中国水稻科学 ›› 2017, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (4): 391-399.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2017.6146 391
秦俭1,2, 杨志远2, 孙永健2, 徐徽2, 吕腾飞2, 代邹2, 郑家奎1, 蒋开锋1, 马均2,*()
收稿日期:
2016-11-06
修回日期:
2017-02-12
出版日期:
2017-07-25
发布日期:
2017-07-10
通讯作者:
马均
基金资助:
Jian QIN1,2, Zhiyuan YANG2, Yongjian SUN2, Hui XU2, Tengfei LÜ2, Zou DAI2, Jiakui ZHENG1, Kaifeng JIANG1, Jun MA2,*()
Received:
2016-11-06
Revised:
2017-02-12
Online:
2017-07-25
Published:
2017-07-10
Contact:
Jun MA
摘要:
目的为探究氮素穗肥不同促花肥和保花肥比例对水稻光合生产和产量的影响,并为水稻氮素穗肥管理提供依据,【方法】以株型和产量均存在较大差异的2个杂交中稻品种(德香4103和宜香3724)为材料,在常规施氮量(180 kg/hm2)下,研究了占总氮40%的穗肥不同促花肥和保花肥运筹比例(1∶3, 2∶2, 3∶1, 4∶0)对水稻叶片生长、形态、光合生产及产量的影响。结果2个水稻品种均在低促花肥、高保花肥时(1∶3)表现出叶片直立、受光形态好,净光合速率高和群体干物质积累量大的特点,并最终获得较高产量;而在高促花肥、低保花肥下,2个水稻品种的剑叶、倒2叶叶面积和叶角增大,披垂度增加,群体质量变差,结实率和粒重下降,产量降低。德香4103因其颖花量较大,上3叶叶面积和总叶面积相对适宜,粒叶比高,且在不同穗肥运筹下叶面积和叶角变幅较小,因而受光姿态和群体质量更优,干物质积累量更大,产量更高。结论水稻氮素穗肥运筹应塑造良好叶片形态和群体质量,并增加花后物质积累量才能有助于产量提高;并对水稻株叶型选育进行了探讨。
中图分类号:
秦俭, 杨志远, 孙永健, 徐徽, 吕腾飞, 代邹, 郑家奎, 蒋开锋, 马均. 氮素穗肥运筹对两个杂交中籼稻叶片形态、光合生产及产量的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(4): 391-399.
Jian QIN, Zhiyuan YANG, Yongjian SUN, Hui XU, Tengfei LÜ, Zou DAI, Jiakui ZHENG, Kaifeng JIANG, Jun MA. Effects of Nitrogen Topdressing for Panicle Initiation on Leaf Morphology, Photosynthetic Production and Grain Yield of Two Middle-season Hybrid Rice[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2017, 31(4): 391-399.
全氮 Total N content/(g·kg-1) | 有机质 Organic matter/(g·kg-1) | 碱解氮 Available N content/(g·kg-1) | 速效磷 Available P content/(g·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available K content/(g·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1.76 | 29.15 | 157.54 | 39.81 | 80.65 |
表 1 试验田土壤基础肥力
Table 1 . Basic soil fertility of the experimental field.
全氮 Total N content/(g·kg-1) | 有机质 Organic matter/(g·kg-1) | 碱解氮 Available N content/(g·kg-1) | 速效磷 Available P content/(g·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available K content/(g·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1.76 | 29.15 | 157.54 | 39.81 | 80.65 |
品种 Cultivar | 穗肥处理 Nitrogen application for panicle initiation | 剑叶 Flag leaf | 倒2叶 2nd leaf from top | 倒3叶 3rd leaf from top | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
长 Length/cm | 宽 Width/cm | 面积 Area/cm2 | 长 Length/cm | 宽 Width/cm | 面积 Area/cm2 | 长 Length/cm | 宽 Width/cm | 面积 Area/cm2 | |||||
C1 | N1 | 35.0 b | 2.5 a | 61.3 d | 44.4 a | 2.3 a | 71.5 b | 48.6 a | 2.0 a | 67.9 b | |||
N2 | 35.3 b | 2.6 a | 64.2 c | 44.6 a | 2.3 a | 71.8 b | 48.4 a | 2.0 a | 67.8 b | ||||
N3 | 38.9 a | 2.6 a | 70.8 b | 45.4 a | 2.3 a | 73.1 ab | 48.4 a | 2.0 a | 67.8 b | ||||
N4 | 39.4 a | 2.7 a | 74.5 a | 45.4 a | 2.4 a | 76.3 a | 48.4 a | 2.1 a | 71.1 a | ||||
平均值Average | 37.1 | 2.6 | 67.7 | 44.5 | 2.3 | 73.2 | 48.4 | 2.0 | 68.7 | ||||
C2 | N1 | 36.8 c | 2.4 a | 61.8 c | 51.5 b | 2.2 a | 79.3 c | 55.1 a | 2.0 a | 77.1 a | |||
N2 | 40.5 b | 2.5 a | 70.9 b | 51.9 b | 2.3 a | 83.6 b | 55.9 a | 2.0 a | 78.3 a | ||||
N3 | 40.5 b | 2.5 a | 70.9 b | 52.2 ab | 2.3 a | 84.0 b | 55.8 a | 2.0 a | 78.1 a | ||||
N4 | 45.1 a | 2.6 a | 82.1 a | 54.3 a | 2.3 a | 87.4 a | 57.0 a | 2.1 a | 83.8 a | ||||
平均值Average | 40.7 | 2.5 | 71.4 | 52.5 | 2.3 | 83.6 | 56.0 | 2.0 | 79.3 | ||||
F值 F-value | 品种 C | 159.5** | 1.84 | 32.92** | 244.4** | 0.66 | 220.8** | 301.4** | 0.52 | 209.8** | |||
穗肥 N | 90.52** | 1.55 | 81.53** | 2.92 | 2.15 | 14.52** | 0.75 | 0.23 | 9.93* | ||||
C×N | 15.25** | 0.02 | 6.52* | 0.95 | 1.51 | 1.61 | 0.81 | 0.67 | 0.71 |
表 2 氮素穗肥运筹对上3叶叶长、叶宽及面积的影响
Table 2 Effects of nitrogen topdressing for panide initiation on leaf length, width and area of the uppermost three leaves in rice.
品种 Cultivar | 穗肥处理 Nitrogen application for panicle initiation | 剑叶 Flag leaf | 倒2叶 2nd leaf from top | 倒3叶 3rd leaf from top | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
长 Length/cm | 宽 Width/cm | 面积 Area/cm2 | 长 Length/cm | 宽 Width/cm | 面积 Area/cm2 | 长 Length/cm | 宽 Width/cm | 面积 Area/cm2 | |||||
C1 | N1 | 35.0 b | 2.5 a | 61.3 d | 44.4 a | 2.3 a | 71.5 b | 48.6 a | 2.0 a | 67.9 b | |||
N2 | 35.3 b | 2.6 a | 64.2 c | 44.6 a | 2.3 a | 71.8 b | 48.4 a | 2.0 a | 67.8 b | ||||
N3 | 38.9 a | 2.6 a | 70.8 b | 45.4 a | 2.3 a | 73.1 ab | 48.4 a | 2.0 a | 67.8 b | ||||
N4 | 39.4 a | 2.7 a | 74.5 a | 45.4 a | 2.4 a | 76.3 a | 48.4 a | 2.1 a | 71.1 a | ||||
平均值Average | 37.1 | 2.6 | 67.7 | 44.5 | 2.3 | 73.2 | 48.4 | 2.0 | 68.7 | ||||
C2 | N1 | 36.8 c | 2.4 a | 61.8 c | 51.5 b | 2.2 a | 79.3 c | 55.1 a | 2.0 a | 77.1 a | |||
N2 | 40.5 b | 2.5 a | 70.9 b | 51.9 b | 2.3 a | 83.6 b | 55.9 a | 2.0 a | 78.3 a | ||||
N3 | 40.5 b | 2.5 a | 70.9 b | 52.2 ab | 2.3 a | 84.0 b | 55.8 a | 2.0 a | 78.1 a | ||||
N4 | 45.1 a | 2.6 a | 82.1 a | 54.3 a | 2.3 a | 87.4 a | 57.0 a | 2.1 a | 83.8 a | ||||
平均值Average | 40.7 | 2.5 | 71.4 | 52.5 | 2.3 | 83.6 | 56.0 | 2.0 | 79.3 | ||||
F值 F-value | 品种 C | 159.5** | 1.84 | 32.92** | 244.4** | 0.66 | 220.8** | 301.4** | 0.52 | 209.8** | |||
穗肥 N | 90.52** | 1.55 | 81.53** | 2.92 | 2.15 | 14.52** | 0.75 | 0.23 | 9.93* | ||||
C×N | 15.25** | 0.02 | 6.52* | 0.95 | 1.51 | 1.61 | 0.81 | 0.67 | 0.71 |
品种 Cultivar | 穗肥处理 Nitrogen application For panicle initiation | 基角Basic angle/° | 开张角Stretch angle/° | 披垂角 Droop angle/° | 透光率 LTR/% | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
剑叶 Flag leaf | 倒2叶 2nd leaf from top | 倒3叶 3rd leaf from top | 剑叶 Flag leaf | 倒2叶 2nd leaf from top | 倒3叶 3rd leaf from top | 剑叶 Flag leaf | 倒2叶 2nd leaf from top | 倒3叶 3rd leaf from top | |||||
C1 | N1 | 14.5 | 20.8 | 26.0 | 19.1 | 26.1 | 29.6 | 4.6 | 5.3 | 3.6 | 3.24 | ||
N2 | 16.4 | 22.5 | 28.0 | 30.2 | 30.4 | 31.1 | 13.8 | 7.9 | 3.1 | 2.78 | |||
N3 | 15.1 | 21.7 | 27.7 | 47.6 | 34.4 | 30.7 | 32.5 | 12.7 | 3.0 | 2.19 | |||
N4 | 16.2 | 19.7 | 26.2 | 50.5 | 34.6 | 29.3 | 34.3 | 14.9 | 3.1 | 1.58 | |||
平均值Average | 15.6 | 21.2 | 27.0 | 36.9 | 31.4 | 30.2 | 21.3 | 10.2 | 3.2 | 2.45 | |||
C2 | N1 | 10.8 | 17.5 | 23.3 | 12.5 | 25.6 | 30.7 | 1.7 | 8.1 | 7.4 | 3.55 | ||
N2 | 16.1 | 18.8 | 25.4 | 25.8 | 26.9 | 33.5 | 9.7 | 8.1 | 8.1 | 2.59 | |||
N3 | 20.5 | 25.1 | 27.2 | 60.5 | 42.7 | 39.2 | 40.0 | 17.6 | 12.0 | 1.50 | |||
N4 | 21.6 | 24.1 | 29.3 | 63.3 | 43.2 | 43.5 | 41.7 | 19.1 | 14.2 | 1.12 | |||
平均值Average | 17.3 | 21.4 | 26.3 | 40.5 | 34.6 | 36.7 | 23.3 | 13.2 | 10.4 | 2.19 |
表 3 氮素穗肥运筹对叶片叶角和群体透光的影响
Table 3 Effects of nitrogen application for panicle initiation on leaf angle and light transmittance ratio.
品种 Cultivar | 穗肥处理 Nitrogen application For panicle initiation | 基角Basic angle/° | 开张角Stretch angle/° | 披垂角 Droop angle/° | 透光率 LTR/% | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
剑叶 Flag leaf | 倒2叶 2nd leaf from top | 倒3叶 3rd leaf from top | 剑叶 Flag leaf | 倒2叶 2nd leaf from top | 倒3叶 3rd leaf from top | 剑叶 Flag leaf | 倒2叶 2nd leaf from top | 倒3叶 3rd leaf from top | |||||
C1 | N1 | 14.5 | 20.8 | 26.0 | 19.1 | 26.1 | 29.6 | 4.6 | 5.3 | 3.6 | 3.24 | ||
N2 | 16.4 | 22.5 | 28.0 | 30.2 | 30.4 | 31.1 | 13.8 | 7.9 | 3.1 | 2.78 | |||
N3 | 15.1 | 21.7 | 27.7 | 47.6 | 34.4 | 30.7 | 32.5 | 12.7 | 3.0 | 2.19 | |||
N4 | 16.2 | 19.7 | 26.2 | 50.5 | 34.6 | 29.3 | 34.3 | 14.9 | 3.1 | 1.58 | |||
平均值Average | 15.6 | 21.2 | 27.0 | 36.9 | 31.4 | 30.2 | 21.3 | 10.2 | 3.2 | 2.45 | |||
C2 | N1 | 10.8 | 17.5 | 23.3 | 12.5 | 25.6 | 30.7 | 1.7 | 8.1 | 7.4 | 3.55 | ||
N2 | 16.1 | 18.8 | 25.4 | 25.8 | 26.9 | 33.5 | 9.7 | 8.1 | 8.1 | 2.59 | |||
N3 | 20.5 | 25.1 | 27.2 | 60.5 | 42.7 | 39.2 | 40.0 | 17.6 | 12.0 | 1.50 | |||
N4 | 21.6 | 24.1 | 29.3 | 63.3 | 43.2 | 43.5 | 41.7 | 19.1 | 14.2 | 1.12 | |||
平均值Average | 17.3 | 21.4 | 26.3 | 40.5 | 34.6 | 36.7 | 23.3 | 13.2 | 10.4 | 2.19 |
图 1 氮素穗肥运筹对齐穗后7 d上3叶净光合速率(Pn)的影响
Fig. 1. Effects of nitrogen application for panicle initiation on photosynthetic rate of uppermost three leaves at the seventh day after heading.
品种 Cultivar | 穗肥处理 Nitrogen application for panicle initiation | 齐穗期 Heading stage | 成熟期叶面积指数 LAI 2 | 叶面积衰减率 LDR/% | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
上三叶面积指数 LAI 1 | 总叶面积指数 LAI t | LAI 1/LAI t (%) | ||||
C1 | N1 | 5.10 c | 8.00 c | 63.7 b | 5.31 a | 33.6 c |
N2 | 5.16 c | 8.03 c | 64.3 b | 5.15 a | 35.9 c | |
N3 | 5.47 b | 8.52 b | 64.3 b | 4.21 b | 50.6 b | |
N4 | 6.51 a | 9.97 a | 65.3 a | 4.01 b | 59.8 a | |
平均值Average | 5.48 | 8.63 | 64.4 | 4.67 | 45.0 | |
C2 | N1 | 5.09 c | 8.00 c | 63.7 b | 5.11 a | 36.1 c |
N2 | 5.75 b | 8.79 b | 65.4 a | 5.34 a | 39.2 c | |
N3 | 5.82 b | 8.90 b | 65.4 a | 4.64 b | 47.8 b | |
N4 | 6.71 a | 10.16 a | 66.0 a | 3.85 c | 62.1 a | |
平均值Average | 5.79 | 8.96 | 65.1 | 4.74 | 46.3 | |
F值F-value | C | 55.93* | 10.60* | 3.84 | 0.66 | 1.49 |
N | 127.6** | 77.35** | 12.12** | 18.45** | 51.21** | |
C×N | 6.72** | 2.60 | 1.28 | 1.02 | 0.70 |
表4 氮素穗肥运筹对叶面积的影响
Table 4 Effects of nitrogen application for panicle initiation on of leaf area.
品种 Cultivar | 穗肥处理 Nitrogen application for panicle initiation | 齐穗期 Heading stage | 成熟期叶面积指数 LAI 2 | 叶面积衰减率 LDR/% | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
上三叶面积指数 LAI 1 | 总叶面积指数 LAI t | LAI 1/LAI t (%) | ||||
C1 | N1 | 5.10 c | 8.00 c | 63.7 b | 5.31 a | 33.6 c |
N2 | 5.16 c | 8.03 c | 64.3 b | 5.15 a | 35.9 c | |
N3 | 5.47 b | 8.52 b | 64.3 b | 4.21 b | 50.6 b | |
N4 | 6.51 a | 9.97 a | 65.3 a | 4.01 b | 59.8 a | |
平均值Average | 5.48 | 8.63 | 64.4 | 4.67 | 45.0 | |
C2 | N1 | 5.09 c | 8.00 c | 63.7 b | 5.11 a | 36.1 c |
N2 | 5.75 b | 8.79 b | 65.4 a | 5.34 a | 39.2 c | |
N3 | 5.82 b | 8.90 b | 65.4 a | 4.64 b | 47.8 b | |
N4 | 6.71 a | 10.16 a | 66.0 a | 3.85 c | 62.1 a | |
平均值Average | 5.79 | 8.96 | 65.1 | 4.74 | 46.3 | |
F值F-value | C | 55.93* | 10.60* | 3.84 | 0.66 | 1.49 |
N | 127.6** | 77.35** | 12.12** | 18.45** | 51.21** | |
C×N | 6.72** | 2.60 | 1.28 | 1.02 | 0.70 |
品种 Cultivar | 穗肥运筹 Nitrogen application for panicle initiation | 干物质积累 DA/(kg·hm-2) | 茎叶干物 质输出量 ESL/kg·hm-2 | 茎叶干物 质输出率 EPSL/% | 茎叶干物 质贡献率 CPSL/% | 收获指数 HI | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
抽穗期 Heading | 成熟期 Mature | 抽穗-成熟 Heading to mature | ||||||
C1 | N1 | 11 112.0 b | 18 234.5 a | 7 122.5 a | 1 499.4 c | 16.37 c | 14.19 c | 0.527 a |
N2 | 11 559.0 ab | 18 130.8 a | 6 571.0 ab | 1 807.8 b | 18.80 b | 17.55 b | 0.514 b | |
N3 | 11 806.2 a | 18 119.4 a | 6 313.2 b | 2 090.4 a | 20.91 a | 20.47 a | 0.505 c | |
N4 | 12 045.3 a | 18 085.6 a | 5 863.6 b | 2 252.4 a | 21.97 a | 22.29 a | 0.501 c | |
平均值Average | 11 630.6 | 18 138.8 | 6 467.6 | 1 912.5 | 19.51 | 18.63 | 0.512 | |
C2 | N1 | 10 638.0 b | 17 363.9 a | 6 726.0 a | 976.8 b | 10.89 b | 10.47 b | 0.487 a |
N2 | 11 036.6 ab | 17 177.2 a | 6 140.7 ab | 1 287.0 a | 14.70 a | 15.03 a | 0.479 a | |
N3 | 11 474.4 a | 17 457.7 a | 5 983.3 b | 1 380.0 a | 13.21 a | 14.28 a | 0.465 b | |
N4 | 11 570.1 a | 17 398.5 a | 5 828.4 b | 1 449.1 a | 14.53 a | 16.34 a | 0.462 b | |
平均值Average | 11 179.7 | 17 349.4 | 6 169.6 | 1 273.2 | 13.33 | 14.03 | 0.473 | |
F值F-value | C | 25.8* | 19.94* | 14.44 | 141.8** | 125.0** | 75.95* | 267.0** |
N | 5.30* | 0.04 | 5.45* | 22.24** | 11.85** | 26.73** | 28.57** | |
C×N | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 3.10 | 2.22 | 2.44 | 0.45 |
表5 氮素穗肥运筹对干物质积累与同化物转运的影响
Table 5 Effects of nitrogen application for panicle initiation on dry matter accumulation(DA) and transformation of assimilative products.
品种 Cultivar | 穗肥运筹 Nitrogen application for panicle initiation | 干物质积累 DA/(kg·hm-2) | 茎叶干物 质输出量 ESL/kg·hm-2 | 茎叶干物 质输出率 EPSL/% | 茎叶干物 质贡献率 CPSL/% | 收获指数 HI | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
抽穗期 Heading | 成熟期 Mature | 抽穗-成熟 Heading to mature | ||||||
C1 | N1 | 11 112.0 b | 18 234.5 a | 7 122.5 a | 1 499.4 c | 16.37 c | 14.19 c | 0.527 a |
N2 | 11 559.0 ab | 18 130.8 a | 6 571.0 ab | 1 807.8 b | 18.80 b | 17.55 b | 0.514 b | |
N3 | 11 806.2 a | 18 119.4 a | 6 313.2 b | 2 090.4 a | 20.91 a | 20.47 a | 0.505 c | |
N4 | 12 045.3 a | 18 085.6 a | 5 863.6 b | 2 252.4 a | 21.97 a | 22.29 a | 0.501 c | |
平均值Average | 11 630.6 | 18 138.8 | 6 467.6 | 1 912.5 | 19.51 | 18.63 | 0.512 | |
C2 | N1 | 10 638.0 b | 17 363.9 a | 6 726.0 a | 976.8 b | 10.89 b | 10.47 b | 0.487 a |
N2 | 11 036.6 ab | 17 177.2 a | 6 140.7 ab | 1 287.0 a | 14.70 a | 15.03 a | 0.479 a | |
N3 | 11 474.4 a | 17 457.7 a | 5 983.3 b | 1 380.0 a | 13.21 a | 14.28 a | 0.465 b | |
N4 | 11 570.1 a | 17 398.5 a | 5 828.4 b | 1 449.1 a | 14.53 a | 16.34 a | 0.462 b | |
平均值Average | 11 179.7 | 17 349.4 | 6 169.6 | 1 273.2 | 13.33 | 14.03 | 0.473 | |
F值F-value | C | 25.8* | 19.94* | 14.44 | 141.8** | 125.0** | 75.95* | 267.0** |
N | 5.30* | 0.04 | 5.45* | 22.24** | 11.85** | 26.73** | 28.57** | |
C×N | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 3.10 | 2.22 | 2.44 | 0.45 |
品种 Cultivar | 穗肥运筹 Nitrogen application for panicle initiation | 有效穗数 Effective panicle number/(×104·hm-2) | 每穗粒数 No. of spiklets per panicle | 总颖花量 Total spikelets /(×104·hm-2) | 结实率 Seed-setting rate /% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | 实际产量 Grain yield /(kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | N1 | 228.0 b | 162.4 a | 37 027 a | 87.6 a | 31.31 a | 9 652.9 a |
N2 | 228.6 b | 159.3 a | 36 529 a | 86.4 a | 30.88 b | 9 295.3 b | |
N3 | 240.6 a | 151.8 b | 36 371 a | 84.9 b | 30.56 bc | 9 109.9 b | |
N4 | 231.0 b | 158.8 a | 36 609 a | 84.8 b | 30.01 c | 9 068.0 b | |
平均值Average | 232.1 | 158.2 | 36 634 | 85.9 | 30.69 | 9 281.5 | |
C2 | N1 | 220.8 a | 143.5 a | 31 583 ab | 80.9 a | 34.39 a | 8 450.8 a |
N2 | 220.2 a | 143.2 a | 31 525 b | 80.8 a | 34.14 a | 8 221.5 ab | |
N3 | 224.4 a | 136.3 b | 30 283 c | 80.1 ab | 34.13 a | 8 128.7 b | |
N4 | 223.8 a | 144.4 a | 32 360 a | 79.2 b | 33.15 b | 8 032.6 b | |
平均值Average | 222.3 | 141.8 | 31 437 | 80.3 | 33.95 | 8 208.4 | |
F值F- value | C | 31.70* | 48.48* | 533.2** | 33.00* | 21596.1** | 95.97* |
N | 3.43 | 5.86* | 4.79* | 8.76** | 41.30** | 7.52** | |
C×N | 2.07 | 0.12 | 3.17 | 1.27 | 1.74 | 0.43 |
表6 氮素穗肥运筹对产量及其构成因子的影响
Table 6 Effects of nitrogen application for panicle initiation on grain yield and its component.
品种 Cultivar | 穗肥运筹 Nitrogen application for panicle initiation | 有效穗数 Effective panicle number/(×104·hm-2) | 每穗粒数 No. of spiklets per panicle | 总颖花量 Total spikelets /(×104·hm-2) | 结实率 Seed-setting rate /% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | 实际产量 Grain yield /(kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | N1 | 228.0 b | 162.4 a | 37 027 a | 87.6 a | 31.31 a | 9 652.9 a |
N2 | 228.6 b | 159.3 a | 36 529 a | 86.4 a | 30.88 b | 9 295.3 b | |
N3 | 240.6 a | 151.8 b | 36 371 a | 84.9 b | 30.56 bc | 9 109.9 b | |
N4 | 231.0 b | 158.8 a | 36 609 a | 84.8 b | 30.01 c | 9 068.0 b | |
平均值Average | 232.1 | 158.2 | 36 634 | 85.9 | 30.69 | 9 281.5 | |
C2 | N1 | 220.8 a | 143.5 a | 31 583 ab | 80.9 a | 34.39 a | 8 450.8 a |
N2 | 220.2 a | 143.2 a | 31 525 b | 80.8 a | 34.14 a | 8 221.5 ab | |
N3 | 224.4 a | 136.3 b | 30 283 c | 80.1 ab | 34.13 a | 8 128.7 b | |
N4 | 223.8 a | 144.4 a | 32 360 a | 79.2 b | 33.15 b | 8 032.6 b | |
平均值Average | 222.3 | 141.8 | 31 437 | 80.3 | 33.95 | 8 208.4 | |
F值F- value | C | 31.70* | 48.48* | 533.2** | 33.00* | 21596.1** | 95.97* |
N | 3.43 | 5.86* | 4.79* | 8.76** | 41.30** | 7.52** | |
C×N | 2.07 | 0.12 | 3.17 | 1.27 | 1.74 | 0.43 |
[1] | Cassman K G, Peng S, Olk D C, Ladha J K, Reichardt W, Dobermann A, Singh U.Opportunities for increased nitrogen-use efficiency from improved resource management in irrigated rice systems.Field Crops Res, 1998, 56(1):7-39. |
[2] | 黄见良, 邹应斌, 彭少兵, Buresh R J.水稻对氮素的吸收、分配及其在组织中的挥发损失. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2004, 10(6):579-583. |
Huang J L, Zou Y B, Peng S B, Buresh R J.Nitrogen uptake, distribution by rice and its losses from plant tissues during.Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2004, 10(6):579-583.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 丁艳锋, 赵长华, 王强盛. 穗肥施用时期对水稻氮素利用及产量的影响. 南京农业大学学报, 2003, 26(4):5-8. |
Ding Y F, Zhao B H, Wang Q S.Effect of application stage of panicle fertilizer on rice grain yield and the utilization of nitrogen.J Nanjing Agric Univ, 2003, 26(4):5-8.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | Kamiji Y, Yoshida H, Palta J A, Sakuratani T, Shiraiwa T.N applications that increase plant N during panicle development are highly effective in increasing spikelet number in rice.Field Crops Res, 2011, 122(122):242-247. |
[5] | Jiang Q, Du Y, Tian X, Wang Q, Xiong R, Xu G, Yan C.Effect of panicle nitrogen on grain filling characteristics of high-yielding rice cultivars.Eur J Agron, 2015, 74:185-192. |
[6] | 李木英, 石庆华, 黄才立, 曾蕾, 潘晓华, 谭雪明. 穗肥运筹对超级杂交稻淦鑫688源库特征和氮肥效益的影响. 杂交水稻, 2010, 25(2):63-72. |
Li M Y, Shi Q H, Huang C L, Zeng L, Pan X H, Tan X M.Effects of nitrogen application of panicle fertilizer on source-sink characteristics and nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency of super hybrid rice ganxin 688.Hybird Rice, 2010, 25(2):63-72.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 张镇铭, 姚金富, 邵达孚, 高莲英. 不同群体条件下穗肥施用量对水稻分蘖成穗的影响. 西南农业学报, 1998(S3):149-152. |
Zhang Z M, Yao J F, Shao D F, Gao L Y.Effect of application rates of ear manure on percentages of productive tiller at different rice population densities.Southwest China J Agric Sci, 1998(S3):149-152.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 凌启鸿, 张洪程, 蔡建中, 苏祖芳. 水稻不同叶龄期施用穗肥的研究. 扬州大学学报:农业与生命科学版, 1985, 6(3):11-19. |
Ling Q H, Zhang H C, Cai J Z, Su Z F.Study on using ear-fertilizer at different leaf-age-period in rice.J Yangzhou Univ: Agric. & Life Sci, 1985, 6(3):11-19.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 林忠成, 李土明, 吴福观, 张洪程, 戴其根, 叶世超, 郭宏文. 基蘖肥与穗肥氮比例对双季稻产量和碳氮比的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011, 17(2):269-275. |
Lin Z C, Li T M, Wu F G, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Ye S C, Guo H W.Effects of nitrogen application on yield and C/N of double-cropping rice.Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2011, 17(2):269-275.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 付立东, 王宇, 隋鑫, 任海, 李旭, 李宝军. 氮素基蘖穗肥不同施入比例对超级稻生育及产量的影响. 作物杂志, 2010, (5):34-38. |
Fu L D, Wang Y, Sui X, Ren H, Li X, Li B J.Effects of the different rate of nitrogen base-tiller and panicle fertilizer on development and yield of super rice. Crop Sci, 2010(5):34-38. | |
[11] | 凌启鸿, 张洪程, 戴其根, 丁艳锋, 凌励, 苏祖芳, 徐茂, 阙金华, 王绍华. 水稻精确定量施氮研究. 中国农业科学, 2005, 38(12):2457-2467. |
Ling Q H, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Ding Y F, Ling L, Su Z F, Xu M, Que J H, Wang S H.Study on precise and quantitative N application in rice.Sci Agric Sin, 2005, 38(12):2457-2467.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 张洪程, 吴桂成, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 高辉, 魏海燕, 吕修涛, 万靓军, 黄银忠.水稻氮肥精确后移及其机制. 作物学报, 2011, 37(10):1837-1851. |
Zhang H C, Wu G C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Gao H, Wei H Y, Lv X T, Wan L J, Huang Y Z.Precise postponing nitrogen application and its mechanism in rice.Acta Agron Sin, 2011, 37(10):1837-1851.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 朴钟泽, 韩龙植, 高熙宗. 水稻不同基因型氮素利用效率差异. 中国水稻科学, 2003, 17(3):233-238. |
Piao Z Z, Han L Z, Koh H J.Variations of nitrogen use efficiency by rice genotype.Chin J Rice Sci, 2003, 17(3):233-238.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 殷春渊, 张庆, 魏海燕, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 马群, 杭杰, 张胜飞. 不同产量类型水稻基因型氮素吸收、利用效率的差异. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(1):39-50. |
Yin C Y, Zhang Q, Wei H Y, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Ma Q, Hang J, Zhang S F.Differences in nitrogen absorption and use efficiency in rice genotypes with different yield performance.Sci Agric Sin, 2010, 43(1):39-50.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 董桂春, 王熠, 于小凤, 周娟, 彭斌, 李进前, 田昊, 张燕, 袁秋梅, 王余龙. 不同生育期水稻品种氮素吸收利用的差异. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(22):4570-4582. |
Dong G C, Wang Y, Yu X F, Zhou J, Peng B, Li J Q, Tian H, Zhang Y, Yuan Q M, Wang Y L.Differences of nitrogen uptake and utilization of conventional rice varieties with different growth duration.Sci Agric Sin, 2011, 44(22):4570-4582. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 秦俭, 杨志远, 孙永健, 徐徽, 马均. 不同穗型杂交籼稻物质积累、氮素吸收利用和产量的差异比较. 中国水稻科学, 2014, 28(5):514-522. |
Qin J, Yang Z Y, Sun Y J, Xu H, Ma J.Differential comparison of assimilation products accumulation, nitrogen uptake and utilization and grain yield of hybrid indica rice cultivars with different panicle type. Chin J Rice Sci, 2014, 28(5):514-522.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 孙永健, 孙园园, 刘树金, 杨志远, 程洪彪, 贾现文, 马均. 水分管理和氮肥运筹对水稻养分吸收、转运及分配的影响. 作物学报, 2011, 37(12):2221-2232. |
Sun Y J, Sun Y Y, Liu S J, Yang Z Y, Cheng H B, Jia X W, Ma J.Effects of water management and nitrogen application strategies on nutrient absorption, transfer, and distribution in rice.Acta Agron Sin, 2011, 37(12):2221-2232.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 孙永健, 孙园园, 徐徽, 李玥, 严奉君, 蒋明金, 马均. 水氮管理模式对不同氮效率水稻氮素利用特性及产量的影响. 作物学报, 2014, 40(9):1639-1649. |
Sun Y J, Sun Y Y, Xu H, Li Y, Yan F J, Jiang M J, Ma J.Effects of water-nitrogen management patterns on nitrogen utilization characteristics and yield in rice cultivars with different nitrogen use efficiencies.Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40(9):1639-1649. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 陈惠哲, 朱德峰, 林贤青, 张玉屏. 穗肥施氮量对水稻剑叶生长及披垂的影响. 西南农业学报, 2007, 20(6):1246-1249. |
Chen H Z, Zhu D F, Lin X Q, Zhang Y P.Effect of amount of spike nitrogen application on growth and droop of flag leave in rice.Southwest China J Agric Sci, 2007, 20(6):1246-1249.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 凌启鸿.水稻精确定量栽培理论与技术. 北京:中国农业出版社, 2007. |
Ling Q H.Theory and technology of rice precise and quantitative cultivation. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2007.(in Chinese) | |
[21] | 许乃霞, 杨益花, 苏祖芳. 抽穗后水稻株型与高光效群体形成关系的研究.耕作与栽培, 2009(5):17-19. |
Xu N X, Yang Y H, Su Z F.Study on the relationship between rice plant type after heading stage and high photosynthetic efficiency population formation.Cult Plant, 2009(5):17-19.(in Chinese) | |
[22] | 陈惠哲, 朱德峰, 林贤青, 张玉屏, 张卫星. 促花肥施氮对超级杂交稻冠层叶片生长及光合速率的影响. 湖南农业大学学报:自然科学版, 2007, 33(5):617-621. |
Chen H Z, Zhu D F, Lin X Q, Zhang Y P, Zhang W X.Effect of nitrogen application for spikelet promotion on growth and photosynthetic rate of canopy leaves in super hybrid rice.J Hunan Agric Univ: Nat Sci, 2007, 33(5):617-621.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 闫川, 丁艳峰, 王强盛, 李刚华, 刘正辉, 缪小建, 郑永美, 魏广彬, 王绍华. 穗肥施量对水稻植株形态、群体生态及穗叶温度的影响. 作物学报, 2008, 34(12): 2176-2183. |
Yan C, Ding Y F, Wang Q S, Li G H, Liu Z H, Miu X J, Zheng Y M, Wei G B, Wang S H.Effect of panicle fertilizer application rate on morphological, ecological characteristics, and organ temperature of rice.Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34(12): 2176-2183.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 吕腾飞, 周伟, 孙永健, 朱懿, 严奉君, 杨志远, 马均. 不同秧龄和氮肥运筹对杂交籼稻株型的影响. 浙江大学学报:农业与生命科学版, 2015, 41(2):169-178. |
Lv T F, Zhou W, Sun Y J, Zhu Y, Yan F J, Yang Z Y, Ma J.Effects of different transplanting seedling ages and nitrogen managements on plant type of indica hybrid rice. J Zhejiang Univ :Agric & Life Sci, 2015, 41(2): 169-178.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 李艳大, 汤亮, 张玉屏, 朱相成, 曹卫星, 朱艳. 水稻冠层光截获与叶面积和产量的关系. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(16):3296-3305. |
Li Y D, Tang L, Zhang Y P, Zhu X C, Cao W X, Zhu Y.Relationship of PAR interception of canopy to leaf area and yield in rice.Sci Agric Sin, 2010, 43(16): 3296-3305.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | 吕川根, 邹江石. 两个超级杂交稻与汕优63光合株型的比较分析. 中国农业科学, 2003, 36(6):633-639. |
Lv C G, Zou J S.Comparative analysis on plant type of two super hybrid rice and shanyou 63.Sci Agric Sin, 2003, 36(6):633-639.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | 任亮, 郑家奎, 蒋强. 长江上游地区高产杂交水稻品种部分株型因子及生理特征研究. 西南农业学报, 2008, 21(6):1551-1554. |
Ren L, Zhen J K, Jiang Q.Studies on some plant type components and physiological characteristics of high-yielding hybrid rice in upstream of Yangtze river.Southwest China J Agric Sci, 2008, 21(6):1551-1554.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | 孟天瑶,李晓芸,李超, 韦还和, 史天宇, 马荣荣, 王晓燕, 杨筠文, 戴其根, 张洪程.甬优系列籼粳杂交稻中熟高产品系的株型特征. 中国水稻科学, 2016, 30(2):170-180. |
Meng T Y, Li X Y, Li C, Wei H H, Shi T Y, Ma R R, Wang X Y, Yang J W, Dai Q G, Zhang H C.Plant-type characteristics of high-yielding Lines of yongyou japonica/indica hybrid rice with medium maturity. Chin J Rice Sci, 2016, 30(2):170-180.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 郭展, 张运波. 水稻对干旱胁迫的生理生化响应及分子调控研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 335-349. |
[2] | 韦还和, 马唯一, 左博源, 汪璐璐, 朱旺, 耿孝宇, 张翔, 孟天瑶, 陈英龙, 高平磊, 许轲, 霍中洋, 戴其根. 盐、干旱及其复合胁迫对水稻产量和品质形成影响的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 350-363. |
[3] | 许丹洁, 林巧霞, 李正康, 庄小倩, 凌宇, 赖美玲, 陈晓婷, 鲁国东. OsOPR10正调控水稻对稻瘟病和白叶枯病的抗性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 364-374. |
[4] | 候小琴, 王莹, 余贝, 符卫蒙, 奉保华, 沈煜潮, 谢杭军, 王焕然, 许用强, 武志海, 王建军, 陶龙兴, 符冠富. 黄腐酸钾提高水稻秧苗耐盐性的作用途径分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 409-421. |
[5] | 吕宙, 易秉怀, 陈平平, 周文新, 唐文帮, 易镇邪. 施氮量与移栽密度对小粒型杂交水稻产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 422-436. |
[6] | 胡继杰, 胡志华, 张均华, 曹小闯, 金千瑜, 章志远, 朱练峰. 根际饱和溶解氧对水稻分蘖期光合及生长特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 437-446. |
[7] | 刘福祥, 甄浩洋, 彭焕, 郑刘春, 彭德良, 文艳华. 广东省水稻孢囊线虫病调查与鉴定[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 456-461. |
[8] | 陈浩田, 秦缘, 钟笑涵, 林晨语, 秦竞航, 杨建昌, 张伟杨. 水稻根系和土壤性状与稻田甲烷排放关系的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 233-245. |
[9] | 缪军, 冉金晖, 徐梦彬, 卜柳冰, 王平, 梁国华, 周勇. 过量表达异三聚体G蛋白γ亚基基因RGG2提高水稻抗旱性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 246-255. |
[10] | 尹潇潇, 张芷菡, 颜绣莲, 廖蓉, 杨思葭, 郭岱铭, 樊晶, 赵志学, 王文明. 多个稻曲病菌效应因子的信号肽验证和表达分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 256-265. |
[11] | 朱裕敬, 桂金鑫, 龚成云, 罗新阳, 石居斌, 张海清, 贺记外. 全基因组关联分析定位水稻分蘖角度QTL[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 266-276. |
[12] | 赵艺婷, 谢可冉, 高逖, 崔克辉. 水稻分蘖期干旱锻炼对幼穗分化期高温下穗发育和产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 277-289. |
[13] | 魏倩倩, 汪玉磊, 孔海民, 徐青山, 颜玉莲, 潘林, 迟春欣, 孔亚丽, 田文昊, 朱练峰, 曹小闯, 张均华, 朱春权. 信号分子硫化氢参与硫肥缓解铝对水稻生长抑制作用的机制[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 290-302. |
[14] | 周甜, 吴少华, 康建宏, 吴宏亮, 杨生龙, 王星强, 李昱, 黄玉峰. 不同种植模式对水稻籽粒淀粉含量及淀粉关键酶活性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 303-315. |
[15] | 关雅琪, 鄂志国, 王磊, 申红芳. 影响中国水稻生产环节外包发展因素的实证研究:基于群体效应视角[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 324-334. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||