中国水稻科学 ›› 2016, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 313-322.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2016.5187
王士强1,2,3, 赵海红4, 萧长亮3, 赵黎明3, 顾春梅3, 那永光3, 解保胜3, 程式华1,2,*()
收稿日期:
2015-12-18
修回日期:
2016-04-04
出版日期:
2016-05-10
发布日期:
2016-05-10
通讯作者:
程式华
基金资助:
Shi-qiang WANG1,2,3, Hai-hong ZHAO4, Chang-liang XIAO3, Li-ming ZHAO3, Chun-mei GU3, Yong-guang NA3, Bao-sheng XIE3, Shi-hua CHENG1,2,*()
Received:
2015-12-18
Revised:
2016-04-04
Online:
2016-05-10
Published:
2016-05-10
Contact:
Shi-hua CHENG
摘要:
以黑龙江省30份主栽水稻品种或品系为试材,在孕穗期设置17℃冷水灌溉处理(20 d),以常规栽培管理为对照,分析冷水胁迫对水稻干物质生产的影响。结果表明,冷水胁迫导致所有试材每穴实粒数、结实率、千粒重和产量下降,并根据相对结实率将试材耐冷性分为1、3、5、7和9级,以7和9级最多,1级最少,分别占总材料的30%和10%。在冷水处理下,全部材料抽穗期至成熟期干物质积累量及比例、群体生长率、净同化率、粒叶比、收获指数、叶面积指数、剑叶叶基角、剑叶和倒2叶与倒3叶披垂度均下降,但高效叶面积率增加。相关分析表明,冷水处理的相对结实率与收获指数(r=0.96**)、产量 (r=0.91**)、粒叶比(r=0.84**)和干物质积累量(r=0.48**)的冷水反应指数(CRI)呈极显著正相关,与群体生长率(r=0.44*)、净同化率(r=0.44*)和干物质积累比例(r=0.43*)的CRI显著正相关。综上,孕穗期冷水胁迫对水稻干物质生产的影响在品种间存在很大差异,在冷水胁迫下耐冷性极强品种(系)干物质积累量及比例、群体生长率、净同化率、粒叶比和收获指数对冷水反应迟钝,这是耐冷性极强品种(系)保持较高产量的重要形态特征和生理原因。
中图分类号:
王士强, 赵海红, 萧长亮, 赵黎明, 顾春梅, 那永光, 解保胜, 程式华. 孕穗期冷水胁迫对寒地水稻干物质生产的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2016, 30(3): 313-322.
Shi-qiang WANG, Hai-hong ZHAO, Chang-liang XIAO, Li-ming ZHAO, Chun-mei GU, Yong-guang NA, Bao-sheng XIE, Shi-hua CHENG. Effects of Cold Stress During Booting Stage on Dry Matter Production of Rice in Cold Region[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2016, 30(3): 313-322.
耐冷性级别 Grade of tolerance to chilling | 品种(系) Variety (Line) | 相对结实率 Relative seed-setting rate/% | 生育期 Growth duration /d | 来源 Origin | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2013 | 2014 | ||||
极强HR | 龙粳25 Longjing 25 | 80.78 | 80.38 | 130 | 黑龙江省农业科学院HLJAAS |
空育131 Kongyu 131 | 81.84 | 82.02 | 127 | 黑龙江省农垦科学院HLJALRS | |
东农428 Dongnong 428 | 85.28 | 84.09 | 133 | 东北农业大学NAU | |
强R | 龙粳26 Longjing 26 | 79.41 | 79.92 | 126 | 黑龙江省农业科学院HLJAAS |
保糯1号 Baonuo 1 | 79.19 | 78.28 | 132~134 | 黑龙江省农垦科学院HLJALRS | |
龙稻8号 Longdao 8 | 78.06 | 69.83 | 135 | 黑龙江省农业科学院HLJAAS | |
垦稻10 Kendao 10 | 66.91 | 66.50 | 134~136 | 黑龙江省农垦科学院HLJALRS | |
东农427 Dongnong 427 | 79.41 | 76.90 | 135 | 东北农业大学NAU | |
中等M | 垦稻9号 Kendao 9 | 44.57 | 44.03 | 125 | 黑龙江省农垦科学院HLJALRS |
垦稻19 Kendao 19 | 41.47 | 41.06 | 125 | 黑龙江省农垦科学院HLJALRS | |
垦稻20 Kendao 20 | 46.26 | 41.25 | 127 | 黑龙江省农垦科学院HLJALRS | |
龙粳29 Longjing 29 | 48.28 | 47.48 | 127 | 黑龙江省农业科学院HLJAAS | |
龙粳20 Longjing 20 | 53.17 | 52.62 | 125~130 | 黑龙江省农业科学院HLJAAS | |
龙粳31 Longjing 31 | 56.17 | 55.20 | 130 | 黑龙江省农业科学院HLJAAS | |
垦稻25 Kendao 25 | 46.52 | 41.09 | 132 | 黑龙江省农垦科学院HLJALRS | |
龙粳37 Longjing 37 | 54.74 | 53.55 | 125 | 黑龙江省农业科学院HLJAAS | |
龙粳21 Longjing 21 | 53.48 | 49.89 | 126~132 | 黑龙江省农业科学院HLJAAS | |
弱S | 龙粳36 Longjing 36 | 27.98 | 26.83 | 130 | 黑龙江省农业科学院HLJAAS |
垦稻17 Kendao 17 | 28.17 | 24.70 | 127~129 | 黑龙江省农垦科学院HLJALRS | |
垦系017 Kenxi 017 | 28.28 | 27.89 | 133 | 黑龙江省农垦科学院HLJALRS | |
垦粳2号 Kenjing 2 | 33.63 | 33.69 | 133 | 黑龙江八一农垦大学HLJBYAU | |
垦稻12 Kendao 12 | 37.09 | 33.85 | 130~132 | 黑龙江省农垦科学院HLJALRS | |
垦稻23 Kendao 23 | 39.00 | 37.51 | 132 | 黑龙江省农垦科学院HLJALRS | |
垦粳5号 Kenjing 5 | 30.06 | 25.61 | 134 | 黑龙江八一农垦大学HLJBYAU | |
龙稻12 Longdao 12 | 36.01 | 34.46 | 134 | 黑龙江省农业科学院HLJAAS | |
龙粳27 Longjing 27 | 33.11 | 31.98 | 127 | 黑龙江省农业科学院HLJAAS | |
极弱HS | 垦稻26 Kendao 26 | 19.65 | 18.04 | 126 | 黑龙江省农垦科学院HLJALRS |
垦糯1号 Kennuo 1 | 14.46 | 14.18 | 132~134 | 黑龙江省农垦科学院HLJALRS | |
龙稻10 Longdao 10 | 12.11 | 11.44 | 135 | 黑龙江省农业科学院HLJAAS | |
垦鉴稻6号 Kenjiandao 6 | 8.27 | 7.98 | 127~129 | 黑龙江省农垦科学院HLJALRS |
表1 供试水稻品种(系)耐冷性分级
Table 1 Grade of tolerance to chilling of rice cultivars used in this study.
耐冷性级别 Grade of tolerance to chilling | 品种(系) Variety (Line) | 相对结实率 Relative seed-setting rate/% | 生育期 Growth duration /d | 来源 Origin | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2013 | 2014 | ||||
极强HR | 龙粳25 Longjing 25 | 80.78 | 80.38 | 130 | 黑龙江省农业科学院HLJAAS |
空育131 Kongyu 131 | 81.84 | 82.02 | 127 | 黑龙江省农垦科学院HLJALRS | |
东农428 Dongnong 428 | 85.28 | 84.09 | 133 | 东北农业大学NAU | |
强R | 龙粳26 Longjing 26 | 79.41 | 79.92 | 126 | 黑龙江省农业科学院HLJAAS |
保糯1号 Baonuo 1 | 79.19 | 78.28 | 132~134 | 黑龙江省农垦科学院HLJALRS | |
龙稻8号 Longdao 8 | 78.06 | 69.83 | 135 | 黑龙江省农业科学院HLJAAS | |
垦稻10 Kendao 10 | 66.91 | 66.50 | 134~136 | 黑龙江省农垦科学院HLJALRS | |
东农427 Dongnong 427 | 79.41 | 76.90 | 135 | 东北农业大学NAU | |
中等M | 垦稻9号 Kendao 9 | 44.57 | 44.03 | 125 | 黑龙江省农垦科学院HLJALRS |
垦稻19 Kendao 19 | 41.47 | 41.06 | 125 | 黑龙江省农垦科学院HLJALRS | |
垦稻20 Kendao 20 | 46.26 | 41.25 | 127 | 黑龙江省农垦科学院HLJALRS | |
龙粳29 Longjing 29 | 48.28 | 47.48 | 127 | 黑龙江省农业科学院HLJAAS | |
龙粳20 Longjing 20 | 53.17 | 52.62 | 125~130 | 黑龙江省农业科学院HLJAAS | |
龙粳31 Longjing 31 | 56.17 | 55.20 | 130 | 黑龙江省农业科学院HLJAAS | |
垦稻25 Kendao 25 | 46.52 | 41.09 | 132 | 黑龙江省农垦科学院HLJALRS | |
龙粳37 Longjing 37 | 54.74 | 53.55 | 125 | 黑龙江省农业科学院HLJAAS | |
龙粳21 Longjing 21 | 53.48 | 49.89 | 126~132 | 黑龙江省农业科学院HLJAAS | |
弱S | 龙粳36 Longjing 36 | 27.98 | 26.83 | 130 | 黑龙江省农业科学院HLJAAS |
垦稻17 Kendao 17 | 28.17 | 24.70 | 127~129 | 黑龙江省农垦科学院HLJALRS | |
垦系017 Kenxi 017 | 28.28 | 27.89 | 133 | 黑龙江省农垦科学院HLJALRS | |
垦粳2号 Kenjing 2 | 33.63 | 33.69 | 133 | 黑龙江八一农垦大学HLJBYAU | |
垦稻12 Kendao 12 | 37.09 | 33.85 | 130~132 | 黑龙江省农垦科学院HLJALRS | |
垦稻23 Kendao 23 | 39.00 | 37.51 | 132 | 黑龙江省农垦科学院HLJALRS | |
垦粳5号 Kenjing 5 | 30.06 | 25.61 | 134 | 黑龙江八一农垦大学HLJBYAU | |
龙稻12 Longdao 12 | 36.01 | 34.46 | 134 | 黑龙江省农业科学院HLJAAS | |
龙粳27 Longjing 27 | 33.11 | 31.98 | 127 | 黑龙江省农业科学院HLJAAS | |
极弱HS | 垦稻26 Kendao 26 | 19.65 | 18.04 | 126 | 黑龙江省农垦科学院HLJALRS |
垦糯1号 Kennuo 1 | 14.46 | 14.18 | 132~134 | 黑龙江省农垦科学院HLJALRS | |
龙稻10 Longdao 10 | 12.11 | 11.44 | 135 | 黑龙江省农业科学院HLJAAS | |
垦鉴稻6号 Kenjiandao 6 | 8.27 | 7.98 | 127~129 | 黑龙江省农垦科学院HLJALRS |
图1 黑龙江佳木斯7月1日至8月4日的气温变化(2013和2014年)
Fig.1. Changes in air temperature from July 1 to August 4 in Jiamusi, Heilongjiang Province (2013 and 2014). DAT2013, Day average temperature in 2013; DAT2014, Day average temperature in 2014; NAT2013, Night average temperature in 2013; NAT2014, Night average temperature in 2014.
耐冷性级别 Grade of tolerance to chilling | 处理 Treatment | 每穴实粒数 FGNH | 千粒重 1000-GW /g | 结实率 SSR /% | 每穴产量 YPH /g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HR | LT | 849.28±62.27 b | 23.91±1.63 a | 76.62±0.79 bB | 21.42±1.61 bB |
CK | 1160.00±95.45 a | 26.11±1.13 a | 93.26±0.48 aA | 32.30±1.74 aA | |
CRI/% | 73.32 | 91.56 | 82.16 | 66.18 | |
R | LT | 684.97±66.49 bB | 24.49±0.73 b | 69.30±2.78 bB | 17.55±1.77 bB |
CK | 1273.63±61.41 aA | 27.02±0.40 a | 93.23±0.83 aA | 35.08±1.46 aA | |
CRI/% | 54.57 | 90.60 | 74.29 | 50.48 | |
M | LT | 499.96±27.28 bB | 23.74±0.43 bB | 43.65±1.75 bB | 12.46±0.69 bB |
CK | 1171.65±44.69 aA | 27.42±0.56 aA | 92.22±0.83 aA | 32.46±1.28 aA | |
CRI/% | 42.67 | 86.69 | 47.35 | 38.41 | |
S | LT | 283.23±32.77 bB | 22.27±0.59 bB | 28.05±1.59 bB | 6.58±0.71 bB |
CK | 1192.61±74.08 aA | 27.15±0.45 aA | 91.07±1.12 aA | 32.77±1.60 aA | |
CRI/% | 23.92 | 81.96 | 30.73 | 20.27 | |
HS | LT | 181.42±64.69 bB | 21.59±0.66 bB | 11.46±1.76 bB | 3.89±1.40 bB |
CK | 1325.42±78.55 aA | 26.37±0.53 aA | 89.37±1.50 aA | 35.46±1.76 aA | |
CRI/% | 12.99 | 81.87 | 12.91 | 10.48 |
表2 冷水灌溉处理与正常水温灌溉处理水稻产量及其构成因素比较
Table 2 Comparison of grain yield and its components of rice under cold water irrigation and normal water temperature treatment.
耐冷性级别 Grade of tolerance to chilling | 处理 Treatment | 每穴实粒数 FGNH | 千粒重 1000-GW /g | 结实率 SSR /% | 每穴产量 YPH /g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HR | LT | 849.28±62.27 b | 23.91±1.63 a | 76.62±0.79 bB | 21.42±1.61 bB |
CK | 1160.00±95.45 a | 26.11±1.13 a | 93.26±0.48 aA | 32.30±1.74 aA | |
CRI/% | 73.32 | 91.56 | 82.16 | 66.18 | |
R | LT | 684.97±66.49 bB | 24.49±0.73 b | 69.30±2.78 bB | 17.55±1.77 bB |
CK | 1273.63±61.41 aA | 27.02±0.40 a | 93.23±0.83 aA | 35.08±1.46 aA | |
CRI/% | 54.57 | 90.60 | 74.29 | 50.48 | |
M | LT | 499.96±27.28 bB | 23.74±0.43 bB | 43.65±1.75 bB | 12.46±0.69 bB |
CK | 1171.65±44.69 aA | 27.42±0.56 aA | 92.22±0.83 aA | 32.46±1.28 aA | |
CRI/% | 42.67 | 86.69 | 47.35 | 38.41 | |
S | LT | 283.23±32.77 bB | 22.27±0.59 bB | 28.05±1.59 bB | 6.58±0.71 bB |
CK | 1192.61±74.08 aA | 27.15±0.45 aA | 91.07±1.12 aA | 32.77±1.60 aA | |
CRI/% | 23.92 | 81.96 | 30.73 | 20.27 | |
HS | LT | 181.42±64.69 bB | 21.59±0.66 bB | 11.46±1.76 bB | 3.89±1.40 bB |
CK | 1325.42±78.55 aA | 26.37±0.53 aA | 89.37±1.50 aA | 35.46±1.76 aA | |
CRI/% | 12.99 | 81.87 | 12.91 | 10.48 |
耐冷性级别 Grade of tolerance to chilling | 处理 Treatment | 上3叶叶面积指数 LAITTL | 全叶叶面积指数 LAIAL | 高效叶面积率 RLATTL/% | 粒叶比 GLR/(grain·cm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HR | LT | 3.37±0.11 a | 3.74±0.25 b | 91.13±3.33 a | 0.58±0.05 a |
CK | 3.59±0.08 a | 4.44±0.28 a | 82.07±7.18 a | 0.72±0.05 a | |
CRI/% | 93.94 | 84.18 | 112.19 | 81.17 | |
R | LT | 3.44±0.23 a | 3.75±0.15 a | 90.89±3.20 a | 0.50±0.05 b |
CK | 3.50±0.11 a | 4.77±0.32 a | 75.49±5.73 b | 0.76±0.09 a | |
CRI/% | 99.39 | 80.37 | 122.19 | 68.68 | |
M | LT | 3.33±0.07 a | 3.68±0.10 b | 91.06±1.70 aA | 0.38±0.03 bB |
CK | 3.40±0.17 a | 4.22±0.23 a | 81.39±2.11 bB | 0.80±0.05 aA | |
CRI/% | 99.56 | 88.63 | 112.16 | 49.12 | |
S | LT | 3.37±0.06 a | 3.75±0.07 bB | 91.14±1.15 aA | 0.21±0.03 bB |
CK | 3.48±0.12 a | 4.36±0.16 aA | 79.90±1.20 bB | 0.77±0.04 aA | |
CRI/% | 97.59 | 86.62 | 114.21 | 27.47 | |
HS | LT | 3.41±0.17 a | 3.83±0.18 a | 89.48±0.90 a | 0.12±0.04 bB |
CK | 3.71±0.32 a | 4.67±0.47 a | 81.87±3.99 a | 0.83±0.07 aA | |
CRI/% | 93.51 | 84.01 | 110 | 14.94 |
表3 冷水灌溉处理与正常水温灌溉处理水稻粒叶比、叶面积指数和叶面积率的比较
Table 3 Difference in grain-leaf ratio, leaf area index and ratio of leaf area under cold water irrigation and normal water temperature treatment.
耐冷性级别 Grade of tolerance to chilling | 处理 Treatment | 上3叶叶面积指数 LAITTL | 全叶叶面积指数 LAIAL | 高效叶面积率 RLATTL/% | 粒叶比 GLR/(grain·cm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HR | LT | 3.37±0.11 a | 3.74±0.25 b | 91.13±3.33 a | 0.58±0.05 a |
CK | 3.59±0.08 a | 4.44±0.28 a | 82.07±7.18 a | 0.72±0.05 a | |
CRI/% | 93.94 | 84.18 | 112.19 | 81.17 | |
R | LT | 3.44±0.23 a | 3.75±0.15 a | 90.89±3.20 a | 0.50±0.05 b |
CK | 3.50±0.11 a | 4.77±0.32 a | 75.49±5.73 b | 0.76±0.09 a | |
CRI/% | 99.39 | 80.37 | 122.19 | 68.68 | |
M | LT | 3.33±0.07 a | 3.68±0.10 b | 91.06±1.70 aA | 0.38±0.03 bB |
CK | 3.40±0.17 a | 4.22±0.23 a | 81.39±2.11 bB | 0.80±0.05 aA | |
CRI/% | 99.56 | 88.63 | 112.16 | 49.12 | |
S | LT | 3.37±0.06 a | 3.75±0.07 bB | 91.14±1.15 aA | 0.21±0.03 bB |
CK | 3.48±0.12 a | 4.36±0.16 aA | 79.90±1.20 bB | 0.77±0.04 aA | |
CRI/% | 97.59 | 86.62 | 114.21 | 27.47 | |
HS | LT | 3.41±0.17 a | 3.83±0.18 a | 89.48±0.90 a | 0.12±0.04 bB |
CK | 3.71±0.32 a | 4.67±0.47 a | 81.87±3.99 a | 0.83±0.07 aA | |
CRI/% | 93.51 | 84.01 | 110 | 14.94 |
性状 Trait | 处理 Treatment | HR | R | M | S | HS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
剑叶叶基角 D1LBA/° | LT | 34.58±7.98 a | 31.25±6.55 a | 29.31±5.19 a | 29.22±3.13 a | 18.81±7.33 a |
CK | 36.75±7.88 a | 32.55±2.34 a | 33.22±4.62 a | 34.33±4.81 a | 19.81±4.84 a | |
CRI/% | 94.10 | 96.01 | 88.23 | 85.12 | 94.95 | |
倒2叶叶基角D2LBA/° | LT | 26.75±1.28 a | 21.20±1.91 a | 18.47±1.70 a | 20.53±1.83 b | 17.38±3.23 a |
CK | 21.08±0.74 b | 20.50±3.42 a | 18.72±1.08 a | 24.36±2.07 a | 16.94±1.35 a | |
CRI/% | 126.90 | 103.41 | 98.66 | 84.28 | 102.60 | |
倒3叶叶基角D3LBA/° | LT | 27.64±2.36 a | 27.60±1.66 a | 24.25±1.70 a | 25.42±1.71 a | 22.25±4.36 a |
CK | 28.17±1.60 a | 25.70±2.05 a | 25.03±1.39 a | 28.58±1.62 a | 25.50±1.49 a | |
CRI/% | 98.12 | 107.39 | 96.88 | 88.94 | 87.25 | |
剑叶披垂度D1DA/° | LT | 16.67±7.48 a | 10.95±4.89 a | 10.25±2.97 a | 11.00±2.23 a | 6.40±1.85 a |
CK | 26.17±9.34 a | 18.45±3.41 a | 12.25±2.91 a | 13.75±2.49 a | 14.30±3.58 a | |
CRI/% | 63.70 | 59.35 | 83.67 | 80.00 | 44.76 | |
倒2叶披垂度D2DA/° | LT | 13.33±1.34 a | 9.20±2.00 a | 10.61±1.64 a | 9.14±1.28 b | 6.50±2.46 a |
CK | 17.92±5.68 a | 14.80±3.23 a | 16.97±3.73 a | 18.67±3.48 a | 12.44±3.14 a | |
CRI/% | 74.39 | 62.16 | 62.52 | 48.96 | 52.25 | |
倒3叶披垂度D3DA/° | LT | 16.28±3.64 a | 14.95±4.00 a | 13.36±1.43 a | 12.06±2.46 a | 8.63±1.55 b |
CK | 16.50±0.88 a | 15.90±2.60 a | 18.69±3.47 a | 22.78±4.27 a | 18.38±1.22 a | |
CRI/% | 98.67 | 94.03 | 71.48 | 52.94 | 46.95 |
表4 冷水灌溉处理与正常水温灌溉处理水稻上3叶受光姿态比较
Table 4 Comparison of basic angle, drooping angle of top three leaves in rice under cold water irrigation and normal water temperature treatment.
性状 Trait | 处理 Treatment | HR | R | M | S | HS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
剑叶叶基角 D1LBA/° | LT | 34.58±7.98 a | 31.25±6.55 a | 29.31±5.19 a | 29.22±3.13 a | 18.81±7.33 a |
CK | 36.75±7.88 a | 32.55±2.34 a | 33.22±4.62 a | 34.33±4.81 a | 19.81±4.84 a | |
CRI/% | 94.10 | 96.01 | 88.23 | 85.12 | 94.95 | |
倒2叶叶基角D2LBA/° | LT | 26.75±1.28 a | 21.20±1.91 a | 18.47±1.70 a | 20.53±1.83 b | 17.38±3.23 a |
CK | 21.08±0.74 b | 20.50±3.42 a | 18.72±1.08 a | 24.36±2.07 a | 16.94±1.35 a | |
CRI/% | 126.90 | 103.41 | 98.66 | 84.28 | 102.60 | |
倒3叶叶基角D3LBA/° | LT | 27.64±2.36 a | 27.60±1.66 a | 24.25±1.70 a | 25.42±1.71 a | 22.25±4.36 a |
CK | 28.17±1.60 a | 25.70±2.05 a | 25.03±1.39 a | 28.58±1.62 a | 25.50±1.49 a | |
CRI/% | 98.12 | 107.39 | 96.88 | 88.94 | 87.25 | |
剑叶披垂度D1DA/° | LT | 16.67±7.48 a | 10.95±4.89 a | 10.25±2.97 a | 11.00±2.23 a | 6.40±1.85 a |
CK | 26.17±9.34 a | 18.45±3.41 a | 12.25±2.91 a | 13.75±2.49 a | 14.30±3.58 a | |
CRI/% | 63.70 | 59.35 | 83.67 | 80.00 | 44.76 | |
倒2叶披垂度D2DA/° | LT | 13.33±1.34 a | 9.20±2.00 a | 10.61±1.64 a | 9.14±1.28 b | 6.50±2.46 a |
CK | 17.92±5.68 a | 14.80±3.23 a | 16.97±3.73 a | 18.67±3.48 a | 12.44±3.14 a | |
CRI/% | 74.39 | 62.16 | 62.52 | 48.96 | 52.25 | |
倒3叶披垂度D3DA/° | LT | 16.28±3.64 a | 14.95±4.00 a | 13.36±1.43 a | 12.06±2.46 a | 8.63±1.55 b |
CK | 16.50±0.88 a | 15.90±2.60 a | 18.69±3.47 a | 22.78±4.27 a | 18.38±1.22 a | |
CRI/% | 98.67 | 94.03 | 71.48 | 52.94 | 46.95 |
性状与处理 Trait and treatment | HR | R | M | S | HS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
干物质积累量DAR/(g·m-2) | |||||
LT | 409.97±41.27 a | 307.44±61.55 b | 279.98±20.05 bB | 257.43±28.09 bB | 255.24±67.34 bB |
CK | 526.81±58.19 a | 530.65±38.06 a | 586.89±49.23 aA | 573.56±49.77 aA | 658.28±49.28 aA |
CRI/% | 80.09 | 59.03 | 49.43 | 47.65 | 38.40 |
干物质积累比例DMAR/% | |||||
LT | 29.94±4.32 a | 24.49±4.77 b | 21.96±1.52 bB | 19.57±2.13 bB | 19.33±4.50 b |
CK | 36.01±4.69 a | 34.92±3.82 a | 38.30±2.39 aA | 36.19±2.55 aA | 38.40±0.85 a |
CRI/% | 84.90 | 70.12 | 58.13 | 55.91 | 50.36 |
群体生长率CGR/(g·m-2d-1) | |||||
LT | 7.92±0.42 a | 6.54±0.99 a | 5.76±0.44 bB | 5.25±0.60 bB | 5.26±1.42 b |
CK | 9.72±0.85 a | 11.17±1.35 a | 10.58±0.81 aA | 10.50±0.85 aA | 12.49±1.21 a |
CRI/% | 83.41 | 63.30 | 56.01 | 52.92 | 41.96 |
净同化率NAR/(g·m-2d-1) | |||||
LT | 2.95±0.17 a | 2.40±0.34 a | 2.19±0.17 bB | 1.95±0.23 bB | 1.94±0.56 b |
CK | 3.35±0.19 a | 3.44±0.30 a | 3.57±0.25 aA | 3.42±0.29 aA | 3.77±0.34 a |
CRI/% | 88.71 | 71.97 | 63.06 | 59.37 | 49.38 |
叶面积衰减率DRLA/(d-1) | |||||
LT | 0.037±0.01 a | 0.042±0.00 a | 0.038±0.00 a | 0.038±0.00 a | 0.039±0.00 a |
CK | 0.050±0.01 a | 0.056±0.01 a | 0.041±0.01 a | 0.042±0.00 a | 0.044±0.01 a |
CRI/% | 75.34 | 78.44 | 98.68 | 93.90 | 91.05 |
收获指数HI | |||||
LT | 0.48±3.17 a | 0.44±2.75 bB | 0.35±1.20 bB | 0.25±1.25 bB | 0.18±1.03 bB |
CK | 0.55±1.39 a | 0.55±1.18 aA | 0.58±1.88 aA | 0.55±1.32 aA | 0.58±0.92 aA |
CRI/% | 86.54 | 79.72 | 60.46 | 46.18 | 31.70 |
表5 冷水灌溉处理与正常水温灌溉处理水稻抽穗后干物质生产的差异
Table 5 Difference in dry matter production in rice after heading under cold water irrigation and normal water temperature treatment.
性状与处理 Trait and treatment | HR | R | M | S | HS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
干物质积累量DAR/(g·m-2) | |||||
LT | 409.97±41.27 a | 307.44±61.55 b | 279.98±20.05 bB | 257.43±28.09 bB | 255.24±67.34 bB |
CK | 526.81±58.19 a | 530.65±38.06 a | 586.89±49.23 aA | 573.56±49.77 aA | 658.28±49.28 aA |
CRI/% | 80.09 | 59.03 | 49.43 | 47.65 | 38.40 |
干物质积累比例DMAR/% | |||||
LT | 29.94±4.32 a | 24.49±4.77 b | 21.96±1.52 bB | 19.57±2.13 bB | 19.33±4.50 b |
CK | 36.01±4.69 a | 34.92±3.82 a | 38.30±2.39 aA | 36.19±2.55 aA | 38.40±0.85 a |
CRI/% | 84.90 | 70.12 | 58.13 | 55.91 | 50.36 |
群体生长率CGR/(g·m-2d-1) | |||||
LT | 7.92±0.42 a | 6.54±0.99 a | 5.76±0.44 bB | 5.25±0.60 bB | 5.26±1.42 b |
CK | 9.72±0.85 a | 11.17±1.35 a | 10.58±0.81 aA | 10.50±0.85 aA | 12.49±1.21 a |
CRI/% | 83.41 | 63.30 | 56.01 | 52.92 | 41.96 |
净同化率NAR/(g·m-2d-1) | |||||
LT | 2.95±0.17 a | 2.40±0.34 a | 2.19±0.17 bB | 1.95±0.23 bB | 1.94±0.56 b |
CK | 3.35±0.19 a | 3.44±0.30 a | 3.57±0.25 aA | 3.42±0.29 aA | 3.77±0.34 a |
CRI/% | 88.71 | 71.97 | 63.06 | 59.37 | 49.38 |
叶面积衰减率DRLA/(d-1) | |||||
LT | 0.037±0.01 a | 0.042±0.00 a | 0.038±0.00 a | 0.038±0.00 a | 0.039±0.00 a |
CK | 0.050±0.01 a | 0.056±0.01 a | 0.041±0.01 a | 0.042±0.00 a | 0.044±0.01 a |
CRI/% | 75.34 | 78.44 | 98.68 | 93.90 | 91.05 |
收获指数HI | |||||
LT | 0.48±3.17 a | 0.44±2.75 bB | 0.35±1.20 bB | 0.25±1.25 bB | 0.18±1.03 bB |
CK | 0.55±1.39 a | 0.55±1.18 aA | 0.58±1.88 aA | 0.55±1.32 aA | 0.58±0.92 aA |
CRI/% | 86.54 | 79.72 | 60.46 | 46.18 | 31.70 |
图2 冷水灌溉处理与正常水温灌溉处理水稻的茎鞘物质输出率和茎鞘物质转化率 ERMSS-茎鞘物质输出率; TRMSS-茎鞘物质转化率。下同。
Fig. 2. Difference in export rate and translocation rate of dry matter in stem-sheath under cold water irrigation and normal water temperature treatment. ERMSS, Export rate of dry matter in stem-sheath; TRMSS, Translocation rate of dry matter in stem-sheath. The same as below.
指标 Index | YPH | D1LBA | D2LBA | D3LBA | D1DA | D2DA | D3DA | LAITTL | LAIAL | RLATTL |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSR | 0.91** | 0.08 | 0.28 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.20 | 0.29 | 0.02 | -0.10 | 0.20 |
指标 Index | GLR | ERMSS | TRMSS | DAR | DMAR | CGR | NAR | DRLA | HI | |
RSR | 0.84** | 0.03 | 0.25 | 0.48** | 0.43* | 0.44* | 0.44* | -0.32 | 0.96** |
表6 孕穗期冷水胁迫下相对结实率与产量、冠层结构和物质生产特性CRI的关系
Table 6 Correlation coefficients between relative seed setting rate(RSR) and cold water response indices of rice grain yield, canopy structure and dry matter production at booting stage under cold water irrigation.
指标 Index | YPH | D1LBA | D2LBA | D3LBA | D1DA | D2DA | D3DA | LAITTL | LAIAL | RLATTL |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSR | 0.91** | 0.08 | 0.28 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.20 | 0.29 | 0.02 | -0.10 | 0.20 |
指标 Index | GLR | ERMSS | TRMSS | DAR | DMAR | CGR | NAR | DRLA | HI | |
RSR | 0.84** | 0.03 | 0.25 | 0.48** | 0.43* | 0.44* | 0.44* | -0.32 | 0.96** |
[1] | 赵秀琴, 张婷, 王文生, 等. 水稻低温胁迫不同时间的代谢物谱图分析. 作物学报, 2013, 39(4): 720-726. |
Zhao X Q, Zhang T, Wang W S, et al.Time-course metabolic profiling in rice under low temperature treatment.Acta Agron Sin, 2013, 39(4): 720-726.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 程式华,李建.现代中国水稻.北京:金盾出版社,2007:94-96. |
Cheng S H, Li J. Modern Chinese Rice.Beijing:Golden Shield Press, 2007, 94-96.(in Chinese) | |
[3] | Zhang Y P, Xiang J, Chen H Z, et al.Physiological characterization of green turning of rice seedlings at different temperatures.Agric Sci&Technol, 2015,16(7):1390-1394,1513. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[4] | 王艳春,王士强,赵海红.寒地水稻冷害减产原因与生理机制的研究进展.现代化农业,2009(9):7-8. |
Wang Y C, Wang S Q, Zhao H H.Progress in research on the reason of yield reduce and the physiological mechanism of cold injury of rice in cold regions.Mod Agric, 2009,(9):7-8. (in Chinese) | |
[5] | 张荣萍, 马均, 蔡光泽, 等.开花期低温胁迫对四川攀西稻区水稻开花结实的影响. 作物学报, 2012, 38(9):1734-1742. |
Zhang R P, Ma Y, Cai G Z, et al.Effects of low temperature stress during flowering stage on flowering and seed setting of rice in Panxi Region, Sichuan Province.Acta Agron Sin, 2012, 38(9):1734-1742. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 李健陵, 霍治国, 吴丽姬, 等. 孕穗期低温对水稻产量的影响及其生理机制. 中国水稻科学, 2014, 28(3): 277-288. |
Li J L, Huo Z G, Wu L J, et al.Effects of low temperature on grain yield of rice and its physiological mechanism at the booting stage.Chin J Rice Sci, 2014, 28(3): 277-288. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 李广旭, 陈华民, 吴茂森, 等. OsBTF3过量表达和RNAi转基因水稻抗盐和抗低温胁迫鉴定. 中国水稻科学, 2012, 26(1): 5-8. |
Li G X, Chen H M, Wu R S.et al.Resistance to high salt and cold stress of transgenic rice seedings with over-expressed and RNAi-silenced OsBTF3.Chin J Rice Sci, 2012, 26(1):5-8.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 周玲艳,姜大刚,李静,等.逆境处理下水稻叶角质层蜡质积累及其与蜡质合成相关基因OsGL1表达的关系.作物学报,2012,38(6):1115-1120. |
Zhou L Y, Jiang D G, Li J, et al.Effect of stresses on leaf cuticular wax accumulation and its relationship to expression of OsGL1-Homologous genes in rice.Acta Agron Sin, 2012, 38(6):1115-1120. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 谢勇武,杨树明,曾亚文,等.粳稻02428×02428c重组自交系孕穗期耐冷性QTL分析.中国水稻科学,2011,25(6):681-684. |
Xie Y W, Yang S M, Zheng Y W, et al.QTL analysis of cold tolerance in japonica rice using reconbinant inbred lines from 02428×02428c at booting stage.Chin J Rice Sci,2011, 25(6): 681-684. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 张金恩,李迎春,陆魁东,等.温度胁迫对早稻分蘖期生长和分蘖能力影响研究.第32届中国气象学会年会S15提升气象为农服务能力,保障农业提质增效.北京: 中国气象学会, 2015. |
Zhang J N, Lin Y C, Lu K D, et al.Effect of temperature stress on growth and tillering ability of super hybrid early race at tillering stage. The 32nd Session of the Chinese Meteorological Society Annual Meeting S15 Improving the Capacity of Meteorological Service for the Agriculture, to Ensure Agricultural Quality Efficiency. Beijing: China Meteorological Society, 2015. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 周新桥,陈达刚,李丽君,等.秧苗期低温胁迫对华南主推双季水稻生长的影响.西南农业学报,2013,26(3):936-941. |
Zhou X Q, Chen D G, Li L J, et al.Effects of chilling stress on growth of double cropping rice in south China at seeding stage.Southwest China J Agric Sci, 2013,26(3):936-941.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 贾琰,沈阳,邹德堂,等.孕穗期冷水灌溉对寒地粳稻籽粒灌浆及其氮素积累的影响.中国水稻科学,2015,29(3):259-272. |
Jia Y, Shen Y, Zou D T, et al.Effect of cold-water irrigation at booting stage on grain filling an nitrogen accumulation of rice in cold-region.Chin J Rice Sci, 2015, 29(3):259-272. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 邹德堂,刘化龙.寒地水稻耐冷性研究.北京:气象出版社,2013:22-23 |
Zou D T, Liu H L.Studies on rice cold tolerant and sensitive lines to low temperaturestress in cold area of northeastern China. Beijing: China Meteorological Press,2013: 22-23.(in Chinese) | |
[14] | 赵黎明,李明,郑殿峰,等.灌溉方式与种植密度对寒地水稻产量及光合物质生产特性的影响. 农业工程学报,2015,6(31):159-169. |
Zhao L M, Li M, Zheng D F, et al.Effects of irrigation methods and rice planting densities on yield and photosynthetic characteristics of matter production in cold area.Tran Chin Soci Agric Engin, 2015, 6(31):159-169. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 陈金,田云录,董文军,等.东北水稻生长发育和产量对夜间升温的响应.中国水稻科学,2013,27(1):84-90. |
Chen J, Tian Y L, Dong W J, et al.Responses of rice growth and grain yeild to nighttime warming in northeast China.Chin J Rice Sci, 2013, 27(1): 84-90. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 杨晓光,李茂松,霍治国.农业气象灾害及其减灾技术.北京:化学工业出版社,2010:43 |
Yang X G, Li M S, Huo Z G.Agrometeorological Disaster and Disaster Reduction Technology. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2010: 43. (in Chinese) | |
[17] | 李健陵,霍治国,吴丽姬,等.孕穗期低温对水稻产量的影响及其生理机制.中国水稻科学,2014,28(3):277-288. |
Li J L, Huo Z G, Wu L J, et al.Effects of low temperature on grain yield of rice and its physiological mechanism at the booting stage.Chin J Rice Sci, 2014, 28(3): 277-288.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 孙擎,杨再强,高丽娜,等.低温对早稻幼穗分化期叶片生理特性的影响及其与产量的关系.中国生态农业学报,2014,22(11):1326-1333. |
Sun Q, Yang Z Q, Gao L N, et al.Effect of low temperature stress on physiological characteristics of flag leaf and its relationship with grain yield during panicle primordium differentiation stage of early rice.Chin J Eco-Agric, 2014, 22(11):1326-1333. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 刘涛,赵娟,孙婷,等.低温胁迫下水稻传统品种与现代品种不同的响应机制.分子植物育种,2015,13(2):269-275. |
Liu T, Zhao J, Sun T, et al.The different response mechanisms of traditional and modern rice varieties under low temperature.Mol Plant Breeding, 2015, 13(2):269-275. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 孙磊,陈国祥,吕川根,等.壳聚糖对低温处理下水稻剑叶光合特性的影响.南京师大学报:自然科学版,2010,33(4):75-79. |
Sun L, Chen G X, Lü C G, et al.Effects of chitosan on photosyn thetic characteristics of flag leaf in rice under low temperature. J Nanjing Nor Univ:Nat Sci Ed), 2010, 33(4):75-79. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 苗微,王国骄,马殿荣,等.辽宁省杂草稻幼苗对低温胁迫的生理响应.中国水稻科学,2011,25(6):639-644. |
Miao W, Wang G J, Ma D R, et al.Physiological responses of weedy rice to cold stress at seedling stage in Liaoning Province, China.Chin J Rice Sci, 2011, 25(6):639-644.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 张金恩,聂秋生,李迎春,等.颖花分化期低温处理对早稻叶片光合能力和产量的影响.中国农业气象,2014,35(4):410-416. |
Zhang J E, Nie Q S, Li Y C, et al.Effects of low temperature stress on the photosynthetic capacity and yield components of early rice at the spikelet differentiation stage.Chin J Agrom, 2014, 35(4):410-416.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 苗芳, 张嵩午, 王长发, 等. 低温小麦种质叶片结构及某些生理特性. 应用生态学报,2006,17(3):408-412. |
Miao F, Zhang S W, Wang C F, et al.Leaf structure and some physiologic characteristics of low temperature wheat germplasm.Chin J Appl Ecol, 2006,17(3):408-412.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 王树刚, 王振林, 王平, 等. 不同小麦品种对低温胁迫的反应及抗冻性评价. 生态学报, 2011, 31(4): 1064-1072. |
Wang S G, Wang Z L, Wang P, et al.Evaluation of wheat freezing resistance based on the responses of the physiological indices to low temperature stress.Acta Ecol Sin. 2011, 31(4):1064-1072.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 徐海成, 尹燕枰, 蔡铁, 等. 冬小麦拔节期不同茎蘖对低温胁迫的反应及抗冻性评价. 应用生态学报,2013,24(8):2197-2204. |
Xu H C, Yin Y P, Cai T, et al.Responses of winter wheat tillers at different positions to low temperature stress at stem elongation stage and their freezing resistance evaluation.Chin J Appl Ecol, 2013,24(8):2197-2204.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | 刘凤艳. 寒地早粳稻耐冷害农艺性状调查.农业灾害研究,2013,3(6):24-28. |
Liu F Y.Investigation on cold tolerance agronomic traits of early japonica rice in cold region.J Agric Catastrophol, 2013, 3(6):24-28. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | 赵国珍,Yang S J,Yea J D,等.冷水胁迫对云南粳稻育成品种农艺性状的影响.云南农业大学学报,2010,25(2):158-165. |
Zhao G Z, Yang S J, Yea J D, et al.Effect of cold water irrigation on agronomic traits of improved japonica rice cultivars from Yunnan Province, China.J Yunnan Agric Univ, 2010, 25(2):158-165. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 郭展, 张运波. 水稻对干旱胁迫的生理生化响应及分子调控研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 335-349. |
[2] | 韦还和, 马唯一, 左博源, 汪璐璐, 朱旺, 耿孝宇, 张翔, 孟天瑶, 陈英龙, 高平磊, 许轲, 霍中洋, 戴其根. 盐、干旱及其复合胁迫对水稻产量和品质形成影响的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 350-363. |
[3] | 吕宙, 易秉怀, 陈平平, 周文新, 唐文帮, 易镇邪. 施氮量与移栽密度对小粒型杂交水稻产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 422-436. |
[4] | 赵艺婷, 谢可冉, 高逖, 崔克辉. 水稻分蘖期干旱锻炼对幼穗分化期高温下穗发育和产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 277-289. |
[5] | 周甜, 吴少华, 康建宏, 吴宏亮, 杨生龙, 王星强, 李昱, 黄玉峰. 不同种植模式对水稻籽粒淀粉含量及淀粉关键酶活性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 303-315. |
[6] | 彭显龙, 董强, 张辰, 李鹏飞, 李博琳, 刘智蕾, 于彩莲. 不同土壤条件下秸秆还田量对土壤还原性物质及水稻生长的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(2): 198-210. |
[7] | 朱旺, 张翔, 耿孝宇, 张哲, 陈英龙, 韦还和, 戴其根, 许轲, 朱广龙, 周桂生, 孟天瑶. 盐-旱复合胁迫下水稻根系的形态和生理特征及其与产量形成的关系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(6): 617-627. |
[8] | 邹宇傲, 吴启侠, 周乾顺, 朱建强, 晏军. 孕穗期杂交中稻对淹涝胁迫的响应[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(6): 642-656. |
[9] | 袁沛, 周旋, 杨威, 尹凌洁, 靳拓, 彭建伟, 荣湘民, 田昌. 化肥减氮配施对洞庭湖区双季稻产量和田面水氮磷流失风险的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(5): 518-528. |
[10] | 肖大康, 胡仁, 韩天富, 张卫峰, 侯俊, 任科宇. 氮肥用量和运筹对我国水稻产量及其构成因子影响的整合分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(5): 529-542. |
[11] | 黄亚茹, 徐鹏, 王乐乐, 贺一哲, 王辉, 柯健, 何海兵, 武立权, 尤翠翠. 外源海藻糖对粳稻品系W1844籽粒灌浆特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 379-391. |
[12] | 高欠清, 任孝俭, 翟中兵, 郑普兵, 吴源芬, 崔克辉. 头季穗肥和促芽肥对再生稻再生芽生长及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 405-414. |
[13] | 王文婷, 马佳颖, 李光彦, 符卫蒙, 李沪波, 林洁, 陈婷婷, 奉保华, 陶龙兴, 符冠富, 秦叶波. 高温下不同施肥量对水稻产量品质形成的影响及其与能量代谢的关系分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 253-264. |
[14] | 杨晓龙, 王彪, 汪本福, 张枝盛, 张作林, 杨蓝天, 程建平, 李阳. 不同水分管理方式对旱直播水稻产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 285-294. |
[15] | 魏晓东, 宋雪梅, 赵凌, 赵庆勇, 陈涛, 路凯, 朱镇, 黄胜东, 王才林, 张亚东. 硅锌肥及其施用方式对南粳46产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 295-306. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||