干旱驯化后节水抗旱稻苗期不同发育时间DNA甲基化模式变化分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2014.01.005

中国水稻科学 ›› 2014, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (1): 32-40.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2014.01.005

干旱驯化后节水抗旱稻苗期不同发育时间DNA甲基化模式变化分析

郑小国^1,2，# ,陈亮^1，# ,楼巧君¹,夏辉¹,李明寿¹,罗利军^{1, 2, *}

¹上海市农业生物基因中心, 上海 201106; ²华中农业大学植物科学技术学院, 武汉430070；

收稿日期:2013-08-30 修回日期:2013-10-30 出版日期:2014-01-10 发布日期:2014-01-10
通讯作者: 罗利军1, 2, *
基金资助:
国家863计划资助项目（2012AA101102）；上海市科技兴农重点攻关项目\[沪农科攻字（2010）第11号\]；高层次科技人才培引工程（2010C1120）。

Changes in DNA Methylation Pattern in a Watersaving and Droughtresistance Rice Variety at Threeleaf and Fourleaf stages after Drought Domestication

ZHENG Xiaoguo ^1,2,# ,CHEN Liang ^1,# , LOU Qiaojun¹ , XIA Hui ¹, LI Mingshou¹ , LUO Lijun ^1,2,*

¹Shanghai Agrobiological Gene Center, Shanghai 201106, China; ²College of Plant Sciences & Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;

Received:2013-08-30 Revised:2013-10-30 Online:2014-01-10 Published:2014-01-10
Contact: LUO Lijun1,2,*

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以一个节水抗旱稻沪旱3号为研究材料，经过连续6代干旱胁迫驯化后，采用甲基化敏感扩增多态性方法在苗期不同发育时间对原始代（G0）和第6代（G6）DNA甲基化变化情况进行分析。结果表明，沪旱3号甲基化位点比例约为34%，其中，全甲基化位点约占84%，半甲基化位点约占16%。在苗期，随着沪旱3号生长发育，甲基化水平下降。不同世代或/和不同发育时间差异甲基化位点占总检测位点的4.0%，其中，大部分仅与发育相关（57.9%），而世代之间无差异。干旱驯化后，G6的DNA甲基化模式发生了改变。G6与G0相比，在3叶期，去甲基化事件占主要部分（59.1%）；在4叶期，甲基化事件占主要部分（47.9%）。生长发育涉及全基因组DNA甲基化变化，变化位点主要分布在启动子区域和外显子区域。功能聚类分析表明差异甲基化位点相关基因涉及广泛的功能。

关键词: 干旱驯化, 节水抗旱稻, DNA甲基化, 甲基化敏感扩增多态性

Abstract: A watersaving and droughtresistance rice Huhan 3 was grown under drought stress for six successive generations after transplanting in the field. The variations in DNA methylation pattern between the original generation (G0) and the sixth generation (G6) were analyzed by methylation sensitive amplification polymorphism (MSAP) method. The results revealed that the methylated loci accounted for about 34% of the total. Among these, about 84% were fullmethylated loci and about 16% were hemimethylated ones. The DNA methylation level decreased from the threeleaf stage to the fourleaf stage in Huhan 3. Differentially methylated loci (DML) between generations or/and between different developmental stages accounted for 4.0% of the total, most of which were only related to plant development(579%). Compared to G0, the DNA methylation pattern of G6 changed after drought domestication, at threeleaf stage, demethylated events occupying 59.1%, while at fourleaf stage, remethylated events occupied 47.9%. Genomewide alternations of DNA methylation were observed along with rice growth and development, and DML mainly occurred on the gene′s promoter and exon region. The genes with DML were involved in a wide range of functions and participated in many important biological processes.

Key words: drought domestication, watersaving and droughtresistance rice (WDR), DNA methylation, methylationsensitive amplification polymorphism (MSAP)

中图分类号:

郑小国1,2，# ,陈亮1，# ,楼巧君1 ,夏辉1,李明寿1,罗利军1, 2, *. 干旱驯化后节水抗旱稻苗期不同发育时间DNA甲基化模式变化分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2014, 28(1): 32-40.

ZHENG Xiaoguo1,2,#, CHEN Liang1,#, LOU Qiaojun1, XIA Hui1, LI Mingshou1, LUO Lijun1,2,*. Changes in DNA Methylation Pattern in a Watersaving and Droughtresistance Rice Variety at Threeleaf and Fourleaf stages after Drought Domestication[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2014, 28(1): 32-40.

参考文献

\[1\]Bird A. DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes Dev, 2002, 16(1): 621.

\[2\]Goll M G, Bestor T H. Eukaryotic cytosine methyltransferases. Annu Rev Biochem, 2005, 74: 481514.

\[3\]Jackson J P, Lindroth A M, Cao X, et al. Control of CpNpG DNA methylation by the KRYPTONITE histone H3 methyltransferase. Nature, 2002, 416(6880): 556560.

\[4\]Henderson I R, Jacobsen S E. Epigenetic inheritance in plants. Nature, 2007, 447(7143): 418424.

\[5\]Chan S W, Henderson I R, Jacobsen S E. Gardening the genome: DNA methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat Rev Genet, 2005, 6(5): 351360.

\[6\]Li X, Wang X, He K, et al. Highresolution mapping of epigenetic modifications of the rice genome uncovers interplay between DNA methylation, histone methylation, and gene expression. Plant Cell, 2008, 20(2): 259276.

\[7\]Zhang X, Yazaki J, Sundaresan A, et al. Genomewide highresolution mapping and functional analysis of DNA methylation in Arabidopsis. Cell, 2006, 126(6): 11891201.

\[8\]Bender J. DNA methylation and epigenetics. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2004, 55: 4168.

\[9\]Paszkowski J, Whitham S A. Gene silencing and DNA methylation processes. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2001, 4(2): 123129.

\[10\]Tsukahara S, Kobayashi A, Kawabe A, et al. Bursts of retrotransposition reproduced in Arabidopsis. Nature, 2009, 461(7262): 423426.

\[11\]Cubas P, Vincent C, Coen E. An epigenetic mutation responsible for natural variation in floral symmetry. Nature, 1999, 401(6749): 157161.

\[12\]Manning K, Tor M, Poole M, et al. A naturally occurring epigenetic mutation in a gene encoding an SBPbox transcription factor inhibits tomato fruit ripening. Nat Genet, 2006, 38(8): 948952.

\[13\]Santos F, Hendrich B, Reik W, et al. Dynamic reprogramming of DNA methylation in the early mouse embryo. Dev Biol, 2002, 241(1): 172182.

\[14\]Steimer A, Schob H, Grossniklaus U. Epigenetic control of plant development: New layers of complexity. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2004, 7(1): 1119.

\[15\]Boyko A, Kovalchuk I. Epigenetic control of plant stress response. Environ Mol Mutagen, 2008, 49(1): 6172.

\[16\]Miura K, Agetsuma M, Kitano H, et al. A metastable DWARF1 epigenetic mutant affecting plant stature in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2009, 106(27): 1121811223.

\[17\]Zhang L, Cheng Z, Qin R, et al. Identification and characterization of an epiallele of FIE1 reveals a regulatory linkage between two epigenetic marks in rice. Plant Cell, 2012, 24(11): 44074421.

\[18\]Sha A H, Lin X H, Huang J B, et al. Analysis of DNA methylation related to rice adult plant resistance to bacterial blight based on methylationsensitive AFLP (MSAP) analysis. Mol Genet Genom, 2005, 273(6): 484490.

\[19\]潘雅姣, 傅彬英, 王迪, 等. 水稻干旱胁迫诱导DNA甲基化时空变化特征分析. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(9): 30093018.

\[20\]Karan R, DeLeon T, Biradar H, et al. Salt stress induced variation in DNA methylation pattern and its influence on gene expression in contrasting rice genotypes. PLoS ONE， 2012, 7(6): e40203.

\[21\]Wang W, Zhao X, Pan Y, et al. DNA methylation changes detected by methylationsensitive amplified polymorphism in two contrasting rice genotypes under salt stress. J Genet Genom， 2011, 38(9): 41924.

\[22\]Tan M P. Analysis of DNA methylation of maize in response to osmotic and salt stress based on methylationsensitive amplified polymorphism. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2010, 48(1): 2126.

\[23\]Ou X, Zhang Y, Xu C, et al. Transgenerational inheritance of modified DNA methylation patterns and enhanced tolerance induced by heavy metal stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.). PLoS ONE， 2012, 7(9): e41143.

\[24\]Chinnusamy V, Gong Z, Zhu J K. Abscisic acidmediated epigenetic processes in plant development and stress responses. J Integr Plant Biol, 2008, 50(10): 118795.

\[25\]Verhoeven K J, Jansen J J, van Dijk P J, et al. Stressinduced DNA methylation changes and their heritability in asexual dandelions. New Phytol, 2010, 185(4): 11081118.

\[26\]Dowen R H, Pelizzola M, Schmitz R J, et al. Widespread dynamic DNA methylation in response to biotic stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 2012, 109(32): e2183e2191.

\[27\]Aina R, Sgorbati S, Santagostino A, et al. Specific hypomethylation of DNA is induced by heavy metals in white clover and industrial hemp. Physiol Plant, 2004, 121(3): 472480.

\[28\]Kou H P, Li Y, Song X X, et al. Heritable alteration in DNA methylation induced by nitrogendeficiency stress accompanies enhanced tolerance by progenies to the stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Plant Physiol, 2011, 168(14): 16851693.

\[29\]Cervera M T, RuizGarcia L, MartinezZapater J M. Analysis of DNA methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana based on methylationsensitive AFLP markers. Mol Genet Genom, 2002, 268(4): 543552.

\[30\]Paun O, Bateman R M, Fay M F, et al. Stable epigenetic effects impact adaptation in allopolyploid orchids (Dactylorhiza: Orchidaceae). Mol Biol Evol， 2010, 27(11): 24652473.

\[31\]Xiong L Z, Xu C G, Saghai Maroof M A, et al. Patterns of cytosine methylation in an elite rice hybrid and its parental lines, detected by a methylationsensitive amplification polymorphism technique. Mol Gen Genet, 1999, 261(3): 439446.

\[32\]Lu Y, Rong T, Cao M. Analysis of DNA methylation in different maize tissues. J Genet Genom, 2008, 35(1): 4148.

\[33\]Sakthivel K, Girishkumar K, Ramkumar G, et al. Alterations in inheritance pattern and level of cytosine DNA methylation, and their relationship with heterosis in rice. Euphytica, 2010, 175(3): 303314.

\[34\]Luo L J. Breeding for watersaving and droughtresistance rice (WDR) in China. J Exp Bot, 2010, 61(13): 35093517.

\[35\]罗利军, 梅捍卫, 余新桥, 等. 节水抗旱稻及其发展策略. 科学通报, 2011, 56(11): 804811.

\[36\]Vos, P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, et al. AFLP: A new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res, 1995, 23(21): 44074414.

\[37\]许绍斌, 陶玉芬, 杨昭庆, 等. 简单快速的DNA银染和胶保存方法. 遗传, 2002, 24(3): 335336.

\[38\]Zhang M, Kimatu J N, Xu K, et al. DNA cytosine methylation in plant development. J Genet Genom, 2010, 37(1): p. 112.

\[39\]Zhao Z, Han L. CpG islands: Algorithms and applications in methylation studies. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2009, 382(4): 643645.

[1]	邓卉, 鄂志国, 牛百晓, 王磊, 陈忱. DNA甲基化抑制剂5-氮脱氧胞苷对水稻基因组甲基化及幼苗生长发育的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(2): 108-117.
[2]	杜兴彬1,2,罗利军1,陈晨1,李双喜3,刘国兰1,王飞名1,张安宁1,顾晓君2,余新桥1,2,*. 稻油轮作连续免耕直播对作物产量及土壤理化性状的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2013, 27(6): 617-623.
[3]	吴绍华,薛晶晶,张红宇,徐培洲,吴先军. 双胚苗水稻单倍体及其杂交后代基因组DNA甲基化特异位点的分析及功能探讨[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2011, 25(3): 249-255 .

干旱驯化后节水抗旱稻苗期不同发育时间DNA甲基化模式变化分析

Changes in DNA Methylation Pattern in a Watersaving and Droughtresistance Rice Variety at Threeleaf and Fourleaf stages after Drought Domestication

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics