缓释氮肥减量配施和株距对机插杂交籼稻氮素利用的影响

doi:10.16819/j.1001-7216.2018.7092

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】进一步研究缓释氮肥减量配施和株距对机插杂交籼稻主要生育时期氮素积累、转运、氮肥利用率及产量的影响,并探讨机插密度和缓释氮肥配施耦合下,氮素吸收、转运及利用率与产量间的关系。【方法】在前期研究确定高产施氮量180 kg/hm²,机插稻缓释氮肥与常规氮肥适宜配比为7∶3基础上,设3种株距(行距均为30 cm)：16、18和20 cm,以及4种缓释氮肥(36、66、96 和126 kg/hm²)与常规氮肥(54 kg/hm²)配施处理。【结果】缓释氮肥减量配施和株距对机插稻主要生育时期氮素积累总量、成熟期叶片及穗部氮素吸收量、氮素转运量、氮肥利用率及产量均存在显著或极显著的互作效应;缓释氮肥减量配施对机插稻产量及氮素吸收利用与转运特性的影响显著大于株距。株距为18 cm,缓释氮肥(96 kg/hm²)与常规氮肥(54 kg/hm²)配施量为150 kg/hm²能促进水稻主要生育时期及各生育阶段氮素的累积,提高结实期各器官氮素积累量,并促进叶片和茎鞘中氮素的转运,进而显著提高穗部氮素增加量(107.58 kg/hm²)、氮肥利用率(66.19%)及产量(11463.85 kg/hm²);株距为16 cm,缓释氮肥(126 kg/hm²)与常规氮肥(54 kg/hm²)配施量为180 kg/hm²虽能促进主要生育时期氮素的累积,但易造成结实期茎鞘及叶片中氮滞留量的增加,降低氮素转运率,导致氮素收获指数和氮肥利用率降低。从高产高效的角度考虑,以缓释氮肥(96 kg/hm²)与常规氮肥(54 kg/hm²)配施量150 kg/hm²为宜;当株距增加到20 cm时,主要生育时期水稻吸收氮素的绝对量少,茎鞘叶片中的氮素向穗部转运及穗部氮素积累量增加,产量及氮素利用率随缓释氮肥配施量的增加而增加,以缓释氮肥与常规氮肥配施量为180 kg/hm²为宜。相关性分析表明,缓释氮肥减量配施与株距耦合下,机插杂交稻以齐穗至成熟期氮素积累量、叶片氮素转运量与产量及氮肥利用率的相关性(r=0.54^**~0.85^**)最高,对提高氮肥利用率及产量更为重要。【结论】株距为18 cm,缓释氮肥与常规氮肥配施量为150 kg/hm²能协同提高穗部氮素增加量、氮肥利用率及产量,为本研究氮肥减量配施的最佳处理。

关键词: 机插稻, 株距, 缓释氮肥, 减量配施, 氮素利用特征

Abstract:

【Objective】To further study the effects of reduced slow-released urea combined with conventional urea under various row spacing on N accumulation at the main growth stages, N translocation (NT), N apparent use efficiency (NAUE), grain yield, and the correlations among these indexes of mechanically-transplanted rice. 【Method】Based on the previous research of high-yielding nitrogen application rate of 180 kg/hm² (the ratio of slow-released urea and conventional urea was 7:3), three plant spacing (16, 18 and 20 cm, the row spacing was 30 cm) and four treatments of reduced slow-release urea (36, 66, 96 and 126 kg/hm²) combined with conventional urea rate of 54 kg/hm² were conducted. 【Result】There were significant influences on the total nitrogen accumulation amount of the main growth stages, the nitrogen absorption amount of leaves and panicles at maturity stage, N translocation of filling stage, NAUE and grain yield of reduced slow-released urea combined with conventional urea and row spacing. The effects of reduced slow-released urea combined with conventional urea on grain yield and nitrogen absorption and translocation were significantly larger than that of row spacing. When the combined application rate was 150 kg/hm² (slow-released urea and conventional urea application rates were 96 kg/hm² and 54 kg/hm², respectively) and the plant spacing was 18 cm that could facilitate N accumulation of main growth stage, enhance N accumulation amount of different organs at grain filling stage, and promote N translocation of stem sheath and leaves, which further improve N increment of panicle(107.58 kg/hm²), NAUE(66.19%) and grain yield(11463.85 kg/hm²). Meanwhile, it could accelerate the N accumulation at main growth stages when the combined application rate was 180 kg/hm² (slow-released urea and conventional urea were 126 kg/hm² and 54 kg/hm², respectively) and plant spacing was 16 cm, but it might cause the risk of N retention at grain filling stage which decrease the nitrogen translocation rate and finally reduce the nitrogen harvest index (NHI) and NAUE. It is better when the combined application rate was 150 kg/hm² with slow-released N fertilizer was 96 kg/hm² and conventional urea was 54 kg/hm² in terms of high yield and high efficiency. However, when the plant spacing was increased to 20 cm, the absolute value of N absorption at main growth stage was decreased, the N translocation amount from stem sheath and leaves to panicle was increased as well as N accumulation amount of panicle. The grain yield and NAUE were increased with the rising slow-released urea application rate. In this conditions, the combined application rate was 180 kg/hm² (slow-release urea and conventional urea were 126 kg/hm² and 54 kg/hm², respectively) was superior to any other treatments. Correlation analysis indicated that the highest correlation (r=0.54^**~0.85^**) between the total N accumulation amount, N translocation amount of leaves from full heading stage to maturity stage and grain yield and NAUE was obtained which might play an important role in improving NAUE and grain yield.【Conclusion】The plant spacing was 18 cm, the N for 150 kg/hm² (slow-released urea and conventional urea were 96 kg/hm² and 54 kg/hm²) could maximize N increment of panicle, NAUE and grain yield.

Key words: mechanically-transplanted rice, plant spacing, slow-released urea, reduced combined application, N utilization characteristics

中图分类号:

王海月, 郭长春, 孙永健, 李应洪, 蒋明金, 严奉君, 殷尧翥, 何艳, 徐徽, 杨志远, 马均. 缓释氮肥减量配施和株距对机插杂交籼稻氮素利用的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 32(4): 374-386.

Haiyue WANG, Changchun GUO, Yongjian SUN, Yinghong LI, Mingjin JIANG, Fengjun YAN, Yaozhu YIN, Yan HE, Hui XU, Zhiyuan YANG, Jun MA. Effects of Reduced Slow-released Urea Combined with Conventional Urea Under Different Plant Spacing on Characteristics of Nitrogen Utilization in Mechanically-transplanted indica Rice[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2018, 32(4): 374-386.

图/表 9

参考文献 35

[1]	曾宪军, 蔡桂青, 田昌, 王娟, 黄维, 彭建伟. 施氮量和栽插密度对晚稻产量与氮肥利用率的影响. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(18): 20-24.
	Zeng X J, Cai G Q, Tian C, Wang J, Huang W, Peng J W.Nitrogen amount and transplanting density on yield and nitrogen utilization of late rice.Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2015, 31(18): 20-24. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	Awan T H, Sta,. Cruz P C, Chauhan B S. Growth analysis and biomass partitioning of Cyperus iria in response to rice planting density and nitrogen rate.Crop Prot, 2015, 74: 92-102.
[3]	胡雅杰, 邢志鹏, 龚金龙, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 李德剑, 沙安勤, 周有炎, 刘国林, 陆秀军, 刘国涛, 朱嘉炜. 适宜机插株行距提高不同穗型粳稻产量. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(14): 33-44.
	Hu Y J, Xing Z P, Gong J L, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Li D J, Sha A Q, Zhou Y Y, Liu G L, Lu X J, Liu G T, Zhu J W.Suitable spacing in and between rows of plants by machinery improves yield of different panicle type japonica rices.Trans CSAE, 2013, 29(14): 33-44. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	鲁艳红, 聂军, 廖育林, 周兴, 谢坚, 汤文光, 杨曾平. 不同控释氮肥减量施用对双季水稻产量和氮素利用的影响. 水土保持学报, 2016, 30(2): 155-161.
	Lu Y H, Nie J, Liao Y L, Zhou X, Xie J, Tang W G, Yang Z P.Effects of application reduction of controlled release nitrogen fertilizer on yield of double cropping rice and nitrogen nutrient uptake.J Soil Water Consv, 2016, 30(2): 155-161. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	邓中华, 明日, 李小坤, 郑磊, 徐维明, 杨运清, 任涛, 丛日环, 鲁剑巍. 不同密度和氮肥用量对水稻产量、构成因子及氮肥利用率的影响. 土壤, 2015, 47(1): 20-25.
	Deng Z H, Ming R, Li X K, Zheng L, Xu W M, Yang Y Q, Ren T, Cong R H, Lu J W.Effects of nitrogen application rate and planting density on grain yields, yield components and nitrogen use efficiencies of rice.Soil, 2015, 47(1): 20-25. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	樊红柱, 曾祥忠, 张冀, 吕世华. 移栽密度与供氮水平对水稻产量、氮素利用影响. 西南农业学报, 2010, 23(4): 1137-1141.
	Fan H Z, Zeng X Z, Zhang J, Lu S H.Effects of transplanting density and nitrogen management on rice grain and nitrogen utilization efficiency.Southwest China J Agric Sci, 2010, 23(4): 1137-1141. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	林洪鑫, 潘晓华, 石庆华, 彭春瑞, 吴建富. 施氮量与栽插密度对超级早稻中早22产量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011, 17(1): 22-28.
	Lin H X, Pan X H, Shi Q H, Peng C R, Wu J F.Effects of nitrogen fertilization and planting density on yield of super early rice Zhongzao 22.Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2011, 17(1): 22-28. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	陈佳娜, 曹放波, 谢小兵, 单双吕, 高伟, 李志斌, 黄敏, 邹应斌. 机插条件下低氮密植栽培对“早晚兼用”双季稻产量和氮素吸收利用的影响. 作物学报, 2016, 42(8): 1176-1187.
	Chen J N, Cao F B, Xie X B, Shan S L, Gao W, Li Z B, Huang M, Zou Y B.Effect of low nitrogen rate combined with high plant density on yield and nitrogen use efficiency of machine-transplanted early-late season double cropping rice.Acta Agron Sin, 2016, 42(8): 1176-1187. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	Zheng S X, Nie J, Dai P A, Zheng Y J.Nitrogen recovery and nitrate leaching of controlled release nitrogen fertilizer in irrigated paddy soil.Agri Sci & Technol, 2004, 5(3): 2-10.
[10]	Zhou W L, Lou Y S, Ren L X, Han Y, Men Y, Wu Lei.Application of controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer decreased methane emission in transgenic rice from a paddy soil.Water Air & Soil Poll, 2014, 225(3): 1897.
[11]	郑圣先, 刘德林, 聂军, 戴平安, 肖剑. 控释氮肥在淹水稻田土壤上的去向及利用率. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2004, 10(2): 137-142.
	Zheng S X, Liu D L, Nie J, Dai P A, Xiao J.Fate and recovery efficiency of controlled release nitrogen fertilizer in flooding paddy soil.Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2004, 10(2): 137-142. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	周静, 孟桂元, 龙继锐, 马国辉, 万宜珍. 缓释氮肥施用量对超级杂交早稻株两优02产量和生理特性的影响. 杂交水稻, 2011, 26(6): 62-68.
	Zhou J, Meng G Y, Long J R, Ma G H, Wan Y Z.Effects of application amount of slow-release nitrogen fertilizer on physiological characteristics and grain yield of early super hybrid rice Zhuliangyou 02.Hybrid Rice, 2011, 26(6): 62-68. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	马国辉, 龙继锐, 戴清明, 周静. 超级杂交中稻Y两优1号最佳缓释氮肥用量与密度配置研究. 杂交水稻, 2008, 23(6): 73-77.
	Ma G H, Long J R, Dai Q M, Zhou J.Studies on the optimized allocation of controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer application and planting density for medium super hybrid rice combination Y Liangyou 1. Hybrid Rice, 2008, 23(6): 73-77. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	李玥, 李应洪, 赵建红, 孙永健, 徐徽, 严奉君, 谢华英, 马均. 缓控释氮肥对机插稻氮素利用特征及产量的影响. 浙江大学学报:农业与生命科学版, 2015, 41(6): 673-684.
	Li Y, Li Y H, Zhao J H, Sun Y J, Xu H, Yan F J, Xie H Y, Ma J.Effects of slow-and controlled -release fertilizer on nitrogen utilization characteristics and yield of machine-transplanted rice.J Zhejiang Univ: Agric Life Sci Edn, 2015, 41(6): 673-684. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	钱银飞, 邵彩虹, 邱才飞, 陈先茂, 谢江, 邓国强, 陈大洲, 童金炳, 伍守恒, 彭春瑞. 包膜缓释尿素与普通尿素配施对双季超级稻产量及氮肥利用的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2015(5): 27-32.
	Qian Y F, Shao C H, Qiu C F, Chen X M, Xie J, Deng G Q, Chen D Z, Tong J B, Wu S H, Peng C R.Effects of the different mixture rates of coated slow-release urea and prilled urea on the growth of double-cropping super rice and the utilizing rate of nitrogen.Soil Fert Sci China, 2015(5): 27-32. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	王海月, 李玥, 孙永健, 李应洪, 蒋明金, 王春雨, 赵建红, 孙园园, 徐徽, 严奉君, 马均. 不同施氮水平下缓释氮肥配施对机插稻氮素利用特征及产量的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(1): 50-64.
	Wang H Y, Li Y, Sun Y J, Li Y H, Jiang M J, Wang C Y, Zhao J H, Sun Y Y, Xu H, Yan F J, Ma J.Effects of slow-release urea combined with conventional urea on characteristics of nitrogen utilization and yield in mechanical-transplanted rice under different nitrogen application rates.Chin J Rice Sci, 2017, 31(1): 50-64. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	张福锁, 王激清, 张卫峰, 崔振岭, 马文奇, 陈新平, 江荣风. 中国主要粮食作物肥料利用率现状与提高途径. 土壤学报, 2008, 45(5): 915-924.
	Zhang F S, Wang J Q, Zhang W F, Cui Z L, Ma W Q, Chen X P, Jiang R F.Nutrient use efficiencies of major cerfal crops in China and measures for improvement.Acta Pedol Sin, 2008, 45(5): 915-924. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	张卫峰, 马林, 黄高强, 武良, 陈新平, 张福锁. 中国氮肥发展、贡献和挑战. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(15): 3161-3171.
	Zhang W F, Ma L, Huang G Q, Wu L, Chen X P, Zhang F S.The development and contribution of nitrogenous fertilizer in China and challenges faced by the country.Sci Agric Sin, 2013, 46(15): 3161-3171. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	Huang J, He F, Cui K, Roland J.Buresh, Xu B, Gong W H, Peng S B. Determination of optimal nitrogen rate for rice varieties using a chlorophyll meter.Field Crops Res. 2008, 105(1-2): 70-80.
[20]	兰艳, 黄鹏, 江谷驰弘, 雷小波, 许光利, 丁春邦, 李天. 施氮量和栽插密度对粳稻D46产量及氮肥利用率的影响. 华南农业大学学报, 2016, 37(1): 20-28.
	Lan Y, Huang P, Jiang G, Lei X B, Xu G L, Ding C B, Li T.Effect of planting density and nitrogen application on yield and nitrogen uptake and utilization of japonica rice cultivar D46. J South China Agric Univ, 2016, 37(1): 20-28. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	王玉梅, 谢小兵, 陈佳娜, 单双吕, 曹放波, 高伟, 李志斌, 周雪峰, 黄敏, 邹应斌. 施氮量与机插密度对超级稻Y两优1号产量和氮肥利用率的影响. 杂交水稻, 2016, 31(4): 47-53.
	Wang Y M, Xie X B, Chen J N, Shan S L, Cao F B, Gao W, Li Z W, Zhou X F, Huang M, Zou Y B.Effects of nitrogen rate and mechanized transplanting density on grain yield and N-use efficiency of super rice Y Liangyou 1.Hybrid Rice, 2016, 31(4): 47-53. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	徐新朋, 周卫, 梁国庆, 孙静文, 王秀斌, 何萍, 徐芳森, 余喜初. 氮肥用量和密度对双季稻产量及氮肥利用率的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(3): 763-772.
	Xu X P, Zhou W, Liang G Q, Sun J W, Wang X B, He P, Xu F S, Yu X C.Effects of nitrogen and density interactions on grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of double-rice systems.Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2015, 21(3): 763-772. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	周江明, 赵琳, 董越勇, 徐进, 边武英, 毛杨仓, 章秀福. 氮肥和栽植密度对水稻产量及氮肥利用率的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16(2): 274-281.
	Zhou J M, Zhao L, Dong Y J, Xu J, Bian W Y, Mao Y C, Zhang X F.Nitrogen and transplanting density interactions on the rice yield and N use rate.Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2010, 16(2): 274-281. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	陆秀明, 黄庆, 刘怀珍, 张彬, 李惠芬, 邹积祥. 机插超级稻在不同施肥水平和不同插植密度下的生育特性及产量表现. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(21): 152-157.
	Lu X M, Huang Q, Liu H Z, Zhang B, Li H F, Zou J X.The performance of yield and growth characteristics in different fertilizer levels and different transplanting densities of super mechanical transplanting rice.Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2014, 30(21): 152-157. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	陈佳娜, 谢小兵, 伍丹丹, 曹放波, 单双吕, 高伟, 李志斌, 邹应斌. 机插密度与氮肥运筹对中嘉早17产量形成及氮肥利用率的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2015, 29(6): 628-636.
	Chen J N, Xie X B, Wu D D, Cao F B, Dan S L, Gao W, Li Z B, Zou Y B.Effects of nitrogen application and mechanical transplanting density on yield formation and nitrogen use efficiency of conventional rice Zhongjiazao 17. Chin J Rice Sci, 2007, 2015, 29(6): 628-636. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	鲁艳红, 廖育林, 聂军, 周兴, 谢坚, 杨曾平. 紫云英与尿素或控释尿素配施对双季稻产量及氮钾利用率的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(2): 360-368.
	Lu Y H, Liao Y L, Nie J, Zhou X, Xie J, Yang C P.Effect of different incorporation of Chinese milk vetch coupled with urea or controlled release urea on yield and nitrogen and potassium nutrient use efficiency in double-cropping rice system.Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2017, 23(2): 360-368. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	王斌, 万运帆, 郭晨, 李玉娥, 秦晓波, 任涛, 赵婧. 控释尿素、稳定性尿素和配施菌剂尿素提高双季稻产量和氮素利用率的效应比较. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(5): 1104-1112.
	Wang B, Wan Y F, Guo C, Li Y E, Qin X B, Ren T, Zhao J.A comparison of the effects of controlled release urea, stable urea and microorganisms increasing double rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency.Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2015, 21(5): 1104-1112. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	胡春花, 罗革彬, 曾建华, 潘孝忠. 不同类型缓释氮肥对水稻产量和氮肥利用率的影响. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(15): 174-177.
	Hu C H, Luo G B, Zeng J H, Pan X Z.Influence of different types of slow-release nitrogen fertilizer on rice yield and nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency.Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2011, 27(15): 174-177. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	刘敏, 宋付朋, 卢艳艳. 硫膜和树脂膜控释尿素对土壤硝态氮含量及氮素平衡和氮素利用率的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(2): 541-548.
	Liu M, Song F P, Lu Y Y.Effects of sulfur-and polymer-coated controlled release urea fertilizers on spatial-temporal variations of soil NO-3-N and nitrogen balance and nitrogen use efficiency.Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2015, 21(2): 541-548. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	王海月, 殷尧翥, 孙永健, 李应洪, 杨志远, 严奉君, 张绍文, 郭长春, 马均.不同株距和缓释氮肥配施量下机插杂交稻的产量及光合特性. 植物营养与肥料学报. 2017, 23(4): 843-855.
	Wang H Y, Yin Y Z, Sun Y J, Li Y H, Yang Z Y Z, Yan F J, Zhang S W, Guo C C, Ma J. Yield and photosynthetic characteristics of mechanical-transplanted rice under different slow-release nitrogen fertilizer rates and plant population.Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2017, 23(4): 843-855. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]	邓中华, 郭晨, 侯文峰, 徐维明, 邹家龙, 杨运清, 李小坤. 机插株行距和施氮量对杂交水稻产量及氮素吸收利用的影响. 杂交水稻, 2015, 30(2): 75-79.
	Deng Z H, Guo C, Hou W F, Xu W M, Zou J L, Yang Y Q, Li X K.Effects of machine-transplanting spacing and nitrogen rate on yield and nitrogen uptake and use in hybrid rice. Hybrid Rice, 2015, 30(2): 75-79. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32]	殷春渊, 张庆, 魏海燕, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 马群, 杭杰, 张胜飞. 不同产量类型水稻基因型氮素吸收、利用效率的差异. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(1): 39-50.
	Ying C Y, Zhang Q, Wei H Y, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, XU K, Ma Q, Hang J, Zhang S F.Differences in nitrogen absorption and use efficiency in rice genotypes with different yield performance.Sci Agric Sin, 2010, 43(1): 39-50. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33]	孙永健, 孙园园, 蒋明金, 李应洪, 严奉君, 徐徽, 王海月, 马均. 施肥水平对不同氮效率水稻氮素利用特征及产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(24): 4745-4756.
	Sun Y J, Sun Y Y, Jiang M J, Li Y H, Yan F J, Xu H, Wang H Y, Ma J.Effects of fertilizer levels on nitrogen utilization characteristics and yield in rice cultivars with different nitrogen use efficiencies.Sci Agric Sin, 2016, 49(24): 4745-4756. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34]	徐春梅, 周昌南, 郑根深, 王丹英, 胡培松, 章秀福. 施氮量和栽培密度对超级早稻不同器官氮素积累与转运及其吸收利用率的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2011(1): 15-20.
	Xu C M, Zhou C N, Zhen G S, Wang D Y, Hu P S, Zhang X F.Effects of nitrogen accumulation and translocation in different organs and their absorption and utilization of nitrogen under different nitrogen fertilizer rates and densities of super early rice.Soil Fert Sci China, 2011(1): 15-20. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[35]	郑克武, 邹江石, 吕川根. 氮肥和栽插密度对杂交稻“两优培九”产量及氮素吸收利用的影响. 作物学报, 2006, 32(6): 885-893.
	Zheng K W, Zou J S, Lv C G.Effects of transplanting density and nitrogen fertilizer on yield formation and N absorption in a two-line inter subspecific hybrid rice “Liangyoupeijiu”.Acta Agron sin, 2006, 32(6): 885-893. (in Chinese with English abstract)

处理 Treatment	施氮量 N application rate	缓释氮肥 Slow-released urea	常规氮肥 Conventional urea
N₀	0	0	0
N₁	90	36	54
N₂	120	66	54
N₃	150	96	54
N₄	180	126	54

处理 Treatment	施氮量 N application rate	缓释氮肥 Slow-released urea	常规氮肥 Conventional urea
N₀	0	0	0
N₁	90	36	54
N₂	120	66	54
N₃	150	96	54
N₄	180	126	54

处理 Treatment			氮素累积N accumulation/(kg·hm^-2)						稻谷产量 Grain yield /(kg·hm^-2)	氮素收获指数 N harvest index /%
处理 Treatment			分蘖盛期 Tillering		拔节期 Jointing		齐穗期 Full heading	成熟期 Maturity	稻谷产量 Grain yield /(kg·hm^-2)	氮素收获指数 N harvest index /%
D₁	N₀	12.21±1.11 e		31.21±2.30 e		81.04±3.19 e		99.96±1.77 e	8 141.23±57.93 d	75.16±0.19 a
	N₁	23.63±4.07 d		60.26±2.28 d		110.57±5.89 d		138.09±5.16 d	9 089.70±157.21 c	68.75±0.40 b
	N₂	27.91±5.31 c		67.09±1.43 c		119.75±6.95 c		149.88±1.99 c	9 377.61±119.61 b	67.42±0.95 c
	N₃	34.24±2.91 b		88.66±15.51 b		144.21±9.75 b		180.63±1.60 b	10 003.44±58.44 a	68.99±1.41 b
	N₄	39.34±2.14 a		96.88±10.69 a		153.86±5.37 a		193.95±2.76 a	10 057.76±17.78 a	67.85±1.08 bc
平均 Average		27.47±3.11		68.82±6.44		121.89±6.23		152.50±2.66	9 333.95±82.19	69.63±0.80
D₂	N₀	12.68±0.52 d		33.41±0.94 d		84.48±3.68 e		104.65±4.37 e	8 540.47±31.32 e	75.40±1.50 a
	N₁	23.64±1.23 c		60.48±1.51 c		112.11±3.02 d		145.68±5.81 d	9 697.88±33.90 d	70.23±1.97 b
	N₂	29.24±3.30 b		77.64±6.47 b		130.71±1.65 c		170.60±3.17 c	10 187.12±42.58 c	70.40±0.81 b
	N₃	40.52±3.37 a		104.67±6.00 a		162.20±9.94 a		203.94±5.48 a	11 463.85±49.39 a	68.24±1.40 c
	N₄	37.42±6.09 a		96.05±6.32 a		152.34±9.55 b		192.32±4.35 b	11 210.84±74.55 b	69.05±2.90 bc
平均 Average		28.70±2.90		74.45±4.25		128.37±5.56		163.44±4.64	10 220.03±46.35	70.66±1.72
D₃	N₀	8.39±0.25 d		26.09±3.28 d		73.12±8.19 e		90.46±5.72 e	8 005.77±11.92 e	74.88±1.52 a
	N₁	19.64±0.51 c		50.79±4.55 c		99.36±4.82 d		127.75±0.64 d	8 427.55±43.30 d	69.79±1.61 b
	N₂	25.74±2.86 b		57.70±6.16 c		109.54±4.46 c		139.22±7.02 c	9 002.07±48.45 c	69.36±0.95 b
	N₃	29.22±1.13 b		71.60±6.17 b		125.35±7.64 b		162.37±6.73 b	9 989.09±67.52 b	69.42±1.65 b
	N₄	36.47±2.47 a		86.62±6.62 a		140.98±4.19 a		180.14±7.26 a	10 732.01±61.01 a	69.33±2.36 b
平均 Average		23.89±1.44		58.56±5.36		109.67±5.86		139.99±5.48	9 231.30±46.44	70.56±1.62
F 值 F value	D	8.51^**		89.27^**		11.07^*		94.75^**	486.78^**	0.78
	N	129.10^**		172.30^**		249.42^**		515.65^**	2165.51^**	37.45^**
	D×N	1.63		2.79^*		3.44^**		6.09^**	74.82^**	0.96

处理 Treatment			氮素累积N accumulation/(kg·hm^-2)						稻谷产量 Grain yield /(kg·hm^-2)	氮素收获指数 N harvest index /%
处理 Treatment			分蘖盛期 Tillering		拔节期 Jointing		齐穗期 Full heading	成熟期 Maturity	稻谷产量 Grain yield /(kg·hm^-2)	氮素收获指数 N harvest index /%
D₁	N₀	12.21±1.11 e		31.21±2.30 e		81.04±3.19 e		99.96±1.77 e	8 141.23±57.93 d	75.16±0.19 a
	N₁	23.63±4.07 d		60.26±2.28 d		110.57±5.89 d		138.09±5.16 d	9 089.70±157.21 c	68.75±0.40 b
	N₂	27.91±5.31 c		67.09±1.43 c		119.75±6.95 c		149.88±1.99 c	9 377.61±119.61 b	67.42±0.95 c
	N₃	34.24±2.91 b		88.66±15.51 b		144.21±9.75 b		180.63±1.60 b	10 003.44±58.44 a	68.99±1.41 b
	N₄	39.34±2.14 a		96.88±10.69 a		153.86±5.37 a		193.95±2.76 a	10 057.76±17.78 a	67.85±1.08 bc
平均 Average		27.47±3.11		68.82±6.44		121.89±6.23		152.50±2.66	9 333.95±82.19	69.63±0.80
D₂	N₀	12.68±0.52 d		33.41±0.94 d		84.48±3.68 e		104.65±4.37 e	8 540.47±31.32 e	75.40±1.50 a
	N₁	23.64±1.23 c		60.48±1.51 c		112.11±3.02 d		145.68±5.81 d	9 697.88±33.90 d	70.23±1.97 b
	N₂	29.24±3.30 b		77.64±6.47 b		130.71±1.65 c		170.60±3.17 c	10 187.12±42.58 c	70.40±0.81 b
	N₃	40.52±3.37 a		104.67±6.00 a		162.20±9.94 a		203.94±5.48 a	11 463.85±49.39 a	68.24±1.40 c
	N₄	37.42±6.09 a		96.05±6.32 a		152.34±9.55 b		192.32±4.35 b	11 210.84±74.55 b	69.05±2.90 bc
平均 Average		28.70±2.90		74.45±4.25		128.37±5.56		163.44±4.64	10 220.03±46.35	70.66±1.72
D₃	N₀	8.39±0.25 d		26.09±3.28 d		73.12±8.19 e		90.46±5.72 e	8 005.77±11.92 e	74.88±1.52 a
	N₁	19.64±0.51 c		50.79±4.55 c		99.36±4.82 d		127.75±0.64 d	8 427.55±43.30 d	69.79±1.61 b
	N₂	25.74±2.86 b		57.70±6.16 c		109.54±4.46 c		139.22±7.02 c	9 002.07±48.45 c	69.36±0.95 b
	N₃	29.22±1.13 b		71.60±6.17 b		125.35±7.64 b		162.37±6.73 b	9 989.09±67.52 b	69.42±1.65 b
	N₄	36.47±2.47 a		86.62±6.62 a		140.98±4.19 a		180.14±7.26 a	10 732.01±61.01 a	69.33±2.36 b
平均 Average		23.89±1.44		58.56±5.36		109.67±5.86		139.99±5.48	9 231.30±46.44	70.56±1.62
F 值 F value	D	8.51^**		89.27^**		11.07^*		94.75^**	486.78^**	0.78
	N	129.10^**		172.30^**		249.42^**		515.65^**	2165.51^**	37.45^**
	D×N	1.63		2.79^*		3.44^**		6.09^**	74.82^**	0.96

处理 Treatment		氮素积累量 N accumulation amount/(kg·hm^-2)			氮素积累速率 N accumulation rate/(kg·hm^-2d^-1)
处理 Treatment		分蘖-拔节期 TS-JS	拔节-齐穗期 JS-FHS	齐穗-成熟期 FHS-MS	分蘖-拔节期 TS-JS	拔节-齐穗期 JS-FHS	齐穗-成熟期 FHS-MS
D₁	N₀	19.00±1.35 c	49.83±5.29 a	18.92±4.26 c	1.36±0.10 c	1.55±0.17 a	0.43±0.10 c
	N₁	36.63±5.54 b	50.31±8.16 a	27.52±2.91 b	2.62±0.40 b	1.48±0.24 a	0.62±0.07 b
	N₂	39.18±5.21 b	52.66±8.15 a	30.13±5.08 b	2.80±0.37 b	1.55±0.24 a	0.68±0.12 b
	N₃	54.43±13.84 a	55.55±12.60 a	36.41±11.28 a	3.89±0.99 a	1.54±0.35 a	0.83±0.26 a
	N₄	57.54±9.15 a	56.98±13.71 a	40.09±6.71 a	4.11±0.65 a	1.58±0.38 a	0.91±0.15 a
平均 Average		41.36±7.02	53.06±9.58	30.61±6.05	2.96±0.50	1.54±0.28	0.70±0.14
D₂	N₀	20.73±1.15 d	51.07±3.55 a	20.17±5.40 c	1.48±0.08 d	1.60±0.11 a	0.46±0.12 c
	N₁	36.84±2.72 c	51.62±1.72 a	33.57±3.84 ab	2.63±0.19 c	1.52±0.05 a	0.76±0.09 ab
	N₂	48.41±3.46 b	53.06±5.09 a	39.89±4.06 a	3.46±0.25 b	1.56±0.15 a	0.91±0.09 a
	N₃	64.15±4.96 a	57.54±13.76 a	41.74±4.52 a	4.58±0.35 a	1.60±0.38 a	0.95±0.10 a
	N₄	58.64±2.62 a	56.28±8.68 a	39.98±8.01 a	4.19±0.19 a	1.57±0.24 a	0.91±0.18 a
平均 Average		45.75±2.98	53.92±6.56	35.07±5.17	3.27±0.21	1.57±0.19	0.80±0.12
D₃	N₀	17.70±3.31 c	47.03±9.93 a	17.33±3.99 c	1.26±0.24 c	1.47±0.31 a	0.40±0.09 c
	N₁	31.15±4.04 b	48.57±0.29 a	28.39±5.46 b	2.23±0.29 b	1.43±0.01 a	0.65±0.12 b
	N₂	31.96±4.78 b	51.84±9.20 a	29.68±3.14 ab	2.28±0.34 b	1.52±0.27 a	0.67±0.07 ab
	N₃	42.38±5.76 a	53.76±8.26 a	37.02±3.56 a	3.03±0.41 a	1.49±0.23 a	0.84±0.08 a
	N₄	50.15±8.47 a	54.37±10.58 a	39.16±9.56 a	3.58±0.60 a	1.51±0.29 a	0.89±0.22 a
平均 Average		34.67±5.27	51.11±7.65	30.32±5.14	2.48±0.38	1.49±0.22	0.69±0.12
F 值 F value	D	44.11^**	0.23	2.53	45.47^**	0.25	2.56
	N	57.92^**	1.54	17.89^**	57.74^**	0.20	17.76^**
	D×N	1.42	0.03	0.41	1.42	0.03	0.42