机插方式和密度对不同穗型水稻品种产量及其构成的影响

doi:10.16819/j.1001-7216.2016.6015

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探明不同机插方式下水稻适用穗型和适宜栽插规格,阐明不同机插方式下不同穗型水稻品种产量形成特征,选用大、中和小穗型各2个品种为试验材料,设置钵苗机插(行距33 cm)、行距30 cm毯苗机插和行距25 cm毯苗机插3种机插方式(记为A、B、C),研究机插方式和密度对不同穗型水稻品种产量及其形成和穗部性状的影响。钵苗机插设置3种株距,分别为12 cm、14 cm和16 cm(记为1、2、3),2种行距毯苗机插设置5种株距,分别为10 cm、11.7 cm、13.3 cm、14.8 cm、16 cm(记为1、2、3、4、5)。研究结果表明:1)钵苗机插,随着密度降低,大穗型品种产量呈先增后减,以A2最高;中、小穗型品种产量呈递减趋势,以A1最高。毯苗机插,随着密度降低,大穗型品种B方式产量呈先增后减,以B4最高,C方式呈递增趋势,以C5最高;中穗型品种B和C方式产量均呈先增后减,分别以B3和C4最高;小穗型品种B方式产量呈递减趋势,以B1最高,C方式呈先增后减,以C2最高。同一密度下,钵苗机插产量显著高于毯苗机插,增产幅度表现为大穗型>中穗型>小穗型,2种行距毯苗机插差异不显著。对2种行距毯苗机插而言,同一株距下,大穗型品种B方式产量高于C方式;中穗型品种株距为10 cm、11.7 cm、13.3 cm,B方式产量高,而株距为14.8 cm、16 cm,C方式产量高;小穗型品种除株距为10 cm外,C方式较B方式具有增产优势。2)随着密度降低,不同机插方式下不同穗型品种单位面积穗数减少,每穗粒数增加,群体颖花量变化趋势与产量一致,结实率和千粒重变化不一。同一密度下,不同机插方式间单位面积穗数相当,钵苗机插每穗粒数显著高于毯苗机插,每穗粒数增幅表现为大穗型>中穗型>小穗型,结实率和千粒重差异不显著。对2种行距毯苗机插而言,同一株距下,B方式单位面积穗数少于C方式,而每穗粒数则相反。3)随着密度降低,不同机插方式下不同穗型品种穗长、着粒密度、单穗质量、一次枝梗数、一次枝梗粒数、二次枝梗数和二次枝梗粒数呈增加趋势,一、二次枝梗数比值和一、二次枝梗粒数比值呈减少趋势。同一密度下,钵苗机插穗长、着粒密度、单穗质量、一次枝梗数、一次枝梗粒数、二次枝梗数和二次枝梗粒数高于毯苗机插。因此,钵苗机插应用大穗型品种宜适当降低密度,充分发挥大穗优势,提高群体颖花量而高产;中、小穗型品种宜采用高密度栽插,增加穗数以获得高产。毯苗机插应用大穗型品种宜采用行距30 cm,适当增加株距,依靠扩大穗型而高产;中穗型品种宜采用行距30 cm,配置中等密度,协调穗粒结构而提高群体颖花量;小穗型宜采用行距25 cm,适当减少株距,通过显著增加穗数以获得高产。

关键词: 钵苗机插, 毯苗机插, 株行距, 产量, 产量构成, 穗部性状

Abstract:

In order to apply suitable panicle-typed cultivar and plant density under different mechanical transplantation methods, and clarify high-yield formation characteristics of different panicle-typed rice, an experiment was conducted in Xinghua test point of Yangzhou University during 2013 and 2014. Three panicle-typed rice including large panicle type (LPT, Yongyou 2640 and Yongyou 8), medium panicle type (MPT, Wuyunjing 24 and Ningjing 3) and small panicle type (SPT, Huaidao 5 and Huaidao 10) were field-grown. We compared three mechanically transplanted methods including mechanically transplanted pot seedling (A), mechanically transplanted carpeted seedling in row spacing of 30 cm (B), mechanically transplanted carpeted seedling in row spacing of 25 cm (C) at different plant densities, namely plant spacing of 12 cm, 14 cm and 16 cm (marked as 1, 2, 3) in A and plant spacing of 10 cm, 11.7 cm, 13.3 cm, 14.8 cm, 16 cm (marked as 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) in B and C. Yield and its formation, panicle traits were investigated. The main results were as follows: 1) for mechanically transplanted pot seedling, with declining plant density, yield of LPT increased and then reduced, peaking in A2 treatment; yield of MPT and SPT reduced, peaking in A1 treatment. For mechanically transplanted carpet seedling, with reducing plant density, yield of LPT increased and then reduced in B, peaking in B4 treatment, yield of LPT increased in C, peaking in C5 treatment; yield of MPT increased and then reduced in B and C, peaking in B3 and C4 treatment, respectively; yield of SPT reduced in B, peaking in B1 treatment, yield of SPT increased and then reduced, peaking in C2 treatment. In the same plant density, yield of mechanically transplanted pot seedling was significantly higher than mechanically transplanted carpet seedling, the range of increased yield followed a tendency of LPT>MPT>SPT, with no significant difference in B and C. For B and C, in the same plant spacing, yield of LPT was higher in B than C; yield of MPT was higher in B than C in plant spacing of 10 cm, 11.7 cm, 13.3 cm, but it was opposite at plant spacing of 14.8 cm, 16 cm; yield of SPT was higher in C than B in plant spacing of 11.7 cm, 13.3 cm, 14.8 cm, 16 cm. 2) With plant density reduced, panicle number reduced and spikelet number per panicle increased in different panicle-typed rice under different mechanically transplanted methods. At the same plant density, there was no significant difference in panicle, grain filled percentage and 1000-grain weight in different mechanically transplanted methods, but spikelet number per panicle was significantly higher in A than B or C, following a trend of LPT>MPT>SPT. For B and C, number of panicle was lower in B than in C, but it was opposite in spikelet number per panicle. 3) Panicle length, grain density, grain weight per panicle, number of primary and secondary rachis branches, number of grains of primary and secondary rachis branches were increased with plant density reduced, it was opposite in the ratio of No. of primary rachis branch to No. of secondary rachis branch and ratio of No. of grains of primary rachis branch to No. of grains of secondary rachis branch. In the same plant density, panicle length, grain density, grain weight per panicle, number of primary and secondary rachis branches, number of grains of primary and secondary rachis branches in A than in B or C. Therefore, mechanically transplanted pot seedling of LPT could reduce plant density, it was beneficial to enlarge panicle type and increase total spikelet number and yield; for MPT and SPT, higher density should be adopted to increase panicle and spikelet number per panicle for high yield. For mechanically transplanted carpet seedling of LPT, B method and wider plant spacing should be applied to expand panicle type and acquire higher yield; for MPT, B method and medium density should be applied to coordinate panicle and spikelet number per panicle to increase total spikelet number; for SPT, C method and narrow plant spacing should be applied to increase number of panicle to achieve high yield.

Key words: mechanically transplanted pot seedling, mechanically transplanted carpet seedling, plant-row spacing, yield, yield components, panicle trait

中图分类号:

胡雅杰, 钱海军, 曹伟伟, 邢志鹏, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 郭保卫. 机插方式和密度对不同穗型水稻品种产量及其构成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2016, 30(5): 493-506.

Ya-jie HU, Hai-jun QIAN, Wei-wei CAO, Zhi-peng XING, Hong-cheng ZHANG, Qi-gen DAI, Zhong-yang HUO, Ke XU, Hai-yan WEI, Bao-wei GUO. Effect of Different Mechanical Transplantation Methods and Density on Yield and Its Components of Different Panicle-typed Rice[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2016, 30(5): 493-506.

图/表 10

参考文献 37

[1]	张洪程, 龚金龙. 中国水稻种植机械化高产农艺研究现状及发展探讨. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(7): 1273-1289.
	Zhang H C, Gong J L.Research status and development discussion on high-yielding agronomy of mechanized planting rice in China.Sci Agric Sin, 2014, 47(7): 1273-1289. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	朱德峰, 陈惠哲, 徐一成. 我国水稻种植机械化的发展前景与对策. 北方水稻, 2007(5): 13-18.
	Zhu D F, Chen H Z, Xu Y C. Countermeasure and perspective of mechanization of rice planting in China. North Rice, 2007(5): 13-18. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	陆为农. 水稻生产机械化发展现状及展望. 农机科技推广, 2006(2): 13-16.
	Lu W N. Progress and development of mechanical rice production. Agric Mach Technol Ext, 2006(2): 13-16. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	宋建农, 庄乃生, 王立臣, 等. 21世纪我国水稻种植机械化发展方向. 中国农业大学学报, 2000, 5(2): 30-33.
	Song J N, Zhuang N S, Wang L C, et al.The development tendency of Chinese rice planting mechanization in the 21st century.J China Agric Univ, 2000, 5(2): 30-33.
[5]	朱德峰, 陈惠哲. 水稻机插秧发展与粮食安全. 中国稻米, 2009(6): 4-7.
	Zhu D F, Chen H Z. The development of machine transplanted rice and food security. China Rice, 2009(6): 4-7. (in Chinese)
[6]	高连兴, 赵秀荣. 机械化移栽方式对水稻产量及主要性状的影响. 农业工程学报, 2002, 18(5): 45-48.
	Gao L X, Zhao X R.Effect of mechanized transplanting methods on rice yield and rice population growth trends.Trans CSAE, 2002 18(5): 45-48. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	李杰, 杨洪建, 邓建平, 等. 对加快推进江苏省水稻机插秧发展的思考. 中国稻米, 2014, 20(1): 32-35.
	Li J, Yang H J, Deng J P, et al.Thinking of accelerating development of machine-transplanted rice in Jiangsu Province.China Rice, 2014, 20(1): 32-35.
[8]	叶厚专, 李艳大, 沈显华, 等. 不同机插行距对水稻产量的影响. 中国农机化, 2012(4): 59-62.
	Ye H Z, Li Y D, Shen X H, et al. Effects of different machine-transplanted row spacing on rice yield. Chin Agric Mech, 2012(4): 59-62. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	马振国, 潘九明. 水稻插秧机行距问题探索. 江苏农机化, 2012(3): 49.
	Ma Z G, Pan J M. Explore on problem of row spacing of mechanical rice. Jiangsu Agric Mech, 2012(3): 49. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	沈才标, 王驾清, 孙祖高, 等. 水稻窄行插秧机的引进示范. 上海农业科技, 2012(2): 51-52.
	Shen C B, Wang J Q, Sun Z G, et al. Demonstration of narrow spacing of mechanical rice. Shanghai Agric Sci Technol, 2012(2): 51-52. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	陈立才, 叶厚专, 舒时富. 8寸行距插秧机的研制与应用. 2012年中国作物学会学术年会论文摘要集. 2012: 28.
	Chen L C, Ye H Z, Shu S F.Research and application of mechanical transplanted rice of eight cun row spacing. Abstract of Crop Academic Conference in 2012. 2012: 28. (in Chinese)
[12]	陈俊义, 杨东平, 吴国良, 等. 杂粳“常优1号”机插超高产栽培技术. 上海农业科技, 2007(3): 30-31.
	Chen J Y, Yang D P, Wu G L, et al. Technology of super-high-yielding of mechanical transplanted hybrid japonica rice of changyou 1. Shanghai Agric Sci Technol, 2007(3): 30-31. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	张洪程, 赵品恒, 孙英菊, 等. 机插杂交粳稻超高产形成群体特征. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28(2): 39-44.
	Zhang H C, Zhao P H, Sun Y J, et al.Population characteristics of super high yield formation of mechanical transplanted japonica hybrid rice.Trans CSAE, 2012, 28(2): 39-44. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	黄大山. 播期、播量和移栽密度对宁粳1号机插稻产量形成及氮素吸收利用的影响. 扬州大学, 2008.
	Huang D S.Effects of Sowing Date, sowing rate and transplanting density on the yield formation and nitrogen absorption of mechanical transplanting rice Nanjing 1. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2008. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	刘强, 杨波, 段瑞华, 等. 淮北稻区不同行距机插秧对产量影响的研究. 现代农业科技, 2010(4): 83-84.
	Liu Q, Yang B, Duan R H, et al. Study on effect of yield of different row spacing mechanical rice in Huaibei region. Mod Agric Sci Technol, 2010(4): 83-84. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	邢春秋, 付有权, 闫彬. 浅谈水稻八行与六行插秧机应用效果. 垦殖与稻作, 2006(5): 74-75.
	Xing C Q, Fu Y Q, Yan B. Effect on eight and six row spacing of mechanical transplanting rice. Recl Rice Cult, 2006(5): 74-75. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	李世峰, 刘蓉蓉, 吴九林. 不同播量与移栽密度对机插水稻产量形成的影响. 作物杂志, 2008(1):71-73.
	Li S F, Liu R R, Wu J L. Effects of different sowing rates and transplanting densities on yield formation of machine-transplanted rice. Crops, 2008(1): 71-73. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	彭长青, 李世峰, 卞新民, 等. 机插水稻精确定量栽培调控技术研究. 上海农业学报, 2006, 22(1): 20-24.
	Peng C Q, Li S F, Bian X M, et al.Study on quantitative planting practice of machine-transplanted rice.Acta Agric Shanghai, 2006, 22(1): 20-24. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	吴雪源, 王依明. 不同机插密度对水稻产量的影响试验简报. 上海农业科技, 2012(3): 47-50.
	Wu X Y, Wang Y M. Bulletin effect on yield of different density of mechanical rice. Shanghai Agric Sci Technol, 2012(3): 47-50. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	Akita K, Tanaka N.Effects of planting density and planting patterns of young seedlings transplanting on the growth and yield of rice plants.Jpn J Crop Sci, 1992, 61: 80-86.
[21]	钱银飞, 张洪程, 吴文革, 等. 机插穴苗数对不同穗型粳稻品种产量及品质的影响. 作物学报, 2009, 35(9): 1689-1707.
	Qian Y F, Zhang H C, Wu W G, et al.Effects of seedlings number per hill on grain yieId and quality in different panicle types of mechanical transplanted japonica rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2009, 35(9): 1689-1707. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	李宗春, 王恒雨, 许成军, 等. 淮北地区机插稻存在问题及栽培对策. 北方水稻, 2008(4): 54-55.
	Li Z C, Wang H Y, Xu C J, et al.The problem and cultivation countermeasure of mechanical transplanting rice in Huaibei region.North Rice, 2008, (4): 54-55 (in Chinese)
[23]	张洪程, 李杰, 戴其根, 等. 机插稻“标秧、精插、稳发、早搁、优中、强后”高产栽培精确定量关键技术. 中国稻米, 2010, 16(5): 1-6.
	Zhang H C, Li J, Dai Q G, et al.The key techniques of "standardizing seedlings, precise transplanting, steady growing, earlier drainage, optimizing middle-stage, strengthening later-stage" model for precise quantitative high-yielding cultivation of mechanical transplanting rice.China Rice, 2010, 16(5): 1-6. (in Chinese)
[24]	成永芳. 日本RX-6型水稻钵苗移栽机引进试验简报. 农机与食品机械, 1999(3): 27-31.
	Cheng Y F.Bulletin trial of pot seedling of mechanical transplanted rice (RX-6) of Japan.Agric Mach Food Mach, 1999, 3: 27-31. (in Chinese)
[25]	王立臣, 王苹, 李益民, 等. 2ZPY-H530型水稻钵苗行栽机试验研究. 中国农业大学学报, 2002, 7(4): 21-24.
	Wang L C, Wang P, Li Y M, Song J N.Research on trial of pot seedling of mechanical transplanted rice (2ZPY-H530).J China Agric Univ, 2002, 7(4): 21-24. (in Chinese)
[26]	陈恒高, 张义峰, 董晓威. 新型水稻栽植机的研究. 黑龙江八一农垦大学学报, 2005, 17(4): 39-41.
	Chen H G, Zhang Y F, Dong X W.Study on a new type rice transplanting machine.J Heilongjiang August First Land Recl Univ, 2005, 17(4): 39-41. (in Chinese)
[27]	张洪程. 钵苗机插水稻生产特点及其利用的核心技术. 农机市场, 2012(8): 19-21.
	Zhang H C.Characteristic of production of pot seedling of mechanical transplanted rice and its using key technology.Agric Mach Mark, 2012, 8: 19-21. (in Chinese)
[28]	李刚华, 于林惠, 侯朋福, 等. 机插水稻适宜基本苗定量参数的获取与验证. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28(8): 98-104.
	Li G H, Yu L H, Hou P F, et al.Calculation and verification of quantitative parameters of optimal planting density of machine-transplant rice.Trans CSAE, 2012, 28(8): 98-104. (in Chinese)
[29]	邴延忠, 陈宗凯. 水稻钵苗移栽机械化技术研发与应用. 农机科技推广, 2011(4): 52.
	Bing Y Z, Chen Z K. Research and application on the technology of pot seedling of mechanical transplanted rice. Agric Mach Technol Ext, 2011(4): 52. (in Chinese)
[30]	张洪程, 朱聪聪, 霍中洋, 等. 钵苗机插水稻产量形成优势及主要生理生态特点. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(21): 50-59.
	Zhang H C, Zhu C C, Huo Z Y, et al.Advantages of yield formation and main characteristics of physiological and ecological in rice with nutrition bowl mechanical transplanting.Trans CSAE, 2013, 29(21): 50-59. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]	朱聪聪, 张洪程, 郭保卫, 等. 钵苗机插密度对不同类型水稻产量及光合物质生产特性的影响. 作物学报, 2014, 40(1): 122-133.
	Zhu C C, Zhang H C, Guo B W, et al.Effect of planting density on yield and photosynthate production characteristics in different types of rice with bowl mechanical-transplanting method.Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40: 122-133 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32]	Zhang H, Chen T T, Liu Li J, et al.Performance in grain yield and physiological traits of rice in the Yangtze River Basin of China during the last 60 yr.J Integ Agric, 2013, 12(1): 57-66.
[33]	Huang M, Zou Y B, Jiang P, et al.Relationship between grain yield and yield components in super hybrid rice.Agric Sci China, 2011, 10(10): 1537-1544.
[34]	Mohapatra P K, Sahu S K.Heterogeneity of primary branch development and spikelet survival in rice in relation to assimilates of primary branches.J Exp Bot, 1991, 42: 871-879.
[35]	高良艳, 周鸿飞. 水稻产量构成因素与产量的分析. 辽宁农业科学, 2007(1): 26-28.
	Gao L Y, Zhou H F. Relationship between yield component factors and yield in rice. Liaoning Agric Sci, 2007(1): 26-28.
[36]	曾勇军, 石庆华, 潘晓华, 等. 长江中下游双季稻高产株型特征初步研究. 作物学报, 2009, 35: 546-551.
	Zeng Y J, Shi Q H, Pan X H,et al.Preliminary study on the plant type characteristics of double cropping rice in middle and lower reaches of Changjiang River.Acta Agron Sin, 2009, 35: 546-551. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[37]	马均, 马文波, 明东风, 等. 重穗型水稻株型特征研究. 中国农业科学, 2006, 39: 679-685.
	Ma J, Ma W B, Ming D F,et al.Studies on the characteristics of rice plant with heavy panicle.Sci Agric Sin, 2006, 39: 679-685 (in Chinese with English abstract)

处理 Treatment	行株距 Row-plant spacing /cm	密度 Density /(×10⁴·hm^-2)	大穗型 Large panicle-typed variety		中穗型 Medium panicle-typed variety		小穗型 Small panicle-typed variety
处理 Treatment	行株距 Row-plant spacing /cm	密度 Density /(×10⁴·hm^-2)	穴苗数 Seedling number per hill	基本苗 Basic seedlings /(×10⁴·hm^-2)	穴苗数 Seedling number per hill	基本苗 Basic seedlings /(×10⁴·hm^-2)	穴苗数 Seedling number per hill	基本苗 Basic seedlings /(×10⁴·hm^-2)
A1	33×12	25.5	2	51.0	3	76.5	4	102.0
A2	33×14	21.0	2	42.0	3	63.0	4	84.0
A3	33×16	19.5	2	39.0	3	58.5	4	78.0
B1	30×10	33.0	2	66.0	3	99.0	4	132.0
B2	30×11.7	28.5	2	57.0	3	85.5	4	114.0
B3	30×13.3	25.5	2	51.0	3	76.5	4	102.0
B4	30×14.8	22.5	2	45.0	3	67.5	4	90.0
B5	30×16	21.0	2	42.0	3	63.0	4	84.0
C1	25×10	40.5	2	81.0	3	121.5	4	162.0
C2	25×11.7	34.5	2	69.0	3	103.5	4	138.0
C3	25×13.3	30.0	2	60.0	3	90.0	4	120.0
C4	25×14.8	27.0	2	54.0	3	81.0	4	108.0
C5	25×16	25.5	2	51.0	3	76.5	4	102.0

处理 Treatment	行株距 Row-plant spacing /cm	密度 Density /(×10⁴·hm^-2)	大穗型 Large panicle-typed variety		中穗型 Medium panicle-typed variety		小穗型 Small panicle-typed variety
处理 Treatment	行株距 Row-plant spacing /cm	密度 Density /(×10⁴·hm^-2)	穴苗数 Seedling number per hill	基本苗 Basic seedlings /(×10⁴·hm^-2)	穴苗数 Seedling number per hill	基本苗 Basic seedlings /(×10⁴·hm^-2)	穴苗数 Seedling number per hill	基本苗 Basic seedlings /(×10⁴·hm^-2)
A1	33×12	25.5	2	51.0	3	76.5	4	102.0
A2	33×14	21.0	2	42.0	3	63.0	4	84.0
A3	33×16	19.5	2	39.0	3	58.5	4	78.0
B1	30×10	33.0	2	66.0	3	99.0	4	132.0
B2	30×11.7	28.5	2	57.0	3	85.5	4	114.0
B3	30×13.3	25.5	2	51.0	3	76.5	4	102.0
B4	30×14.8	22.5	2	45.0	3	67.5	4	90.0
B5	30×16	21.0	2	42.0	3	63.0	4	84.0
C1	25×10	40.5	2	81.0	3	121.5	4	162.0
C2	25×11.7	34.5	2	69.0	3	103.5	4	138.0
C3	25×13.3	30.0	2	60.0	3	90.0	4	120.0
C4	25×14.8	27.0	2	54.0	3	81.0	4	108.0
C5	25×16	25.5	2	51.0	3	76.5	4	102.0

变异来源 Source	自由度 df	平方和 Sum of squares	均方 Mean square	F值 F value
年度Year (Y)	1	19.58	19.58	57.14^**
品种Cultivar (C)	5	260.25	52.05	159.01^**
处理Treatment (T)	12	69.11	5.76	190.47^**
年度×品种Y×C	5	1.64	0.33	21.83^*
年度×处理Y×T	12	0.36	0.03	2.02^ns
品种×处理C×T	60	58.92	0.98	65.49^**
年度×品种×处理Y×C×T	60	0.90	0.02	0.42^ns

变异来源 Source	自由度 df	平方和 Sum of squares	均方 Mean square	F值 F value
年度Year (Y)	1	19.58	19.58	57.14^**
品种Cultivar (C)	5	260.25	52.05	159.01^**
处理Treatment (T)	12	69.11	5.76	190.47^**
年度×品种Y×C	5	1.64	0.33	21.83^*
年度×处理Y×T	12	0.36	0.03	2.02^ns
品种×处理C×T	60	58.92	0.98	65.49^**
年度×品种×处理Y×C×T	60	0.90	0.02	0.42^ns

品种与处理 Cultivar and treatment	单位面积穗数 Panicle number /(×10⁴ hm^-2)	每穗粒数 Spikelet number per panicle	群体颖花量 Total spikelet number /(×10⁴ hm^-2)	结实率 Seed-setting rate /%	千粒重 1000-grain weight/g	理论产量 Theoretical yield /(t·hm^-2)	2013年实产 Harvested yield in 2013 /(t·hm^-2)	2014年实产 Harvested yield in 2014 /(t·hm^-2)
甬优2640 Yongyou 2640
A1	236.91 d	242.89 cd	57 541.86 b	92.77 a	25.23 a	13.47 b	13.10 b	12.35 ab
A2	222.60 ef	269.73 b	60 040.62 a	92.39 a	25.08 a	13.91 a	13.75 a	12.87 a
A3	210.50 g	282.55 a	59 475.82 ab	91.89 a	24.80 a	13.55 ab	13.25 ab	12.29 b
B1	254.10 bc	196.52 hi	49 935.73 fg	91.06 a	24.75 a	11.25 fg	10.97 ef	10.35 ef
B2	246.30 cd	208.00 fg	51 230.40 e	91.37 a	24.84 a	11.63 ef	11.27 e	10.42 ef
B3	239.40 d	221.40 e	53 002.05 cde	91.19 a	25.14 a	12.15 d	11.85 d	11.23 d
B4	228.75 e	239.36 d	54 754.43 c	91.49 a	25.28 a	12.66 c	12.45 c	11.91 c
B5	214.13 f	251.18 c	53 784.31 cd	90.53 a	25.13 a	12.23 cd	11.93 d	11.30 cd
C1	270.15 a	180.29 i	48 704.19 g	89.02 a	24.75 a	10.73 h	10.60 f	10.00 f
C2	262.68 ab	188.43 i	49 496.42 fg	89.73 a	24.88 a	11.05 gh	10.82 f	10.25 f
C3	250.22 bc	202.13 gh	50 574.71 ef	90.01 a	24.98 a	11.37 fg	11.15 ef	10.62 ef
C4	243.30 cd	212.89 ef	51 795.87 e	89.95 a	25.00 a	11.65 ef	11.45 de	10.92 de
C5	237.50 d	220.90 e	52 463.75 cde	90.93 a	24.93 a	11.89 de	11.68 d	11.18 d
甬优8号 Yongyou 8
A1	263.10 e	198.55 c	52 239.00 b	86.10 a	29.01 a	13.05 b	12.85 b	12.18 ab
A2	248.60 f	218.25 b	54 257.50 a	86.19 a	29.05 a	13.59 a	13.42 a	12.64 a
A3	225.94 g	232.31 a	52 487.02 b	86.02 a	28.95 a	13.07 b	12.81 b	12.00 bc
B1	293.70 bc	156.86 gh	46 068.94 ef	84.99 a	28.30 a	11.08 gh	10.70 fg	10.12 g
B2	279.20 de	168.60 ef	47 073.12 de	85.62 a	28.45 a	11.47 efg	11.14 ef	10.46 fg
B3	267.62 e	181.82 d	48 658.67 cd	85.54 a	29.05 a	12.09 cd	11.76 cd	11.23 de
B4	250.80 f	200.01 c	50 162.51 c	85.39 a	28.97 a	12.41 c	12.18 c	11.68 cd
B5	228.85 g	212.42 b	48 611.02 cd	85.31 a	28.83 a	11.95 cde	11.60 de	11.16 de
C1	310.06 a	144.83 i	44 905.63 f	84.62 a	28.05 a	10.66 h	10.51 g	10.11 g
C2	296.60 b	154.22 h	45 742.47 f	84.78 a	28.08 a	10.89 h	10.68 fg	10.23 fg
C3	283.70 cd	162.11 fg	45 990.92 ef	84.92 a	29.04 a	11.34 fg	11.10 ef	10.61 ef
C4	278.70 de	171.10 ef	47 685.57 de	84.85 a	28.83 a	11.66 ef	11.43 de	10.75 ef
C5	268.80 e	179.00 de	48 115.20 d	85.38 a	28.93 a	11.89 de	11.71 cd	11.12 de
均值Mean
A	234.61	240.71	56006.97	89.23	27.02	13.44	13.20	12.39
B	250.28	203.62	50328.12	88.25	26.87	11.89	11.58	10.99
C	270.17	181.59	48547.47	87.42	26.75	11.31	11.11	10.58