中国水稻科学 ›› 2016, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 507-524.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2016.6012
田青兰1, 刘波1, 孙红1, 何莎2, 钟晓媛1, 赵敏1, 任万军1,*()
收稿日期:
2016-01-26
修回日期:
2016-05-14
出版日期:
2016-09-10
发布日期:
2016-09-10
通讯作者:
任万军
基金资助:
Qing-lan TIAN1, Bo LIU1, Hong SUN1, Sha HE2, Xiao-yuan ZHONG1, Min ZHAO1, Wan-jun REN1,*()
Received:
2016-01-26
Revised:
2016-05-14
Online:
2016-09-10
Published:
2016-09-10
Contact:
Wan-jun REN
摘要:
为探明不同播栽方式下杂交籼稻幼穗分化期茎秆和幼穗生长的规律及差异以进一步明确不同播栽方式穗粒形成特点,于2014年采用两因素裂区试验设计,研究了机直播、机插和手插3种播栽方式下2个不同穗粒型杂交籼稻组合[宜香优2115(中穗型)和F优498(大穗型)]的穗分化期茎秆和幼穗生长规律和穗粒形成特点,并分析了幼穗分化期气象因素与幼穗和茎秆生长的关系。结果表明:1)基部向上第1至第3伸长节间长度分别在抽穗前20 d、16 d、12 d后趋于稳定,故基部第1、2节间的降长增粗应在抽穗前16 d之前;穗干质量和穗茎比在抽穗前12 d后迅速增加。2)从抽穗前16 d开始至抽穗期,穗茎干重比与多数枝梗和颖花性状呈显著或极显著正相关,穗与茎秆竞争同化物的能力直接影响到穗粒形成。3)机插穗分化中后期穗茎干质量比较高,且抽穗期穗干质量显著高于手插和机直播,有利于提高其每穗粒数,且机插拔节后群体生长率及单茎和群体干物质积累量较高,抽穗期叶面积指数较高,粒叶比高于机直播,较机直播更利于粒重的提高和穗长及着粒数的增加;大穗型品种F优498抽穗期穗干质量显著高于中穗型品种宜香优2115,且穗分化后期穗茎干质量比高于宜香优2115,是其每穗粒数高的重要原因;F优498穗部着粒较密,较大的叶面积指数及粒叶比利于大穗的形成。4)机插全生育期最长,机直播最短,且机插穗分化期历时较长,穗分化期积温和日照时数较高,为穗粒形成提供了较好的温光条件;茎秆长度和干质量及穗长受气象因子影响较大,孕穗前适宜的温度和一定的积温有利于茎秆和幼穗伸长及茎秆的物质充实。生产上应针对不同播栽方式及品种的生育进程差异,适时采取措施调节茎秆和幼穗生长及物质分配,在培育壮秆的基础上提高穗分化期穗茎比以达到增粒增产的目的。
中图分类号:
田青兰, 刘波, 孙红, 何莎, 钟晓媛, 赵敏, 任万军. 不同播栽方式下杂交籼稻茎秆生长和穗粒形成特点及与气象因子的关系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2016, 30(5): 507-524.
Qing-lan TIAN, Bo LIU, Hong SUN, Sha HE, Xiao-yuan ZHONG, Min ZHAO, Wan-jun REN. Characteristics of Stem Growth and Formation of Grain of indica Hybrid Rice in Different Planting Methods and Their Correlation with Meteorological Factors[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2016, 30(5): 507-524.
图1 不同栽插方式下籼稻穗分化期茎秆长度变化 MD-机直播; MT-机插; HT-手插。下同。
Fig.1. Changes in the length of stem of indica hybrid rice at the panicle differentiation stage in various planting methods. MD, Mechanized direct-seeding; MT, Mechanized transplanting; HT, Hand transplanting. The same as below.
图2 不同栽插方式下籼稻穗分化期各伸长节间(N1~N6)的长度变化
Fig. 2. Change in the length of N1-N6 elongated internodes of indica hybrid rice at the panicle differentiation stage in various planting methods.
播栽方式 Planting method | 长度 Length/cm | 长轴直径 Long axis diameter/mm | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N1 | N2 | N3 | N1 | N2 | N3 | ||
机直播 MD | |||||||
宜香优2115 YXY 2115 | 2.54±0.44 a | 7.58±0.79 Aa | 10.47±0.42 a | 7.02±0.19 | 7.07±0.12 | 6.55±0.10 | |
F优498 FY 498 | 2.03±0.16 b | 6.02±0.4 Bb | 9.43±0.55 b | 6.73±0.01 | 6.95±0.07 | 6.47±0.01 | |
机插 MT | |||||||
宜香优2115 YXY 2115 | 3.18±0.31 a | 8.48±0.14 Aa | 9.89±0.65 | 7.34±0.20 | 7.36±0.11 | 6.78±0.08 | |
F优498 FY 498 | 2.50±0.33 b | 6.75±0.41 Bb | 10.15±0.35 | 7.35±0.22 | 7.36±0.29 | 6.75±0.22 | |
手插 HT | |||||||
宜香优2115 YXY 2115 | 2.96±0.47 a | 7.65±0.78 a | 10.74±0.24 | 7.39±0.34 b | 7.48±0.17 | 6.74±0.06 | |
F优498 FY 498 | 2.45±0.11 a | 6.35±0.37 b | 10.01±0.71 | 7.92±0.23 a | 7.47±0.14 | 6.86±0.10 | |
平均值 Mean | |||||||
机直播 MD | 2.29±0.36 Bb | 6.80±1.1 Bb | 9.95±0.73 | 6.87±0.2Bc | 7.01±0.09 Bb | 6.51±0.06 Bb | |
机插 MT | 2.84±0.48 Aa | 7.62±1.22 Aa | 10.02±0.19 | 7.34±0.004 Ab | 7.36±0.002 ABa | 6.76±0.02 Aa | |
手插 HT | 2.71±0.36 Aa | 7.00±0.91 Bb | 10.38±0.51 | 7.65±0.37 Aa | 7.47±0.004 Aa | 6.80±0.08 Aa | |
宜香优2115 YXY 2115 | 2.90±0.32 Aa | 7.90±0.50 Aa | 10.37±0.43 a | 7.25±0.20 | 7.30±0.21 | 6.69±0.12 | |
F优498 FY 498 | 2.54±0.44 a | 7.58±0.79 Aa | 10.47±0.42 a | 7.33±0.59 | 7.26±0.28 | 6.69±0.20 | |
F值F value | |||||||
播栽方式 PM | 21.05** | 20.41** | 1.54 | 35.24** | 16.93* | 31.90** | |
品种 V | 15.87** | 38.48** | 6.32* | 0.86 | 0.43 | 0.00 | |
播栽方式×品种 PM×V | 0.15 | 0.26 | 3.89(*) | 7.33* | 0.35 | 1.06 | |
播栽方式 Planting method | 短轴直径 Short axis diameter/mm | 扁平率 Oblate rate/% | |||||
N1 | N2 | N3 | N1 | N2 | N3 | ||
机直播 MD | |||||||
宜香优2115 YXY 2115 | 6.42±0.12 a | 6.29±0.04 | 5.74±0.04 | 8.53±1.05 | 11.03±0.93 | 12.32±0.84 a | |
F优498 FY 498 | 6.19±0.06 b | 6.24±0.11 | 5.78±0.10 | 8.06±0.88 | 10.10±1.87 | 10.61±1.35 b | |
机插 MT | |||||||
宜香优2115 YXY 2115 | 6.61±0.19 | 6.67±0.07 | 5.98±0.08 | 9.91±0.95 | 9.38±1.78 | 11.69±0.26 a | |
F优498 FY 498 | 6.45±0.16 | 6.63±0.25 | 6.11±0.25 | 12.16±0.87 | 9.88±0.62 | 9.53±0.69 b | |
手插 HT | |||||||
宜香优2115 YXY 2115 | 6.68±0.19 | 6.49±0.10 | 5.89±0.03 b | 9.47±1.85 b | 13.20±1.34 a | 12.54±0.75 Aa | |
F优498 FY 498 | 6.75±0.30 | 6.81±0.26 | 6.21±0.15 a | 14.64±2.76 a | 8.72±2.60 b | 9.36±0.92 Bb | |
平均值 Mean | |||||||
机直播 MD | 6.30±0.16 Bb | 6.27±0.04 b | 5.76±0.03 Bb | 8.29±0.34 b | 10.56±0.66 | 11.45±1.21 | |
机插 MT | 6.53±0.11 ABa | 6.65±0.03 a | 6.05±0.09 Aa | 11.01±1.59 a | 9.63±0.36 | 10.58±1.53 | |
手插 HT | 6.72±0.05 Aa | 6.65±0.23 a | 6.05±0.23 Aa | 11.94±3.65 a | 10.86±3.17 | 10.90±2.25 | |
宜香优2115 YXY 2115 | 6.57±0.14 | 6.48±0.19 | 5.87±0.12 | 9.30±0.70 b | 11.16±1.92 | 12.18±0.44 Aa | |
F优498 FY 498 | 6.46±0.28 | 6.56±0.29 | 6.03±0.23 | 11.47±3.32 a | 9.56±0.74 | 9.83±0.68 Bb | |
F值F value | |||||||
播栽方式 PM | 15.85* | 13.74* | 16.78* | 10.04* | 0.63 | 1.52 | |
品种 V | 3.06 | 0.94 | 5.25(*) | 7.60* | 3.88(*) | 27.86** | |
播栽方式×品种 PM×V | 2.22 | 2.27 | 1.39 | 3.88(*) | 3.23 | 1.00 | |
播栽方式 Planting method | 外径 Stem diameter/mm | 秆型指数 Stem type index | |||||
N1 | N2 | N3 | N1 | N2 | N3 | ||
机直播 MD | |||||||
宜香优2115 YXY2115 | 6.72±0.15 a | 6.68±0.08 | 6.15±0.07 | 0.270±0.045 b | 0.089±0.009 Bb | 0.059±0.002 b | |
F优498 FY498 | 6.46±0.03 b | 6.59±0.07 | 6.13±0.05 | 0.320±0.026 a | 0.110±0.006 Aa | 0.065±0.004 a | |
机插 MT | |||||||
宜香优2115 YXY2115 | 6.98±0.19 | 7.01±0.06 | 6.38±0.08 | 0.220±0.015 b | 0.083±0.002 Bb | 0.065±0.004 | |
F优498 FY498 | 6.90±0.18 | 6.99±0.27 | 6.43±0.24 | 0.278±0.032 a | 0.104±0.003 Aa | 0.063±0.001 | |
手插 HT | |||||||
宜香优2115 YXY21156.68±0.19 | 7.04±0.26 b | 6.98±0.13 | 6.32±0.04 | 0.240±0.027 b | 0.092±0.007 Bb | 0.059±0.001 b | |
F优498 FY498 | 7.34±0.24 a | 7.14±0.19 | 6.53±0.12 | 0.300±0.024 a | 0.113±0.009 Aa | 0.066±0.006 a | |
平均值 Mean | |||||||
机直播 MD | 6.59±0.18 Bc | 6.64±0.06 Bb | 6.14±0.01 Bb | 0.295±0.035 a | 0.099±0.015 ab | 0.062±0.004 | |
机插 MT | 6.94±0.06 ABb | 7.00±0.01Aa | 6.40±0.04Aa | 0.249±0.041 b | 0.093±0.015 b | 0.064±0.001 | |
手插 HT | 7.19±0.21 Aa | 7.06±0.11 Aa | 6.43±0.15 Aa | 0.270±0.042 ab | 0.102±0.015 a | 0.062±0.005 | |
宜香优2115 YXY2115 | 6.91±0.17 | 6.89±0.18 | 6.28±0.12 | 0.243±0.025 Bb | 0.088±0.005 Bb | 0.061±0.003 b | |
F优498 FY498 | 6.90±0.44 | 6.91±0.28 | 6.36±0.21 | 0.299±0.021Aa | 0.109±0.005Aa | 0.065±0.001a | |
F值F value | |||||||
播栽方式 PM | 30.94** | 19.59** | 24.14** | 5.31(*) | 8.80* | 0.74 | |
品种 V | 0.03 | 0.06 | 1.75 | 21.98** | 47.37** | 6.32* | |
播栽方式×品种 PM×V | 6.04* | 1.13 | 1.27 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 2.84 |
表1 不同栽插方式下杂交籼稻基部伸长节间性状比较
Table 1 Comparison of the characters of basal elongated internodes of indica hybrid rice in various planting methods.
播栽方式 Planting method | 长度 Length/cm | 长轴直径 Long axis diameter/mm | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N1 | N2 | N3 | N1 | N2 | N3 | ||
机直播 MD | |||||||
宜香优2115 YXY 2115 | 2.54±0.44 a | 7.58±0.79 Aa | 10.47±0.42 a | 7.02±0.19 | 7.07±0.12 | 6.55±0.10 | |
F优498 FY 498 | 2.03±0.16 b | 6.02±0.4 Bb | 9.43±0.55 b | 6.73±0.01 | 6.95±0.07 | 6.47±0.01 | |
机插 MT | |||||||
宜香优2115 YXY 2115 | 3.18±0.31 a | 8.48±0.14 Aa | 9.89±0.65 | 7.34±0.20 | 7.36±0.11 | 6.78±0.08 | |
F优498 FY 498 | 2.50±0.33 b | 6.75±0.41 Bb | 10.15±0.35 | 7.35±0.22 | 7.36±0.29 | 6.75±0.22 | |
手插 HT | |||||||
宜香优2115 YXY 2115 | 2.96±0.47 a | 7.65±0.78 a | 10.74±0.24 | 7.39±0.34 b | 7.48±0.17 | 6.74±0.06 | |
F优498 FY 498 | 2.45±0.11 a | 6.35±0.37 b | 10.01±0.71 | 7.92±0.23 a | 7.47±0.14 | 6.86±0.10 | |
平均值 Mean | |||||||
机直播 MD | 2.29±0.36 Bb | 6.80±1.1 Bb | 9.95±0.73 | 6.87±0.2Bc | 7.01±0.09 Bb | 6.51±0.06 Bb | |
机插 MT | 2.84±0.48 Aa | 7.62±1.22 Aa | 10.02±0.19 | 7.34±0.004 Ab | 7.36±0.002 ABa | 6.76±0.02 Aa | |
手插 HT | 2.71±0.36 Aa | 7.00±0.91 Bb | 10.38±0.51 | 7.65±0.37 Aa | 7.47±0.004 Aa | 6.80±0.08 Aa | |
宜香优2115 YXY 2115 | 2.90±0.32 Aa | 7.90±0.50 Aa | 10.37±0.43 a | 7.25±0.20 | 7.30±0.21 | 6.69±0.12 | |
F优498 FY 498 | 2.54±0.44 a | 7.58±0.79 Aa | 10.47±0.42 a | 7.33±0.59 | 7.26±0.28 | 6.69±0.20 | |
F值F value | |||||||
播栽方式 PM | 21.05** | 20.41** | 1.54 | 35.24** | 16.93* | 31.90** | |
品种 V | 15.87** | 38.48** | 6.32* | 0.86 | 0.43 | 0.00 | |
播栽方式×品种 PM×V | 0.15 | 0.26 | 3.89(*) | 7.33* | 0.35 | 1.06 | |
播栽方式 Planting method | 短轴直径 Short axis diameter/mm | 扁平率 Oblate rate/% | |||||
N1 | N2 | N3 | N1 | N2 | N3 | ||
机直播 MD | |||||||
宜香优2115 YXY 2115 | 6.42±0.12 a | 6.29±0.04 | 5.74±0.04 | 8.53±1.05 | 11.03±0.93 | 12.32±0.84 a | |
F优498 FY 498 | 6.19±0.06 b | 6.24±0.11 | 5.78±0.10 | 8.06±0.88 | 10.10±1.87 | 10.61±1.35 b | |
机插 MT | |||||||
宜香优2115 YXY 2115 | 6.61±0.19 | 6.67±0.07 | 5.98±0.08 | 9.91±0.95 | 9.38±1.78 | 11.69±0.26 a | |
F优498 FY 498 | 6.45±0.16 | 6.63±0.25 | 6.11±0.25 | 12.16±0.87 | 9.88±0.62 | 9.53±0.69 b | |
手插 HT | |||||||
宜香优2115 YXY 2115 | 6.68±0.19 | 6.49±0.10 | 5.89±0.03 b | 9.47±1.85 b | 13.20±1.34 a | 12.54±0.75 Aa | |
F优498 FY 498 | 6.75±0.30 | 6.81±0.26 | 6.21±0.15 a | 14.64±2.76 a | 8.72±2.60 b | 9.36±0.92 Bb | |
平均值 Mean | |||||||
机直播 MD | 6.30±0.16 Bb | 6.27±0.04 b | 5.76±0.03 Bb | 8.29±0.34 b | 10.56±0.66 | 11.45±1.21 | |
机插 MT | 6.53±0.11 ABa | 6.65±0.03 a | 6.05±0.09 Aa | 11.01±1.59 a | 9.63±0.36 | 10.58±1.53 | |
手插 HT | 6.72±0.05 Aa | 6.65±0.23 a | 6.05±0.23 Aa | 11.94±3.65 a | 10.86±3.17 | 10.90±2.25 | |
宜香优2115 YXY 2115 | 6.57±0.14 | 6.48±0.19 | 5.87±0.12 | 9.30±0.70 b | 11.16±1.92 | 12.18±0.44 Aa | |
F优498 FY 498 | 6.46±0.28 | 6.56±0.29 | 6.03±0.23 | 11.47±3.32 a | 9.56±0.74 | 9.83±0.68 Bb | |
F值F value | |||||||
播栽方式 PM | 15.85* | 13.74* | 16.78* | 10.04* | 0.63 | 1.52 | |
品种 V | 3.06 | 0.94 | 5.25(*) | 7.60* | 3.88(*) | 27.86** | |
播栽方式×品种 PM×V | 2.22 | 2.27 | 1.39 | 3.88(*) | 3.23 | 1.00 | |
播栽方式 Planting method | 外径 Stem diameter/mm | 秆型指数 Stem type index | |||||
N1 | N2 | N3 | N1 | N2 | N3 | ||
机直播 MD | |||||||
宜香优2115 YXY2115 | 6.72±0.15 a | 6.68±0.08 | 6.15±0.07 | 0.270±0.045 b | 0.089±0.009 Bb | 0.059±0.002 b | |
F优498 FY498 | 6.46±0.03 b | 6.59±0.07 | 6.13±0.05 | 0.320±0.026 a | 0.110±0.006 Aa | 0.065±0.004 a | |
机插 MT | |||||||
宜香优2115 YXY2115 | 6.98±0.19 | 7.01±0.06 | 6.38±0.08 | 0.220±0.015 b | 0.083±0.002 Bb | 0.065±0.004 | |
F优498 FY498 | 6.90±0.18 | 6.99±0.27 | 6.43±0.24 | 0.278±0.032 a | 0.104±0.003 Aa | 0.063±0.001 | |
手插 HT | |||||||
宜香优2115 YXY21156.68±0.19 | 7.04±0.26 b | 6.98±0.13 | 6.32±0.04 | 0.240±0.027 b | 0.092±0.007 Bb | 0.059±0.001 b | |
F优498 FY498 | 7.34±0.24 a | 7.14±0.19 | 6.53±0.12 | 0.300±0.024 a | 0.113±0.009 Aa | 0.066±0.006 a | |
平均值 Mean | |||||||
机直播 MD | 6.59±0.18 Bc | 6.64±0.06 Bb | 6.14±0.01 Bb | 0.295±0.035 a | 0.099±0.015 ab | 0.062±0.004 | |
机插 MT | 6.94±0.06 ABb | 7.00±0.01Aa | 6.40±0.04Aa | 0.249±0.041 b | 0.093±0.015 b | 0.064±0.001 | |
手插 HT | 7.19±0.21 Aa | 7.06±0.11 Aa | 6.43±0.15 Aa | 0.270±0.042 ab | 0.102±0.015 a | 0.062±0.005 | |
宜香优2115 YXY2115 | 6.91±0.17 | 6.89±0.18 | 6.28±0.12 | 0.243±0.025 Bb | 0.088±0.005 Bb | 0.061±0.003 b | |
F优498 FY498 | 6.90±0.44 | 6.91±0.28 | 6.36±0.21 | 0.299±0.021Aa | 0.109±0.005Aa | 0.065±0.001a | |
F值F value | |||||||
播栽方式 PM | 30.94** | 19.59** | 24.14** | 5.31(*) | 8.80* | 0.74 | |
品种 V | 0.03 | 0.06 | 1.75 | 21.98** | 47.37** | 6.32* | |
播栽方式×品种 PM×V | 6.04* | 1.13 | 1.27 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 2.84 |
图3 不同栽插方式下籼型杂交稻穗分化期穗长变化
Fig. 3. Change of the length of panicle of indica hybrid rice at the panicle differentiation stage in various planting methods.
图4 不同栽插方式下籼型杂交稻穗分化期每穗干质量变化
Fig. 4. Change of panicle dry weight of indica hybrid rice at the panicle differentiation stage in various planting methods.
图5 不同栽插方式下籼型杂交稻穗分化期穗茎干质量比变化
Fig. 5. Change of the dry weight ratio of panicle to stem of indica hybrid rice at the panicle differentiation stage in various planting methods.
播栽方式与品种 PM and V | 高效叶面积率 HELR/% | 叶面积指数 LAA | 颖花叶面积比 RSLA/(粒·cm-2) | 实粒叶面积比 RFSLA/(粒·cm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
机直播 MD | ||||
宜香优2115 YXY2115 | 68.85±1.34 | 9.92±0.19 a | 0.34±0.03 Bb | 0.31±0.01 Bb |
F优498 FY498 | 68.99±1.71 | 8.58±1.63 b | 0.55±0.06 Aa | 0.51±0.06 Aa |
机插 MT | ||||
宜香优2115 YXY2115 | 64.36±0.94 | 9.43±0.62 | 0.41±0.04 Bb | 0.35±0.05 Bb |
F优498 FY498 | 62.37±6.11 | 9.10±0.41 | 0.58±0.03 Aa | 0.53±0.03 Aa |
手插 HT | ||||
宜香优2115 YXY2115 | 66.80±1.93 | 9.70±0.24 Aa | 0.38±0.04 Bb | 0.33±0.04 Bb |
F优498 FY498 | 67.53±5.77 | 6.93±0.21 Bb | 0.68±0.05 Aa | 0.63±0.04 Aa |
平均值 Mean | ||||
机直播 MD | 68.92±0.10 | 9.25±0.94 | 0.44±0.15 b | 0.41±0.15 |
机插 MT | 63.37±1.41 | 9.26±0.23 | 0.49±0.12 ab | 0.44±0.13 |
手插 HT | 67.17±0.52 | 8.32±1.96 | 0.53±0.22 a | 0.48±0.21 |
宜香优2115 YXY2115 | 66.68±2.25 | 9.68±0.25 Aa | 0.37±0.03 Bb | 0.33±0.02 Bb |
F优498 FY498 | 66.33±3.48 | 8.21±1.13 Bb | 0.6±0.07 Aa | 0.56±0.06 Aa |
F值F value | ||||
播栽方式PM | 3.79 | 2.75 | 5.39(*) | 3.42 |
品种 V | 0.06 | 19.36** | 150.05** | 209.07** |
播栽方式×品种PM×V | 0.29 | 4.47(*) | 4.31(*) | 5.62* |
播栽方式与品种 PM and V | 粒重叶面积比 RGWLA /(mg·cm-2) | 单穗实粒重 GWPP /g | 穗长 LP /cm | 着粒密度 GD /(粒·cm-1) |
机直播 MD | ||||
宜香优2115 YXY2115 | 10.28±0.33 Bb | 3.89±0.14 Bb | 25.47±0.48 a | 5.03±0.28 Bb |
F优498 FY498 | 14.96±1.76 Aa | 5.26±0.54 Aa | 25.11±0.71 a | 7.71±0.94 Aa |
机插MT | ||||
宜香优2115 YXY2115 | 11.95±1.44 b | 4.51±0.44 Bb | 28.74±0.14 Aa | 5.33±0.32 Bb |
F优498 FY498 | 15.06±1.13a | 5.78±0.72 Aa | 26.84±0.37 Bb | 8.26±0.47 Aa |
手插 HT | ||||
宜香优2115 YXY2115 | 11.15±1.31 Bb | 4.27±0.27 Bb | 27.48±0.32 a | 5.26±0.18 Bb |
F优498 FY498 | 18.6±1.41 Aa | 6.03±0.11 Aa | 26.29±0.61 b | 8.41±0.16 Aa |
平均值 Mean | ||||
机直播 MD | 12.62±3.31 b | 4.58±0.97 | 25.29±0.25 Bc | 6.37±1.89 |
机插 MT | 13.51±2.2 ab | 5.15±0.90 | 27.79±1.35 Aa | 6.79±2.08 |
手插 HT | 14.87±5.27 a | 5.15±1.25 | 26.88±0.84 Ab | 6.84±2.23 |
宜香优2115 YXY2115 | 11.13±0.83 Bb | 4.23±0.31 Bb | 27.23±1.65 Aa | 5.21±0.16 Bb |
F优498 FY498 | 16.21±2.07 Aa | 5.69±0.39 Aa | 26.08±0.88 Bb | 8.13±0.37 Aa |
F值F value | ||||
播栽方式PM | 4.13 | 5.39(*) | 47.19** | 2.09 |
品种 V | 86.39** | 150.05** | 22.17** | 171.41** |
播栽方式×品种PM×V | 5.38* | 4.31(*) | 3.36 | 0.38 |
表2 不同播栽方式下杂交籼稻粒叶比及收获后穗部性状
Table 2 Grain leaf ratio and character of harvested panicle of indica hybrid rice in different planting methods.
播栽方式与品种 PM and V | 高效叶面积率 HELR/% | 叶面积指数 LAA | 颖花叶面积比 RSLA/(粒·cm-2) | 实粒叶面积比 RFSLA/(粒·cm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
机直播 MD | ||||
宜香优2115 YXY2115 | 68.85±1.34 | 9.92±0.19 a | 0.34±0.03 Bb | 0.31±0.01 Bb |
F优498 FY498 | 68.99±1.71 | 8.58±1.63 b | 0.55±0.06 Aa | 0.51±0.06 Aa |
机插 MT | ||||
宜香优2115 YXY2115 | 64.36±0.94 | 9.43±0.62 | 0.41±0.04 Bb | 0.35±0.05 Bb |
F优498 FY498 | 62.37±6.11 | 9.10±0.41 | 0.58±0.03 Aa | 0.53±0.03 Aa |
手插 HT | ||||
宜香优2115 YXY2115 | 66.80±1.93 | 9.70±0.24 Aa | 0.38±0.04 Bb | 0.33±0.04 Bb |
F优498 FY498 | 67.53±5.77 | 6.93±0.21 Bb | 0.68±0.05 Aa | 0.63±0.04 Aa |
平均值 Mean | ||||
机直播 MD | 68.92±0.10 | 9.25±0.94 | 0.44±0.15 b | 0.41±0.15 |
机插 MT | 63.37±1.41 | 9.26±0.23 | 0.49±0.12 ab | 0.44±0.13 |
手插 HT | 67.17±0.52 | 8.32±1.96 | 0.53±0.22 a | 0.48±0.21 |
宜香优2115 YXY2115 | 66.68±2.25 | 9.68±0.25 Aa | 0.37±0.03 Bb | 0.33±0.02 Bb |
F优498 FY498 | 66.33±3.48 | 8.21±1.13 Bb | 0.6±0.07 Aa | 0.56±0.06 Aa |
F值F value | ||||
播栽方式PM | 3.79 | 2.75 | 5.39(*) | 3.42 |
品种 V | 0.06 | 19.36** | 150.05** | 209.07** |
播栽方式×品种PM×V | 0.29 | 4.47(*) | 4.31(*) | 5.62* |
播栽方式与品种 PM and V | 粒重叶面积比 RGWLA /(mg·cm-2) | 单穗实粒重 GWPP /g | 穗长 LP /cm | 着粒密度 GD /(粒·cm-1) |
机直播 MD | ||||
宜香优2115 YXY2115 | 10.28±0.33 Bb | 3.89±0.14 Bb | 25.47±0.48 a | 5.03±0.28 Bb |
F优498 FY498 | 14.96±1.76 Aa | 5.26±0.54 Aa | 25.11±0.71 a | 7.71±0.94 Aa |
机插MT | ||||
宜香优2115 YXY2115 | 11.95±1.44 b | 4.51±0.44 Bb | 28.74±0.14 Aa | 5.33±0.32 Bb |
F优498 FY498 | 15.06±1.13a | 5.78±0.72 Aa | 26.84±0.37 Bb | 8.26±0.47 Aa |
手插 HT | ||||
宜香优2115 YXY2115 | 11.15±1.31 Bb | 4.27±0.27 Bb | 27.48±0.32 a | 5.26±0.18 Bb |
F优498 FY498 | 18.6±1.41 Aa | 6.03±0.11 Aa | 26.29±0.61 b | 8.41±0.16 Aa |
平均值 Mean | ||||
机直播 MD | 12.62±3.31 b | 4.58±0.97 | 25.29±0.25 Bc | 6.37±1.89 |
机插 MT | 13.51±2.2 ab | 5.15±0.90 | 27.79±1.35 Aa | 6.79±2.08 |
手插 HT | 14.87±5.27 a | 5.15±1.25 | 26.88±0.84 Ab | 6.84±2.23 |
宜香优2115 YXY2115 | 11.13±0.83 Bb | 4.23±0.31 Bb | 27.23±1.65 Aa | 5.21±0.16 Bb |
F优498 FY498 | 16.21±2.07 Aa | 5.69±0.39 Aa | 26.08±0.88 Bb | 8.13±0.37 Aa |
F值F value | ||||
播栽方式PM | 4.13 | 5.39(*) | 47.19** | 2.09 |
品种 V | 86.39** | 150.05** | 22.17** | 171.41** |
播栽方式×品种PM×V | 5.38* | 4.31(*) | 3.36 | 0.38 |
器官 Organ | 机直播 MD | 机插 MT | 手插 HT | 宜香优2115 YXY2115 | F优498 F you 498 | F值 F value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
播栽 方式 PM | 品种 V | 播栽方式×品种 PM×V | ||||||
叶 Leaf | ||||||||
24DBH | 1.06±0.14 | 0.93±0.04 | 1.11±0.38 | 0.92±0.07Bb | 1.15±0.24Aa | 3.57 | 39.03** | 22.48** |
20DBH | 1.15±0.17 Aa | 1.06±0.01 Bb | 1.12±0.08 ABa | 1.05±0.02 Bb | 1.17±0.11 Aa | 11.74* | 15.17** | 5.95* |
16DBH | 1.07±0.12 | 1.17±0.09 | 1.22±0.04 | 1.17±0.07 | 1.14±0.13 | 2.06 | 4.67(*) | 33.48** |
12DBH | 1.11±0.06 b | 1.37±0.14 a | 1.28±0.15 ab | 1.20±0.07 | 1.31±0.21 | 8.40* | 2.88 | 2.14 |
8DBH | 1.11±0.04 Bb | 1.44±0.05 Aa | 1.38±0.09 ABa | 1.31±0.17 | 1.31±0.20 | 14.3* | 0.001 | 2.06 |
4DBH | 1.28±0.05 b | 1.39±0.23 ab | 1.55±0.29 a | 1.54±0.22 Aa | 1.27±0.07 Bb | 4.59(*) | 30.43** | 4.37(*) |
0DBH | 1.38±0.03 | 1.62±0.07 | 1.59±0.13 | 1.59±0.15 | 1.48±0.11 | 2.93 | 2.26 | 0.32 |
叶鞘 Sheath | ||||||||
24DBH | 0.95±0.02 | 0.92±0.02 | 0.84±0.11 | 0.88±0.10 | 0.93±0.01 | 1.35 | 2.21 | 2.51 |
20DBH | 1.05±0.03 | 1.06±0.01 | 1.05±0.09 | 1.02±0.03b | 1.08±0.03a | 0.35 | 8.05* | 2.25 |
16DBH | 1.11±0.01 | 1.16±0.06 | 1.19±0.07 | 1.12±0.02 | 1.18±0.07 | 0.28 | 2.99 | 1.04 |
12DBH | 1.12±0.1 b | 1.43±0.14 a | 1.26±0.21 ab | 1.17±0.15 Bb | 1.38±0.17 Aa | 10.44* | 35.91** | 1.65 |
8DBH | 1.15±0.04 Cc | 1.56±0.03 Aa | 1.43±0.16 Bb | 1.34±0.23 | 1.42±0.21 | 167.07** | 3.01 | 2.66 |
4DBH | 1.44±0.04 | 1.60±0.16 | 1.62±0.19 | 1.63±0.19 a | 1.48±0.01 b | 2.67 | 7.90* | 3.60(*) |
0DBH | 1.65±0.14 b | 1.88±0.09 a | 1.76±0.04 ab | 1.83±0.10 | 1.70±0.14 | 7.81 * | 2.81 | 0.35 |
茎秆 Stem | ||||||||
24DBH | 0.31±0.06 Bb | 0.39±0.02 Aa | 0.36±0.03 ABa | 0.37±0.03 | 0.34±0.06 | 16.67* | 3.02 | 4.92(*) |
20DBH | 0.49±0.02 | 0.53±0.10 | 0.49±0.08 | 0.50±0.09 | 0.50±0.04 | 1.01 | 0.02 | 9.24* |
16DBH | 0.64±0.04 Bb | 0.78±0.18 Aa | 0.59±0.03 Bb | 0.71±0.18 Aa | 0.63±0.05 Bb | 26.58** | 63.81** | 86.14** |
12DBH | 0.82±0.12 Bb | 1.05±0.07 Aa | 0.85±0.11 Bb | 0.98±0.11 Aa | 0.84±0.14 Bb | 17.28* | 32.77** | 0.79 |
8DBH | 0.99±0.08 Bc | 1.24±0.20 Aa | 1.11±0.003 Bb | 1.18±0.18 a | 1.05±0.09 b | 45.97** | 12.39* | 4.73(*) |
4DBH | 1.23±0.05 Bb | 1.39±0.24 Aa | 1.28±0.13 Bb | 1.40±0.15 Aa | 1.20±0.02 Bb | 32.03** | 15.51** | 2.25 |
0DBH | 1.42±0.25 Bb | 1.68±0.21 Aa | 1.59±0.09 Aa | 1.69±0.12 a | 1.44±0.16 b | 28.27** | 12.43* | 0.89 |
表3 不同栽插方式下杂交籼稻穗分化期各器官的干质量变化
Table 3 Change of the dry matter of different organs of indica hybrid rice in panicle differentiation stage in various planting methods.g
器官 Organ | 机直播 MD | 机插 MT | 手插 HT | 宜香优2115 YXY2115 | F优498 F you 498 | F值 F value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
播栽 方式 PM | 品种 V | 播栽方式×品种 PM×V | ||||||
叶 Leaf | ||||||||
24DBH | 1.06±0.14 | 0.93±0.04 | 1.11±0.38 | 0.92±0.07Bb | 1.15±0.24Aa | 3.57 | 39.03** | 22.48** |
20DBH | 1.15±0.17 Aa | 1.06±0.01 Bb | 1.12±0.08 ABa | 1.05±0.02 Bb | 1.17±0.11 Aa | 11.74* | 15.17** | 5.95* |
16DBH | 1.07±0.12 | 1.17±0.09 | 1.22±0.04 | 1.17±0.07 | 1.14±0.13 | 2.06 | 4.67(*) | 33.48** |
12DBH | 1.11±0.06 b | 1.37±0.14 a | 1.28±0.15 ab | 1.20±0.07 | 1.31±0.21 | 8.40* | 2.88 | 2.14 |
8DBH | 1.11±0.04 Bb | 1.44±0.05 Aa | 1.38±0.09 ABa | 1.31±0.17 | 1.31±0.20 | 14.3* | 0.001 | 2.06 |
4DBH | 1.28±0.05 b | 1.39±0.23 ab | 1.55±0.29 a | 1.54±0.22 Aa | 1.27±0.07 Bb | 4.59(*) | 30.43** | 4.37(*) |
0DBH | 1.38±0.03 | 1.62±0.07 | 1.59±0.13 | 1.59±0.15 | 1.48±0.11 | 2.93 | 2.26 | 0.32 |
叶鞘 Sheath | ||||||||
24DBH | 0.95±0.02 | 0.92±0.02 | 0.84±0.11 | 0.88±0.10 | 0.93±0.01 | 1.35 | 2.21 | 2.51 |
20DBH | 1.05±0.03 | 1.06±0.01 | 1.05±0.09 | 1.02±0.03b | 1.08±0.03a | 0.35 | 8.05* | 2.25 |
16DBH | 1.11±0.01 | 1.16±0.06 | 1.19±0.07 | 1.12±0.02 | 1.18±0.07 | 0.28 | 2.99 | 1.04 |
12DBH | 1.12±0.1 b | 1.43±0.14 a | 1.26±0.21 ab | 1.17±0.15 Bb | 1.38±0.17 Aa | 10.44* | 35.91** | 1.65 |
8DBH | 1.15±0.04 Cc | 1.56±0.03 Aa | 1.43±0.16 Bb | 1.34±0.23 | 1.42±0.21 | 167.07** | 3.01 | 2.66 |
4DBH | 1.44±0.04 | 1.60±0.16 | 1.62±0.19 | 1.63±0.19 a | 1.48±0.01 b | 2.67 | 7.90* | 3.60(*) |
0DBH | 1.65±0.14 b | 1.88±0.09 a | 1.76±0.04 ab | 1.83±0.10 | 1.70±0.14 | 7.81 * | 2.81 | 0.35 |
茎秆 Stem | ||||||||
24DBH | 0.31±0.06 Bb | 0.39±0.02 Aa | 0.36±0.03 ABa | 0.37±0.03 | 0.34±0.06 | 16.67* | 3.02 | 4.92(*) |
20DBH | 0.49±0.02 | 0.53±0.10 | 0.49±0.08 | 0.50±0.09 | 0.50±0.04 | 1.01 | 0.02 | 9.24* |
16DBH | 0.64±0.04 Bb | 0.78±0.18 Aa | 0.59±0.03 Bb | 0.71±0.18 Aa | 0.63±0.05 Bb | 26.58** | 63.81** | 86.14** |
12DBH | 0.82±0.12 Bb | 1.05±0.07 Aa | 0.85±0.11 Bb | 0.98±0.11 Aa | 0.84±0.14 Bb | 17.28* | 32.77** | 0.79 |
8DBH | 0.99±0.08 Bc | 1.24±0.20 Aa | 1.11±0.003 Bb | 1.18±0.18 a | 1.05±0.09 b | 45.97** | 12.39* | 4.73(*) |
4DBH | 1.23±0.05 Bb | 1.39±0.24 Aa | 1.28±0.13 Bb | 1.40±0.15 Aa | 1.20±0.02 Bb | 32.03** | 15.51** | 2.25 |
0DBH | 1.42±0.25 Bb | 1.68±0.21 Aa | 1.59±0.09 Aa | 1.69±0.12 a | 1.44±0.16 b | 28.27** | 12.43* | 0.89 |
图6 不同栽插方式下杂交籼稻穗分化期各器官干物质分配比例变化
Fig.6. Change of the ratio of dry matter in different organs at the panicle differentiation stage of indica hybrid rice in different planting methods.
播栽方式与品种 PM and V | 单茎干物重 DMWS/g | 群体干物重 DMWP(t· hm-2) | 群体生长率 CGR/(g· m-2d-2) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
拔节期 Jointing | 抽穗期 Heading | 成熟期 Maturit y | 拔节期 Jointing | 抽穗期 Heading | 成熟期 Maturity | 播种-拔节 S-J | 拔节-抽穗 J-H | 抽穗-成熟 H-M | |
机直播 MD | |||||||||
宜香优2115 YXY2115 | 1.42±0.09Bb | 4.66±0.20 | 7.67±0.43 | 4.79±0.21 | 13.05±1.12 | 20.33±0.98 | 15.65±1.48 | 22.31±3.60 | 15.50±2.35 |
F优498 FY498 | 1.94±0.08 Aa | 4.53±0.21 | 7.50±0.60 | 5.12±0.94 | 12.85±1.87 | 18.68±3.05 | 15.98±2.26 | 23.42±3.25 | 13.55±3.00 |
机插 MT | |||||||||
宜香优2115 YXY2115 | 1.49±0.12 Bb | 5.63±0.44 | 8.05±0.36 b | 4.40±0.73 | 13.55±1.12 | 20.27±1.39 | 13.69±1.44 | 22.86±1.20 | 15.28±1.70 |
F优498 FY498 | 1.85±0.09 Aa | 5.61±0.22 | 9.66±1.23 a | 4.46±0.15 | 13.88±0.34 | 21.43±0.62 | 14.35±0.45 | 26.16±1.04 | 17.98±0.99 |
手插 HT | |||||||||
宜香优2115 YXY2115 | 1.44±0.09 Bb | 4.9±0.17 b | 7.42±0.53 Bb | 4.66±0.35 | 13.31±0.87 | 18.9±1.78 | 13.32±1.52 | 24.70±3.44 | 11.66±1.92b |
F优498 FY498 | 1.77±0.02 Aa | 5.69±0.39 a | 9.49±0.23 Aa | 4.54±0.26 | 12.57±1.06 | 20.00±0.83 | 12.71±1.33 | 25.10±3.15 | 16.86±0.71a |
平均值 Mean | |||||||||
机直播 MD | 1.68±0.37 | 4.59±0.09 Bb | 7.58±0.12 b | 4.95±0.23 a | 12.95±0.14 | 19.50±1.17 | 15.82±0.23 a | 22.87±0.79 | 14.53±1.38 |
机插 MT | 1.67±0.25 | 5.62±0.02 Aa | 8.86±1.14 a | 4.43±0.04 b | 13.71±0.23 | 20.85±0.82 | 14.02±0.46 ab | 24.9±2.34 | 16.63±1.91 |
手插 HT | 1.61±0.23 | 5.29±0.56 ABa | 8.46±1.46 ab | 4.6±0.08 ab | 12.94±0.52 | 19.45±0.77 | 13.01±0.43 b | 24.51±0.28 | 14.26±3.68 |
宜香优2115 YXY2115 | 1.45±0.04 Bb | 5.06±0.51 | 7.72±0.32 b | 4.62±0.20 | 13.30±0.25 | 19.83±0.81 | 14.22±1.25 | 23.29±1.25 | 14.15±2.15 |
F优498 FY498 | 1.85±0.08 Aa | 5.28±0.64 | 8.88±1.20 a | 4.71±0.36 | 13.10±0.69 | 20.03±1.38 | 14.35±1.63 | 24.89±1.38 | 16.13±2.30 |
F值 F value | |||||||||
播栽方式PM | 4.12 | 15.68* | 4.98 | 7.06* | 0.81 | 0.93 | 4.56 | 0.88 | 2.28 |
品种 V | 62.70** | 2.23 | 13.24* | 0.09 | 0.16 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 1.26 | 3.88 |
播栽方式×品种PM×V | 1.40 | 4.11 | 4.53 | 0.19 | 0.37 | 1.66 | 0.38 | 0.38 | 4.32 |
表4 不同栽插方式下杂交籼稻各生育时期物质积累与群体生长率
Table 4 Dry matter weight during various growth stage and crop growth rate of indica hybrid rice in different planting methods.
播栽方式与品种 PM and V | 单茎干物重 DMWS/g | 群体干物重 DMWP(t· hm-2) | 群体生长率 CGR/(g· m-2d-2) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
拔节期 Jointing | 抽穗期 Heading | 成熟期 Maturit y | 拔节期 Jointing | 抽穗期 Heading | 成熟期 Maturity | 播种-拔节 S-J | 拔节-抽穗 J-H | 抽穗-成熟 H-M | |
机直播 MD | |||||||||
宜香优2115 YXY2115 | 1.42±0.09Bb | 4.66±0.20 | 7.67±0.43 | 4.79±0.21 | 13.05±1.12 | 20.33±0.98 | 15.65±1.48 | 22.31±3.60 | 15.50±2.35 |
F优498 FY498 | 1.94±0.08 Aa | 4.53±0.21 | 7.50±0.60 | 5.12±0.94 | 12.85±1.87 | 18.68±3.05 | 15.98±2.26 | 23.42±3.25 | 13.55±3.00 |
机插 MT | |||||||||
宜香优2115 YXY2115 | 1.49±0.12 Bb | 5.63±0.44 | 8.05±0.36 b | 4.40±0.73 | 13.55±1.12 | 20.27±1.39 | 13.69±1.44 | 22.86±1.20 | 15.28±1.70 |
F优498 FY498 | 1.85±0.09 Aa | 5.61±0.22 | 9.66±1.23 a | 4.46±0.15 | 13.88±0.34 | 21.43±0.62 | 14.35±0.45 | 26.16±1.04 | 17.98±0.99 |
手插 HT | |||||||||
宜香优2115 YXY2115 | 1.44±0.09 Bb | 4.9±0.17 b | 7.42±0.53 Bb | 4.66±0.35 | 13.31±0.87 | 18.9±1.78 | 13.32±1.52 | 24.70±3.44 | 11.66±1.92b |
F优498 FY498 | 1.77±0.02 Aa | 5.69±0.39 a | 9.49±0.23 Aa | 4.54±0.26 | 12.57±1.06 | 20.00±0.83 | 12.71±1.33 | 25.10±3.15 | 16.86±0.71a |
平均值 Mean | |||||||||
机直播 MD | 1.68±0.37 | 4.59±0.09 Bb | 7.58±0.12 b | 4.95±0.23 a | 12.95±0.14 | 19.50±1.17 | 15.82±0.23 a | 22.87±0.79 | 14.53±1.38 |
机插 MT | 1.67±0.25 | 5.62±0.02 Aa | 8.86±1.14 a | 4.43±0.04 b | 13.71±0.23 | 20.85±0.82 | 14.02±0.46 ab | 24.9±2.34 | 16.63±1.91 |
手插 HT | 1.61±0.23 | 5.29±0.56 ABa | 8.46±1.46 ab | 4.6±0.08 ab | 12.94±0.52 | 19.45±0.77 | 13.01±0.43 b | 24.51±0.28 | 14.26±3.68 |
宜香优2115 YXY2115 | 1.45±0.04 Bb | 5.06±0.51 | 7.72±0.32 b | 4.62±0.20 | 13.30±0.25 | 19.83±0.81 | 14.22±1.25 | 23.29±1.25 | 14.15±2.15 |
F优498 FY498 | 1.85±0.08 Aa | 5.28±0.64 | 8.88±1.20 a | 4.71±0.36 | 13.10±0.69 | 20.03±1.38 | 14.35±1.63 | 24.89±1.38 | 16.13±2.30 |
F值 F value | |||||||||
播栽方式PM | 4.12 | 15.68* | 4.98 | 7.06* | 0.81 | 0.93 | 4.56 | 0.88 | 2.28 |
品种 V | 62.70** | 2.23 | 13.24* | 0.09 | 0.16 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 1.26 | 3.88 |
播栽方式×品种PM×V | 1.40 | 4.11 | 4.53 | 0.19 | 0.37 | 1.66 | 0.38 | 0.38 | 4.32 |
抽穗前天数与性状 Days before heading and character | 总颖花 现存数 SS | 总颖花 退化数 RS | 总颖花 分化数 DS | 总颖花 退化率 RPS | 总枝梗 退化数 RB | 总枝梗 现存数 SB | 总枝梗 分化数 DB | 总枝梗 退化率 RPB |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
24DBH | ||||||||
茎秆长 LS | -0.088 | -0.195 | -0.14 | -0.254 | -0.539* | -0.077 | -0.298 | -0.734** |
茎秆干质量 DWS | 0.168 | -0.148 | 0.048 | -0.329 | -0.293 | 0.146 | -0.048 | -0.538* |
穗长 LP | -0.139 | -0.236 | -0.191 | -0.218 | -0.509* | -0.130 | -0.316 | -0.607** |
穗干质量DWP | 0.453 | 0.151 | 0.362 | -0.063 | 0.046 | 0.468 | 0.306 | -0.300 |
20DBH | ||||||||
茎秆长 LS | -0.162 | -0.333 | -0.248 | -0.383 | -0.598** | -0.161 | -0.376 | -0.748** |
茎秆干质量 DWS | 0.161 | -0.08 | 0.072 | -0.188 | -0.039 | 0.156 | 0.077 | -0.205 |
穗长 LP | 0.157 | 0.271 | 0.219 | 0.349 | 0.409 | 0.178 | 0.299 | 0.456 |
穗干质量DWP | 0.090 | 0.057 | 0.083 | 0.078 | 0.323 | 0.076 | 0.196 | 0.412 |
16DBH | ||||||||
茎秆长 LS | -0.061 | -0.224 | -0.135 | -0.254 | -0.447 | -0.059 | -0.244 | -0.577* |
茎秆干质量 DWS | -0.111 | -0.196 | -0.156 | -0.147 | -0.394 | -0.093 | -0.239 | -0.480* |
穗长 LP | 0.410 | 0.332 | 0.411 | 0.237 | 0.497* | 0.420 | 0.486* | 0.366 |
穗干质量DWP | 0.556* | 0.486* | 0.572* | 0.335 | 0.680** | 0.560* | 0.656** | 0.525* |
12DBH | ||||||||
茎秆长 LS | -0.050 | -0.157 | -0.100 | -0.186 | -0.369 | -0.063 | -0.210 | -0.445 |
茎秆干质量 DWS | -0.109 | -0.155 | -0.138 | -0.150 | -0.509* | -0.097 | -0.296 | -0.629** |
穗长 LP | 0.475* | 0.308 | 0.443 | 0.031 | 0.350 | 0.485* | 0.457 | 0.076 |
穗干质量DWP | 0.601** | 0.507* | 0.610** | 0.265 | 0.543* | 0.625** | 0.632** | 0.258 |
8DBH | ||||||||
茎秆长 LS | 0.172 | -0.010 | 0.109 | -0.135 | -0.212 | 0.139 | -0.014 | -0.423 |
茎秆干质量 DWS | -0.119 | -0.098 | -0.120 | -0.064 | -0.393 | -0.110 | -0.25 | -0.498* |
穗长 LP | 0.314 | 0.052 | 0.229 | -0.142 | 0.031 | 0.315 | 0.206 | -0.259 |
穗干质量DWP | 0.673** | 0.329 | 0.582* | 0.017 | 0.421 | 0.674** | 0.605** | 0.039 |
4DBH | ||||||||
茎秆长 LS | 0.231 | 0.182 | 0.229 | 0.134 | 0.041 | 0.220 | 0.152 | -0.126 |
茎秆干质量 DWS | -0.403 | -0.452 | -0.457 | -0.322 | -0.674** | -0.41 | -0.563* | -0.623** |
穗长 LP | -0.221 | -0.312 | -0.278 | -0.240 | -0.567* | -0.215 | -0.394 | -0.620** |
穗干质量DWP | 0.689** | 0.469* | 0.652** | 0.230 | 0.496* | 0.677** | 0.642** | 0.171 |
0DBH | ||||||||
茎秆长 LS | 0.542* | 0.231 | 0.455 | -0.109 | -0.008 | 0.533* | 0.320 | -0.468 |
茎秆干质量 DWS | -0.230 | -0.438 | -0.337 | -0.446 | -0.654** | -0.249 | -0.456 | -0.729** |
穗长 LP | -0.378 | -0.489* | -0.456 | -0.397 | -0.783** | -0.375 | -0.592** | -0.783** |
穗干质量DWP | 0.878** | 0.677** | 0.865** | 0.310 | 0.653** | 0.871** | 0.832** | 0.209 |
表5 不同栽插方式下籼型杂交稻穗分化期茎秆和穗生长与总枝梗和总颖花性状的相关分析1)
Table 5 Correlation analysis of the growth of stem and panicle with rachis branches and spikelets characters of indica hybrid rice at the panicle differentiation stage in various planting methods(n=18).1)
抽穗前天数与性状 Days before heading and character | 总颖花 现存数 SS | 总颖花 退化数 RS | 总颖花 分化数 DS | 总颖花 退化率 RPS | 总枝梗 退化数 RB | 总枝梗 现存数 SB | 总枝梗 分化数 DB | 总枝梗 退化率 RPB |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
24DBH | ||||||||
茎秆长 LS | -0.088 | -0.195 | -0.14 | -0.254 | -0.539* | -0.077 | -0.298 | -0.734** |
茎秆干质量 DWS | 0.168 | -0.148 | 0.048 | -0.329 | -0.293 | 0.146 | -0.048 | -0.538* |
穗长 LP | -0.139 | -0.236 | -0.191 | -0.218 | -0.509* | -0.130 | -0.316 | -0.607** |
穗干质量DWP | 0.453 | 0.151 | 0.362 | -0.063 | 0.046 | 0.468 | 0.306 | -0.300 |
20DBH | ||||||||
茎秆长 LS | -0.162 | -0.333 | -0.248 | -0.383 | -0.598** | -0.161 | -0.376 | -0.748** |
茎秆干质量 DWS | 0.161 | -0.08 | 0.072 | -0.188 | -0.039 | 0.156 | 0.077 | -0.205 |
穗长 LP | 0.157 | 0.271 | 0.219 | 0.349 | 0.409 | 0.178 | 0.299 | 0.456 |
穗干质量DWP | 0.090 | 0.057 | 0.083 | 0.078 | 0.323 | 0.076 | 0.196 | 0.412 |
16DBH | ||||||||
茎秆长 LS | -0.061 | -0.224 | -0.135 | -0.254 | -0.447 | -0.059 | -0.244 | -0.577* |
茎秆干质量 DWS | -0.111 | -0.196 | -0.156 | -0.147 | -0.394 | -0.093 | -0.239 | -0.480* |
穗长 LP | 0.410 | 0.332 | 0.411 | 0.237 | 0.497* | 0.420 | 0.486* | 0.366 |
穗干质量DWP | 0.556* | 0.486* | 0.572* | 0.335 | 0.680** | 0.560* | 0.656** | 0.525* |
12DBH | ||||||||
茎秆长 LS | -0.050 | -0.157 | -0.100 | -0.186 | -0.369 | -0.063 | -0.210 | -0.445 |
茎秆干质量 DWS | -0.109 | -0.155 | -0.138 | -0.150 | -0.509* | -0.097 | -0.296 | -0.629** |
穗长 LP | 0.475* | 0.308 | 0.443 | 0.031 | 0.350 | 0.485* | 0.457 | 0.076 |
穗干质量DWP | 0.601** | 0.507* | 0.610** | 0.265 | 0.543* | 0.625** | 0.632** | 0.258 |
8DBH | ||||||||
茎秆长 LS | 0.172 | -0.010 | 0.109 | -0.135 | -0.212 | 0.139 | -0.014 | -0.423 |
茎秆干质量 DWS | -0.119 | -0.098 | -0.120 | -0.064 | -0.393 | -0.110 | -0.25 | -0.498* |
穗长 LP | 0.314 | 0.052 | 0.229 | -0.142 | 0.031 | 0.315 | 0.206 | -0.259 |
穗干质量DWP | 0.673** | 0.329 | 0.582* | 0.017 | 0.421 | 0.674** | 0.605** | 0.039 |
4DBH | ||||||||
茎秆长 LS | 0.231 | 0.182 | 0.229 | 0.134 | 0.041 | 0.220 | 0.152 | -0.126 |
茎秆干质量 DWS | -0.403 | -0.452 | -0.457 | -0.322 | -0.674** | -0.41 | -0.563* | -0.623** |
穗长 LP | -0.221 | -0.312 | -0.278 | -0.240 | -0.567* | -0.215 | -0.394 | -0.620** |
穗干质量DWP | 0.689** | 0.469* | 0.652** | 0.230 | 0.496* | 0.677** | 0.642** | 0.171 |
0DBH | ||||||||
茎秆长 LS | 0.542* | 0.231 | 0.455 | -0.109 | -0.008 | 0.533* | 0.320 | -0.468 |
茎秆干质量 DWS | -0.230 | -0.438 | -0.337 | -0.446 | -0.654** | -0.249 | -0.456 | -0.729** |
穗长 LP | -0.378 | -0.489* | -0.456 | -0.397 | -0.783** | -0.375 | -0.592** | -0.783** |
穗干质量DWP | 0.878** | 0.677** | 0.865** | 0.310 | 0.653** | 0.871** | 0.832** | 0.209 |
枝梗和颖花参数 Parameters of rachis branches and spikelets | 穗茎干质量比 Dry weight ratio of panicle to stem | 穗干质量增长速率 WIP | 茎秆干质量 增长速率 WIS | 穗与茎秆 干质量增长 速率之比 RWIPS | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
16DBH | 12DBH | 8DBH | 4DBH | 0DBH | 20DBH~ 16DBH | 16DBH~ 12DBH | 8DBH~4DBH | 8DBH~4DBH | ||
一次枝梗退化数 RPB | 0.350 | 0.345 | 0.282 | 0.338 | 0.388 | 0.226 | 0.152 | 0.193 | -0.098 | |
一次枝梗现存数 SPB | 0.737** | 0.681** | 0.567* | 0.716** | 0.901** | 0.699** | 0.621** | -0.297 | 0.540* | |
一次枝梗分化数 DPB | 0.747** | 0.690** | 0.574* | 0.726** | 0.908** | 0.698** | 0.613** | -0.271 | 0.517* | |
一次枝梗退化率 RPPB | 0.328 | 0.322 | 0.261 | 0.315 | 0.370 | 0.211 | 0.133 | 0.186 | -0.104 | |
一次颖花退化数 RPS | 0.770** | 0.608** | 0.602** | 0.755** | 0.887** | 0.783** | 0.416 | -0.349 | 0.506* | |
一次颖花分化数 DPS | 0.277 | 0.360 | 0.210 | 0.214 | 0.332 | 0.133 | 0.433 | 0.097 | 0.080 | |
一次颖花退化率 RPPS | 0.790** | 0.698** | 0.613** | 0.746** | 0.917** | 0.727** | 0.575* | -0.244 | 0.471* | |
二次枝梗退化数 RSB | 0.765** | 0.597** | 0.599** | 0.748** | 0.877** | 0.784** | 0.398 | -0.353 | 0.505* | |
二次枝梗现存数 SSB | 0.856** | 0.661** | 0.604** | 0.722** | 0.875** | 0.773** | 0.420 | -0.341 | 0.498* | |
二次枝梗分化数 DSB | 0.609** | 0.513* | 0.686** | 0.795** | 0.860** | 0.693** | 0.529* | -0.553* | 0.739** | |
二次枝梗退化率 RPSB | 0.783** | 0.633** | 0.708** | 0.828** | 0.944** | 0.792** | 0.525* | -0.493* | 0.679** | |
一次枝梗退化数 RPB | 0.627** | 0.435 | 0.210 | 0.306 | 0.445 | 0.453 | 0.105 | 0.008 | 0.063 | |
二次颖花现存数 SSS | 0.609** | 0.511* | 0.688** | 0.793** | 0.850** | 0.699** | 0.525* | -0.550* | 0.727** | |
二次颖花分化数 DSS | 0.610** | 0.502* | 0.589* | 0.765** | 0.888** | 0.693** | 0.511* | -0.602** | 0.779** | |
二次颖花退化率 RPSS | 0.381 | 0.321 | 0.056 | 0.356 | 0.529* | 0.417 | 0.276 | -0.293 | 0.516* | |
二次颖花退化数 RSS | 0.459 | 0.365 | 0.205 | 0.490* | 0.669** | 0.507* | 0.341 | -0.475* | 0.675** | |
三次枝梗退化数 RTB | 0.186 | 0.177 | 0.160 | 0.393 | 0.574* | 0.264 | 0.335 | -0.464 | 0.672** | |
三次枝梗现存数 STB | 0.300 | 0.442 | 0.511* | 0.462 | 0.523* | 0.457 | 0.636** | -0.549* | 0.568* | |
三次枝梗分化数 DTB | 0.287 | 0.356 | 0.378 | 0.499* | 0.665** | 0.412 | 0.557* | -0.571* | 0.715** | |
三次枝梗退化率 RPTB | -0.227 | -0.351 | -0.434 | -0.164 | -0.157 | -0.297 | -0.370 | 0.218 | 0.006 | |
三次颖花现存数 STS | 0.215 | 0.339 | 0.555* | 0.513* | 0.448 | 0.365 | 0.562* | -0.556* | 0.621** | |
三次颖花分化数 DTS | 0.195 | 0.287 | 0.255 | 0.39 | 0.574* | 0.329 | 0.522* | -0.550* | 0.665** | |
三次颖花退化率 RPTS | 0.196 | 0.134 | 0.085 | 0.207 | 0.239 | 0.184 | 0.067 | 0.015 | 0.178 | |
三次颖花退化数 RTS | 0.263 | 0.326 | 0.273 | 0.451 | 0.646** | 0.385 | 0.523* | -0.538* | 0.711** | |
总颖花现存数 SS | 0.605** | 0.526* | 0.686** | 0.783** | 0.845** | 0.681** | 0.555* | -0.528* | 0.713** | |
总颖花退化数RS | 0.536* | 0.461 | 0.349 | 0.609** | 0.807** | 0.605** | 0.463 | -0.531* | 0.740** | |
总颖花分化数DS | 0.625** | 0.542* | 0.599** | 0.773** | 0.898** | 0.704** | 0.562* | -0.572* | 0.783** | |
总颖花退化率 RPS | 0.358 | 0.273 | 0.040 | 0.340 | 0.512* | 0.398 | 0.220 | -0.327 | 0.505* | |
总枝梗退化数 RB | 0.777** | 0.611** | 0.557* | 0.724** | 0.906** | 0.729** | 0.451 | -0.418 | 0.611** | |
总枝梗现存数 SB | 0.604** | 0.544* | 0.682** | 0.776** | 0.854** | 0.692** | 0.582* | -0.558* | 0.732** | |
总枝梗分化数 DB | 0.728** | 0.614** | 0.673** | 0.808** | 0.940** | 0.759** | 0.563* | -0.533* | 0.729** | |
总枝梗退化率 RPB | 0.622** | 0.421 | 0.236 | 0.408 | 0.581* | 0.483* | 0.158 | -0.110 | 0.256 |
表6 不同栽插方式下籼型杂交稻茎秆和穗物质竞争与枝梗和颖花性状的关系1)
Table 6 Relationship of competing in assimilate between stem and panicle of indica hybrid rice which with branches and spikelets characters in various planting methods1)(n=18).
枝梗和颖花参数 Parameters of rachis branches and spikelets | 穗茎干质量比 Dry weight ratio of panicle to stem | 穗干质量增长速率 WIP | 茎秆干质量 增长速率 WIS | 穗与茎秆 干质量增长 速率之比 RWIPS | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
16DBH | 12DBH | 8DBH | 4DBH | 0DBH | 20DBH~ 16DBH | 16DBH~ 12DBH | 8DBH~4DBH | 8DBH~4DBH | ||
一次枝梗退化数 RPB | 0.350 | 0.345 | 0.282 | 0.338 | 0.388 | 0.226 | 0.152 | 0.193 | -0.098 | |
一次枝梗现存数 SPB | 0.737** | 0.681** | 0.567* | 0.716** | 0.901** | 0.699** | 0.621** | -0.297 | 0.540* | |
一次枝梗分化数 DPB | 0.747** | 0.690** | 0.574* | 0.726** | 0.908** | 0.698** | 0.613** | -0.271 | 0.517* | |
一次枝梗退化率 RPPB | 0.328 | 0.322 | 0.261 | 0.315 | 0.370 | 0.211 | 0.133 | 0.186 | -0.104 | |
一次颖花退化数 RPS | 0.770** | 0.608** | 0.602** | 0.755** | 0.887** | 0.783** | 0.416 | -0.349 | 0.506* | |
一次颖花分化数 DPS | 0.277 | 0.360 | 0.210 | 0.214 | 0.332 | 0.133 | 0.433 | 0.097 | 0.080 | |
一次颖花退化率 RPPS | 0.790** | 0.698** | 0.613** | 0.746** | 0.917** | 0.727** | 0.575* | -0.244 | 0.471* | |
二次枝梗退化数 RSB | 0.765** | 0.597** | 0.599** | 0.748** | 0.877** | 0.784** | 0.398 | -0.353 | 0.505* | |
二次枝梗现存数 SSB | 0.856** | 0.661** | 0.604** | 0.722** | 0.875** | 0.773** | 0.420 | -0.341 | 0.498* | |
二次枝梗分化数 DSB | 0.609** | 0.513* | 0.686** | 0.795** | 0.860** | 0.693** | 0.529* | -0.553* | 0.739** | |
二次枝梗退化率 RPSB | 0.783** | 0.633** | 0.708** | 0.828** | 0.944** | 0.792** | 0.525* | -0.493* | 0.679** | |
一次枝梗退化数 RPB | 0.627** | 0.435 | 0.210 | 0.306 | 0.445 | 0.453 | 0.105 | 0.008 | 0.063 | |
二次颖花现存数 SSS | 0.609** | 0.511* | 0.688** | 0.793** | 0.850** | 0.699** | 0.525* | -0.550* | 0.727** | |
二次颖花分化数 DSS | 0.610** | 0.502* | 0.589* | 0.765** | 0.888** | 0.693** | 0.511* | -0.602** | 0.779** | |
二次颖花退化率 RPSS | 0.381 | 0.321 | 0.056 | 0.356 | 0.529* | 0.417 | 0.276 | -0.293 | 0.516* | |
二次颖花退化数 RSS | 0.459 | 0.365 | 0.205 | 0.490* | 0.669** | 0.507* | 0.341 | -0.475* | 0.675** | |
三次枝梗退化数 RTB | 0.186 | 0.177 | 0.160 | 0.393 | 0.574* | 0.264 | 0.335 | -0.464 | 0.672** | |
三次枝梗现存数 STB | 0.300 | 0.442 | 0.511* | 0.462 | 0.523* | 0.457 | 0.636** | -0.549* | 0.568* | |
三次枝梗分化数 DTB | 0.287 | 0.356 | 0.378 | 0.499* | 0.665** | 0.412 | 0.557* | -0.571* | 0.715** | |
三次枝梗退化率 RPTB | -0.227 | -0.351 | -0.434 | -0.164 | -0.157 | -0.297 | -0.370 | 0.218 | 0.006 | |
三次颖花现存数 STS | 0.215 | 0.339 | 0.555* | 0.513* | 0.448 | 0.365 | 0.562* | -0.556* | 0.621** | |
三次颖花分化数 DTS | 0.195 | 0.287 | 0.255 | 0.39 | 0.574* | 0.329 | 0.522* | -0.550* | 0.665** | |
三次颖花退化率 RPTS | 0.196 | 0.134 | 0.085 | 0.207 | 0.239 | 0.184 | 0.067 | 0.015 | 0.178 | |
三次颖花退化数 RTS | 0.263 | 0.326 | 0.273 | 0.451 | 0.646** | 0.385 | 0.523* | -0.538* | 0.711** | |
总颖花现存数 SS | 0.605** | 0.526* | 0.686** | 0.783** | 0.845** | 0.681** | 0.555* | -0.528* | 0.713** | |
总颖花退化数RS | 0.536* | 0.461 | 0.349 | 0.609** | 0.807** | 0.605** | 0.463 | -0.531* | 0.740** | |
总颖花分化数DS | 0.625** | 0.542* | 0.599** | 0.773** | 0.898** | 0.704** | 0.562* | -0.572* | 0.783** | |
总颖花退化率 RPS | 0.358 | 0.273 | 0.040 | 0.340 | 0.512* | 0.398 | 0.220 | -0.327 | 0.505* | |
总枝梗退化数 RB | 0.777** | 0.611** | 0.557* | 0.724** | 0.906** | 0.729** | 0.451 | -0.418 | 0.611** | |
总枝梗现存数 SB | 0.604** | 0.544* | 0.682** | 0.776** | 0.854** | 0.692** | 0.582* | -0.558* | 0.732** | |
总枝梗分化数 DB | 0.728** | 0.614** | 0.673** | 0.808** | 0.940** | 0.759** | 0.563* | -0.533* | 0.729** | |
总枝梗退化率 RPB | 0.622** | 0.421 | 0.236 | 0.408 | 0.581* | 0.483* | 0.158 | -0.110 | 0.256 |
图7 不同播栽方式下杂交籼稻的生育进程 柱形图中的数值表示该时段经历的天数(d)
Fig. 7. Growing process of indica hybrid rice under different planting methods. Values in the column chart donate the number of days in that period.
指标 Index | 播栽方式 PM | 宜香优2115 Yixiangyou 2115 | F优498 F you 498 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
机直播MD | 机插MT | 手插HT | 机直播MD | 机插MT | 手插HT | ||
≥10℃积温 | 播种-拔节期 Seeding-jointing | 1518.7 | 1626.3 | 1603.1 | 1468.5 | 1583.2 | 1562.5 |
Accumulated | 拔节-孕穗期 Jointing-booting | 560.9 | 732.8 | 625.3 | 508.4 | 594.7 | 483.4 |
temperature | 孕穗-抽穗期 Booting-heading | 372.1 | 299.1 | 270.4 | 309.7 | 320.9 | 313.2 |
above10℃ | 抽穗-成熟期 Heading-maturity | 1154.2 | 1050.6 | 1170.2 | 1077.4 | 1023.8 | 1091.0 |
全生育期Whole growth duration | 3605.9 | 3708.8 | 3669.0 | 3364.0 | 3522.6 | 3450.1 | |
日照时数/h | 播种-拔节期 Seeding-jointing | 223.5 | 229.9 | 226.4 | 215.4 | 226.4 | 226.4 |
Illumination | 拔节-孕穗期 Jointing-booting | 71.1 | 116.0 | 85.6 | 52.4 | 78.8 | 43.0 |
hours | 孕穗-抽穗期 Booting-heading | 76.6 | 44.7 | 63.4 | 63.0 | 70.2 | 69.6 |
抽穗-成熟期 Heading-maturity | 107.9 | 88.5 | 103.7 | 124.1 | 94.6 | 117.6 | |
全生育期Whole growth duration | 479.1 | 479.1 | 479.1 | 454.9 | 470 | 456.6 |
表7 不同播栽方式下杂交籼稻各生育时期气象条件比较
Table 7 Comparison of the meteorologic conditions in growth stages of indica hybrid rice in different planting methods.
指标 Index | 播栽方式 PM | 宜香优2115 Yixiangyou 2115 | F优498 F you 498 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
机直播MD | 机插MT | 手插HT | 机直播MD | 机插MT | 手插HT | ||
≥10℃积温 | 播种-拔节期 Seeding-jointing | 1518.7 | 1626.3 | 1603.1 | 1468.5 | 1583.2 | 1562.5 |
Accumulated | 拔节-孕穗期 Jointing-booting | 560.9 | 732.8 | 625.3 | 508.4 | 594.7 | 483.4 |
temperature | 孕穗-抽穗期 Booting-heading | 372.1 | 299.1 | 270.4 | 309.7 | 320.9 | 313.2 |
above10℃ | 抽穗-成熟期 Heading-maturity | 1154.2 | 1050.6 | 1170.2 | 1077.4 | 1023.8 | 1091.0 |
全生育期Whole growth duration | 3605.9 | 3708.8 | 3669.0 | 3364.0 | 3522.6 | 3450.1 | |
日照时数/h | 播种-拔节期 Seeding-jointing | 223.5 | 229.9 | 226.4 | 215.4 | 226.4 | 226.4 |
Illumination | 拔节-孕穗期 Jointing-booting | 71.1 | 116.0 | 85.6 | 52.4 | 78.8 | 43.0 |
hours | 孕穗-抽穗期 Booting-heading | 76.6 | 44.7 | 63.4 | 63.0 | 70.2 | 69.6 |
抽穗-成熟期 Heading-maturity | 107.9 | 88.5 | 103.7 | 124.1 | 94.6 | 117.6 | |
全生育期Whole growth duration | 479.1 | 479.1 | 479.1 | 454.9 | 470 | 456.6 |
时段与气象因子 Period and meteorological factors | 12DBH | 抽穗期 Maturity | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
茎秆 Culm | 穗 Panicle | 茎秆 Culm | 穗 Panicle | |||||
长 Length | 干质量 DW | 长 Length | 干质量 DW | 长 Length | 干质量 DW | 长 Length | 干质量 DW | |
抽穗前31-28 d | ||||||||
最高气温 AHT | 0.448 | 0.768** | -0.289 | -0.102 | 0.284 | 0.671** | 0.768** | -0.089 |
最低气温 ALT | 0.530* | 0.807** | -0.347 | -0.193 | 0.109 | 0.653** | 0.892** | -0.332 |
平均气温 AT | 0.532* | 0.823** | -0.265 | -0.114 | 0.188 | 0.653** | 0.863** | -0.249 |
≥10℃积温 ATA | 0.532* | 0.823** | -0.265 | -0.114 | 0.188 | 0.653** | 0.863** | -0.249 |
日照时数 IH | 0.064 | 0.097 | 0.476* | 0.424 | 0.310 | -0.051 | -0.111 | 0.299 |
抽穗前23-20 d | ||||||||
最高气温 AHT | 0.075 | 0.378 | -0.713** | -0.411 | 0.173 | 0.615** | 0.460 | 0.067 |
最低气温 ALT | 0.505* | 0.515* | -0.029 | -0.295 | 0.337 | 0.380 | 0.585* | -0.270 |
平均气温 AT | 0.492* | 0.752** | -0.562* | -0.529* | 0.413 | 0.806** | 0.864** | -0.170 |
≥10℃积温 ATA | 0.492* | 0.752** | -0.562* | -0.529* | 0.413 | 0.806** | 0.864** | -0.170 |
日照时数 IH | -0.284 | -0.105 | -0.373 | -0.009 | -0.125 | 0.106 | -0.113 | 0.223 |
抽穗前15-12 d | ||||||||
最高气温 AHT | 0.656** | 0.913** | -0.235 | -0.247 | 0.420 | 0.750** | 0.953** | -0.235 |
最低气温 ALT | 0.141 | 0.263 | 0.170 | 0.370 | -0.211 | 0.024 | 0.210 | -0.134 |
平均气温 AT | 0.668** | 0.816** | -0.046 | -0.192 | 0.383 | 0.585* | 0.854** | -0.300 |
≥10℃积温 ATA | 0.668** | 0.816** | -0.046 | -0.192 | 0.383 | 0.585* | 0.854** | -0.300 |
日照时数 IH | 0.600** | 0.867** | -0.415 | -0.385 | 0.361 | 0.787** | 0.959** | -0.263 |
表8 穗分化期气象因子与穗茎生长的关系(n=18)
Table 8 Relationship of meteorological factors with the growth traits of panicle and stem in panicle differentiation stage(n=18).
时段与气象因子 Period and meteorological factors | 12DBH | 抽穗期 Maturity | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
茎秆 Culm | 穗 Panicle | 茎秆 Culm | 穗 Panicle | |||||
长 Length | 干质量 DW | 长 Length | 干质量 DW | 长 Length | 干质量 DW | 长 Length | 干质量 DW | |
抽穗前31-28 d | ||||||||
最高气温 AHT | 0.448 | 0.768** | -0.289 | -0.102 | 0.284 | 0.671** | 0.768** | -0.089 |
最低气温 ALT | 0.530* | 0.807** | -0.347 | -0.193 | 0.109 | 0.653** | 0.892** | -0.332 |
平均气温 AT | 0.532* | 0.823** | -0.265 | -0.114 | 0.188 | 0.653** | 0.863** | -0.249 |
≥10℃积温 ATA | 0.532* | 0.823** | -0.265 | -0.114 | 0.188 | 0.653** | 0.863** | -0.249 |
日照时数 IH | 0.064 | 0.097 | 0.476* | 0.424 | 0.310 | -0.051 | -0.111 | 0.299 |
抽穗前23-20 d | ||||||||
最高气温 AHT | 0.075 | 0.378 | -0.713** | -0.411 | 0.173 | 0.615** | 0.460 | 0.067 |
最低气温 ALT | 0.505* | 0.515* | -0.029 | -0.295 | 0.337 | 0.380 | 0.585* | -0.270 |
平均气温 AT | 0.492* | 0.752** | -0.562* | -0.529* | 0.413 | 0.806** | 0.864** | -0.170 |
≥10℃积温 ATA | 0.492* | 0.752** | -0.562* | -0.529* | 0.413 | 0.806** | 0.864** | -0.170 |
日照时数 IH | -0.284 | -0.105 | -0.373 | -0.009 | -0.125 | 0.106 | -0.113 | 0.223 |
抽穗前15-12 d | ||||||||
最高气温 AHT | 0.656** | 0.913** | -0.235 | -0.247 | 0.420 | 0.750** | 0.953** | -0.235 |
最低气温 ALT | 0.141 | 0.263 | 0.170 | 0.370 | -0.211 | 0.024 | 0.210 | -0.134 |
平均气温 AT | 0.668** | 0.816** | -0.046 | -0.192 | 0.383 | 0.585* | 0.854** | -0.300 |
≥10℃积温 ATA | 0.668** | 0.816** | -0.046 | -0.192 | 0.383 | 0.585* | 0.854** | -0.300 |
日照时数 IH | 0.600** | 0.867** | -0.415 | -0.385 | 0.361 | 0.787** | 0.959** | -0.263 |
[1] | 丁颖, 李乃铭, 徐雪宾. 水稻幼穗发育和谷粒充实过程的观察. 农业学报, 1959, (10): 59-85. |
Ding Y, Li N M, Xu X B.Observation of panicle development and courses of gain of rice.Agric Sci, 1959, (10): 59-85. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 刘利, 雷小龙, 王丽, 等.种植方式对杂交稻枝梗和颖花分化及退化的影响. 作物学报, 2013, 39(8): 1434-1444. |
Liu L, Lei X L, Wang L, et al.Effect of planting method on differentiation and retrogression of branches and spikelets of hybrid rice cultivar.Acta Agron Sin, 2013, 39(8): 1434-1444. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 娄伟平, 孙永飞, 张寒, 等. 温度对每穗颖花数的影响. 浙江农业学报, 2005, 17(2): 101-105. |
Lou W P, Sun Y F, Zhang H, et al.Effects of temperatures on spikelets per panicle of rice.Acta Agric Zhejiangensis, 2005, 17(2): 101-105. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 曾研华, 张玉屏, 向镜, 等. 籼型常规早稻穗分化期低温对颖花形成和籽粒充实的影响. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(7): 2007-2014. |
Zeng Y H, Zhang Y P, Xiang J, et al.Effects of low temperature on formation of spikelets and grain filling of indica inbred rice during panicle initiation in early-season.Chin J Appl Ecol, 2015, 26(7): 2007-2014. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 李刚华, 王惠芝, 王绍华, 等. 穗肥对水稻穗分化期碳氮代谢及颖花数的影响. 南京农业大学学报, 2010, 33(1): 1-5. |
Li G H, Wang H Z, Wang S H, et al.Effect of nitrogen applied at rice panicle initiation stage on carbon and nitrogen metabolism and spikelets per panicle.J Nanjing Agric Univ, 2010, 33(1): 1-5. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 王惠芝, 尤娟, 王绍华, 等. 迟熟中粳稻穗茎生长与每穗颖花数的关系. 作物学报, 2007, 33(5): 820-825. |
Wang H Z, You J, Wang S H, et al.Relationship between panicle and stem growth and spikelets per panicle in late-maturing medium japoncia rice.Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33(5): 820-825. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 杨世民, 谢力, 郑顺林, 等. 氮肥水平和栽插密度对杂交稻茎秆理化特性与抗倒伏性的影响. 作物学报,2009, 35(1): 93-103. |
Yang S M, Xie L, Zheng S L, et al.Effects of nitrogen rate and transplanting density on physical and chemical characteristics and lodging resistance of culms in hybrid rice.Acta Agron Sin, 2009, 35(1): 93-103. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 李国辉, 钟旭华, 田卡, 等. 施氮对水稻茎秆抗倒伏能力的影响及其形态和力学机理. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(7): 1323-1334. |
Li G H, Zhong X H, Tian K, et al.Effect of nitrogen application on stem lodging resistance of rice and its morphological and mechanical mechanisms.Sci Agric Sin, 2013, 46(7): 1323-1334. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 陈小荣, 钟蕾, 贺晓鹏, 等. 稻穗枝梗和颖花形成的基因型及播期效应分析. 中国水稻科学, 2006, 20(4): 424-428. |
Chen X R, Zhong L, He X P, et al.Effects of genotype and seeding-date on formation of branches and spikelets in rice panicle.Chin J Rice Sci, 2006, 20(4): 424-428. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 曾研华, 张玉屏, 王亚梁, 等. 籼粳杂交稻枝梗和颖花形成的播期效应. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(7): 1300-1310. |
Zeng Y H, Zhang Y P, Wang Y L, et al.Effect of sowing date on formation of branches and spikelets in indica japonica hybrid rice.Sci Agric Sin, 2015, 48(7): 1300-1310. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 凌启鸿. 水稻茎秆维管束数与穗部性状关系及其应用的研究. 江苏农学院学报, 1982, (3): 48-58. |
Ling Q H.The relationship between the number of macro-vascular bundles in culm and the panicle characters in rice plant and its application.J Jiangsu Agric Coll, 1982,(3): 48-58. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 苏祖芳. 水稻单茎茎鞘重与产量形成关系及其高产栽培途径的探讨. 江苏农学院学报, 1993, 14(1): 37-39. |
Sun Z F.Discussion on the relationship between the culm-sheath weight per shoot and yield in rice and its cultural approaches of high yield.Acad J Jiangsu Agric Coll, 1993, 14(1): 37-39. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | Takai T, Matsuura S, Nisiho T, et al.Rice yield potenital is closely related to crop growth rate duirng late reproductive peirod.Field Crops Res,2006,96:328-335. |
[14] | 雷小龙, 刘利, 刘波, 等. 杂交籼稻机械化种植的分蘖特性. 作物学报, 2014, 40(6): 104-1055. |
Lei X L, Liu L, Liu B, et al.Tillering characteristics of indica hybrid rice under mechanized planting.Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40(6): 104-1055. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 刘利, 雷小龙, 黄光忠, 等. 机械化播栽对杂交稻氮素积累分配及碳氮比的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(4): 831-844. |
Liu L, Lei X L, Huang G Z, et al.Influences of mechanical sowing and transplanting on nitrogen accumulation, distribution and C/N of hybrid rice cultivars.J Plant Nutr Fert, 2014, 20(4): 831-844. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 雷小龙, 刘利, 苟文, 等.种植方式对杂交籼稻植株抗倒伏特性的影响. 作物学报, 2013, 39(10): 1814-1825. |
Lei X L, Liu L, Gou w, et al. Effects of planting methods on culm lodging resistance of indica hybrid rjce(Oryza sativa L.).Acta Agron Sin, 2013, 39(10): 1814-1825. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 田青兰, 刘波, 钟晓媛, 等. 不同播栽方式下杂交籼稻非结构性碳水化合物与枝梗和颖花形成及产量性状的关系. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(1): 35-53. |
Tian Q L, Liu B, Zhong X Y, et al.Relationship of NSC with the formation of branches and spikelets and the yield traits of indica hybrid rice in different planting methods.Sci Agric Sin, 2016, 49(1): 35-53. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 冯永祥, 徐正进, 王聪. 水稻株型的研究进展. 内蒙古民族大学学报:自然科学版, 2003, 18(3): 260-264. |
Feng Y X, Xu Z J, Wang C.Advance on research of rice plant type.J Inner Mon Univ, 2003, 18(3): 260-264. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 艾志勇, 马国辉. 超高产杂交稻茎秆特征与抗倒性关系研究. 杂交水稻, 2010, 25(6): 65-69. |
Ai Z Y, Ma G H.Studies on relationship between culm characteristics and lodging resistance of super-high-yield hybrid rice.Hybrid Rice, 2010, 25(6): 65-69. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 马均, 马文波, 田彦华, 等. 重穗型水稻植株抗倒伏能力的研究. 作物学报, 2004, 30(2): 143-148. |
Ma J, Ma W B, Tian Y H, et al.The culm lodging resistance of heavy panicle type of rice.Acta Agron Sin, 2004, 30(2): 143-148. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 吴晓然, 张巫军, 伍龙梅, 等. 超级杂交籼稻抗倒能力比较及其对氮素的响应. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(14): 2705-2717. |
Wu X R, Zhang W J, Wu L M, et al, Tang S, Ding C Q, Zhang S H, Ding Y F. Characteristics of lodging resistance of super-hybrid indica rice and its response to nitrogen.Sci Agric Sin, 2015, 48(14): 2705-2717. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 龚振平. 不同营养水平水稻株高及构成变化的研究. 黑龙江农业科学, 1997, 19(6): 18-20. |
Gong Z P.Plant height and its constitutive variation the conditions of different fertilities in rice.Heilongjiang Agric Sci, 1997, 19(6): 18-20.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 凌启鸿, 张洪程, 苏祖芳, 等. 稻作新理论——水稻叶龄模式. 北京: 科学出版社, 1994:19-82. |
Ling Q H, Zhang H C, Su Z F, et al.New Theory of Rice—Rice Leaf Age Model. Beijing: Science Press, 1994, 19-82. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 杨惠杰, 房贤涛, 何花榕, 等. 福建超级稻品种茎秆结构特征及其与抗倒性和产量的关系. 中国生态农业学报, 2012, 20(7): 909-913. |
Yang H J, Fang X T, He H R, et al.Relationship of characteristics of culm construction to lodging resistance and yield of Fujian-bred super-rice cultivars.Chin J Eco-Agric, 2012, 20(7): 909-913. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 赵黎明, 萧长亮, 顾春梅, 等.植物生长调节剂在水稻倒伏上的研究进展. 北方水稻, 2009, 39(3): 114-117. |
Zhao L M, Xiao C L, Gu C M, et al.Research advantage of plant growth regulation on lodging rice.North Rice, 2009, 39(3): 114-117. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | Horie T, Shiraiwa T, Homma K, et al.Can yields of lowland rice resume the increases that they showed in the 1980s?Plant Prod Sci, 2005,8(3): 259-274. |
[27] | 王亚梁, 张玉屏, 曾研华, 等. 水稻穗形成期高温影响的研究进展. 浙江农业科学, 2014(11): 1681-1685. |
Wang Y L, Zhang Y P, Zeng Y H, et al. Research progress of effect of high temperature on rice panicle formation stage, Zhejiang Agric Sci, 2014(11): 1681-1685. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | 姚有礼, 王余龙, 蔡建中. 水稻大穗形成机理的研究(3)品种间每穗颖花现存数与颖花分化和抽穗期物质生产的关系. 江苏农学院学报, 1995, 16(2): 11-16. |
Yao Y L, Wang Y L, Cai J Z.Formation of large panicle in rice (3) varietal difference of survived spikelet number per panicle and its relations with differentiated spikelet number and biomass at heading.Acad J Jiangsu Agric Coll, 1995, 16(2): 11-16. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[29] | Yao Y, Yamamoto Y, Yoshida T, et al.Response of differentiated and degenerated spikelets to top-dressing, shading and day/night temperature treatments in rice cultivars with large panicles.Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 2000, 46(3): 631-641. |
[30] | 张顺堂, 张桂莲, 陈立云, 等. 高温胁迫对水稻剑叶净光合速率和叶绿素荧光参数的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2011, 25(3): 335-338. |
Zhang S T, Zhang G L, Chen L Y, et al.Effects of high temperature stress on net photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of flag leaf in rice.Chin J Rice Sci, 2011, 25(3): 335-338. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[31] | 张桂莲, 陈立云, 张顺堂, 等. 高温胁迫对水稻剑叶保护酶活性和膜透性的影响. 作物学报, 2006, 36(9): 1306-1310. |
Zhang G L, Chen L Y, Zhang S T, et al.Effect of high temperature stress on protective enzyme activities and membrane permeability of flag leaf in rice.Acta Agron Sin, 2006, 36(9): 1306-1310. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[32] | 魏金连, 潘晓华. 夜间温度升高对早稻生长发育及产量的影响. 江西农业大学学报, 2008, 30(3): 428-432. |
Pan J L, Pan X H.Effects of night temperature increase on growth and yield of early season rice.Acta Agric Univ Jiangxiensis, 2008, 30(3): 428-432. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[33] | 耿立清, 王嘉宇, 陈温福. 孕穗-灌浆期低温对水稻穗部性状的影响. 华北农学报, 2009, 24(3): 107-111. |
Geng L Q, Wang J Y, Chen W F.Effect of low temperature on panicle characters of rice during booting and grain filling period.Acta Agric Boreali-Sin, 2009, 24(3): 107-111. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[34] | 杨东, 段留生, 谢华安, 等. 花前光照亏缺对水稻物质积累及生理特性的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2011, 19(2): 347-352. |
Yang D, Duan L S, Xie H A, Li Z H, Huang T X.Effect of pre-flowering light deficiency on biomass accumulation and physiological characteristics of rice.Chin J Eco-Agric, 2011, 19(2): 347-352. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[35] | 谭孟祥, 景元书, 薛杨, 等. 水层深度对早稻有穗分化期遭遇低温过程时叶片生理特性的影响. 中国农业气象, 2015, 36(5): 553-560. |
Tan M X, Jing Y S, Xue Y, et al.Effects of different water depth on leaf physiological characteristics of early rice during panicle primordium suffered to low temperature.Chin J Agrometeorol,2015, 36(5): 553-560. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 郭展, 张运波. 水稻对干旱胁迫的生理生化响应及分子调控研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 335-349. |
[2] | 韦还和, 马唯一, 左博源, 汪璐璐, 朱旺, 耿孝宇, 张翔, 孟天瑶, 陈英龙, 高平磊, 许轲, 霍中洋, 戴其根. 盐、干旱及其复合胁迫对水稻产量和品质形成影响的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 350-363. |
[3] | 许丹洁, 林巧霞, 李正康, 庄小倩, 凌宇, 赖美玲, 陈晓婷, 鲁国东. OsOPR10正调控水稻对稻瘟病和白叶枯病的抗性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 364-374. |
[4] | 候小琴, 王莹, 余贝, 符卫蒙, 奉保华, 沈煜潮, 谢杭军, 王焕然, 许用强, 武志海, 王建军, 陶龙兴, 符冠富. 黄腐酸钾提高水稻秧苗耐盐性的作用途径分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 409-421. |
[5] | 胡继杰, 胡志华, 张均华, 曹小闯, 金千瑜, 章志远, 朱练峰. 根际饱和溶解氧对水稻分蘖期光合及生长特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 437-446. |
[6] | 刘福祥, 甄浩洋, 彭焕, 郑刘春, 彭德良, 文艳华. 广东省水稻孢囊线虫病调查与鉴定[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 456-461. |
[7] | 陈浩田, 秦缘, 钟笑涵, 林晨语, 秦竞航, 杨建昌, 张伟杨. 水稻根系和土壤性状与稻田甲烷排放关系的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 233-245. |
[8] | 缪军, 冉金晖, 徐梦彬, 卜柳冰, 王平, 梁国华, 周勇. 过量表达异三聚体G蛋白γ亚基基因RGG2提高水稻抗旱性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 246-255. |
[9] | 尹潇潇, 张芷菡, 颜绣莲, 廖蓉, 杨思葭, 郭岱铭, 樊晶, 赵志学, 王文明. 多个稻曲病菌效应因子的信号肽验证和表达分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 256-265. |
[10] | 朱裕敬, 桂金鑫, 龚成云, 罗新阳, 石居斌, 张海清, 贺记外. 全基因组关联分析定位水稻分蘖角度QTL[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 266-276. |
[11] | 赵艺婷, 谢可冉, 高逖, 崔克辉. 水稻分蘖期干旱锻炼对幼穗分化期高温下穗发育和产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 277-289. |
[12] | 魏倩倩, 汪玉磊, 孔海民, 徐青山, 颜玉莲, 潘林, 迟春欣, 孔亚丽, 田文昊, 朱练峰, 曹小闯, 张均华, 朱春权. 信号分子硫化氢参与硫肥缓解铝对水稻生长抑制作用的机制[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 290-302. |
[13] | 周甜, 吴少华, 康建宏, 吴宏亮, 杨生龙, 王星强, 李昱, 黄玉峰. 不同种植模式对水稻籽粒淀粉含量及淀粉关键酶活性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 303-315. |
[14] | 关雅琪, 鄂志国, 王磊, 申红芳. 影响中国水稻生产环节外包发展因素的实证研究:基于群体效应视角[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 324-334. |
[15] | 许用强, 姜宁, 奉保华, 肖晶晶, 陶龙兴, 符冠富. 水稻开花期高温热害响应机理及其调控技术研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(2): 111-126. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||