊英, 赵品恒. 粳型超级稻产量构成因素协同规律及超高产特征的研究. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(2): 266-276. |
Wu G C, Zhang H C, Qian Y F, Li D J, Zhou Y Y, Xu J, Wu W G, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Gao H, Xu Z J, Qian Z H, Sun J Y, Zhao P H.Rule of grain yield components from high yield to super high yield and the characters of super-high yielding Japonica super rice. Sci Agric Sin, 2010, 43(2): 266-276. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 郭保卫, 胡雅杰, 钱海军, 曹伟伟, 邢志鹏, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕. 秸秆还田下适宜施氮量提高机插稻南粳9108产量和群体质量. 中国水稻科学, 2015, 29(5): 511-518. |
Guo B W, Hu Y J, Qian H J, Cao W W, Xing Z P, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y.Optimal nitrogen rate improves grain yield and population quality of mechanical transplanted rice Nanjing 9108 under straw manuring.Chin J Rice Sci, 2015, 29(5): 511-518. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 魏海燕, 王亚江, 孟天瑶, 葛梦婕, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲. 机插超级粳稻产量、品质及氮肥利用率对氮肥的响应. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(2): 488-496. |
Wei H Y, Wang Y J, Meng T Y, Ge M J, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K.Response of yield, quality and nitrogen use efficiency to nitrogen fertilizer from mechanical transplanting super japonica rice.Chin J Appl Ecol, 2014, 25(2): 488-496. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 赵黎明, 李明, 郑殿峰, 顾春梅, 那永光, 解保胜. 灌溉方式与种植密度对寒地水稻产量及光合物质生产特性的影响. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(6): 159-169. |
Zhao L M, Li M, Zheng D F, Gu C M, Na Y G, Xie B S.Effects of irrigation methods and rice planting densities on yield and photosynthetic characteristics of matter production in cold area.Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng, 2015, 31(6): 159-169. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 邓中华, 明日, 李小坤, 郑磊, 徐维明, 杨运清, 任涛, 丛日环, 鲁剑巍. 不同密度和氮肥用量对水稻产量、构成因子及氮肥利用率的影响. 土壤, 2015, 47(1): 20-25. |
Deng Z H, Ming R, Li X K, Zheng L, Xu W M, Yang Y Q, Ren T, Cong R H, Lu J W.Effects of nitrogen application rate and planting density on grain yields, yield components and nitrogen use efficiencies of rice.Soil, 2015, 47(1): 20-25. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 苏祖芳, 霍中洋. 水稻合理密植研究进展. 耕作与栽培, 2006(5): 6-9. |
Su Z F, Huo Z Y.Progress for research in rational close planting in rice.Cult Plant, 2006(5): 6-9. (in Chinese) | |
[25] | 林洪鑫, 潘晓华, 石庆华, 彭春瑞, 吴建富. 施氮量与栽插密度对超级早稻中早22产量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011, 17(1): 22-28. |
Lin H X, Pan X H, Shi Q H, Peng C R, Wu J F.Effects of nitrogen fertilization and planting density on yield of super early rice Zhongzao 22.Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2011, 17(1): 22-28. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | 周江明, 赵琳, 董越勇, 徐进, 边武英, 毛杨仓, 章秀福. 氮肥和栽植密度对水稻产量及氮肥利用率的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16(2): 274-281. |
Zhou J M, Zhao L, Dong Y Y, Xu J, Bian W Y, Mao Y C, Zhang X F.Nitrogen and transplanting density interactions on the rice yield and N use rate. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2010, 16(2): 274-281. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | 苏祖芳, 郭宏文, 李永丰, 张洪程, 张海泉. 水稻群体叶面积动态类型的研究. 中国农业科学, 1994(4): 23-30. |
Su Z F, Guo H W, Li Y F, Zhang H C, Zhang H Q.Study on dynamic types of leaf area in rice population.Sci Agric Sin, 1994(4): 23-30. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | 程建平, 赵锋, 曾山, 陈旭阳, 王乐云, 吴金元, 徐双前, 游爱兵, 张旅峰. 机械旱直播直播密度对水稻群体光合和产量形成的影响. 湖北农业科学, 2012, 51(23): 5275-5278. |
Cheng J P, Zhao F, Zeng S, Chen X Y, Wang L Y, Wu J Y, Xu S Q, You A B, Zhang L F.Effect of mechanical dry direct sowing seeding density on photosynthesis and yield formation of rice population.Hubei Agric Sci, 2012, 51(23): 5275-5278. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[29] | 龙文飞, 傅志强, 钟娟, 苏姗, 李康丽. 节水灌溉条件下氮密互作对双季晚稻丰源优299物质生产特性的影响. 华北农学报, 2017, 32(2): 185-193. |
Long W F, Fu Z Q, Zhong J, Su S, Li K L.Effects of nitrogen application and planting density on late rice Fengyuanyou 299 material production characteristics under the condition of water saving irrigation.Acta Agric Boreali-Sin, 2017, 32(2): 185-193. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[30] | 邓安凤, 杨从党, 陈清华, 施云, 陈跃楷, 李丛英, 徐世林, 毛桂祥, 李贵勇, 夏琼梅, 朱海平. 不同施肥方式对不同密度下直播稻的产量及群体光合物质生产的影响. 中国稻米, 2017, 23(4): 123-129. |
Deng A F, Yang C D, Chen Q H, Shi Y, Chen Y K, Li C Y, Xu S L, Mao G X, Li G Y, Xia Q M, Zhu H P.Effects of different fertilization methods on yield and photosynthetic material production of direct seeding rice at different densities.China Rice, 2017, 23(4): 123-129. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[31] | 朱聪聪, 张洪程, 郭保卫, 曹利强, 江峰, 葛梦婕, 花劲, 宋云生, 周兴涛, 霍中洋, 许轲, 戴其根, 魏海燕, 朱大伟. 钵苗机插密度对不同类型水稻产量及光合物质生产特性的影响. 作物学报, 2014, 40(1): 122-133. |
Zhu C C, Zhang H C, Guo B W, Cao L Q, Jiang F, Ge M J, Hua J, Song Y S, Zhou X T, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Dai Q G, Wei H Y, Zhu D W.Effect of planting density on yield and photosynthate production characteristics in different types of rice with bowl mechanical-transplanting method.Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40(1): 122-133. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[32] | 龙旭, 汪仁全, 孙永健, 马均. 不同施氮量下三角形强化栽培水稻群体发育与产量形成特征. 中国水稻科学, 2010, 24(2): 162-168. |
Long X, Wang R Q, Sun Y J, Ma J.Characteristics of population development and yield formation of rice under triangle-planted system of rice intensification at different nitrogen application amounts.Chin J Rice Sci, 2010, 24(2): 162-168. | |
[33] | 凌启鸿. 作物群体质量. 上海: 上海科学出版社, 2000: 42-216. |
Ling Q H. Crop Population Quality.Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Press, 2000: 42-216. (in Chinese) | |
[34] | 邹应斌, 黄见良, 屠乃美, 李合松, 黄升平, 张杨珠. “旺壮重”栽培对双季杂交稻产量形成及生理特性的影响. 作物学报, 2001, 27(3): 343-350. |
Zou Y B, Huang J L, Tu N M, Li H S, Huang S P, Zhang Y Z.Effects of the VSW cultural method on yield formation and physiological characteristics in double cropping hybrid rice.Acta Agron Sin, 2001, 27(3): 343-350. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[35] | 胡雅杰, 邢志鹏, 龚金龙, 刘国涛, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 郭保卫, 沙安勤, 周有炎, 罗学超, 刘国林. 钵苗机插水稻群体动态特征及高产形成机制的探讨. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(5): 865-879. |
Hu Y J, Xing Z P, Gong J L, Liu G T, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Guo B W, Sha A Q, Zhou Y Y, Luo X C, Liu G L.Study on population characteristics and formation mechanisms for high yield of pot-seedling mechanical transplanting rice.Sci Agric Sin, 2014, 47(5): 865-879. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 郭展, 张运波. 水稻对干旱胁迫的生理生化响应及分子调控研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 335-349. |
[2] | 韦还和, 马唯一, 左博源, 汪璐璐, 朱旺, 耿孝宇, 张翔, 孟天瑶, 陈英龙, 高平磊, 许轲, 霍中洋, 戴其根. 盐、干旱及其复合胁迫对水稻产量和品质形成影响的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 350-363. |
[3] | 许丹洁, 林巧霞, 李正康, 庄小倩, 凌宇, 赖美玲, 陈晓婷, 鲁国东. OsOPR10正调控水稻对稻瘟病和白叶枯病的抗性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 364-374. |
[4] | 候小琴, 王莹, 余贝, 符卫蒙, 奉保华, 沈煜潮, 谢杭军, 王焕然, 许用强, 武志海, 王建军, 陶龙兴, 符冠富. 黄腐酸钾提高水稻秧苗耐盐性的作用途径分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 409-421. |
[5] | 吕宙, 易秉怀, 陈平平, 周文新, 唐文帮, 易镇邪. 施氮量与移栽密度对小粒型杂交水稻产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 422-436. |
[6] | 胡继杰, 胡志华, 张均华, 曹小闯, 金千瑜, 章志远, 朱练峰. 根际饱和溶解氧对水稻分蘖期光合及生长特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 437-446. |
[7] | 刘福祥, 甄浩洋, 彭焕, 郑刘春, 彭德良, 文艳华. 广东省水稻孢囊线虫病调查与鉴定[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 456-461. |
[8] | 陈浩田, 秦缘, 钟笑涵, 林晨语, 秦竞航, 杨建昌, 张伟杨. 水稻根系和土壤性状与稻田甲烷排放关系的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 233-245. |
[9] | 缪军, 冉金晖, 徐梦彬, 卜柳冰, 王平, 梁国华, 周勇. 过量表达异三聚体G蛋白γ亚基基因RGG2提高水稻抗旱性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 246-255. |
[10] | 尹潇潇, 张芷菡, 颜绣莲, 廖蓉, 杨思葭, 郭岱铭, 樊晶, 赵志学, 王文明. 多个稻曲病菌效应因子的信号肽验证和表达分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 256-265. |
[11] | 朱裕敬, 桂金鑫, 龚成云, 罗新阳, 石居斌, 张海清, 贺记外. 全基因组关联分析定位水稻分蘖角度QTL[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 266-276. |
[12] | 赵艺婷, 谢可冉, 高逖, 崔克辉. 水稻分蘖期干旱锻炼对幼穗分化期高温下穗发育和产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 277-289. |
[13] | 魏倩倩, 汪玉磊, 孔海民, 徐青山, 颜玉莲, 潘林, 迟春欣, 孔亚丽, 田文昊, 朱练峰, 曹小闯, 张均华, 朱春权. 信号分子硫化氢参与硫肥缓解铝对水稻生长抑制作用的机制[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 290-302. |
[14] | 周甜, 吴少华, 康建宏, 吴宏亮, 杨生龙, 王星强, 李昱, 黄玉峰. 不同种植模式对水稻籽粒淀粉含量及淀粉关键酶活性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 303-315. |
[15] | 关雅琪, 鄂志国, 王磊, 申红芳. 影响中国水稻生产环节外包发展因素的实证研究:基于群体效应视角[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 324-334. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||