中国水稻科学 ›› 2017, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 619-630.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2017.7014
吴越1,2, 胡静1,3, 陈琛1, 张家星1, 李万元1, 唐东南1, 仲军1, 羊彬1, 朱正康1, 姚友礼1, 王余龙1, 董桂春1,*()
收稿日期:
2017-02-06
修回日期:
2017-04-02
出版日期:
2017-11-25
发布日期:
2017-11-10
通讯作者:
董桂春
基金资助:
Yue WU1,2, Jing HU1,3, Chen CHEN1, Jiaxing ZHANG1, Wanyuan LI1, Dongnan TANG1, Jun ZHONG1, Bin YANG1, Zhengkang ZHU1, Youli YAO1, Yulong WANG1, Guichun DONG1,*()
Received:
2017-02-06
Revised:
2017-04-02
Online:
2017-11-25
Published:
2017-11-10
Contact:
Guichun DONG
摘要:
【目的】 为阐明江苏省早熟晚粳新品种氮素吸收与利用的品种差异及其影响因素,【方法】于2012-2013年在江苏(武进)水稻研究所,以江苏省新近育成的8个早熟晚粳稻为供试材料,研究其与对照在产量、氮素吸收、氮素利用上的差异,分析氮素吸收利用及影响因素。【结果】 1) 8个早熟晚粳新品种实收产量均高于对照宁粳1号,平均增加7.87%,其中,武运粳29、武运粳23、扬粳4227、通粳981极显著高于对照;新品种总吸氮量和氮素籽粒生产效率分别比对照平均增加4.97%、2.85%。随着品种吸氮量、氮素籽粒生产效率的提高,稻谷产量均增加;2)高产新品种干物质生产量高、吸氮强度大、单穗吸氮量多和抽穗后吸氮量多,导致总吸氮量多;3)高产新品种结实期茎鞘叶氮素转运量、转运率大,氮素比例下降值大,成熟期茎鞘叶氮素比例低,结实期穗氮素增加量大,成熟期穗氮素比例高,这些特征均有利于总吸氮量、氮素籽粒生产效率的提高,且对前者的促进作用明显大于后者;4)高产新品种氮素收获指数、氮肥吸收利用率、氮肥农学利用率、氮肥偏生产力等指标均高于对照,产量越高趋势越明显。总氮吸收量、氮素籽粒生产效率高的品种有利于氮素收获指数、氮肥农学利用率、氮肥偏生产力的提高,但前者的影响更大。吸氮量高的品种氮肥利用率也较高,氮素籽粒生产效率高的品种氮素干物质生产效率、氮肥生理利用率也高。【结论】 在苏南稻区,8个早熟晚粳新品种产量明显高于对照,氮肥(素)吸收利用率、总吸氮量、氮素籽粒生产效率均比对照表现出一定的优势。
中图分类号:
吴越, 胡静, 陈琛, 张家星, 李万元, 唐东南, 仲军, 羊彬, 朱正康, 姚友礼, 王余龙, 董桂春. 江苏省早熟晚粳高产水稻新品种氮素吸收利用特征及成因分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(6): 619-630.
Yue WU, Jing HU, Chen CHEN, Jiaxing ZHANG, Wanyuan LI, Dongnan TANG, Jun ZHONG, Bin YANG, Zhengkang ZHU, Youli YAO, Yulong WANG, Guichun DONG. Nitrogen Absorption and Utilization Characteristics of the Newly Approved Early-Maturity Late japonica Rice Cultivars in Jiangsu Province[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2017, 31(6): 619-630.
图1 不同高产新品种实收产量与理论产量差异按产量高低进行品种排序,依次为武运粳29、武运粳23、扬粳4227、通粳981、常农粳7号、宁粳3号、镇稻16、南粳5055和对照宁粳1号,分别用字母A、B、C、D、E、F、G、H、CK表示。下同。
Fig. 1. Harvest yield and theoretical yield of different high yielding varieties. The letters A, B, C, D, E,F, G, H and CK represent Wuyunjing 29, Wuyunjing 23, Yang 4227, Tongjing 981, Changnongjing 7, Ningjing 3, Zhendao 16, Nanjing 5055 and Ningjing 1, respectively according to their grain yield order from high to low. The same as in the following figures.
图2 不同高产新品种成熟期吸氮量、氮素籽粒生产效率的差异
Fig. 2. Nitrogen absorption per unit area and nitrogen use efficiency for grain output(NUEg) of different high yielding cultivars.
品种 Cultivar | 干物质生产量 Dry matter production | 吸氮量 Nitrogen absorption | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
抽穗期 | 抽穗后 | 抽穗期 | 抽穗后 | ||
Heading stage | Post-heading | Heading stage | Post-heading | ||
A | 1206.77 | 755.22 a | 16.83 | 4.31 a | |
B | 1203.99 | 743.89 a | 16.91 | 4.20 a | |
C | 1204.00 | 702.99 ab | 16.75 | 3.82 bc | |
D | 1180.68 | 658.75 abc | 16.44 | 3.47 bc | |
E | 1193.98 | 628.74 bc | 16.22 | 3.29 bc | |
F | 1156.14 | 618.95 bc | 16.24 | 3.18 bc | |
G | 1162.03 | 954.63 c | 16.16 | 2.98 c | |
H | 1142.74 | 591.50 c | 16.05 | 2.93 c | |
CK | 1145.73 | 591.80 c | 16.23 | 2.80 c | |
r | 0.535** | 0.808** | 0.592** | 0.718** | |
F值 F Value | 1.023 | 4.265** | 0.687 | 2.381* |
表1 不同高产新品种抽穗期、抽穗后干物质生产量和氮素吸收量的差异
Table 1 Differences of dry matter production and nitrogen absorption at heading and grain-filling period of different high yielding cultivars. g·m-2
品种 Cultivar | 干物质生产量 Dry matter production | 吸氮量 Nitrogen absorption | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
抽穗期 | 抽穗后 | 抽穗期 | 抽穗后 | ||
Heading stage | Post-heading | Heading stage | Post-heading | ||
A | 1206.77 | 755.22 a | 16.83 | 4.31 a | |
B | 1203.99 | 743.89 a | 16.91 | 4.20 a | |
C | 1204.00 | 702.99 ab | 16.75 | 3.82 bc | |
D | 1180.68 | 658.75 abc | 16.44 | 3.47 bc | |
E | 1193.98 | 628.74 bc | 16.22 | 3.29 bc | |
F | 1156.14 | 618.95 bc | 16.24 | 3.18 bc | |
G | 1162.03 | 954.63 c | 16.16 | 2.98 c | |
H | 1142.74 | 591.50 c | 16.05 | 2.93 c | |
CK | 1145.73 | 591.80 c | 16.23 | 2.80 c | |
r | 0.535** | 0.808** | 0.592** | 0.718** | |
F值 F Value | 1.023 | 4.265** | 0.687 | 2.381* |
品 种 Cultivar | 抽穗期 Heading stage | 全生育期 Whole growth duration |
---|---|---|
A | 159.01 ab | 131.95 a |
B | 161.63 ab | 135.45 a |
C | 165.01 a | 130.52 a |
D | 158.81 ab | 125.22 b |
E | 150.20 b | 121.79 bc |
F | 159.20 ab | 123.94 bc |
G | 154.85 ab | 120.78 bc |
H | 159.45 ab | 122.06 bc |
CK | 155.04 ab | 119.48 c |
r | 0.448* | 0.971* |
F值F value | 1.262 | 11.681** |
表2 不同高产新品种吸氮强度的差异
Table 2 Differences with nitrogen absorption rate of different high yielding cultivars. mg·m-2d-1
品 种 Cultivar | 抽穗期 Heading stage | 全生育期 Whole growth duration |
---|---|---|
A | 159.01 ab | 131.95 a |
B | 161.63 ab | 135.45 a |
C | 165.01 a | 130.52 a |
D | 158.81 ab | 125.22 b |
E | 150.20 b | 121.79 bc |
F | 159.20 ab | 123.94 bc |
G | 154.85 ab | 120.78 bc |
H | 159.45 ab | 122.06 bc |
CK | 155.04 ab | 119.48 c |
r | 0.448* | 0.971* |
F值F value | 1.262 | 11.681** |
品 种 Cultivar | 氮素干物质生产效率 Dry matter production efficiency/(g·g-1) | 氮收获指数 N harvest index/% | 氮肥吸收利用率 NRE/% | 氮肥生理利用率NPE/(g·g-1) | 氮肥农学利用率NAE/(g·g-1) | 氮肥偏生产力NPFP/(g·g-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 92.83 | 69.24 a | 42.90 a | 47.22 | 15.79 a | 39.03 a |
B | 92.30 | 68.58 ab | 42.73 a | 47.68 | 15.77 a | 38.81 ab |
C | 92.73 | 67.17 bc | 41.67 ab | 46.96 | 15.40 ab | 37.26 bc |
D | 92.44 | 66.24 c | 40.74 ab | 46.43 | 14.92 ab | 35.85 cd |
E | 92.99 | 65.34 cd | 40.16 ab | 46.35 | 14.65 ab | 34.98 de |
F | 91.81 | 62.96 e | 39.27 ab | 46.77 | 14.30 a | 34.90 de |
G | 91.76 | 62.98 e | 39.05 ab | 46.33 | 14.17 ab | 34.15 de |
H | 91.20 | 63.89 de | 38.01 b | 46.99 | 14.05 b | 33.62 e |
CK | 91.25 | 62.95 e | 39.21 ab | 44.98 | 13.90 b | 33.44 e |
r吸 | 0.13 | 0.804** | 0.776** | –0.02 | 0.738** | 0.909** |
r籽 | 0.512* | 0.520* | 0.098 | 0.754** | 0.766** | 0.720** |
F值F vaule | 0.673 | 15.239** | 2.001 | 0.143 | 2.205 | 15.875** |
表3 不同高产新品种成熟期其他氮素利用效率的差异
Table 3 Differences of nitrogen use efficiency of different high yielding cultivars.
品 种 Cultivar | 氮素干物质生产效率 Dry matter production efficiency/(g·g-1) | 氮收获指数 N harvest index/% | 氮肥吸收利用率 NRE/% | 氮肥生理利用率NPE/(g·g-1) | 氮肥农学利用率NAE/(g·g-1) | 氮肥偏生产力NPFP/(g·g-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 92.83 | 69.24 a | 42.90 a | 47.22 | 15.79 a | 39.03 a |
B | 92.30 | 68.58 ab | 42.73 a | 47.68 | 15.77 a | 38.81 ab |
C | 92.73 | 67.17 bc | 41.67 ab | 46.96 | 15.40 ab | 37.26 bc |
D | 92.44 | 66.24 c | 40.74 ab | 46.43 | 14.92 ab | 35.85 cd |
E | 92.99 | 65.34 cd | 40.16 ab | 46.35 | 14.65 ab | 34.98 de |
F | 91.81 | 62.96 e | 39.27 ab | 46.77 | 14.30 a | 34.90 de |
G | 91.76 | 62.98 e | 39.05 ab | 46.33 | 14.17 ab | 34.15 de |
H | 91.20 | 63.89 de | 38.01 b | 46.99 | 14.05 b | 33.62 e |
CK | 91.25 | 62.95 e | 39.21 ab | 44.98 | 13.90 b | 33.44 e |
r吸 | 0.13 | 0.804** | 0.776** | –0.02 | 0.738** | 0.909** |
r籽 | 0.512* | 0.520* | 0.098 | 0.754** | 0.766** | 0.720** |
F值F vaule | 0.673 | 15.239** | 2.001 | 0.143 | 2.205 | 15.875** |
品 种 Cultivar | 茎鞘叶吸氮比例 N in stem and leaf | 穗吸氮比例 N in panicle | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
抽穗期 Heading | 成熟期 Maturity | 抽穗期到成熟期的下降值 Decline from heading to maturity | 抽穗期 Heading | 成熟期 Maturity | 抽穗期到成熟期的增加值 Added value from heading to maturity | ||
A | 90.51 a | 30.76 e | 59.75 a | 9.49 b | 69.24 a | 59.75 a | |
B | 90.14 b | 31.42 de | 58.72 ab | 9.86 ab | 68.58 ab | 58.72 ab | |
C | 89.98 ab | 32.83 cd | 57.15 bc | 10.02 ab | 67.17 bc | 57.15 bc | |
D | 90.17 ab | 33.76 c | 56.41 bc | 9.83 ab | 66.24 c | 56.41 cd | |
E | 89.77 ab | 34.66 bc | 55.11 cd | 10.23 ab | 65.34 cd | 55.11 cde | |
F | 90.51 a | 37.04 a | 53.47 de | 9.49 b | 62.96 e | 53.48 ef | |
G | 89.14 ab | 37.02 a | 52.12 e | 10.86 a | 62.98 e | 52.12 f | |
H | 90.31 a | 36.11 ab | 54.20 cd | 9.69 b | 63.89 de | 54.20 f | |
CK | 89.77 ab | 37.05 a | 47.72 de | 10.23 ab | 62.95 e | 52.71 f | |
r吸 | 0.242 | –0.803** | 0.790** | –0.253 | 0.803** | 0.790** | |
r籽 | 0.358 | –0.520** | 0.556** | –0.368 | 0.520** | 0.557** | |
F值F vaule | 1.787 | 15.239** | 9.892** | 1.802 | 15.239** | 13.087** |
表4 不同高产新品种在不同器官中氮素分配比例的变化
Table 4 Differences of nitrogen absorption and distribution ratio of different high yielding cultivars. %
品 种 Cultivar | 茎鞘叶吸氮比例 N in stem and leaf | 穗吸氮比例 N in panicle | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
抽穗期 Heading | 成熟期 Maturity | 抽穗期到成熟期的下降值 Decline from heading to maturity | 抽穗期 Heading | 成熟期 Maturity | 抽穗期到成熟期的增加值 Added value from heading to maturity | ||
A | 90.51 a | 30.76 e | 59.75 a | 9.49 b | 69.24 a | 59.75 a | |
B | 90.14 b | 31.42 de | 58.72 ab | 9.86 ab | 68.58 ab | 58.72 ab | |
C | 89.98 ab | 32.83 cd | 57.15 bc | 10.02 ab | 67.17 bc | 57.15 bc | |
D | 90.17 ab | 33.76 c | 56.41 bc | 9.83 ab | 66.24 c | 56.41 cd | |
E | 89.77 ab | 34.66 bc | 55.11 cd | 10.23 ab | 65.34 cd | 55.11 cde | |
F | 90.51 a | 37.04 a | 53.47 de | 9.49 b | 62.96 e | 53.48 ef | |
G | 89.14 ab | 37.02 a | 52.12 e | 10.86 a | 62.98 e | 52.12 f | |
H | 90.31 a | 36.11 ab | 54.20 cd | 9.69 b | 63.89 de | 54.20 f | |
CK | 89.77 ab | 37.05 a | 47.72 de | 10.23 ab | 62.95 e | 52.71 f | |
r吸 | 0.242 | –0.803** | 0.790** | –0.253 | 0.803** | 0.790** | |
r籽 | 0.358 | –0.520** | 0.556** | –0.368 | 0.520** | 0.557** | |
F值F vaule | 1.787 | 15.239** | 9.892** | 1.802 | 15.239** | 13.087** |
品 种 Cultivar | 茎鞘叶吸氮量 N in stem and leaf/(g·m-2) | 穗吸氮量N in panicle/(g·m-2) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
抽穗期Heading | 成熟期 Maturity | 氮素转运量 Nitrogen translocation | 转运率 Nitrogen translocation ratio/% | 抽穗期Heading | 成熟期Maturity | 氮素增加量 Nitrogen translocation | 增加率 Nitrogen translocation ratio/% | ||
A | 15.23 | 6.50 c | 8.74 a | 57.36 a | 14.64 ab | 1.60 a | 13.04 a | 89.10 a | |
B | 15.25 | 6.61 bc | 8.64 ab | 56.65 ab | 14.50 ab | 1.66 a | 12.84 a | 88.58 ab | |
C | 15.07 | 6.75 abc | 8.31 abc | 55.18 abc | 13.81 ab | 1.68 b | 12.13 b | 87.82 abc | |
D | 14.82 | 6.71 abc | 8.10 abc | 54.69 abcd | 13.19 ab | 1.62 c | 11.57 c | 87.70 abc | |
E | 14.55 | 6.77 abc | 7.79 abc | 53.51 abcd | 12.74 ab | 1.67 cd | 11.07 cd | 86.89 cd | |
F | 14.68 | 7.17 a | 7.51 bc | 51.16 cd | 12.26 b | 1.56 e | 10.69 de | 87.25 bcd | |
G | 14.39 | 7.09 ab | 7.30 abc | 50.72 d | 12.06 a | 1.78 de | 10.28 de | 85.27 e | |
H | 14.47 | 6.83 abc | 7.64 c | 52.79 bcd | 12.15 b | 1.58 e | 10.57 e | 87.02 cd | |
CK | 14.56 | 7.03 ab | 7.53 bc | 51.70 cd | 11.99 ab | 1.67 de | 10.32 e | 86.08 e | |
r吸 | 0.609** | –0.317 | 0.667** | 0.622** | –0.060 | 0.959** | 0.946** | 0.692** | |
r籽 | 0.416* | –0.488* | 0.577** | 0.619** | –0.174 | 0.463* | 0.478* | 0.470* | |
F值 F value | 0.823 | 2.031 | 2.261 | 3.616* | 1.275 | 27.359** | 28.639** | 6.481** |
表5 不同高产新品种结实期氮素转运的差异
Table 5 Difference of nitrogen translocation at maturity in different high yielding cultivars.
品 种 Cultivar | 茎鞘叶吸氮量 N in stem and leaf/(g·m-2) | 穗吸氮量N in panicle/(g·m-2) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
抽穗期Heading | 成熟期 Maturity | 氮素转运量 Nitrogen translocation | 转运率 Nitrogen translocation ratio/% | 抽穗期Heading | 成熟期Maturity | 氮素增加量 Nitrogen translocation | 增加率 Nitrogen translocation ratio/% | ||
A | 15.23 | 6.50 c | 8.74 a | 57.36 a | 14.64 ab | 1.60 a | 13.04 a | 89.10 a | |
B | 15.25 | 6.61 bc | 8.64 ab | 56.65 ab | 14.50 ab | 1.66 a | 12.84 a | 88.58 ab | |
C | 15.07 | 6.75 abc | 8.31 abc | 55.18 abc | 13.81 ab | 1.68 b | 12.13 b | 87.82 abc | |
D | 14.82 | 6.71 abc | 8.10 abc | 54.69 abcd | 13.19 ab | 1.62 c | 11.57 c | 87.70 abc | |
E | 14.55 | 6.77 abc | 7.79 abc | 53.51 abcd | 12.74 ab | 1.67 cd | 11.07 cd | 86.89 cd | |
F | 14.68 | 7.17 a | 7.51 bc | 51.16 cd | 12.26 b | 1.56 e | 10.69 de | 87.25 bcd | |
G | 14.39 | 7.09 ab | 7.30 abc | 50.72 d | 12.06 a | 1.78 de | 10.28 de | 85.27 e | |
H | 14.47 | 6.83 abc | 7.64 c | 52.79 bcd | 12.15 b | 1.58 e | 10.57 e | 87.02 cd | |
CK | 14.56 | 7.03 ab | 7.53 bc | 51.70 cd | 11.99 ab | 1.67 de | 10.32 e | 86.08 e | |
r吸 | 0.609** | –0.317 | 0.667** | 0.622** | –0.060 | 0.959** | 0.946** | 0.692** | |
r籽 | 0.416* | –0.488* | 0.577** | 0.619** | –0.174 | 0.463* | 0.478* | 0.470* | |
F值 F value | 0.823 | 2.031 | 2.261 | 3.616* | 1.275 | 27.359** | 28.639** | 6.481** |
y | x | 直接通径系数 | x与y的相关系数 |
---|---|---|---|
Indirect path coefficient | Correlation coefficient of x and y | ||
成熟期吸氮量 N absorption at maturity | 抽穗期吸氮量N absorption at heading stage | 0.703 | 0.592** |
抽穗后吸氮量N absorption during grain-filling period | 0.813 | 0.718** | |
成熟期干物质生产量Dry matter productions at maturity | 1.089 | 0.964** | |
成熟期全株含氮率Nitrogen content of whole plant at maturity | 0.320 | –0.183 | |
成熟期单穗吸氮量N absorption per panicle at maturity | 1.640 | 0.807** | |
穗数Panicle number | 1.016 | –0.331 | |
成熟期群体吸氮强度N absorption rate at maturity | 1.024 | 0.971** | |
全生育期天数Days from sowing to maturity | 0.244 | 0.022 |
表6 不同高产新品种吸氮量构成因子对成熟期吸氮量的通径分析
Table 6 Path analysis for the components determining nitrogen absorption at maturity of different high yielding cultivars.
y | x | 直接通径系数 | x与y的相关系数 |
---|---|---|---|
Indirect path coefficient | Correlation coefficient of x and y | ||
成熟期吸氮量 N absorption at maturity | 抽穗期吸氮量N absorption at heading stage | 0.703 | 0.592** |
抽穗后吸氮量N absorption during grain-filling period | 0.813 | 0.718** | |
成熟期干物质生产量Dry matter productions at maturity | 1.089 | 0.964** | |
成熟期全株含氮率Nitrogen content of whole plant at maturity | 0.320 | –0.183 | |
成熟期单穗吸氮量N absorption per panicle at maturity | 1.640 | 0.807** | |
穗数Panicle number | 1.016 | –0.331 | |
成熟期群体吸氮强度N absorption rate at maturity | 1.024 | 0.971** | |
全生育期天数Days from sowing to maturity | 0.244 | 0.022 |
[1] | 张洪程, 马群, 杨雄, 李敏, 葛梦婕, 李国业, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 高辉, 刘艳阳.水稻品种氮肥群体最高生产力及其增长规律. 作物学报, 2012, 38(1): 86-98. |
Zhang H C, Ma Q, Yang X, Li M, Ge M J, Li G Y, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Gao H, Liu Y Y.The highest population productivity of nitrogen fertilization and its variation rules in rice cultivars.Acta Agron Sin, 2012, 38(1): 86-98. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 董桂春, 王余龙, 张岳芳, 陈培峰, 杨连新, 黄建晔. 籼稻品种间氮素吸收利用的差异及其对产量的影响. 作物学报, 2007, 33(1): 43-49. |
Dong G C, Wang Y L, Zhang Y F, Chen P F, Yang L X, Huang J Y.Main index of source and sink in nitrogen use efficiency for grain output in conventional indica rice cultivars.Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33(1): 43-49. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 陈琛, 王熠, 羊彬, 朱正康, 曹文雅, 罗刚, 周娟, 王祥菊, 于小凤, 袁秋梅, 仲军, 姚友礼, 黄建晔, 王余龙, 董桂春. 株高对遗传群体水稻株系氮素吸收利用的影响.中国农业科学, 2015, 48(22): 4450-4459. |
Chen C, Wang Y,), Yang B, Zhu Z K, Cao W Y, Luo G, Zhou J, Wang X J, Yu X F, Yuan Q M, Zhong J, Yao Y L, Huang J Y, Wang Y L, Dong G C.Plant height affects nitrogen absorption and utilization in rice with similar genetic background.Sci Agric Sin, 2015, 48(22):4450-4459(in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[4] | 董桂春, 王余龙, 张岳芳, 陈培峰, 杨连新, 黄建晔. 影响常规籼稻品种氮素籽粒生产效率的主要源库指标. 作物学报, 2006, 32(10): 1511-1518. |
Dong G C, Wang Y L, Zhang Y F, Chen P F, Yang L X, Huang J Y.Study on the fundamental traits of yield and yield components in conventional indica rice cultivars with different nitrogen use efficiency for grain output.Acta Agron Sin, 2006, 32(10):1511-1518(in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[5] | 薛亚光. 水稻高产与养分高效利用栽培技术及其生理基础的研究. 扬州:扬州大学, 2013. |
Xue Y G.Cultivation Techniques for High Yielding and High Nutrient Use Efficiency in Rice and Their Physiological Bases. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2013. | |
[6] | 郎有忠, 窦永秀, 王美娥, 王美娥, 张祖建, 朱庆森等. 水稻生育期对籽粒产量及品质的影响. 作物学报, 2012, 38(3): 528-534. |
Lang Y Z, Dou Y X, Wang M E, Zhang Z J, Zhu Q S.Effects of growth duration on grain yield and quality in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Acta Agron Sin, 2012, 38(3): 528-534. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 董明辉, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 孟立明. 植物养分利用效率研究综述. 扬州大学学报:农业与生命科学版, 2002, 23(4): 43-46. |
Dong M H, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Meng L M.Research on the nitrogen absorption and utilization of different rice varieties.J Yangzhou Univ: Agric & Life Sci Edn, 2002, 23(4): 43-46 (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 朴钟泽, 韩龙植, 高熙宗.水稻不同基因型氮素利用效率差异.中国水稻科学, 2003, 17(3): 233-238. |
Piao Z Z, Han L Z, Koh H J.Variations of nitrogen use efficiency by rice genotype.Chin J Rice Sci, 2003, 17(3): 233-238(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 董桂春. 不同氮素籽粒生产效率类型籼稻品种的基本特点. 扬州:扬州大学, 2007. |
Dong G C.Basic characteristics of Indica rice cultivars with different types of nitrogen use efficiency for grain output. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2007. | |
[10] | Inthapanya P, Sihavong P, Sihathep V, Chanhphengsay M, Fukai S, Basnayake J.Genotype differences in nutrient uptake and utilization for grain yield production of rain fed lowland rice under fertilized and non fertilized conditions.Field Crops Res, 2000,65: 57-68 |
[11] | 张岳芳, 王余龙, 张传胜, 董桂春, 杨连新, 黄建晔, 龙银成. 水稻的源库关系及碳、氮代谢的研究进展. 作物学报, 2006, 32(08): 1121-1129. |
Zhang Y F, Wang Y L, Zhang C S, Dong G C, Yang L X, Huang J Y, Long Y C. Relationship between N accumulation and root traits in conventional Indica rice varieties (Oryza sativa L.). Acta Agron Sin , 2006, 32(08):1121-1129(in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[12] | Isfan D, Csemi I, Tabi M.Genetic variation of the physiological efficiency index of nitrogen in triticale.J Plant nutr, 1991, 14(12):1381-1390. |
[13] | Tirol-Padre A, Ladha J K, Singh U, Laureles E, Punzalan G.Grain yield performance of rice genotypes at suboptimal levels of soil N as affected by N uptake and utilization efficiency.Field Crops Res, 1996, 46:127-143. |
[14] | 单玉华, 王余龙, 山本由德, 黄建晔, 董桂春, 杨连新, 张传胜, 居静. 不同水稻基因型对氮肥反应的差异及氮素利用效率的研究. 江苏农业研究, 2001, 22(1): 12-15. |
Shan Y H, Wang Y L, Yamamoto Y, Huang J Y, Dong G C, Yang L X, Zhang C S, Ju J.Genotypic differences of nitro gen use efficiency in various types of indica rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Jiangsu Agric Res, 2001, 22(1): 12-15(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 单玉华, 王余龙, 山本由德, 黄建晔, 杨连新, 张传胜. 不同类型水稻在氮素吸收及利用上的差异. 扬州大学学报:自然科学版, 2001, 4(3): 42-45. |
Shan Y H, Wang Y L, Yamamoto Y, Huang J Y, Yang L X, Zhang C S.Study on the differences of nitrogen uptake and use efficiency in different types of rice.J Yangzhou Univ: Nat Sci Edn, 2001, 4(3): 42-45(in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[16] | Singh U, Ladha J K, Castillo E G, Punzalan G, Tirol-Padre A, Duqueza M.Genotypic variation in nitrogen use efficiency in medium- and long-duration rice.Field Crops Res, 1998, 58: 35-53. |
[17] | 董桂春, 李进前, 张彪, 周娟, 张传胜, 张岳芳, 杨连新, 黄建晔, 王余龙. 高氮素籽粒生产效率类型籼稻品种的一些相关性状. 中国水稻科学, 2009, 23(03): 289-296. |
Dong G C, Li J Q, Zhang B, Zhou J, Zhang C S, Zhang Y F, Yang L X, Huang J Y, Wang Y L.Some related traits in conventional Indica rice cultivars with high nitrogen use efficiency for grain yield.Chin J Rice Sci, 2009, 23(03): 289 296(in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[18] | 殷春渊, 张庆, 魏海燕, 张洪成, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许珂, 马群, 杭杰, 张胜飞. 不同产量类型水稻基因型氮素吸收、利用效率的差异.中国农业科学, 2010, 43(1): 39-50. |
Yin C Y, Zhang Q, Wei H Y, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Ma Q, Hang J, Zhang S F.Differences in nitrogen absorption and use efficiency in rice genotypes with different yield performance.Sci Agric Sin, 2010, 43(01): 39 50(in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[19] | 王伟妮, 鲁剑巍, 鲁明星, 李小坤, 李云春, 李慧. 早、中、晚稻施氮增产效应及氮肥利用率研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011, 17(3): 545-553. |
Wang W N, Luo J W, Luo M X, Li X K, Li Y C, Li H, Sutdy on effect of nitrogen fertilizer and nitrogen use efficiency of early, mid and late season rice.Plant Nut Fert Sci, 2011, 17(3): 545-553(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 于小凤. 氮素高效吸收型水稻的基本特点. 扬州:扬州大学, 2012. |
Yu X F.Fundamental characteristics of conventional Japonica rice cultivars with high nitrogen uptake efficiency. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2012. | |
[21] | 张岳芳. 不同氮素累积量类型籼稻品种的基本特点及其对供氮浓度的响应. 扬州:扬州大学, 2006. |
Zhang Y F.Fundamental Traits of Indica Rice Varieties (Oryza sativa L.) with Different Nitrogen Accumulation Capacity and Its Responses to Nitrogen Supplying Levels. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2006. | |
[22] | 江立庚, 戴廷波, 韦善清, 甘秀芹, 徐建云, 曹卫星. 南方水稻氮素吸收与利用效率的基因型差异及评价. 植物生态学报, 2003, 27(4): 466-471. |
Jiang L G, Dai T B, Wei S Q, GanX Q, Xu J Y, Cao W X. Genotypic differences and valuation in nitrogen uptake and utilization efficiency in rice.Acta Phytoecol Sin, 2003, 27(4):466-471(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 陈琛, 羊彬, 朱正康, 曹文雅, 罗刚, 周娟, 王祥菊, 于小凤, 袁秋梅, 仲军, 王熠, 黄建晔, 王余龙, 董桂春. 影响水稻遗传群体株系氮素高效吸收的主要根系性状.中国水稻科学, 2015, 29(4): 390-398. |
Chen C, Yang B, Zhu Z K, Cao W Y, Luo G, Zhou J, Wang X J, Yu X F, Yuan Q M, Zhong J, Wang Y, Huang J Y, Wang Y L, Dong G C.Root traints affecting nitrogen efficient absorption in rice genetic populations.China J Rice Sci, 2015, 29(4):390 398 (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[24] | 王海候. 水稻氮素吸收利用与稻株重要农艺性状的关系. 扬州:扬州大学, 2005. |
Wang H H.Relationship between nitrogen uptake & utilization and important agronomic characters in rice(Oyrza Satvia L.) Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2005. | |
[25] | 董桂春, 于小凤, 赵江宁, 居静, 田昊, 李进前, 张燕, 王余龙. 不同穗型常规籼稻品种氦素吸收利用的基本特点. 作物学报, 2009, 35(11): 2091-2100. |
Dong G C, Yu X F, Zhao J N, Ju J, Tian H, Li J Q, Zhang Y, Wang Y L.General Characteristics of Nitrogen Uptake and Utilization in Conventional Indica Rice Cultivars with Different Panicle Weight Types.Acta Agron Sin, 2009,35(11): 2091-2100. | |
[26] | 周娟, 李进前, 张彪, 张传胜, 张岳芳, 王余龙, 董桂春. 不同氮素籽粒生产效率类型籼稻品种氮素吸收利用的差异. 安徽农业科学, 2008, 36(36): 15805-15808. |
Zhou J, Li J Q, Zhang B, Zhang C S, Zhang Y F, Wang Y L, Dong G C.Difference of nitrogen uptake and utilization in indica rice cultivars with different nitrogen use efficiency types for grain output.J Anhui Agric Sci, 2008, 36(36): 15805-15808(in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[27] | 王志琴, 李国生, 杨建昌, 刘立军, 郎有忠, 朱庆森. 江苏现用主要粳稻品种对氮素的反应. 江苏农业研究, 2000, 21(4): 22-26. |
Wang Z Q, Li G S, Yang J C, LiuL J, Lang Y Z, Zhu Q S. Responses of the main mid season japonica rice cultivars currently cultivated in Jiangsu to nitrogen applications.J Jiangsu Agric Res, 2000, 21(4): 22-26 (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[28] | 严小龙, 张福锁. 植物营养遗传学. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1997: 30-44. |
Yan X L, Zhang F S. Plant Nutrient Genetic.Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1997: 30-44(in Chinese) | |
[29] | Broadbent F E, De Datta S K, Laureles E V. Measurement of nitrogen utilization efficiency in rice genotypes.Agron J, 1987, 79:786-791. |
[30] | De Datta S K, Broadbent F E.Nitrogetruse efficiency of 24 rice genotypes on N- deficient soil.Field Crops Res, 1990,23:81-92. |
[31] | Ladha J K, Gjd K, Bennett J, Peng S, Reddy C K, Reddy P M.Opportunities for increased nitrogen-use efficiency from improved lowland rice germplasm.Field Crops Res, 1998,56:4-11. |
[32] | Heffer P.. Assessment of Fertilizer Use by Crop at the Global Level:2006/07-2007/08. Paris: International Fertilizer Industry Association.2009. . |
[33] | Ntanos D A, Koutroubas S D.Dry matter and N accumulation and translocation for indica and japonica rice under Mediterranean conditions.Field Crops Res, 2002, 74(1): 93-101. |
[34] | Jiang L G, Dai T B, Jiang D, Cao W X, Gan X Q, Wei S Q.Charactering physiological N-use efficiency as influenced by nitrogen management in three rice cultivars.Field Crops Res, 2004,88(2/3): 239-250. |
[35] | 董桂春, 于小凤, 董燕萍, 李进前, 田昊, 周娟, 王云霞, 杨连新, 黄建晔, 王余龙. 不同库容量类型常规籼稻品种氮素吸收与分配的差异. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(10):3432-3441. |
Dong G C, Yu X F, Dong Y P, LI J Q, Tian H, Zhou J, Wang Y X, Yang L X, Huang J Y, Wang Y L.A Difference in Nitrogen Uptake and Distribution in Conventional Indica Rice Cultivars with Different Sink Potentials.Sci Agric Sin, 2009, 42(10):3432-3441(in Chinese with English abstract). |
[1] | 刘慧敏, 周杰强, 胡远艺, 田妍, 雷斌, 李建武, 魏中伟, 唐文帮. 水稻小粒不育系新组合卓两优1126的高产特征[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(2): 160-171. |
[2] | 吴玉红, 李艳华, 王吕, 秦宇航, 李杉杉, 郝兴顺, 张庆路, 崔月贞, 肖飞. 陕南稻区紫云英稻草联合还田配施减量氮肥协同提升水稻产量与稻米品质[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(6): 628-641. |
[3] | 董立强, 杨铁鑫, 李睿, 商文奇, 马亮, 李跃东, 隋国民. 株行距配置对超高产田水稻产量及根系形态生理特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 392-404. |
[4] | 魏晓东, 张亚东, 宋雪梅, 陈涛, 朱镇, 赵庆勇, 赵凌, 路凯, 梁文化, 赫磊, 黄胜东, 谢寅峰, 王才林. 高产粳稻品种南粳晶谷的光合生理特性研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(6): 611-622. |
[5] | 张小祥, 邵士梅, 赵步洪, 张耗, 季红娟, 肖宁, 潘存红, 李育红, 吴云雨, 蔡跃, 刘建菊, 吉春明, 张秀琴, 刘广青, 周长海, 黄年生, 李爱宏. 氮肥减施模式对不同穗型迟熟中粳水稻产量及氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(3): 278-294. |
[6] | 孙园园, 张桥, 孙永健, 唐源, 郭长春, 刘芳艳, 武云霞, 杨志远, 马均. 不同育秧方式下播种量和插秧机具对机插稻氮素利用和产量的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(6): 595-605. |
[7] | 王亚梁, 朱德峰, 陈惠哲, 张玉屏, 向镜, 王志刚, 张义凯. 籼粳杂交稻精准条播育秧机插减氮增产的效应研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(5): 495-502. |
[8] | 张庆, 胡雅杰, 郭保卫, 张洪程, 徐晓杰, 徐玉峰, 朱邦辉, 徐洁芬, 钮中一, 凃荣文. 太湖地区优良食味高产软米粳稻品种特征研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(3): 279-290. |
[9] | 周娟, 舒小伟, 赖上坤, 许高平, 黄建晔, 姚友礼, 杨连新, 董桂春, 王余龙. 不同类型水稻品种产量和氮素吸收利用对大气CO2浓度升高响应的差异[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(6): 561-573. |
[10] | 彭志芸, 向开宏, 杨志远, 唐源, 谌洁, 张宇杰, 何艳, 严田蓉, 孙永健, 马均. 麦/油-稻轮作下秸秆还田与氮肥管理对直播杂交稻氮素利用特征的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(1): 57-68. |
[11] | 晏军, 吴启侠, 朱建强, 张露萍. 适雨灌溉下氮肥运筹对水稻光合特性、氮素吸收及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(4): 347-356. |
[12] | 胡雅杰, 吴培, 朱明, 邢志鹏, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 郭保卫, 张洪程. 钵苗机插水稻氮素吸收与利用特征[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 32(3): 257-264. |
[13] | 梁健, 赵晨, 韩超, 任红茹, 陈梦云, 张洪程, 霍中洋. 淮北地区氮高效高产型粳稻品种群体生长特征研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(4): 409-416. |
[14] | 孟天瑶, 李晓芸, 李超, 韦还和, 史天宇, 马荣荣, 王晓燕, 杨筠文, 戴其根, 张洪程. 甬优系列籼粳杂交稻中熟高产品系的株型特征[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2016, 30(2): 170-180. |
[15] | 陈琛, 羊彬, 朱正康, 曹文雅, 罗刚, 周娟, 王祥菊, 于小凤, 袁秋梅, 仲军, 王熠, 黄建晔, 王余龙, 董桂春. 影响水稻遗传群体株系氮素高效吸收的主要根系性状[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2015, 29(4): 390-398. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||