中国水稻科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 68-74.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2019.8022
冯活仪1, 江浩林1, 王孟1, 唐湘如1,2,3, 段美洋1,2,3, 潘圣刚1,2,3, 田华1,2,3, 王树丽1,2,3, 莫钊文1,2,3,*()
收稿日期:
2018-03-08
修回日期:
2018-05-06
出版日期:
2019-01-10
发布日期:
2019-01-10
通讯作者:
莫钊文
基金资助:
Huoyi FENG1, Haolin JIANG1, Meng WANG1, Xiangru TANG1,2,3, Meiyang DUAN1,2,3, Shenggang PAN1,2,3, Hua TIAN1,2,3, Shuli WANG1,2,3, Zhaowen MO1,2,3,*()
Received:
2018-03-08
Revised:
2018-05-06
Online:
2019-01-10
Published:
2019-01-10
Contact:
Zhaowen MO
摘要:
【目的】本研究旨在分析不同香稻品种苗期耐高温的形态生理响应特征,筛选出耐热性较好的香稻品种。【方法】在盆栽条件下,于光照培养箱内,以超级常规香稻玉香油占为对照,研究了常规香稻品种巴斯马蒂、桂香占、农香18、湘晚籼13、象牙香占、中香1号、美香占2号在苗期高温处理下的形态生理响应特征。于高温处理前后测定了8个香稻品种苗期各项形态生理指标。【结果】与玉香油占相比,高温胁迫下,巴斯马蒂的株高、单株鲜质量、单株干质量增幅更大,成活率和过氧化物酶活性更高,丙二醛含量反而下降了33.39%,表明巴斯马蒂的耐高温胁迫能力较好。湘晚籼13在高温处理下的单株干质量增幅与玉香油占相近,株成活率较玉香油占低,胞间二氧化碳浓度变幅较小,SOD活性和丙二醛含量的变幅在8个品种中均为最低,说明其耐高温胁迫的能力略低于玉香油占。农香18、象牙香占和美香占2号的成活率分别为13.33%、12.67%和16.00%。桂香占(4.33%)、中香1号(1.33%)在高温处理后的成活率最低,表明两者的耐高温能力均较差。【结论】8个品种耐热性从强到弱依次为巴斯马蒂、玉香油占、湘晚籼13、农香18、象牙香占、美香占2号、桂香占和中香1号。
中图分类号:
冯活仪, 江浩林, 王孟, 唐湘如, 段美洋, 潘圣刚, 田华, 王树丽, 莫钊文. 不同香稻品种苗期耐高温的形态生理响应[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(1): 68-74.
Huoyi FENG, Haolin JIANG, Meng WANG, Xiangru TANG, Meiyang DUAN, Shenggang PAN, Hua TIAN, Shuli WANG, Zhaowen MO. Morphophysiological Responses of Different Scented Rice Varieties to High Temperature at Seedling Stage[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2019, 33(1): 68-74.
品种 Variety | 株高 Plant height | 单株鲜质量 Fresh weight per plant | 单株干质量 Dry weight per plant | 株成活率 Survival rate/% | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理前 Before treatment /cm | 处理后 After treatment /cm | 变化率 Change rate/% | 处理前 Before treatment /mg | 处理后 After treatment /mg | 变化率 Change rate/% | 处理前 Before treatment /mg | 处理后 After treatment /mg | 变化率 Change rate/% | ||||
玉香油占 Yuxiangyouzhan | 16.94±0.04 c | 18.09±0.03 f | 6.79 | 36.27±1.25 b | 45.81±4.31 b | 26.30 | 5.64±0.13 b | 8.64±0.54 b | 53.19 | 36.67±27.24 ab | ||
巴斯马蒂 Basmati | 17.82±0.27 b | 23.13±0.03 a | 29.80 | 37.97±2.11 b | 57.78±2.24 a | 52.17 | 5.56±0.19 b | 9.69±0.22 a | 74.28 | 37.33±6.01 a | ||
桂香占 Guixiangzhan | 19.57±0.10 a | 21.58±0.09 c | 10.27 | 42.91±1.54 a | 22.97±0.69 d | –46.47 | 6.37±0.22 a | 7.54±0.20 de | 18.37 | 4.33±1.20 bc | ||
农香18 Nongxiang 18 | 15.65±0.19 d | 20.25±0.09 d | 29.39 | 35.55±1.03 b | 26.47±1.07 d | –25.54 | 5.43±0.16 b | 7.68±0.19 cd | 41.44 | 13.33±3.18 abc | ||
湘晚籼13 Xiangwanxian 13 | 17.86±0.06 b | 22.28±0.03 b | 24.75 | 37.43±0.93 b | 45.17±1.36 b | 20.68 | 5.22±0.15 b | 7.41±0.39 de | 41.95 | 24.33±8.25 abc | ||
象牙香占 Xiangyaxiangzhan | 19.63±0.16 a | 21.32±0.16 c | 8.61 | 42.95±0.64 a | 34.46±1.65 c | –19.77 | 6.59±0.12 a | 8.49±0.11 bc | 28.83 | 12.67±1.20 abc | ||
中香1号 Zhongxiang 1 | 14.31±0.18 e | 18.93±0.09 e | 32.29 | 36.44±1.15 b | 34.93±1.26 c | –4.14 | 5.27±0.18 b | 7.91±0.33 bcd | 50.09 | 1.33±0.88 c | ||
美香占2号 Meixiangzhan 2 | 17.23±0.09 c | 16.35±0.08 g | –5.11 | 34.53±0.57 b | 24.22±1.46 d | –29.86 | 5.29±0.11 b | 6.73±0.29 e | 27.22 | 16.00±8.33 abc |
表1 高温胁迫对秧苗素质的影响
Table 1 Effect of high temperature stress on seedling quality.
品种 Variety | 株高 Plant height | 单株鲜质量 Fresh weight per plant | 单株干质量 Dry weight per plant | 株成活率 Survival rate/% | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理前 Before treatment /cm | 处理后 After treatment /cm | 变化率 Change rate/% | 处理前 Before treatment /mg | 处理后 After treatment /mg | 变化率 Change rate/% | 处理前 Before treatment /mg | 处理后 After treatment /mg | 变化率 Change rate/% | ||||
玉香油占 Yuxiangyouzhan | 16.94±0.04 c | 18.09±0.03 f | 6.79 | 36.27±1.25 b | 45.81±4.31 b | 26.30 | 5.64±0.13 b | 8.64±0.54 b | 53.19 | 36.67±27.24 ab | ||
巴斯马蒂 Basmati | 17.82±0.27 b | 23.13±0.03 a | 29.80 | 37.97±2.11 b | 57.78±2.24 a | 52.17 | 5.56±0.19 b | 9.69±0.22 a | 74.28 | 37.33±6.01 a | ||
桂香占 Guixiangzhan | 19.57±0.10 a | 21.58±0.09 c | 10.27 | 42.91±1.54 a | 22.97±0.69 d | –46.47 | 6.37±0.22 a | 7.54±0.20 de | 18.37 | 4.33±1.20 bc | ||
农香18 Nongxiang 18 | 15.65±0.19 d | 20.25±0.09 d | 29.39 | 35.55±1.03 b | 26.47±1.07 d | –25.54 | 5.43±0.16 b | 7.68±0.19 cd | 41.44 | 13.33±3.18 abc | ||
湘晚籼13 Xiangwanxian 13 | 17.86±0.06 b | 22.28±0.03 b | 24.75 | 37.43±0.93 b | 45.17±1.36 b | 20.68 | 5.22±0.15 b | 7.41±0.39 de | 41.95 | 24.33±8.25 abc | ||
象牙香占 Xiangyaxiangzhan | 19.63±0.16 a | 21.32±0.16 c | 8.61 | 42.95±0.64 a | 34.46±1.65 c | –19.77 | 6.59±0.12 a | 8.49±0.11 bc | 28.83 | 12.67±1.20 abc | ||
中香1号 Zhongxiang 1 | 14.31±0.18 e | 18.93±0.09 e | 32.29 | 36.44±1.15 b | 34.93±1.26 c | –4.14 | 5.27±0.18 b | 7.91±0.33 bcd | 50.09 | 1.33±0.88 c | ||
美香占2号 Meixiangzhan 2 | 17.23±0.09 c | 16.35±0.08 g | –5.11 | 34.53±0.57 b | 24.22±1.46 d | –29.86 | 5.29±0.11 b | 6.73±0.29 e | 27.22 | 16.00±8.33 abc |
品种 Variety | 净光合速率Pn | 气孔导度Gs | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理前 Before treatment /(μmol·m-2s-1) | 处理后 After treatment /(μmol·m-2s-1) | 变化率 Change rate/% | 处理前 Before treatment /(mol·m-2s-1) | 处理后 After treatment /(mol·m-2.s-1) | 变化率 Change rate/% | ||
玉香油占Yuxiangyouzhan | 20.90±1.34 a | 6.92±0.46 a | -66.89 | 0.25±0.04 bc | 0.15±0.05 a | -41.84 | |
巴斯马蒂Basmati | 21.80±0.90 a | 3.52±0.13 b | -83.85 | 0.33±0.03 abc | 0.09±0.02 ab | -72.03 | |
桂香占Guixiangzhan | 13.42±0.23 c | 4.07±0.68 b | -69.67 | 0.38±0.02 ab | 0.12±0.04 ab | -67.59 | |
农香18 Nongxiang 18 | 12.85±0.53 c | 1.32±0.25 c | -89.73 | 0.32±0.09 abc | 0.09±0.06 ab | -70.94 | |
湘晚籼13 Xiangwanxian 13 | 15.78±0.00 b | 3.51±0.17 b | -77.76 | 0.40±0.02 a | 0.17±0.02 a | -58.01 | |
象牙香占 Xiangyaxiangzhan | 20.70±0.20 a | 0.74±0.03 c | -96.43 | 0.41±0.01 a | 0.13±0.02 ab | -69.43 | |
中香1号Zhongxiang 1 | 20.52±0.10 a | 1.15±0.10 c | -94.40 | 0.33±0.02 abc | 0.02±0.01 b | -94.35 | |
美香占2号Meixiangzhan 2 | 20.10±0.17 a | 1.32±0.34 c | -93.43 | 0.23±0.04 c | 0.15±0.03 a | -35.05 | |
品种 Variety | 胞间CO2浓度Ci | 蒸腾速率Tr | |||||
处理前 Before treatment /(mol·mol-1) | 处理后 After treatment /(mol·mol-1) | 变化率 Change rate/% | 处理前 Before treatment /(mmol·mol-1) | 处理后 After treatment stress/(mmol·mol-1) | 变化率 Change rate/% | ||
玉香油占Yuxiangyouzhan | 239.11±12.25 de | 351.13±34.40 ab | 46.85 | 6.92±0.84 bc | 4.43±1.44 a | -35.99 | |
巴斯马蒂Basmati | 264.24±13.22 cde | 312.55±14.55 ab | 18.28 | 9.28±0.70 abc | 2.92±0.53 ab | -68.55 | |
桂香占Guixiangzhan | 329.33±6.21 a | 320.16±29.40 ab | -2.78 | 9.38±0.40 abc | 3.67±1.28 ab | -60.91 | |
农香18 Nongxiang 18 | 319.35±13.04 a | 347.91±18.40 ab | 8.94 | 7.93±1.80 abc | 2.74±1.68 ab | -65.49 | |
湘晚籼13 Xiangwanxian 13 | 315.49±4.34 ab | 351.77±5.91 a | 11.50 | 9.93±0.01 ab | 4.78±0.37 a | -51.89 | |
象牙香占 Xiangyaxiangzhan | 296.70±3.70 abc | 373.66±1.14 a | 25.94 | 10.61±0.07 a | 3.62±0.49 ab | -65.86 | |
中香1号Zhongxiang 1 | 274.51±5.07 bcd | 289.42±8.29 b | 5.43 | 8.90±0.73 abc | 0.56±0.01 b | -93.68 | |
美香占2号Meixiangzhan 2 | 229.43±27.35 e | 366.61±0.19 a | 59.79 | 6.47±1.04 c | 4.17±0.73 a | -35.55 |
表2 高温胁迫对秧苗光合速率以及气体交换的影响
Table 2 Effect of high temperature stress on photosynthetic rate and gas exchange of seedling.
品种 Variety | 净光合速率Pn | 气孔导度Gs | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理前 Before treatment /(μmol·m-2s-1) | 处理后 After treatment /(μmol·m-2s-1) | 变化率 Change rate/% | 处理前 Before treatment /(mol·m-2s-1) | 处理后 After treatment /(mol·m-2.s-1) | 变化率 Change rate/% | ||
玉香油占Yuxiangyouzhan | 20.90±1.34 a | 6.92±0.46 a | -66.89 | 0.25±0.04 bc | 0.15±0.05 a | -41.84 | |
巴斯马蒂Basmati | 21.80±0.90 a | 3.52±0.13 b | -83.85 | 0.33±0.03 abc | 0.09±0.02 ab | -72.03 | |
桂香占Guixiangzhan | 13.42±0.23 c | 4.07±0.68 b | -69.67 | 0.38±0.02 ab | 0.12±0.04 ab | -67.59 | |
农香18 Nongxiang 18 | 12.85±0.53 c | 1.32±0.25 c | -89.73 | 0.32±0.09 abc | 0.09±0.06 ab | -70.94 | |
湘晚籼13 Xiangwanxian 13 | 15.78±0.00 b | 3.51±0.17 b | -77.76 | 0.40±0.02 a | 0.17±0.02 a | -58.01 | |
象牙香占 Xiangyaxiangzhan | 20.70±0.20 a | 0.74±0.03 c | -96.43 | 0.41±0.01 a | 0.13±0.02 ab | -69.43 | |
中香1号Zhongxiang 1 | 20.52±0.10 a | 1.15±0.10 c | -94.40 | 0.33±0.02 abc | 0.02±0.01 b | -94.35 | |
美香占2号Meixiangzhan 2 | 20.10±0.17 a | 1.32±0.34 c | -93.43 | 0.23±0.04 c | 0.15±0.03 a | -35.05 | |
品种 Variety | 胞间CO2浓度Ci | 蒸腾速率Tr | |||||
处理前 Before treatment /(mol·mol-1) | 处理后 After treatment /(mol·mol-1) | 变化率 Change rate/% | 处理前 Before treatment /(mmol·mol-1) | 处理后 After treatment stress/(mmol·mol-1) | 变化率 Change rate/% | ||
玉香油占Yuxiangyouzhan | 239.11±12.25 de | 351.13±34.40 ab | 46.85 | 6.92±0.84 bc | 4.43±1.44 a | -35.99 | |
巴斯马蒂Basmati | 264.24±13.22 cde | 312.55±14.55 ab | 18.28 | 9.28±0.70 abc | 2.92±0.53 ab | -68.55 | |
桂香占Guixiangzhan | 329.33±6.21 a | 320.16±29.40 ab | -2.78 | 9.38±0.40 abc | 3.67±1.28 ab | -60.91 | |
农香18 Nongxiang 18 | 319.35±13.04 a | 347.91±18.40 ab | 8.94 | 7.93±1.80 abc | 2.74±1.68 ab | -65.49 | |
湘晚籼13 Xiangwanxian 13 | 315.49±4.34 ab | 351.77±5.91 a | 11.50 | 9.93±0.01 ab | 4.78±0.37 a | -51.89 | |
象牙香占 Xiangyaxiangzhan | 296.70±3.70 abc | 373.66±1.14 a | 25.94 | 10.61±0.07 a | 3.62±0.49 ab | -65.86 | |
中香1号Zhongxiang 1 | 274.51±5.07 bcd | 289.42±8.29 b | 5.43 | 8.90±0.73 abc | 0.56±0.01 b | -93.68 | |
美香占2号Meixiangzhan 2 | 229.43±27.35 e | 366.61±0.19 a | 59.79 | 6.47±1.04 c | 4.17±0.73 a | -35.55 |
品种 Variety | 初始荧光产量F0 | 最大荧光产量Fm | 可变荧光产量Fv | PSⅡ最大光化学量子产量Fv/Fm | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理前 Before treatment | 处理后 After treatment | 处理前 Before treatment | 处理后 After treatment | 处理前 Before treatment | 处理后 After treatment | 处理前 Before treatment | 处理后 After treatment | ||||
玉香油占 Yuxiangyouzhan | 0.060±0.020 a | 0.066±0.020 a | 0.242±0.080 a | 0.185±0.040 a | 0.181±0.060 a | 0.119±0.020 a | 0.744±0.010 ab | 0.644±0.030 ab | |||
巴斯马蒂 Basmati | 0.055±0.020 a | 0.062±0.010 a | 0.233±0.060 a | 0.148±0.040 a | 0.178±0.040 a | 0.086±0.030 a | 0.768±0.010 a | 0.557±0.080 ab | |||
桂香占 Guixiangzhan | 0.070±0.010 a | 0.079±0.000 a | 0.289±0.060 a | 0.209±0.010 a | 0.219±0.050 a | 0.130±0.010 a | 0.752±0.010 ab | 0.623±0.010 ab | |||
农香18 Nongxiang 18 | 0.064±0.020 a | 0.084±0.010 a | 0.269±0.070 a | 0.239±0.030 a | 0.204±0.050 a | 0.155±0.020 a | 0.764±0.010 a | 0.652±0.010 a | |||
湘晚籼13 Xiangwanxian 13 | 0.055±0.010 a | 0.087±0.020 a | 0.216±0.030 a | 0.232±0.050 a | 0.162±0.020 a | 0.145±0.030 a | 0.746±0.000 ab | 0.625±0.030 ab | |||
象牙香占 Xiangyaxiangzhan | 0.062±0.020 a | 0.100±0.010 a | 0.241±0.080 a | 0.245±0.030 a | 0.179±0.060 a | 0.145±0.020 a | 0.734±0.010 b | 0.590±0.030 ab | |||
中香1号 Zhongxiang 1 | 0.083±0.000 a | 0.084±0.030 a | 0.345±0.020 a | 0.254±0.100 a | 0.262±0.020 a | 0.170±0.070 a | 0.760±0.000 ab | 0.671±0.020 a | |||
美香占2号 Meixiangzhan 2 | 0.050±0.010 a | 0.065±0.010 a | 0.199±0.040 a | 0.145±0.040 a | 0.149±0.030 a | 0.080±0.030 a | 0.750±0.010 ab | 0.529±0.050 b |
表3 高温胁迫对秧苗叶绿素荧光特性的影响
Table 3 Effect of high temperature stress on chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of seedling
品种 Variety | 初始荧光产量F0 | 最大荧光产量Fm | 可变荧光产量Fv | PSⅡ最大光化学量子产量Fv/Fm | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理前 Before treatment | 处理后 After treatment | 处理前 Before treatment | 处理后 After treatment | 处理前 Before treatment | 处理后 After treatment | 处理前 Before treatment | 处理后 After treatment | ||||
玉香油占 Yuxiangyouzhan | 0.060±0.020 a | 0.066±0.020 a | 0.242±0.080 a | 0.185±0.040 a | 0.181±0.060 a | 0.119±0.020 a | 0.744±0.010 ab | 0.644±0.030 ab | |||
巴斯马蒂 Basmati | 0.055±0.020 a | 0.062±0.010 a | 0.233±0.060 a | 0.148±0.040 a | 0.178±0.040 a | 0.086±0.030 a | 0.768±0.010 a | 0.557±0.080 ab | |||
桂香占 Guixiangzhan | 0.070±0.010 a | 0.079±0.000 a | 0.289±0.060 a | 0.209±0.010 a | 0.219±0.050 a | 0.130±0.010 a | 0.752±0.010 ab | 0.623±0.010 ab | |||
农香18 Nongxiang 18 | 0.064±0.020 a | 0.084±0.010 a | 0.269±0.070 a | 0.239±0.030 a | 0.204±0.050 a | 0.155±0.020 a | 0.764±0.010 a | 0.652±0.010 a | |||
湘晚籼13 Xiangwanxian 13 | 0.055±0.010 a | 0.087±0.020 a | 0.216±0.030 a | 0.232±0.050 a | 0.162±0.020 a | 0.145±0.030 a | 0.746±0.000 ab | 0.625±0.030 ab | |||
象牙香占 Xiangyaxiangzhan | 0.062±0.020 a | 0.100±0.010 a | 0.241±0.080 a | 0.245±0.030 a | 0.179±0.060 a | 0.145±0.020 a | 0.734±0.010 b | 0.590±0.030 ab | |||
中香1号 Zhongxiang 1 | 0.083±0.000 a | 0.084±0.030 a | 0.345±0.020 a | 0.254±0.100 a | 0.262±0.020 a | 0.170±0.070 a | 0.760±0.000 ab | 0.671±0.020 a | |||
美香占2号 Meixiangzhan 2 | 0.050±0.010 a | 0.065±0.010 a | 0.199±0.040 a | 0.145±0.040 a | 0.149±0.030 a | 0.080±0.030 a | 0.750±0.010 ab | 0.529±0.050 b |
品种 Variety | POD活性Peroxidase activity | SOD活性 Superoxide dismutase activity | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理前 Before treatment /(U·g-1min-1) | 处理后 After treatment /(U·g-1min-1) | 变化率 Change rate /% | 处理前 Before treatment /(U·g-1) | 处理后 After treatment /(U·g-1) | 变化率 Change rate /% | ||
玉香油占Yuxiangyouzhan | 409.15±8.96 bc | 328.93±2.02 h | -19.61 | 579.44±56.94 ab | 94.69±32.63 c | -83.66 | |
巴斯马蒂Basmati | 389.74±5.91 c | 533.68±7.02 f | 36.93 | 599.79±40.02 a | 162.97±20.79 c | -72.83 | |
桂香占Guixiangzhan | 407.20±4.28 bc | 792.27±0.21 a | 94.57 | 204.21±38.60 e | 579.17±29.24 a | 183.61 | |
农香18 Nongxiang 18 | 444.16±9.83 a | 576.23±7.36 d | 29.73 | 364.66±102.07 c | 316.51±103.05 b | -13.20 | |
湘晚籼13 Xiangwanxian 13 | 392.19±1.77 c | 605.61±2.63 c | 54.42 | 656.63±45.37 a | 654.48±34.93 a | -0.33 | |
象牙香占 Xiangyaxiangzhan | 422.60±0.93 ab | 556.74±4.70 e | 31.74 | 218.30±41.91 de | 238.53±60.03 bc | 9.27 | |
中香1号Zhongxiang 1 | 430.77±17.07 ab | 760.57±9.23 b | 76.56 | 360.32±122.01 cd | 518.79±10.73 a | 43.98 | |
美香占2号Meixiangzhan 2 | 331.28±1.14 d | 402.11±3.75 g | 21.38 | 447.73±51.19 bc | 149.20±33.10 c | -66.68 | |
品种 Variety | CAT活性 Catalase activity | MDA含量 Malondialdehyde content | |||||
处理前 Before treatment /(U·g-1 min-1) | 处理后 After treatment /(U·g-1 min-1) | 变化率 Change rate /% | 处理前 Before treatment /(μmol·g-1) | 处理后 After treatment /(μmol·g-1) | 变化率 Change rate /% | ||
玉香油占Yuxiangyouzhan | 63.45±1.18 e | 20.21±0.65 d | -68.15 | 7.67±1.04 de | 7.80±0.65 e | 1.69 | |
巴斯马蒂Basmati | 107.81±0.24 a | 40.27±0.17 b | -62.65 | 18.75±1.46 a | 12.49±1.76 cd | -33.39 | |
桂香占Guixiangzhan | 53.47±1.05 f | 18.59±0.21 d | -65.23 | 5.48±0.84 e | 26.41±1.07 a | 381.93 | |
农香18 Nongxiang 18 | 70.08±1.17 d | 34.65±0.62 c | -50.56 | 10.98±0.28 bc | 19.45±2.56 b | 77.14 | |
湘晚籼13 Xiangwanxian 13 | 80.47±1.13 c | 47.60±1.57 a | -40.85 | 13.19±0.82 b | 16.56±1.45 bc | 25.55 | |
象牙香占 Xiangyaxiangzhan | 55.37±0.54 f | 19.90±0.64 d | -64.06 | 7.98±1.86 cde | 17.72±0.38 b | 122.06 | |
中香1号Zhongxiang 1 | 93.08±2.77 b | 42.44±1.91 b | -54.40 | 6.50±0.33 e | 20.46±0.61 b | 214.77 | |
美香占2号Meixiangzhan 2 | 41.80±0.73 g | 14.50±0.14 e | -65.31 | 9.90±0.08 cd | 10.58±0.72 de | 6.87 |
表4 高温胁迫对秧苗抗氧化酶活性以及丙二醛含量的影响
Table 4 Effect of high temperature stress on antioxidant enzyme activities and MAD content in seedlings.
品种 Variety | POD活性Peroxidase activity | SOD活性 Superoxide dismutase activity | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理前 Before treatment /(U·g-1min-1) | 处理后 After treatment /(U·g-1min-1) | 变化率 Change rate /% | 处理前 Before treatment /(U·g-1) | 处理后 After treatment /(U·g-1) | 变化率 Change rate /% | ||
玉香油占Yuxiangyouzhan | 409.15±8.96 bc | 328.93±2.02 h | -19.61 | 579.44±56.94 ab | 94.69±32.63 c | -83.66 | |
巴斯马蒂Basmati | 389.74±5.91 c | 533.68±7.02 f | 36.93 | 599.79±40.02 a | 162.97±20.79 c | -72.83 | |
桂香占Guixiangzhan | 407.20±4.28 bc | 792.27±0.21 a | 94.57 | 204.21±38.60 e | 579.17±29.24 a | 183.61 | |
农香18 Nongxiang 18 | 444.16±9.83 a | 576.23±7.36 d | 29.73 | 364.66±102.07 c | 316.51±103.05 b | -13.20 | |
湘晚籼13 Xiangwanxian 13 | 392.19±1.77 c | 605.61±2.63 c | 54.42 | 656.63±45.37 a | 654.48±34.93 a | -0.33 | |
象牙香占 Xiangyaxiangzhan | 422.60±0.93 ab | 556.74±4.70 e | 31.74 | 218.30±41.91 de | 238.53±60.03 bc | 9.27 | |
中香1号Zhongxiang 1 | 430.77±17.07 ab | 760.57±9.23 b | 76.56 | 360.32±122.01 cd | 518.79±10.73 a | 43.98 | |
美香占2号Meixiangzhan 2 | 331.28±1.14 d | 402.11±3.75 g | 21.38 | 447.73±51.19 bc | 149.20±33.10 c | -66.68 | |
品种 Variety | CAT活性 Catalase activity | MDA含量 Malondialdehyde content | |||||
处理前 Before treatment /(U·g-1 min-1) | 处理后 After treatment /(U·g-1 min-1) | 变化率 Change rate /% | 处理前 Before treatment /(μmol·g-1) | 处理后 After treatment /(μmol·g-1) | 变化率 Change rate /% | ||
玉香油占Yuxiangyouzhan | 63.45±1.18 e | 20.21±0.65 d | -68.15 | 7.67±1.04 de | 7.80±0.65 e | 1.69 | |
巴斯马蒂Basmati | 107.81±0.24 a | 40.27±0.17 b | -62.65 | 18.75±1.46 a | 12.49±1.76 cd | -33.39 | |
桂香占Guixiangzhan | 53.47±1.05 f | 18.59±0.21 d | -65.23 | 5.48±0.84 e | 26.41±1.07 a | 381.93 | |
农香18 Nongxiang 18 | 70.08±1.17 d | 34.65±0.62 c | -50.56 | 10.98±0.28 bc | 19.45±2.56 b | 77.14 | |
湘晚籼13 Xiangwanxian 13 | 80.47±1.13 c | 47.60±1.57 a | -40.85 | 13.19±0.82 b | 16.56±1.45 bc | 25.55 | |
象牙香占 Xiangyaxiangzhan | 55.37±0.54 f | 19.90±0.64 d | -64.06 | 7.98±1.86 cde | 17.72±0.38 b | 122.06 | |
中香1号Zhongxiang 1 | 93.08±2.77 b | 42.44±1.91 b | -54.40 | 6.50±0.33 e | 20.46±0.61 b | 214.77 | |
美香占2号Meixiangzhan 2 | 41.80±0.73 g | 14.50±0.14 e | -65.31 | 9.90±0.08 cd | 10.58±0.72 de | 6.87 |
[1] | 罗昊文, 钟卓君, 聂俊, 唐湘如. 超声波处理对粤晶丝苗生理特性及产量、品质的影响. 中国稻米, 2017, 23(2): 64-67. |
Luo H W, Zhong Z J, Nie J, Tang X R.Effects of ultrasound on physiological characters, yield and quality of rice Yuejingsimiao.China Rice, 2017, 23(2): 64-67(in Chinese) | |
[2] | 张洪程, 龚金龙. 中国水稻种植机械化高产农艺研究现状及发展探讨. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(07): 1273-1289. |
Zhang H C, Gong J L.Research status and development discussion on high-yielding agronomy of mechanized planting rice in China.Sci Agric Sin, 2014, 47(7): 1273-1289. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 贾士荣, 袁潜华, 王丰, 姚克敏, 裴新梧, 胡凝, 王志兴, 王旭静, 柳武革, 钱前. 转基因水稻基因飘流研究十年回顾. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(1): 1-10. |
Jia S R, Yuan Q H, Wang F, Yao K M, Pei X W, Hu N, Wang Z X, Wang X J, Liu W G, Qian Q.What we have learnt in ten years’ study of rice transgene flow.Sci Agric Sin, 2014, 47(1): 1-10. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 沈永平, 王国亚. IPCC第一工作组第五次评估报告对全球气候变化认知的最新科学要点. 冰川冻土, 2013, 35(5): 1068-1076. |
Shen Y P, Wang G Y.Key findings and assessment results of IPCC WGI Fifth assessment report.J Glaciol Geocryol, 2013, 35(5): 1068-1076. (in Chinese) | |
[5] | 张桂莲, 陈立云, 雷东阳, 张顺堂. 水稻耐热性研究进展. 杂交水稻, 2005, 20(1): 1-5. |
Zhang G L, Chen L Y, Lei D Y, Zhang S T.Progresses in research on heat tolerance in rice.Hybrid Rice, 2005, 20(1): 1-5. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 黄显波, 严寒, 胡建林, 田志宏. 高温胁迫下水稻幼苗几个相关生理指标的变化. 长江大学学报: 自然科学版农学卷, 2008, 5(2): 50-53. |
Huang X B, Yan H, Hu J L, Tian Z H.Changes of several related physiological indexes of rice seedlings under high temperature stress.J Yangtze Univ: Nat Sci Edit, Agric Sci, 2008, 5(2): 50-53. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 李仁忠, 刘海英, 李建业, 叶海龙, 余久红, 金志凤. 浙江省早稻高温热害发生规律及防御措施. 浙江气象, 2011, 32(1): 23-26, 45. |
Li R Z, Liu H Y, Li J Y, Ye H L, Yu J H, Jin Z F.Occurrence law and prevention measures of high temperature heat damage of early rice in Zhejiang Province.Zhejiang Meteorol, 2011, 32(1): 23-26, 45. (in Chinese) | |
[8] | 熊玉江, 乔伟, 姚付启, 罗文兵, 袁念念, 付浩龙. 气候变化和灌溉方式对稻田需水量的影响. 长江科学院院报, 2018, 35(4): 76-80. |
Xiong Y J, Qiao W, Yao F Q, Luo W B, Yuan N N, Fu H L.Effect of climate change and irrigation pattern on water demand of paddy field.J Yangtze River Sci Res Instit, 2018, 35(4): 76-80. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 赵庆雷, 吴修, 王瑜, 李曰鹏, 陈博聪, 王佳, 马加清. 扬花期高温条件下施肥量对水稻高位分蘖及产量性状的影响. 山东农业科学, 2016, 48(8): 61-66. |
Zhao Q L, Wu X, Wang Y, Li Y P, Chen B C, Wang J, Ma J Q.Effects of high temperature at flowering stage and fertilization on high-node tillering and yield traits of rice.Shandong Agric Sci. 2016, 48(8): 61-66. (in Chinese) | |
[10] | 陈蔚. 高温对水稻生育特性的影响及其防御对策. 湖北农业科学, 2010, 49(8): 1817-1818. |
Chen W.Effects of high temperature on growth and development characteristics of rice and its preventive measures.Hubei Agric Sci, 2010, 49(8): 1817-1818. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 段骅, 杨建昌. 高温对水稻的影响及其机制的研究进展. 中国水稻科学, 2012, 26(4): 393-400. |
Duan H, Yang J C.Research Advances in the effect of high temperature on rice and its mechanism.Chin J Rice Sci. 2012, 26(4): 393-400. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 王小菁, 萧浪涛, 董爱武, 王台, 钱前, 漆小泉, 陈凡, 左建儒, 杨淑华, 顾红雅, 陈之端, 姜里文, 白永飞, 孔宏智, 种康. 2016年中国植物科学若干领域重要研究进展. 植物学报, 2017, 52(4): 394-452. |
Wang X J, Xiao L T, Dong A W, Wang T, Qian Q, Qi X Q, Chen F, Zuo J R, Yang S H, Gu H Y, Chen Z D, Jiang L W, Bai Y F, Kong H Z, Zhong K.Research progress in several fields of Chinese plant science in 2016.Chin Bull Bot, 2017, 52(4): 394-452. (in Chinese) | |
[13] | Zhang X J, Zhang S Y, Li C Q, Zhang W H.Effects of high temperature stress on growth of stress-tolerant rice seedlings with resistibility.Agric Sci & Technol, 2014, 15(4): 576-578, 584. |
[14] | 朱雪梅, 柯永培, 邵继荣, 林立金, 杨远祥.高温胁迫对重穗型水稻品种叶片活性氧代谢的影响. 种子, 2005, 24(3): 25-27, 32. |
Zhu X M, Ke Y P, Shao J R, Lin L J, Yang Y X.Effects of high temperature stress on activated oxygen metabolism of the heavy panicle type of medium indica hybrid rice.Seed, 2005, 24(3): 25-27, 32. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000. |
Li H S.Principles and Techniques of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry Experiments. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000. (in Chinese) | |
[16] | Wahid A, Gelani S, Ashraf M, Foolad M R.Heat tolerance in plants: An overview.Environ Exp Bot, 2007, 61(3): 199-223. |
[17] | 杨纯明, Heilman L J.谢国禄译. 短期高温对水稻生长发育和产量的影响. 国外作物育种, 1994, 13(2): 4-5. |
Yang C M, Heilman L J.Xie G L Trans. Effects of short-term high temperature on rice growth and yield.Forei Crop Breeding, 1994, 13(2): 4-5. (in Chinese) | |
[18] | 张桂莲, 陈立云, 张顺堂, 刘国华, 唐文邦, 贺治洲, 王明. 抽穗开花期高温对水稻剑叶理化特性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2007, 40(7): 1345-1352. |
Zhang G L, Chen L Y, Zhang S T, Liu G H, Tang W B, He Z Z, Wang M.Effects of high temperature on physiological and biochemical characteristics in flag leaf of rice during heading and flowering period.Sci Agric Sin, 2007, 40(7): 1345-1352. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | Barnabás B, Jäger K, Fehér A.The effect of drought and heat stress on reproductive processes in cereals.Plant Cell & Environ, 2008, 31(1): 11-38. |
[20] | 杨卫丽, 黄福灯, 曹珍珍, 雷炳婷, 胡东维, 程方民. 高温胁迫对水稻光合PSⅡ系统伤害及其与叶绿体D1蛋白间关系. 作物学报, 2013, 39(6): 1060-1068. |
Yang W L, Huang F D, Cao Z Z, Lei B T, Hu D W, Cheng F M.Effects of high temperature stress on PSⅡ function and its relation to D1 protein in chloroplast thylakoid in rice flag leaves.Acta Agron Sin, 2013, 39(6): 1060-1068. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 曹云英, 赵华. 高温胁迫下油菜素内酯对水稻幼苗的保护作用. 中国水稻科学, 2007, 21(5): 525-529. |
Cao Y Y, Zhao H.Protective roles of brassinolide in rice seedlings under heat stress.Chin J Rice Sci, 2007, 21(5): 525-529. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 郑小林, 董任瑞. 水稻热激反应的研究: Ⅲ.高温对水稻幼苗叶片过氧化物酶的影响. 湖南农业大学学报, 1998, 24(6): 13-16. |
Zheng X L, Dong R R.A Study on the response of rice to heat shock: Ⅲ. High temperature’s effect on peroxidase in seedling leaves of rice.J Hunan Agric Unive, 1998, 24(06): 13-16. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 陈贵, 胡文玉, 谢甫绨, 张立军. 提取植物体内MDA的溶剂及MDA作为衰老指标的探讨. 植物生理学通讯, 1991, 27(1): 44-46. |
Chen G, Hu W Y, Xie P T, Zhang L J.Solvent for extracting malondialdehyde in plant as an index of senescence.Plant Physiol Commun, 1997, 27(1): 44-46. (in Chinese) | |
[24] | 陈少裕. 膜脂过氧化对植物细胞的伤害. 植物生理学通讯, 1991, 27(2): 84-90. |
Chen S Y.Membrane-lipid peroxidation and plant stress.Chin Bull Bot, 1991, 27(2): 84-90. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 景秀, 周苗, 王晶, 王岩, 王旺, 王开, 郭保卫, 胡雅杰, 邢志鹏, 许轲, 张洪程. 穗分化末期-灌浆初期干旱胁迫对优质食味粳稻根系形态和叶片光合特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(1): 33-47. |
[2] | 朱旺, 张翔, 耿孝宇, 张哲, 陈英龙, 韦还和, 戴其根, 许轲, 朱广龙, 周桂生, 孟天瑶. 盐-旱复合胁迫下水稻根系的形态和生理特征及其与产量形成的关系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(6): 617-627. |
[3] | 董立强, 杨铁鑫, 李睿, 商文奇, 马亮, 李跃东, 隋国民. 株行距配置对超高产田水稻产量及根系形态生理特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 392-404. |
[4] | 陈云, 刘昆, 李婷婷, 李思宇, 李国明, 张伟杨, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 结实期干湿交替灌溉对水稻根系、产量和土壤的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(3): 269-277. |
[5] | 魏晓东, 张亚东, 赵凌, 路凯, 宋雪梅, 王才林. 稻米香味物质2-乙酰-1-吡咯啉的形成及其影响因素[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(2): 131-138. |
[6] | 褚光, 徐冉, 陈松, 徐春梅, 刘元辉, 章秀福, 王丹英. 优化栽培模式对水稻根-冠生长特性、水氮利用效率和产量的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(6): 586-594. |
[7] | 李玉祥, 林海荣, 梁倩, 王国栋. 多巴胺引发对盐胁迫下水稻种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(5): 487-494. |
[8] | 潘阳阳, 陈宜波, 王重荣, 李宏, 黄道强, 周德贵, 王志东, 赵雷, 龚蓉, 周少川. γ-氨基丁酸和2-乙酰-1-吡咯啉代谢通路在水稻籽粒发育过程中的变化分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(2): 121-129. |
[9] | 李婷婷, 冯钰枫, 朱安, 黄健, 汪浩, 李思宇, 刘昆, 彭如梦, 张宏路, 刘立军. 主要节水灌溉方式对水稻根系形态生理的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(4): 293-302. |
[10] | 邓卉, 鄂志国, 牛百晓, 王磊, 陈忱. DNA甲基化抑制剂5-氮脱氧胞苷对水稻基因组甲基化及幼苗生长发育的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(2): 108-117. |
[11] | 郭保卫, 许轲, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 魏海燕, 陈厚存. 有序摆抛栽超高产栽培对水稻根系形态生理特征的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2016, 30(6): 611-625. |
[12] | 向妙莲1,付永琦1 ,何永明1 ,黄友明1,2,曾晓春1,2,*. 茉莉酸甲酯浸种对水稻幼苗白叶枯病抗性及抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2014, 28(4): 419-426. |
[13] | 郑洪亮,刘博文,赵宏伟,王敬国,刘化龙,孙健,邢军,邹德堂*. 利用连锁和关联分析定位粳稻芽期及幼苗前期耐盐性QTL[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2014, 28(4): 358-366. |
[14] | 李洪亮,孙玉友,曲金玲,魏才强,孙国宏,赵云彤,柴永山*. 施氮量对东北粳稻根系形态生理特征的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2012, 26(6): 723-730. |
[15] | 王洋,郭媛,洪德林, . 水稻幼苗耐缺氧能力的QTL分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2010, 24(1): 18-24 . |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||